JAMA Cardiology—The Year in Review, 2017 Robert O

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JAMA Cardiology—The Year in Review, 2017 Robert O Editorial Opinion JAMA Cardiology—The Year in Review, 2017 Robert O. Bonow, MD, MS After the run up to the launch of JAMA Cardiology in April 2016 Table. JAMA Cardiology Statistics for 2017 and the 9 issues that followed in its first year, 2017 marked our a first full year of publishing. Looking back, 2017 was a period Characteristic Result of steady growth in original science manuscripts, opinions, re- Manuscript Data views, and educational con- Major manuscripts received, No. 1328 tent and continued interest in Research manuscripts received, No. 1040 Related article the journal by the cardiovas- Acceptance rate, % cular community. The 1328 Overall 17 manuscript submissions (Table) represent an increase of 10.8% Research 9 and the 1040 research submissions represent an increase of Peer reviewer turnaround, median, d 13 10% compared with the comparable 12 months of submis- Time from receipt to first decision without peer review, median, d 14 sions in 2016. As with other competitive journals in our spe- Time from acceptance to publication, median, d 54 cialty, our acceptance rate of original science manuscripts has Time from receipt to publication, median, d 122 fallen into single digits. Information Dissemination Data Our weekly online content is now sent to nearly 25 000 Recipients of electronic table of contents per week, No. 24 723 readers, and there were more than 900 000 full-text/PDF Full-text/PDF downloads per year, No. 902 537 downloads last year. We maintain an active presence on so- Twitter followers, No. 9536 cial media, and remarkably, our Twitter and Facebook follow- Facebook followers, No. 46 830 ers have increased by 76% and 45%, respectively, during the Top 3 articles, Altmetric scoreb past year. Feedback on our monthly podcasts has been very Brandt et al,1 Hospital Admissions for Myocardial Infarction and 1221 positive. As a member of the JAMA Network, our close con- Stroke Before and After the Trans-Fatty Acid Restrictions in nections with the dedicated JAMA editors and staff facilitate New York 2 the many channels of delivery of our weekly and monthly con- Wang et al, Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Heart Rate Monitors 1209 3 tent. Cardiovascular science continues to advance at a breath- Scragg et al, Effect of Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D 992 Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease in the Vitamin D taking pace, as does its opportunities for multimedia dissemi- Assessment Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial nation, and it is a privilege to serve as a conduit of fresh ideas, Top 3 most cited articles, No. of citations, 2016-2017 new scientific findings, and informative reviews. Edwards et al,4 Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction 41 Model for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic The Table also lists the articles that have received the Valve Replacement highest Altmetric scores in 2017 and the most citations over Hsu et al,5 Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Prescription in Patients 41 the past 2 years. This brief listing provides a glimpse of the With Atrial Fibrillation Across the Spectrum of Stroke Risk: Insights from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry broad cardiovascular landscape that is covered in JAMA Car- McGuire et al,6 Association Between Sitagliptin Use and Heart 36 diology. Two articles highlight the ongoing interest among Failure Hospitalization and Related Outcomes in Type 2 professional and lay readers on topics related to nutrition. Diabetes Mellitus: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Brandt et al1 identified an association between counties in a Data are based on major manuscripts, defined as all research, review, New York that implemented bans in trans-fats and hospital educational, and opinion articles (does not include letters). admissions for myocardial infarction and stroke compared b Altmetric score is a measure of electronic news and social media attention. with counties with trans-fat bans, and Scragg et al3 in New Zealand reported a clinical trial in which vitamin D supple- ments did not have a positive association on incident cardio- authors and readers. As a work in progress, this feedback has vascular disease. The article by Wang et al2 on the accuracy helped to fine-tune the look and feel of the journal. Our con- of wrist-worn heart monitors points to the growing aware- tent has been listed in PubMed since July 2016. In 2017, ness of the possibilities of digital health. Our highest-cited JAMA Cardiology was accepted into Web of Science, and we articles cover topics of valvular heart disease and atrial fibril- anticipate the journal’s first impact factor will be released in lation from important national registries4,5 and an analysis June of this year. of the lack of association of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors The editors must also thank the hundreds