DOCSLIB.ORG

Connecticut Fund for the Environment (CFE)'S Bi-State Program Save The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Connecticut Fund for the Environment (CFE)'S Bi-State Program Save The Easygrants ID: 39264 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation NFWF Project ID: 1401.13.039264 LI Sound Futures Fund 2013 - Education and Mini-Grants - Submit Final Programmatic Report (New Metrics) Grantee Organization: Connecticut Fund for the Environment Project Title: CFE/Save the Sound Coastal Cleanup Program (CT) Project Period 11/01/2013 - 12/31/2014 Project Location Coastal areas and inland waterways within the boundaries of the Long Island Sound Watershed, CT. Description (from Proposal) Project Conduct fifty coastal cleanup activities along fifty miles of coastline, recruit forty cleanup captains, and Summary (from engaging and educating 2,000+ volunteers about the impact of floatable debris on Long Island Sound. Proposal) Summary of Connecticut Fund for the Environment (CFE)’s bi-state program Save the Sound came well Accomplishments within range of meeting its goals for its Coastal Cleanup project in Connecticut in 2014. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation funds during this grant cycle (11/01/2013 – 12/31/2014) supported the coordination of 48 beach cleanup events. Of those, we held 37 on or around International Coastal Cleanup Day (September 20) and National Estuaries Day (September 27.) This figure is slightly less than reported in our interim report because three cleanups had to be cancelled because of bad weather. At 48 cleanup events, however, we came well within our benchmark of 50 events. 2014 marked Save the Sound’s 12th consecutive year serving as the Connecticut Coordinator for the Ocean Conservancy’s International Coastal Cleanup, which mobilizes volunteers around the world to remove trash from beaches and waterways. In all, Save the Sound’s Coastal Cleanup program has brought together thousands of volunteers to remove nearly 140,000 pounds of debris from Connecticut’s coastline. Trash data is provided to the Ocean Conservancy to assist them in their planning and communications. Lessons Learned We learned to encourage Cleanup Captains to actively plan ahead with their volunteers for rain dates. Rainy weather was a factor in cancelling 3 cleanups and resulted in reduced volunteer turnout at additional cleanups. On the positive side, although we don’t benchmark the amount of trash collected for grant purposes, we observed a trend in less trash available to collect at many of our beach cleanup events. We learned that beach cleanups have become more popular in Connecticut and are being held at other times of the year, in addition to the ICC cleanups that we sponsor in September. A growing number of towns have asked us to conduct spring beach cleanups, but our resources do not allow that at this time. Some of those towns, however, have indicated that they may conduct spring cleanups of their own, suggesting that our effort is widely valued in the coastal towns where we have maintained a presence. We also learned about a possible collaboration opportunity for next year with Clean Water Resources Council based in Massachusetts, which is conducting some river cleanups in Connecticut. Activities and Outcomes Funding Strategy: Capacity, Outreach, Incentives Activity / Outcome: LISFF - Outreach/ Education/ Technical Assistance - # of schools participating Description: Enter the number of elementary, middle, and high schools participating in the project Required: Recommended # of schools participating - Current: 10.00 # of schools participating - Grant Completion: 7.00 Notes: The slightly smaller number of schools we worked with was more than offset by the larger number of community organizations we engaged. A different staff coordinator took on the program in 2014 and his outreach focus may have differed slightly from that of his predecessor. Funding Strategy: Capacity, Outreach, Incentives Activity / Outcome: LISFF - Outreach/ Education/ Technical Assistance - # people targeted Description: Enter the number of people targeted by outreach, training, or technical assistance activities Required: Recommended # people targeted - Current: 1000000.00 # people targeted - Grant Completion: 1000000.00 Notes: No change in the number of people impacted by the program. Funding Strategy: Capacity, Outreach, Incentives Activity / Outcome: LISFF - Outreach/ Education/ Technical Assistance - # websites, social media tools Description: Enter the number of websites and other social media tools used to disseminate information about the project Required: Recommended # websites, social media tools - Current: 7.00 # websites, social media tools - Grant Completion: 7.00 Notes: No change in the number of media and social media outlets associated with the program. Funding Strategy: Capacity, Outreach, Incentives Activity / Outcome: LISFF - Outreach/ Education/ Technical Assistance - # workshops, webinars, meetings Description: Enter the number of workshops, webinars, and meetings held to address project activity Required: Recommended # workshops, webinars, meetings - Current: 1.00 # workshops, webinars, meetings - Grant Completion: 2.00 Notes: We added one additional workshop for Cleanup Captains to meet busy schedules. Funding Strategy: Capacity, Outreach, Incentives Activity / Outcome: LISFF - Volunteer participation - # volunteers participating Description: Enter the number of volunteers participating in projects Required: