Evil twin attack android apk Continue Evil double attack on android (alk99) root requered @abderrahaman this attack is similar to the stream and linset, but in another plate form video tuto'gt; alk99 csploit iptables binary termux android webserver (php server ) open csploit garnt superuser to install the resolution of the core new and wait, until he has finished extracting the close application en termux and wait until he did the installation type on termux : pkg install tsu pkg install git exit open server for php (or any other android webserver support php) install the newest package to copy the default page (file index ...) or page you prefer from fake pages go to you interchannel storage www and go public past it here and go to the server for the start of the hotspot your mobile phone and on the server for php choose wlan0 192.168.43.1 click on the starter server go to your browser and bring now all working clone git clone CD clone-download-Alk-evil- twin tsu bash install.sh wait Until it finishes in the view now type: exit and open termux and type: (now the server has to be launched, and the client must be connected) tsu alk99 alk99-evil-twin-on-andoid-v1 Copyright (C) 2018 by abderra in this new wireless attack, I will walk you through the process of creating Hot Spot 2.0 Evil Twinman. This is potentially another vector attack that can be used with or without social engineering that a penetration tester or nefarious actor can use when performing a wireless pen test or trying to socially engineer the user. Abuse of Hot Spot 2.0 can help the user trust the certificate. Hot Spot 2.0 misuse can expose the user to think that the network is safer when indeed it is a rogue hotspot. Once the user enters their credentials (you can also redirect users to the captured portal) and accepts the real certificate, we then perform an EAP-GTC attack to get a clear user/password text. The friendly name of the HotSpot 2.0 operator may be a change in company name, frequency or location. Go wild, it could be anything. A nefarious actor, or wireless penetration tester can create an HS Evil Twin using the same SSID and operator-friendly name as the real HS 2.0 Network.Spoofed Hot Spot 2.0 Secure Wireless Operator Friendly Name Follows to note that the iPhone network is above, for example - any network name can be used here. The legal name is Hot Spot 2.0, or the name of the WPA2 Enterprise Network used by the organization. We will insert a lot of blind trust only into SSID names, now we have another area; we can enter any line we think will to connect to the network. Another area of concern on some devices on the latest iOS is you can't remove the rogue certificate. This makes the attack more hidden and difficult to mitigate once the certificate is trusted on the device. If you change your name SSID, SSID, will be asked again for a certificate to trust. You can use this to control the testing. For comparison, if you use Mac OS, you can access the keychain and remove the certificate; this is not possible on iOS tested devices. Free Let's Encrypt CertificateIt should be noted - on Android, using Lootbooty, some versions of the operating system without prompting the user a certificate. I used my own controls that include hostapd-wpe with hostapd-2.6 to prove the concept to test if EAP-GTC downgrades still work on the latest iOS and MaC OS devices. These two devices I always target - because you can usually get clear textual powers using the mute-down EAP-GTC form, and whose supplicer has native EAP-GTC support. Windows has never had EAP-GTC authentication support. You can use the supplicant side, but Windows doesn't support EAP-GTC itself. With let's Encrypt certificate, you can effectively avoid this problem without relying on self-signed certificates. Many companies sign their certificates internally. This is not a solution to SSL's server and client problems, but another method when performing an Evil Twin attack against enterprise networks with iOS devices as wireless endpoints. Certificates from Lets Encrypt above in hostapd-wpe.confGabriel detail below, the motives for this change in the behavior of the Certificate for Windows (detailed) and explains the support for Legacy Crypto. I also recommend using eaphammer, which allows you to use self-signed certificates, and has native support for EAP-GTC attacks.s0lst1c3/eaphammerby Gabriel Ryan (s0lst1c3) (gabriel-at-specterops.io) Current release: v1.12.0Reference:Let's Encryption - Free S SSL/TLS CertificatesEAPHammer Version 0.5.0 - Legacy of Crypto SupportAdvanced Wireless Attacks Against Corporate Networks (AWAE) (v3.0.1) While Wi-Fi Networks Can Be Configured by Smart IT People, this does not mean that the users of the system are just as tech-savvy. We'll demonstrate how an evil double attack can steal Wi-Fi passwords by kicking a user out of their trusted network, creating an almost identical fake. This forces the victim to connect to a fake network and provide a Wi-Fi password to restore internet access. While a more technical user can detect this attack, it is surprisingly effective against those who are not trained to look for suspicious network activity. The reason it's so successful is that most users don't know what a real firmware update looks like, which leads to confusion in the recognition that the attack is ongoing. The evil of a double attack-like Wi-Fi attack that works taking advantage of what computers and phones will only see the name or ESSID wireless network. This actually makes it very difficult to distinguish between networks of the same name and the same kind of encryption. In B many networks will have multiple network access points, all using the same name to expand access without confusing users. If you want to see how it works, you can create a Wi-Fi hotspot on your phone and call it the same as your home network, and you'll notice that it's hard to tell the difference between two networks or your computer might just see how the same network is. A network-sniffing tool, such as Wigle Wi-Fi on Android or Kismet, can clearly see the difference between these networks, but for the average user, these networks will look the same. This is great for tricking a user into connecting if we have a network with the same name, the same password, and the same encryption, but what if we don't know the password yet? We won't be able to create a network that will trick the user into connecting automatically, but we can try a social-engineered attack to try to get the user to give us a password by kicking them out of the real network. In a captive portal-style evil double attack, we will use the Airgeddon wireless attack framework to try to get the user to connect to an open network with the same name as the network they trust. A captive portal is a kind of screen that you see when you connect to an open network in a coffee shop, on a plane or in a hotel. This screen, containing terms and conditions, is used by people to view, and we will use it to our advantage to create a phishing page that looks as if the router is being updated. Don't miss: Using Aircrack-ng to create the Evil Twin Access Point Deployment Airgeddon in the Cafe. Image Codi/Null Byte How we'll trick the victim into this by flooding their trusted network with de-authentication packages, making it impossible to connect to the internet normally. Faced with an Internet connection that refuses to connect and will not allow any access to the Internet, the average annoyed user will discover an open Wi-Fi network with the same name as the network to which they cannot connect, and assume that this is due to the problem. Don't miss: How to build Wi-Fi Jammer-based software with Airgeddon After connecting to the network, the victim will be redirected to the phishing page, explaining that the router has been updated and requires a password to continue. If the user is gullible, he enter the password network here, but that's not where the fun stops. If the victim gets annoyed by this inconvenience and type the wrong password, we need to make sure that we can say the wrong password from the correct one. To do this, we first take a handshake from the network to check each password that the user gives us, and to tell when the correct password will be entered. There are several key requirements for this attack to work. This attack requires the user to do some ignorant things. If the goal you choose is known for being tech-savvy, savvy, may not work. An advanced user, or anyone with any training on cybersecurity awareness, will detect this attack in the process and, very possibly, is aware that this is a relatively close-range attack. Against a well-protected target, you can expect this attack to be detected and even localized to find you. Secondly, the victim must be successfully checked out of his network, and be disappointed enough to join a completely unknown open network that has just appeared out of nowhere and has the same network name they trust.