!!!Obamapluralismspectacle: Barack Obama, the Power Elite and Media Spectacle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

!!!Obamapluralismspectacle: Barack Obama, the Power Elite and Media Spectacle 【특집】 !!!ObamaPluralismSpectacle: Barack Obama, the Power Elite and Media Spectacle Douglas Kellner (University of California, Los Angeles) Power elite theory played a significant role in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s among certain sectors of the academic establishment, and among some individuals who would come to constitute the New Left. C. Wright Mills, for instance, in The Power Elite argued that Big Business, Big Government, Big Labor and a growing military- industrial complex were coming to dominate American society and politics.1) Mills was also one of the first to see that emergent mass media were coming to be a powerful force that served the interests of dominant elites. In White Collar, Mills stressed the crucial role of the mass media in shaping individual behavior and in inducing conformity to middle class values. He argued that the media are increasingly shaping individual aspirations and behavior and are above all promoting values of “individual success.” He also believed that entertainment media were especially potent instruments of social control because 1) C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite (Boston: Beacon Press, 1956). 26 Douglas Kellner “popular culture is not tagged as ‘propaganda’ but as entertainment; people are often exposed to it when most relaxed of mind and tired of body; and its characters offer easy targets of identification, easy answers to stereotyped personal problems.”2) Mills analyzed the banalization of politics in the media, by which means “the mass media plug for ruling political symbols and personalities .”3) Perceiving the parallel between marketing commodities and selling politicians, Mills analyzed tendencies toward the commodification of politics, and, in The Power Elite, he focused on the manipulative role of media in shaping public opinion and strengthening the power of the dominant elites. In an analysis that anticipated Habermas’ theory in Structural Changes in the Public Sphere, Mills discusses the shift from a social order consisting of “communities, of publics,” in which individuals participated in political and social debate and action, to a “mass society” characterized by the “transformation of public into mass.”4) The impact of the mass media is crucial in this “great transformation” for it shifts “the ratio of givers of opinion to the receivers” in favor of small groups of elites, who control or have access to the mass media.5) Moreover, the mass media engage in one-way communication that does not allow feedback, thus obliterating another feature of a democratic public sphere. In addition, the media rarely encourage participation in public action. In these ways, the mass media foster social passivity and the fragmentation of the public sphere into privatized consumers. The rise of media power in the succeeding decades followed the 2) C. Wright Mills, White Collar (Boston: Beacon Press, 1951), 336. 3) Ibid., 338. 4) Mills, The Power Elite, 298ff. 5) Ibid. !!!ObamaPluralismSpectacle: Barack Obama, the Power Elite and Media Spectacle 27 logic of Mills’ power elite arguments. Successful Presidential candidates in the U.S. had the backing of one of the two major Big Government parties, the Democrats and Republicans, and tended to carry out polices that would serve the interests of corporate elites, the military-industrial complex, the two major political parties, and Big Government. In the next section, I will argue that the presidency of the Bush-Cheney administration (2000-2008) followed the logic of power elite theory, but that the victory in the 2008 presidential election by Barack Obama points to a new political logic governed by the rise of media spectacle and a pluralization of U.S. politics. From the Bush-Cheney Administration to the Obama Era The Bush-Cheney administration carried out an agenda serving the interests of big corporations, the military-industrial complex, and the rightwing of the Republican Party during its eight years in office.6) Many major figures in the administration came out of the corporate sector, especially the oil and energy industries, and many came from the conservative wing of the Republican Party that served the military-industrial complex. Within its first days in office, the Bush- Cheney administration began the process of undoing the socially liberal regulatory politics previously enacted by the Clinton administration. Although its ambitious rightwing agenda was initially stalled, following 6) I refer to the Bush-Cheney administration rather than to the George W. Bush administration because of the immense role played by Dick Cheney. For my analysis of the Bush-Cheney administration that documents the claims made in this section, see Kellner, Grand Theft 2000 (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001); Kellner, From September 11 to Terror War: The Dangers of the Bush Legacy (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003); and Kellner, Media Spectacle and the Crisis of Democracy (Boulder: Paradigm, 2005). 