Investigations Into the Role of Erbb4 in Mouse Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigations Into the Role of Erbb4 in Mouse Development Investigations into the role of ErbB4 in mouse development. Hester Tidcombe Supervisor: Martin Gassmann Submitted towards the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University College London. - 1 - ProQuest Number: U643888 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U643888 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Acknowledgements As countless people have said about many diverse undertakings, and more will no doubt say in the future: There are many people without whom this project would have been impossible. There are others without whom it would have been one heck of a lot easier... Many thanks to all the following, who all fall in the former category: John Atkinson, Amanda Barlow, Joe Brock, Jim Burt, Marion Caulfield, Elena Grigorieva, Ian Harragan, Frank Johnson, Stuart Law, Lesley McNeill, Kristine Cronhelm, Rod King, Tim Mohun, Dipa Natarajan, Randa Pember, Justin Peter, Melvyn Sherwood, Derek Stemple, Masa Tada, Paula Towers, Vicky Tsoni and Peter Woodhams. Particular thanks must go to Robb Krumlauf, my second supervisor, for his feedback. Also to Anita Mynett and Monica Dixon for their suggestions, help, and invaluable moral support, and to Monica for her meticulous proofreading. To Jon Golding, current acting supervisor, for endless patience and advice on both experiments and this thesis. And thanks to my primary supervisor, Martin Gassmann, for all his guidance and support over the last four years. Special thanks must go to David Franklin for everything, including financial support for the last year, providing dinner after late nights in the lab, and his unending encouragement and support. I promise never to embark on a PhD ever again! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................2 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Receptor ty r o sine k in a s e s ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 E r b B receptors a n d neuregulins ......................................................................................................................8 1.2.1 ErbB receptors ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Overview o f EGFR and the ErbB receptors .................................................................................................................................8 1.3 N e u r e g u l in s .................................................................................................................................................................13 1.3.1 Neuregulin-1 splice variants.................................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.2 Neuregplin structure.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3.3 Other neuregulin-like proteins............................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.4 E r b B a n d n eu r eg u lin m u t a n t s ........................................................................................................................ 19 1.5 The H in d b r a in .............................................................................................................................................................19 1.6 The H ea rt a n d E r b B receptors a n d l ig a n d s ........................................................................................... 27 1.6.1 Heart trabeculation............................................................................................................................................................................................27 1.6.2 ErbB4 and the heart.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 1.6.3 ErbB3 and the heart.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 1.7 Ph eno ty pes of Er b B 2, Er b B3 a n d N RG k n o c k o u t s ............................................................................. 30 1.7.1 ErbB4 knockout neural phenotype..................................................................................................................................................... 34 1.8 Po ssible role of Er b B 4 in the h in d b r a in ....................................................................................................35 1.9 Re sc u e of the Er b B 4 -/- m o u s e ......................................................................................................................... 37 Figu re 1.1 Str uctu re of E r b B r e c e pt o r s ......................................................................................................... 39 Figu re 1.2 Str ucture of neuregulins ...................................................................................................................40 Figu re 1.3 L ig a n d b in d ing to Er b B r e c e pt o r s ................................................................................................ 41 Figu re 1.4 D ev elopm ent of the m o u se h in d b r a in ..........................................................................................42 Figure 1.5 Hypothetical E r b B 4 a ctiv ity m e c h a n ism .................................................................................43 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................................................44 2.1 An im a l s .......................................................................................................................................................................... 