Health Walks Area Order JUL AUG SEPT OCT.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
This PDF File of Your Paper in the Later Iron Age Belongs to the Publishers Oxbow Books and Is Their Copyright
This PDF file of your paper in The Later Iron Age belongs to the publishers Oxbow Books and is their copyright. As author you are licenced to make up to 50 offprints from it, but beyond that you may not publish it on the World Wide Web or in any other form. THE LATER IRON AGE IN BRITAIN AND BEYOND edited by Colin Haselgrove and Tom Moore Oxbow Books Published by Oxbow Books, Park End Place, Oxford OX1 1HN © Oxbow Books and the authors, 2007 ISBN 978-1-84217-252-0 1-84217-252-0 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available direct from Oxbow Books, Park End Place, Oxford OX1 1HN (Phone: 01865-241249; Fax: 01865-794449) and The David Brown Books Company PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779, USA (Phone: 860-945-9329; Fax: 860-945-9468) or from our website www.oxbowbooks.com Cover by Christina Unwin based on an idea by Rachel Pope; reconstruction of burial by Simon James Printed in Great Britain at Short Run Press, Exeter Contents 1. New narratives of the Later Iron Age 1 Colin Haselgrove and Tom Moore 2. The dynamics of social change in Later Iron Age eastern and south-eastern England 16 c. 300 BC–AD 43. J. D. Hill 3. Life on the edge? Exchange, community, and identity in the Later Iron Age 41 of the Severn–Cotswolds Tom Moore 4. Central places or special places? The origins and development of ‘oppida’ in Hertfordshire 62 Stewart Bryant 5. Cultural choices in the ‘British Eastern Channel Area’ in the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age 81 Sue Hamilton 6. -
Baptism Data Available
Suffolk Baptisms - July 2014 Data Available Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping From To Acton, All Saints Sudbury 1754 1900 Akenham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1903 Aldeburgh, St Peter & St Paul Orford 1813 1904 Alderton, St Andrew Wilford 1754 1902 Aldham, St Mary Sudbury 1754 1902 Aldringham cum Thorpe, St Andrew Dunwich 1813 1900 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul Sudbury 1754 1901 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul (BTs) Sudbury 1780 1792 Ampton, St Peter Thedwastre 1754 1903 Ashbocking, All Saints Bosmere 1754 1900 Ashby, St Mary Lothingland 1813 1900 Ashfield cum Thorpe, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Great Ashfield, All Saints Blackbourn 1765 1901 Aspall, St Mary of Grace Hartismere 1754 1900 Assington, St Edmund Sudbury 1754 1900 Athelington, St Peter Hoxne 1754 1904 Bacton, St Mary Hartismere 1754 1901 Badingham, St John the Baptist Hoxne 1813 1900 Badley, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1902 Badwell Ash, St Mary Blackbourn 1754 1900 Bardwell, St Peter & St Paul Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Barking, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1900 Barnardiston, All Saints Clare 1754 1899 Barnham, St Gregory Blackbourn 1754 1812 Barningham, St Andrew Blackbourn 1754 1901 Barrow, All Saints Thingoe 1754 1900 Barsham, Holy Trinity Wangford 1813 1900 Great Barton, Holy Innocents Thedwastre 1754 1901 Barton Mills, St Mary Fordham 1754 1812 Battisford, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1899 Bawdsey, St Mary the Virgin Wilford 1754 1902 Baylham, St Peter Bosmere 1754 1900 09 July 2014 Copyright © Suffolk Family History Society 2014 Page 1 of 12 Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping -
Steering Group Meeting MINUTES
Broadland Catchment Partnership - Steering Group Meeting MINUTES Tuesday 19th September 2017 (10am – 12.30pm) Fen Barn, Lound Lakes, Hall Road, Lound, NR31 9AU Attendees: Andrea Kelly (chair), Barry Bendall, Robert Camps, Richard Cooper, Lottie Faulkner, Carl Herrington, Rob Holland, Simon Hooton, Matt Jones, Karen Kramer-Wilson, Emily Long, Richard Mason, Amy Prendergast, Neil Punchard, Grace Roughton, Rory Sanderson, Ian Skinner, Heidi Smith, Rob Wise, Lottie Carlton (minutes). Apologies: Katy Anderson, David Diggens, John Hiskett, Keith Lead, Richard Reynolds, Ian Robinson, Paul Sorrell, Sarah Taigel, Robin Twigge Action items Actions 1. Welcome, introductions, apologies None Attendees were welcomed to the Suffolk Wildlife Trust’s Lound Reserve and introductions were made. Apologies as above. 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 20th June 2017 Minutes: ‘Accruals’ to be removed from section of minutes (action). LC Change to agenda: Item 5 - Paul Sorrell no longer able to attend. Mud on Road presentation replaced by River Tiffey weir removal project. 3. Natural Flood Management and Water Environment Improvement Fund Following a sift of local project proposal ideas EA had submitted four Natural Flood Management project proposals to Defra from the Broadland catchment area. Unfortunately none were selected nationally, but the Buxton project will go ahead using local area funding instead. Ongoing discussions with RFCC are looking at potential local levy funding for the remaining three. Defra is developing a national Water Environment Grant funding scheme that may be administered via Catchment Partnerships. Potential partner projects were requested by the National CaBA group. These were collated by the BCP Officer and submitted at the end of August 2017. -
