Disposal by Sale of Defence Surplus Equipment and Stores

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disposal by Sale of Defence Surplus Equipment and Stores NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REPORTBY THE COMPTROLLERAND AUDITOR GENERAL Disposal by Sale of Defence Surplus Equipmentand Stores ORDEREDBY THE HOUSEOFCOMMONS TO BE PRINTED 16 MARCH1993 LONDON: HMSO 557 f7.40 NET DISPOSALBY SALE OF DEFENCESURPLUS EQUPMENT AND STORES This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. John Bourn National Audit Office Comptroller and Auditor General 2.4 February 1993 The Comptroller and Auditor General is the head of the National Audit Office employing some 800 staff. He, and the NAO, are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a widerange of other public sector bodies: and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. DISPOSALBY SALE OF DEFENCESURPLUS EQUIPMENT AND STORES Contents Pages Summary and conclusions 1 Part 1: Background 4 Part 2: Organisation and administration of disposal by sale 8 Part 3: Disposal by sale of major capital equipment 13 Part 4: Disposal by sale of other surpluses 19 Part 5: The collection of disposal receipts 25 Appendices 1. The Gulf conflict 30 2. Sale of unusual disposal items 31 DISPOSALBY SALE OF DEFENCESURPLUS EQUIPMENT AND STORES Summary and conclusions 1 The Ministry of Defence (the Department) run the biggest centralised sales disposal operation in the United Kingdom. Their aim is to dispose of surplus equipment and stores as quickly as possible whilst maximising the return. As well as generating receipts, disposal releases storage space and reduces “holding” costs. 2 In the five years 1987-88 to 1991-92 inclusive the Department raised E264.4 million gross at current prices, E196.5 million net. Over the next few years the items available for sale will rise dramatically. Entire types of equipment are being phased out, for example, all Leander frigates and Oberon submarines and all Phantom and Buccaneer aircraft. Overall holdings of front line equipment will reduce by about 20 per cent. Stockholdings of a wide range of other material, in particular spare parts, will reduce by 33 to 50 per cent. 3 The National Audit Office examined the Department’s arrangements for selling surplus items and for collecting disposal receipts. Disposal of waste material, which is at a cost to the Department, was not part of the examination. The National Audit Office’s main findings and cbnclusions are set out below. On the sale of 4 The Directorate of Sales (Disposals) are responsible for the sale of surpluses. surpluses They were formed in April 1990 to centralise disposal by sale and are part of the Defence Export Services Organisation. In August 1991 the Directorate took over responsibility for the disposal by sale operation of the British Forces in Germany where the most significant force reductions are occurring. The sales depot there is performing an important role in the drawdown. The National Audit Office concluded that the Department have made good progress in establishing a unified organisation for disposal by sale: they have set objectives and improved their procedures for handling an increasing level of business (paragraphs 1.6 and 2.2 to 2.12). 5 The Directorate are pursuing a number of major initiatives with United Kingdom industry aimed at tackling the extraordinary volume of major capital equipments and spares which will be declared surplus over the next 4-5 years. These may take the form of either buy back arrangements with the original supplier or storage, refurbishment, and marketing of the equipment with a view to profit-sharing arrangements. A profit-sharing arrangement has been reached with one contractor for the storage and marketing of naval spares, and similar arrangements are intended for Royal Air Force and Army spares (paragraphs 3.20 to 3.26 and 3.28). 6 The Directorate operate under a number of external constraints. In selling major capital equipments overseas they must ensure sales objectives are compatible with security interests and export licences are obtained. In selling miscellaneous material in the United Kingdom they must have regard to environmental factors and have proper safeguards as laid down in DlSPOSAL BY SALE OF DEFENCESURPLUS EQUIPMENT AND STORES the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Moreover, the Directorate are confronted with increased competition from overseas-the United Kingdom’s competitors in the second-hand Defence markets at home and abroad now include our allies and the former Warsaw Pact countries (paragraphs 3.6, 3.20, 3.21, 4.23 and 4.24). 