Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) with a Brief Review of Important Characters
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.55
CHAPTER VIII SPONGES, COELENTERATES, AND CTENOPHORES Blank page retained for pagination THE PORIFERA OF THE GULF OF MEXICO 1 By J. Q. TIERNEY. Marine Laboratory, University of Miami Sponges are one of the dominant sessile inverte groups. The. floor of the Gulf between the bars brate groups in the Gulf of Mexico: they extend is sparsely populated. The majority of the ani from the intertidal zone down to the deepest mals and plants are concentrated on the rocky Parts of the basin, and almost all of the firm or ledges and outcroppings. rocky sections of the bottom provide attachment The most abundant sponges on these reefs are for them. of several genera representing most of the orders Members of the class Hyalospongea. (Hexacti of the class Demospongea. Several species of nellidea) are, almost without exception, limited to Ircinia are quite common as are Verongia, Sphecio the deeper waters of the Gulf beyond the 100 spongia, and several Axinellid and Ancorinid fathom curve. These sponges possess siliceous sponges; Cliona is very abundant, boring into spicules in which (typically) six rays radiate from molluscan shells, coral, and the rock itself. The II. central point; frequently, the spicules are fused sponge population is rich both in variety and in ~gether forming a basket-like skeleton. Spongin number of individuals; for this reason no attempt 18 never present in this group. is made to discuss it in taxonomic detail in this In contrast to the Hyalospongea, representa r~sum~. ti\Tes of the clasa Calcispongea are seldom, if Some of the sponges of the Gulf are of world ~\Ter, found in deep water. -
1 Creating a Species Inventory for a Marine Protected Area: the Missing
Katherine R. Rice NOAA Species Inventory Project Spring 2018 Creating a Species Inventory for a Marine Protected Area: The Missing Piece for Effective Ecosystem-Based Marine Management Katherine R. Rice ABSTRACT Over the past decade, ecosystem-based management has been incorporated into many marine- management administrations as a marine-conservation tool, driven with the objective to predict, evaluate and possibly mitigate the impacts of a warming and acidifying ocean, and a coastline increasingly subject to anthropogenic control. The NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) is one such administration, and was instituted “to serve as the trustee for a network of 13 underwater parks encompassing more than 600,000 square miles of marine and Great Lakes waters from Washington state to the Florida Keys, and from Lake Huron to American Samoa” (NOAA, 2015). The management regimes for nearly all national marine sanctuaries, as well as other marine protected areas, have the goal of managing and maintaining biodiversity within the sanctuary. Yet none of those sanctuaries have an inventory of their known species nor a standardized protocol for measuring or monitoring species biodiversity. Here, I outline the steps required to compile a species inventory for an MPA, but also describe some of stumbling blocks that one might encounter along the way and offer suggestions on how to handle these issues (see Appendix A: Process for Developing the MBNMS Species Inventory (PD-MBNMS)). This project consists of three research objectives: 1. Determining what species inventory efforts exist, how they operate, and their advantages and disadvantages 2. Determining the process of creating a species inventory 3. -
Changing Jellyfish Populations: Trends in Large Marine Ecosystems
CHANGING JELLYFISH POPULATIONS: TRENDS IN LARGE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS by Lucas Brotz B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Oceanography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2011 © Lucas Brotz, 2011 Abstract Although there are various indications and claims that jellyfish have been increasing at a global scale in recent decades, a rigorous demonstration to this effect has never been presented. As this is mainly due to scarcity of quantitative time series of jellyfish abundance from scientific surveys, an attempt is presented here to complement such data with non- conventional information from other sources. This was accomplished using the analytical framework of fuzzy logic, which allows the combination of information with variable degrees of cardinality, reliability, and temporal and spatial coverage. Data were aggregated and analysed at the scale of Large Marine Ecosystem (LME). Of the 66 LMEs defined thus far, which cover the world’s coastal waters and seas, trends of jellyfish abundance (increasing, decreasing, or stable/variable) were identified (occurring after 1950) for 45, with variable degrees of confidence. Of these 45 LMEs, the overwhelming majority (31 or 69%) showed increasing trends. Recent evidence also suggests that the observed increases in jellyfish populations may be due to the effects of human activities, such as overfishing, global warming, pollution, and coastal development. Changing jellyfish populations were tested for links with anthropogenic impacts at the LME scale, using a variety of indicators and a generalized additive model. Significant correlations were found with several indicators of ecosystem health, as well as marine aquaculture production, suggesting that the observed increases in jellyfish populations are indeed due to human activities and the continued degradation of the marine environment. -
