DOCSLIB.ORG

An Integrated Mosquito Small RNA Genomics Resource Reveals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Integrated Mosquito Small RNA Genomics Resource Reveals bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.061598; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 2 3 An integrated mosquito small RNA genomics resource reveals 4 dynamic evolution and host responses to viruses and transposons. 5 6 7 Qicheng Ma1† Satyam P. Srivastav1†, Stephanie Gamez2†, Fabiana Feitosa-Suntheimer3, 8 Edward I. Patterson4, Rebecca M. Johnson5, Erik R. Matson1, Alexander S. Gold3, Douglas E. 9 Brackney6, John H. Connor3, Tonya M. Colpitts3, Grant L. Hughes4, Jason L. Rasgon5, Tony 10 Nolan4, Omar S. Akbari2, and Nelson C. Lau1,7* 11 1. Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry 12 2. University of California San Diego, Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and 13 Developmental Biology, La Jolla, CA 92093-0335, USA. 14 3. Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and the National 15 Emerging Infectious Disease Laboratory 16 4. Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical 17 Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK 18 5. Pennsylvania State University, Department of Entomology, Center for Infectious Disease 19 Dynamics, and the Huck Institutes for the Life Sciences 20 6. Department of Environmental Sciences, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 21 7. Boston University Genome Science Institute 22 23 * Corresponding author: NCL: [email protected] 24 † These authors contributed equally to this study. 25 26 27 28 Running title: Mosquito small RNA genomics 29 30 Keywords: mosquitoes, small RNAs, piRNAs, viruses, transposons microRNAs, siRNAs 31 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.061598; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 ABSTRACT 2 Although mosquitoes are major transmission vectors for pathogenic arboviruses, 3 viral infection has little impact on mosquito health. This immunity is due in part to 4 mosquito RNA interference (RNAi) pathways that generate antiviral small interfering 5 RNAs (siRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). RNAi also maintains genome 6 integrity by potently repressing mosquito transposon activity in the germline and soma. 7 However, viral and transposon small RNA regulatory pathways have not been 8 systematically examined together in mosquitoes. Therefore, we developed an integrated 9 Mosquito Small RNA Genomics (MSRG) resource that analyzes the transposon and 10 virus small RNA profiles in mosquito cell cultures and somatic and gonadal tissues 11 across four medically important mosquito species. Our resource captures both somatic 12 and gonadal small RNA expression profiles within mosquito cell cultures, and we report 13 the evolutionary dynamics of a novel Mosquito-Conserved piRNA Cluster Locus 14 (MCpiRCL) composed of satellite DNA repeats. In the larger culicine mosquito genomes 15 we detected highly regular periodicity in piRNA biogenesis patterns coinciding with the 16 expansion of Piwi pathway genes. Finally, our resource enables detection of crosstalk 17 between piRNA and siRNA populations in mosquito cells during a response to virus 18 infection. The MSRG resource will aid efforts to dissect and combat the capacity of 19 mosquitoes to tolerate and spread arboviruses. 20 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.061598; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 INTRODUCTION 2 Mosquitoes are one of the most prevalent vectors of human pathogens, yet there 3 is a wide variation in ability of the subclades to vector different pathogens. For example, 4 all human malaria parasites are exclusively vectored by anopheline mosquitoes yet 5 these same mosquitoes transmit few viruses other than O’Nyong nyong virus (ONNV) 6 and Mayaro virus (Vanlandingham et al. 2006; Brustolin et al. 2018). On the contrary, 7 culicine mosquitoes frequently transmit a range of human viral pathogens, such as 8 dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus (ZIKV), Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and yellow fever 9 virus (YFV) in tropical climates where AeAlbo and AeAeg thrive; whereas eastern 10 equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) and West Nile Virus (WNV) are spread mainly in 11 Culex mosquitoes that inhabit more temperate climates (Conway et al. 2014; Olson and 12 Blair 2015; Londono-Renteria and Colpitts 2016; Halbach et al. 2017; Lambrechts and 13 Saleh 2019). 