7 The Department recognise that in view of the expanded scope for sales over the coming years they will need to: . have a clearer idea of the relationship between prices achieved and the costs incurred for individual categories or ranges of item to determine whether there is a net benefit or cost. For items such as major capital equipment, the net benefit will be obvious but for some other items it may be more economic to dispose of them as waste. However, total disposal receipts exceeded costs by a margin of 74 per cent over the five years 1987-88 to 1991-92 inclusive (paragraphs 1.6, 1.7, 2.16 and 2.17); . have better information on items becoming available for sale; on how long it takes to clear items declared for sale: and on the size of backlogs of unsold items. To cope with the increased supply, the Department are considering ways of speeding up disposal by sale for high volume/low value items (paragraphs 2.11, 2.18, 3.8, 3.11, 3.13, 3.15, 3.18, 3.19, 4.2, 4.6, 4.7 and 4.19 to 4.22); . continue their efforts to resolve the problems affecting the Directorate’s computer system and consider whether enhancements are necessary in the light of current information needs (paragraphs 2.14, 2.15 and 2.17 to 2.21): . consider whether any or all aspects of disposal work are suitable for contractorisation. There is already extensive private sector involvement in areas such as auctions and for recovery, recycling and reclamation work and marketing of spares (paragraphs 2.4, 2.5, 2.23 and 3.23 to 3.26): . where possible, sell major capital equipment such as ships and aircraft as complete operational items-their value has often been reduced by the removal of equipment for spares; and sell the operational primary equipment along with any available spares-currently, spares are often put on the market later, detracting from the overall price realised. Any financial and operational gains from the retention of spares needs to be weighedagainst sales potential (paragraphs 3.9 to 3.11, and3.13 to 3.17); . extend the database of the Defence Export Services Organisation to encompass the second hand market for major capital equipment, and make greater use of their expertise and that of Service Attaches on British Missions abroad (paragraphs 3.20, 3.21 and 3.27 to 3.31); and . extend their assessments of the relative merits of sale by competitive tender or sale by public auction for different types of high volume/low value items, for example, by trialling both approaches for a selection of “test” items (paragraphs 4.8 and 4.9). On collection of 8 To help ensure that payments for disposals are full and prompt the disposal receipts Department work to the sound general rule that goods are not collected before payment is received. Nonetheless, they could continue to strengthen their control procedures, for example, to: 2 DISPOSALBY SALE OF DEFENCESURPLUS EQUIPMENT AND STORES . safeguard against theft and fraud by ensuring full, independent and properly documented checks on issues of items for disposal, and on sales receipts. The need for adequate safeguards is highlighted by a major investigation by the Department’s police who are visiting several disposal depots and units (paragraph 5.4 to 5.15); . ensure receipts are paid in without undue delay. For example, in a random sample of auction receipts for 1990 and 1991 the National Audit Office found that about 25 per cent of auction proceeds were paid in late. By January 1992 the Department introduced new contracts for auctioneers to remedy the position (paragraphs 5.16-5.19). Overall conclusions 9 Reductions in the front line and associated reductions in the support area will give rise to exceptional disposal activity in the next few years on a scale unprecedented since the period following the Second World War. It is important, therefore, that the Department continue to make progress in developing a strong organisation for disposal by sale whilst pursuing joint venture schemes with industry. The main challenge facing the Department will be to cope with the volume and range of items becoming available for disposal whilst maximising the return. This will be in the face of greater competition in the United Kingdom and overseas markets following the improved international climate among the major power countries. 3 DISPOSALBY SALE OF DEFENCESURPLUS EQUIPMENT AND STORES Part 1: Background 1.1 The Ministry of Defence (the Department) “holding” costs. If surpluses cannot be sold run the biggest centralised disposal by sale the Department have to pay for disposal as operation in the United Kingdom. Items sold waste. range through clothing, household furniture, office and laboratory equipment, scrap and precious metals, vehicles, aircraft and ships. Responsibilities The Department’s customers include individuals. large and small companies, and 1.4 Responsibility for identifying and declaring defence forces from other countries. surplus equipment and stores rests with equipment and supply managers, at all levels, 1.2 Reductions in the front-line and associated throughout the Department.