Title Taxonomic Study on Hydrocoryne Miurensis (Hydrozoa
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository Taxonomic Study on Hydrocoryne miurensis (Hydrozoa : Title Hydrocorynidae) in Japan Author(s) Kubota, Shin PUBLICATIONS OF THE SETO MARINE BIOLOGICAL Citation LABORATORY (1988), 33(1-3): 1-18 Issue Date 1988-08-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/176151 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Taxonomic Study on Hydrocoryne miurensis (Hydrozoa: Hydrocorynidae) in Japan By Shin Kubota Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060, Japan With Text-figures 1-4 and Tables 1-2 Abstract The life cycle, nematocyst equipment, and the chromosomes of Hydrocoryne in Japan were studied from the taxonomic point of view. The morphology of Hydrocoryne was described and il lustrated in the following developmental stages: the well-developed polyp with or without medusa buds, the regenerated polyp, the primary polyp, the newly liberated medusa, the earliest mature medusa, the aged mature and spent medusae, and the young and aged planulae. The morphology of gametes was also described and illustrated. It is highly probable that only one species, referable to H. miurensis Stechow, 1907, occurs in Japanese waters. Hydrocor_yne is one of the metagenetic hydrozoans that has a large polyp and a small medusa. The colonial polyps are common on pebbles and rocks in shallow waters of rather open coasts in the North Pacific. Rees (1957) erected the mono typic family Hydrocorynidae in order to accomodate this genus and his diagnosis of the family was slightly emended by Uchida & Nagao (1967). -
Metazoa Based on How Organized They Are
BIOLOGY 18: Phyla of the “Changed Animals” Climbing the evolutionary lad- der from the protozoa we find higher levels of organization. Organisms are grouped into mesozoa and metazoa based on how organized they are. The simplest multicellular organisms (those having many cells) are the me- sozoa (“middle animals”). These or- ganisms are simple parasitic worms. Parasitic means that they live at the expense of some other organism. They often suck nutrient-rich fluids right out of the other organism, but they don’t usually kill the organism or they lose their source of food. The metazoa, meaning “changed animals” can be larger in size because they have different kinds of cells that work together to bring things in, take things out, protect the whole organ- ism, and perform other duties that enable them to live in a wider range of habitats. Because of the various cell types, organisms at this level be- gin taking on a variety of shapes that are not possible among colonies of identical cells. The metazoa include all other phyla of animals from the simple to the complex. A strawberry sponge of the phylum Porifera. Kingdom Animalia: Metazoa Kingdom Porifera Coelenterata Ctenophora Platyhelminthes Rhinochocoela Nematoda Acanthocephala Chaetognatha Nematomorpha Hemichordata (sponges) (flat worms) (proboscis, (round (spiny-headed (arrow (horsehair (acorn worms) nemertine & worms) worms) worms) worms) Phylum ribbon worms) 186 BIOLOGY The next set of organisms in terms of their simplicity is the phylum Porifera—the sponges. There are many types of these animals that live in the sea and a few that live in fresh water. -
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber ......................................................................... -
A5 BOOK ONLINE VERSION.Cdr
Book of Abstracts 4 - 6 NOVEMBER 2019 IZIKO SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM | CAPE TOWN | SOUTH AFRICA 6TH INTERNATIONAL JELLYFISH BLOOMS SYMPOSIUM CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA | 4 - 6 NOVEMBER 2019 PHOTO CREDIT: @Steven Benjamin ORGANISERS University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa SPONSORS University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa Iziko Museums of South Africa Two Oceans Aquarium De Beers Group Oppenheimer I&J Pisces Divers African Eagle Aix-Marseille Université, France Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, France LOCAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE, LSC Mark J Gibbons (University of the Western Cape) Delphine