28 Douglas Kellner the terror attacks of September 11 on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the Bush-Cheney administration was yet able to put through a rightist political agenda under the frame of the so-called U.S. Patriot Act. What is more, through military excursions into Afghanistan and Iraq, the administration furthered the interests of the military- industrial complex and awarded billions in contracts to corporations to which the conservative regime was tied, including Dick Cheney’s Halliburton corporation.7) Eventually, the oil and energy industries, the military-industrial sector, the housing and financial sector, and other corporations who had supported the Bush-Cheney administration were rewarded as the government passed legislation that deregulated these sectors and provided copious public contracts to corporations like Halliburton. The media largely went along with the turn toward the right, and, especially following the 9/11 terror attacks, did not directly criticize the Bush- Cheney administration. After the Hurricane Katrina fiasco in 2005, followed by the apparent collapse of the U.S. financial sector in 2008, the media finally began critique of the Bush-Cheney agenda. In retrospect, the Bush-Cheney era can be explained by the elite theories of C. Wright Mills in that during this era, Big Business, Big Government, and the military-industrial complex were aligned to carry out an agenda in the interests of these elites. The election of Barack Obama seemed to put in question classical power elite theory, although Obama’s challenges in office and the defeats received by Obama and the Democratic Party in the 2010 elections, suggest that 7)On the September 11 terror attacks and how they enabled the Bush- Cheney administration to push through a rightwing and corporate agenda, see Kellner, Media Spectacle (London and New York: Routledge, 2003). !!!ObamaPluralismSpectacle: Barack Obama, the Power Elite and Media Spectacle 29 elite theory still has purchase in explaining American politics and should not be abandoned out of hand in favor of a new pluralist theory of a postmodern politics. I will, however, argue that the phenomenon of media spectacle has become a central factor in contemporary American politics and society, and that this creates new political opening and politics. I argue that in the contemporary era of media politics, image and media spectacle are playing an increasingly important role in presidential politics and other domains of society. With the growing tabloidization of corporate journalism, lines between news, information and entertainment have blurred, and politics has become a form of entertainment and spectacle. Candidates enlist celebrities in their election campaigns and are increasingly covered by journalists in the same way as celebrities, with tabloidized news obsessing about their private lives. In this context, presidential candidates themselves become celebrities and are packaged and sold like the products of the culture industry. In this study, I will suggest some of the ways that the logic of the spectacle promoted the candidacy of Barack Obama and how he has become a master of the spectacle and global celebrity of the top rank. I will discuss how he became a super-celebrity in the presidential primaries and general election of 2008 and utilized media spectacle to help his win the presidency. Finally, I will discuss how Obama and his administration came up against the forces of traditional power elites, including relatively new forces of rightwing political power, that weakened his presidency and threatened his continued power after the 2010 midterm elections. But first I want to elucidate the power of media spectacle in contemporary U.S. and global powers and 30 Douglas Kellner the emerging role of political figures as celebrities. Media Spectacle, Celebrity, and Contemporary U.S. Politics In the contemporary era, celebrities are mass idols, venerated and celebrated by the media. The media produces celebrities and so naturally the most popular figures promoted by the media industries become celebrities. Entertainment industry figures and sports stars have long been at the center of celebrity culture, employing public relations and image specialists to put out positive buzz and stories concerning themselves, but business tycoons and politicians have also become celebrities in recent years. Chris Rojek distinguishes between “ascribed celebrity,” which concerns lineage, such as belonging to the Royal Family in the United Kingdom, or the Bush or Kennedy families in the United States; “achieved
Recommended publications
  • ELITES, POWER SOURCES and DEMOCRACY by DENZ YETKN
    ELITES, POWER SOURCES AND DEMOCRACY by DEN İZ YETK İN Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University 2008 ELITES, POWER SOURCES AND DEMOCRACY APPROVED BY: Asst. Prof. Dr.Nedim Nomer: ……………………. (Dissertation Supervisor) Prof. Sabri Sayarı: ……………………. Prof. Tülay Artan: ……………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: …………………… To my parents... © Deniz Yetkin 2008 All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………vi Abstract...……………………………………………………………………………..…vii Özet…….……………………………………………………………………………….viii INTRODUCTION .…………………………………………………….......…………....1 CHAPTER 1..……………………………………………………………………………6 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF ELITE DISCUSSION 1.1 Machiavelli and His Followers……………………………………………....7 1.2 The Classical Elite Theorists……………………………………………......8 1.2.1 Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) and the ‘Governing Elite’…………..…….....8 1.2.2 Gaetano Mosca (1858- 1941) and the ‘Ruling Class’……….………...….21 1.2.3 Robert Michels (1876-1936) and the ‘Dominant Class’……………...…..23 1.2.4 C. Wright Mills (1916-1962) and ‘The Power Elite’………..……………26 1.3 Who are Elites? ……………………………………………………………30 CHAPTER 2 ..……………………………………………………………….………….32 POWER SOURCES, POWER SCOPE OF ELITES, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF DEMOCRACY 2.1 Power and Democracy in Classical Elite Theories...……………………….33 2.2. A New Approach to Elites, Power Sources and Democracy...…………….38 CONCLUSION ..……………………………………………………………………….47 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………….……..49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor Asst. Prof. Nedim Nomer. I believe that without his support and guidance the writing of this thesis would have been difficult. Moreover, I am grateful to Prof. Sabri Sayarı and Prof. Tülay Artan for their precious comments. Apart from academic realm, I also would like to thank all my friends: I am grateful to my friends at Sabancı University for making my study enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • For Obama, Being Right Is No Longer Enough