Recommended # volunteers participating - Current: 2000.00 # volunteers participating - Grant Completion: 1375.00 Notes: Weather cancelled three cleanups and several that went ahead in poor weather conditions attracted fewer volunteers than expected, resulting in a reduction in the overall number of volunteers. Funding Strategy: Habitat Restoration Activity / Outcome: LISFF - Beach habitat quality improvements - Miles restored Description: Enter the number of miles restored Required: Recommended Miles restored - Current: 50.00 Miles restored - Grant Completion: 50.00 Notes: The number of miles cleaned remained constant despite the cancellation of several cleanup events because we added three new kayak cleanups, adding mileage at island beaches to our overall number for miles cleaned. The following pages contain the uploaded documents, in the order shown below, as provided by the grantee: Photos - Jpeg Photos - Jpeg Final Report Narrative - Standard The following uploads do not have the same headers and footers as the previous sections of this document in order to preserve the integrity of the actual files uploaded. Final Programmatic Report Narrative Instructions: Save this document on your computer and complete the narrative in the format provided. The final narrative should not exceed ten (10) pages; do not delete the text provided below. Once complete, upload this document into the on-line final programmatic report task as instructed. 1. Summary of Accomplishments In four to five sentences, provide a brief summary of the project’s key accomplishments and outcomes that were observed or measured. Connecticut Fund for the Environment (CFE)’s bi-state program Save the Sound came well within range of meeting its goals for its Coastal Cleanup project in Connecticut in 2014. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation funds during this grant cycle (11/01/2013 – 12/31/2014) supported the coordination of 48 beach cleanup events. Of those 48, we held 37 on or around International Coastal Cleanup Day (September 20) and National Estuaries Day (September 27.) This figure is slightly less than reported in our interim report because three cleanups had to be cancelled because of bad weather. At 48 cleanup events, however, we came well within our benchmark of 50 events and our volunteers, despite their reduced numbers, met our benchmark of 50 miles cleaned. 2014 marked Save the Sound’s 12th consecutive year serving as the Connecticut Coordinator for the Ocean Conservancy’s International Coastal Cleanup, which mobilizes volunteers around the world to remove trash from beaches and waterways. In all, Save the Sound’s Coastal Cleanup program has brought together thousands of volunteers to remove nearly 140,000 pounds of debris from Connecticut’s coastline. Trash data is provided to the Ocean Conservancy to assist them in their planning and communications. 2. Project Activities & Outcomes Activities Describe and quantify (using the approved metrics referenced in your grant agreement) the primary activities conducted during this grant. Briefly explain discrepancies between the activities conducted during the grant and the activities agreed upon in your grant agreement. Our primary goals were: Schedule and coordinate a minimum of 50 cleanup events, including at least 35 on or around International Coastal Cleanup (ICC) Day and National Estuaries Day 2014. We successfully coordinated a total of 48 cleanup events across Connecticut, 37 of which were held on or around ICC Day (September 20) or National Estuaries Day (September 27), with the remainder held in October, meeting or coming well within range of our target goals. Recruit a minimum of 40 Cleanup Captains to lead a minimum of 2,000 volunteers: We recruited 47 Cleanup Captains who led a total of 1,375 volunteers. The weather was rainy on many of our scheduled cleanup dates. Poor weather cancelled some cleanups and for those that went forward on poor weather days, our volunteer turnout was lower than anticipated. Engage three to five corporate partners: We met our benchmark, working with four corporate partners that led cleanups in the area of their businesses, encouraged their employees to attend and helped build community around the issue of clean beaches. Those businesses were:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Meadows Unit, Stewart B. Mckinney National Wildlife Refuge
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Proposal to establish and conduct Waterfowl Hunting at the STEWART B. MCKINNEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE GREAT MEADOWS UNIT STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT As a result of a 2003 lawsuit filed by the Fund for Animals, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required to amend environmental assessments that describe hunting programs at sixteen national wildlife refuges located in the Northeast Region. The amended environmental assessments will address the cumulative impacts of hunting at all refuges which were named in the lawsuit. This document addresses the hunting programs at Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge, Great Meadows Unit. Hunting at Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge was first proposed in the Environmental Assessment, Proposal to establish and conduct Waterfowl hunting at the Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge Stratford Connecticut, January 2004. Following a public comment period, the waterfowl hunting program was initiated in fall 2005. The remainder