DOCSLIB.ORG

Acts Cited by Popular Name

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acts Cited by Popular Name ACTS CITED BY POPULAR NAME The following is an alphabetical list of popular and statutory names of Acts of Congress. The Stat- utes at Large citation following an entry is to the Act or part of the Act to which the name relates. Not all entries are classified to the United States Code. If an entry is classified mainly to a discrete part of the Code (such as a chapter or subchapter), a Code citation is set out in parentheses. If there is a short title or a short title note in the Code for an entry, a Code citation for the short title or short title note is set out on a separate line. For a complete chronological listing of Acts that have been classified to the Code together with their Code classifications and current status, see Ta- bles II and III in the Tables volumes. =============================== llllAct ofllll 1992 Olympic Commemorative Coin Act Pub. L. 111–226, Aug. 10, 2010, 124 Stat. 2389 Pub. L. 101–406, Oct. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 879 (31 Short title, see 26 U.S.C. 1 note U.S.C. 5112 note) 1921 Silver Dollar Coin Anniversary Act 1992 White House Commemorative Coin Act Pub. L. 116–286, Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4879 (31 Pub. L. 102–281, title I, May 13, 1992, 106 Stat. U.S.C. 5112 note) 133 (31 U.S.C. 5112 note) 1950 Amendment to Public Law 38 1993 White House Conference on Children, Aug. 5, 1950, ch. 592, 64 Stat. 414 Youth, and Families Pub. L. 101–501, title IX, subtitle B (§ 981 et 1951 Amendments to the Universal Military seq.), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1280 (42 U.S.C. Training and Service Act 12371 et seq.) June 19, 1951, ch. 144, title I, 65 Stat. 75 Short title, see 42 U.S.C. 12301 note Short title, see 50 U.S.C. 3801 note 1997 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations 1955 Amendments to the Universal Military Act for Recovery from Natural Disasters, and Training and Service Act for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including June 30, 1955, ch. 250, 69 Stat. 223 Those in Bosnia Short title, see 50 U.S.C. 3801 note Pub. L. 105–18, June 12, 1997, 111 Stat. 158 1959 Amendment to the Texas City Disaster Re- 1998 Supplemental Appropriations and Rescis- lief Act sions Act Pub. L. 86–381, Sept. 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 706 Pub. L. 105–174, May 1, 1998, 112 Stat. 58 1964 Amendments to the Alaska Omnibus Act 1999 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Pub. L. 88–451, Aug. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 505 (48 Act U.S.C. note prec. 21) Pub. L. 106–31, May 21, 1999, 113 Stat. 57 1979 White House Conference on the Arts Act 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Pub. L. 95–272, title I, May 3, 1978, 92 Stat. Act for Recovery from and Response to Ter- 222 (20 U.S.C. 951 note) rorist Attacks on the United States Pub. L. 107–38, Sept. 18, 2001, 115 Stat. 220 1979 White House Conference on the Humanities Act 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Fur- Pub. L. 95–272, title II, May 3, 1978, 92 Stat. ther Recovery From and Response To Terrorist 224 (20 U.S.C. 951 note) Attacks on the United States Pub. L. 107–206, Aug. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 820 1984 Act to Combat International Terrorism Pub. L. 98–533, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2706 (18 2002 Winter Olympic Commemorative Coin Act U.S.C. 3071 et seq.) Pub. L. 106–435, Nov. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 1916 (31 Short title, see 18 U.S.C. 3071 note U.S.C. 5112 note) 1984 Olympic Commemorative Coin Act 2004 District of Columbia Omnibus Authoriza- See Olympic Commemorative Coin Act tion Act Pub. L. 108–386, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2228 1988 Olympic Commemorative Coin Act Short title, see 12 U.S.C. 1811 note Pub. L. 100–141, Oct. 28, 1987, 101 Stat. 832 (31 U.S.C. 5112 note) 2005 District of Columbia Omnibus Authoriza- tion Act 1992 National Assessment of Chapter 1 Act Pub. L. 109–356, Oct. 16, 2006, 120 Stat. 2019 Pub. L. 101–305, May 30, 1990, 104 Stat. 253 Short title, see 5 U.S.C. 101 note Page 1 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 08:28 Sep 27, 2021 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5810 Sfmt 5810 D:\OLRC\DATA\ONLINE\USC-RP@117-41\INPUT\POPULARNAMES\POPULARNAMES-20210927.XY ACTS CITED BY POPULAR NAME Page 2 21st Century Community Learning Centers Act 75th Anniversary of World War II Commemora- Pub. L. 89–10, title X, part I (§ 10901 et seq.), tion Act as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, § 101, Oct. Pub. L. 115–433, Jan. 10, 2019, 132 Stat. 5523 (36 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3844 U.S.C. note prec. 101) 21st Century Cures Act 9/11 Commission Implementation Act of 2004 Pub. L. 114–255, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1033 Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. Stat. 3775 1039 Short title, see 6 U.S.C. 101 note Short title, see 42 U.S.C. 201 notes 9/11 Commission International Implementation 21st Century Department of Justice Appropria- Act of 2007 tions Authorization Act Pub. L. 110–53, title XX, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Pub. L. 107–273, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1758 Stat. 508 Short title, see 22 U.S.C. 2151 note 21st Century Emergency Communications Act of 2006 9/11 Heroes Medal of Valor Act of 2017 Pub. L. 115–276, Nov. 3, 2018, 132 Stat. 4166 (31 Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, § 671, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 U.S.C. 5111 note) Stat. 1433 (6 U.S.C. 571 et seq.) Short title, see 6 U.S.C. 101 note 9/11 Heroes Stamp Act of 2001 Pub. L. 107–67, title VI, § 652, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 21st Century IDEA Stat. 557 (39 U.S.C. 416 note) Also known as the 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act 9/11 Memorial Act Pub. L. 115–336, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5025 (44 Pub. L. 115–413, Jan. 3, 2019, 132 Stat. 5427 (54 U.S.C. 3501 note) U.S.C. 320301 note) 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act 911 Modernization Act Also known as the 21st Century IDEA Pub. L. 110–53, title XXIII, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Pub. L. 115–336, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5025 (44 Stat. 543 U.S.C. 3501 note) Short title, see 47 U.S.C. 901 note 21st Century Language Act of 2012 A.A.A. Farm Relief and Inflation Act Pub. L. 112–231, Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1619 May 12, 1933, ch. 25, 48 Stat. 31 Short title, see 1 U.S.C. 1 note Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and De- Pub. L. 111–291, title VI, Dec. 8, 2010, 124 velopment Act Stat. 3134 Pub. L. 108–153, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1923 (15 Abaca Production Act of 1950 U.S.C. 7501 et seq.) Aug. 10, 1950, ch. 673, 64 Stat. 435 (50 U.S.C. Short title, see 15 U.S.C. 7501 note 541 et seq.) 21st Century Respect Act Abandoned Barge Act of 1992 Pub. L. 116–9, title IX, § 9006, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Pub. L. 102–587, title V, subtitle C (§ 5301 et Stat. 836 seq.), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5081 Short title, see 46 U.S.C. 101 note 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution Commemoration Act Abandoned Infants Assistance Act Amendments Pub. L. 108–447, div. J, title II, Dec. 8, 2004, of 1991 118 Stat. 3348 (36 U.S.C. note prec. 101) Pub. L. 102–236, Dec. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 1812 Short title, see 42 U.S.C. 670 note 3% Withholding Repeal and Job Creation Act Pub. L. 112–56, title I, Nov. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. Abandoned Infants Assistance Act of 1988 712 Pub. L. 100–505, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2533 (42 Short title, see 26 U.S.C. 1 note U.S.C. 670 note) 400 Years of African-American History Commis- Abandoned Mine Reclamation Act of 1990 sion Act Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, subtitle A (§ 6001 et Pub. L. 115–102, Jan. 8, 2018, 131 Stat. 2248 (36 seq.), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–289 U.S.C. note prec. 101) Short title, see 30 U.S.C. 1201 note 5-Star Generals Commemorative Coin Act Abandoned Property Collection Act Pub. L. 111–262, Oct. 8, 2010, 124 Stat. 2780 (31 Mar. 12, 1863, ch. 120, 12 Stat. 820 U.S.C. 5112 note) Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 50 States Commemorative Coin Program Act Pub. L. 100–298, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 432 (43 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.) Pub. L. 104–329, title III, Oct. 20, 1996, 110 Short title, see 43 U.S.C. 2101 note Stat. 4012 Pub. L. 105–124, Dec. 1, 1997, 111 Stat. 2534 Able Seamen Act Short title, see 31 U.S.C. 5101 notes July 8, 1941, ch. 279, 55 Stat. 579 7(a) Real Estate Appraisal Harmonization Act Abolish Human Trafficking Act of 2017 Pub. L. 115–370, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5105 Pub. L. 115–392, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5250 Short title, see 15 U.S.C. 631 note Short title, see 18 U.S.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Administrative Procedureâ•Fla Suggested Classification Of
    Washington University Law Review Volume 25 Issue 3 January 1940 Administrative Procedure—A Suggested Classification of Procedures of Regulatory Agencies in the United States Department of Agriculture Ashley Sellers United States Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Administrative Law Commons, and the Agriculture Law Commons Recommended Citation Ashley Sellers, Administrative Procedure—A Suggested Classification of Procedures of Regulatory Agencies in the United States Department of Agriculture, 25 WASH. U. L. Q. 352 (1940). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol25/iss3/25 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 352 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY [Vol. 25 Saturday Morning, February 17 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE-A SUGGESTED CLASSIFICATION OF PROCEDURES OF REGULATORY AGENCIES IN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ASHLEY SELLERSt The title requires both definition and delimitation. The terms "procedure," "regulatory," and "agencies" do not go unchal- lenged, especially in these days of symposia and institutes on administrative law. For present purposes, the term "procedure" will be given a restricted meaning and will be used, in a manner especially familiar to lawyers, to describe the methods and practices relat- ing to administrative hearings. Someone has called this the "full- dress" level of administrative procedure. This description, if applicable to the procedure of any administrative agency, is hardly descriptive of that of a bureau of the Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Code: Coins, Coinage, and Currency, 31 U.S.C. §§ 301
    § 303 Page 511 TITLE 31.-MONEY AND FINANCE CLAD COINAGE INEWI settled under the authority of sections 240-243 of sec. this title shall be paid or delivered to or received by 391. Minting nnd Issuance of clad coins; denominations mint- on account of services ren- and specifications; limitations on continued any agent or attorney coins. the same ing of silver dered in connection with that claim and 392. Legal tender. shall be unlawful, any contract to the contrary not- 393. Acquisition of production capability for minting withstanding. Any person violating the provisions clad coins; public contracts and procurement. Purchase of newly mined silver. 240-243 of this title shall be deemed 394. of sections 395. Exportation, melting or treating of coins; rules and guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof regulations; violations and penalty. shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $1,000. 390. Same; forfeiture. and regulations. § 8, as added Pub. L. 89-185, § 5, 397. Rules (Pub. L. 88-558, 398. Definitions. Sept. 15, 1965, 79 Stat. 791.) CODIFICATION JOINT COMMISSION ON THE COINAGE [NEWl of this title" in the original read "Sections 240-243 § 301. Membership. "this Act" and referred to Pub. I. 88-558. For complete classification of Pub. L. 88-558, see Short Title note for The President is hereby authorized to establish a Employees' Claims Act "Military Personnel and Civilian Joint Commission on the Coinage to be composed of under section 240 of this title. of 1964" the Secretary of the Treasury as Chairman; the See- retary of Commerce; the Director of the Bureau of Chapter 7.-BUREAU OF TIlE MINT, MINTS AND the Director of the Mint; the chairman ASSAY OFFICES the Budget; and ranking minority member of the Senate Bank- § 283.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehman Caves Management Plan
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Great Basin National Park Lehman Caves Management Plan June 2019 ON THE COVER Photograph of visitors on tour of Lehman Caves NPS Photo ON THIS PAGE Photograph of cave shields, Grand Palace, Lehman Caves NPS Photo Shields in the Grand Palace, Lehman Caves. Lehman Caves Management Plan Great Basin National Park Baker, Nevada June 2019 Approved by: James Woolsey, Superintendent Date Executive Summary The Lehman Caves Management Plan (LCMP) guides management for Lehman Caves, located within Great Basin National Park (GRBA). The primary goal of the Lehman Caves Management Plan is to manage the cave in a manner that will preserve and protect cave resources and processes while allowing for respectful recreation and scientific use. More specifically, the intent of this plan is to manage Lehman Caves to maintain its geological, scenic, educational, cultural, biological, hydrological, paleontological, and recreational resources in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and current guidelines such as the Federal Cave Resource Protection Act and National Park Service Management Policies. Section 1.0 provides an introduction and background to the park and pertinent laws and regulations. Section 2.0 goes into detail of the natural and cultural history of Lehman Caves. This history includes how infrastructure was built up in the cave to allow visitors to enter and tour, as well as visitation numbers from the 1920s to present. Section 3.0 states the management direction and objectives for Lehman Caves. Section 4.0 covers how the Management Plan will meet each of the objectives in Section 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • CEO 312, Credit CARD Act: Interest Rate Increases and Rules on Unfair
    Office of Thrift Supervision Montrice Godard Yakimov RESCINDEDDepartment of the Treasury Managing Director, Compliance and Consumer Protection 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20552 • (202) 906-6173 July 13, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FROM: Montrice Godard Yakimov, Managing Director Compliance and Consumer Protection SUBJECT: Credit CARD Act: Interest Rate Increases and Rules on Unfair Practices On May 22, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (Credit CARD Act). In addition to providing a number of other important protections for consumers, the Credit CARD Act will address interest rate reductions on open end consumer credit plans. It will require institutions to: (1) Maintain reasonable methodologies for assessing the credit risk of the obligor, market conditions, or other factors upon which an annual percentage rate (APR) increase is based; (2) Not less frequently than once every six months, review accounts for which an APR has been increased since January 1, 2009 to assess whether such factors have changed, including whether any risk has declined (“Look Back” provision); (3) Reduce an APR previously increased when a reduction is indicated by the review; and (4) Provide written notice of the reasons when an increase is indicated by the review. These provisions do not become effective until August 2010. However, OTS strongly encourages institutions under its supervision to consider them now as preparations are made to comply with the Credit CARD Act, particularly with respect to the requirements of the Look Back provision. The Credit CARD Act also expands the prohibition against five practices that the OTS, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), and the National Credit Union Administration recently found to be unfair under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing Financial Services: the Glass-Steagall Act Revisited
    MODERNIZING FINANCIAL SERVICES: THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT REVISITED National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FEDERALLY-INSURED CREDIT UNIONS | NAFCU.ORG | 1 INTRODUCTION: Since the financial crisis, the credit union industry has experienced significant consolidation in the financial marketplace while the largest banks have reaped record profits and grown in both size and scope. From 2008 to 2017, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) chartered only 29 new federal credit unions while, during that same period, 2,528 credit unions closed or merged out of existence. The post-crisis regulatory environment has contributed to this decade-long trend of consolidation, but credit unions have also faced barriers to growth in the form of field of membership rules, capital requirements, and limits on interest rates, among many other restrictions. Accordingly, while it is essential to promote regulatory relief that reduces compliance burdens, credit unions also need modern rules to evolve and grow. Regulatory burden and the pressure to consolidate affects more than just the credit union industry. Community banks have experienced similar declines.1 The lack of new charters among community institutions illustrates the extent to which complex and poorly tailored regulations have put a stranglehold on growth and, by extension, limited consumer financial services. In recognition of these trends and the need for regulatory relief, Congress recently passed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155). S. 2155 garnered bipartisan support and helped alleviate some burdens associated with reporting under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the NCUA’s member business lending rules, and provided new safe harbors for compliance with federal consumer financial protection laws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
    The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act § 1692. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose (a) Abusive practices. There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy. (b) Inadequacy of laws. Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers. (c) Available non-abusive collection methods. Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts. (d) Interstate commerce. Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentalities of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce. (e) Purposes. It is the purpose of this title [15 USCS §§ 1692 et seq.] to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses. § 1692a. Definitions As used in this title [15 USCS §§ 1692 et seq.]— (1) The term "Commission" means the Federal Trade Commission. (2) The term "communication" means the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or indirectly to any person through any medium. (3) The term "consumer" means any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt. (4) The term "creditor" means any person who offers or extends credit creating a debt or to whom a debt is owed, but such term does not include any person to the extent that he receives an assignment or transfer of a debt in default solely for the purpose of facilitating collection of such debt for another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Credit CARD Act of 2009: What Did Banks Do?
    No. 13-7 The Credit CARD Act of 2009: What Did Banks Do? Vikram Jambulapati and Joanna Stavins Abstract The Credit CARD Act of 2009 was intended to prevent practices in the credit card industry that lawmakers viewed as deceptive and abusive. Among other changes, the Act restricted issuers’ account closure policies, eliminated certain fees, and made it more difficult for issuers to change terms on credit card plans. Critics of the Act argued that because of the long lag between approval and implementation of the law, issuing banks would be able to take preemptive actions that might disadvantage cardholders before the law could take effect. Using credit bureau data as well as individual data from a survey of U.S. consumers, we test whether banks closed consumers’ credit card accounts or otherwise restricted access to credit just before the enactment of the CARD Act. Because the period prior to the enactment of the CARD Act coincided with the financial crisis and recession, causality in this case is particularly difficult to establish. We find evidence that a higher fraction of credit card accounts were closed following the Federal Reserve Board’s adoption of its credit card rules. However, we do not find evidence that banks closed credit card accounts or deteriorated terms of credit card plans at a higher rate between the time when the CARD Act was signed and when its provisions became law. JEL Codes: D14, D18, G28 When this paper was written Vikram Jambulapati was a research assistant at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. He is now a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Commodities Litigation: the Impact of RICO
    DePaul Law Review Volume 34 Issue 1 Fall 1984 Article 3 Commodities Litigation: The Impact of RICO Michael S. Sackheim Francis J. Leto Steven A. Friedman Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Michael S. Sackheim, Francis J. Leto & Steven A. Friedman, Commodities Litigation: The Impact of RICO , 34 DePaul L. Rev. 23 (1984) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol34/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMODITIES LITIGATION: THE IMPACT OF RICO Michael S. Sackheim* Francis J. Leto** Steven A. Friedman*** INTRODUCTION The number of private actions commenced against commodities brokers and other professionals in the futures area has increased dramatically in the last few years. Although these lawsuits primarily have been based on viola- tions of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEAct),' the complaints have fre- quently included allegations that the federal Racketeering Influenced and Cor- rupt Organization Act (RICO)2 was also violated by the subject defendents. In invoking the racketeering laws, the plaintiff often seeks to take advantage of the treble damage provision of RICO.3 This article will analyze the application of the racketeering laws to com- mon, garden-variety commodities fraud cases. Specifically, this article addresses those cases where a brokerage firm is sued because of the illegal acts of its agents. It is the authors' contention that the treble damages pro- vision of RICO should not be applied to legitimate brokerage firms who are innocently involved in instances of commodities fraud through the acts of their agents.