Excursions 1997. Report and Notes on Some Findings. 19
EXCURSIONS1997 Reportand noteson somefindings 19 April. Philip Aitkens Ixworth, Garboldishamand North Lopham The towers of these three churches are believed to have been built by the 15th-century workshopof master masons,Aldrichof North Lopham, Norfolk. Acontract wasdrawn up in 1486between the churchwardens of Helmingham and Thomas Aldrich of North Lopham to construct their tower; today, it has a fine inscription at the base. North Lopham tower is believed,from evidencein wills,to have been commencedin 1479;an inscriptionby the same hand as that at Helminghamappears at mid-heighton the north side,but at the base isa band ofstone devices,flushwork-filled.Inscriptionsdated c.1480-1500are alsofound, for example, at Brockley(on the tower),Botesdale(over the north door) and Garboldisham(north porch), all by the same hand. Similardevicesin flushworkare to be found on many other churches c. 1460-80,especiallyat the basesof towers:those at Ixworth, BadwellAshand Elmswellform a notable group. SeealsoGarboldisham,Northwold,Fincham,NewBuckenham,Kenninghall and Mendlesharn. Other architectural features closelymatch, clear evidence of a common designer. These are mostlydatable by willsto c.1460-80. It is believedthat a new generation at the Aldrich workshop commences c. 1486, favouring inscriptions instead of flushwork devices. Acontract wasmade withThomas Aldrichto rebuild the east wallofThetford Priory, 1505-07. lxworth, St Mary'sChurch. The annual general meeting washeld here by kind permissionof the Revd P. Oliver. The tower was begun c. 1472, as evidenced by the 'Thomas Vyal' tile, commemorating the bequest of six marks by a prosperous localcarpenter in Decemberthat year,for workon the new`stepyr,and twotilesinscribedwiththe name ofWilliamDensy,Prior of the Augustinianhouse at Ixworth, 1467-84,one of them alsodated 1472. -
Babergh District Council
Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Babergh District Council Consultation response from Babergh District Council Babergh District Council (BDC) considered the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft proposals for the warding arrangements in the Babergh District at its meeting on 21 November 2017, and made the following comments and observations: South Eastern Parishes Brantham & Holbrook – It was suggested that Stutton & Holbrook should be joined to form a single member ward and that Brantham & Tattingstone form a second single member ward. This would result in electorates of 2104 and 2661 respectively. It is acknowledged the Brantham & Tattingstone pairing is slightly over the 10% variation threshold from the average electorate however this proposal represents better community linkages. Capel St Mary and East Bergholt – There was general support for single member wards for these areas. Chelmondiston – The Council was keen to ensure that the Boundary Commission uses the correct spelling of Chelmondiston (not Chelmondistan) in its future publications. There were comments from some Councillors that Bentley did not share common links with the other areas included in the proposed Chelmondiston Ward, however there did not appear to be an obvious alternative grouping for Bentley without significant alteration to the scheme for the whole of the South Eastern parishes. Copdock & Washbrook - It would be more appropriate for Great and Little Wenham to either be in a ward with Capel St Mary with which the villages share a vicar and the people go to for shops and doctors etc. Or alternatively with Raydon, Holton St Mary and the other villages in that ward as they border Raydon airfield and share issues concerning Notley Enterprise Park. -
Land at Ullswater Road, Campsea Ashe, Suffolk CAA
Land at Ullswater Road, Campsea Ashe, Suffolk CAA 032 Archaeological Post-excavation Assessment SCCAS Report No. 2013/131 Client: Flagship Housing Group Author: Mark Sommers December 2014 © Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service Land at Ullswater Road, Campsea Ashe, Suffolk Archaeological Post-Excavation Assessment SCCAS Report No. 2013/131 Author: Mark Sommers Contributions by: Stephen Benfield Illustrator: Crane Begg Editor: Dr Rhodri Gardner Report Date: December 2014 HER Information Report Number: 2013/131 Site Name: Land at Ullswater Road, Campsea Ashe, Suffolk Planning Application No: C/09/1862 Dates of Fieldwork: 18th July 2013 to 25th September 2013 Grid Reference: TM 3239 5552 Client/Funding Body: Flagship Housing Group Client Reference: n/a Curatorial Officer: Jude Plouviez Project Officer: Mark Sommers Oasis Reference: suffolkc1-154157 Site Code: CAA 032 Digital report submitted to Archaeological Data Service: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/library/greylit Disclaimer Any opinions expressed in this report about the need for further archaeological work are those of the Field Projects Team alone. Ultimately the need for further work will be determined by the Local Planning Authority and its Archaeological Advisors when a planning application is registered. Suffolk County Council’s archaeological contracting services cannot accept responsibility for inconvenience caused to the clients should the Planning Authority take a different view to that expressed in the report. Prepared By: Mark Sommers Date: December 2014 Approved By: Dr Rhodri Gardner Position: Contracts Manager Date: December 2014 Signed: Contents Summary Drawing Conventions 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Site location 1 1.2 The scope of this report 1 1.3 Circumstances and dates of fieldwork 3 2. -