14 Since vector-pathogen interactions are complex and variable, no dominant theory 15 yet explains why anopheline mosquitoes are less prolific than culicine mosquitoes in 16 spreading arboviruses. Arbovirus infections in humans lead to devastating symptoms 17 including fever, nausea, bleeding, extreme pain, brain damage and death. However, 18 culicine mosquitoes showing highly active arbovirus replication are practically 19 unaffected (Goic and Saleh 2012; Blair and Olson 2014; Olson and Blair 2015; 20 Lambrechts and Saleh 2019) and therefore are highly competent transmitters of 21 arboviruses to human hosts. 22 The three main classes of animal small regulatory RNAs are microRNAs 23 (miRNAs) and endogenous small-interfering RNAs (endo-siRNAs), which range in size 24 between 18-23nt long and are typically bound by Argonaute proteins; and Piwi- 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.061598; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 interacting RNAs (piRNAs) that are bound by Piwi proteins and which range in size 2 between 24-32nt in length. Arguably, the most extensively characterized animal small 3 regulatory RNAs are from Drosophila melanogaster, whose compact genome has 4 decades of careful annotation and pioneering genetics tools. Many groups including 5 ours have characterized D. melanogaster (Dmel) small RNAs comprising 258 miRNA 6 genes (Kozomara et al. 2019), ~20 large intergenic piRNA cluster loci also referred to 7 as master control loci (Brennecke et al. 2007; Malone et al. 2009; Wen et al. 2014), 8 >1000 genic piRNA cluster loci (Robine et al. 2009; Wen et al. 2014; Chirn et al. 2015), 9 and >1000 endogenous loci generating either large fold-back transcripts or sense- 10 antisense pairing transcripts that can give rise to endogenous siRNAs (Czech et al. 11 2008; Ghildiyal et al. 2008; Kawamura et al. 2008; Mirkovic-Hosle and Forstemann 12 2014; Wen et al. 2014; Wen et al. 2015). Finally, arbovirus-specific siRNAs and piRNAs 13 are also detected in systemically infected Dmel cell cultures (Flynt et al. 2009; Wu et al. 14 2010; Vodovar et al. 2011; Goic et al. 2013; Wen et al. 2014; Palmer et al. 2018). 15 Culicidae mosquitoes are relatives of Drosophilid fruit flies as members of the 16 Dipteran insect clade (Figure 1A, (Wiegmann et al. 2011)), yet ~260 Million Years Ago 17 (MYA) of evolutionary distance between Drosophilids and Culicidae imparts 18 physiological and molecular differences in small RNA compositions. Within mosquito 19 phylogeny, the anopheline subclade represented by Anopheles gambiae (AnGam) 20 display a greater degree of chromosome synteny to Drosophilids than the culicine 21 subclade of mosquitoes such as Culex quinquefasciatus (CuQuin), Aedes aegypti 22 (AeAeg) and Aedes albopictus (AeAlbo) (Dudchenko et al. 2017). Indeed, AnGam’s 23 genome (~0.28GB) is as compact in size as Dmel’s genome (~0.18GB), whereas 24 culicine mosquito genomes are an order of magnitude greater in size due to massive 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.061598; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Ma, Srivastav, Gamez et al. Figure 1. A B Samples Sequencing Small RNA genomics pipeline 18-23nt Arboviruses Genic & Intergenic D. melanogaster piRNA Clusters Loci Mosquito cell miRNAs A. gambiae ~260 culture ? ? endo- ~218 C. quinquefasciatus ? siRNAs Transposon piRNA Phasing 3' 5' ~170 A. aegypti Ovary Testis consensus families 24-31nt ~70 MYA A. albopictus 5' 5' 5' 5' Carcass piRNAs Reduced redundancy lists C Anopheles gambiae Culex quinquefasciatus Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus (AnGam) (CuQuin) (AeAeg) (AeAlbo) Sua5b Hsu Aag2 C6/36 Mos55 CCL-125 C7/10 U4.4 AgamP4 assembly CpipJ2 assembly AaegL5 assembly AalbF2 assembly * 0.28 GB: Chr 2, 3, X, MT 0.58 GB: no Chromosomes 1.87 GB: Chr 1, 2, 3, X, MT 2.54 GB: no Chromosomes Few unassembled contigs only 3172 super-contigs 2306 unassembled contigs ~2197 scaffolds ~13.1K gene models ~19.8K gene models ~14.6K gene models ~31.0K * gene models Figure 1. Overview of the mosquito small RNA genomics resource. (A) Phylogenetic tree of Dipteran insects in this study, with evolutionary distance measured by Million Years Ago (MYA). Blue and red color denote the anopheline and culicine lineages. (B) Organization of this resource that compares mosquito cell cultures to tissue types via determining the small RNA types and their genomic profiles. (C) Overview of the four mosquito species genomes and eight cell culture lines subjected to the small RNA genomics analysis pipeline. The specific genome assembly names are noted with genome configuration statistics below. The asterisk by the AeAlbo AalbF2 assembly indicates the early stage assembly annotation has an redundant list of gene models. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.061598; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: ​Fundamental Infrastructure for The
