The Gtpase Activating Factor for Transducin in Rod Photoreceptors Is the Complex Between RGS9 and Type 5 G Protein  Subunit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 1947–1952, March 1999 Biochemistry The GTPase activating factor for transducin in rod photoreceptors is the complex between RGS9 and type 5 G protein b subunit ELINA R. MAKINO,JASON W. HANDY,TIANSEN LI, AND VADIM Y. ARSHAVSKY* Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114 Communicated by Thaddeus P. Dryja, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, December 28, 1998 (received for review December 14, 1998) ABSTRACT Proteins of the regulators of G protein sig- then some transducin molecules would never activate PDE and naling (RGS) family modulate the duration of intracellular signal amplification would be diminished. Therefore, making signaling by stimulating the GTPase activity of G protein a the GTPase activation contingent on transducin association subunits. It has been established that the ninth member of the with PDEg ensures both high efficiency of signal transmission RGS family (RGS9) participates in accelerating the GTPase between transducin and PDE and timely photoresponse re- activity of the photoreceptor-specific G protein, transducin. covery. This process is essential for timely inactivation of the photo- Although the general scheme for transducin GTPase regu- transduction cascade during the recovery from a photore- lation, outlined above is well supported by experimental data, sponse. Here we report that functionally active RGS9 from several fundamental mechanistic questions are not resolved. It vertebrate photoreceptors exists as a tight complex with the remains unclear why the effect of PDEg observed both with b long splice variant of the G protein subunit (Gb5L). RGS9 RGS9-containing photoreceptor membranes (7, 8) and intact and Gb5L also form a complex when coexpressed in cell photoreceptors (10) is substantially more pronounced than its culture. Our data are consistent with the recent observation effect in reconstituted system with recombinant catalytic do- that several RGS proteins, including RGS9, contain G protein main of RGS9 (9). It is also not understood why the RGS9 g-subunit like domain that can mediate their association with catalytic domain is able to support the rate of transducin Gb5 (Snow, B. E., Krumins, A. M., Brothers, G. M., Lee, S. F., GTPase at physiologically fast rate, but intact RGS9 in the Wall, M. A., Chung, S., Mangion, J., Arya, S., Gilman, A. G. photoreceptor requires cooperation with PDEg. A major dif- & Siderovski, D. P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, ficulty in addressing these questions is that functionally active 13307–13312). We report an example of such a complex whose full-length RGS9 has never been purified or expressed. One cellular localization and function are clearly defined. possibility is that RGS9 in photoreceptors exists as a multiple subunit complex and that some of its properties could be Heterotrimeric G proteins act as molecular switches that relay manifested only within such a complex. excitation from activated receptors to effector molecules, such In this study we explored the hypothesis that RGS9 in as enzymes or ion channels. A G protein becomes activated photoreceptors exists as a multiple subunit complex and found upon the receptor-stimulated binding of GTP to its a subunit that indeed it is present as a tight complex with the long splice b and continues to modulate the activity of the effector until variant of the type 5 subunit of G proteins (Gb5L) that cannot bound GTP is hydrolyzed (reviewed in refs. 1 and 2). In many be separated from RGS9 under nondenaturing conditions. The signaling pathways, the duration of the signal under physio- existence of this complex has been shown by three compli- logical conditions is much shorter than would be predicted mentary approaches. First, RGS9 and Gb5L comigrate when from the intrinsic rate of a subunits of G proteins (Ga) GTPase photoreceptor membrane proteins were subjected to various activity. This is because GTPase activities of many Gas are chromatographic procedures. Second, antibodies raised dramatically accelerated by RGS (regulators of G protein against each of these proteins quantitatively precipitated both signaling) proteins or by the G protein effectors (reviewed in RGS9 and Gb5L. Finally, these proteins were coimmunopre- refs. 3–6). The phototransduction cascade of vertebrate pho- cipitated after expression in cell culture. toreceptors represents one of the most sophisticated examples of such regulation where the GTPase activity of the G protein, transducin, is substantially enhanced by the cooperative action MATERIALS AND METHODS of RGS9 and the g subunit of the effector of transducin, cGMP Purification and Washing of Rod Outer Segment (ROS) phosphodiesterase (PDEg) (7–10). The role of RGS9 is to Membranes. ROS were purified from frozen retinas (TA & provide transducin with the RGS homology domain, which WL Lowson, Lincoln, NE) under IR illumination as described acts catalytically in stimulating the rate of transducin GTPase. (11). To obtain membranes lacking