DOCSLIB.ORG

The State of Lagoon Treatment in Missouri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The State of Lagoon Treatment in Missouri FEATURE Review by Phil Walsack The State Of Lagoon Treatment In Missouri Missouri has more than 900 Facts And Figures Left: Pacific’s new lagoon aeration system municipal governments, and many own was designed by Burns & McDonnell in 2019. The design flow of these 334 systems Right: Clarence’s lagoon in winter. Achieving and operate their wastewater systems. combined is 53.8 million gallons per ammonia compliance can be difficult when In addition to municipal ownership day (MGD) with actual flows of 37.3 the winter arrives. (cities, towns, and villages), public MGD. While most consider lagoon sewer districts and county governments technology a “smaller city” wastewater own an additional 124 systems. It is not solution, six cities discharge more than balance of discharging lagoons. While common knowledge, but there are more 1.0 MGD. Five of the six cities serve the number of communities is large, wastewater permits (called National more than 7,000 people. The six cities the population served is only 184,000. Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (with seven discharge permits) have a These smaller entities have a combined Permits or State Operating Permits) than combined design flow of 12.4 MGD, and design flow of 34.1 MGD and an there are communities; some entities an actual flow of 9.1 MGD. Overall, the actual flow of 23.2 MGD. Interestingly, may have more than one wastewater larger lagoon discharging communities actual flows are decreasing as the facility. represent 59,300 people. rural populations continue to move to Generally, wastewater treatment urban living environments. Permitted There are only 12 additional technologies can be divided into four actual flows are decreasing even though cities greater than 3,000 population major categories, including: mechanical; smaller systems have difficult inflow and discharging effluent from a lagoon lagoon; community septics; and non- infiltration (I&I) issues to solve. I&I is treatment system. The 12 cities have a discharging. The subject of lagoon stormwater and/or groundwater that combined design flow of 7.3 MGD and treatment systems has long been a enters the collection system piping prior an actual flow of 5.0 MGD. The mid- difficult and economically challenging to treatment. sized lagoon discharging communities reality for Missouri. Discharging lagoon represent 54,100 Missourians. systems are prevalent in the state. Ammonia There are 334 lagoon facilities that The next dataset brings into focus are permitted to discharge treated the most challenging and vexing of A primer about ammonia is a wastewaters into another water body Missouri’s wastewater challenges. Two worthy endeavor before reviewing such as a river, stream, creek, ditch, hundred ninety-two communities with water quality standards and regulatory losing stream or lake. 315 wastewater permits make up the compliance issues. Ammonia, and its 10 theReview November/December 2019 toxicity, is a major driver in any lagoon More Stringent Regulations promulgated by the United States treatment discussion. If you are not a Environmental Protection Agency These fun facts and statistics lead chemistry nerd, you can skip the rest (USEPA). It is referred to as “ammonia to a tough and expensive discussion of this paragraph, and just know that reduction for the protection of mollusks.” about the water quality discharging ammonia is toxic to fish. For the rest Mollusks include mussels and gill- from lagoon facilities (often referred of us chemistry enthusiasts, ammonia breathing snails. It is very important to as effluent). Over time, water quality is a byproduct of animal and human to note that regulations governing the standards have been tightened (i.e., waste. It is also described as a nutrient “ammonia reduction for mollusks” have made more stringent) by federal and that contains nitrogen and hydrogen. not been approved by MDNR. This is not state governments. Three periods of It is a colorless, pungent gas that is the law of the land…yet. regulatory tightening are noted. In highly soluble in water. Its chemical 2003, the Missouri Department of For Missourians, it is important formula is NH in the un-ionized form, 3 Natural Resources (MDNR) adopted not to confuse the two ammonia and NH + in the ionized form. Total 4 water quality standards for ammonia. regulatory reductions. Typical ammonia ammonia is the sum of NH and NH +. 