    Supplementary Data: The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: fundamental infrastructure ​ for the life sciences The “Supporting Material” referred to within this Supplementary Data can be found in the Supporting.Material.CDR.infrastructure file, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2625247 (https://zenodo.org/record/2625247). ​ ​ Figure 1. Scale of the Core Data Resources Table S1. Data from which Figure 1 is derived: Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Data entries 765881651 997794559 1726529931 1853429002 2715599247 Monthly user/IP addresses 1700660 2109586 2413724 2502617 2867265 FTEs 270 292.65 295.65 289.7 311.2 Figure 1 includes data from the following Core Data Resources: ArrayExpress, BRENDA, CATH, ChEBI, ChEMBL, EGA, ENA, Ensembl, Ensembl Genomes, EuropePMC, HPA, IntAct /MINT , InterPro, PDBe, PRIDE, SILVA, STRING, UniProt ● Note that Ensembl’s compute infrastructure physically relocated in 2016, so “Users/IP address” data are not available for that year. In this case, the 2015 numbers were rolled forward to 2016. ● Note that STRING makes only minor releases in 2014 and 2016, in that the interactions are re-computed, but the number of “Data entries” remains unchanged. The major releases that change the number of “Data entries” happened in 2013 and 2015. So, for “Data entries” , the number for 2013 was rolled forward to 2014, and the number for 2015 was rolled forward to 2016. The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: fundamental infrastructure for the life sciences ​ 1 Figure 2: Usage of Core Data Resources in research The following steps were taken: 1. API calls were run on open access full text articles in Europe PMC to identify articles that ​ ​ mention Core Data Resource by name or include specific data record accession numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Beginner's Guide to Eukaryotic Genome Annotation
    REVIEWS STUDY DESIGNS A beginner’s guide to eukaryotic genome annotation Mark Yandell and Daniel Ence Abstract | The falling cost of genome sequencing is having a marked impact on the research community with respect to which genomes are sequenced and how and where they are annotated. Genome annotation projects have generally become small-scale affairs that are often carried out by an individual laboratory. Although annotating a eukaryotic genome assembly is now within the reach of non-experts, it remains a challenging task. Here we provide an overview of the genome annotation process and the available tools and describe some best-practice approaches. Genome annotation Sequencing costs have fallen so dramatically that a sin- with some basic UNIX skills, ‘do-it-yourself’ genome A term used to describe two gle laboratory can now afford to sequence large, even annotation projects are quite feasible using present- distinct processes. ‘Structural’ human-sized, genomes. Ironically, although sequencing day tools. Here we provide an overview of the eukary- genome annotation is the has become easy, in many ways, genome annotation has otic genome annotation process, describe the available process of identifying genes and their intron–exon become more challenging. Several factors are respon- toolsets and outline some best-practice approaches. structures. ‘Functional’ genome sible for this. First, the shorter read lengths of second- annotation is the process of generation sequencing platforms mean that current Assembly and annotation: an overview attaching meta-data such as genome assemblies rarely attain the contiguity of the Assembly. The first step towards the successful annota- gene ontology terms to classic shotgun assemblies of the Drosophila mela- tion of any genome is determining whether its assem- structural annotations.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the National Center for Cide Resistance Mechanisms
