Documentary Photography from the German Democratic Republic As a Substitute Public

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Documentary Photography from the German Democratic Republic As a Substitute Public humanities Article Documentary Photography from the German Democratic Republic as a Substitute Public Anne Pfautsch Kingston School of Art, Kingston University, London KT1 2QJ, UK; [email protected] Received: 25 April 2018; Accepted: 3 September 2018; Published: 10 September 2018 Abstract: This paper discusses artistic documentary photography from the German Democratic Republic (GDR) from the mid-1970s until the fall of the Berlin Wall, and suggests that it functioned as a substitute public–Ersatzöffentlichkeit–in society. This concept of a substitute public sphere sometimes termed a counter-public sphere, relates to GDR literature that, in retrospect, has been allocated this role. On the whole, in critical discourse certain texts have been recognised as being distinct from GDR propaganda which sought to deliver alternative readings in their coded texts. I propose that photography, despite having had a different status to literature in the GDR, adopted similar traits and also functioned as part of a substitute public sphere. These photographers aimed to expose the existing gap between the propagandised and actual life under socialism. They embedded a moral and critical position in their photographs to comment on society and to incite debate. However, it was necessary for these debates to occur in the private sphere, so that artists and their audience would avoid state persecution. In this paper, I review Harald Hauswald’s series Everyday Life (1976–1990) to demonstrate how photographs enabled substitute discourses in visual ways. Hauswald is a representative of artistic documentary photography and although he was never published in the official GDR media, he was the first East German photographer to publish in renowned West German and European media outlets, such as GEO magazine and ZEITmagazin, before the reunification. In 1990, he founded the ‘Ostkreuz–Agency of Photographers’ with six other East German documentary photographers. Keywords: documentary photography; German Democratic Republic; GDR daily life; photography as a substitute public; ‘Ostkreuz–Agentur der Fotografen’; literature as a substitute public; Harald Hauswald 1. Introduction In the German Democratic Republic (GDR) photography was a contested medium struggling between art and politics and was primarily used either to serve ideology or to object it. Associated with humanism, because of photography’s ‘objective’ character, by both party officials and the people, documentary style photography played a crucial role in this ambivalence (James 2013, p.104; Hoffmann and Knapp 1987). The Socialist Unity Party (SED), made use of photography’s claim to veracity and manipulated images to present a world in which socialism had already been achieved. Walter Ulbricht, the SED’s first secretary who stayed in power until 1971, sought to use the medium as a conveyor of “harmony, passion, and the appreciation for socialist life” (Betts 2010, p.197), if need be, by means of image manipulation. Berthold Beiler, the GDR’s most significant photography theorist, stated that by “interfering with a gentle hand” one could “turn possibility into reality”.1 Influenced by a Soviet photographic culture, the official photographs in the GDR aimed to fulfil the stipulations of socialist realism (James 2013, p. 104). The medium was used as an educational instrument and as a 1 Quoted from Karl Gernot Kuehn (Kuehn 1997, p. 50). Humanities 2018, 7, 88; doi:10.3390/h7030088 www.mdpi.com/journal/humanities Humanities 20182018,, 77,, 88x FOR PEER REVIEW 22 ofof 1717 instrument and as a design tool to illustrate texts for which this realistic form was pivotal cf. Heft 9, design1950; Heft tool 7, to 1954; illustrate Heft texts 8/9, 1960 for which (Zentrale this realisticKommission form wasFotografie pivotal der cf. HeftDDR 9, 1947–1991; 1950; Heft 7,Beiler 1954; 1977). Heft 8/9,According 1960 ( Zentraleto socialist Kommission realism, photographs Fotografie der had DDR to 1947–1991be positive,; Beiler future-oriented, 1977). According taken to from socialist the realism,workers’ photographs perspective, had and to had be positive, to present future-oriented, people as a collective taken from (cf. the Rehberg workers’ et perspective, al. 2012, p. and 43) had(cf. toFigures present 1 and people 2). as a collective (cf. Rehberg et al. 2012, p. 43) (cf. Figures1 and2). This approach approach was was challenged by some artisticartistic documentarydocumentary photographers,photographers, who committedcommitted themselves toto document document their their social social environment environment and createand create an alternative an alternative image ofimage life under of life socialism under insocialism the GDR. in the They GDR. revealed They andrevealed commented and comme on thented gap on betweenthe gap between the propagandised the propagandised and existing and socialismexisting socialism in East Germany. in East Germany. This is the This reason is the researchers reason researchers recognise recognise the documentary the documentary style as the style most as 2 prominentthe most prominent strand of strand artistic of photography artistic photography (cf. Hartewig (cf. Hartewig and Lüdtke and 2004 Lüdtke). 2004).2 FigureFigure 1. Carla 1. Carla Arnold, Arnold, Dem Dem Unkraut Unkraut zu Leibe zu Leibe (Bearing (Bearing down down the weeds),the weeds), 1960. 1960. Photo Photo Credits: Credits: Carla Carla Arnold. Arnold. At the beginning of the 1990s, scholars introduced the concept of Ersatzöffentlichkeit, a substitute public,At tothe describe beginning art of that the did 1990s, not sc followholars the introduced ideological the stipulationsconcept of Ersatzöffentlichkeit of the Socialist Unity, a substitute Party.3 Thepublic, term to describe has been art widely that did discussed not follow in the relation ideological to GDR stipulations literature, of wherethe Socialist writers Unity either Party. did3 The not implementterm has been socialist widely realist discussed principles in relation or encoded to GDR their literature, works where in such writers a way either that literature did not implement facilitated discoursessocialist realist on social principles issues, or which encoded were their officially works untenable in such ina way the East thatGerman literature political facilitated public discourses sphere.4 Theon social SED Partyissues, rule which made were it impossible officially untenable to discuss in socially the East relevant German and political delicate public topics sphere. in public.4 The AsSED a result,Party rule an openmade dialogue it impossible shifted to discuss into the socially private relevant sphere, whereand delicate the “real topics living in public. experiences” As a result, of East an Germansopen dialogue were discussed.shifted into5 Socialthe private debates sphere, were wh initiatedere the through “real living authors experiences” “writing between of East theGermans lines” andwere readers discussed. “reading5 Social between debates the were lines”, initiated which through made the authors formation “writing of a substitutebetween the public lines” sphere and dependentreaders “reading on aninterrelation between the of lines”, artists andwhich audiences. made the Brigitte formation Reimann’s of a unfinishedsubstitute novelpublicFranziska sphere Linkerhanddependent( onFranziska an interrelation Linkerhand of) (1974)artists (andReimann audiences. 1998), Brigitte and Ulrich Reimann’s Plenzdorf’s unfinished novel Die novel neuen Franziska Leiden desLinkerhand jungen W. (Franziska(The New Linkerhand Sorrows) of(1974) Young (Reimann W.) (1973) 1998), (Plenzdorf and Ulrich and Plenzdorf’s Fursland 2015 novel) are Die two neuen examples Leiden 2 Wulf Herzogenrath for example stresses a pre-eminence of social documentary photography as it stands in 2 Wulf Herzogenrath for example stresses a pre-eminence of social documentary photography as it stands in solidarity with thesolidarity people. with (Herzogenrath the people. 1992 (Herzogenrat, p. 30) Cf. (Domröseh 1992, 2012 p. 30), p. 21).Cf. (Domröse 2012, p. 21). 3 Cf.Cf. (Emmerich (Emmerich 1994; 1994; Leeder 2015 2015;; Herminghouse Herminghouse 1994 1994;; Domröse Domröse and Galerieet al. 1992; 1992 ;Berg Berg 2007;2007; MoosMoos 2004 2004;; Mittman Mittman 1994 ; 1994;Hohendahl Hohendahl and and Herminghouse Herminghouse 1983; Bessel 1983; andBessel Jessen and 1996 Jessen). 1996). 4 Cf. (Liebscher 2011, p. 146; Wallenburg and Cottbus 1990, p. 15; Müller 2006, p. 12; Reifarth 2003, p. 26). 4 Cf. (Liebscher 2011, p. 146; Wallenburg 1990, p. 15; Müller 2006, p. 12; Reifarth 2003, p. 26). 5 Juliana Raupp, ‘Kunstöffentlichkeit in der DDR als Gegenöffentlichkeit’, in (Rittersporn et al. 2003, p. 235). Cf. (Raupp 2001). 5 Juliana Raupp, ‘Kunstöffentlichkeit in der DDR als Gegenöffentlichkeit’, in (Rittersporn et al. 2003, p. 235). Cf. (Raupp 2001). Humanities 2018, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 17 Humanities 2018, 7, 88 3 of 17 des jungen W. (The New Sorrows of Young W.) (1973) (Plenzdorf 2015) are two examples of how texts criticised social conditions in the GDR. Both authors write from the perspective of the East German ofyouth: how Reimann’s texts criticised protagonist, social conditions Franziska in Linkerhand, the GDR. Both is a authors young writearchitect from whose the perspective ideals of urban of the Eastplanning German are clashing youth: Reimann’s with the actual protagonist, requirements Franziska of socialist Linkerhand, housing, is a youngand Plenzdorf’s architect whose protagonist, ideals ofEdgar, urban is breaking
Recommended publications
  • Ursula Arnold Zum 80
    Pressemitteilung Ursula Arnold zum 80. Geburtstag Photographien Ausstellungsdauer: 14. März bis 18. April 2009 Eröffnung: Sonnabend, 14. März, 17 Uhr, in Anwesenheit der Künstlerin Öffnungszeiten: Di – Sa 15 – 18 Uhr und nach Vereinbarung Galerie der Kunststiftung Poll Tel.: (030) 2849620 Gipsstraße 3 [email protected] 10119 Berlin www.poll-berlin.de Zum 80. Geburtstag der Photographin zeigt die Galerie der Kunststiftung Poll Arbeiten von Ursula Arnold, die neben Evelyn Richter und Arno Fischer zu den bedeutendsten ostdeutschen Photographen ihrer Generation gehört. Ihr photographisches Œuvre wurde entscheidend von ihrer kritischen Betrachtung der DDR-Wirklichkeit beeinflusst. In der DDR war die Photographie oft ein Mittel politischer Erziehung. Oppositionelle Standpunkte, die dem offiziellen, staatskonformen Blick ein anderes Bild entgegenstellten, wurden abgelehnt. Ursula Arnold zählte zu jenen Künstlern, die sich nicht einbinden ließen. Franziska Schmidt schrieb im Katalog zu der der Künstlerin gewidmeten Ausstellung in der Berlinischen Galerie: „[Ihre Bilder] zeigen die leisen und verborgenen Seiten des Lebens, in dem der Mensch allein mit sich selbst und den alltäglichen Sorgen ist. Ihre Bilder sind Ausdruck der Diskrepanz zwischen der propagierten ideologischen Darstellung des optimistischen Menschen als kämpferischer Held des Sozialismus und den herrschenden Verhältnissen.“ In den Worten der Künstlerin: „ Meine Sympathie gehört denen, die nicht zu den Herrschenden gehören. Ich möchte im Alltäglichen das Besondere und das Einfache suchen, Nuancen sammeln, die Leben ausdrücken ... in der Anonymität das Verwandte treffen.“ Ursula Arnold ist 1929 in Gera als Tochter eines Photographen geboren. Nach ihrem Studium der Photographie an der Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst in Leipzig hat sie versucht, als freiberufliche Photographin zu arbeiten, was ihr wegen ihrer individuellen Sichtweise der Arbeit nicht gelungen ist.
    [Show full text]
  • C. 1970 – C. 1990
    CONTESTED SPACE: THE HISTORY OF SQUATTING IN DIVIDED BERLIN C. 1970 – C. 1990. Peter Angus Mitchell Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of History, Classics, and Archaeology University of Edinburgh 2015 In Erwägung, daß da Häuser stehen während ihr uns ohne Bleibe laßt haben wir beschlossen, jetzt dort einzuziehen weil es uns in uns'ren Löchern nicht mehr paßt. - Bertolt Brecht, Resolution der Kommunarden (1934) Wir brauchen keine Hausbesitzer, denn die Häuser gehören uns. Wir brauchen keine Fabrikbesitzer, die Fabriken gehören uns. - Ton Steine Scherben, Die letzte Schlacht gewinnen wir (1972) ii for my mother and father I declare that this thesis is entirely my own work and that no part of it has previously been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification, nor has it been published in any form. 6 April 2015 iii ABSTRACT This thesis examines the history of urban squatting in East and West Berlin from c. 1970 to c.1990. In doing so, it explores the relationship between urban space, opposition and conformity, mainstream and alternative cultures, as well as questions of identity and belonging in both halves of the formerly divided city. During Berlin’s history of division, illegal squatting was undertaken by a diverse range of actors from across the period’s political and Cold War divides. The practice emerged in both East and West Berlin during the early 1970s, continuing and intensifying during the following decade, before the traditions of squatting on both sides of the Berlin Wall converged in 1989-90, as the city’s – and Germany’s – physical division was overcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Nationalbibliografie 2019 B 21
    Deutsche Nationalbibliografie Reihe B Monografien und Periodika außerhalb des Verlagsbuchhandels Wöchentliches Verzeichnis Jahrgang: 2019 B 21 Stand: 22. Mai 2019 Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (Leipzig, Frankfurt am Main) 2019 ISSN 1869-3954 urn:nbn:de:101-201811221226 2 Hinweise Die Deutsche Nationalbibliografie erfasst eingesandte Pflichtexemplare in Deutschland veröffentlichter Medienwerke, aber auch im Ausland veröffentlichte deutschsprachige Medienwerke, Übersetzungen deutschsprachiger Medienwerke in andere Sprachen und fremdsprachige Medienwerke über Deutschland im Original. Grundlage für die Anzeige ist das Gesetz über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNBG) vom 22. Juni 2006 (BGBl. I, S. 1338). Monografien und Periodika (Zeitschriften, zeitschriftenartige Reihen und Loseblattausgaben) werden in ihren unterschiedlichen Erscheinungsformen (z.B. Papierausgabe, Mikroform, Diaserie, AV-Medium, elektronische Offline-Publikationen, Arbeitstransparentsammlung oder Tonträger) angezeigt. Alle verzeichneten Titel enthalten einen Link zur Anzeige im Portalkatalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und alle vorhandenen URLs z.B. von Inhaltsverzeichnissen sind als Link hinterlegt. In Reihe B werden Medienwerke, die außerhalb des Ver- den, sofern sie eine eigene Sachgruppe haben, innerhalb lagsbuchhandels erscheinen, angezeigt. Außerhalb des der eigenen Sachgruppe aufgeführt, ansonsten unter der Verlagsbuchhandels erschienene Medienwerke die von Sachgruppe des Gesamtwerkes. Innerhalb der Sachgrup- gewerbsmäßigen Verlagen vertrieben werden, werden
    [Show full text]
  • Ts5590 1Klyimbvllbslt.Pdf
    From: Philipp Schorch, Daniel Habit (eds.) Curating (Post-)Socialist Environments April 2021, 344 p., pb., 76 b&w ill. 40,00 € (DE), 978-3-8376-5590-2 E-Book: PDF: 39,99 € (DE), ISBN 978-3-8394-5590-6 In which ways are environments (post-)socialist and how do they come about? How is the relationship between the built environment, memory, and debates on identity enacted? What are the spatial, material, visual, and aesthetic dimensions of these (post-) socialist enactments or interventions? And how do such (post-)socialist interventions in environments become (re)curated? By addressing these questions, this volume releases ›curation‹ from its usual museological framing and carries it into urban environments and private life-worlds, from predominantly state-sponsored institutional settings with often normative orientations into spheres of subjectification, social creativity, and ma- terial commemorative culture. Philipp Schorch is a professor of museum anthropology at Ludwig-Maximilians-Uni- versität in Munich, leading an ERC-project entitled »Indigeneities in the 21st Century«. He is also an honorary senior research associate at the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Cambridge. His research focuses on museums, ma- terial culture/history/theory, contemporary art and (post)colonial histories, the Pacific and Europe, and collaborations with Indigenous artists/curators/scholars. Daniel Habit (Dr.) is a senior lecturer at the Institute for European Ethnology and Cul- tural Analysis at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universiät in Munich, where he received his PhD with a thesis on the concept of The European Capital of Culture programme of the European Union. His current research project in cooperation with the DFG funded research group »Urban Ethics« deals with diverse processes of transformation in Bu- charest from a urban and moral anthropology perspective.
    [Show full text]