44 2.1.1 Acquisition o f embryos ................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 2.2 G en o t y pin g ...................................................................................................................................................................45 2.2.1 Tail biopsies .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 2.2.2 DNA isolation from tissue ...........................................................................................................................................................................45 2.3 PCR OF GENOMIC DNA ............................................................................................................................................. 46 2.3.1 ErbB4 alleles............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 46 2.4 Pla sm id su bclo n ing a n d transformation ................................................................................................ 49 2.4.1 HER4 plasmid......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 2.4.2 Isolation of cH4M2 plasmid ......................................................................................................................................................................51 2.4.3 Concentration and purity o f DNA...................................................................................................................................................... 51 2.4.4 Sequencing o f DNA........................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 2.4.5 Other plasmids ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Increased Expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Betacellulin During the Early Stage of Gastric Ulcer Healing
    505-510 11/6/08 12:55 Page 505 MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 1: 505-510, 2008 505 Increased expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and betacellulin during the early stage of gastric ulcer healing GEUN HAE CHOI, HO SUNG PARK, KYUNG RYOUL KIM, HA NA CHOI, KYU YUN JANG, MYOUNG JA CHUNG, MYOUNG JAE KANG, DONG GEUN LEE and WOO SUNG MOON Department of Pathology, Institute for Medical Sciences, Chonbuk National University Medical School and the Center for Healthcare Technology Development, Jeonju, Korea Received January 2, 2008; Accepted February 22, 2008 Abstract. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is from tissue necrosis triggered by mucosal ischemia, free important for the proliferation and differentiation of gastric radical formation and the cessation of nutrient delivery, which mucosal cells. Betacellulin (BTC) is a novel ligand for EGFR are caused by vascular and microvascular injury such as Since their role is unclear in the ulcer healing process, we thrombi, constriction or other occlusions (2). Tissue necrosis investigated their expression. Gastric ulcers in 30 Sprague- and the release of leukotriene B attract leukocytes and Dawley rats were induced by acetic acid. RT-PCR and macrophages, which release pro-inflammatory cytokines Western blotting were performed to detect EGFR and BTC. (e.g. TNFα, IL-1α, and IL-1ß). These in turn activate local Immunohistochemical studies were performed to detect fibroblasts, endothelial and epithelial cells. Histologically, an EGFR, BTC and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). ulcer has two characteristic structures: a distinct ulcer margin The expression of EGFR and the BTC gene was significantly formed by the adjacent non-necrotic mucosa, and granulation increased at 12 h, 24 h and 3 days after ulcer induction tissue composed of fibroblasts, macrophages and proliferating (P<0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Recombinant Human Betacellulin Promotes the Neogenesis of -Cells
    Recombinant Human Betacellulin Promotes the Neogenesis of ␤-Cells and Ameliorates Glucose Intolerance in Mice With Diabetes Induced by Selective Alloxan Perfusion Koji Yamamoto, Jun-ichiro Miyagawa, Masako Waguri, Reiko Sasada, Koichi Igarashi, Ming Li, Takao Nammo, Makoto Moriwaki, Akihisa Imagawa, Kazuya Yamagata, Hiromu Nakajima, Mitsuyoshi Namba, Yoshihiro Tochino, Toshiaki Hanafusa, and Yuji Matsuzawa Betacellulin (BTC), a member of the epidermal growth factor family, is expressed predominantly in the human pancreas and induces the differentiation of a pancreatic ancreatic ␤-cells are thought to be terminally dif- acinar cell line (AR42J) into insulin-secreting cells, ferentiated cells with little ability to regenerate. suggesting that BTC has a physiologically important However, proliferation of preexisting ␤-cells and role in the endocrine pancreas. In this study, we exam- differentiation of ␤-cells from precursor cells, ined the in vivo effect of recombinant human BTC P (rhBTC) on glucose intolerance and pancreatic mor- mainly residing in the pancreatic duct lining, have been phology using a new mouse model with glucose intoler- demonstrated in some animal models (1–5). Recently, we ance induced by selective alloxan perfusion. RhBTC developed a new mouse model of diabetes induced by selec- (1 µg/g body wt) or saline was injected subcutaneously tive perfusion of alloxan (100 µg/g body wt) during the every day from the day after alloxan treatment. The clamping of the superior mesenteric artery (1). In this model, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test revealed no dif- glucose intolerance spontaneously resolves after one year ference between rhBTC-treated and rhBTC-untreated because of the proliferation of surviving ␤-cells in the non- glucose-intolerant mice at 2–4 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Signalling Between Microvascular Endothelium and Cardiomyocytes Through Neuregulin Downloaded From
