Friedrich Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil a New Translation by Marion Faber

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Friedrich Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil a New Translation by Marion Faber Friedrich Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil A new translation by Marion Faber OXFORD WORLD'S CLASSICS --�- --�'-- ' OXFORD WORLD S CLASSICS BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE (1844-1900) was born in Rocken, Saxony, and educated at the universities of Bonn and Leipzig. At the age of only 24 he was appointed Professor of Classical Philology at the University of Basle, but prolonged bouts of ill health forced him to resign from his post in 1879. Over the next decade he shuttled between the Swiss Alps and the Mediterranean coast, devoting himself entirely to thinking and writing. His early books and pamph­ lets (The Birth o.fTragedy, Untimely Meditations) were heavily influ­ enced by Wagner and Schopenhauer, but from Human, All Too Human (1878) on, his thought began to develop more indepen­ dently, and he published a series of ground-breaking philosophical works (The Gay Seima, Thus Spake Zarathustra, Beyond Go()d and Evil, On the Genealogy ofJl,forals) which culminated in a frenzy of production in the dosing months of 1888. In January 1889 Nietz­ sche suffered a mental breakdown from which he was never to recover, and he died in Weimar eleven years later. MARION FABER is Professor of German at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania. Her earlier translations include Nietzsche's Human, All Too Human (1994) and Wolfgang Hildesheimer's Afozal't (1983), a nominee for the American Book Award in trans­ lation. ROBERT C. HOLUB teaches German intellectual, cultural, and literary history in the German department at the University of California, Berkeley. Among his numerous publications on these topics are Reflections of Realism (1991); Jurgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere (1991); Crossing Borders: Reception Them)!, Poststruauralism, Deconstruction (1992); and Friedrich Nietzsche (1995)· He is the editor of Impure Reason: Dialectic of Enlightenment in Germany (1993), Resp()nsibiliZy and Commitment (1996), and Hein­ rich Heine '5 Contested Identities (1998). ' OXFORD WORLD S CLASSICS For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics have brought readers closer 10 the world's great literature. Now with over 700 titles�from the 4,000�year�old myths of Mesopotamia to the twentieth century's greatest novels··the series makes available lesser�known as well as celebrated writing. The p(lcket�sized hardbacks of the early years contained introductions ky Virginia Wool./: T. S. Eliot, Graham Greene, and other literary figures which enriched the experience of reading. Today the series is recognized for its fine scholarship and reliability in texts that span world literature, drama and poetry, religion, philosophy and politics. Each edition includes perceptive commentary and essential background information to meet the changing needs of readers. OXFORD WORLD'S CLASSICS FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE Beyond Good and Evil Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future Translated and Edited by MARION FABER With an Introduction by ROBERT C. HOLUB OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS OUORD UNIVERSITY PRESS (ire"! (:t.ITcnuull SIrt..Tt, (hfilrL! t1X2 6111' (hfilf(l linin.'fsily Press is" department of tilt" l in;\,cfsity of (hlmd It fUrlht'f\ till' lJniH:rsin'� ohJl:cti\ e of ncellcncl' 111 fc\(',ndl, scholarship, and eJucuio!l 11:; puhlishin� worldwi(k in ()\ftlH\ New York Athclls Auckland BJ.I1�k()k Bo�ot;'1 BIll'IlUS Aia's (.;tlnllta (:.IIW Town (:hcnnai I )ar c.o; S<liaam I )clhi FloTclH.'c Ilnn� KOlll-!: ist;lIliml Karachi Kuala I.umpur 1\1;adrid ,l\lelbourIle I\lc\ico Cil\ :"I UIll1 b,li i\;lIfohi 1);lr; ... S:lo Paulo Shan�hai Singapore T:l1pt·j Tokvo ToroJllo Wafo.;:1\\ wilh associatl'li ('omp,lIlies in Bcrlin lh,H.Lm (h(ord L'i a rc�istcrl'tl trade mark ofO"ford t ·nl\n..,il� Pn's." in the l;K :md in l:cruin other countries Puhlished in the l 'nitl'd StOites hy (hlonl University Pn:ss inc., �l'W York J'LlIlsiatinn, NOll'S, Illlll'\ (', �hrion I'ahn 1lJ9S [ntrmllll"IHHl " Roheflllo[llb )IJ!)S (:hrolU'](>gi" lhmcl.lll.ariw 1997 Tht· moral ri�hrs uf the author ha\'e heen asserted I blailase ng-ht (hford l.!niHT"il\ Press (maker) First puhli'ihed as an (hfon.l. Wurld's (:ia'isics p;\Jlt'rh�lt'k I tillS Rl"l.... 