Recommended publications
  • Queens' College Record 2009
    QUEENS’ COLLEGE RECORD • 2009 Queens’ College Record 2009 The Queens’ College Record 2009 Table of Contents 2 The Fellowship (March 2009) The Sporting Record 38 Captains of the Clubs 4 From the President 38 Reports from the Sports Clubs The Society The Student Record 5 The Fellows in 2008 44 The Students 2008 9 Retirement of Professor John Tiley 44 Admissions 9 Book Review 45 Director of Music 10 Thomae Smithi Academia 45 Dancer in Residence 10 Douglas Parmée, Fellow 1947–2008 46 Around the World and Back: A Hawk-Eye View 11 The Very Revd Professor Henry Chadwick 47 On the Hunt for the Cave of Euripides Fellow 1946–59, Honorary Fellow 1959–2008 48 Five Weeks in Japan 13 Richard Hickox, Honorary Fellow 1996–2008 49 Does Anyone Know the Way to Mongolia? 50 South Korea – As Diverse as its Kimchi 14 The Staff 51 Losing the Granola 52 Streetbite 2008 The Buildings 52 Distinctions and Awards 15 The Fabric 2008 54 Reports from the Clubs and Societies 16 The Chapel The Academic Record 62 Learning to Find Our Way Through Economic Turmoil 18 The Libraries 64 War in Academia 19 Newly-Identified Miniatures from the Old Library The Development Record 23 The Gardens 66 Donors to Queens’ 2008 The Historical Record The Alumni Record 24 1209 And All That 69 Alumni Association AGM 26 A Bohemian Mystery 69 News of Members 29 Robert Plumptre – 18th-Century President of Queens’ 80 The 2002 Matriculation Year and Servant of the House of Yorke 81 Deaths 33 Abraham v Abraham 82 Obituaries 37 Head of the River 1968 88 Forthcoming Alumni Events The front cover photograph shows the Martyrdom of St Lucy from a miniature attributed to Pacino di Bonaguida, from the Old Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Jsp 800 Defence Movements and Transportation Regulations
    JSP 800 DEFENCE MOVEMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS VOLUME 2 PASSENGER TRAVEL INSTRUCTIONS Third Edition By Command of the Defence Council MINISTRY OF DEFENCE January 2010 FOREWORD This document outlines the Joint Service Policy for movement of passengers and provides guidance to formations and units. This volume of JSP 800 is a ‘live’ publication and will be subject to amendment in order to keep it relevant. The travel instructions in this manual replace those formally published in the following areas: a. The previous edition of JSP 800 which should now be destroyed. b. Instructions previously covered in Defence Council Instructions (DCIs) and those DINs which expire on issue of this edition. Personal contact details of junior staff redacted under section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act The Sponsor of JSP 800 Volume 2 is the Deputy Head, SCM. Each Chapter of this volume has a Chapter Sponsor, identified in the contents list, and who is responsible for the maintenance of and update of the content via the process undertaken by the Defence Passenger Policy Committee and associated Working Groups . Chapter Sponsors should review their chapters, to ensure accuracy and relevance, and pass proposed amendments to the Technical Author who will aim to publish amendments to the intranet as a minimum on an annual basis. This volume will contain some reference to DCIs and DINs. It must be noted that these were the latest edition at the time of printing and may have been superseded. Some duplication necessarily exists between these instructions and those contained in other volumes of JSP 800 although this has been minimised.
    [Show full text]
  • NFLA Publishes Report Raising Concerns Over the Radium Legacy at Dalgety Bay; and Asks How Many More MOD Sites Could Be Affected?
    NFLA Media release - for immediate release, 14th October 2013 NFLA publishes report raising concerns over the radium legacy at Dalgety Bay; and asks how many more MOD sites could be affected? The Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) publishes today a new study considering the issues around radioactive contamination at Dalgety Bay in Fife and highlights a large number of other existing and former Ministry of Defence sites which could contain similar levels of contamination. (1) Over the past couple of years, the local Fife Council, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), the independent Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) and the Ministry of Defence (MOD) have been dealing with the complexities of radium contamination on the beach around Dalgety Bay in east Fife. Large radioactive particles have been found on the beach and around the Dalgety Bay shoreline. Their origin is likely to have come from radium tipped dials from dismantled Second World War aeroplanes, which were disposed of after the former airfield was decommissioned. As the NFLA briefing notes, SEPA have determined that the MOD should be responsible for the clean-up of the site, but the MOD is disputing these findings. It is possible that the area could also be formally designated as „radioactively contaminated land‟. The COMARE group of health experts have also raised serious public health concerns with the radioactive contamination. The local MP, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, has been highly critical of the MOD‟s challenge to SEPA‟s findings and urged a swift clean-up of the area. The NFLA report provides a full overview of this alarming matter, but it also further considers a long list of other existing or former MOD owned sites across Scotland, England and Wales which may also contain similar levels of radium contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence: Competition in the Provision of Sufport Services
    NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REPORTBY THE COMPTROLLERAND AUQITORGENERAL Ministryof Defence:Competition in the Provisionof SupportServices ORDERED BY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS TO BE PRINTED 10 JULY 1992 LONDON: HMSO 133 f7.25 NET MINISTRY OF DEFEhKEz COMPETITION IN THE PROVISION OF SUPPORT SERVICES This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act, 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. John Bourn National Audit Office Comptroller and Auditor General 22 June 1992 The Comptroller and Auditor General is the head of the National Audit Office employing some 900 staff. He, and the NAO, are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies; and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies haveused their resources. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE: COMPETITION IN THE PROVISION OF SUFPORT SERVICES Contents Pages Summary and conclusions 1 Part 1: Introduction 8 Part 2: Progress in applying competition to the provision of support services 11 Part 3: Maximising the benefits of competition 19 Part 4: Monitoring the performance of contractors 23 Appendices I. Examples of services provided wholly OI in part by contractors 27 2. Locations visited by the National Audit Office at which activities had been market tested 29 3. Market testing proposals: 1991-92 to 1993-94 30 4. Progress in mandatory areas 32 5. Use of the private sector in the provision of training 34 MNISTRY OF DEFENCE: COMPETITION IN THE PROVISION OF SUPPORT SERVICES Summary and conclusions 1 Government policy is that, where possible, work carried out by departments should be market tested-that is, subjected to competition and a contract let if it makes management sense and will improve value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Visits to Schools
    Location Location Name Description Date Location Address/Venue Town/City Postcode NE1 - AFCO Newcas Ferryhill Business and tle Ferryhill Business and Enterprise College Science of our lives. Organised by DEBP 14/07/2016 (RAF) Enterprise College Durham NE1 - AFCO Newcas Dene Community tle School Presentations to Year 10 26/04/2016 (RAF) Dene Community School Peterlee NE1 - AFCO Newcas tle St Benet Biscop School ‘Futures Evening’ aimed at Year 11 and Sixth Form 04/07/2016 (RAF) St Benet Biscop School Bedlington LS1 - Area Hemsworth Arts and Office Community Academy Careers Fair 30/06/2016 Leeds Hemsworth Academy Pontefract LS1 - Area Office Gateways School Activity Day - PDT 17/06/2016 Leeds Gateways School Leeds LS1 - Area Grammar School at Office The Grammar School at Leeds PDT with CCF 09/05/2016 Leeds Leeds Leeds LS1 - Area Queen Ethelburgas Office College Careers Fair 18/04/2016 Leeds Queen Ethelburgas College York NE1 - AFCO Newcas City of Sunderland tle Sunderland College Bede College Careers Fair 20/04/2016 (RAF) Campus Sunderland LS1 - Area Office King James's School PDT 17/06/2016 Leeds King James's School Knareborough LS1 - Area Wickersley School And Office Sports College Careers Fair 27/04/2016 Leeds Wickersley School Rotherham LS1 - Area Office York High School Speed dating events for Year 10 organised by NYBEP 21/07/2016 Leeds York High School York LS1 - Area Caedmon College Office Whitby 4 x Presentation and possible PDT 22/04/2016 Leeds Caedmon College Whitby Whitby LS1 - Area Ermysted's Grammar Office School 2 x Operation
    [Show full text]
  • And Then… (Accounts of Life After Halton 1963-2013)
    And Then… (Accounts of Life after Halton 1963-2013) Compiled & Edited by Gerry (Johnny) Law And Then… CONTENTS Foreword & Dedication 3 Introduction 3 List of aircraft types 6 Whitehall Cenotaph 249 St George’s 50th Anniversary 249 RAF Halton Apprentices Hymn 251 Low Flying 244 Contributions: John Baldwin 7 Tony Benstead 29 Peter Brown 43 Graham Castle 45 John Crawford 50 Jim Duff 55 Roger Garford 56 Dennis Greenwell 62 Daymon Grewcock 66 Chris Harvey 68 Rob Honnor 76 Merv Kelly 89 Glenn Knight 92 Gerry Law 97 Charlie Lee 123 Chris Lee 126 John Longstaff 143 Alistair Mackie 154 Ivor Maggs 157 David Mawdsley 161 Tony Meston 164 Tony Metcalfe 173 Stuart Meyers 175 Ian Nelson 178 Bruce Owens 193 Geoff Rann 195 Tony Robson 197 Bill Sandiford 202 Gordon Sherratt 206 Mike Snuggs 211 Brian Spence 213 Malcolm Swaisland 215 Colin Woodland 236 John Baldwin’s Ode 246 In Memoriam 252 © the Contributors 2 And Then… FOREWORD & DEDICATION This book is produced as part of the 96th Entry’s celebration of 50 years since Graduation Our motto is “Quam Celerrime (With Greatest Speed)” and our logo is that very epitome of speed, the Cheetah, hence the ‘Spotty Moggy’ on the front page. The book is dedicated to all those who joined the 96th Entry in 1960 and who subsequently went on to serve the Country in many different ways. INTRODUCTION On the 31st July 1963 the 96th Entry marched off Henderson Parade Ground marking the conclusion of 3 years hard graft, interspersed with a few laughs. It also marked the start of our Entry into the big, bold world that was the Royal Air Force at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • DC and R Report