of our col- and incident heart failure in patients with diabetes enrolled leagues who have served as peer reviewers.7 We recognize the in international clinical trials.6 time and effort required for effective peer review, and we are The primary value of the journal rests on its standing as grateful for the knowledge and insights our reviewers have vol- a home for exceptional authors, and on behalf of the editors, unteered to enhance the analytic methods, data interpreta- I sincerely thank our authors who have accepted JAMA Car- tion, and take-home messages of our manuscripts. This ef- diology as the source for publishing some of their finest fort is not rewarded appropriately, but it remains the backbone efforts. We greatly appreciate the constructive comments, of manuscript evaluation and is greatly appreciated. Percep- suggestions, and criticisms we continue to receive from our tive reviews often translate into editorials and invited com- jamacardiology.com (Reprinted) JAMA Cardiology May 2018 Volume 3, Number 5 373 © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 Opinion Editorial mentaries that accompany the original article and help to place as we strive to select the most seminal, interesting, and the new findings in context. thought-provoking articles and opinions of interest to our read- Scientific publishing is a team sport, and maintaining this ership. level of productivity requires the dedicated efforts of JAMA As JAMA Cardiology matures, we look forward to main- Cardiology’s talented deputy and associate editors who take taining the momentum we have created in our first 2 years of valuable time from their busy professional and personal lives publishing and achieving our vision to take a position among to oversee the flow of manuscripts and collectively provide the the premier journals in our discipline. Through your contri- strategic vision of the journal. Our group spends hundreds of butions to our scientific manuscripts, reviews, Viewpoints, Edi- hours critiquing manuscripts, communicating with authors and torials, and Invited Commentaries, we will continue to con- reviewers, and making editorial decisions to generate the con- tribute prominently to the discourse that is fueling the tent of our pages. Working together, we deliberate each week advances in cardiovascular medicine. ARTICLE INFORMATION and stroke before and after the trans-fatty acid 5. Hsu JC, Maddox TM, Kennedy KF, et al. Oral Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, restrictions in New York. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6): anticoagulant therapy prescription in patients with Northwestern University Feinberg School of 627-634. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0491 atrial fibrillation across the spectrum of stroke risk: Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Editor, JAMA Cardiology. 2. Wang R, Blackburn G, Desai M, et al. Accuracy of insights from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry. JAMA wrist-worn heart rate monitors. JAMA Cardiol.2017; Cardiol. 2016;1(1):55-62. doi:10.1001/jamacardio Corresponding Author: Robert O. Bonow, MD, MS, .2015.0374 Department of Medicine, Northwestern University 2(1):104-106. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3340 Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E Huron St, Galter 3. Scragg R, Stewart AW, Waayer D, et al. Effect of 6. McGuire DK, Van de Werf F, Armstrong PW, et al; 3-150, Chicago, IL 60611 ([email protected]). monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With cardiovascular disease in the Vitamin D Assessment Sitagliptin (TECOS) Study Group. Association Published Online: March 21, 2018. between sitagliptin use and heart failure doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4979 Study: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):608-616. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175 hospitalization and related outcomes in type 2 Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The author has diabetes mellitus: secondary analysis of a completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for 4. Edwards FH, Cohen DJ, O’Brien SM, et al; randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(2): Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Steering Committee of the Society of Thoracic 126-135. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0103 none were reported. Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. 7. JAMA Cardiology peer reviewers in 2017 Development and validation of a risk prediction [published online March 21, 2018]. JAMA Cardiol. REFERENCES model for in-hospital mortality after transcatheter doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4980 1. Brandt EJ, Myerson R, Perraillon MC, Polonsky aortic valve replacement. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1): TS. Hospital admissions for myocardial infarction 46-52. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0326 374 JAMA Cardiology May 2018 Volume 3, Number 5 (Reprinted) jamacardiology.com © 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021.