3 4 In February 2014, MDNR classified concentrations in treated effluent under Ammonia is a preferred nitrogen- an additional 90,000 miles of streams, the current water quality standard are 1.4 containing nutrient for plant growth. initiating a period of more stringent milligrams/Liter (mg/L) in the summer It can be converted from Nitrite (NO ) 2 water quality standards for the state’s months (April 1 to Sept. 30), measured and Nitrate (NO ) by bacteria and then 3 water bodies. This period included new as a monthly average and 2.9 mg/L in used by plants. Ammonia is also one of regulations for “ammonia reduction the winter months (Oct. 1 to March 30), the most important pollutants because for the protection of fish.” Previously, again measured as a monthly average. it is common and can be chronically many wastewater facilities discharging Adherence to daily maximum values toxic (causing lower reproduction and to streams did not have ammonia are also applicable in all wastewater growth) and acutely toxic (causing limits. With five-year wastewater permits. Generally, these values would death) in aquatic life. The neutral, un- permit periods, watershed-based be cut in half by the proposed USEPA ionized form (NH ) is the most toxic. 3 permit synchronization, and extended regulations, if Missouri chose to adopt Temperature and pH also play a role. At schedules of compliance, the impact of them in the future. higher temperatures, concentrations of these ammonia limits are now being felt NH persist. As pH increases (especially When dealing with the current 3 statewide by smaller communities. ammonia reductions (protection of fish above 7.2), NH4+ is converted to NH3 and ammonia’s toxicity increases in Third, and on the regulatory horizon, populations) it is important to view water. is the 2013 water quality standards capital improvements necessary to Is your municipality prepared? Utilities face the potential for both malevolent acts and natural hazards. America’s Water Infrastructure Act implements new regulations to help municipalities prepare for these threats. Find out how you can stay ahead of upcoming deadlines with the help of our integrated team of water, physical and cybersecurity specialists at burnsmcd.com/AWIARegulations. www.mocities.com 11 2) Land Application Fifty-seven communities apply their wastewater directly to the land surface and do not allow it to reach a regulated water body. If land is available to purchase or lease, non-discharging systems provide cost-effective treatment because many of the water quality sampling requirements are avoided. A quick reference to this type of treatment is described in the “Water Quality Program Fact Sheet” (PUB-02669) provided by the MDNR located on the Department’s website. 3) Batch Releases New Haven’s aeration system in their lagoon treatment system. A variation of non-discharging system is winter-time effluent releases. further reduce ammonia concentrations. of utmost importance. Flow monitoring, Effluent limits for ammonia are less In the future, Missouri regulators may even the most rudimentary analysis, is stringent if the effluent can be held seek future ammonia reductions (to extremely valuable. Smoke-testing and in the summer (not discharged) and protect mollusks). Elected officials must more advanced I&I source identification released in the winter months. Systems take a longer view of capital improvement are keys to lagoon performance. that aggressively manage their collection expenditures in this regulatory climate. Collection system performance is the systems reducing their I&I and have Spending rate-payer funds in the near most overlooked, and yet the most lagoon storage capacity, are candidates term must be weighed against longer- important, operational variable in for this type of treatment/release term water quality standards. lagoon treatment facilities. schedule. Another treatment variant is the land application of wastewaters Collection System Piping Options For Treatment Success during the summer months and the release of treated effluent in the winter Before a discussion of treatment 1) Non-Discharging months. options is made, the operational concept For the 292 communities with 4) Regionalization of “pipes before plants” is paramount. discharging lagoon systems, future The wastewater collection system treatment decisions are daunting, but The term “regionalization” has been (the pipes in the ground transporting not impossible. There are options. For in existence in Missouri for decades wastewaters to the treatment facility) is smaller communities that are located but has been under-utilized as a the most expensive asset a community more than five miles or greater from treatment