Istoxx® Italy Small Mid Cap Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ISTOXX® ITALY SMALL MID CAP INDEX Components1 Company Supersector Country Weight (%) TELECOM ITALIA RNC Telecommunications IT 4.52 ENAV SPA Industrial Goods & Services IT 4.37 REPLY Technology IT 4.31 UNIPOLSAI Insurance IT 3.85 TECHNOGYM Personal & Household Goods IT 3.69 IMA IND MACCHINE Industrial Goods & Services IT 3.65 ERG Utilities IT 3.56 ANIMA HOLDING Financial Services IT 3.54 AUTOGRILL Travel & Leisure IT 3.30 DE LONGHI Personal & Household Goods IT 3.24 BRUNELLO CUCINELLI Personal & Household Goods IT 3.24 ACEA Utilities IT 2.74 ASTM Industrial Goods & Services IT 2.69 BCA POPOLARE DI SONDRIO Banks IT 2.61 TAMBURI INV.PARTNERS SPA Financial Services IT 2.48 SALVATORE FERRAGAMO Personal & Household Goods IT 2.42 MEDIASET Media IT 2.26 SARAS Oil & Gas IT 2.05 FALCK RENEWABLES Utilities IT 2.03 MARR Retail IT 1.89 BANCA FARMAFACTORING S.P.A. Financial Services IT 1.88 BANCA MONTE DEI PASCHI Banks IT 1.82 ILLIMITY BANK Banks IT 1.78 TOD'S GRP Personal & Household Goods IT 1.78 RAI WAY Media IT 1.66 ITALMOBILIARE Industrial Goods & Services IT 1.60 DoValue Financial Services IT 1.57 BUZZI UNICEM RSP Construction & Materials IT 1.53 ASCOPIAVE Utilities IT 1.50 GRUPPO MUTUIONLINE Financial Services IT 1.47 IMPREGILO Construction & Materials IT 1.40 CAREL INDUSTRIES SPA Construction & Materials IT 1.40 PIAGGIO Automobiles & Parts IT 1.31 CREDITO VALTELLINESE Banks IT 1.24 FINCANTIERI Industrial Goods & Services IT 1.18 GUALA CLOSURES Industrial Goods & Services IT 1.18 BANCA IFIS Financial Services IT 1.14 JUVENTUS Travel & Leisure IT 1.12 MAIRE TECNIMONT Oil & Gas IT 1.11 SOL Chemicals IT 1.05 CREDITO EMILIANO Banks IT 1.05 DANIELI & C RSP Industrial Goods & Services IT 0.97 IMMOBILIARE GRANDE DIST. SPA Real Estate IT 0.96 FILA Personal & Household Goods IT 0.96 OVS Personal & Household Goods IT 0.89 CEMENTIR HOLDING Construction & Materials IT 0.87 AVIO Industrial Goods & Services IT 0.73 ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDI. Media IT 0.67 CIR CIE.INDI.RIUN. Automobiles & Parts IT 0.65 DATALOGIC Industrial Goods & Services IT 0.58 CAIRO COMMUNICATION Media IT 0.47 1 Based on the composition as of Jan. 31, 2020.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Capital FI SRI - PVC H USD
April 2021 Lazard Capital FI SRI - PVC H USD International bonds and debt securities Share classes ISIN code* NAV $ Net assets ($ million) Total net assets (€ million) PVC H-USD Unit FR0013072733 1 603,87 5,24 821,14 * Not all share classes of the relevant sub-fund are registered for marketing in German and Austria MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT POLICY The fund’s investment objective is to outperform the Barclays Global Contingent Capital € Hedged index for units PVC EUR, PVD EUR, RVC EUR, RVD EUR, SC EUR and TVD EUR, Barclays Global Contingent Capital Hedged USD for unit PVC H-USD and Barclays Global Contingent Capital Hedged CHF for PVC H-CHF. To attain this objective, the strategy will rely on an active management of the portfolio mainly invested in subordinated securities (this type of debt is more risky than Senior Unsecured or Securitized debts), or any securities, not considered as common stocks, issued by European financial institutions. The investment process combine both a Top-down approach (strategic and geographical allocation approach which takes into consideration the macro and sectorial environments) and a Bottom-up approach (stock-picking based on fundamental analysis of the issuer and its securities) and then integrating the regulatory environment in which this asset class evolves. The modified duration will be managed in a 0 to 8 range. The fund only invests in bonds or securities issued by companies having their head office in an OECD member country and/or in issues or securities listed in a stock market of one of these countries.The FCP invests only in obligations negotiated in Euro, USD or Sterling.