most peripheral proteins g PDE itself does not activate transducin GTPase but it en- but retaining an active RGS9–Gb5L complex, ROS were hances the catalytic action of RGS9. The degree of this washed under IR illumination twice with isotonic buffer potentiation observed in physiologically intact photoreceptors containing 100 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl , 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM ' 2 is 7-fold (10). We believe that this ability of PDEg to TriszHCl (pH 7.5) and three times by a hypotonic buffer potentiate RGS9 action is essential for photoreceptor function. containing 0.5 mM EDTA and 5 mM TriszHCl (pH 7.5). When a rod photoreceptor is hit by photon of light it has to Urea-washed photoreceptor discs lacking the activity of RGS9 perform two tasks. First, it has to transmit the signal from were obtained as described (12). Rhodopsin concentration in excited rhodopsin to PDE with high efficiency. Second, it has to inactivate all activated proteins in the cascade, including a transducin, within a fraction of 1 s. If transducin is allowed to Abbreviations: RGS, regulators of G protein signaling; Ga, subunits of G proteins; Gb, b subunits of G proteins; Gg, g subunits of G be discharged by RGS9 before it forms a complex with PDE, proteins; ROS, rod outer segments; PDE, type 6 cGMP phosphodi- esterase from ROS; PDEg, the g subunit of PDE; GGL domain, G g b The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge protein subunit-like domain; GAP, GTPase activating protein; G 5L, long splice variant of Gb. payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in *To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Howe Laboratoryy accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston PNAS is available online at www.pnas.org. MA 02114. e-mail: [email protected]. 1947 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 1948 Biochemistry: Makino et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) y all membrane preparations was determined spectrophoto- for SDS PAGE. Antibodies against Gg2 were obtained from metrically (13). Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Preparation of Proteins. Transducin was purified from ROS Mass Spectrometric Fingerprinting. Mass spectrometric fin- as described (14). The only modification was that we bleached gerprinting analysis was performed by J. Lee at the Molecular rhodopsin in the retinas before ROS purification to increase Biology Core Facilities at the Dana–Farber Cancer Institute transducin yield by forming a tight complex between bleached (Boston). Protein mixtures were subjected to SDSyPAGE, gels rhodopsin and transducin, thus preventing transducin loss were stained by Coomassie blue G-250 (Sigma), and bands from ROS membranes during ROS isolation. Transducin containing proteins of interest were cut from the gel and pro- concentration was first estimated by the Bradford assay (15), teolyzed by trypsin as described (21). The molecular masses of and then the exact concentration of active transducin in each proteolytic peptide fragments were determined by MALDI-TOF preparation was determined by measuring the maximal (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight) spec- amount of rhodopsin-catalyzed guanosine 59[g-thio]triphos- trometry on Voyager-DE STR instrument (Perceptive Biosys- phase (GTP[gS]) binding (16). tems, Cambridge, MA). The values for molecular masses in Recombinant PDEg was purified by a combination of cation- digests were compared with the values from theoretical digests exchange and reverse-phase chromatography (17) from Esch- by using PROTEINPROSPECTOR MS-Fit software (available via erichia coli strain BL21 DE3 transformed with an expression internet at http:yyprospector.ucsf.edu). The probability of the plasmid containing a cDNA encoding PDEg (18). The PDEg positive protein identification was assessed with the molecular concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 280 weight search score described (22). Because the amount of nm by using a molar extinction coefficient of 7,100. protein in the bands originated from the gel filtration fractions GTPase Measurements. Transducin GTPase activity was was too small to obtain reliable data, we performed the , determined by the single-turnover ([GTP] [transducin]) analysis with the Gb5L immunoreactive band obtained from the technique described in detail previously (7, 19, 20). The concentrated alkaline extract of washed ROS membranes. The measurements were conducted at room temperature (22– extraction was performed as described (23) by 100 mM z 24°C) in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.8), 100 mM Na2CO3 with the pH adjusted to 12.0 by NaOH. Before the y NaCl, 8 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT. The urea-treated SDS PAGE separation, proteins in the extract were concen- photoreceptor discs used as a source of rhodopsin were trated by precipitation with 3% trichloroacetic acid. bleached on ice immediately before the experiments. For cDNA Cloning and in Vitro Expression. A mouse retinal measuring the activity in the gel-filtration chromatography cDNA library (provided by D.