technique. This term refers owns. No other capital investment is another community, a non-discharging to independent public bodies working more costly. Collection-system piping wastewater treatment system is a viable together to share the responsibility is buried deeper than any other asset option. The term “non-discharging” of treating wastewaters. This shared and it is laid to an engineered grade, means that the wastewater is applied approach could entail the construction allowing sewage to flow downhill in a to the land’s surface through a series of a new facility that serves multiple subterranean environment. In lagoon of sprinklers (like a center pivot or communities, or the pumping of discharging systems, the operation and traveling gun style). The local soils and untreated wastewaters from a smaller prudent maintenance of collection- vegetation naturally treat the wastes and community to a larger community system piping is more important than the wastewaters are not allowed to enter that has treatment facility capacity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lagoons and Coastal Wetlands in the Global Change Context: Impacts and Management Issues
    LAGOONS AND COASTAL WETLANDS IN THE GLOBAL CHANGE CONTEXT: IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES International Conference 1. Title of the Project International Conference: “Lagoons and coastal wetlands in the global change context: Impacts and management issues” Venice, July 2003 Starting date: January 2003 2. Objectives of the Project The objective of the present project is to organise and hold an international conference to respond to the challenge of integrating global change issues in wetland management. The conference will have a multidisciplinary view and will be based on high level scientific expertise. The aim is to identify gaps, problems and success in wetland knowledge and management. CORILA is an association between the University of Padua, the University of Venice, the University Institute of Architecture in Venice and the National Research Council, for coordinating and managing the research on the Venice Lagoon system. CORILA is presently managing a large multidisciplinary scientific project on the lagoon of Venice which embraces biology, chemistry, morphology, modelling, architecture and economics and is networking 70 research bodies and institutions. CORILA is in constant dialogue with the Public Administrations and promotes the dissemination of the results of the research to the policy makers. CORILA stipulated an agreement with the UNESCO, Regional Office for Science and Technology, Venice, Italy for the promotion and coordination of scientific research on Venice lagoon system and coastal wetlands. UNESCO, Regional Office for Science and Technology, Venice, Italy has large competencies in wetlands and lagoons conservation, and particularly in the safeguarding of the Venice Lagoon. It is member of MARS (European marine research stations network) and promoter of MAB (Man and the biosphere world network) which promotes and demonstrates a balanced relationship between people and nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Characterization of Bioluminescence in Mangrove Lagoon, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, USVI
    Ecological Characterization of Bioluminescence in Mangrove Lagoon, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, USVI James L. Pinckney (PI)* Dianne I. Greenfield Claudia Benitez-Nelson Richard Long Michelle Zimberlin University of South Carolina Chad S. Lane Paula Reidhaar Carmelo Tomas University of North Carolina - Wilmington Bernard Castillo Kynoch Reale-Munroe Marcia Taylor University of the Virgin Islands David Goldstein Zandy Hillis-Starr National Park Service, Salt River Bay NHP & EP 01 January 2013 – 31 December 2013 Duration: 1 year * Contact Information Marine Science Program and Department of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 (803) 777-7133 phone (803) 777-4002 fax [email protected] email 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND: BIOLUMINESCENT DINOFLAGELLATES IN CARIBBEAN WATERS ............................................... 9 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 19 OBJECTIVE I. CONFIRM THE IDENTIY OF THE BIOLUMINESCENT DINOFLAGELLATE(S) AND DOMINANT PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES IN MANGROVE LAGOON ........................................................................ 22 OBJECTIVE II. COLLECT MEASUREMENTS OF BASIC WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS (E.G., TEMPERATURE, SALINITY, DISSOLVED O2, TURBIDITY, PH, IRRADIANCE, DISSOLVED NUTRIENTS) FOR CORRELATION WITH PHYTOPLANKTON