[Show full text]
Fitch Places 31 EMEA Bank ST Issuer Ratings Under Criteria Observation
5/7/2019 [ Press Release ] Fitch Places 31 EMEA Bank ST Issuer Ratings Under Criteria Observation Fitch Places 31 EMEA Bank ST Issuer Ratings Under Criteria Observation Fitch Ratings-London-07 May 2019: Fitch Ratings has placed 31 Short-Term (ST) Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) and related ST debt level ratings of EMEA-based banks Under Criteria Observation (UCO) following the publication of its cross-sector criteria for Short-Term Ratings on 2 May 2019. A full list of rating actions is below. Fitch intends to conclude full implementation of the criteria, and resolution of all UCO designations within six months of the designation. KEY RATING DRIVERS The ST ratings of the affected banks are determined primarily by correspondence tables linking short-term to long-term ratings. The new ST rating criteria introduced changes to our correspondence table between long-term and ST ratings. Two new cusp points at 'A' and 'BBB+' have been added to the existing three cusp points ('A+', 'A-' and 'BBB'), where baseline or higher ST ratings can be assigned. For banks with Long-Term IDRs driven by their standalone profile, as reflected by their Viability Ratings (VR), Fitch uses the funding and liquidity factor score as the principal determinant of whether the 'baseline' or 'higher' ST IDR is assigned at each cusp point. The ST IDRs and, where relevant, associated ST debt/deposit ratings of the following issuers have been placed UCO because the ratings could be upgraded by one notch under the new criteria. This is because the latest funding and liquidity scores that feed into their VRs are at least in line with the minimum levels required for a higher ST rating under the new criteria: - Banco Cooperativo Espanol, S.A.
[Show full text]
Nota Per Il Direttore Generale
PRESS RELEASE Fintech, ABI: Italian banks are working on blockchain pilot A first group of Italian banks has begun operative testing of a blockchain. Shortly, after an initial test phase, the pilot will be extended to a larger number of banks. ABI Lab, the technological laboratory supported by the Italian Banking Association (ABI), and the banks that are participating in the project are engaged in applying blockchain technology to interbank processes with the objective of attaining the benefits derived from data transparency and visibility, the increased speed in executing transactions and the possibility of performing checks and exchanges directly within the application. Blockchain technology allows for the creation and management of a large distributed database for managing transactions that can be shared across multiple nodes of a network. In other words, it is a database in which data is not stored on a single computer, but on multiple computers, called nodes, that are connected to one another. Without having to rely on a single centralised entity, this new concept of distributed databases, Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), changes the way we think and design the relationships and the exchange of value between the participants. The scope of application is interbank reconciliation, which verifies the matching of correspondent accounts that involve two different banks that contain transactions executed between two customers of two banks. The project has also verified how the application of DLT technology can improve certain specific aspects of current operations that can result in discrepancies that are difficult for the banks to manage. Among these is the time needed to identify transactions between banks that do not match; the lack of a standard process and a single communications protocol; the limited visibility of the transactions between parties.