'llt'd 200X All righl� fesetH·d. No part 01 1his publicltiolll1l:n hl' reprOllmnl, slUrnilil ,I \'\'lrle\,011 system, or rr.H1"milteU, in an\ lilfm 01'by 0111\' nH'all�, without till' pri(,r permissiun in writing of {),timl UniWf'iilv I'fe<,s, or ,I" npressh pCfmiltnl bi" I;IW, or under terms a�fei.·u with the appropriate !'qml�r;tJlhies rig-ht-. Ilrg-anizatinns. Enquirie .. cllneernin� rqmltillctllln outside tilt.: scope of the .lhovc should he scnt to the Rights Ikpanrnellt. (hford Lni\ LTsit� Pre,,"s, at the autin's" ,lhol t' rOlL mllq not circula1t: rhis hllok in any other hilldlllh or rO\'l'r ;llHI \llll must imposc thIS �ame condition (Ill ,Ill\" <It..:quin:l Briti"�h Lihnlr) Cat;lI()guin� in Publicatiun Data Data available r .illfar) 1)( (:on�rL�",," (:,It,li4)ging in Pulliicltil11l I hta '\Jiet7}.;('he, Fril'drich Wilhelm, I S44 I !JO() IJcllscits \ on (iut und Hiise, FIlg-li�hI Bc)ollli g-ood and eviL prelude to a philnsophy oj thc future I translated and Ldircd hy Marion Faher with.m introduction b) Robert C. Iloluh (Oxford world's da��i('s) Indudes hihliographical referellLcs mel inde\ FIhies. 2. Philosophy. 1. Faber, I\larioT1. II. Title. III Series: Oxford world's classics (Oxford University Press). PRllIJj42ES I'I'IS 19l-de21 'IS 151116 ISB'\i97il--j)-I'I-Y5.l7117-5 Typt:sctby Intype London I.td Printed ill Cift�at Uritain \n Cla)s Ltd, St Ives ph: CONTENTS Introduction Vl1 Tr anslator's lVote xxv Select Bibliography XXVl1 A Chronology of Friedrich Nietzsche XXIX BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL Preface 3 I. On the Prejudices of Philosophers S II. The Free Spirit 25 III. The Religious Disposition 43 IV. Epigrams and Interludes 58 v. Towards a Natural History of Morals 74 VI. We Scholars 93 VII. Our Virtues J09 VIII. Peoples and Fatherlands 131 IX. What is Noble? lSI Explanatory Notes Index 193 INTRODUCTION THERE is no better introduction to the mature philosophy of Fried­ rich Nietzsche than Beyond Good and Evil. Written during the summer of 1885 and the winter of 1886, this work assumes a pivotal position in his oeuvre. It was the first published work after the monumental Thus Sp ake Zarathustra, which laid out central tenets of Nietzsche's philosophy in parabolic fo rm. Conceived as a parody of the Bible, the fo ur books of Zarathustra presented the reader with the activities and speeches of the eponymous hero, who is surely Nietzsche's spokesperson. Beyond Good and EC'il covers some of the same ground, but in this \vork Nietzsche does not offe r us a narrative and parables that require interpretation, but rather a series of aphorisms. Nietzsche himself was conscious of the affinities in content between Zarathustra and Beyond Good and Evil. Writing to his colleague Jacob Burckhardt, the celebrated art historian at Basle, he claimed that his new book 'says the same things as my Zarathustra, but diffe rently, very differently'. But he was also aware that Beyond Good and Evil represents a return to earlier efforts from the 1870S and early 1880s, in which he did not communicate with his reader through a persona. In his correspon­ dence Nietzsche called his new work a fifth Untimely Meditation, referring to writings of the early 1870S in which he fo cused on a central theme or person. And he told a prospective publisher that he was ready to publish a second volume of Daybreak, a collection of aphorisms that had originally appeared in 1881. Nietzsche himself thus obviously saw Beyond Good and Evil in a variety of contexts that related to prior endeavours, from his essayistic works written while he was still a professor of classical philology in Basle to the more monumental undertakings from his years of travel in Switzerland and Italy. While we may agree that Beyond Good and Evil has affinities with several of Nietzsche's previous writings, we should be a bit wary of taking Nietzsche too literally when he makes claims about it as a continuation of earlier books. We should note, fo r example, that concepts central to Zarathustra are absent fr om Beyond Good and Evil. The 'superman' or 'overman', which was Nietzsche's \11l Introduction catchy expression for an evolutionary overcoming of the current state of the human species, or the quasi-scientific notion of 'eternal recurrence of the same', a hypothesis that all events have already occurred and "ill inevitably recur again and again, are nowhere to be fo und in the new volume. There arc ways in which Nietzsche did indeed return to criticisms of German society fo und in the [jntimel) ' Meditations, but Bevond Good ({nd Evil is not as limited in scope as these earlier essays were, and certainly more philosoph­ ically mature. While Nietzsche returns to an aphoristic style, such as we find in writings fr om Humiln, All 