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.5 Marine Biology
    3.5 MARINE BIOLOGY 3.5.1 Introduction 3.5.1.1 Definition of Resource For purposes of this EIS/OEIS, marine biological resources are defined as marine flora and fauna and habitats that they occupy, occurring within the Point Mugu Sea Range, Mugu Lagoon, and the intertidal and nearshore environment of San Nicolas Island and Point Mugu. This section specifically addresses marine invertebrates and flora. Fish and sea turtles are addressed in Section 3.6, marine mammals are addressed in Section 3.7, and seabirds are addressed in Section 3.8. Threatened and endangered species, as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), are also addressed. Species that are federally listed are afforded a degree of regulatory protection, which entails a permitting process including specific mitigation measures for any allowable (incidental) impacts on the species. Species that are proposed to be listed by the USFWS are treated similarly to listed species by that agency; recommendations of the USFWS, however, are advisory rather than mandatory in the case of proposed species. A federally listed endangered species is defined as any species, including subspecies, that is “in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” A federally listed threatened species is defined as any species “likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” “Proposed” endangered or threatened species are those species for which a proposed regulation has been published in the Federal Register, but a final rule has not yet been issued. 3.5.1.2 Regional Setting The Sea Range straddles the ocean off Point Conception which is considered a major geographic feature that affects marine biological diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Habs in UPWELLING SYSTEMS
    GEOHAB CORE RESEARCH PROJECT: HABs IN UPWELLING SYSTEMS 1 GEOHAB GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY OF HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS GEOHAB CORE RESEARCH PROJECT: HABS IN UPWELLING SYSTEMS AN INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME SPONSORED BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON OCEANIC RESEARCH (SCOR) AND THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (IOC) OF UNESCO EDITED BY: G. PITCHER, T. MOITA, V. TRAINER, R. KUDELA, P. FIGUEIRAS, T. PROBYN BASED ON CONTRIBUTIONS BY PARTICIPANTS OF THE GEOHAB OPEN SCIENCE MEETING ON HABS IN UPWELLING SYSTEMS AND THE GEOHAB SCIENTIFIC STEERING COMMITTEE February 2005 3 This report may be cited as: GEOHAB 2005. Global Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms, GEOHAB Core Research Project: HABs in Upwelling Systems. G. Pitcher, T. Moita, V. Trainer, R. Kudela, P. Figueiras, T. Probyn (Eds.) IOC and SCOR, Paris and Baltimore. 82 pp. This document is GEOHAB Report #3. Copies may be obtained from: Edward R. Urban, Jr. Henrik Enevoldsen Executive Director, SCOR Programme Co-ordinator Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences IOC Science and Communication Centre on The Johns Hopkins University Harmful Algae Baltimore, MD 21218 U.S.A. Botanical Institute, University of Copenhagen Tel: +1-410-516-4070 Øster Farimagsgade 2D Fax: +1-410-516-4019 DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +45 33 13 44 46 Fax: +45 33 13 44 47 E-mail: [email protected] This report is also available on the web at: http://www.jhu.edu/scor/ http://ioc.unesco.org/hab ISSN 1538-182X Cover photos courtesy of: Vera Trainer Teresa Moita Grant Pitcher Copyright © 2005 IOC and SCOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Upwelling As a Source of Nutrients for the Great Barrier Reef Ecosystems: a Solution to Darwin's Question?
    Vol. 8: 257-269, 1982 MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Published May 28 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. / I Upwelling as a Source of Nutrients for the Great Barrier Reef Ecosystems: A Solution to Darwin's Question? John C. Andrews and Patrick Gentien Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville 4810, Queensland, Australia ABSTRACT: The Great Barrier Reef shelf ecosystem is examined for nutrient enrichment from within the seasonal thermocline of the adjacent Coral Sea using moored current and temperature recorders and chemical data from a year of hydrology cruises at 3 to 5 wk intervals. The East Australian Current is found to pulsate in strength over the continental slope with a period near 90 d and to pump cold, saline, nutrient rich water up the slope to the shelf