[Show full text]
Press Release Fitch Has Downgraded the Long Term
PRESS RELEASE FITCH HAS DOWNGRADED THE LONG TERM ISSUER DEFAULT RATINGS OF CREDITO VALTELLINESE AND THE SUBSIDIARY CREDITO ARTIGIANO FROM BBB TO BB+ OUTLOOK NEGATIVE Sondrio, 29 August 2012. Fitch Ratings has downgraded the Long-term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) of Credito Valtellinese and its subsidiary Credito Artigiano as follows: LONG TERM IDR: form (BBB) to (BB+); Outlook Negative SHORT TERM IDR: from F3 to B VIABILITY RATING: from (bbb) to (bb+). The rating actions follow a periodic review of several mid-sized banking groups. The Negative Outlook on the banks’ Long-term IDRs reflects the pressure arising from the current challenges in the operating environment. The full text of Fitch Ratings press release follows. Company contacts Investor relations Media relations telephone + 39 02 80637471 telephone + 39 02 80637403 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] FITCH DOWNGRADES 7 ITALIAN MID-SIZED BANKS; AFFIRMS 2 Fitch Ratings-Milan/London-28 August 2012: Fitch Ratings has downgraded the Long-term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) of Banca Popolare di Sondrio (BPSondrio) and Banco di Desio e della Brianza (BDB) to 'BBB+' from 'A-', and the Long-term IDR of Banca Popolare di Milano (BPMilano) to 'BBB-' from 'BBB'. The agency has also downgraded the Long-term IDRs of Banca Carige, Banca Popolare di Vicenza (BPVicenza), Credito Valtellinese (CreVal) and Veneto Banca to 'BB+' from 'BBB'. Simultaneously, Fitch has affirmed the Long-term IDRs of Banca Popolare dell'Emilia Romagna (BPER) at 'BBB' and of Credito Emiliano (Credem) at 'BBB+'. The Outlooks on all the banks' Long-term IDRs is Negative. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary.
[Show full text]
CREDITO VALTELLINESE S.P.A
BASE PROSPECTUS CREDITO VALTELLINESE S.p.A. (incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Republic of Italy) €5,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme Under the €5,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the "Programme") described in this Base Prospectus, Credito Valtellinese S.p.A. ("Credito Valtellinese" or the "Issuer") may from time to time issue certain non-equity securities in bearer form, denominated in any currency and governed by English Law (the "English Law Notes") or by Italian Law (the "Italian Law Notes", and together with the English Law Notes, the "Notes"), as described in further detail herein. The terms and conditions for the English Law Notes are set out herein in “Terms and Conditions for the English Law Notes” and the terms and conditions for the Italian Law Notes are set out herein in “Terms and Conditions for the Italian Law Notes”. References to the “Notes” shall be to the English Law Notes and/or the Italian Law Notes, as appropriate and references to the “Terms and Conditions” or the “Conditions” shall be to the Terms and Conditions for the English Law Notes and/or the Terms and Conditions for the Italian Law Notes, as appropriate. For the avoidance of doubt, in “Terms and Conditions for the English Law Notes”, references to the “Notes” shall be to the English Law Notes, and in “Terms and Conditions for the Italian Law Notes”, references to the “Notes” shall be to the Italian Law Notes. This Base Prospectus has been approved by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the "CSSF") in its capacity as competent authority in Luxembourg as a base prospectus under article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, as amended (the "Prospectus Regulation").
[Show full text]
2018 EU-Wide Transparency Exercise
2018 EU-wide transparency exercise European Banking Authority (EBA) © Management Solutions 2019. All reserved All rights Solutions 2019. Management© www.managementsolutions.com Research and Development © Management Solutions 2019. Todos los derechos reservadosFebruary Página 2019 1 Index Introduction Aggregated results Results per country Outlook and recommendations Annex © Management Solutions 2019. All rights reserved Page 2 Introduction Context and objective In December 2018 the EBA published the results of the 2018 EU-wide transparency exercise, which provide detailed information on, among others, capital, leverage, risk weighted assets (RWA), P&L, credit risk, market risk, or asset quality Introduction • The EBA has been conducting transparency exercises at the EU-wide level on an annual basis since 2011. These exercises are part of the EBA's ongoing efforts to foster transparency and market discipline in the EU financial market, and complements banks' own Pillar 3 disclosures, as laid down in the CRD IV. • Further, the transparency exercises are, unlike the stress tests, disclosure exercises where only bank-by-bank data are published and no shocks are applied to the actual data. • In this context, the EBA has published the results of the EU-wide 2018 transparency exercise1, which will facilitate the consistent comparison and assessment of the resilience of banks across time and at a country and a bank-by-bank level. In particular, this document assesses the results relative to the potential impact on: • Capital (CET1 phase-in and
