Political Developments and Unrests in Stara Raška (Old Rascia) and Old Herzegovina During Ottoman Rule

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Developments and Unrests in Stara Raška (Old Rascia) and Old Herzegovina During Ottoman Rule Radenko Šćekić DOI: 10.2298/BALC1546079S Original scholarly work Žarko Leković http://www.balcanica.rs Historical Institute of Montenegro Podgorica Marijan Premović Faculty of Philosophy Nikšić Political Developments and Unrests in Stara Raška (Old Rascia) and Old Herzegovina during Ottoman Rule Abstract: During the centuries of Ottoman rule the Tara and Lim river valleys (or Potarje and Polimlje respectively), the Pešter Plateau and Old Herzegovina saw much turbulence, wars, rebellions, population migrations. This chaotic situation was combined with the arbitrary and repressive conduct of local Ottoman feudal lords. Migrations, interethnic contacts and mixing of populations as well as an intensified Islamization process caused by a number of factors greatly complicated the situation. Albanian northward penetration along the Lim and into Pešter as well as the expan- sion of the Vasojevići tribe into the Upper Lim valley added to the complexity of the ethnic and demographic picture of the region. Perpetual rebellions against the Otto- man occupation eventually led to the liberation of the Serbian Orthodox population of these areas. Keywords: Stara Raška (Old Rascia), Brda (Highlands), Old Herzegovina, Ottoman Empire, rebellions, migrations Introduction or the sake of clarity let us first define some terms used in this article. Stara Raška (Old Rascia) is the old name for the area between the riv- ersF Drina and Ibar, the Tara and Zapadna (West) Morava. The backbone of the area is the river Lim, Pešter Plateau and Mt Zlatar. The area was the nucleus of Serbian statehood and culture both in the middle ages and later, and it has been known as a “link” connecting Serb-inhabited areas. Brda or Highlands is the old name for the area of present-day Montenegro between the rivers Lim and Tara in the north and the rivers Zeta and Morača in the south. It encompassed the tribal territories of Bjelopavlići, Piperi, Rovčani, Moračani, Kuči, Bratonožići and Vasojevići. The name became established in the eighteenth century for the areas of those highland tribes that did * [email protected] 80 Balcanica XLVI (2015) not manage to unite with the semi-autonomous region known as Nahiye Montenegro. In his History of Montenegro of 1754, the Montenegrin ruler and metropolitan Vasilije Petrović Njegoš describes the river Morača as the boundary between Montenegro and Brda. Piperi and Bjelopavlići united with the semi-autonomous Montenegrin state in 1779 de facto and in 1796 formally. By 1878 all Brda tribes were integrated within the Principality of Montenegro. Until the conquest of Buda in 1541, the Ottoman Empire’s Balkan possessions formed part of the eyalet of Rumelia with its centre in So- fia, and subsequently were divided into several newly-established eyalets (pashaliks). Pashaliks were subdivided into sanjaks, and these into smaller subdivisions such as kazas and nahiyes and administrative areas adminis- tered by mutesellims. Judicial districts, kadiliks, were considerably larger than nahiyes. Urban settlements were classified by importance and size into sehers, pazars and kasabas. By the end of the fifteenth century Ottoman rule in the Lim Polim( - lje) and Tara (Potarje) river valleys had been consolidated.1 The process of consolidation was accompanied by the construction or renovation of towns and fortresses which were to serve as administrative and military centres. The town of Brskovo had been taken in 1399, Bihor in 1455. In 1530 the Bihor garrison held eight timars, and the town developed and became the centre of the kadilik of Bihor. Livestock breeders in the area between the rivers Piva and Tara and in the Middle Lim valley were organized into the nahiye of Nikšići or Limski Nikšići.2 It was registered as a nahiye within the landholding of Isa Bey Isaković. The Upper Lim valley at first was incorpo- rated into the sanjak of Prizren.3 Tarski Nikšići encompassed several villages gravitating towards the river Tara.4 It may be assumed with much certainty that the Kuči tribe recognized Ottoman authority after the fall of the forti- fied town of Medun in 1457, and that Ottoman rule in Zeta and Brda was consolidated after the conquest of Scutari. 1 In the fifteenth century in these regions the construction of tribal society began on the ruins of the medieval Serbian feudal system. The organization of Ottoman rule in the tribal areas was based on lower self-governing units: nahija, knežina and village. Cf. Branislav Djurdjev, “Postanak i razvitak brdskih, crnogorskih i hercegovačkih plemena” (Titograd: CANU, 1984), 156. 2 Hazim Šabanović, Bosanski pašaluk (Sarajevo: Svjetlost, 1959), 34. 3 Miomir Dašić, Vasojevići od pomena do 1860. godine (Belgrade: Narodna knjiga, 1986), 99. 