Recommended publications
  • Conference and Exhibition Programme 2017
    CONNECTING THE KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY Conference and Exhibition SPONSORS Diamond VitalSource Technologies Limited Programme Platinum EBSCO '70s Party Night Innovative Gold 2017 ACS Publications ARPHA: Journal Publishing Platform 10–12 April 2017 Association for Computing Machinery Copyright Clearance Center Harrogate Convention Centre Elsevier www.uksg.org Emerald Publishing Gale, a Cengage Company HARRASSOWITZ IEEE Xplore® Digital Library OCLC Oxford University Press Royal Society of Chemistry Statista Ltd Talis Turpin Distribution Services Ltd Wolters Kluwer Silver ACCUCOMS Adam Matthew AdvantageCS AIP Publishing Annual Reviews Askews & Holts Library Services Ltd BioMed Central BRILL Burgundy Information Services Clarivate Analytics Digital Science Ex Libris IOP Publishing Jisc Get the app and JoVE Kanopy use the hashtag LM Information Delivery ProQuest SAGE Publishing www.uksg.org/app Springer Nature Taylor & Francis Group #UKSG17 The JAMA Network Optimize Your Library’s Collection & Maximize the Value of Your Resources with EBSCO • Bring together e-books, e-packages, e-journals and databases through EBSCO Discovery Service • Improve the research experience for your end users • Increase your library’s work ow • Integrate resources from other partners www.ebsco.com +44 20 8447 4200 [email protected] Plenary Session 1 Optimize Your Library’s Collection Monday 10 April Threats and opportunities 08.00 & Maximize the Value of Your Resources with EBSCO Main Auditorium Registration Chair: Kate Price, King’s College London Main Foyer 08.30
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Article Processing Fees on Open Access Journals with a 4.5-Year History of Publishing Daniel Robles Canteroa, Todd R
    Analytics of Journals and Publishers Comparison of Article Processing Fees on Open Access Journals with a 4.5-Year History of Publishing Daniel Robles Canteroa, Todd R. Schoenbaumb, Zinaida Y. Zhehulovychc, Ivan V. Nagorniakd, *, & Ievgen I. Fesenkoe, * SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION they began establishing journals that rely on open access publication fee.1 Most motivation Open access article (synonym: open access criteria for the authors from the fields of publication) is a type of peer-reviewed article oral and maxillofacial surgery, periodontics which gives a possibility to the readers to read in choosing to what peer-reviewed journal and download it free of charge owing to paying submit their paper may be classified under an open access publication fee (OAPF) directly three chief groups: 1) indexing and abstracting by its authors, their institutions, or funders.1 in different recognized data bases (PubMed/ According to Solomon and Björk`s study, who Medline,4 Scopus, Web of Science, etc.), 2) an analyzed about 1,370 journals, article processing impact metric,5 and 3) an amount of the article charges range from 8 to 3,900 US Dollars.1, 2 processing charge. First two motivation criteria Moreover, the official Elsevier`s page dedicated are precisely described in recent publications to the list of all company`s open access journals but the last one – open access publication fee indicated that an article processing charge can and its amount – should be investigated more reach 6,000 US Dollars excluding tax.3 First scrupulously.4, 5 There is a great need to analyze publishing houses that supported and develop the advantages and disadvantages of OAPF both open access journals have been two new for authors and editorial staff/publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference and Exhibition Programme 2018
    CONNECTING THE KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY Conference and Exhibition SPONSORS Diamond EBSCO Programme Platinum ACS Publications Conference Dinner Bloomsbury Digital Resources Gold 2018 ARPHA Publishing Platform Association for Computing Machinery 9–11 April 2018 ATYPON Copyright Clearance Center SEC, Glasgow Digital Science Elsevier www.uksg.org Gale, a Cengage Company IEEE Xplore® Digital Library Innovative NEJM Group OCLC Ovid Technologies Oxford University Press Royal Society of Chemistry VitalSource Silver AAAS/Science ACCUCOMS Adam Matthew Digital AdvantageCS AIP Publishing Annual Reviews Askews and Holts Library Services Ltd Burgundy Information Services Ltd Ex Libris HARRASSOWITZ Institution of Engineering and Technology IOP