DOCSLIB.ORG

Itasca County Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ITASCA COUNTY COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN August, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 I. Introduction 8 A. Planning and Cooperation 8 B. Plan requirements 10 C. Eight step process 10 D. List of Participants 11 E. Wildland/Urban Interface Planning Areas 12 F. Recommendations 12 II. Fire Policies and Programs 13 A. Healthy Forest Initiative 14 B. Stewardship Contracting 14 C. Hazardous Fuels Reduction Act 15 D. National Fire Plan 16 E. 10 Year Comprehensive Strategy 16 F. FEMA – Disaster Mitigation Act 16 III. Itasca County Profile 17 IV. Fire Management Overview 17 A. Fire History 17 B. Fire Behavior 19 1. Fire Behavior Prediction Systems and Fuel Modeling 19 a. The Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System b. Behave Plus c. The National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) 2. Buffers 24 3. Definition of Fire Regime/Condition Class 25 4. Community Fire Regime/Condition Class 26 5. Historic Fire Regime Map 27 6. Condition Class Map 28 7. Fire Hazard 29 8. Seasonal weather patterns affecting fire behavior 29 C. Fire Safety and Prevention 30 1. Fire Prevention and Education (Community Outreach) 30 2. Prevention Goals 31 3. Key Prevention Actions 32 4. Activities for Community Fire Protection 32 D. Fire Management 34 1. Wildland Fire Management 35 2. You and Your Local Fire Department 35 3. Assessment of Fire Hazard Risk 35 4. Itasca County Level 1 Assessment Map 36 5. Community Resource Information 37 ii V. Wildland/Urban Interface Community Boundaries 38 A. Itasca County Communities and Neighborhoods 38 B. Fire Districts and Unprotected Areas 39 C. WUI Base Map and Fire Department Protection Areas 40 D. State and Federal Wildland Fire Jurisdictional Map 41 VI. Wildland/Urban Interface Community Descriptions 42 A. Balsam B. Bearville C. Bigfork D. Bovey E. Blackduck F. Calumet G. Cohasset H. Coleraine I. Deer River J. French K. Goodland L. Grand Rapids M. Hill City N. Keewatin O. Marble P. Nashwauk Q. Northome R. Squaw Lake S. Taconite T. Warba/Seeley/Sago VII. Wildfire Risk Assessment 92 A. Hazard and Risk 92 B. Values 94 C. Protection Capabilities 95 D. Community Vulnerability Summary 96 E. Fuel Hazards 97 F. Itasca County Fuel Model Map with NFDRS Fuel Types 98 VIII. Emergency Operations 99 A. Protection Capabilities 99 B. Structural Ignitability 100 C. Infrastructure Values at Risk 106 D. Inventory of Protection Resources 107 iii IX. Mitigation Action Plan 109 A. Implementation Team 109 B. Evacuation Plan 110 C. Contact Numbers 111 D. Emergency Contacts 111 E. Current activities and projects 111 F. Hazardous Fuel Mitigation 112 1. Hazardous Fuels Map Sequence 112 a. Spring/Fall Season Hazard Risk Map 112 b. Summer Season Hazard Risk Map 113 c. Combined Wildfire Hazardous Fuel Map 114 2. Priority Fuel Treatment Criteria 115 3. Ongoing Fuel Treatment Area Identification 115 4. Fuel Mitigation Methods 115 G. Ongoing fuel treatment goals 117 H. Monitoring and Evaluation 118 Appendix: A. Glossary 120 B. 2006 Public Comments Summary 122 C. Itasca County Land Department Biophysical Information 125 D. Grant and Funding Opportunities 134 E. References 143 F. Additional Information 143 iv Executive Summary Recent wildfire events in the State of Minnesota, like the 2007 Ham Lake Fire, have heightened awareness of the destructive potential of wildfire. Under the auspices of the Itasca County Board of Commissioners local, state and federal agencies began the cooperative work in 2004 to identify risks associated with wildfire and develop the Itasca County Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). The overarching goal for the project is to protect lives and livelihoods throughout Itasca County. What is the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP)? A CWPP is a planning and prioritization process that helps communities establish local priorities to protect property and critical infrastructure. Itasca County has chosen to adopt a county wide plan that reflects the rural nature of this forested county. The Itasca CWPP is a living document meant for review and revision as the needs of Itasca County change over time Adoption: The Itasca County Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) meets the Federal requirements of the 2003 Healthy Forest Restoration Act: 1. Being developed collaboratively by multiple agencies at the state and local level in consultation with federal agencies and other interest parties: 2. Prioritizing and identifying fuel reduction treatments and recommending the types and methods of treatments to protect communities at risk and infrastructure throughout Itasca County. 