4 E.g. the villages of Tvrtkovici, Bistrica, Stričina, Bobanovići, Gojakovići, Bratojevići, Zorojevići, Kulizići, Lepenac, Obod, Cer, Ravna Reka. Cf. Žarko Šćepanović, “Pregled prošlosti Bijelog Polja i okoline do 1918. godine”, in Bijelo Polje (Belgrade: Stručna knjiga, 1987), 105. R. Šćekić, Ž. Leković & M. Premović, Political Developments 81 Territorial expansion of Montenegro After the Ottoman conquest the town of Pljevlja was renamed Tasli- ja. The Slavic name Bijelo Polje was translated into Ottoman Turkish and so it figures in Ottoman administrative and court documents as Akova. Over time it developed as an extension of better-known Nikolj-pazar.5 During the seventeenth century it grew into a major commercial centre of Bihor, and in the eighteenth century had the status of a kasaba (palanka, varoš). Documents of 1707 and 1717 already refer to the fortress of Akova, its garrison and commanding cadre. In 1707 its military commander was Cap- tain Suleiman Agha, and later documents make mention of the kadi of Bijelo Polje.6 The Orthodox merchants of the economically well-developed commercial quarter of Bijelo Polje had good commercial connections and traded in wax, hides, wool, livestock and furs. They would take their goods to the markets of Scutari and Dubrovnik (Ragusa), and return with weapons, clothing and copper. It has been estimated that their share of the wool im- 5 I. Stijepčević and R. Kovijanić, “Prvi pomeni Nikolj-pazara i Bijelog Polja”, Istorijski zapisi 7.10 (Cetinje 1954), 610–611. 6 Istorija Crne Gore, vol. III (Titograd: Istorijski institut, 1975), 519. 82 Balcanica XLVI (2015) ported into Dubrovnik in the eighteenth century was at least ten per cent.7 The nahiye of Komarani was in the Middle Lim valley, occupying most of today’s Bijelo Polje and Prijepolje areas.8 Budimlja was from the beginning of Ottoman rule the centre of the eponymous nahiye and kadilik, as well as the seat of an Orthodox bishopric. In 1477 it was referred to as being situated in the sanjak of Herzegovina, in the kadilik which had its seat at Prijepolje. Somewhat later, it was incorpo- rated into the sanjak of Prizren, and in the seventeenth century became the seat of a kadilik.9 In sixteenth- and seventeenth-century sources it figures as a pazar, or market place. Retaining a rural character, it never became developed enough to be granted the status of a kasaba and eventually lost all importance and was reduced to an ordinary village.10 There were in the Upper Lim valley three nahiyes: Budimlje (or Komnin), Plav and Zla Rijeka (or Zlorečica). Upon the establishment of the sanjak of Scutari, the nahiye of Budimlja, the abovementioned nahiyes and the nahiye of Komarani con- stituted the kaza of Bihor. At the end of the seventeenth century the kadi of Prijepolje had jurisdiction over Budimlja and the nahiye of Vraneš. There- fore Budimlja belonged to the sanjak of Herzegovina at the time, and later, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, to that of Scutari.11 Rožaj (Trgovište) figures as a fortification in the first half of the -sev enteenth century, and in the eighteenth century as a strong, heavily garri- soned fortress, especially during the Austro-Ottoman war of 1718–1739.12 The town of Plav was built in the early seventeenth century, by the order of the Ottoman central authority, on the site where the caravan route from Kotor to Metohija intersected with the road that ran along the river Lim and across the Prokletije Mountains to Scutari. The newly-built for- tress, whose construction had been overseen by Bosnian Mustafa Pasha, had a permanent garrison tasked with watching and keeping in check restive tribes in northern Albania and Brda.13 Fortress Gusinje built in 1611 was subsequently enlarged, and in the eighteenth century had a permanent garrison with aghas and a captain. 7 V. Vinaver, “Trgovina Bara”, Istorijski zapisi 6/9, 2, p. 472; M. Lutovac, Privreda, saobraćaj i naselja u Rožaju i Bihoru (Belgrade: Državna štamparija, 1930), 32. 8 Dašić, Vasojevići, 100. 9 Šabanović, Bosanski pašaluk, 165. 10 Istorija Crne Gore, vol. III, 518. 11 Dašić, Vasojevići, 99, 100, 211. 12 Gligor Stanojević, “Pokret brdskih i albanskih plemena uoči Kandijskog rata”, Istoriski zapisi XVII (1960), 523–522; N. K. Kostić, Naši gradovi na jugu (Belgrade: Državna štamparija, 1922), 77. 13 Evlija Čelebija, Putopis (Sarajevo: Svjetlost, 1957), 261, 262, 385, 404. R. Šćekić, Ž. Leković & M. Premović, Political Developments 83 Over time the village below the fortress grew into a small town thanks to its position on a caravan route.14 During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries Gusinje was not only a military but also a political and admin- istrative centre of the whole Upper Lim valley controlling the Vasojević tribal area. The fortress of Kolašin in the nahyie of Nikšići built by the Ottomans in the mid-seventeenth century had a permanent garrison which was sup- ported by the yearly tax (jizye) levied on the Christians of the nahiye of Peć. In judicial terms, it belonged to the kadilik of Prijepolje.15 The building and garrisoning of Kolašin strengthened the Ottoman feudal class in the Tara valley, creating “a fierce and deadly Muslim frontier” which exerted a strong pressure on the Orthodox areas of Rovca and Morača.16 There was also an Ottoman fortification on the Tara, on the site where the river was crossed by the trade route running from Risan via Onogošt and Jezero to Pljevlja.
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People
    60 ZuZana Poláčková; Pieter van Duin Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People The authors are focusing on how Montenegro today is coming to terms with the task of becoming a modern European nation, which implies recognition not only of democracy, the rule of law, and so forth, but also of a degree of ‘multiculturalism’, that is recognition of the existence of cultural, ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities in a society that is dominated by a Slavic Orthodox majority. In his context they are analyzing the history of the struggle of the Montenegrin people against a host of foreign invaders – after they had ceased to be invaders themselves – and especially their apparently consistent refusal to accept Ottoman sovereignty over their homeland seemed to make them the most remarkable freedom fighters imaginable and led to the creation of a special Montenegrin image in Europe. This im- age of heroic stubbornness and unique martial bravery was even consciously cultivated in Western and Central Europe from the early nineteenth century onwards, as the Greeks, the Serbs, the Montenegrins and other Balkan peoples began to resist the Ottoman Empire in a more effective way and the force of Romantic nationalism began to influence the whole of Europe, from German historians to British politi- cians, and also including Montenegrin and Serbian poets themselves. And what about the present situa- tion? The authors of this essay carried out an improvised piece of investigation into current conditions, attitudes, and feelings on both the Albanian and the Slavic-Montenegrin side (in September 2012). key words: Montenegro; history; multiculturalism; identity; nationalism; Muslim; Orthodox Montenegro (Crna Gora, Tsrna Gora, Tsernagora) is a small country in the Western Balkans region with some 625,000 inhabitants,1 which became an independent nation in 2006 and a can- didate-member of the EU in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Lakes in Serbia
    NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA Čika Ljubina 8, 11000 Belgrade Phone: +381 11 6557 100 Rivers and Lakes Fax: +381 11 2626 767 E-mail: [email protected] www.serbia.travel Tourist Information Centre and Souvenir Shop Tel : +381 11 6557 127 in Serbia E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA www.serbia.travel Rivers and Lakes in Serbia PALIĆ LAKE BELA CRKVA LAKES LAKE OF BOR SILVER LAKE GAZIVODE LAKE VLASINA LAKE LAKES OF THE UVAC RIVER LIM RIVER DRINA RIVER SAVA RIVER ADA CIGANLIJA LAKE BELGRADE DANUBE RIVER TIMOK RIVER NIŠAVA RIVER IBAR RIVER WESTERN MORAVA RIVER SOUTHERN MORAVA RIVER GREAT MORAVA RIVER TISA RIVER MORE RIVERS AND LAKES International Border Monastery Provincial Border UNESKO Cultural Site Settlement Signs Castle, Medieval Town Archeological Site Rivers and Lakes Roman Emperors Route Highway (pay toll, enterance) Spa, Air Spa One-lane Highway Rural tourism Regional Road Rafting International Border Crossing Fishing Area Airport Camp Tourist Port Bicycle trail “A river could be an ocean, if it doubled up – it has in itself so much enormous, eternal water ...” Miroslav Antić - serbian poet Photo-poetry on the rivers and lakes of Serbia There is a poetic image saying that the wide lowland of The famous Viennese waltz The Blue Danube by Johann Vojvodina in the north of Serbia reminds us of a sea during Baptist Strauss, Jr. is known to have been composed exactly the night, under the splendor of the stars. There really used to on his journey down the Danube, the river that connects 10 be the Pannonian Sea, but had flowed away a long time ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro's Tribal Legacy
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Montenegro's Tribal Legacy by Major Steven C. Calhoun, US Army Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. This article appeared in Military Review July-August 2000 The mentality of our people is still very patriarchal. Here the knife, revenge and a tribal (plemenski) system exist as nowhere else.1 The whole country is interconnected and almost everyone knows everyone else. Montenegro is nothing but a large family—all of this augurs nothing good. —Mihajlo Dedejic2 When the military receives an order to deploy into a particular area, planners focus on the terrain so the military can use the ground to its advantage. Montenegro provides an abundance of terrain to study, and it is apparent from the rugged karst topography how this tiny republic received its moniker—the Black Mountain. The territory of Montenegro borders Croatia, Bosnia- Herzegovina, Serbia and Albania and is about the size of Connecticut. Together with the much larger republic of Serbia, Montenegro makes up the current Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). But the jagged terrain of Montenegro is only part of the military equation. Montenegro has a complex, multilayered society in which tribe and clan can still influence attitudes and loyalties. Misunderstanding tribal dynamics can lead a mission to failure. Russian misunderstanding of tribal and clan influence led to unsuccessful interventions in Afghanistan and Chechnya.3 In Afghanistan, the rural population's tribal organization facilitated their initial resistance to the Soviets.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian Families' History and Heritage Making at the Crossroads of New