of this document details the hunting program alternatives that were developed and finalized in the 2004 EA. Cumulative impacts of the current hunting programs at the Great Meadows Unit will be addressed following a description of the Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Action proposed in 2004. Prepared by: Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge 733 Old Clinton Road Westbrook, CT 06498 1 Summary The purpose of this Assessment is to evaluate the environmental impacts of establishing and conducting a waterfowl hunting program at Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge (SBMNWR or Refuge) Great Meadows Unit. While hunting is currently not permitted on Refuge lands, historical records indicate waterfowl hunting was a traditional public use at the Great Meadows Unit (GMU) prior to acquisition by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches
    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources
    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Water Law: Judicial Allocation of Water Resources Ronert I
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Special Reports Connecticut Institute of Water Resources January 1967 Connecticut Water Law: Judicial Allocation of Water Resources Ronert I. Reis University of Connecticut Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/ctiwr_specreports Recommended Citation Reis, Ronert I., "Connecticut Water Law: Judicial Allocation of Water Resources" (1967). Special Reports. 3. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/ctiwr_specreports/3 Connecticut Water Law: Judicial Allocation of Water Resources ROBERT I. REIS INSTITUTE OF WATER RESOURCES THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS, CONNECTICUT Connecticut Water Law: Judicial Allocation of Water Resources REPORT NO. 4 Connecticut Water Law: Judicial Allocation of Water Resources By ROBERT I. REIS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF LAW THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF LAW The research on which this publication is based was sup- ported in part by funds provided by the United States Department of the Interior as authorized under the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, Public Law 88-379. COPYRIGHT © 1967 BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT Any part or parts of this book may be utilized, quoted, or otherwise reproduced, so long as reference and credit is made to this source. FoREwoRD W TrrH the growth in population and industry and with in- creased water use per capita, the development and allocation of our water supplies has become a critical problem not only for Connecticut but also for the entire nation. The successful handling of this vital natural resource is con- tingent upon a thorough understanding of the many factors which influence it. Prominent among these is water law. In 1966, the distinguished attorney and teacher of law, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Sound Futures Fund 2016 National
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Nov. 14, 2016 CONTACTS: Mike Smith, for NFWF, 703‐623‐3834, [email protected] $1.3 Million Awarded for Community‐Based Projects To Improve Health and Ecosystem of Long Island Sound Town of Mamaroneck, N.Y. – Today, top federal and state environmental officials from New York and Connecticut announced 25 grants totaling $1.3 million to local government and community groups to improve the health and ecosystem of Long Island Sound. The projects, which are funded through the Long Island Sound Futures Fund, will restore 27 acres of habitat, including coastal forest, dunes, and salt marshes for fish and wildlife. This grant program combines funds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “Protecting Long Island Sound is a top priority for the EPA," said EPA regional administrator Judith A. Enck. "These projects will support vital and diverse initiatives throughout the region. We must all work to improve water quality and reduce pollution in the Long Island Sound watershed, while involving the public in protecting one of our nation's most important natural treasures." ”A healthy Long Island Sound stimulates the economy of the region and these grants will help achieve tangible results on water quality improvements and habitat restoration in the Sound,” said EPA regional administrator Curt Spalding. “By showcasing local solutions, these grants also help strengthen and expand partnerships working towards ecosystem restoration throughout the watershed.” The Long Island Sound Futures Fund 2016 grants will reach more than 395,000 residents through environmental and conservation education programs and treat one million gallons of water pollution with water quality improvement projects, including more than 700 pounds of nitrogen reduced, and 6,000 pounds of floating trash collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Department of Public Health Recreation Program
    CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH RECREATION PROGRAM 2014 ANNUAL BEACH GRANT REPORT Lighthouse Point Park, New Haven WWW.CT.GOV/DPH/PUBLICBEACHES For information about this Annual Report please contact the author: Stewart Chute PhD, Toxicologist, Program Coordinator Connecticut Department of Public Health 410 Capitol Avenue, MS #51REC P.O. Box 340308 Hartford, CT 06134-0308 voice: (860) 509-7758 fax: (860) 509-7378 email: [email protected] This annual report is available at: www.ct.gov/dph/publicbeaches Visit the US EPA BEACON2 website to locate beaches and view beach data: 2 | P a g e http://watersgeo.epa.gov/beacon2/ Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 A: Elements of the Beach Monitoring and Notification Program ................................................................ 4 B: CT DPH Staff and Responsibilities ............................................................................................................. 6 C: Performance Criteria and Attainment of Grant Criteria ........................................................................... 7 Table C1: Generalized Description of US EPA’s Nine Performance Criteria for Grant Recipients ............ 7 Table C2: 2014 Rank According to Tier Classification Methodology ........................................................ 9 D: Performance Measures .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LISFF 2014 Projects
    Long Island Sound Futures Fund 2014 Grants in New York and Connecticut HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECTS - CT ON-THE-GROUND Ed Bills Fish Passage and Floodplain Restoration (CT) (#45395) Recipient: The Nature Conservancy Grant Amount: $150,000 Recipient Match Contribution: $53,213 Total Project Funds: $203,213 Project Area: East Branch, Eightmile River, Lyme, CT The Nature Conservancy will open up 8.3 river miles and restore 6 acres of floodplain and wetland, and 0.5 miles of riparian habitat, along the Eightmile River, CT. Project will remove a barrier, restore a natural channel, construct riffles for fish, and seed and plant floodplain habitat with native trees and shrubs. The project will improve access to 8.3 miles of valuable upstream river by removing the last barrier to fish passage along the East Branch of the Eightmile River for: sea lamprey, American eel, Atlantic salmon and brook trout; and blueback herring and alewife, diadromous fish species important to Long Island Sound. The Eightmile River, a federally designated Wild and Scenic River, is the first significant tributary to the lower Connecticut River which flows into Long Island Sound. Major activities include: barrier removal to open fish passage, excavation and riffle construction to achieve historic channel alignment, stabilizing and managing built-up sediment to avoid mobilization into the river, grading, seeding and planting 6 acres of floodplain habitat with a native plant mix and woody shrubs and trees to shade the banks and river benefitting cold water fish, and sharing information about the restoration at the Eightmile River Wild & Scenic Riverfest attended by over 500 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Habitat Restoration Efforts
    Coastal Habitat Restoration Efforts History Connecticut began its first restoration work in the 1930’s, conducting wildlife habitat management under the State Board of Fisheries and Game. The State Board existed until 1971, when it was incorporated into the newly established Department of Environmental Protection (now the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, “DEEP”). Since its establishment, DEEP has continued to pioneer efforts to restore a variety of natural habitats, including important coastal habitats, for numerous plant and animal species. Activities DEEP conducts or supports the restoration of coastal habitats, which are a management priority for Long Island Sound, in conjunction with various conservation partners. DEEP works closely with academic institutions, municipalities, and nongovernmental agencies like The Nature Conservancy, the National Audubon Society, and Coastal America. DEEP also works directly with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Long Island Sound Study, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and other federal agencies that can provide technical support, scientific insights, and funding for coastal habitat restoration projects. Coves and Embayments The Coves and Embayments Restoration Program was started in 1983 to address degradation of tidal coves and embayments resulting from tidal flow alteration, water quality degradation, and increased sedimentation. This program provides funding and technical assistance to municipalities to restore degraded tidal coves and embayments and other coastal habitats. Accomplishments Seventeen coves and embayments have been restored along Connecticut’s coast by providing funding for planning studies and/or restoration activities, including Norwalk Mill Pond, Norwalk, Davis Pond, East Lyme, and Alewife Cove, Waterford/New London.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Beach
    Ocean Beach Park, New London QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR THE BEACH MONITORING AND NOTIFICATION PROGRAM FOR CONNECTICUT COASTAL BEACHES AUGUST 2011 [revision 5.1, renewed with limited revisions] STATE OF CONNECTICUT STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 410 Capitol Avenue PROTECTION Hartford, CT 06134-0308 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 Jewel M. Mullen, M.D., M.P.H., M.P.A. Daniel C. Esty Commissioner Commissioner http://www.ct.gov/dph http://www.ct.gov/deep Quality Assurance Project Plan - RFA11178 Revision 5.1 Beach Monitoring and Notification Program for Connecticut Coastal Beaches August 2011 This document with limited revisions is a renewal of the Quality Assurance Project Plan, approved January 2011 The electronic file name of this document is: Beach_QAPP_rev5.1_with_signatures.doc The US EPA identifier for this QAPP is: RFA11178 The Approvals Page is dated: August 2011 Quality Assurance Project Plan - RFA11178 Revision 5.1 Beach Monitoring and Notification Program for Connecticut Coastal Beaches August 2011 APPROVALS CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH REGULATORY SERVICES BRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION BEACH MONITORING AND NOTIFICATION PROGRAM FOR CONNECTICUT COASTAL BEACHES AUGUST 2011 US EPA QAPP IDENTIFIER: RFA11178 CT DPH Project Manager: Signature Name: Ray Jarema, PE Date: Section Supervisor CT DPH Laboratory : Signature Name: Aristea Kinney Date: Supervising Microbiologist CT DEP Project Manager: Signature Name: Guy Hoffman Date: Environmental Analyst III USEPA