7ilO Human (IR78-q) to '['he Ga)' 5,'ciellcl' (IR8z), his new work represented a major step away fr om his so-called positivistic phase with its reliance on a scientific model, and towards a more sceptical, more intricate, and more synthetic vision. Thus although philosophical arguments fu n­ damental to Larathuslrll are repeated in Beyond Goot! {/nd Evil in a less enigmatic fo rm, and although many of the aphorisms that find their way into the final text were sketched out in notebooks com­ posed prior to or during the period of Zarathustra's composition, Be}/lmd Cood and Evil represented a new and a final stage of 1\ietzsche's philosophy, a culmination of his thought and insight into the human condition.
Recommended publications
  • Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (Selections)
    Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (selections) This is an excerpt from Beyond Good and Evil, a book written by Nietzsche in 1886, consisting of about three hundred aphorisms on various subjects. The central theme of this book is the problem of morality—how we should act. The startling conclusion Nietzsche draws in the book is that we ought to jettison the altruistic morality that society and religion has imposed on us, the morality in which we demonstrate care and concern for the welfare and well-being of others, and instead institute a new morality centered around the self, a new self unfettered by social norms and the “slave morality” of what Nietzsche calls the “herd.” The final culmination of this new morality which lies “beyond good and evil” can be found in the final chapter titled “What Is Noble?” According to Nietzsche, to be noble means to see oneself as the center and origin of all value. In fact, the terms “good” and “bad” originally designated simply what the aristocracy did and did not value. For Nietzsche, “life is precisely the will to power,” and historically members of the aristocracy exercised their will to power by exploiting common people and using them as they saw fit. Nietzsche calls the morality of the ruling aristocracy a “master morality. ” He contrasts this kind of morality with “slave morality,” which arose when common people tried to make their inferior and despicable lives more bearable by exalting as virtues such qualities as kindness, sympathy, selflessness, patience, and humility (the cornerstones of Christian morality). Slave morality gave rise to the pair of terms “good” and “evil,” which Nietzsche contrasts with the “good” and “bad” of master morality.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Deconstruction
    A GUIDE TO DECONSTRUCTION January 2003 Prepared by: Bradley Guy, Associate Director University of Florida Center for Construction and Environment M. E. Rinker, Sr., School of Building Construction College of Design, Construction and Planning 101 FAC PO Box 115703 Gainesville, FL 32611-5703 [email protected] And Eleanor M. Gibeau, Environmental Specialist Resource Management Group, Inc. 1143 Central Avenue Sarasota, FL 34236 [email protected] This “Guide for Deconstruction” was made possible by a grant to Charlotte County Florida from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Innovative Recycling Grant Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.........................................................................................................7 Deconstruction Overview...................................................................................9 Safety First ...................................................................................................................9 Survey ..........................................................................................................................9 Environmental Health and Compliance ........................................................................9 Asbestos Abatement ..................................................................................................10 Contracts and Specifications......................................................................................10 Historic Preservation ..................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Good and Evil—1
