DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment Consent Decision and Decision Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment Consent Decision and Decision Report Environmental Impact Assessment Consent Decision and Decision Report Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”) Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 (“the Act”) Aggregate extraction Area 521 – Goodwin Sands MLA/2016/00227 25 July 2018 Drafted by David Morris Date 01/05/2018 Marine Licensing Case Officer Checked by Abbey Pennington Date 16/07/2018 Marine Licensing Case Manager Checked by Matthew Kinmond Date 19/07/2018 Senior Marine Licensing Case Manager Checked by Shaun Nicholson Date 25/07/2018 Head of Strategic Marine Licensing Page 1 of 41 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 1.1. Purpose of the Report ................................................................................ 3 1.2. Decision ..................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1. EIA Consent Decision ............................................................................. 4 1.2.2. Marine Licence Decision ......................................................................... 4 2. Application details ..................................................................................... 5 2.1. Project details ............................................................................................ 5 2.2. Need for the Proposed Project ................................................................... 6 3. Legislative and Policy Framework ............................................................. 7 3.1. Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 ........................................................ 7 3.2. Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”) .................................................................... 7 3.3. Water Framework Directive (Council Directive 2000/60/EC) (“WFD”) ........ 7 3.4. Waste Framework Directive (Council Directive 2008/98/EC) (“WaFD”) ..... 8 3.5. The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 ................... 8 3.6. Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) ...................................... 8 3.7. Marine Conservation Zones ....................................................................... 9 3.8. Sites of Nature Conservation Importance and UK Biodiversity Action Plan 9 3.9. Marine Policy Statement .......................................................................... 10 3.10. National Planning Policy Framework ....................................................... 10 3.11. Protection of Military Remains Act (1986) (POMRA) ............................... 10 3.12. UNESCO Convention for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001) ...................................................................................................... 11 3.13. Valletta Convention .................................................................................. 11 4. Consultation Exercise .............................................................................. 11 4.1. First Consultation ..................................................................................... 11 4.2. Second Consultation ................................................................................ 13 4.3. Third Consultation .................................................................................... 14 4.4. Recovery of marine licence application .................................................... 14 5. Evaluation ................................................................................................ 15 5.1. Alternative source of material .................................................................. 17 5.2. Archaeology and the Historic Environment .............................................. 18 5.3. Coastal Processes, Hydrodynamics and Flood Risk................................ 22 5.4. Water Quality ........................................................................................... 23 5.5. Nature Conservation ................................................................................ 24 5.5.1. European and Ramsar Sites ................................................................. 24 5.5.2. Sites of Special Scientific Interest ......................................................... 26 5.5.3. MCZs, recommended (rMCZs) and proposed MCZs (pMCZs) ............. 27 5.5.4. Goodwin Sands pMCZ.......................................................................... 28 Page 2 of 41 5.6. Benthic Ecology ....................................................................................... 29 5.7. Ornithology .............................................................................................. 30 5.8. Marine Mammals ..................................................................................... 31 5.9. Fish and Shellfish ..................................................................................... 32 5.10. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries .................................................. 34 5.11. Commercial and Recreational Navigation ................................................ 35 5.12. Tourism, Recreation and Socio-Economics ............................................. 36 5.13. Waste Framework Directive ..................................................................... 36 5.14. Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................. 