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Sandy Oceanfront Beaches in the U.S
    INVENTORY OF HABITAT MODIFICATIONS TO SANDY OCEANFRONT BEACHES IN THE U.S. ATLANTIC COAST BREEDING RANGE OF THE PIPING PLOVER (CHARADRIUS MELODUS) AS OF 2015: MAINE TO NORTH CAROLINA January 2017 revised March 2017 Prepared for the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. Tracy Monegan Rice [email protected] Recommended citation: Rice, T.M. 2017. Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Sandy Oceanfront Beaches in the U.S. Atlantic Coast Breeding Range of the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) as of 2015: Maine to North Carolina. Report submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts. 295 p. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Development ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Public and NGO Beachfront Ownership ............................................................................................... 9 Beachfront Armor ............................................................................................................................... 10 Sediment Placement ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated History of Waterford Connecticut
    s V, IN- .Definitive, nv U Haying in Waterford began in 1645 when settlers harvested their first West Farms crop. Farming was the town's chief source of livelihood for its first three centuries. Here haying is being done at Lakes Pond (Lake Konomoc) before the reservoir dam changed the lay of the land in 1872. MILESTONES on the Road to the Portal of Waterford's Third Century of Independence . Waterford's town hall opened in 1984 in the former 1918 Jordan School. Youthful scholars had wended their way to three previous schoolhouses at the Rope Ferry Road address. An ornamental balustrade originally graced the roof of the present structure. I 1~-I II An Illustrated History of the Town of NVA T E: R::F. O.-:R, xD By Robert L. Bachman * With William Breadheft, Photographer of the Contem- porary Scenes * Bicentennial Committee, Town of Waterford, Connecticut, 2000. From the First Selectman A complete and accurate history of our past serves as a guiding light to our future. We are fortunate to have had the collective wisdom of the Bicentennial Committee 1995-99 mem- bers and the fine intellect and experience of author Robert L. Bachman to chronicle the essence of our community's past. The citizens of Waterford are indebted to them for their fine work. Thomas A. Sheridan Bicentennial Committee 1995-99 Ferdinando Brucoli Paul B. Eccard, secretary Arthur Hadfield Francis C. Mullins Ann R. Nye Robert M. Nye, chainnan June W. Prentice and Robert L Bachman Adjunct Afem bers Dorothy B. Care Teresa D. Oscarson Acknowledgments -.
    [Show full text]
  • East End Neighborhood Revitalization Zone
    East End Neighborhood Revitalization Zone Strategic Plan of Action “Summary of Findings” Bridgeport, Connecticut Prepared By: Date: August 30, 2005 Prepared For: City of Bridgeport Office of Planning & Economic Development EAST END NRZ STRATEGIC PLAN OF ACTION BRIDGEPORT, CONNECTICUT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section: Page I. PROJECT –TARGET AREA DESCRIPTION 1 • Project Description/Project Area • Demographics – Existing and Projected Population; Housing • Objective • NRZ Involvement and Process II. EXISTING CONDITIONS – KEY NEIGHBORHOOD ELEMENTS 8 • Infrastructure i. Utilities ii. Roadways iii. Stormwater runoff – current drainage conditions/patterns iv. Flood Zone Boundaries • Traffic and Transportation i. Analysis of Traffic Incidents ii. Traffic patterns iii. Public transportation • Land Use Patterns i. Summary of Land Uses within the East End Neighborhood ii. Residential vs. Non-Residential Uses iii. Vacant properties iv. Blighted properties • Zoning • Neighborhood Services – Community Resources • Recreational Resources & Open Space • Environmental Conditions i. Introduction/Background ii. Identification of Existing Sources of Environmental Concern and Qualitative Evaluation of Potential Environmental Risks iii. Brownfields III. SUMMARY OF EXISTING PLANS 31 IV. MARKET ANALYSIS 32 V. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 37 • Community Survey • Design workshop VI. PROPOSED PLANNING INITIATIVES 30 East End Strategic Plan i A. Neighborhood Framework/Circulation Plan i. Description of initiative ii. Goals iii. Neighborhood analysis iv. Neighborhood Circulation Plan v. Gateways B. Neighborhood Open Space i. Description of initiative ii. Goals iii. Open space and buffer opportunities iv. Redesign/Improvement of Newfield Park v. Reuse of Newfield School vi. Access to Waterfront vii. Pocket Parks viii. New elementary school recreational opportunities C. Seaview Avenue Corridor i. Description of initiative ii. Goals iii. Seaview Ave expansion/Port-neighborhood iv.
    [Show full text]