Thibault (Aix-Marseille Université) Wayne Florence (IZIKO South African Museum) Maryke Masson (Two Oceans Aquarium) INTERNATIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE, ISC Mark J Gibbons (Africa) Agustin Schiariti (South America) Lucas Brotz (North America) Jing Dong (Asia) Jamileh Javidpour (Europe) Delphine Thibault (Wandering) 6TH INTERNATIONAL JELLYFISH BLOOMS SYMPOSIUM CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA | 4 - 6 NOVEMBER 2019 C ONTENT S Contents Message from the convenor Page 1 Opening ceremony Page 6 Programme Page 8 Poster sessions Page 16 Oral presentaons Page 21 Poster presentaons Page 110 Useful informaon Page 174 Index of authors Page 176 List of aendees Page 178 6TH INTERNATIONAL JELLYFISH BLOOMS SYMPOSIUM CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA | 4 - 6 NOVEMBER 2019 Message from the Convenor: Prof Mark Gibbons On behalf of the Local Organising Committee, it gives me great pleasure to welcome you to Cape Town and to the 6th International Jellyfish Blooms Symposium. It promises to be a suitable finale to Series I, which has seen us visit all continents except Antarctica. Episode One kicked off in North America during January 2000, when Monty Graham and Jennifer Purcell invited us to Gulf Shores. -
Final Report
Developing Molecular Methods to Identify and Quantify Ballast Water Organisms: A Test Case with Cnidarians SERDP Project # CP-1251 Performing Organization: Brian R. Kreiser Department of Biological Sciences 118 College Drive #5018 University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, MS 39406 601-266-6556 [email protected] Date: 4/15/04 Revision #: ?? Table of Contents Table of Contents i List of Acronyms ii List of Figures iv List of Tables vi Acknowledgements 1 Executive Summary 2 Background 2 Methods 2 Results 3 Conclusions 5 Transition Plan 5 Recommendations 6 Objective 7 Background 8 The Problem and Approach 8 Why cnidarians? 9 Indicators of ballast water exchange 9 Materials and Methods 11 Phase I. Specimens 11 DNA Isolation 11 Marker Identification 11 Taxa identifications 13 Phase II. Detection ability 13 Detection limits 14 Testing mixed samples 14 Phase III. 14 Results and Accomplishments 16 Phase I. Specimens 16 DNA Isolation 16 Marker Identification 16 Taxa identifications 17 i RFLPs of 16S rRNA 17 Phase II. Detection ability 18 Detection limits 19 Testing mixed samples 19 Phase III. DNA extractions 19 PCR results 20 Conclusions 21 Summary, utility and follow-on efforts 21 Economic feasibility 22 Transition plan 23 Recommendations 23 Literature Cited 24 Appendices A - Supporting Data 27 B - List of Technical Publications 50 ii List of Acronyms DGGE - denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis DMSO - dimethyl sulfoxide DNA - deoxyribonucleic acid ITS - internal transcribed spacer mtDNA - mitochondrial DNA PCR - polymerase chain reaction rRNA - ribosomal RNA - ribonucleic acid RFLPs - restriction fragment length polymorphisms SSCP - single strand conformation polymorphisms iii List of Figures Figure 1. Figure 1. -
CNIDARIA Corals, Medusae, Hydroids, Myxozoans
FOUR Phylum CNIDARIA corals, medusae, hydroids, myxozoans STEPHEN D. CAIRNS, LISA-ANN GERSHWIN, FRED J. BROOK, PHILIP PUGH, ELLIOT W. Dawson, OscaR OcaÑA V., WILLEM VERvooRT, GARY WILLIAMS, JEANETTE E. Watson, DENNIS M. OPREsko, PETER SCHUCHERT, P. MICHAEL HINE, DENNIS P. GORDON, HAMISH J. CAMPBELL, ANTHONY J. WRIGHT, JUAN A. SÁNCHEZ, DAPHNE G. FAUTIN his ancient phylum of mostly marine organisms is best known for its contribution to geomorphological features, forming thousands of square Tkilometres of coral reefs in warm tropical waters. Their fossil remains contribute to some limestones. Cnidarians are also significant components of the plankton, where large medusae – popularly called jellyfish – and colonial forms like Portuguese man-of-war and stringy siphonophores prey on other organisms including small fish. Some of these species are justly feared by humans for their stings, which in some cases can be fatal. Certainly, most New Zealanders will have encountered cnidarians when rambling along beaches and fossicking in rock pools where sea anemones and diminutive bushy hydroids abound. In New Zealand’s fiords and in deeper water on seamounts, black corals and branching gorgonians can form veritable trees five metres high or more. In contrast, inland inhabitants of continental landmasses who have never, or rarely, seen an ocean or visited a seashore can hardly be impressed with the Cnidaria as a phylum – freshwater cnidarians are relatively few, restricted to tiny hydras, the branching hydroid Cordylophora, and rare medusae. Worldwide, there are about 10,000 described species, with perhaps half as many again undescribed. All cnidarians have nettle cells known as nematocysts (or cnidae – from the Greek, knide, a nettle), extraordinarily complex structures that are effectively invaginated coiled tubes within a cell. -