    Nietzsche & Asian Philosophy Beyond Good and Evil—1 Beyond good and Evil Preface supposing truth is a woman philosophers like love-sick suitors who don’t understand the woman-truth central problem of philosophy is Plato’s error: denying perspective, the basic condition of all life On the Prejudices of Philosophers 1) questioning the will to truth who is it that really wants truth? What in us wants truth? Why not untruth? 2) origin of the will to truth out of the will to untruth, deception can anything arise out of its opposite? A dangerous questioning? Nietzsche sees new philosophers coming up who have the strength for the dangerous “maybe.” Note in general Nietzsche’s preference for the conditional tense, his penchant for beginning his questioning with “perhaps” or “suppose” or “maybe.” In many of the passages throughout this book Nietzsche takes up a perspective which perhaps none had dared take up before, a perspective to question what had seemed previously to be unquestionable. He seems to constantly be tempting the reader with a dangerous thought experiment. This begins with the questioning of the will to truth and the supposition that, perhaps, the will to truth may have arisen out of its opposite, the will to untruth, ignorance, deception. 3) the supposition that the greater part of conscious thinking must be included among instinctive activities Nietzsche emphasizes that consciousness is a surface phenomenon conscious thinking is directed by what goes on beneath the surface contrary to Plato’s notion of pure reason, the conscious
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions Edward Matusek University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Matusek, Edward, "The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3733 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Problem of Evil in Augustine’s Confessions by Edward A. Matusek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Joanne Waugh, Ph.D. Charles B. Guignon, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 14, 2011 Keywords: theodicy, privation, metaphysical evil, Manichaeism, Neo-Platonism Copyright © 2011, Edward A. Matusek i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract iii Chapter One: Introduction to Augustine’s Confessions and the Present Study 1 Purpose and Background of the Study 2 Literary and Historical Considerations of Confessions 4 Relevance of the Study for Various
    [Show full text]
  • 'New Era' Should Have Ended US Debate on Beijing's Ambitions
    Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on “A ‘China Model?’ Beijing’s Promotion of Alternative Global Norms and Standards” March 13, 2020 “How Xi Jinping’s ‘New Era’ Should Have Ended U.S. Debate on Beijing’s Ambitions” Daniel Tobin Faculty Member, China Studies, National Intelligence University and Senior Associate (Non-resident), Freeman Chair in China Studies, Center for Strategic and International Studies Senator Talent, Senator Goodwin, Honorable Commissioners, thank you for inviting me to testify on China’s promotion of alternative global norms and standards. I am grateful for the opportunity to submit the following statement for the record. Since I teach at National Intelligence University (NIU) which is part of the Department of Defense (DoD), I need to begin by making clear that all statements of fact and opinion below are wholly my own and do not represent the views of NIU, DoD, any of its components, or of the U.S. government. You have asked me to discuss whether China seeks an alternative global order, what that order would look like and aim to achieve, how Beijing sees its future role as differing from the role the United States enjoys today, and also to address the parts played respectively by the Party’s ideology and by its invocation of “Chinese culture” when talking about its ambitions to lead the reform of global governance.1 I want to approach these questions by dissecting the meaning of the “new era for socialism with Chinese characteristics” Xi Jinping proclaimed at the Communist Party of China’s 19th National Congress (afterwards “19th Party Congress”) in October 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Evil in the Personal Experience of St. Augustine
    RUCH FILOZOFICZNY LXXVI 2020 2 Agnieszka Biegalska University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland ORCID: 0000-0002-5653-9684 e-mail: [email protected] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/RF.2020.024 Our heart is restless until it rests in you. St. Augustine, Confessions* Evil in the Personal Experience of St. Augustine The most disturbing issue that permeates all of St. Augustine’s work is the question of the existence of evil, experiencing it and inflicting it. Giovanni Papini claims that Augustine, “before he found himself in finding God, […] had to exhaust the experience of evil to the very depths”.1 This remark redirects our thinking about Augustine’s under- standing of evil from the field of theoretical considerations to the realm of his personal experience of evil, where his philosophical and theologi- cal thought seems