    Cardiovascular Research (2014) 102, 194–204 SPOTLIGHT REVIEW doi:10.1093/cvr/cvu021 Signalling between microvascular endothelium and cardiomyocytes through neuregulin Downloaded from Emily M. Parodi and Bernhard Kuhn* Harvard Medical School, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Enders Building, Room 1212, Brookline, MA 02115, USA Received 21 October 2013; revised 23 December 2013; accepted 10 January 2014; online publish-ahead-of-print 29 January 2014 http://cardiovascres.oxfordjournals.org/ Heterocellular communication in the heart is an important mechanism for matching circulatory demands with cardiac structure and function, and neuregulins (Nrgs) play an important role in transducing this signal between the hearts’ vasculature and musculature. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding Nrgs, explaining their roles in transducing signals between the heart’s microvasculature and cardiomyocytes. We highlight intriguing areas being investigated for developing new, Nrg-mediated strategies to heal the heart in acquired and congenital heart diseases, and note avenues for future research. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords Neuregulin Heart Heterocellular communication ErbB -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------† † † This article is part of the Spotlight Issue on: Heterocellular signalling
    [Show full text]
  • The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Family As a Central Element for Cellular Signal Transduction and Diversification
    Endocrine-Related Cancer (2001) 8 11–31 The epidermal growth factor receptor family as a central element for cellular signal transduction and diversification N Prenzel, O M Fischer, S Streit, S Hart and A Ullrich Max-Planck Institut fu¨r Biochemie, Department of Molecular Biology, Am Klopferspitz 18A, 82152 Martinsried, Germany (Requests for offprints should be addressed to A Ullrich; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Homeostasis of multicellular organisms is critically dependent on the correct interpretation of the plethora of signals which cells are exposed to during their lifespan. Various soluble factors regulate the activation state of cellular receptors which are coupled to a complex signal transduction network that ultimately generates signals defining the required biological response. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family of receptor tyrosine kinases represents both key regulators of normal cellular development as well as critical players in a variety of pathophysiological phenomena. The aim of this review is to give a broad overview of signal transduction networks that are controlled by the EGFR superfamily of receptors in health and disease and its application for target-selective therapeutic intervention. Since the EGFR and HER2 were recently identified as critical players in the transduction of signals by a variety of cell surface receptors, such as G-protein-coupled receptors and integrins, our special focus is the mechanisms and significance of the interconnectivity between heterologous signalling systems. Endocrine-Related Cancer (2001) 8 11–31 Introduction autophosphorylation of cytoplasmic tyrosine residues (reviewed in Ullrich & Schlessinger 1990, Heldin 1995, Cell surface receptors integrate a multitude of extracellular Alroy & Yarden 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Serum Protein Fingerprinting by PEA Immunoassay Coupled with a Pattern-Recognition Algorithms Distinguishes MGUS and Multiple Myeloma
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 41), pp: 69408-69421 Research Paper Serum protein fingerprinting by PEA immunoassay coupled with a pattern-recognition algorithms distinguishes MGUS and multiple myeloma Petra Schneiderova1,*, Tomas Pika2,*, Petr Gajdos3, Regina Fillerova1, Pavel Kromer3, Milos Kudelka3, Jiri Minarik2, Tomas Papajik2, Vlastimil Scudla2 and Eva Kriegova1 1Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic 2Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic 3Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic *These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Eva Kriegova, email: [email protected] Keywords: serum pattern, cytokines, growth factors, proximity extension immunoassay, post-transplant serum pattern Received: May 04, 2016 Accepted: July 28, 2016 Published: August 12, 2016 Copyright: Schneiderova et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Serum protein fingerprints associated with MGUS and MM and their changes in MM after autologous stem cell transplantation (MM-ASCT, day 100) remain unexplored. Using highly-sensitive Proximity Extension ImmunoAssay on 92 cancer biomarkers (Proseek Multiplex, Olink), enhanced serum levels of Adrenomedullin (ADM, Pcorr= .0004), Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15, Pcorr= .003), and soluble Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (sMICA, Pcorr= .023), all prosurvival and chemoprotective factors for myeloma cells, were detected in MM comparing to MGUS.