36 5.15. Environmental Statement ......................................................................... 38 5.16. Other Matters ........................................................................................... 38 5.17. Monitoring, Mitigation and Other Conditions ............................................ 39 5.17.1. Archaeology and the Historic Environment ....................................... 40 5.17.2. Physical Processes ........................................................................... 40 5.17.3. Nature Conservation ......................................................................... 40 5.17.4. Benthic Ecology ................................................................................. 40 5.17.5. Marine Mammals ............................................................................... 40 5.17.6. Commercial and Recreational Fishing ............................................... 40 5.17.7. Navigation ......................................................................................... 41 5.18. Data, Evidence and Modelling ................................................................. 41 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose of the Report This report is the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) consent decision and decision report for a marine licence under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 for aggregate dredging at Area 521 – Goodwin Sands (“the Project”). Dover Harbour Board (“DHB”) applied for a marine licence under Part 4 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 (the Act) on 19 May 2016. The purpose of this report is to summarise the proposed Project, the consultation undertaken and to record the key reasons for the Marine Management Organisation’s (“MMO”) evaluation and conclusions under the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended) (“the Regulations”) and Section 69 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act (2009) (“the Act”). Page 3 of 41 1.2. Decision In summary: The MMO has reviewed the proposed Project, and has concluded a favourable EIA consent decision and has determined that it is appropriate to grant a marine licence under Part 4 of the Act. The MMO has concluded that adequate mitigation measures have been included to minimise the potential significant impacts associated with the proposed Project. Measures to control impacts will be secured through marine licence conditions. 1.2.1. EIA Consent Decision In reaching this decision, the MMO has considered the Environmental Statement (“ES”) submitted in support of the application (including the Further Environmental Information) and representations received. The MMO concludes that an EIA consent for the Project should be given under the Regulations. An assessment of the likely significant impacts to the environment has been conducted and the MMO concludes that adequate mitigation measures will minimise the potential impacts of the Project. A summary of the consultation process is given at Section 4 of this Report. A summary of the evaluation undertaken by ES topic is presented in Section 5. 1.2.2. Marine Licence Decision The MMO concludes that a marine licence for the Project should be given under Part 4 of the Act, having regard to the test(s) under Section 69 of the Act and all other considerations. A full assessment of the impacts to the environment, human health and other legitimate uses of the sea including such other matters that the MMO thinks relevant has been conducted as summarised below in Section 5. The MMO has taken into account the evidence provided and the comprehensive consultations. The MMO has considered in its Decision under the Act, the clear conclusions of the EIA Consent Decision on individual issues as set out within Section 5, which includes consideration of the nature of the proposed activity (i.e. dredge campaign), its likely significant effects, and likely significant effects both individually and cumulatively. In relation to its decision under Part 4 of the Act, the MMO has considered the ES and representations received and in summary under Section 69 of the Act key considerations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maritime Motorways’: Beyond Surficial Geographies of Connection for Governing Global Shipping
    Deep Routeing and the Making of ‘Maritime Motorways’: Beyond surficial geographies of connection for governing global shipping Kimberley Peters, University of Liverpool, Accepted Version in Geopolitics Abstract Geography has turned to towards the seas and oceans with much attention being paid to ‘water worlds’ through socio-cultural, political and environmental lenses. Geo-economic analysis in particular, has considered the role of containerisation, the port, and global logistics flows central to the contemporary shipping industry. However, where routeing enters discussion these debates remain ‘surficial’ with a focus on the rationale of lines of connection which are mapped onto the sea (rather than into the sea, as a liquid, three-dimensional, motionful space). This paper challenges considerations of ship routeing that only skim the surface. This paper adds depth to the discussion. It is argued that ship routeing is not a purely surficial exercise of charting a voyage across seas and oceans. Routes have a geo-politics predicted at times on the water’s depth, the topography of the ocean floor and seabed and marine resources. Drawing on a variety of examples, notably the traffic routeing scheme – or ‘maritime motorway’ – governing the flows of shipping in the Dover Strait, UK, this paper brings a ‘wet ontology’ and three-dimensional analysis to ship routeing. It is contended that such a recognition and discussion of deep routeing is necessary to shed light upon the often invisible processes sea that underscore the global logistics flows vital to society and the economy. 1 Introduction On Monday 14th August 2017, the flow of shipping traffic into and out of the port of Antwerp, the second largest port in Europe, literally ground to the stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010)