    Voicing the stories of the excluded: Albanian families’ history and heritage making at the crossroads of new and old homes Eleni Vomvyla UCL Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted for the award of Doctor in Philosophy in Cultural Heritage 2013 Declaration of originality I, Eleni Vomvyla confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature 2 To the five Albanian families for opening their homes and sharing their stories with me. 3 Abstract My research explores the dialectical relationship between identity and the conceptualisation/creation of history and heritage in migration by studying a socially excluded group in Greece, that of Albanian families. Even though the Albanian community has more than twenty years of presence in the country, its stories, often invested with otherness, remain hidden in the Greek ‘mono-cultural’ landscape. In opposition to these stigmatising discourses, my study draws on movements democratising the past and calling for engagements from below by endorsing the socially constructed nature of identity and the denationalisation of memory. A nine-month fieldwork with five Albanian families took place in their domestic and neighbourhood settings in the areas of Athens and Piraeus. Based on critical ethnography, data collection was derived from participant observation, conversational interviews and participatory techniques. From an individual and family group point of view the notion of habitus led to diverse conceptions of ethnic identity, taking transnational dimensions in families’ literal and metaphorical back- and-forth movements between Greece and Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • GENS VLACHORUM in HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs)
    ПЕТАР Б. БОГУНОВИЋ УДК 94(497.11) Нови Сад Оригиналан научни рад Република Србија Примљен: 21.01.2018 Одобрен: 23.02.2018 Страна: 577-600 GENS VLACHORUM IN HISTORIA SERBORUMQUE SLAVORUM (Vlachs in the History of the Serbs and Slavs) Part 1 Summary: This article deals with the issue of the term Vlach, that is, its genesis, dis- persion through history and geographical distribution. Also, the article tries to throw a little more light on this notion, through a multidisciplinary view on the part of the population that has been named Vlachs in the past or present. The goal is to create an image of what they really are, and what they have never been, through a specific chronological historical overview of data related to the Vlachs. Thus, it allows the reader to understand, through the facts presented here, the misconceptions that are related to this term in the historiographic literature. Key words: Vlachs, Morlachs, Serbs, Slavs, Wallachia, Moldavia, Romanian Orthodox Church The terms »Vlach«1, or later, »Morlach«2, does not represent the nationality, that is, they have never represented it throughout the history, because both of this terms exclusively refer to the members of Serbian nation, in the Serbian ethnic area. –––––––––––– [email protected] 1 Serbian (Cyrillic script): влах. »Now in answer to all these frivolous assertions, it is sufficient to observe, that our Morlacchi are called Vlassi, that is, noble or potent, for the same reason that the body of the nation is called Slavi, which means glorious; that the word Vlah has nothing
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Evaluation of Landscape As a Precondition for Planning Revitalization and Development of Mediterranean Rural Settlements—Case Study: Mrkovi Village, Bay of Kotor
    sustainability Article Identification and Evaluation of Landscape as a Precondition for Planning Revitalization and Development of Mediterranean Rural Settlements—Case Study: Mrkovi Village, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro Željka Curovi´cˇ 1 , Mili´c Curovi´cˇ 2, Velibor Spalevi´c 3, Milorad Janic 4, Paul Sestras 5 and Svetislav G. Popovi´c 6,* 1 Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro; [email protected] 2 Biotechnical Faculty, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Montenegro, 81400 Niksic, Montenegro; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Viseslava, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] 5 Department of Terrestrial Measurement and Cadastre, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400020 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] 6 Faculty of