    Zhou et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:32 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2584-8 RESEARCH Open Access ASGDB: a specialised genomic resource for interpreting Anopheles sinensis insecticide resistance Dan Zhou, Yang Xu, Cheng Zhang, Meng-Xue Hu, Yun Huang, Yan Sun, Lei Ma, Bo Shen* and Chang-Liang Zhu Abstract Background: Anopheles sinensis is an important malaria vector in Southeast Asia. The widespread emergence of insecticide resistance in this mosquito species poses a serious threat to the efficacy of malaria control measures, particularly in China. Recently, the whole-genome sequencing and de novo assembly of An. sinensis (China strain) has been finished. A series of insecticide-resistant studies in An. sinensis have also been reported. There is a growing need to integrate these valuable data to provide a comprehensive database for further studies on insecticide-resistant management of An. sinensis. Results: A bioinformatics database named An. sinensis genome database (ASGDB) was built. In addition to being a searchable database of published An. sinensis genome sequences and annotation, ASGDB provides in-depth analytical platforms for further understanding of the genomic and genetic data, including visualization of genomic data, orthologous relationship analysis, GO analysis, pathway analysis, expression analysis and resistance-related gene analysis. Moreover, ASGDB provides a panoramic view of insecticide resistance studies in An. sinensis in China. In total, 551 insecticide-resistant phenotypic and genotypic reports on An. sinensis distributed in Chinese malaria- endemic areas since the mid-1980s have been collected, manually edited in the same format and integrated into OpenLayers map-based interface, which allows the international community to assess and exploit the high volume of scattered data much easier.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Scientific Report 2013 on the Cover Structure 3Fof in the Protein Data Bank, Determined by Laponogov, I
    EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute Annual Scientific Report 2013 On the cover Structure 3fof in the Protein Data Bank, determined by Laponogov, I. et al. (2009) Structural insight into the quinolone-DNA cleavage complex of type IIA topoisomerases. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 16, 667-669. © 2014 European Molecular Biology Laboratory This publication was produced by the External Relations team at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) A digital version of the brochure can be found at www.ebi.ac.uk/about/brochures For more information about EMBL-EBI please contact: [email protected] Contents Introduction & overview 3 Services 8 Genes, genomes and variation 8 Molecular atlas 12 Proteins and protein families 14 Molecular and cellular structures 18 Chemical biology 20 Molecular systems 22 Cross-domain tools and resources 24 Research 26 Support 32 ELIXIR 36 Facts and figures 38 Funding & resource allocation 38 Growth of core resources 40 Collaborations 42 Our staff in 2013 44 Scientific advisory committees 46 Major database collaborations 50 Publications 52 Organisation of EMBL-EBI leadership 61 2013 EMBL-EBI Annual Scientific Report 1 Foreword Welcome to EMBL-EBI’s 2013 Annual Scientific Report. Here we look back on our major achievements during the year, reflecting on the delivery of our world-class services, research, training, industry collaboration and European coordination of life-science data. The past year has been one full of exciting changes, both scientifically and organisationally. We unveiled a new website that helps users explore our resources more seamlessly, saw the publication of ground-breaking work in data storage and synthetic biology, joined the global alliance for global health, built important new relationships with our partners in industry and celebrated the launch of ELIXIR.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Transcriptomics supports local sensory regulation in the antennae of the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus Jose Manuel Latorre-Estivalis; Marcos Sterkel; Sheila Ons; and Marcelo Gustavo Lorenzo DATABASES Database S1 – Protein sequences of all target genes in fasta format. Database S2 – Edited Generic Feature Format (GFF) file of the R. prolixus genome used for read mapping and gene expression analysis. Database S3 - FPKM values of target genes in the three libraries. Database S4 – Fasta sequences from different insects used in the CT/DH – CRF/DH and nuclear receptor phylogenetic analyses. FIGURES Figure S1 - Molecular phylogenetic analyses of calcitonin diuretic (CT) and corticotropin-releasing factor- related (CRF) like diuretic hormone (DH) receptors of R. prolixus and other insects. The evolutionary history of R. prolixus CT/DH and CRF/DH receptors