DOCSLIB.ORG

Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement REPORT Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Volume I - Non-Technical Summary Client: Dover Harbour Board Reference: I&BPB2107R001D01 Revision: 01/Final Date: 16 May 2016 O p e n HASKONINGDHV UK LTD. 2 Abbey Gardens Great College Street London SW1P 3NL Industry & Buildings VAT registration number: 792428892 +44 207 2222115 T [email protected] E royalhaskoningdhv.com W Document title: Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Document short title: Reference: I&BPB2107R001D01 Revision: 01/Final Date: 16 May 2016 Project name: Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Project number: PB2107 Author(s): Jack Douglas, Caroline Price Drafted by: Jack Douglas, Caroline Price Checked by: Steve Challinor Date / initials: SC 16/05/2016 Approved by: Nicola Clay Date / initials: NC 16/05/2016 Classification Open Disclaimer No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The quality management system of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001. 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 i O p e n Table of Contents Non- Technical Summary 1 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this NTS 1 1.2 The Proposed Dredging Scheme 1 1.3 Need for the Proposed Dredging Scheme 1 1.4 Structure of this NTS 1 2 Project Description 2 2.1 Introduction 2 2.2 Dredging Methodology and Timings 2 2.2.1 Methodology 2 2.2.2 Dredging Cycles and Programme 3 2.3 Consideration of Alternatives 4 3 The EIA Process 5 3.1 Legislative Requirements 5 3.2 Impact Assessment 5 4 Consultation 7 5 Existing Environment 8 5.1 Nature Conservation Designations 8 5.2 Physical and Chemical Environment 11 5.2.1 Coastal Processes and Hydrodynamics 11 5.2.2 Marine Water and Sediment Quality 12 5.3 Biological Environment 13 5.3.1 Benthic Ecology 13 5.3.2 Fish Ecology 13 5.3.3 Marine Mammals 14 5.3.4 Ornithology 15 5.4 Human Environment 16 5.4.1 Commercial and Recreational Navigation 16 5.4.2 Commercial and Recreational Fisheries 17 5.4.3 Archaeology and Historic Environment 17 5.4.4 Other Commercial and Recreational Activities 18 5.4.5 Coastal Protection and Flood Defence 20 6 Predicted Impacts and Recommended Mitigation Measures 22 6.1 Environmental Impacts 22 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 ii O p e n 6.2 Water Framework Directive Compliance Assessment 31 6.3 Cumulative Impact Assessment 31 7 Conclusions 33 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 iii O p e n Non- Technical Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this NTS This ‘Non-Technical Summary’ (NTS) provides an overview of the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process relating to DHB’s application for a Marine Licence to dredge aggregate from the Goodwin Sands, and reported in the Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement (ES). The NTS is a standalone document which aims to use non-technical language – where possible – to describe the background to and need for the proposed Goodwin Sands aggregate dredging scheme (hereafter referred to as the proposed dredging scheme), and how it complies with the current marine licensing and regulatory regime. It describes the proposed dredging scheme, the baseline environmental conditions, the main predicted positive (beneficial) and negative (adverse) environmental impacts, and the recommended mitigation measures that are to be put in place to prevent or reduce significant adverse impacts. The ES and NTS have been prepared in accordance with the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended by the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amended) Regulations 2011), so as to provide the necessary supporting information for the required marine licence. The NTS summarises the ES and, although its format broadly follows that of the ES, some changes have been made so as to provide a more readable and concise summary. Photographs, tables and figures have been included to illustrate certain points or features; it should be noted that the figures are those provided in the ES, but without the typical figure template which provides information on the source of the data, figure version, etc. 1.2 The Proposed Dredging Scheme The Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Scheme (hereafter referred to as the proposed dredging scheme) is a component of DHB’s wider development within the Western Docks at the Port of Dover (the Port), known as the Dover Western Docks Revival (DWDR) development. As part of the DWDR development there is a requirement for aggregate (i.e. sand) for land reclamation works and berth construction works. It is proposed that up to 2.5 million m3 of aggregate will be dredged from the South Goodwin Sands and transported along a vessel transit route to the DWDR site at the Port. The proposed dredge area, vessel transit route and the Port are shown in Figure 1.1. The location of the proposed dredge area is within the South Goodwin Sands sandbank system. The Goodwin Sands sandbank system is a dynamic, highly mobile environment that contains significant volumes of aggregate resource of various grading for coastal defence, coastal development and construction to supply a range of markets and projects. This important aggregate resource includes South Sand Head, Area 342 (an area historically dredged by DHB as a source of aggregate for port development), 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 1 385000 390000 395000 400000 ± 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 7 7 6 6 5 5 Legend: Proposed Dredge Area Vessel Transit Route 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 6 6 5 5 Client: Project: Dover Harbour Goodwin Sands Board Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Title: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Vessel Transit Route 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 Figure: Drawing No: 1.1 PB2107/ES/013 Revision: Date: Drawn: Checked: Size: Scale: 02 09/03/2016 JE DC A4 1:100,000 Port of Dover 01 11/11/2015 JE DC A4 1:100,000 Co-ordinate system: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 31N 0 2 4 © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. Charts from MarineFIND.co.uk © Crown copyright, 2015. 0 0 0 Kilometres All rights reserved. Licence No EK001-0645-MF0095. Not to be used for navigation. 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 5 385000 390000 395000 400000 5 O p e n 1.3 Need for the Proposed Dredging Scheme The proposed dredging scheme is required to construct the DWDR development. The DWDR development will bring major regeneration to the Port’s Western Docks and maintain current jobs while creating new ones (Port of Dover, 2015). The existing cargo facilities at the Eastern Docks are constrained by land space and berth size and DHB wishes to expand its cargo business and provide larger and improved facilities for customers. The DWDR scheme will create new land space for the construction of new cargo handling facilities and the relocation of the cargo terminal from the Eastern Docks to the Western Docks will enable its expansion to meet customers’ requirements. The DWDR scheme will also create a new marina and waterfront and provide a significant addition to the leisure and amenity offering of Dover. 1.4 Structure of this NTS This section of the NTS (Section 1) provides an introduction and details of how to access or request copies of the ES, while Section 2 provides a summary of the proposed works. Section 3 provides a summary of the relevant legislation, consenting requirements and explains why an EIA was needed. Section 4 provides a summary of the consultation undertaken with key stakeholders to inform the EIA process. Section 5 describes, in summary, the existing baseline environmental conditions of the study area. Section 6 summarises the predicted impacts of the proposed dredging scheme on the physical, chemical, biological and human environment, and provides more details of the major and moderate negative and positive impacts to provide the reader with an understanding of how these impacts were established. All predicted impacts and proposed mitigation measures are presented in a summary table. Section 6 also summarises the cumulative impacts predicted (that is, the impacts of the proposed dredging scheme in cumulation with the impacts of other plans and proposed projects about which sufficient information is available to inform the assessment). Section 6 also summarises the findings of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) compliance assessment. This assessment is subject to different regulatory procedures to the EIA process. Finally, Section 7 presents the overall conclusions of the EIA process. 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 1 O p e n 2 Project Description 2.1 Introduction DHB is proposing to dredge up to 2.5 million m3 of aggregate (generally comprising fine to coarse sand) from South Goodwin Sands, located approximately 19km north east of the Port of Dover. Dredging will be undertaken using one or two trailing suction hopper dredgers (TSHDs) and the aggregate will be transported within the dredger(s) along a vessel transit route to the DWDR site at the Port’s Western Docks for use as fill material for land reclamation works and bund construction works. The proposed dredge area is located on the western side of South Goodwin Sands (see Figure 1.1). It covers an area of 3.9km2 and extends from the Kellet Gut channel south west along the western side of the South Calliper sandbank.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010)