Archaeology in Suffolk 2008 Edward Martin, Colin
61 ARCHAEOLOGYIN SUFFOLK2008 compledby EDWARDMARTIN,COLINPENDLETONandJUDITH PLOUVIEZ objectdrawingsbyDONNAWREATHALL THIS IS A selection of the new discoveries reported in 2008. Information on these has been incorporated into the county's Historic Environment Record (formerly Sites and Monuments Record), which is maintained by the Archaeological Service of Suffolk County Council at Bury St. Edmunds; where available the Record number is quoted at the beginning of each entry The Suffolk Historic Environment Record is now partially accessible online via the Heritage Gateway webs ite (www heritagegat eway.org.uk). A high proportion of the finds is now being recorded through the national Portable Antiquities Scheme, the Suffolk part of which is also based in the Archaeological Service of Suffolk County Council. Further details and images of many of the finds can be found on the Scheme's website (www.finds.org.uk) and for many of the finds listed here the PAS reference number is included in the text. During 2008 the PAS finds in Suffolk were recorded by Andrew Brown, Faye Minter and Jane Carr. Following requests from metal detector users, we have removed all grid references from entries concerning finds reported by them. We continue to be grateful to all those who contribute information for this annual list. Abbreviations: IDDC Ipswich and District Detector Club MDDC Mildenhall and District Detector Club Mdf Metal detector find NMS Norfolk Museums Service PAS Portable Antiquities Scheme (see above). The Suffolk contact for this national scheme is Faye Minter (tel. 01284 352449; e-mail [email protected]) SCCAS Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service, Shire Hall, Bury St Edmunds IP33 2AR (tel. -
Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan
Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan 2014 to 2036 Submission Version July 2021 Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan Index 1. Introduction page 2 2. Map of Neighbourhood Plan Area page 3 3. Profile of the Parishes page 4 4. Our Vision for 2036 page 6 5. Objectives of Neighbourhood Plan page 6 6. Policies included in this Neighbourhood Plan page 8 7. Housing page 8 8. Environment page 17 9. Community Facilities page 21 10. Business and Employment page 27 11. Health page 28 Appendix 1 Lound and Somerleyton, Suffolk, Masterplanning and Design Guidelines, AECOM, June 2019 1 Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan 1. Introduction 1.1 Lound and Ashby, Herringfleet & Somerleyton are adjoining parishes in the north of Suffolk. The area is rural, with much of the land being used for agriculture. The main settlement areas are the villages of Somerleyton and Lound, with smaller settlements at Herringfleet and Ashby, together with some scattered farmhouses and converted farm buildings or farm workers’ cottages. The two parishes have a combined area of around 2020 hectares, and a total population of around 780 (2011 census). 1.2 Early in 2016 the two parish councils agreed to work together to develop a joint neighbourhood plan. A steering group consisting of residents and Parish Councillors was set up to lead the work. 1.3 One of the initial pieces of work was to agree and gain acceptance from the former Waveney District Council (now East Suffolk Council) and the Broads Authority for the designated Neighbourhood Area. -
Revised Appendix C , Item 32. PDF 402 KB
PAPER BC/17/29 – REVISED APPENDIX C Appendix C Budget, Funding and Council Tax Requirements 1. The precept requirements of Parish / Town Councils must be aggregated with the requirement of this authority to arrive at an average Council Tax figure for the district / parish purposes. This figure however is totally hypothetical and will not be paid by any taxpayer (other than by coincidence). A schedule of the precept requirements from Parish / Town Councils will be reported to Council on 20 February. 2. The County and the Police and Crime Commissioner’s precept requirements are added to this. 3. The legally required calculation is set out below: 1) The General Fund Budget requirement for the District Council purposes in 2018/19 will be £158.86, based on an increase to Council Tax of 10p per week for a Band D property which is the equivalent to 3.25%. 2) The County Council precept requirement is still to be determined, but is likely to be £1,242.54 for a Band D property in 2018/19, an increase of 4.99%. 3) The Police and Crime Commissioner’s precept requirement is likely to increase by £12 or 6.8% to £188.82. 4) At the time of preparing this report, not all Parish / Town Councils have supplied formal notification of their 2018/19 precept. The final figures will be reported to Council. 4. Babergh is a billing authority and collects council tax and non-domestic rates on behalf of the other precepting authorities i.e. Suffolk County Council, Suffolk Police and Crime Commissioner and Parish / Town Councils. -
Conservation Area Appraisal © Crown Copyright All Rights Reserved Mid Suffolk D C Licence No 100017810 2006 Introduction