    Department for Culture, Media and Sport Architecture and Historic Environment Division Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010) Compiled by English Heritage for the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites. Text was also contributed by Cadw, Historic Scotland and the Environment and Heritage Service, Northern Ireland. s e vi a D n i t r a M © Contents ZONE ONE – Wreck Site Maps and Introduction UK Designated Shipwrecks Map ......................................................................................3 Scheduled and Listed Wreck Sites Map ..........................................................................4 Military Sites Map .................................................................................................................5 Foreword: Tom Hassall, ACHWS Chair ..........................................................................6 ZONE TWO – Case Studies on Protected Wreck Sites The Swash Channel, by Dave Parham and Paola Palma .....................................................................................8 Archiving the Historic Shipwreck Site of HMS Invincible, by Brandon Mason ............................................................................................................ 10 Recovery and Research of the Northumberland’s Chain Pump, by Daniel Pascoe ............................................................................................................... 14 Colossus Stores Ship? No! A Warship Being Lost? by Todd Stevens ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Ship, Northeastern Victory, Which Was Wrecked on the Goodwin Saiids in 1946
    The American ship, Northeastern Victory, which was wrecked on the Goodwin Saiids in 1946 £\) THE DOVER SOCIETY FOUNDED IN 1988 Registered with the Civic trust, Affiliated to the Kent Federation of Amenity Societies Registered Charity No. 299954 PRESIDENTS Brigadier M aurice A therton CBE VICE-PRESIDENTS: Howard Blackett, Ivan Green, Peter Johnson, Miss Lillian Kay, Peter Marsh, The Rt. Hon. The Lord Rees, Jonathan Sloggett, Tferry Sutton, Miss Christine Waterman, Jack Woolford and Martin Wright THE COMMITTEE C h airm an & Press Secretary: Tbrry Sutton MBE 17 Bewsbury Cross Lane, Whitfield, Dover CT16 3HB Tfel: 01304 820122 V ice-Ch a irm a n: Derek Leach OBE 24 Riverdale, River, Dover CT17 OGX Tfel: 01304 823926 H o n . Secretary: William Naylor "Wood End", 87 Leybume Road, Dover CT16 1SH Tfel: 01304 211276 H o n . T reasurer: Mike Weston 71 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 202059 M embership Secretary: Sheila Cope 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tfel: 01304 211348 Social Secretary: Joan Liggett 19 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1HA Tfel: 01304 214886 E ditor: Merril Lilley 5 East Cliff, Dover CT16 1LX Tfel: 01304 205254 C hairm an of P lanning S ub-Com m ittee: Jack Woolford 1066 Green Lane, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3AR Tfel: 01304 330381 Cowgate P roject C o-o r d in a io r : Hugh Gordon 59 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 205115 A rchivist: Dr S.S.G. H ale 34 Church Hill, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3DR Tfel: 01304 825670 Jeremy Cope, Lesley Gordon, Anthony Lane, Mike McFarnell, Ken Wraight Content 2 EDITORIAL 4 PLANNING
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Plan for Broadstairs 2016
    AN ECONOMIC PLAN FOR BROADSTAIRS 2016 In 1851 Charles Dickens wrote Our English Watering Place, an essay to his favourite seaside holiday resort – Broadstairs: ‘since I have been idling at the window here, the tide has risen. The boats are dancing on the bubbling water; the colliers are afloat again; the white-bordered waves rush in; the children Do chase the ebbing Neptune, and do fly him When he comes back; the radiant sails are gliding past the shore, and shining on the far horizon; all the sea is sparkling, heaving, swelling up with life and beauty, this bright morning’ Our English Watering Place, Charles Dickens (1851) CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2. Background 3 Broadstairs & St Peter's Coastal Community Team 4. Local area 5. Community 6. Economy 7. Related Initiatives 8. Ambition 9. Needs of the community 10. SWOT analysis 11. Data 12 Delivering the Plan 12.1 Key projects 12.2 Short term goals/ actions for the first 6 months 12.3. Medium term goals/actions 12.4 Performance measures 12.5. Long term goals: strategic plan beyond 5 years 12.6 Barriers 12.7 Resources 12.8 Costs 12.9 Value 12.10 Funding 12.11. Maximising resources 13 Communications 13.1. Consultation 13.2. Communication and Engagement with partners and other bodies 13.3 Communication with community 14 Logistics 14.1. Management of the Team. 14.2 Support Structure 14.3 Costs 14.4 Sustainability 14.5 Areas of Specific Interest 1. INTRODUCTION Broadstairs & St Peter's is a charming and attractive resort town situated on the Isle of Thanet, on the eastern edge of Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime (PDF, 1.2