    Department for Culture, Media and Sport Architecture and Historic Environment Division Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010) Compiled by English Heritage for the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites. Text was also contributed by Cadw, Historic Scotland and the Environment and Heritage Service, Northern Ireland. s e vi a D n i t r a M © Contents ZONE ONE – Wreck Site Maps and Introduction UK Designated Shipwrecks Map ......................................................................................3 Scheduled and Listed Wreck Sites Map ..........................................................................4 Military Sites Map .................................................................................................................5 Foreword: Tom Hassall, ACHWS Chair ..........................................................................6 ZONE TWO – Case Studies on Protected Wreck Sites The Swash Channel, by Dave Parham and Paola Palma .....................................................................................8 Archiving the Historic Shipwreck Site of HMS Invincible, by Brandon Mason ............................................................................................................ 10 Recovery and Research of the Northumberland’s Chain Pump, by Daniel Pascoe ............................................................................................................... 14 Colossus Stores Ship? No! A Warship Being Lost? by Todd Stevens ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Ship, Northeastern Victory, Which Was Wrecked on the Goodwin Saiids in 1946
    The American ship, Northeastern Victory, which was wrecked on the Goodwin Saiids in 1946 £\) THE DOVER SOCIETY FOUNDED IN 1988 Registered with the Civic trust, Affiliated to the Kent Federation of Amenity Societies Registered Charity No. 299954 PRESIDENTS Brigadier M aurice A therton CBE VICE-PRESIDENTS: Howard Blackett, Ivan Green, Peter Johnson, Miss Lillian Kay, Peter Marsh, The Rt. Hon. The Lord Rees, Jonathan Sloggett, Tferry Sutton, Miss Christine Waterman, Jack Woolford and Martin Wright THE COMMITTEE C h airm an & Press Secretary: Tbrry Sutton MBE 17 Bewsbury Cross Lane, Whitfield, Dover CT16 3HB Tfel: 01304 820122 V ice-Ch a irm a n: Derek Leach OBE 24 Riverdale, River, Dover CT17 OGX Tfel: 01304 823926 H o n . Secretary: William Naylor "Wood End", 87 Leybume Road, Dover CT16 1SH Tfel: 01304 211276 H o n . T reasurer: Mike Weston 71 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 202059 M embership Secretary: Sheila Cope 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tfel: 01304 211348 Social Secretary: Joan Liggett 19 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1HA Tfel: 01304 214886 E ditor: Merril Lilley 5 East Cliff, Dover CT16 1LX Tfel: 01304 205254 C hairm an of P lanning S ub-Com m ittee: Jack Woolford 1066 Green Lane, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3AR Tfel: 01304 330381 Cowgate P roject C o-o r d in a io r : Hugh Gordon 59 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 205115 A rchivist: Dr S.S.G. H ale 34 Church Hill, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3DR Tfel: 01304 825670 Jeremy Cope, Lesley Gordon, Anthony Lane, Mike McFarnell, Ken Wraight Content 2 EDITORIAL 4 PLANNING
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Plan for Broadstairs 2016
    AN ECONOMIC PLAN FOR BROADSTAIRS 2016 In 1851 Charles Dickens wrote Our English Watering Place, an essay to his favourite seaside holiday resort – Broadstairs: ‘since I have been idling at the window here, the tide has risen. The boats are dancing on the bubbling water; the colliers are afloat again; the white-bordered waves rush in; the children Do chase the ebbing Neptune, and do fly him When he comes back; the radiant sails are gliding past the shore, and shining on the far horizon; all the sea is sparkling, heaving, swelling up with life and beauty, this bright morning’ Our English Watering Place, Charles Dickens (1851) CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2. Background 3 Broadstairs & St Peter's Coastal Community Team 