    [Show full text]
  • IN TIME of EMERGENCY, a Citizen's Handbook on Nuclear Attack - Natural Disasters, Department of Defense (Dod), Office of Civil Defense, 1968
    Description of document: IN TIME OF EMERGENCY, a citizen's handbook on Nuclear Attack - Natural Disasters, Department of Defense (DoD), Office of Civil Defense, 1968 Posted date: 24-October-2016 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. This handbook is the property of: Name---------------------- Address Location of designated fallout shelter, or shelter nearest to: IIome ______________________ School ------------------­ Workplace----------------- Emergency telephone numbers:* Ambulance __________________ Civil Defense----------------- Doctors Fire IIealth Department --------------­ IIospitals ------------------ Police ______________________ Red Cross __________________ Utility Companies --------------- Weather Bureau----------------- Other _____________________ •Jn a time of nuclear attack or major natural disaster, don't use the telephone to get information or advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register Volume 32 Number 98
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 NUMBER 98 Saturday, May 20, 1967 Washington, D.C. Pages 7487-7515 Agencies in this issue— Agency for International Development Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Consumer and Marketing Service Customs Bureau Education Office Federal Aviation Administration Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration Monetary Offices National Transportation Safety Board Securities and Exchange Commission State Department Transportation Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Announcing First 10-Year Cumulation TABLES OF LAWS AFFECTED in Volumes 70-79 of the UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE Lists all prior laws and other Federal in­ public laws enacted during the years 1956- struments which were amended, repealed, 1965. Includes index of popular name or otherwise affected by the provisions of acts affected in Volumes 70-79. Price: $2.50 Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 SSN O N A t^ r m m * f ItoEW F ir i ^ I C T T r O Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or r r 11 r If /iI m S f # l l r l l l ^ I i l l on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National I AjIII j III i i i i U i t D 1 1 ^ 1 1 Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Area Code 202 Phone 962-8626 Archives Building, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Concise Encyclopedia of the Great Recession, 2007-2010
    THE CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE GREAT RECESSION 2007–2010 Jerry M. Rosenberg The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Lanham • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 2010 Published by Scarecrow Press, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.scarecrowpress.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright © 2010 by Jerry M. Rosenberg All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rosenberg, Jerry Martin. The concise encyclopedia of the great recession 2007–2010 / Jerry M. Rosenberg. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8108-7660-6 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-8108-7661-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-8108-7691-0 (ebook) 1. Financial crises—United States—History—21st century—Dictionaries. 2. Recessions—United States—History—21st century—Dictionaries. 3. Financial institutions—United States—History—21st century—Dictionaries. I. Title. HB3743.R67 2010 330.9'051103—dc22 2010004133 ϱ ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America For Ellen Celebrating fifty years of love and adventure. She is my primary motivation. As a lifelong partner, Ellen keeps me spirited and vibrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalié Jiménez Professor of Law
    Dalié Jiménez Professor of Law Written Testimony of Dalié Jiménez Professor of Law University of California, Irvine School of Law Before the: U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services September 26, 2019 10 a.m. Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C. Witness Background Statement Dalié Jiménez is a Professor of Law at the UC Irvine School of Law where she teaches courses on bankruptcy, consumer financial regulation, and contracts. Professor Jiménez is one of three principal investigators in the Financial Distress Research Project, a large-scale, longitudinal, randomized control trial evaluating the effectiveness of legal and counseling interventions to help individuals in financial distress. The project has received generous financial support from the National Science Foundation, the American Bankruptcy Institute, the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges, and the Arnold Foundation, among others. Individuals enrolled in the study have all been sued in a debt collection proceeding in Connecticut small claims court. A member of the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Consumer Bankruptcy Commission, Professor Jiménez has published half a dozen articles examining debt collection, bankruptcy, and student loans. Professor Jiménez spent a year as part of the founding staff of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau working on debt collection, debt relief, credit reporting, and student loan issues. Prior to her academic career, she clerked for the Honorable Juan R. Torruella of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, was a litigation associate at Ropes & Gray in Boston, and managed consumer protection issues for a Massachusetts state senator. A cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School, Professor Jiménez also holds dual B.S.
    [Show full text]