to be rooted. For many years, Augustine experienced evil and inflicted it himself. In the Confessions we read: “our life was one of being seduced and seducing, being deceived and deceiving, in a vari- ety of desires. Publicly I was a teacher of the arts which they call liberal; privately I professed a false religion – in the former role arrogant, in the latter superstitious, in everything vain”.2 A sense of persistence in false- hood and iniquity, noticed by Augustine quite late, a few years before his death in 430 (if one can consider his Confessions as a testimony to this important moment) and his desire to know the truth about himself, * Saint Augustine, Confessions, transl. with an introduction and notes by Henry Chadwick (USA: Oxford University Press, 1991), 1, i (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Wonder Woman & Associates
    ICONS © 2010, 2014 Steve Kenson; "1 used without permission Wonder Woman & Associates Here are some canonical Wonder Woman characters in ICONS. Conversation welcome, though I don’t promise to follow your suggestions. This is the Troia version of Donna Troy; goodness knows there have been others.! Bracers are done as Damage Resistance rather than Reflection because the latter requires a roll and they rarely miss with the bracers. More obscure abilities (like talking to animals) are left as stunts.! Wonder Woman, Donna Troy, Ares, and Giganta are good candidates for Innate Resistance as outlined in ICONS A-Z.! Acknowledgements All of these characters were created using the DC Adventures books as guides and sometimes I took the complications and turned them into qualities. My thanks to you people. I do not have permission to use these characters, but I acknowledge Warner Brothers/ DC as the owners of the copyright, and do not intend to infringe. ! Artwork is used without permission. I will give attribution if possible. Email corrections to [email protected].! • Wonder Woman is from Francis Bernardo’s DeviantArt page (http://kyomusha.deviantart.com).! • Wonder Girl is from the character sheet for Young Justice, so I believe it’s owned by Warner Brothers. ! • Troia is from Return of Donna Troy #4, drawn by Phil Jimenez, so owned by Warner Brothers/DC.! • Ares is by an unknown artist, but it looks like it might have been taken from the comic.! • Cheetah is in the style of Justice League Unlimited, so it might be owned by Warner Brothers. ! • Circe is drawn by Brian Hollingsworth on DeviantArt (http://beeboynyc.deviantart.com) but coloured by Dev20W (http:// dev20w.deviantart.com)! • I got Doctor Psycho from the Villains Wikia, but I don’t know who drew it.
    [Show full text]
  • Beauvoir on Gender, Oppression, and Freedom
    24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy Beauvoir on Gender, Oppression, and Freedom 1. Introduction: Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) Beauvoir was born in Paris and studied philosophy at the Sorbonne. She passed exams for Certificates in History of Philosophy, General Philosophy, Greek, and Logic in 1927, and in 1928, in Ethics, Sociology, and Psychology. She wrote a graduate diplôme (equivalent to an MA thesis) on Leibniz. Her peers included Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Jean-Paul Sartre. In 1929, she took second place in the highly competitive philosophy agrégation exam, barely losing to Jean-Paul Sartre who took first (it was his second attempt at the exam). At 21 years of age, Beauvoir was the youngest student ever to pass the exam. She taught in high school from 1929-1943, and then supported herself on her writings, and co-editorship of Le Temps Modernes. She is known for her literary writing, and her philosophical work in existentialism, ethics, and feminism. She published The Second Sex in 1949. 2. Gender ‘One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman. No biological, psychological or economic fate determines the future that the human female presents in society.’ (II.iv.1) A. What is a woman? “Tota mulier in utero: she is a womb,” some say. Yet speaking of certain women, the experts proclaim, “They are not women,” even though they have a uterus like the others. Everyone agrees there are females in the human species; today, as in the past, they make up about half of humanity; and yet we are told that “femininity is in jeopardy”; we are urged, “Be women, stay women, become women.” So not every female human being is necessarily a woman… (23) So there seems to be a sort of contradiction in our ordinary understanding of women: not every female is a woman, otherwise they would not be exhorted to be women.
    [Show full text]
  • Why No Wonder Woman?