break. The nutrients are then pumped inshore in a bottom Ekman layer forced by periodic reversals in the longshore wind component. The period of this cycle is 12 to 25 d in summer (30 d year round average) and the bottom surges have an alternating onshore- offshore speed up to 10 cm S-'. Upwelling intrusions tend to be confined near the bottom and phytoplankton development quickly takes place inshore of the shelf break. There are return surface flows which preserve the mass budget and carry silicate rich Lagoon water offshore while nitrogen rich shelf break water is carried onshore. Upwelling intrusions penetrate across the entire zone of reefs, but rarely into the Lagoon. Nutrition is del~veredout of the shelf thermocline to the living coral of reefs by localised upwelling induced by the reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project
    Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Marin County Open Space District With Funding from the California State Coastal Conservancy & the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers July 2006 Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final Public Reports Table of Contents Volume I I Executive Summary II Projecting the Future of Bolinas Lagoon ¢¡¤£ ¥ £ ¦¨§©£ ¥ ¥ £ ¤£ ¢ Volume II III Recent (1850-2005) and late Holocene (400-1850) Sedimentation Rates at Bolinas Lagoon ¤!#"%$&" '(!)*+#, - ./1032#4 5(276 2#8 IV Conceptual Littoral Sediment Budget 9¢:¤; < ; =¨>©; < < ; ? @ABCAA D¤E; ? F GA V Project Reformulation Advisory Committee Summary of Draft Public Report S S TT H¢I¢J%KMLN7OPORQ VI Peer Review and Public Comments on Previous Drafts Reports with Responses U¢V¤W X W Y¨Z©W X X W [ \]^_]] `¤aW [ b c] de¢f a. Peer Reviews of Administrative Draft Report and Responses b. Public Comment Letters on Public Draft Report c. Response to Public Comment Letters Report Availability The report is available in multiple formats: • The report may be read and downloaded from www.marinopenspace.org • CDs are available on request by writing to William Carmen, Project Manager Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study MCOSD 3501 Civic Center Drive Suite 415 San Rafael, CA 94903 Or email: [email protected] • Hard copies of the report are on loan at the following locations: Marin County Library Branches: Bolinas, Stinson Beach, Civic Center, Fairfax, Inverness, Marin City, Novato, Pt. Reyes Station & San Geronimo Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Aquatic Macrophytes and Algae of the Fosu Lagoon, Cape Coast
    Academic Research Publishing Group Academic Journal of Life Sciences ISSN: 2415-2137 Vol. 1 No. 1, pp: 14-19, 2015 URL: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=18&info=aims Assessment of the Aquatic Macrophytes and Algae of the Fosu Lagoon, Cape Coast. Ghana Felix Jerry Akpabey* Council for Scientific and Industrial Research -Water Research Institute. Environmental Biology and Health Division, P.O. Box AH 38, Achimota, Accra. Ghana Ruth Amole Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Water Research Institute. Environmental Biology and Health Division, P.O. Box AH 38, Achimota, Accra. Ghana Abstract: The Fosu Lagoon serves as a major ecological, economic and cultural (religious) significance to the inhabitants of the community. It provides livelihoods for local fishermen, as well as habitat for rare flora and fauna, is of key importance to the local climate and provided recreational opportunities for the inhabitants of Cape Coast. In recent years, increased human activities have led to deterioration of both fresh and coastal waters in many regions of the world. The Environmental Protection Agency of Ghana have rated the Fosu Lagoon as one such lagoon and is considered the third most polluted lagoon in Ghana after the Korle and Chemu lagoons. Climate change variability has been associated with declining water resources among other factors. Climate change studies in Ghana have shown that major basins in the country are already experiencing water stress and with increasing environmental deterioration, limited water availability and pollution would have tremendous negative impact on aquatic ecosystems including coastal waters such as lagoons. The study revealed that the Fosu Lagoon is covered with mats of mixed vegetation (with Paspalum vaginatum and Typha domingensis dominating) which grow around the banks and over shallow sections of the Lagoon and parts of the landing sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Sea Atoll Lagoons: Closed Nurseries for the Larvae of a Few Coral Reef Fishes