4. Local area 5. Community 6. Economy 7. Related Initiatives 8. Ambition 9. Needs of the community 10. SWOT analysis 11. Data 12 Delivering the Plan 12.1 Key projects 12.2 Short term goals/ actions for the first 6 months 12.3. Medium term goals/actions 12.4 Performance measures 12.5. Long term goals: strategic plan beyond 5 years 12.6 Barriers 12.7 Resources 12.8 Costs 12.9 Value 12.10 Funding 12.11. Maximising resources 13 Communications 13.1. Consultation 13.2. Communication and Engagement with partners and other bodies 13.3 Communication with community 14 Logistics 14.1. Management of the Team. 14.2 Support Structure 14.3 Costs 14.4 Sustainability 14.5 Areas of Specific Interest 1. INTRODUCTION Broadstairs & St Peter's is a charming and attractive resort town situated on the Isle of Thanet, on the eastern edge of Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime (PDF, 1.2
    South East Research Framework Resource Assessment and Research Agenda for Maritime (2012 with additions in 2013 and 2019) Maritime Gustav Milne (with contributions by Luke Barber, Polydora Baker, Joe Flatman and Dave Hooley) Contents Resource Assessment ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Submerged Landscapes...................................................................................... 2 The Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (with Dr J Flatman) ............................ 3 Nautical archaeology in south-east England: a resource assessment .................... 7 Figure 1 The Dover Bronze Age boat under excavation. Kent County Council . 10 Nautical Archaeology underwater, on land and in the inter-tidal zone (including a summary of marine management practice by Dave Hooley) ............................. 10 Wrecks and Hulks ............................................................................................. 11 Boats, 'barges' and ships ................................................................................... 12 Small boats ........................................................................................................ 13 Boats ................................................................................................................. 14 'Barges' .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seascape Character Assessment Report
    Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally Marshall First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Kate Ahern 1.0 Kate Ahern Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris Graham, MMO Comments David Hutchinson 2.0 Kate Ahern Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Sweeting Independent QA © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy
    EB 11.14b Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy Appendix 1: Theme 4b The District’s Maritime Coast – Wrecks 1 | P a g e PROJECT: Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy DOCUMENT NAME: Theme 4(b): Wrecks Version Status Prepared by Date V01 INTERNAL DRAFT F Clark 18.01.17 Comments - First draft of text. No illustrations, photographs or figures. Need to finalise references. Could add to “Unprotected Wrecks” with data from HER if needed? Version Status Prepared by Date V02 RETURNED DRAFT D Whittington 16.11.18 Update back from FHDC Version Status Prepared by Date V03 CONSULTATION DRAFT F Clark 29.11.18 Comments – Check through and title page inserted. Version Status Prepared by Date V04 Version Status Prepared by Date V05 2 | P a g e 4(b) Wrecks 1. Summary The Channel and Strait of Dover is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world. They have been the setting for a range of maritime activities and events going back to ancient times which also reflects the growing importance of various ports along the Kentish coastline, such as the Cinque Ports. The Channel has seen the arrival of invasion fleets and raiding vessels going back to the Roman period, and has been the scene of a number of naval conflicts. It has often acted as a frontline defence during times of warfare, and then in times of peace is an important trading route for both visiting vessels and those on route to other national and international ports. It is therefore unsurprising that a number of vessels have been lost to the sea over the years and now comprise a valuable collection of wrecks off the coast of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodwin Sands Shipwrecks a Ta Lk Bij Anthony Lane Reported by May Jones and Merril Lilley