Architecture, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +382-69-101-747 Received: 1 March 2019; Accepted: 30 March 2019; Published: 5 April 2019 Abstract: This paper presents a case study of the village of Mrkovi in the Bay of Kotor, Montenegro, showing the importance of landscape identification and assessment in planning the revitalization and development of Mediterranean rural settlements. The research revealed the methods of identification and evaluation of different landscape types. Moreover, it showed how such an approach could considerably contribute to the preservation of the space’s identity and quality by taking into account the existing characteristics of the space or the relationship between cultural and natural heritage. The identification of the landscape types was followed by the evaluation of individual elements and assessment of vulnerability in relation to the space’s natural, cultural, and visual quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Kategorizaciji Državnih Puteva
    UREDBA O KATEGORIZACIJI DRŽAVNIH PUTEVA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 105/2013 i 119/2013) Predmet Član 1 Ovom uredbom kategorizuju se državni putevi I reda i državni putevi II reda na teritoriji Republike Srbije. Kategorizacija državnih puteva I reda Član 2 Državni putevi I reda kategorizuju se kao državni putevi IA reda i državni putevi IB reda. Državni putevi IA reda Član 3 Državni putevi IA reda su: Redni broj Oznaka puta OPIS 1. A1 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Horgoš) - Novi Sad - Beograd - Niš - Vranje - državna granica sa Makedonijom (granični prelaz Preševo) 2. A2 Beograd - Obrenovac - Lajkovac - Ljig - Gornji Milanovac - Preljina - Čačak - Požega 3. A3 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Batrovci) - Beograd 4. A4 Niš - Pirot - Dimitrovgrad - državna granica sa Bugarskom (granični prelaz Gradina) 5. A5 Pojate - Kruševac - Kraljevo - Preljina Državni putevi IB reda Član 4 Državni putevi IB reda su: Redni Oznaka OPIS broj puta 1. 10 Beograd-Pančevo-Vršac - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Vatin) 2. 11 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Kelebija)-Subotica - veza sa državnim putem A1 3. 12 Subotica-Sombor-Odžaci-Bačka Palanka-Novi Sad-Zrenjanin-Žitište-Nova Crnja - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Srpska Crnja) 4. 13 Horgoš-Kanjiža-Novi Kneževac-Čoka-Kikinda-Zrenjanin-Čenta-Beograd 5. 14 Pančevo-Kovin-Ralja - veza sa državnim putem 33 6. 15 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Bački Breg)-Bezdan-Sombor- Kula-Vrbas-Srbobran-Bečej-Novi Bečej-Kikinda - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Nakovo) 7. 16 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bezdan)-Bezdan 8. 17 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bogojevo)-Srpski Miletić 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Serbian, Montenegrin and Croatian Historiography on the Ottoman Empire
    Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 15, 2010, 697-714 Modern Serbian, Montenegrin and Croatian Historiography on the Ottoman Empire Ema MILJKOVIC* ALTHOUGH the first important studies dedicated to South-Slav history under the Ottoman rule and based on primary Ottoman sources were written before World War Two (some of them still being valid),1 the science of historiography in the former Yugoslavia began with serious research in this subject during 1950s. At that time, there were several centers for Ottoman studies, in Belgrade, Sarajevo and to a lesser extent, in Skopje. Podgorica and Zagreb have only developed interest in this field recently, as will be elaborated in this paper. A) Modern Serbian Historiography on the Ottoman Empire In spite of the fact that both Sarajevo and Belgrade were home to some very distinguished scholars in Ottoman history, and both cities had very influential Oriental studies programs at the university level, Sarajevo took the leading role as the primary academic center for Ottoman studies, which was due to a large part that the Institute of Oriental Studies (which has its own journal called Contributions for the Oriental Philology/Prilozi za orijentalnu filologiju) was located there. Belgrade had no such Institute or specialized center; within the Historical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts there was a special research unit, the members of which were experts on the Ottoman language and history.2 These experts * Prof., Ph. D., Faculty of Philosophy, Niš, Serbia 1 See works of Gliša Elezović and Fehim Barjaktarević. For more details on their life and work, as well as complete bibliographies: Ljiljana Čolić, Orijentalističko delo Gliše Elezovića (Gliša Elezović’s oriental studies), (Beograd: Filološki fakultet, 1996); Andjelka Mitrović, Naučno delo Fehima Barjaktarevića (Sci- entific work of Fehim Barjaktarević), (Beograd: Filološki fakultet, 1996).
    [Show full text]