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 54(1): 206-227, 1994 CORAL SEA ATOLL LAGOONS: CLOSED NURSERIES FOR THE LARVAE OF A FEW CORAL REEF FISHES Jeffrey M. Leis ABSTRACT Lagoons of two western Coral Sea atolls (Osprey and Holmes Reefs) were sampled with oblique bongo-net tows and neuston tows a total of three times over 3 years. Equivalent samples were taken in the ocean nearby. Concentrations of oceanic larvae in the lagoons were 13-14% of concentrations in the ocean, but oceanic taxa constituted less than 1% of the larvae captured in the lagoons, Concentrations (number' m -') and abundances (number' m -2) of shorefish larvae were 4-10 times higher in the lagoon than in the ocean, but larvae of more shorefish taxa were found in the ocean, In the lagoons catches were heavily dominated by larvae of apogonids, clupeids, gobiids, pomacentrids and schindleriids, Taxonomic com- position in the lagoons varied little, Based on presence/absence, and sizes of the larvae captured, only 33 taxa (of 15 families) complete or probably complete their pelagic larval period within these atoll lagoons. These include (number of species where larvae were iden- tified below family level): Apogonidae (9), Atherinidae (2), Belonidae (I), Blenniidae (4), Bythitidae (I), Clupeidae (I), Gobiidae, Hemiramphidae, Lutjanidae (I), Microdesmidae (I), Nemipteridae (I), Pempherididae (I), Pomacentridae (3), Pseudochromidae (4), Schindleri- idae (I), Tripterygiidae. In contrast, many reef fishes (from 31 families) were found not to complete their pelagic phase in the lagoons. Thus, only a few fish taxa are capable of completing their life cycles in atoll lagoons, but larvae of most of those that do are abundant, These taxa have predominately closed populations, demonstrating that, contrary to the current paradigm, not all coral reef fishes live in predominately open populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Commercial Marine Fishing Regulations
    NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARINE FISHERIES ADMINISTRATION COMMERCIAL REGULATIONS – July 21, 2017 This publication is a summary of the New Jersey commercial fishing regulations at the time of publication. It is not the full law. Consult the Division of Fish & Wildlife (Division) for further details. All persons are reminded that the statutes, codes and regulations are the legal authorities. All laws and regulations relating to commercial fishing can be found in New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Titles 23 and 50, and New Jersey Administrative Code, Title 7, Subtitle E, Chapter 25 and 25A. NOTE: This publication may be revised throughout the year pending future regulatory changes. Please visit www.njfishandwildlife.com for updates. MINIMUM SIZE LIMITS OF FISH, CRUSTACEANS, OR MOLLUSKS OFFERED FOR SALE Species Inches American Eel 9 State of New Jersey Atlantic Cod 19 Chris Christie, Governor Atlantic Mackerel 7 Kim Guadagno, Lt. Governor Atlantic Menhaden No minimum size Black Drum 16 Department of Environmental Protection Black Sea Bass 11 Bob Martin, Commissioner Bluefish 9 Blueline Tilefish No minimum size Office of Natural and Historic Resources Cobia 37 Rich Boornazian, Assistant Commissioner Goosefish 17¹ Haddock 16 Division of Fish & Wildlife Kingfish 8 Larry Herrighty, Director King Mackerel 23 Vacant, Administrator, Marine Fisheries Pollock 19 Russ Allen, Chief, Bureau of Marine Fisheries Red Drum 18² Vacant, Chief, Bureau of Shellfisheries Scup (Porgy) 9 Matthew Brown, Acting Chief, Bureau of Law Enforcement Shark No minimum size Spanish Mackerel 14 The Division is a professional environmental organization dedicated to Summer Flounder 14 the protection, management, and wise use of the state's fish and wildlife Tautog 15 resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing of Coastal Upwelling in the South-Eastern Baltic Sea: Statistical Properties and Implications for the Coastal Environment
    Article Remote Sensing of Coastal Upwelling in the South-Eastern Baltic Sea: Statistical Properties and Implications for the Coastal Environment Toma Dabuleviciene 1,2,*, Igor E. Kozlov 1,2,3, Diana Vaiciute 1,2 and Inga Dailidiene 1 1 Natural Sciences Department, Klaipeda University, Herkaus Manto str. 84, LT-92294, Klaipeda, Lithuania; [email protected] (I.E.K.); [email protected] (D.V.); [email protected] (I.D.) 2 Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Universiteto ave. 17, LT-92294, Klaipeda, Lithuania 3 Satellite Oceanography Laboratory, Russian State Hydrometeorological University, Malookhtinsky Prosp., 98, 195196 Saint Petersburg, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +370-6516-1459 Received: 