    Why No Wonder Woman? A REPORT ON THE HISTORY OF WONDER WOMAN AND A CALL TO ACTION!! Created for Wonder Woman Fans Everywhere Introduction by Jacki Zehner with Report Written by Laura Moore April 15th, 2013 Wonder Woman - p. 2 April 15th, 2013 AN INTRODUCTION AND FRAMING “The destiny of the world is determined less by battles that are lost and won than by the stories it loves and believes in” – Harold Goddard. I believe in the story of Wonder Woman. I always have. Not the literal baby being made from clay story, but the metaphorical one. I believe in a story where a woman is the hero and not the victim. I believe in a story where a woman is strong and not weak. Where a woman can fall in love with a man, but she doesnʼt need a man. Where a woman can stand on her own two feet. And above all else, I believe in a story where a woman has superpowers that she uses to help others, and yes, I believe that a woman can help save the world. “Wonder Woman was created as a distinctly feminist role model whose mission was to bring the Amazon ideals of love, peace, and sexual equality to ʻa world torn by the hatred of men.ʼ”1 While the story of Wonder Woman began back in 1941, I did not discover her until much later, and my introduction didnʼt come at the hands of comic books. Instead, when I was a little girl I used to watch the television show starring Lynda Carter, and the animated television series, Super Friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of Friedrich Nietzsche's Philosophy
    Traces of Friedrich Nietzsche’s Philosophy in Scandinavian Literature Crina LEON* Key-words: Scandinavian literature, Nietzschean philosophy, Georg Brandes, August Strindberg, Knut Hamsun 1. Introduction. The Role of the Danish Critic Georg Brandes The age of Friedrich Nietzsche in Scandinavia came after the age of Émile Zola, to whom Scandinavian writers such as Henrik Ibsen and August Strindberg were indebted with a view to naturalistic ideas and attitudes. Friedrich Nietzsche appears to me the most interesting writer in German literature at the present time. Though little known even in his own country, he is a thinker of a high order, who fully deserves to be studied, discussed, contested and mastered (Brandes 1915: 1). This is what the Danish critic Georg Brandes asserted in his long Essay on Aristocratic Radicalism, which was published in August 1889 in the periodical Tilskueren from Copenhagen, and this is the moment when Nietzsche became to be known not only in Scandinavia but also in other European countries. The Essay on Aristocratic Radicalism was the first study of any length to be devoted, in the whole of Europe, to this man, whose name has since flown round the world and is at this moment one of the most famous among our contemporaries (Ibidem: 59), wrote Brandes ten years later. The term Aristocratic Radicalism had been previously used by the Danish critic in a letter he wrote to Nietzsche himself, from Copenhagen on 26 November 1887: …a new and original spirit breathes to me from your books […] I find much that harmonizes with my own ideas and sympathies, the depreciation of the ascetic ideals and the profound disgust with democratic mediocrity, your aristocratic radicalism […] In spite of your universality you are very German in your mode of thinking and writing (Ibidem: 63).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Asymmetry of Good and Evil
    Comp. by: Vasanthi Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0002526678 Date:6/5/15 Time:06:26:31 Filepath://ppdys1122/BgPr/OUP_CAP/IN/Process/0002526678.3d Dictionary : OUP_UKdictionary 15 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 6/5/2015, SPi 1 The Asymmetry of Good and Evil PHILIP PETTIT The thesis of this paper is that there is a marked difference between doing good and doing evil—in particular, doing good and doing evil to others—as we conceive of these actions in everyday life. Doing good to others often means doing them good robustly—controlling for good effects—whereas doing evil rarely has such a robust or modal character. This asymmetry thesis has a number of implications and I will concen- trate in particular on one.1 This is that it enables us to make sense of the Knobe effect, so-called: the effect, as it appears, whereby we are generally more willing to ascribe intentionality in cases where people do evil than in otherwise similar cases where they do good. The paper is in five sections. In the first I look at some important issues in the ontology of behavior, distinguishing between the acts or deeds whereby we produce effects and the actions or doings whereby we control for effects. In the second I show how we expect those who do good to others to control robustly for beneficial effects, being prepared at the limit to pay a cost in self-interest for securing that result. In the third I argue that we do not have the same expectation with those who do evil to others; they may aim at bringing about bad effects but not generally at any cost in self- interest.
    [Show full text]