    The Republican Race That Wasn't Lincoln Mitchell, Harriman Institute, Columbia University Posted: November 19, 2008 08:35 AM As the 2008 election recedes into history it is clear that it will be remembered as no ordinary presidential campaign, and not just because of the eventual winner. This campaign, which really began when George W. Bush was sworn in for his second term in January of 2005, or perhaps even earlier when Hillary Clinton announced her campaign for the US Senate from the State of New York in spring of 2000, was eagerly anticipated because it was the first presidential election since 1952 where neither a sitting vice president or president was running. For the most part, 2008 did not disappoint. The Democratic primary featured a hard fought struggle between two impressive, well-financed and talented politicians. The general election was characterized by fascinating plot developments, surreal cameo appearances by strange characters like Joe the Plumber and obscure historical figures like Bill Ayers, new phrases like "hockey mom", one last round of mid-twentieth style red baiting and ultimately, for those of us who are progressive Democrats, a very happy ending. There was one part of this election season, however, which was a real disappointment. That, of course, was the Republican primary. For pure theater, the cast of characters seeking the Republican nomination promised perhaps even greater drama than the Democratic primary. The Republican primary had a 1970s style curmudgeonly Cold Warrior, a slick and well-spoken 21st century capitalist, a charmingly reactionary evangelist, a perpetually angry former mayor of New York City whose personal life had been an ongoing soap opera for years, a very thoughtful and serious 19th century Whig, and, for good measure, a conservative southern senator who almost literally came from central casting.
    [Show full text]
  • Giants: the Global Power Elite
    Secrecy and Society ISSN: 2377-6188 Volume 2 Number 2 Teaching Secrecy Article 13 January 2021 Giants: The Global Power Elite Susan Maret San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/secrecyandsociety Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Other Sociology Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public olicyP and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Maret, Susan. 2021. "Giants: The Global Power Elite." Secrecy and Society 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31979/2377-6188.2021.020213 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ secrecyandsociety/vol2/iss2/13 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Secrecy and Society by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Giants: The Global Power Elite Keywords human rights, C. Wright Mills, openness, power elite, secrecy, transnational corporations, transparency This book review is available in Secrecy and Society: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ secrecyandsociety/vol2/iss2/13 Maret: Giants: The Global Power Elite Review, Giants: The Global Power Elite by Peter Philips Reviewed by Susan Maret Giants: The Global Power Elite, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2018. 384pp. / ISBN: 9781609808716 (paperback) / ISBN: 9781609808723 (ebook) https://www.sevenstories.com/books/4097-giants The strength of Giants: The Global Power Elite lies in its heavy documentation of the "globalized power elite, [a] concept of the Transnationalist Capitalist Class (TCC), theorized in the academic literature for some twenty years" (Phillips 2018, 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Remarks to an Overflow Crowd at a Campaign Rally for Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillar
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Remarks to an Overflow Crowd at a Campaign Rally for Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton and Democratic Senatorial Candidate Catherine Cortez Masto in North Las Vegas, Nevada October 23, 2016 The President. Hello, Las Vegas! How is everybody doing? Good? So I'm sorry that it's a little crowded up in there. But I just wanted to let you guys know how much I appreciate you. I would not be President if it weren't for all the work that so many of you did back in 2008, back in 2012. But if we're going to continue all the progress that we've made, then we are going to have to make sure that we vote this time out. So I need everybody here to not just vote yourselves, but you've got to get your friends, your neighbors, your cousins. If you're not 18 and you can't vote, make sure your parents vote and your cousins vote. Because that's the only way we're going to be able to continue the progress that we've made. If you care about putting people back to work, then you want Hillary Clinton as President of the United States. If you want to make sure that immigration reform gets passed, we've got to have Catherine Cortez Masto in the United States Senate. If you want to make sure that we continue to make progress on education and making college affordable, then we've got to have more Democratic Members of Congress in the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • As the Race for the Presidency Enters Its Final Days, This Poll Finds Democrat Barack Obama with a Nine Point Lead Over Republic
    CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL For release: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:30 pm (EDT) THE CAMPAIGN: FIVE DAYS TO GO October 25-29, 2008 Barack Obama has reached key thresholds with voters when it comes to overcoming some of his perceived weaknesses: more than half say he is prepared for the job, and nearly half are confident in his ability to handle an international crisis. Most voters expect the Democratic nominee to reach across the aisle, and say he understands and cares about them. And Obama benefits from a surge in early voting and first time voters. But polarization remains: more than half of those currently supporting John McCain say they would be “scared” of an Obama presidency. And the remaining uncommitted voters resemble current McCain voters more than they do Obama supporters. As the race for the presidency enters its final days, this poll finds the Democratic ticket with an eleven point lead over the Republicans among likely voters (including those who lean toward a candidate), with just 5% undecided. CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT (Among likely voters including leaners) Obama-Biden 52% McCain-Palin 41 Undecided 5 Among likely voters excluding those who lean toward a candidate, the margin is the same. More than nine in 10 of each candidate’s voters say they have made up their minds about who to vote for. Fewer than one in ten of either candidate’s voters say they could still change their minds. IS YOUR MIND MADE UP? (Among likely voters with a candidate choice) Obama voters McCain voters Yes 93% 91% No, too soon 7 9 17% of registered voters say they have already voted (by absentee ballot or at early voting sites), and by a large margin they have voted for Barack Obama over John McCain.
    [Show full text]
  • Wealth Creation Or Redistribution a Hockey Momʼs Defense of Joe the Plumber
    Roddy A. Stegemann Hong Kong Language Needs Assessment Project [email protected] The Beginning of a Solution Wealth Creation or Redistribution A Hockey Momʼs Defense of Joe the Plumber During the third and final 2008 presidential election debate John S. McCain sought to emphasize an important ideological divide between the Republican and the Democratic parties. In order to bring home his point McCain evoked a televised campaign-trail conversation between his presidential rival Barack H. Obama and a once obscure, now enormously popular, unlicensed plumber from Holland, Ohio with back- taxes -- Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher. The reason for this evocation was Obamaʼs reply to Mr. Wurzelbacher when he questioned the Democratic candidate about his proposed tax reforms: "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."1 Just how misleading was it then, when Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin, John McCainʼs Vice Presidential running-mate, later commented at a West Chester, Ohio rally, “Joe suggested that that sounded a little bit like socialism”?2 The answer to this question can be obtained by examining the full context of Obamaʼs statement. This is what he said just prior to the above comment, "It's not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody that is behind you, that they have a chance for success, too.” 3 The keyword in the above text is chance. In other words, it is not a matter of taking one personʼs wealth and giving it to another for the otherʼs consumption, rather it is a matter of making sure that everyone has an equal chance at earning the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama and Celebrity Spectacle1
    International Journal of Communication 3 (2009), 715-741 1932-8036/20090715 Barack Obama and Celebrity Spectacle1 DOUGLAS KELLNER University of California at Los Angeles In the contemporary era of media politics, image and media spectacle have played an increasingly important role in presidential politics and other domains of society. With the increasing tabloidization of corporate journalism, lines between news, information and entertainment have blurred, and politics has become a form of entertainment and spectacle. Candidates enlist celebrities in their election campaigns and are increasingly covered in the same way as celebrities, with tabloidized news obsessing about their private lives. In this context, presidential candidates themselves become celebrities and are packaged and sold like the products of the culture industry. In this study, I will suggest some of the ways that the logic of the spectacle promoted the candidacy of Barack Obama and how he has become a master of the spectacle and global celebrity of the top rank. I will discuss how he became a supercelebrity in the presidential primaries and general election of 2008 and utilized media spectacle to help his win the presidency. Finally, I will discuss how Obama has so far in the first 100 Days of his presidency deployed his status as global celebrity and utilized media spectacle to advance his agenda. In the contemporary era, celebrities are mass idols, venerated and celebrated by the media. The media produces celebrities and so naturally the most popular figures promoted by the media industries become celebrities. Entertainment industry figures and sports stars have long been at the center of celebrity culture, employing public relations and image specialists to put out positive buzz and stories concerning their clients, but business tycoons and politicians have also become celebrities in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?