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement of CRH Receptors in the Neuroprotective Action of R-Apomorphine in the Striatal 6-OHDA Rat Model
    Neuroscience & Medicine, 2013, 4, 299-318 299 Published Online December 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/nm) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/nm.2013.44044 Involvement of CRH Receptors in the Neuroprotective Action of R-Apomorphine in the Striatal 6-OHDA Rat Model Mustafa Varçin1, Eduard Bentea1, Steven Roosens1, Yvette Michotte1, Sophie Sarre1,2* 1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Drug Analysis, Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Brussels, Belgium; 2Belgian Pharmacists Association, Medicines Control Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium. Email: *[email protected] Received October 21st, 2013; revised November 20th, 2013; accepted December 10th, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Mustafa Varçin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT The dopamine D1-D2 receptor agonist, R-apomorphine, has been shown to be neuroprotective in different models of Parkinson’s disease. Different mechanisms of action for this effect have been proposed, but not verified in the striatal 6-hydroxydopamine rat model. In this study, the expression of a set of genes involved in 1) signaling, 2) growth and differentiation, 3) neuronal regeneration and survival, 4) apoptosis and 5) inflammation in the striatum was measured after a subchronic R-apomorphine treatment (10 mg/kg/day, subcutaneously, during 11 days) in the striatal 6-hydroxy- dopamine rat model. The expression of 84 genes was analysed by using the rat neurotrophins and receptors RT2 Pro- filer™ PCR array. The neuroprotective effects of R-apomorphine in the striatal 6-hydroxydopamine model were con- firmed by neurochemical and behavioural analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Human B-Cell Proliferation and Intracellular Signaling: Part 3
    1872 Diabetes Volume 64, June 2015 Andrew F. Stewart,1 Mehboob A. Hussain,2 Adolfo García-Ocaña,1 Rupangi C. Vasavada,1 Anil Bhushan,3 Ernesto Bernal-Mizrachi,4 and Rohit N. Kulkarni5 Human b-Cell Proliferation and Intracellular Signaling: Part 3 Diabetes 2015;64:1872–1885 | DOI: 10.2337/db14-1843 This is the third in a series of Perspectives on intracel- signaling pathways in rodent and human b-cells, with lular signaling pathways coupled to proliferation in pan- a specific focus on the links between b-cell proliferation creatic b-cells. We contrast the large knowledge base in and intracellular signaling pathways (1,2). We highlight rodent b-cells with the more limited human database. what is known in rodent b-cells and compare and contrast With the increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes and that to the current knowledge base in human b-cells. In- the recognition that type 2 diabetes is also due in part variably, the human b-cell section is very brief compared fi b to a de ciency of functioning -cells, there is great ur- with the rodent counterpart, reflecting the still primitive gency to identify therapeutic approaches to expand hu- state of our understanding of mitogenic signaling in hu- b man -cell numbers. Therapeutic approaches might man b-cells. To emphasize this difference, each figure is include stem cell differentiation, transdifferentiation, or divided into two panels, one summarizing rodent b-cell expansion of cadaver islets or residual endogenous signaling and one for human b-cells. Our intended audi- b-cells. In these Perspectives, we focus on b-cell ence includes trainees in b-cell regeneration as well as proliferation.