conservation area appraisal © Crown copyright All rights reserved Mid Suffolk D C Licence no 100017810 2006 Introduction The conservation area in Wattisfield was originally designated by West Suffolk County Council in 1973, and inherited by Mid Suffolk District Council at its inception in 1974. The Council has a duty to review its conservation area designations from time to time, and this appraisal examines Wattisfield under a number of different headings as set out in English Heritage’s new ‘Guidance on Conservation Area Appraisals’ (2006). As such it is a straightforward appraisal of Wattisfield’s built environment in conservation terms. This document is neither prescriptive nor overly descriptive, but more a demonstration of ‘quality of place’, sufficient for the briefing of the Planning Officer when assessing proposed works in the area. The photographs and maps are thus intended to contribute as much as the text itself. As the English Heritage guidelines point out, the appraisal is to be read as a general overview, rather than as a comprehensive listing, and the omission of any particular building, feature or space does not imply that it is of no interest in conservation terms. Text, photographs and map overlays by Patrick Taylor, Conservation Architect, Mid Suffolk District Council 2008. © Crown copyright All rights reserved Mid Suffolk D C Licence no 100017810 2006 Topographical Framework The village of Wattisfield lies midway between Bury St Edmunds and Diss on the north-western edge of Mid Suffolk District. About two miles west of Rickinghall it adjoins a shallow branched valley of a tributary of the Little Ouse that flows north-westwards to the Wash via the Norfolk border. -
Biodiversity Distribution
Waveney Open Space Needs Assessment | July 2015 Biodiversity Distribution Biodiversity refers to all of the natural world and all living organisms within it including plants, animals, bacteria and micro organisms. www.waveney.gov.uk/planningpolicy 19 Waveney Open Space Needs Assessment | July 2015 | Biodiversity Distribution www.waveney.gov.uk/planningpolicy 20 Waveney Open Space Needs Assessment | July 2015 | Biodiversity Distribution What is biodiversity? Biodiversity refers to all of the natural world and all living organisms within it, including plants, animals, bacteria and micro organisms. The convention on biodiversity defines it as: “The variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems, and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems” (Source: Natural England website). Introduction to the biodiversity distribution assessment Waveney District has a wide range of wildlife and habitats, including coastline, parkland, arable fields, rivers, hedges and woodlands. Many of these are extremely valuable in their own right and require protection and enhancement. These sites often also form part of a wider network of sites and wildlife corridors that increase the range of habitats that can support local wildlife. Networks of biologically valuable sites often have greater value than each of the sites individually. For this reason Waveney District Council wants to map ecological sites and networks to better understand how they can function alongside other types of green infrastructure. The Waveney District Council Biodiversity Audit was completed in 2007 by Suffolk Wildlife Trust. This biodiversity audit included officially designated sites, county wildlife sites and other sites that were considered to have ecological value. -
Heritage and Settlement Sensitivity Assessment for Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils
Heritage and Settlement Sensitivity Assessment for Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils Date: March 2018 Page 2 Heritage and Settlement Sensitivity Assessment for Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils Name Signed Date Author Richard Broadhead Richard Broadhead 30-1-18, 6-3-18 Checker Richard Havis 7-3-18 Approver Tim Murphy 8-3-18 For further information Please contact: Tim Murphy Historic & Built Environment Manager Place Services Essex County Council County Hall Chelmsford Essex CM11QH www.placeservices.co.uk [email protected] 0333 032 0847 Copyright This report may contain material that is non-Place Services copyright (e.g. Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, English Heritage), or the intellectual property of third parties, which Place Services is able to provide for limited reproduction under the terms of our own copyright licences or permissions, but for which copyright itself is not transferable by Place Services. Users of this report remain bound by the conditions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 with regard to multiple copying and electronic dissemination of the report. Disclaimer The material contained in this report was designed as an integral part of a report to an individual client and was prepared solely for the benefit of that client. The material contained in this report does not necessarily stand on its own and is not intended to nor should it be relied upon by a third party. To the fullest extent permitted by law Place Services will not be liable by reason of breach of contract, negligence, or otherwise for any loss or damage (whether direct, indirect or consequential) occasioned to any person acting or omitting to act or refraining from acting in reliance upon the material contained in the report.