3. Recommend measures which private landowners and communities can recommend methods to reduce structural ignitability within the planning area. How were wildfire risks identified for Itasca County? Information included in the CWPP is only a starting point for discussions. Project priorities should be developed cooperatively with land agencies, community leaders, and rural fire departments and citizens. Projects will need “on-the-ground assessments” to create effective hazardous fuel treatments. Many sources of information were collected and shared to create computer based GIS (geographic information system) wildfire risk models for Itasca County. Information may be used by communities to evaluate risk related to wildfire: 1. Fuel Hazards (current vegetation). 2. Risk of wildfire occurrence (history, location & causes of wildfires). 3. Essential infrastructure risk (homes, businesses, communication systems, roads). 4. Other community values at risk (economically, or culturally significant sites). How can the Itasca CWPP be used? The Itasca CWPP provides the basic framework for addressing issues surrounding wildfire protection and is designed to build a strong partnership between public agencies and local communities throughout the county. The Itasca CWPP may be used by citizens, local units of government and communities to apply for grants for hazardous fuel reduction and wildfire prevention projects. How can I get a copy of the Itasca CWPP? Copies are available on the Itasca County website at www.co.itasca.mn.us Printed copies may be obtained through Itasca County Courthouse, Administrative Services, located at 123 NE Fourth Street, Grand Rapids, MN 55744. 218-327-2847. 5 2008 - 2009 Itasca CWPP Implementation Team Action Plan 1. Increase educational efforts to inform citizens of wildfire hazards and available mitigation measures with Firewise Program: a. Itasca County Firewise Coordinator: As requested in the 2008 Firewise Grant, continue with 2500 Level 2 Assessments. Continued training for RFD’s, coordinate outreach etc.. Homeowners with a High or Extreme rating will be contacted and work with homeowner to develop specific recommendations to reduce risks. b. Coordinator will attend National Firewise Conference in November 2008, write a summary or ‘lessons learned report’ to the CWPP Implementation Team. c. Increase Public Awareness: articles, homeowner tips (newspaper and radios) and participate in community events. d. SWCD: develop Itasca Firewise Website., provide Firewise Program and message to Area Lake Associations and SWCD clients. e. Leech Lake Firewise: continue cooperative work with Itasca County Project. f. Creation of Vendors List of qualified vendors. To be shared with homeowners and communities looking for support for mitigation activities. g. Program promotion for cost share program, workshops, canister collection sites and training. 2. Support local fire departments with recruitment, retention and training needs to increase fire protection capabilities. a. This is an emerging national and state issue. Itasca CWPP Implementation Team will work with Itasca County Chiefs Association to identify local needs and develop strategies that will improve RFD effectiveness. Seek funding to develop a local media campaign. b. Support and assist fire departments in assessing and identifying department needs and identifying resources that will increase fire protection capabilities. c. Initial Attack Reference Guide for Rural Fire Departments and others that respond to wildfire and other emergency situations. This informational resource would include information about: water resources; location of dry hydrants, staging areas for equipment and people, and helispots; information on infrastructure, such as power lines, pipelines, railroads, etc.; and contact information for people and resources. Information can be shared among all emergency agencies that may deliver services during a local disaster. This project will take additional funding and dedicated staff time. 3. Hazardous fuel reduction areas. a. Delineate 6 Hazardous Fuel Reduction Areas as identified in the Itasca CWPP: Cutfoot Sioux Area, SE Itasca County (Blackberry, Pengilly, Warba, Wawina), NE Itasca County (Thistledew, Bear River & Link Lake Trail), Heavy urban interface area of Grand Rapids/ Cohasset, Deer River-Ball Club Area and the Central Lakes Corridor (Marcell, Bigfork, Suomi). b. Incorporate appropriate GIS infrastructure layers (roads, homes, water resources, RFDs etc.) that will help identify and prioritize projects within 6 HFRA’s . 6 c. Convene meetings with stakeholder groups: RFD’s, Local Units of Government Officials, Landowners and managers along with interested community members to ‘ground truth’ hazards to reduce risks. 4. Hazardous fuel mitigation treatments a. Develop Itasca County Firewise Cost Share Program: Encourage landowners to embrace Firewise principals and practices including hazardous fuel removal, improvement of defensible space, improving emergency access/egress
Recommended publications
  • Safety Alert 21-01 (Pilot Transfer Arrangements) V1.0