    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Socialists of America Greater Detroit Local
    Democratic Socialists of America Greater Detroit Local January 2009 Detroit DSAers Celebrate at 10th Detroit DSA Succeeds in 2008 Electoral Annual Douglass-Debs Dinner Effort ver 125 DSA members, progressives, aving been rebuffed in our offers of and trade unionists gathered to cel- assistance to progressive Congressio- Oebrate our recent electoral success at Hnal candidates Gary Peters (9th dis- the 10th annual Frederick Douglass-Eugene V. trict) and Mark Schauer (7th district)—both of Debs Dinner. The dinner was held at historic whom were afraid of being red-baited--Detroit UAW Local 600 on Saturday, November 8th. DSA focused instead on local and state races. Local 600 was the home local of the partici- Our strategy was simple: Given our limited pants in the Hunger March of 1933 and is ad- resources and manpower, we concentrated on jacent to the Miller Road Overpass (site of the competitive races in which a progressive Dem- Battle of the Overpass in 1937 at which UAW ocrat was running for an open seat. In such a organizers were savagely beaten by Henry setting, the efforts of a small, but disciplined, Ford’s security personnel while attempting group such as ours might provide the margin of to distribute literature to workers at the Ford victory for the progressive Democrat. Further- Rouge Complex). The dinner is the sole fund- more, by helping to turn out the progressive raising event each year for Detroit DSA. vote in these state representative districts, we also helped to turn out the vote for Obama, and The co-chairs for this year’s Douglass-Debs to a certain extent, for Gary Peters.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Remarks at a Fundraiser for Democratic Presidential Candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton In
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Remarks at a Fundraiser for Democratic Presidential Candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton in Charlotte, North Carolina July 5, 2016 The President. Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! Oh! How are you doing, Charlotte? Are you fired up? You ready to go? Well, fired up! Audience members. Ready to go! The President. I'm fired up. Hillary got me fired up. She got me ready to do some work. So I hope everybody had a great Fourth of July. Audience member. We love you! The President. I love you back. I—now, first of all, let me just say I like any excuse to come to North Carolina. I just like North Carolina. I love the people in North Carolina. I used to—when we used to campaign here, I used to say, even the people who aren't voting for me are nice. You know, that's not true everywhere. [Laughter] So you've got great people here. And then, you've got great food. North Carolina has got some food. In fact, I will find someplace to stop and get some food before I head back to DC. I know you all have recommendations. [Laughter] I know I can't go to your house to get the food. [Laughter] Although, I'm sure you're an excellent cook. And then, you've got great basketball. [Applause] You've got great basketball. We all know that. We all know that. But I'm not going to get in between all the Tar Heel and Wolfpack and—[applause]—you know.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Sociology: the Dominant Paradigm Author(S): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol
    Media Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm Author(s): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Sep., 1978), pp. 205-253 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657009 Accessed: 30/11/2009 07:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theory and Society. http://www.jstor.org 205 MEDIA SOCIOLOGY: The Dominant Paradigm TODD GITLIN Since the Second WorldWar, as mass media in the United States have become more concentratedin ownership,more centralizedin operations,more national in reach, more pervasivein presence,sociological study of the media has been dominated by the theme of the relative powerlessnessof the broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to Work: a Public Jobs Proposal for Economic Recovery DEMOS BOARD of DIRECTORS
    BACK TO WORK A PUBLIC JOBS PROPOSAL FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY PHILIP HARVEY ABOUT DEMOS ēmos is a non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization. Headquartered in D New York City, Dēmos works with advocates and policymakers around the country in pur- suit of four overarching goals: a more equitable economy; a vibrant and inclusive democracy; an empowered public sector that works for the common good; and responsible U.S. engagement in an interdependent world. Dēmos was founded in 2000. In 2010,Dēmos entered into a publishing partnership with The American Prospect, one of the na- tion’s premier magazines focussing on policy analysis, investigative journalism, and forward-look- ing solutions for the nation’s greatest challenges. AUTHOR Philip Harvey Professor Harvey received his B.A. degree from Yale University, his Ph.D. in economics from the New School for Social Research, and his J.D. from Yale Law School. After clerking for the Hon- orable Robert L. Carter in the Southern District of New York, he worked as a Litigation Associ- ate specializing in employment disputes at the New York law firm of Debevoise and Plimpton. He also has been a Visiting Scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation, a Visiting Professor of Law and Economics at the Yale School of Organization and Management, and was the first Joanne Wood- ward Professor of Public Policy at Sarah Lawrence College. Professor Harvey’s research focuses on public policy options for securing economic and social human rights, with a particular emphasis on the right to work. He teaches Contracts, Labor and Employment Law, Law & Economics, and Social Welfare Law and Policy.
    [Show full text]