was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method in PhyML v3.0. The support values on the bipartitions correspond to SH-like P values, which were calculated by means of aLRT SH-like test. The CT/DH receptor 3 clade was highlighted in red. The CT/DH and CRF/DH R. prolixus receptors were displayed in blue. The LG substitution amino-acid model was used. Species abbreviations: Dmel, Drosophila melanogaster; Aaeg, Aedes aegytpi; Agam, Anopheles gambiae; Clec, Cimex lecturiaus; Hhal, Halomorpha halys; Rpro, Rhodnius prolixus; Amel, Apis mellifera, Acyrthosiphon pisum; and Tcas, Tribolium castaneum. The glutamate receptor sequence from the D. melanogaster (FlyBase Acc. N° GC11144) was used as an out-group. The sequences used from other insects are in Supplementary Database S4). Figure S2 – Molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear receptor genes of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Biocuration 2016 - Posters
    Biocuration 2016 - Posters Source: http://www.sib.swiss/events/biocuration2016/posters 1 RAM: A standards-based database for extracting and analyzing disease-specified concepts from the multitude of biomedical resources Jinmeng Jia and Tieliu Shi Each year, millions of people around world suffer from the consequence of the misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment of various disease, especially those intractable diseases and rare diseases. Integration of various data related to human diseases help us not only for identifying drug targets, connecting genetic variations of phenotypes and understanding molecular pathways relevant to novel treatment, but also for coupling clinical care and biomedical researches. To this end, we built the Rare disease Annotation & Medicine (RAM) standards-based database which can provide reference to map and extract disease-specified information from multitude of biomedical resources such as free text articles in MEDLINE and Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). RAM integrates disease-specified concepts from ICD-9, ICD-10, SNOMED-CT and MeSH (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html) extracted from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) based on the UMLS Concept Unique Identifiers for each Disease Term. We also integrated phenotypes from OMIM for each disease term, which link underlying mechanisms and clinical observation. Moreover, we used disease-manifestation (D-M) pairs from existing biomedical ontologies as prior knowledge to automatically recognize D-M-specific syntactic patterns from full text articles in MEDLINE. Considering that most of the record-based disease information in public databases are textual format, we extracted disease terms and their related biomedical descriptive phrases from Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) and Orphanet using UMLS Thesaurus.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Aedes Aegypti Mosquito Reference Genome Assembly Enables Biological Discovery and Vector Control
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/240747; this version posted December 29, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Improved Aedes aegypti mosquito reference genome assembly enables biological discovery and vector control Benjamin J. Matthews1-3*, Olga Dudchenko4-7*, Sarah Kingan8*, Sergey Koren9, Igor Antoshechkin10, Jacob E. Crawford11, William J. Glassford12, Margaret Herre1,3, Seth N. Redmond13,14, Noah H. Rose15, Gareth D. Weedall16,17, Yang Wu18,19, Sanjit S. Batra4-6, Carlos A. Brito-Sierra20,21, Steven D. Buckingham22, Corey L Campbell23, Saki Chan24, Eric Cox25, Benjamin R. Evans26, Thanyalak Fansiri27, Igor Filipović28, Albin Fontaine29-32, Andrea Gloria-Soria26, Richard Hall8, Vinita S. Joardar25, Andrew K. Jones33, Raissa G.G. Kay34, Vamsi K. Kodali25, Joyce Lee24, Gareth J. Lycett16, Sara N. Mitchell11, Jill Muehling8, Michael R. Murphy25, Arina D. Omer4-6, Frederick A. Partridge22, Paul Peluso8, Aviva Presser Aiden4,5,35,36, Vidya Ramasamy33, Gordana Rašić28, Sourav Roy37, Karla Saavedra-Rodriguez23, Shruti Sharan20,21, Atashi Sharma38, Melissa Laird Smith8, Joe Turner39, Allison M. Weakley11, Zhilei Zhao15, Omar S. Akbari40, William C. Black IV23, Han Cao24, Alistair C. Darby39, Catherine Hill20,21, J. Spencer Johnston41, Terence D. Murphy25, Alexander S. Raikhel37, David B. Sattelle22, Igor V. Sharakhov38,42, Bradley J. White11, Li Zhao43, Erez Lieberman Aiden4-7,13, Richard S. Mann12, Louis Lambrechts29,31, Jeffrey R. Powell26, Maria V. Sharakhova38,42, Zhijian Tu19, Hugh M.