    Safety Alert 21-01 (Pilot Transfer Arrangements) V1.0

    SAFETY ALERT 2021-01 Version No. 1 Issue Date 08/01/2021 Pilot transfer arrangements 1. Purpose 1.1. This Safety Alert is issued by The Bahamas Maritime Authority (BMA) to bring the results of the International Maritime Pilot Association (IMPA) Safety Campaign 2020 to the attention of seafarers, pilots, owners, managers and Classification Societies. 2. Introduction 2.1 IMPA represents the international community of pilots. It conducts an annual safety campaign with the objective of reporting pilots’ experiences of ladders and boarding equipment to the International Maritime Organization and the wider shipping community. This year’s campaign is especially relevant following the tragic death of two pilots, whilst attempting to board vessels using combination ladders, since the last campaign. 2.2 2020’s campaign received 6394 reports from pilots operating across the world. Broadly in line with previous years’ findings, 12.11% of arrangements were reported to be non- compliant with combination ladders and pilot ladders having the most defects by both number and percentage. SA 2021-01 SAFETY ALERT Page 1 of 4 SAFETY ALERT [YEAR CREATED]-01 3. Common defects 3.1 Broadly, reported defects can be categorised in to four areas: design, procedure, rigging and maintenance. 3.2 Procedural issues can be avoided through clear communication and implementation of requirements: 3.3 Defects identified in the rigging and maintenance of ladders are generally self- explanatory and can be reduced through an effective planned maintenance regime and consistent application of guidance: 3.4 Many of the common issues found with securing of pilot ladders are steps taken by crews as a way to work around constraints imposed by deck cargo, loading or other prevailing circumstances.
  • California Community Colleges the League for Innovation Career Ladders Research In

    California Community Colleges the League for Innovation Career Ladders Research In

    Career Ladders Research in the California Community Colleges Presented to The League for Innovation Linda Collins Regina Stanback Stroud William Watson March 7, 2005 With Thanks To… o Board of Governors - California Community Colleges o Chancellor’s Office - California Community Colleges o David and Lucile Packard Foundation o Foothill-De Anza Career Ladders/Help Desk Project o Foundation for California Community Colleges o James Irvine Foundation o Walter and Elise Haas Fund o William and Flora Hewlett Foundation THE VISION o The community colleges are an effective and central part of a unified approach to workforce development in California—one that is founded on career ladders, universal, seamless, regional, strategic and collaborative. o All the components of the workforce development system are working together in an integrated fashion. A system of career ladders provides opportunity for all Californians to attain jobs that provide a living wage and to advance to positions requiring greater skills, responsibilities, and accordingly, higher pay. o Employer needs are better met, and workforce and economic development in California is enhanced by the increasing supply of skilled workers. (Ladders of Opportunity, BOG-CCC 2001) Career Ladders can help students: n Move within and across programs in the college n Move between the college and other educational institutions n Benefit from the multiple missions of the CCC’s – basic skills, vocational education, general education, and transfer n Move along educational and career pathways n
  • Sunbow Ii, Phase 3 Project Fire Protection Plan

    Sunbow Ii, Phase 3 Project Fire Protection Plan

    Appendix H3 Fire Protection Plan SUNBOW II, PHASE 3 PROJECT FIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared for: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 16465 Via Esprillo, Suite 150 San Diego, California 92127 Contact: David Shepherd Project Applicant ACI Sunbow, LLC 2356 Moore Street San Diego, California 92110 Contact: Bill Hamlin Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 MARCH 2021 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. VII 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Applicable Codes and Existing Regulations .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Project Summary ................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Proposed Project Description ................................................................................................... 2 2 PROPOSED PROJECT SITE RISK ANALYSIS...................................................................................................
  • Evaluating the Results of a Modified Bunker Gear Policy