    South East Research Framework Resource Assessment and Research Agenda for Maritime (2012 with additions in 2013 and 2019) Maritime Gustav Milne (with contributions by Luke Barber, Polydora Baker, Joe Flatman and Dave Hooley) Contents Resource Assessment ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Submerged Landscapes...................................................................................... 2 The Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (with Dr J Flatman) ............................ 3 Nautical archaeology in south-east England: a resource assessment .................... 7 Figure 1 The Dover Bronze Age boat under excavation. Kent County Council . 10 Nautical Archaeology underwater, on land and in the inter-tidal zone (including a summary of marine management practice by Dave Hooley) ............................. 10 Wrecks and Hulks ............................................................................................. 11 Boats, 'barges' and ships ................................................................................... 12 Small boats ........................................................................................................ 13 Boats ................................................................................................................. 14 'Barges' .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seascape Character Assessment Report
    Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally Marshall First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Kate Ahern 1.0 Kate Ahern Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris Graham, MMO Comments David Hutchinson 2.0 Kate Ahern Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Sweeting Independent QA © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy
    EB 11.14b Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy Appendix 1: Theme 4b The District’s Maritime Coast – Wrecks 1 | P a g e PROJECT: Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy DOCUMENT NAME: Theme 4(b): Wrecks Version Status Prepared by Date V01 INTERNAL DRAFT F Clark 18.01.17 Comments - First draft of text. No illustrations, photographs or figures. Need to finalise references. Could add to “Unprotected Wrecks” with data from HER if needed? Version Status Prepared by Date V02 RETURNED DRAFT D Whittington 16.11.18 Update back from FHDC Version Status Prepared by Date V03 CONSULTATION DRAFT F Clark 29.11.18 Comments – Check through and title page inserted. Version Status Prepared by Date V04 Version Status Prepared by Date V05 2 | P a g e 4(b) Wrecks 1. Summary The Channel and Strait of Dover is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world. They have been the setting for a range of maritime activities and events going back to ancient times which also reflects the growing importance of various ports along the Kentish coastline, such as the Cinque Ports. The Channel has seen the arrival of invasion fleets and raiding vessels going back to the Roman period, and has been the scene of a number of naval conflicts. It has often acted as a frontline defence during times of warfare, and then in times of peace is an important trading route for both visiting vessels and those on route to other national and international ports. It is therefore unsurprising that a number of vessels have been lost to the sea over the years and now comprise a valuable collection of wrecks off the coast of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement
    REPORT Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Volume I - Non-Technical Summary Client: Dover Harbour Board Reference: I&BPB2107R001D01 Revision: 01/Final Date: 16 May 2016 O p e n HASKONINGDHV UK LTD. 2 Abbey Gardens Great College Street London SW1P 3NL Industry & Buildings VAT registration number: 792428892 +44 207 2222115 T [email protected] E royalhaskoningdhv.com W Document title: Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Document short title: Reference: I&BPB2107R001D01 Revision: 01/Final Date: 16 May 2016 Project name: Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Project number: PB2107 Author(s): Jack Douglas, Caroline Price Drafted by: Jack Douglas, Caroline Price Checked by: Steve Challinor Date / initials: SC 16/05/2016 Approved by: Nicola Clay Date / initials: NC 16/05/2016 Classification Open Disclaimer No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The quality management system of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001. 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 i O p e n Table of Contents Non- Technical
    [Show full text]
  • Goodwin Sands Shipwrecks a Ta Lk Bij Anthony Lane Reported by May Jones and Merril Lilley