[Show full text]
Elenco Dei Soggetti Richiedenti Che Operano Con Il Fondo, Con Specifica
Elenco dei soggetti richiedenti che operano con il Fondo – account abilitati all’utilizzo della procedura telematica - Ottobre 2020 (informativa ai sensi del Piano della Trasparenza - parte X delle Disposizioni operative) DENOMINAZIONE SOGGETTO RICHIEDENTE COGNOME NOME E-MAIL TELEFONO AAREAL BANK MAZZA ANTONIO [email protected] 0683004228 AAREAL BANK CIPOLLONE LORELLA [email protected] 0683004305 AGFA FINANCE ITALY SPA CRIPPA ANTONELLA [email protected] 023074648 AGFA FINANCE ITALY SPA BUSTI FILIPPO [email protected] AGRIFIDI ZAPPA GIUSEPPE [email protected] 3371066673 AGRIFIDI EMILIA ROMAGNA TEDESCHI CARLO ALBERTO [email protected] 05211756120 AGRIFIDI MODENA REGGIO FERRARA TINCANI ENNIO EMANUELE [email protected] 059208524 AGRIFIDI UNO EMILIA ROMAGNA EVANGELISTI CARLOTTA [email protected] 0544271787 AGRIFIDI UNO EMILIA ROMAGNA MONTI LUCA [email protected] 0544271787 A-LEASING SPA LOMBARDO CLAUDIO [email protected] 0422409820 ALLIANZ BANK FINANCIAL ADVISORS PISTARINO FRANCA [email protected] 0131035420 ALLIANZ BANK FINANCIAL ADVISORS CORIGLIANO FABIO [email protected] 0272168085 ALLIANZ BANK FINANCIAL ADVISORS CHIARI STEFANO [email protected] 0272168518 ALLIANZ BANK FINANCIAL ADVISORS CANNIZZARO FEDERICO [email protected] 3421650350 ALLIANZ BANK FINANCIAL ADVISORS KOFLER SAMUEL [email protected] 3466001059 ALLIANZ BANK FINANCIAL ADVISORS FERRARI PIERO [email protected] 3477704188 ALLIANZ
[Show full text]
Italy's Less Significant Banks: General Overview and Supervision
Italy’s less significant banks: general overview and supervision On 30 June 2016, Italy’s less significant institutions (LSIs), directly supervised by the Bank of Italy within the framework of Europe’s Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), numbered 462, of which 355 were mutual cooperative banks (banche di credito cooperativo or BCCs). LSIs in Italy comprise about 8,700 branches and 74,000 bank employees, while the entire Italian banking system consists of 29,000 branches and 292,000 bank employees; LSIs account for 18 per cent of the banking system’s total assets. The average value of an LSI’s total assets came to just over €1 billion, against an average of €165 billion for significant institutions (SIs). On the same date, the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio for LSIs averaged 15.5 per cent, about 4 percentage points more than in 2011 (the CET1 ratio for SIs was 11.7 per cent, representing an increase of 3 percentage points on 2011). Non-performing loans (net of value adjustments) as a share of total loans (NPL ratio) averaged 12.5 per cent (it was 10.5 per cent for SIs). The coverage ratio averaged 43.6 per cent (46.6 per cent for SIs); however, among LSIs there was greater recourse to guarantees. The increase in the coverage ratio recorded on average by LSIs in recent years was starkly higher than that for SIs. In the first half of 2016, the profitability of LSIs, net of extraordinary effects, was in line with that of SIs. The cost- income ratio was substantially similar for LSIs and SIs.
[Show full text]
Methodology of Comparison 2013
METHODOLOGY OF COMPARISON 2013 Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Performance Methodological Remarks Convinced that a comparison of environmental, social and governance performance is of interest, not only to the Company itself, but also to its stakeholders, certain comparisons between Terna’s results and those of other com- panies are included in the 2013 Sustainability Report, as was the case in the preceding three years. Listed below are the main criteria adopted in the analysis, as an introduction to the reading and interpretation of the comparisons of individual indicators in the Report: • three panels of companies were identified: an industry panel, composed of the European transmission system operators and the major extra-European operators in terms of kilometres of lines managed; and two multi- industry panels, the first relative to large Italian companies (the 40 companies of the FTSE-MIB at 18 December 2013) and the second relative to the best international performers (the 24 world Sustainability Industry Group Leaders, identified by the RobecoSAM sustainability rating agency and disclosed at the publishing of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index of September 2013). The purpose of the three panels is to guarantee, also relative to the type of indicator reviewed, a comparison between companies with the same operational characteristics, an Italian comparison, and a comparison with the top international performers. The Terna figures do not contribute to the calculation of the average in the case of the RobecoSAM – Supersector Leaders panel; • the companies considered from among those in the three panels were those which publicise the information necessary for comparisons either on their websites, through the Sustainability Report (even if not prepared following the GRI guidelines) or through other documentation (HSE Report, financial report, etc.).