    Evaluating the Results of a Modified Bunker Gear Policy

    Format changes have been made to facilitate reproduction. While these research projects have been selected as outstanding, other NFA EFOP and APA format, style, and procedural issues may exist. EVALUATING THE RESULTS OF A MODIFIED BUNKER GEAR POLICY EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT BY: David Mager Boston Fire Department Boston, Massachusetts An applied research project submitted to the National Fire Academy as part of the Executive Fire Officer Program September 2002 - 1 - Format changes have been made to facilitate reproduction. While these research projects have been selected as outstanding, other NFA EFOP and APA format, style, and procedural issues may exist. - 2 - Format changes have been made to facilitate reproduction. While these research projects have been selected as outstanding, other NFA EFOP and APA format, style, and procedural issues may exist. ABSTRACT In August 2000, Boston Fire Department (BFD) modified its mandatory bunker gear policy to permit less than full bunker gear. The problem was that no evaluation of the policy change was performed to determine whether or not firefighter safety was enhanced. The purpose of this research was to determine if modifying the BFD bunker gear policy enhanced firefighter safety. An historical and evaluative research methodology was used to answer the following questions: 1. Prior to the modification of the bunker gear policy, what was the injury rate for heat stress injuries on the fireground? 2. Did the rate of heat stress injuries go down after the modification of the policy? 3. Did any other category of injuries increase after the policy change? 4. What must BFD do to ensure optimum safety for its firefighters? The procedures involved an examination of injury statistics before and after the change.
  • Teacher's Guide

    Teacher's Guide

    Florida Wildfi re Prevention . his Teacher’s Guide, along with the Florida Wildfi re CD-ROM, Prevention is designed to help you explore with your students the T importance of fi re to Florida’s ecosystem. We hope you fi nd these tools useful as you and your students set out to discover how fi re is used to properly manage and maintain an infi nitely renewable resource... our Florida forests. We are confi dent that you and your students will enjoy the challenges of this CD-ROM. ** Register for a Wildfi re Prevention Workshop at: www. itm-info.com/wildfi re MODIFIED 08/03/04 Interactive Training Media, Inc. 2625 Mitcham Drive :: Tallahassee, FL 32308 850.877.5865 :: Toll Free 1-866-463-6486 http://www.itm-info.com Teachers may photocopy the reproducible pages in this book for classroom use. No portion of this information may be used in any manner by any person or organization without the express written permission of Interactive Training Media, Inc. © 2004 Interactive Training Media, Inc. Wildfi re Prevention Teacher’s Guide Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................3 PURPOSE USE IN THE CLASSROOM REQUIRED COMPUTER EQUIPMENT INTRODUCTORY VIDEO PRETEST/POST-TEST LOG-IN EXERCISE INSTALLATION / USER TIPS CD-ROM FLOW CHART ........................................................................................................................5 WHAT IS FIRE? .....................................................................................................................................6
  • The Homeowner's Bushfire Survival Manual

    The Homeowner's Bushfire Survival Manual

    THE HOMEOWNER’S BUSHFIRE SURVIVAL MANUAL September 2014 | Sixth Edition Don’t let this happen to you … THE HOMEOWNER’S BUSHFIRE SURVIVAL MANUAL September 2014 | Sixth Edition ISBN 978-0-9872070-5-0 Published by: Department of Fire and Emergency Services Environmental Protection Branch Postal Address: GPO Box P1174 PERTH WA 6844 Telephone: (08) 9395 9300 Email: [email protected] Web: www.dfes.wa.gov.au The information contained in this publication is provided voluntarily as a public service by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES). This publication has been prepared in good faith and is derived from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time for publication. Nevertheless, the reliability and accuracy of the information cannot be guaranteed and DFES expressly disclaims liability for any act or omission done or not done in the reliance on the information and for any consequences whether direct or indirect, arising from such act or omission. This publication is intended to be a guide only and readers should obtain their own independent advice and make their own necessary inquiries. Contents Introduction . 1 You are in control . 1 Bushfire behaviour and fuels . 2 Bushfire history — what we have learnt . 4 Prepare your home. 6 Building Protection Zone . 6 Understanding your risk. 8 Routine maintenance — small jobs can save lives . 9 House protection — upgrading of existing buildings . 12 Building in bushfire threat areas . 16 Prepare your property . 21 Hazard Separation Zone . 21 General garden design . 21 Remove fuels . 22 Landscape for safety. 23 Selection and placement of plants . 24 Use your trees .
  • Bunker Gear for Fire Fighters: Does It Fit Today’S Fire Fighters?