    Goodwin Sands Shipwrecks A ta lk bij Anthony Lane Reported by May Jones and Merril Lilley IKE MANY OTHER coastal dwellers knocking at the door of a suspect house, the good folk of Deal had a the owner was was busily disposing of the Lreputation for being more contraband. Strangely, thirty years later, interested in the booty provided by an o th er M ahratta, also carrying tea, was wrecked ships than in the fate of the wrecked in the same place. crews and stories of battles between The Goodwins are notorious for revenue men and would-be smugglers wrecks and there are countless stories were commonplace. told of them over the centuries, tales of In his well illustrated talk, Dr. Lane sunken galleons and treasure waiting to quoted one of the few actually be found. Deal was a thriving town and authenticated cases, which occurred in always busy with sailors coming ashore 1909. A merchant vessel, the Mahratta, for food and other pleasures. Sometimes ran aground and tea, a commodity as many as five hundred ships might be subject to duty, began to find its way anchored in the Downs. Dr. Lane told us ashore. As the customs officer came many accounts of wrecks on the Sands, Probably the most infamous recent wreck on the Goodwin Sands was the American freighter Helena Modjeska, which went aground off Deal and broke in two in 1946. The ship carried 5,000 tons of food, of which a fair amount was smuggled ashore to supplement the restricted and rationed diet of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Analysis of the Goodwin Sands and the Brake Bank Author(S): R
    Hydrographic Analysis of the Goodwin Sands and the Brake Bank Author(s): R. L. Cloet Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 120, No. 2 (Jun., 1954), pp. 203-215 Published by: The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1791536 Accessed: 10-10-2019 09:26 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1791536?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 185.71.73.245 on Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:26:35 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms HYDROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE GOODWIN SANDS AND THE BRAKE BANK R. L. CLOET ofThere the Goodwinmust be Sands.few mariners Together whowith arethe ignorantBrake Bank, of thethe Sands existence form anda the dangers distinct submarine morphological unit, much less complex than the banks in Figure i the Thames Estuary, or the series of sandbanks off the Franco-Belgian shore- line.1 Because of this relative simplicity we are in a position to analyse the movements in which the two banks are subject (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Territorialisation of Temporarily Exposed English Sandbanks For
    Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, v6n1 — Hayward Gaming e Tide: e territorialisation of temporarily exposed English sandbanks for social cricket events Philip Hayward University of Technology Sydney, and Southern Cross University, Australia [email protected] Publication Information: Received 16 March 2017, Accepted 21 June 2017, Available online 28 June 2017 doi: 10.21463/jmic.2017.06.1.01 Abstract Over the last 200 years a number of sandbanks that rise above the surface of the sea or river estuaries for brief periods during low tide points have been site of cricket matches organised by teams based in adjacent coastal areas. The most regular locations for such performances have been the Goodwin Sands (an area of sandbanks located in the English Channel, close to the coast of the English county of Kent) and the Bramble Bank in the Solent. Other locations, such as banks in the River Tamar, have also seen one-off events of this kind. The article identifies these sports occasions as constituting particular forms of temporary territorialisations of space that adapt aspects of the game for the conditions of rapidly changing locations. The annual matches provide an example of the human rendition of spaces as temporary island neighbourhoods, the ephemerality of which is key to their attraction and meaning. Notably, they also involve a return to conventions of traditionally recognised ‘fair play’ in cricket that have significantly diminished in the modern form of the game. In this manner, the temporary spaces of the sandbanks allow for a revival of customs that relate to earlier participatory performance traditions and allow these to be re-affirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loss of the South Goodwin Lightship LV-90
    Home About Me Contact Blog MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGY, MARITIME HISTORY The Loss of The South Goodwin Lightship LV-90 “…The South Goodwin Lightship Search could just be seen, a dim red barque Search … !! married forever to the same compass point and condemned, like a property ship on the stage of Drury Lane, to watch a diorama of waves and clouds sail busily into the wings. Without papers or passengers or cargo, it lay anchored forever to the departure point which was also its destination….anchored to the gates of a graveyard.” Ian Fleming, Moonraker The Danger of Lightship Duty Although life aboard a lightship was routine and monotonous, it was beset with moments that were a true test of courage. The unfortunate story that this blog post is going to relate is a perfect testament to the danger of lightship duty. I wanted to continue the theme of the previous blog posts regarding my research into LV-95 by relating a story of survival that illustrates both the inherent hazard and therefore the importance of lightship duty. Lightships have long since been eclipsed by modern technology with the last American lightship Nantucket being taken off station in 1985 and the LV- 95 being taken off station from the port of Milwaukee by the installation of a radio beacon. It is the feeling of this author that people have forgotten what these ships are and what they did. I have recently obtained the rare model kit of the South Goodwin produced by Revell not knowing the tragic history behind this ship and that is my inspiration for this blog post.
    [Show full text]