    Goodwin Sands Shipwrecks A ta lk bij Anthony Lane Reported by May Jones and Merril Lilley IKE MANY OTHER coastal dwellers knocking at the door of a suspect house, the good folk of Deal had a the owner was was busily disposing of the Lreputation for being more contraband. Strangely, thirty years later, interested in the booty provided by an o th er M ahratta, also carrying tea, was wrecked ships than in the fate of the wrecked in the same place. crews and stories of battles between The Goodwins are notorious for revenue men and would-be smugglers wrecks and there are countless stories were commonplace. told of them over the centuries, tales of In his well illustrated talk, Dr. Lane sunken galleons and treasure waiting to quoted one of the few actually be found. Deal was a thriving town and authenticated cases, which occurred in always busy with sailors coming ashore 1909. A merchant vessel, the Mahratta, for food and other pleasures. Sometimes ran aground and tea, a commodity as many as five hundred ships might be subject to duty, began to find its way anchored in the Downs. Dr. Lane told us ashore. As the customs officer came many accounts of wrecks on the Sands, Probably the most infamous recent wreck on the Goodwin Sands was the American freighter Helena Modjeska, which went aground off Deal and broke in two in 1946. The ship carried 5,000 tons of food, of which a fair amount was smuggled ashore to supplement the restricted and rationed diet of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Analysis of the Goodwin Sands and the Brake Bank Author(S): R
    Hydrographic Analysis of the Goodwin Sands and the Brake Bank Author(s): R. L. Cloet Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 120, No. 2 (Jun., 1954), pp. 203-215 Published by: The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1791536 Accessed: 10-10-2019 09:26 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1791536?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 185.71.73.245 on Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:26:35 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms HYDROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE GOODWIN SANDS AND THE BRAKE BANK R. L. CLOET ofThere the Goodwinmust be Sands.few mariners Together whowith arethe ignorantBrake Bank, of thethe Sands existence form anda the dangers distinct submarine morphological unit, much less complex than the banks in Figure i the Thames Estuary, or the series of sandbanks off the Franco-Belgian shore- line.1 Because of this relative simplicity we are in a position to analyse the movements in which the two banks are subject (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Territorialisation of Temporarily Exposed English Sandbanks For
    Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, v6n1 — Hayward Gaming e Tide: e territorialisation of temporarily exposed English sandbanks for social cricket events Philip Hayward University of Technology Sydney, and Southern Cross University, Australia [email protected] Publication Information: Received 16 March 2017, Accepted 21 June 2017, Available online 28 June 2017 doi: 10.21463/jmic.2017.06.1.01 Abstract Over the last 200 years a number of sandbanks that rise above the surface of the sea or river estuaries for brief periods during low tide points have been site of cricket matches organised by teams based in adjacent coastal areas. The most regular locations for such performances have been the Goodwin Sands (an area of sandbanks located in the English Channel, close to the coast of the English county of Kent) and the Bramble Bank in the Solent. Other locations, such as banks in the River Tamar, have also seen one-off events of this kind. The article identifies these sports occasions as constituting particular forms of temporary territorialisations of space that adapt aspects of the game for the conditions of rapidly changing locations. The annual matches provide an example of the human rendition of spaces as temporary island neighbourhoods, the ephemerality of which is key to their attraction and meaning. Notably, they also involve a return to conventions of traditionally recognised ‘fair play’ in cricket that have significantly diminished in the modern form of the game. In this manner, the temporary spaces of the sandbanks allow for a revival of customs that relate to earlier participatory performance traditions and allow these to be re-affirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loss of the South Goodwin Lightship LV-90
    Home About Me Contact Blog MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGY, MARITIME HISTORY The Loss of The South Goodwin Lightship LV-90 “…The South Goodwin Lightship Search could just be seen, a dim red barque Search … !! married forever to the same compass point and condemned, like a property ship on the stage of Drury Lane, to watch a diorama of waves and clouds sail busily into the wings. Without papers or passengers or cargo, it lay anchored forever to the departure point which was also its destination….anchored to the gates of a graveyard.” Ian Fleming, Moonraker The Danger of Lightship Duty Although life aboard a lightship was routine and monotonous, it was beset with moments that were a true test of courage. The unfortunate story that this blog post is going to relate is a perfect testament to the danger of lightship duty. I wanted to continue the theme of the previous blog posts regarding my research into LV-95 by relating a story of survival that illustrates both the inherent hazard and therefore the importance of lightship duty. Lightships have long since been eclipsed by modern technology with the last American lightship Nantucket being taken off station in 1985 and the LV- 95 being taken off station from the port of Milwaukee by the installation of a radio beacon. It is the feeling of this author that people have forgotten what these ships are and what they did. I have recently obtained the rare model kit of the South Goodwin produced by Revell not knowing the tragic history behind this ship and that is my inspiration for this blog post.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Wrecks in the UK S1
    Wrecks designated under Section 1 of the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Name of Wreck Date of Designation Area Latitude Longitude Exclusion Zone Year of Sinking ADMIRAL GARDNER 03.06.1985 (re designated Trinity Bay, Goodwin Sands, off Deal, 51 12.0305N 001 30.4563E 300m 1809 03.01.1990) (amended Kent 05.10.2004) AMSTERDAM 05.02.1974 Bulverhythe, East Sussex (National Grid 50 50 48.84N 000 31 27.41E 100m 1749 Reference: TQ 77800 08300) ANNE 20.06.1974 (amended Pett Level, near Cliff End, East Sussex 50 53.45N 000 41.76E 100m 1690 25.09.2009) NEEDLES SITE (ASSURANCE & HMS 11.04.1974 (amended Needles, Isle of Wight 50 39.70N 001 35.43W 200m 1738 & 1811 POMONE) 29.07.1998) BARTHOLOMEW LEDGES WRECK 03.10.1980 (Amended 17th St Mary's Sound, Isles of Scilly 49 54.364N 006 19.889W 150m Potentially 1597 May 2006) CATTEWATER WRECK 05.09.1973 (amended Plymouth, Devon 50 21.690N 004 07.625W 50m 1530 25.03.1975) CHURCH ROCKS WRECK 12.08.1977 Teignmouth, Devon SX 9465 7330 Grid reference for 16th Century SX 9480 7330 designated zone SX 9465 7312 listed in latitude SX 9480 7312 and longitude COLOSSUS 18.08.2017 St Mary's Roads, Isles of Scilly Rectangle with corners at: Co-ordinates of 1798 designated zone (N) 49.92688286N 006.34111824W listed in latitude (E) 49.92371411N 006.33617442W and longitude (S) 49.91861193N 006.34401542W (W) 49.92178068N 006.34895924W CORONATION (Offshore) 31.03.1978 Off Rame Head / Penlee Point, Cornwall 50 18.57N 004 11.98W 150m 1691 CORONATION (Inshore) 03.01.1989 Off Lady Cove, Penlee
    [Show full text]
  • On the Trail of Treasure Said to Ment for Permission to \U25a0 Are at the Present Moment Lean! About the Year 1808
    | November 4, | Magazine Section] Los Angeles Herald Sunday Supplement. 19Oe>l JONAHS OF THE DEEP a vessel owner realizes that he is she, went ashore on Dungeness in a storm, but the proprietor of a "hoodoo" ship he was towed off unhurt. A German bark ran W~~*IHEN\u25a0\u25a0— prepares to accept the inevitable and into her and sank itself the year following, with- &&\u25a0£&( get rid of bad bargain as best he nan. out doing much damage to the Hardacre, which a became known aa Once a vessel has achieved such a rep- the "Hard-to-Kill." utation, a blight seems to descend After driving ashore near Yarmouth in a fog, upon all the persons connected with the owner- and sinking a vessel fishing on the Newfound- ship impossible to land Banks not long afterwards, she broke down or management.' It.is almost Channel, to the get a cargo a cargo in the and was driven on French and when has been secured in it is almost impossible to get a crew. The fame coast a gale, her crew being taken off by the of the veim-l. has |gone ;to. the. farthest . corners rocket apparatus. Though posted at first as a of the earth and sailors decline all offers to sail total wreck, she was towed* off, patched up, and fjL, sent on a voyage to the Argentine, where her on her.' :*\u25a0;."''""- \u25a0 \u25a0'\u25a0-^'\u25a0\u25a0'"'''^ pilot "piled up" on b dangerous ,T,TT, H. her reef in bad .The A. Berwind was as fair a craft as ever die, ;sailed.
    [Show full text]