    Bunker Gear for Fire Fighters: Does It Fit Today’S Fire Fighters?

    Volume 9, Issue 3, 2015 Bunker Gear for Fire Fighters: Does it fit today’s fire fighters? Lynn M. Boorady, Associate Professor and Chair, Fashion and Textile Technology Department, State University of New York - Buffalo State ABSTRACT The fit of bunker gear is important to ensure the protection of the firefighter when they are combating structural fire and performing other hazardous duties. Bunker gear is regulated by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) which requires a range of sizes and certain fit regulations due to safety. Firefighters are a specific segment of the population which may be appropriate for a specific sizing scheme. Body scans of career and volunteer male firefighters were compared to SizeUSA data. Differences were found in the height and weight, with male firefighters being heavier and taller than the general population. This research also looks at the procurement and sizing of bunker gear, analyzes body scan data specific to the firefighter population and suggests developing a sizing system specific to this population. A larger study would need to be conducted in order obtain statistically significant results. Keywords: Bunker gear, Firefighter protection, Turnout gear Introduction is needed in order to create a sizing scheme The image of the heroic fire fighter is for this target market. iconic. Firefighting is considered a According to the U.S. Fire prestigious occupation by 97% of the Administration, in 2013 there were 1,140,750 American public, according to a 2006 Harris fire fighters in the United States. Of those, Poll. Fire fighters walk into fire engulfed 354,600 were professional (or “career”) and buildings to save lives, put themselves in 786,150 were volunteers (U.
  • ROWLETT, TEXAS FIRE RESCUE Entry Level Applicant JOB TASK SIMULATION TEST ADMINISTRATION GUIDE

    ROWLETT, TEXAS FIRE RESCUE Entry Level Applicant JOB TASK SIMULATION TEST ADMINISTRATION GUIDE

    ROWLETT, TEXAS FIRE RESCUE Entry Level Applicant JOB TASK SIMULATION TEST ADMINISTRATION GUIDE Stanard & Associates, Inc. June 2007 Revised June 2010 INTRODUCTION A content-oriented strategy was used to develop a valid job task simulation examination designed to measure the basic physical skills necessary for successful performance as a Rowlett Fire Rescue firefighter. The entire examination is composed of job-related physical skills. Only those skills that do not require training to become proficient are assessed. This means the exam is equally valid for assessing the physical skills of individuals who have had fire experience and those who have not. The test sequence outlined herein is used by Rowlett Fire Rescue for entry-level selection. A meeting with subject matter experts at Rowlett Fire Rescue, along with an analysis of data collected from current Rowlett firefighting personnel on a comprehensive fire services job analysis questionnaire provided the background knowledge necessary to develop this job-related physical ability examination. Recommended modifications were made June 2010. Recommendations were made by the JTS committee, a panel of Firefighters, Drivers and Officers of Rowlett Fire Rescue. This manual includes all specifications and instructions necessary to administer the job task simulation to entry-level applicants. It begins with a list of what test takers must wear and all materials necessary to conduct the test. Then, the duties of the lead administrator and proctors are detailed. Next, testing assumptions are listed. The timed sequence of events is described and each component is briefly discussed. The untimed event is also described and administration instructions are provided. Important course measurements are then provided.
  • Ladders – Issue Eight