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATION COMMITTEE 5 October 2016 A report by the Corporate Director – Economy and Highways _____________________________________________________________________ Application No: 1/16/9005 District: Carlisle Applicant: Fortum Carlisle Limited and Parish: Kingmoor Kingmoor Park Properties Ltd The Marketing Suite Received: 10 June 2016 Regents Court Kingmoor Business Park Carlisle Carlisle PROPOSAL: Erection of an energy from waste plant including reception and fuel processing hall, boiler house and air cooled condensing building and associated operations including 70 m high flue stack, 2 no silos for storage of fuel, 4 no silos for the storage of ash, car parking and new access roads, gatehouse, utilities building, weighbridge, and balancing pond. LOCATION: Kingmoor Park Industrial Estate, Land to North of Kings Drive, Carlisle, Cumbria, CA6 4SE _____________________________________________________________________ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That having first taken into consideration the environmental information as defined in the Town & Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 submitted in connection with the application, planning permission be GRANTED subject to the conditions set out in Appendix 1 to this report. 2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 The proposal is for the construction of an Energy Recovered Fuel (ERF) facility which would receive up to 195,000 tonnes of refuse derived fuel (RDF) annually; it would generate 22MW of electricity, enough to power the equivalent of up to 45,000 homes. The
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Remembrance for Those Who Died in the Solway Within the Area of Annan
    BOOK OF REMEMBRANCE FOR THOSE WHO DIED IN THE SOLWAY WITHIN THE AREA OF ANNAN compiled by Clive Bonner edited for website by Robert Mitchell 2019 Profits from the sale of this book to Annan United Reformed Church and Annandale Churches Together for their work in the community of Annan. © Clive Bonner 2009 ISBN 9781 899316540 1 Explanation This work of Remembrance has grown from a suggestion, made by a person who lost his own father to the Solway, that the Annan fishermen who died while fishing in the Solway should have a memorial in Annan. He felt it fitting that the memorial should be in that building he knew as the 'fisherman's church', that is the Annan United Reformed Church, which was from the 1890's to 2000 the Congregational Church. With the backing of the congregation of the Annan United Reformed Church and the members of Annandale Churches Together I undertook to do the research required to bring the memorial into being. A small group of people drawn from all the interested denominations within Annan was formed and at its only meeting was tasked with providing the names of fishermen who fitted the criterion to be included on the memorial. The criterion was to limit the memorial to those who sailed from Annan or were resident in Annan at the time of their loss. Using this information, I researched in the local and national newspapers to find the reports telling the known facts, obtained from people present at the time of the tragedies. I have transcribed the reports from either the original newspapers or microfiche and have only added detail to correct factual inaccuracies using information from death certificates and family when supplied.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiocommunication
    Radio Communication October 1989 ELECTRONIC COUNTER MEASURES: How a moth, a 40 year-old aircraft and the RAF join forces to cause confusion IMF ----- LEICESTER SHOW PREVIEW KEN WOOD TS-950S. This is DX-clusive Rumours have abounded for some months that from your operating frequency — even during Kenwood were once again about to take the HF transmitting; such as the revolutionary digital signal transceiver market by the throat, and with the processing option which gives improvements of up to announcement of the TS-950S those predictions have 10 dB in carrier and unwanted sideband suppression; proved to be true. It is an undisputed fact that variable transmit bandwidth; adjustable rise time of Kenwood HF transceivers have always led the way, the CW envelope; and much more. and it seemed almost impossible for their design team The photograph and this brief text can only give a hint to make significant advances on the success of the TS- of what the TS-950S can deliver — the full story can 940S, — but they have. only be told by a visit to your Kenwood approved We don't have to tell you that the receiver performance dealer or a browse through some detailed literature, is outstanding; a noise floor of -140 dBm will do that. but take it from me that once again, Kenwood have Nor do we have to mention the ease of use; Kenwood shown the way forward in HF transceiver design. has an enviable reputation in this area. What we must give a few hints about are some of the new operating John Wilson G3PCY/5N2AAC aids which Kenwood have included, such as a dual receiver which allows you to listen up to 500 kHz away LOWE ELECTRONICS LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Care for the Armed Forces
    House of Commons Defence Committee Medical care for the Armed Forces Seventh Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 5 February 2008 HC 327 [Incorporating HC 655-i, ii & iii, Session 2006-07] Published on 18 February 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chairman) Mr David S Borrow MP (Labour, South Ribble) Mr David Crausby MP (Labour, Bolton North East) Linda Gilroy MP (Labour, Plymouth Sutton) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Mr Mike Hancock MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, North Essex) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Robert Key MP (Conservative, Salisbury) John Smith MP (Labour, Vale of Glamorgan) Richard Younger-Ross MP (Liberal Democrat, Teignbridge) The following Members were also Members of the Committee during the Parliament. Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley and Sidcup) Mr Mark Lancaster MP (Conservative, North East Milton Keynes) Willie Rennie MP (Liberal Democrat, Dunfermline and West Fife) Mr Desmond Swayne MP (Conservative, New Forest West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Justice System Policing Review (Part 1)
    Service Justice System Policing Review (Part 1) Does the current structure and skill set of the Service Police organisations, and the MDP, match the future requirements of the Service Justice System? Professor Sir Jon Murphy QPM DL LLB Liverpool John Moores University (Centre for Advanced Policing Studies) Contents Recommendations Terms of Reference Introduction Methodology Context The Service Policing Function Responses to TOR Questions Appendices Appendix A: Table of Recommendations Appendix B: Summaries of Service Police responsibilities The Royal Military Police The Royal Navy Police The RAF Police The Ministry of Defence Police Appendix C: General Policing Duties Appendix D: Investigation & Specialist capabilities Appendix E: Victim and Witness care Appendix F: Case building and file preparation Appendix G: Gaps in RAFP jurisdiction Appendix H: Process Audit of Domestic Abuse and Serious Sexual Offences Investigated by the Service Police Review of Service Policing 2 Recommendations Recommendation 1. The three Service Police (SP) retain their individual identity and responsibility for General Policing Duties (GPD) and their ancillary non-police functions in support of operational effectiveness. Recommendation 2. A Tri-Service Defence Serious Crime Unit (DSCU) is created following the civilian police Regional Organised Crime Unit (ROCU) model. Recommendation 3. The three existing Special Investigations Bureau (SIB) be brigaded into the DSCU together with all current specialist investigative support m intelligence, undercover, surveillance, digital units, forensic and scenes of crime. Recommendation 4. SP personnel are seconded into the unit and should retain their individual SP identity. Recommendation 5. The DSCU to provide a multi-UZdTZa]Z_Rcj pW]jZ_Xq cVdaonse to the investigation of serious crime worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding the Military Procedures for Safeguarding
    Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: ArmySec/W/W/FOI2020/10418 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 22 September 2020 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Dear XXXXXXXXXXX, Thank you for your email of 8 September requesting the following information: the Military Procedures for Safeguarding I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence, and I can confirm that information in scope of your request is held. A copy of Joint Service Publication 834 Safeguarding Service Children and Young People can be found attached below. If you have any queries regarding the content of this letter, please contact this office in the first instance. If you wish to complain about the handling of your request, or the content of this response, you can request an independent internal review by contacting the Information Rights Compliance team, Ground Floor, MOD Main Building, Whitehall, SW1A 2HB (e-mail CIO-FOI- [email protected]). Please note that any request for an internal review should be made within 40 working days of the date of this response. If you remain dissatisfied following an internal review, you may raise your complaint directly to the Information Commissioner under the provisions of Section 50 of the Freedom of Information Act. Please note that the Information Commissioner will not normally investigate your case until the MOD internal review process has been completed.
    [Show full text]