[Show full text]
An Analysis of the Level of Qualitative Efficiency for the Equity Research Reports in the Italian Financial Market
http://ijba.sciedupress.com International Journal of Business Administration Vol. 9, No. 2; 2018 An Analysis of the Level of Qualitative Efficiency for the Equity Research Reports in the Italian Financial Market Paola Fandella1 1 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy Correspondence: Paola Fandella, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy. Received: January 15, 2018 Accepted: February 6, 2018 Online Published: February 8, 2018 doi:10.5430/ijba.v9n2p21 URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v9n2p21 Abstract Corporate reports issued by various financial intermediaries play a major role in investment decisions. For this reason, it is particularly interesting to understand the accuracy of the forecasts, by carrying out an empirical analysis of the "equity research" system in Italy, identifying structural features, degree of reliability and incidence in the market. The choice of the analysis of the efficiency level information on the Italian market proposes to assess the interest of equity research of a niche market (339 listed companies in 2017) but with characteristics of potential growth such as having been acquired by LSEGroup in 2007, the 6th stock-exchange group at international level for the number of listed companies and the 4th for capitalization. The analysis was carried out on the reports issued on companies belonging to the Ftse Mib stock index during a period of 5 years. It aims to analyse the composition of the equity research system in Italy as well as the analysts' ability to properly evaluate the stocks' fair price, so as to test their degree of reliability and detect possible anomalies in recommendations to the investors.
[Show full text]
Of the Ftse-Mib Companies
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE MASTER’S DEGREE IN CORPORATE FINANCE INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES IN ITALY: SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF THE FTSE-MIB COMPANIES SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Prof. Saverio Bozzolan Guido Biagio Sallemi SUPERVISOR Prof. Riccardo Tiscini ACADEMIC YEAR 2018-19 1 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The interlocking literature ............................................................................................................ 9 2.1. Theory behind the interlocking directorates .......................................................................... 9 2.2. Relevant cases and findings in SNA Literature................................................................... 11 3. Methodological Section .............................................................................................................. 15 3.1. Social network Analysis ...................................................................................................... 15 3.2. Basic Graphs Taxonomy ..................................................................................................... 16 3.3. Vertex Degree and related metrics ...................................................................................... 19 3.4. Centrality measures ............................................................................................................. 20 3.5. Network Cohesion
[Show full text]
Comparison Methodology
COMPARISON METHODOLOGY Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Performance Convinced that a comparison of environmental, social and governance performance is of interest, not only to the Company itself, but also to its stakeholders, certain comparisons between Terna’s results and those of other companies are included in the 2015 Sustainability Report, as was the case in previous years. The comparative sustainability indicators regard the following themes: CO2 emissions, SF6 leakage incidence rate, hours of training per capita provided to employees and the turnover rate on termination of personnel. Listed below are the main criteria adopted in the analysis, as an introduction to the reading and interpretation of the comparisons of individual indicators in the Report: • three panels of companies were identified: the first was composed of the European transmission system operators and the major non-European operators in terms of kilometres of lines managed; the second, multi-sectoral in nature, is made up of large Italian companies (the 40 listed companies of the FTSE MIB at 31/12/2015); the third formed by the best international performers in the “Electric Utilities - ELC” sector (identified by the RobecoSAM sustainability rating agency and included in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index of September 2015). The purpose of the three panels is to guarantee, also relative to the type of indicator reviewed, a comparison between companies with the same operational characteristics, an Italian comparison, and a comparison with top international performers in the same sector; • the companies considered from among those in the three panels were those which publicise the information necessary for comparisons either on their websites, through the Sustainability Report (even if not prepared following the GRI guidelines) or through other documentation (HSE Report, Financial Report, etc.).
[Show full text]