    [Show full text]
  • HCC and Cancer Mutated Genes Summarized in the Literature Gene Symbol Gene Name References*
    HCC and cancer mutated genes summarized in the literature Gene symbol Gene name References* A2M Alpha-2-macroglobulin (4) ABL1 c-abl oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (4,5,22) ACBD7 Acyl-Coenzyme A binding domain containing 7 (23) ACTL6A Actin-like 6A (4,5) ACTL6B Actin-like 6B (4) ACVR1B Activin A receptor, type IB (21,22) ACVR2A Activin A receptor, type IIA (4,21) ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 (5) ADAMTS9 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 9 (4) ADCY2 Adenylate cyclase 2 (brain) (26) AJUBA Ajuba LIM protein (21) AKAP9 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein (yotiao) 9 (4) Akt AKT serine/threonine kinase (28) AKT1 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (5,21,22) AKT2 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 2 (4) ALB Albumin (4) ALK Anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (22) AMPH Amphiphysin (24) ANK3 Ankyrin 3, node of Ranvier (ankyrin G) (4) ANKRD12 Ankyrin repeat domain 12 (4) ANO1 Anoctamin 1, calcium activated chloride channel (4) APC Adenomatous polyposis coli (4,5,21,22,25,28) APOB Apolipoprotein B [including Ag(x) antigen] (4) AR Androgen receptor (5,21-23) ARAP1 ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 1 (4) ARHGAP35 Rho GTPase activating protein 35 (21) ARID1A AT rich interactive domain 1A (SWI-like) (4,5,21,22,24,25,27,28) ARID1B AT rich interactive domain 1B (SWI1-like) (4,5,22) ARID2 AT rich interactive domain 2 (ARID, RFX-like) (4,5,22,24,25,27,28) ARID4A AT rich interactive domain 4A (RBP1-like) (28) ARID5B AT rich interactive domain 5B (MRF1-like) (21) ASPM Asp (abnormal
    [Show full text]
  • NMDA Receptors Regulate Neuregulin 2 Binding to ER-PM Junctions and Ectodomain Release
    Molecular Neurobiology (2019) 56:8345–8363 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01659-w NMDA Receptors Regulate Neuregulin 2 Binding to ER-PM Junctions and Ectodomain Release Detlef Vullhorst1 & Andres Buonanno1 Received: 29 March 2019 /Accepted: 20 May 2019 /Published online: 25 June 2019 # This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019 Abstract Unprocessed pro-neuregulin 2 (pro-NRG2) accumulates on neuronal cell bodies at junctions between the endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane (ER-PM junctions). NMDA receptors (NMDARs) trigger NRG2 ectodomain shedding from these sites followed by activation of ErbB4 receptor tyrosine kinases, and ErbB4 signaling cell-autonomously downregulates intrinsic excitability of GABAergic interneurons by reducing voltage-gated sodium channel currents. NMDARs also promote dispersal of Kv2.1 clusters from ER-PM junctions and cause a hyperpolarizing shift in its voltage-dependent channel activation, suggesting that NRG2/ErbB4 and Kv2.1 work together to regulate intrinsic interneuron excitability in an activity-dependent manner. Here we explored the cellular processes underlying NMDAR-dependent NRG2 shedding in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. We report that NMDARs control shedding by two separate but converging mechanisms. First, NMDA treatment disrupts binding of pro-NRG2 to ER-PM junctions by post-translationally modifying conserved Ser/Thr residues in its intracellular domain. Second, using a mutant NRG2 protein that cannot be modified at these residues and that fails to accumulate at ER-PM junctions, we demonstrate that NMDARs also directly promote NRG2 shedding by ADAM-type metalloproteinases. Using pharmacological and shRNA-mediated knockdown, and metalloproteinase overexpression, we unexpectedly find that ADAM10, but not ADAM17/TACE, is the major NRG2 sheddase acting downstream of NMDAR activation.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Factor Administration for Nerve, Skeletal Muscle and Cardiac Tissue Repair: a Key Tool in Regenerative Medicine
    UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI TORINO PhD Programme in Experimental Medicine and Therapy XXVIII cycle GROWTH FACTOR ADMINISTRATION FOR NERVE, SKELETAL MUSCLE AND CARDIAC TISSUE REPAIR: A KEY TOOL IN REGENERATIVE MEDICINE Presented by: Michela Morano Tutor: Prof. Stefano Geuna PhD Coordinator: Prof. Giuseppe Saglio Scientific disciplinary sector: BIO 16 2012-2016 CONTENT ABSTRACT 5 OUTLINE 11 ABBREVIATIONS 15 CHAPTER 1 PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY AND REPAIR 17 Introduction and Scientific Background Aim of the Research Scientific Publications Discussion and Future Directions CHAPTER 2 SKELETAL MUSCLE DENERVATION 159 Introduction and Scientific Background Aim of the Research Scientific Publication Discussion and Future Directions CHAPTER 3 CARDIAC MUSCLE: ISCHEMIA/REPERFUSION INJURY 205 Introduction and Scientific Background Aim of the Research Scientific Publication Discussion and Future Directions GENERAL CONCLUSIONS 247 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 255 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The regenerative medicine is a continuously evolving interdisciplinary field aimed to enhance the regenerative capability of the body itself and to guide the regeneration process taking advantage of endogenous repair mechanisms to restore a tissue or organ morphology and function. Two types of approaches can be distinguished in regenerative medicine: cell based- and cell free- therapies. Particular attractive are growth factors-based therapies, which developed, thank to bioengineering and technical science influences, into a more integrated therapeutic approaches based on biomaterial,
    [Show full text]
  • Akt-Mediated Survival of Oligodendrocytes Induced by Neuregulins
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 2000, 20(20):7622–7630 Akt-Mediated Survival of Oligodendrocytes Induced by Neuregulins Ana I. Flores,1 Barbara S. Mallon,1 Takashi Matsui,2 Wataru Ogawa,3 Anthony Rosenzweig,2 Takashi Okamoto,1 and Wendy B. Macklin1 1Department of Neurosciences, The Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, 2Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02139, and 3Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0017, Japan Neuregulins have been implicated in a number of events in cells heregulin in glial cells, BAD was overexpressed in C6 glioma in the oligodendrocyte lineage, including enhanced survival, mi- cells. In these cells, heregulin induced phosphorylation of BAD at tosis, migration, and differentiation. At least two signaling path- Ser 136. Apoptosis of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells induced by ways have been shown to be involved in neuregulin signaling: the growth factor deprivation was effectively blocked by heregulin in phosphatidylinositol (PI)-3 kinase and the mitogen-activated pro- a wortmannin-sensitive manner. Overexpression of dominant tein kinase pathways. In the present studies, we examined the negative Akt but not of wild-type Akt by adenoviral gene transfer signaling pathway involved in the survival function of heregulin, in primary cultures of both oligodendrocytes and their progeni- focusing on heregulin-induced changes in Akt activity
    [Show full text]
  • CHBP Induces Stronger Immunosuppressive CD127+ M
    Li et al. Cell Death and Disease (2021) 12:177 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03448-7 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access CHBP induces stronger immunosuppressive CD127+ M-MDSC via erythropoietin receptor Jiawei Li1,2,GuoweiTu3, Weitao Zhang1,2,YiZhang2,4,XuepengZhang2,3,YueQiu2,3,JiyanWang2,5,TianleSun6, Tongyu Zhu1,2,7, Cheng Yang 1,2,8 and Ruiming Rong1,2,9 Abstract Erythropoietin (EPO) is not only an erythropoiesis hormone but also an immune-regulatory cytokine. The receptors of EPO (EPOR)2 and tissue-protective receptor (TPR), mediate EPO’s immune regulation. Our group firstly reported a non- erythropoietic peptide derivant of EPO, cyclic helix B peptide (CHBP), which could inhibit macrophages inflammation and dendritic cells (DCs) maturation. As a kind of innate immune regulatory cell, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) share a common myeloid progenitor with macrophages and DCs. In this study, we investigated the effects on MDSCs differentiation and immunosuppressive function via CHBP induction. CHBP promoted MDSCs differentiate toward M-MDSCs with enhanced immunosuppressive capability. Infusion of CHBP-induced M-MDSCs significantly prolonged murine skin allograft survival compared to its counterpart without CHBP stimulation. In addition, we found CHBP increased the proportion of CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh CD127+ M-MDSCs, which exerted a stronger immunosuppressive function compared to CD11b+Ly6G−Ly6Chigh CD127− M-MDSCs. In CHBP induced M-MDSCs, we found that EPOR downstream signal proteins Jak2 and STAT3 were upregulated, which had a strong relationship with MDSC function. In addition, CHBP upregulated GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA-3) protein translation level, which was an upstream signal of CD127 and regulator of STAT3.
    [Show full text]