Scyphozoa: Coronatae) Support the Concept of Perennation by Tissue Saving and Con- Firm Dormancy
EXPERIMENTS IN NATURE AND LABORATORY OBSERVATIONS WITH NAUSITHOE AUREA (SCYPHOZOA: CORONATAE) SUPPORT THE CONCEPT OF PERENNATION BY TISSUE SAVING AND CON- FIRM DORMANCY Fábio Lang da Silveira1 (correspondence author; correspondência para), Gerhard Jarms2 & André Carrara Morandini1 Biota Neotropica v2 (n2) – http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v2n2/pt/abstract?article+BN02202022002 Date Received 07/19/2002 Revised 09/23/2002 Accepted 10/02/2002 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461, 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Tel.:+55-11-30917619 Fax: +55-11-30917513 2 Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany, Tel.: +49-40-428382086 Fax: +49-40-428382086 e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Stephanocyphistomae of Nausithoe aurea from São Paulo State, Brazil (in subtropical western South Atlantic wa- ters), were relocated with their substrata in nature to study their survivorship under control and and experimental series — i.e. the polyps in the original orientation and inverted, and in each series exposed and buried polyps. We found that N. aurea survives over 13 months in nature, between 1/3 – 1/4 of 268 stephanoscyphistomae as normal feeding polyps, by segmentation produces planuloids and rejuvenates the polyps — an additional explanation for clustering of the solitary stephanocyphistomae. Dormant living tissues within the periderm of the tube were considered resting stages. The results support the concept that coronates in general have the capacity to save all living tissue and transform it to the energy saving sessile stage — the perennial polyp. -
Downloaded Genomic (I
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/282285; this version posted March 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The mitochondrial genomes of the mesozoans Intoshia linei, Dicyema sp., and Dicyema japonicum Helen. E. Robertson1, Philipp. H. Schiffer1 and Maximilian. J. Telford1* 1 Centre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT *Author for correspondence: [email protected] +44 (0)20 7679 2554 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/282285; this version posted March 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The Dicyemida and Orthonectida are two groups of tiny, simple, vermiform parasites that have historically been united in a group named the Mesozoa. Both Dicyemida and Orthonectida have just two cell layers and appear to lack any defined tissues. They were initially thought to be evolutionary intermediates between protozoans and metazoans but more recent analyses indicate that they are protostomian metazoans that have undergone secondary simplification from a complex ancestor. Here we describe the first almost complete mitochondrial genome sequence from an orthonectid, Intoshia linei, and describe nine and eight mitochondrial protein-coding genes from Dicyema sp. and Dicyema japonicum, respectively. The 14,247 base pair long I. linei sequence has typical metazoan gene content, but is exceptionally AT-rich, and has a divergent gene order compared to other metazoans. -
QAPP Phytoplankton ID 2007-2008
QAPP Table of Contents LIS Water Quality Monitoring Zooplankton Identification Project 04/18/2018 Table of Contents Title/Signatures page Table of Contents A. Project Management………………………………………………………………... 1 1.1 Problem Definition………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Project Description………………………………………………………………. 2 1.3 Project Organization……………………………………………………………... 3 1.4 Distribution List…………………………………………………………………. 4 1.5 Description of Tasks…………………………………………………………….. 5 1.6 Project Report Schedule…………………………………………………………. 5 B. Measurement and Data Acquisition………………………………………………… 6 2.1 Sample Collection, Storage, and Processing…………………………………….. 6 2.1.1 Schedule of Sample Collection………………………………………………. 6 2.1.2 Sample Collection and Preservation…………………………………………. 6 2.1.3 Sample Handling, Tracking and Custody……………………………………. 9 2.1.4 Sample Processing/Zooplankton Identification and Enumeration ………….. 9 2.2 Data Analysis and Report Submission………………………………………….. 14 2.2.1 Spatial and Temporal Variation……………………………………………… 14 2.2.2 Reports……………………………………………………………………….. 14 2.3 Quality Control Requirements and Corrective Measures……………………….. 14 2.3.1 Sampling Quality Control……………………………………………………. 14 2.3.2 Analytical (Identification) Quality Control………………………………….. 15 2.4 Performance Audits……………………………………………………………... 16 2.5 Data Management……………………………………………………………….. 16 C. Assessment and Oversight………………………………………………………….. 16 3.1 Assessments……………………………………………………………………... 16 3.2 Management Reports……………………………………………………………. 17 D. Data Validation and Usability……………………………………………………… 17