    [Show full text]
  • A High-Quality De Novo Genome Assembly from a Single Mosquito Using Pacbio Sequencing
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article A High-Quality De novo Genome Assembly from a Single Mosquito Using PacBio Sequencing Sarah B. Kingan 1,† , Haynes Heaton 2,† , Juliana Cudini 2, Christine C. Lambert 1, Primo Baybayan 1, Brendan D. Galvin 1, Richard Durbin 3 , Jonas Korlach 1,* and Mara K. N. Lawniczak 2,* 1 Pacific Biosciences, 1305 O’Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA; [email protected] (S.B.K.); [email protected] (C.C.L.); [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (B.D.G.) 2 Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK; [email protected] (H.H.); [email protected] (J.C.) 3 Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (M.K.N.L.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 18 December 2018; Accepted: 15 January 2019; Published: 18 January 2019 Abstract: A high-quality reference genome is a fundamental resource for functional genetics, comparative genomics, and population genomics, and is increasingly important for conservation biology. PacBio Single Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing generates long reads with uniform coverage and high consensus accuracy, making it a powerful technology for de novo genome assembly. Improvements in throughput and concomitant reductions in cost have made PacBio an attractive core technology for many large genome initiatives, however, relatively high DNA input requirements (~5 µg for standard library protocol) have placed PacBio out of reach for many projects on small organisms that have lower DNA content, or on projects with limited input DNA for other reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Ortholog Losses in Insects and Vertebrates Stefan Wyder*†, Evgenia V Kriventseva‡†, Reinhard Schröder§, Tatsuhiko Kadowaki¶ and Evgeny M Zdobnov*†¥
    Open Access Research2007WyderetVolume al. 8, Issue 11, Article R242 Quantification of ortholog losses in insects and vertebrates Stefan Wyder*†, Evgenia V Kriventseva‡†, Reinhard Schröder§, Tatsuhiko Kadowaki¶ and Evgeny M Zdobnov*†¥ Addresses: *Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. †Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. ‡Department of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Geneva Medical School, rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. §Interf. Institut für Zellbiologie, Abt. Genetik der Tiere, Universität Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. ¶Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan. ¥Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Correspondence: Evgeny M Zdobnov. Email: [email protected] Published: 16 November 2007 Received: 30 June 2007 Revised: 4 October 2007 Genome Biology 2007, 8:R242 (doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r242) Accepted: 16 November 2007 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/11/R242 © 2007 Wyder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Ortholog<p>Comparisonof molecular
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Scientific Report 2011 Annual Scientific Report 2011 Designed and Produced by Pickeringhutchins Ltd
    European Bioinformatics Institute EMBL-EBI Annual Scientific Report 2011 Annual Scientific Report 2011 Designed and Produced by PickeringHutchins Ltd www.pickeringhutchins.com EMBL member states: Austria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom. Associate member state: Australia EMBL-EBI is a part of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) EMBL-EBI EMBL-EBI EMBL-EBI EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SD United Kingdom Tel. +44 (0)1223 494 444, Fax +44 (0)1223 494 468 www.ebi.ac.uk EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg Germany Tel. +49 (0)6221 3870, Fax +49 (0)6221 387 8306 www.embl.org [email protected] EMBL Grenoble 6, rue Jules Horowitz, BP181 38042 Grenoble, Cedex 9 France Tel. +33 (0)476 20 7269, Fax +33 (0)476 20 2199 EMBL Hamburg c/o DESY Notkestraße 85 22603 Hamburg Germany Tel. +49 (0)4089 902 110, Fax +49 (0)4089 902 149 EMBL Monterotondo Adriano Buzzati-Traverso Campus Via Ramarini, 32 00015 Monterotondo (Rome) Italy Tel. +39 (0)6900 91402, Fax +39 (0)6900 91406 © 2012 EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute All texts written by EBI-EMBL Group and Team Leaders. This publication was produced by the EBI’s Outreach and Training Programme. Contents Introduction Foreword 2 Major Achievements 2011 4 Services Rolf Apweiler and Ewan Birney: Protein and nucleotide data 10 Guy Cochrane: The European Nucleotide Archive 14 Paul Flicek:
    [Show full text]
  • Uniprot.Ws: R Interface to Uniprot Web Services
    Package ‘UniProt.ws’ September 26, 2021 Type Package Title R Interface to UniProt Web Services Version 2.33.0 Depends methods, utils, RSQLite, RCurl, BiocGenerics (>= 0.13.8) Imports AnnotationDbi, BiocFileCache, rappdirs Suggests RUnit, BiocStyle, knitr Description A collection of functions for retrieving, processing and repackaging the UniProt web services. Collate AllGenerics.R AllClasses.R getFunctions.R methods-select.R utilities.R License Artistic License 2.0 biocViews Annotation, Infrastructure, GO, KEGG, BioCarta VignetteBuilder knitr LazyLoad yes git_url https://git.bioconductor.org/packages/UniProt.ws git_branch master git_last_commit 5062003 git_last_commit_date 2021-05-19 Date/Publication 2021-09-26 Author Marc Carlson [aut], Csaba Ortutay [ctb], Bioconductor Package Maintainer [aut, cre] Maintainer Bioconductor Package Maintainer <[email protected]> R topics documented: UniProt.ws-objects . .2 UNIPROTKB . .4 utilities . .8 Index 11 1 2 UniProt.ws-objects UniProt.ws-objects UniProt.ws objects and their related methods and functions Description UniProt.ws is the base class for interacting with the Uniprot web services from Bioconductor. In much the same way as an AnnotationDb object allows acces to select for many other annotation packages, UniProt.ws is meant to allow usage of select methods and other supporting methods to enable the easy extraction of data from the Uniprot web services. select, columns and keys are used together to extract data via an UniProt.ws object. columns shows which kinds of data can be returned for the UniProt.ws object. keytypes allows the user to discover which keytypes can be passed in to select or keys via the keytype argument. keys returns keys for the database contained in the UniProt.ws object .
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodb V8: Update of the Hierarchical Catalog of Orthologs and the Underlying Free Software Evgenia V
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library D250–D256 Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, Vol. 43, Database issue Published online 26 November 2014 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1220 OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software Evgenia V. Kriventseva1,2,*, Fredrik Tegenfeldt1,2, Tom J. Petty1,2, Robert M. Waterhouse1,2, Felipe A. Simao˜ 1,2, Igor A. Pozdnyakov1,2, Panagiotis Ioannidis1,2 and Evgeny M. Zdobnov1,2,* 1Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland and 2Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland Received October 07, 2014; Revised November 06, 2014; Accepted November 07, 2014 ABSTRACT data from a large variety of species is growing quickly, and the gap between such sequence data and the experimental Orthology, refining the concept of homology, is the functional data is widening. The evolutionary relatedness of cornerstone of evolutionary comparative studies. genes, termed homology, can be asserted by sequence anal- With the ever-increasing availability of genomic data, ysis, providing the means to formulate working hypotheses inference of orthology has become instrumental for on gene functions from experimentation on model organ- generating hypotheses about gene functions crucial isms. In turn, homologs referencing a particular ancestor to many studies. This update of the OrthoDB hierar- have been termed orthologs (1–3). Such genes originating chical catalog of orthologs (http://www.orthodb.org) by speciation from an ancestral gene are most likely to re- covers 3027 complete genomes, including the most tain the ancestral function (4), making orthology the most comprehensive set of 87 arthropods, 61 vertebrates, precise way to link gene functional knowledge to a much 227 fungi and 2627 bacteria (sampling the most com- wider genomics space.
    [Show full text]