14 September 2018; Accepted: 3 November 2018; Published: 6 November 2018 Abstract: A detailed study of wind-induced coastal upwelling (CU) in the south-eastern Baltic Sea is presented based on an analysis of multi-mission satellite data. Analysis of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) sea surface temperature (SST) maps acquired between April and September of 2000–2015 allowed for the identification of 69 CU events. The Ekman-based upwelling index (UI) was applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the satellite measurements for upwelling detection. It was found that satellite data enable the identification of 87% of UI-based upwelling events during May–August, hence, serving as an effective tool for CU detection in the Baltic Sea under relatively cloud-free summer conditions. It was also shown that upwelling-induced SST drops, and its spatial properties are larger than previously registered. During extreme upwelling events, an SST drop might reach 14 °C, covering a total area of nearly 16,000 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Use of Sediments for the Venice Lagoon Salt-Marsh Restoration
    Re-use of sediments for the Venice Lagoon salt-marsh restoration Giovanni Cecconi1, F.Angelotti2, M.Bertoldi2, C.Cerasuolo1, C.Zago2 1Consorzio Venezia Nuova, S.Marco 2803, Venezia, Italy Phone: +39-0412753749 2Technital S.p.A., Via Carlo Cattaneo 20, Verona, Italy E-mail: giovanni.cecconi@consorziovenezianuova. com Lagoons represent transitional areas between the land Therefore, the protection of marsh habitats is and the sea. Exposed to an intense environmental instrumental for the lagoon ecosystem as a whole. gradient, lagoons provide a particularly rich and During the last twenty years, the Consorzio Venezia diversified ecosystem maintained by the presence of Nuova, on behalf of the Venice Water Authority marshes, along with the associated mudflats and (Magistrato alle Acque), has conducted numerous channels, increases its complexity. These marshes studies regarding the hydro-morphological processes should be considered as morphological elements of in the lagoon and the characteristics of sediments fundamental importance. First, the marsh areas play from dredging activities, the latter being used for the an important ecological role as areas of reproduction construction of marsh lands. Several works have and shelter for many species such as birds, fish and been carried out for the recovery of the lagoon shellfish. Further, the marshes act as areas of high morphology with the general objective to slow down productivity, able to deliver organic substances and the tendency of loosing its proper hydro- nutrients to close by habitats. This expedites the morphological structure. If this structure is lost, the functions of growth as well as the filtering of lagoon could lose the natural characteristics which pollutants from rivers and other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • ATOLL RE3EARCH BULLETIN 9. the Coral Reefs of Urno Atoll., Marshall
    ATOLL RE3EARCH BULLETIN ---.. 9. The Coral Reefs of Urno Atoll., Marshall Islands Issued by THE PncIiw SCIENCE EO~D National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council Rashington, D. 2. December 15, 1951 SCIINTIE'IC I>JVF;STIGATI(!NS IN i.iIC1JUPESIA - P:?cii'ic Science bard An atoll. has 8. top tha%'s S1n.t And fe,s.tureless extremely. Corals and. algae make a mat Where mountains are not seemly. John 1. l'ells Cornell University December 1951 The aufJno? of this report participated in the 1950 SIM (Sc-entific Investigations in Micronesj.a) Project of the Pacific Science Board of the National Research Council. This project ties support,ed bf funds granted to the Nstionai 4ca3emy of Sciences the Office of N~valResearch, and the fie16 work was carried 0u.t with the active assistance of the Navy Lie?artment, the Military Air Transport Service, and the officials of the Civil lidminjstrative Staff of the Trust Territory (Navy). To all of the above who helped to make possibie the research described in this report I wish to express sy gratitude and sppreciction. Special thanks are due to Mr. 3onald F'. Squires (Cornell '50) without whose able assistance in the field much less would have been accomplished. Page I F:.elcj, -----.------.---.-------------- 1 A. Reefs ?. B. Lagoon 3A. C. Collections i 11. Stri-ct~reand F'nysical Processes ------ 2 A. (;eneral. Sta terne?.t -- 2 B. Structure of Che Atoll Islands ---- 3 C. Surface Processes 2nd Chacgee ----- 5 D. Reef Types " E. Lanoon Reefs ...................... 0 i P. Corc1 Knolls ---- -.-- 9 ZII.
    [Show full text]