Publishing JoVE KORTEXT LM Information Delivery Get the app and Mary Ann Liebert, Inc Publishers ProQuest use the hashtag Ringgold Inc SAGE Publishing Springer Nature www.uksg.org/app Taylor & Francis Group The JAMA Network #UKSG18 Wizdom pubs.acs.org/4librarians What to look out for in 2018 from ACS Publications OPEN ACCESS Our expanded programme of Great news for any authors who were outreach events will be covering included in the $60M initiative in 2014. more institutions in Europe, Middle We have extended the program to East and Africa than ever before. allow unclaimed Author Rewards to be Interested in hosting an event at your redeemed on articles published in ACS institution? Contact us via our Omega until the end of 2018. website: acsoncampus.acs.org NEW JOURNALS IN 2018 INCLUDE: Institutional subscribers to ACS All Publications, All Access, and token packages will automatically get access to these valuable new resources, which will begin publishing Articles ASAP (As Soon As Publishable) in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Helm Leading Transformation
    AT THE HELM LEADING TRANSFORMATION Baltimore, Maryland Association of College and Research Libraries | conference.acrl.org/ cover.indd 1 2/24/2017 3:32:00 PM ANNUAL REVIEWS CONNECT WITH OUR EXPERTS EXPERT INSIGHT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Annual Reviews is a nonprofit publisher of highly cited review journals dedicated to synthesizing and integrating knowledge for the progress of science and the benefit of society. NEWEST JOURNALS FROM ANNUAL REVIEWS: • Annual Review of Cancer Biology • New in March 2017 • Annual Review of Linguistics • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior • Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application • Annual Review of Virology • Annual Review of Vision Science SECURE ACCESS FOR YOUR PATRONS TODAY Visit www.annualreviews.org or email [email protected]. Visit us at ACRL in Booth #845! Enter Our Raffle • Learn About Forthcoming Journals • Meet the Team ANNUAL REVIEWS | Connect With Our Experts 650.493.4400/800.523.8635 (US/CAN) www.annualreviews.org | [email protected] Program2017.indb 1 2/16/2017 2:28:48 PM Visit Booth #734 and discover premium content for your institution! Ovid® is the leading information search, discovery, and management solution providing a single online destination for seamlessly accessing and working with premium online journals, books, and databases from the world’s leading publishers. Learn more about Ovid visit www.ovid.com @OvidTechnologies @WKHealthOvid 7-V401 7-V401-2017-Ovid-00002-ACRL Final Program Ad-8_5x11-FINAL.indd 1 09/11/16 4:23 PM Program2017.indb 2 2/16/2017 2:28:48 PM CONFERENCE SCHEDULE AT-A-GLANCE Visit Booth #734 TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2017 8:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 09 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.671569 Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid Abdelrahman I. Abushouk 1*, Ismaeel Yunusa 2,3, Ahmed O. Elmehrath 4, Abdelmagid M. Elmatboly 5, Shady Hany Fayek 4, Omar M. Abdelfattah 6, Anas Saad 1, Toshiaki Isogai 1, Shashank Shekhar 1, Ankur Kalra 1, Grant W. Reed 1, Rishi Puri 1 and Samir Kapadia 1 1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2 Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States, 3 Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, United States, 4 Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 5 Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, United States Edited by: Jinwei Tian, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Objective: Systematic reviews are increasingly used as sources of evidence in clinical Harbin Medical University, China cardiology guidelines. In the present study, we aimed to assess the quality of published Reviewed by: Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira, systematic reviews in high impact cardiology journals. University of São Paulo, Brazil Methods: We searched PubMed for systematic reviews published between 2010 Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, University of Porto, Portugal and 2019 in five general cardiology journals with the highest impact factor (according Zhuozhong Wang, to Clarivate Analytics 2019). We extracted data on eligibility criteria, methodological The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China characteristics, bias assessments, and sources of funding.
    [Show full text]