    Ladders – Issue Eight

    LADDERS The recruit newsletter of the South Euclid Fire Department Climbing to a career as a firefighter in the South Euclid Fire Department, one rung at a time. Issue Eight Your Resume Is your resume ready to go? Have you ever written a resume? In this issue we will discuss resumes, first working on items to put in the resume and then how to prepare the resume. A proper and well written resume will not help you advance your career unless it contains the experience and training employers are looking for. These qualifications can be worked on while you pursue your dream job. The focus must be on what makes you an exceptional candidate. You should work on your basic training first, fire school and medic school. Experience is very valuable, even if it is part time, volunteer or in a field related to firefighting. Even your non-fire education can be an asset. Degrees in fire related fields are preferred but even degrees in non-fire related fields show your strength in education. There are numerous opportunities for you to add to your resume. Consider on-line classes that are low cost or free. Work on other certifications such as fire inspector, instructor or arson investigation. All of these relevant items on your resume demonstrate your training, skills and passion for the job. Other items such as involvement in community organizations help the potential employer see that you care about the community. The actual resume is not hard to write. The internet is full of help and examples. Resumes should be easy to read, and contain only relevant information.
  • Engine Riding Positions Officer Heo Nozzle Ff

    Engine Riding Positions Officer Heo Nozzle Ff

    MILWAUKEE FIRE DEPARTMENT Operational Guidelines Approved by: Chief Mark Rohlfing 2012 FORWARD The purpose of these operational guidelines is to make clear expectations for company performance, safety, and efficiency, eliminating the potential for confusion and duplication of effort at the emergency scene. It is understood that extraordinary situations may dictate a deviation from these guidelines. Deviation can only be authorized by the officer/acting officer of an apparatus or the incident commander. Any deviation must be communicated over the incident talk group. The following guidelines are meant to clarify best operational practices for the MFD. They are not intended to be all-inclusive and are designed to be updated as necessary. They are guidelines for you to use. However, there will be no compromise on issues of safety, chain of command, correct gear usage, or turnout times (per NFPA 1710). These operating guidelines will outline tool and task responsibilities for the specific riding positions on responding units. While the title of each riding position and the assignments that follow may not always seem to be a perfect pairing, the tactical advantage of knowing where each member is supposed to be operating at a given assignment will provide for increased accountability and increased effectiveness while performing our response duties. Within the guidelines, you will see run-type specific (and in some cases, arrival order specific) tool and task assignments. On those responses listing a ‘T (or R)’ as the response unit, the Company will be uniformly listed as ‘Truck’ for continuity. The riding positions are as follows: ENGINE RIDING POSITIONS OFFICER HEO NOZZLE FF BACKUP FF TRUCK RIDING POSITIONS OFFICER HEO VENT FF FORCE FF SAFETY If you see something that you believe impacts our safety, it is your duty to report it to your superior Officer immediately.
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______

    Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______

    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
  • Staying Green and Growing Jobs: Green Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance As Career Pathway Stepping Stones

    Staying Green and Growing Jobs: Green Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance As Career Pathway Stepping Stones

    STAYING GREEN AND GROWING JOBS: Green Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance as Career Pathway Stepping Stones in partnership with © Green For All April 2013 Written by Alvaro Sanchez Sanchez, Andrea Quinn, and Jeremy Hays. Produced in partnership with American Rivers Green For All thanks the Rockefeller Foundation for their support for the production of this report. Green For All and American Rivers would like to thank Alex Paxton, Gregory Michel, Geri Unger, Cathie Anderson, Annette Williams, Lou Etgen, Marcus Castain, Ross Gordon, Brendan McEwen, Alyssa Kocksis, Ricardo Moreno, Peter Ensign, Matt Burlin, Tracy Tackett, Sheryl Shapiro, Charlotte Katzenmoyer, Jeff McNesby, Erika Symmonds, Lisbeth Shepherd, Kevin Shafer, Peter Coffaro, Anna Swanberg, and Alisa Valderrama. We would also like to thank Green For All’s staff members Michael Katz, Kaori Tsukada, Kristina Johnson, and American Rivers’ staff Stacey Detwiler for their contributions to this report. About American Rivers: American Rivers is the leading organization working to protect and restore the nation’s rivers and streams. Rivers connect us to each other, nature, and future gen- erations. Since 1973, American Rivers has fought to preserve these connections, helping pro- tect and restore more than 150,000 miles of rivers through advocacy efforts, on-the-ground projects, and the annual release of America’s Most Endangered Rivers™. Headquartered in Washington, DC, American Rivers has offices across the country, and it has more than 100,000 supporters, members, and volunteers nationwide. For more information about American Rivers, visit our website at www.americanrivers.org About Green for All: Green For All is a national organization working to build an inclusive green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty.