Hydrogeological Assessment with App a and B.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrogeological Assessment with App a and B.Pdf W01S W01D W02S W02D (1 of 2) W02D (2 of 2) W03S W03D W04S W04D michael.jones From: shona.symon Sent: 02 October 2018 12:03 To: adam.james Subject: Fwd: 14746 - Information Request - Private Water Supply, Wakerley From: " foi " < [email protected] > Date: Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:20 AM +0100 Subject: FW: 14746 - Information Request - Private Water Supply, Wakerley To: "shona.symon" < [email protected] > Hi Shona The location of the borehole is as follows: NGR : 494638 296716 The approximate distance from the site is 1025m and the direction is south, south east. The name of the supply is Upper Laxton and it serves 7 properties. Regards Kayleigh From: shona.symon [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: 28 September 2018 12:11 To: foi Subject: RE: 14746 - Information Request - Private Water Supply, Wakerley This Message originated outside your organisation. Kayleigh, Could you be anymore specific about where this borehole is located (i.e. actual distance from site, direction from site, name of PWS ect)? Kind Regards Shona Symon Assistant Hydrogeologist WYG 1 Locksley Business Park, Montgomery Road, Belfast, BT6 9UP Tel: +44 28 9070 6074 From: foi < [email protected] > Sent: 28 September 2018 10:26 To: shona.symon < [email protected] > Subject: FW: 14746 - Information Request - Private Water Supply, Wakerley 1 Dear Shona Thank you for your request for information concerning private water supply. Your request, reference 14746, is being handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. East Northamptonshire Council can confirm that there is one private water supply within 2km of the coordinates given. If you have any further questions relating to your request for information please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, Kayleigh van der Vyver Environmental Services Admin Officer East Northamptonshire Council From: shona.symon [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: 26 September 2018 11:05 To: foi Subject: Information Request - Private Water Supply, Wakerley This Message originated outside your organisation. Dear Sir / Madam, I am undertaking an environmental assessment of the below site and would like to be provided with details on nearby private water supplies, within 2km of the centred position highlighted below: OS X (Eastings) 494394 OS Y (Northings) 297719 Nearest Post Code NN17 3AZ Lat (WGS84) N52:34:09 (52.569116) Long (WGS84) W0:36:31 (-0.608714) Lat,Long 52.569116,-0.608714 Nat Grid SP943977 / SP9439497719 Any issues with the above request or if you require any further information, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Kind Regards, Shona Symon Assistant Hydrogeologist WYG 1 Locksley Business Park, Montgomery Road, Belfast, BT6 9UP Tel: +44 28 9070 6074 www.wyg.com 2 michael.jones From: Lincs & Northants, Customer Enquiries <[email protected]> Sent: 11 September 2018 12:26 To: adam.james Subject: FW: discharge consents and pollution incidents within 2km of the site, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Attachments: Discharge consents and pollution incidents within 2km of the site Wakerley.xlsx Dear Adam, Enquiry regarding: Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Thank you for your enquiry which was received on 30 August 2018. We respond to requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information Regulations 2004. Please find attached the additional information you have requested. If you require the actual discharge consent levels for determinands (ammonia, BOD etc.), the Environment Agency can supply those. Please get in touch if you have any further queries or contact us within two months if you’d like us to review the information we have sent. Regards Nigel Cooper Customers and Engagement Officer Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Area Environment Agency Ceres House, Searby Road, LINCOLN, LN2 4DW 02084749704 49704 (Internal) 07879435031 From: adam.james [ mailto: [email protected] ] Sent: 30 August 2018 11:39 To: Lincs & Northants, Customer Enquiries < [email protected] > Cc: conor.lydon < [email protected] >; shona.symon < [email protected] > Subject: RE: Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Patricia, Many thanks for your email. Would you mind also confirming discharge consents and pollution incidents within 2km of the site. I apologise this was not made clear in my original email. Cheers Adam James BSc (Hons) MSc FGS Senior Geo-Environmental Consultant WYG 5th Floor, Longcross Court, 47 Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0AD Tel: +44 2920 570 325 Mob: +44 75 0095 1482 www.wyg.com 1 WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited. Registered in England number: 3050297. Registered Office: Arndale Court, Otley Road, Headingley, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS6 2UJ. VAT No: 431-0326-08. From: Lincs & Northants, Customer Enquiries < [email protected] > Sent: 29 August 2018 16:43 To: adam.james < [email protected] > Subject: Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Dear Adam, Enquiry regarding: Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Thank you for your enquiry which was received on 13th August 2018. We respond to requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information Regulations 2004. This data will be shared under the Open Government Licence, to read this and find out about permitted use, please click here . In regards to your enquiry ‘details on nearby groundwater and surface water abstractions within 2km of the centred position of NGR 494394,297719.’ We can confirm that there are no live groundwater or surface water abstraction licences within the site of interest NGR: 494394, 297719. A 2km radial, search using the grid reference Easting 494394, Northing 297719, was conducted – search undertaken 28/08/2018. Information provided is based on that available at the time of preparation (28 th August 2018). Timing of licence renewals and updates to the dataset may mean at any one point in time not all current live licences are listed Please note this search is only based on licenced abstraction (i.e. abstraction greater than 20 cubic metres per day). Abstractors abstracting less than 20 cubic metres per day, for any purpose, are classed as exempt and will not be required to apply for an abstraction licence or notify us – consequently this report cannot comment on whether there are any of these abstractions within the site of interest. Kind regards Patricia Fraser Customers & Engagement Officer Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Area Ceres House , 2, Searby Road Lincoln, LN2 4DT [email protected] (+44)0208 4748346 (Internal 48346) From: Lincs & Northants, Customer Enquiries Sent: 24 August 2018 10:09 To: [email protected] Subject: Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Dear Adam, Environmental Information: Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Thank you for your email of 13 th August 2018. 2 We are now dealing with your enquiry and will aim to reply within 10 working days. Whilst we make every effort to reply within this time, please be aware that under Freedom of Information we have up to 20 working days to reply to you. You can expect to receive a reply from us no later than 11 th September 2018. If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards Patricia Fraser Customers & Engagement Officer Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Area Ceres House , 2, Searby Road Lincoln, LN2 4DT [email protected] (+44)0208 4748346 (Internal 48346) From: Enquiries, Unit Sent: 16 August 2018 08:52 To: 'adam.james' < [email protected] > Subject: Ref 180816/RM04 Information Request - Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley CCN/2018/97281 Good Morning Adam I have passed your e-mail to the local customer team who will deal with your request. The Freedom of Information Act and Environmental Information Regulations state that a public authority must respond to requests for information within 20 working days, but we aim to respond to all enquiries as quickly as we can. You can find more information about our service commitment by clicking on the link below: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/environment-agency-customer-service-commitment You can contact our customer team directly on the contact details below, or call the National Customer Contact Centre on 03708 506506 who will transfer you to the area team. Please quote your enquiry reference 170816/RM04 in any correspondence with us regarding this matter. Customers and Engagement Environment Agency Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Area Waterside House Waterside North LINCOLN LN2 5HA Richard Melbourne Customer Service Advisor – Phones / Email Management Unit / Waste Exemptions / T11’s / CL:AIRE’s at NCCC Contact Centre Services - Operations: Regulation Monitoring and Customer Tel: 03708 506 506 Web Site: www.gov.uk/environment-agency Click an icon to keep in touch with us:- From: adam.james [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: 13 August 2018 15:48 To: Enquiries, Unit < [email protected] > Subject: Information Request - Groundwater and Surface Water Abstractions, Wakerley 3 Dear Sir / Madam, Please can my email enquiry be forwarded to the appropriate person in the agency… I am undertaking an environmental assessment of the below site and would like to be provided with details on nearby groundwater and surface water abstractions, discharge consents and pollution incidents within 2km of the centred
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Yorkshire Coast 4. Staithes
    05/03/2013 Geology of the Yorkshire Coast Dr Liam Herringshaw - [email protected] 4. Staithes – of Sand and Iron Early Jurassic Staithes Sandstone Formation Cleveland Ironstone Formation 1 05/03/2013 Staithes to Old Nab Simplified cliff section Rocks get younger towards south and east: RMF-SSF-CIF-WMF 2 05/03/2013 Staithes Sandstone Formation •Early Jurassic: Middle Pliensbachian Key features Sandstones with cross-stratification Burrowed siltstones 3 05/03/2013 Hummocky cross-stratification Fine-grained storm deposits 4 05/03/2013 Burrowed siltstones •After each storm, organic-rich silts deposited in quieter conditions Cleveland Ironstone Formation Transition from SSF to CIF, Penny Nab 5 05/03/2013 Oolitic ironstones Cleveland Ironstone Formation Modern oolites Warm, wave-agitated waters 6 05/03/2013 Stratigraphy Fossils 7 05/03/2013 Old Nab Ironstone burrows 8 05/03/2013 Siderite – iron carbonate Grows in sediment Needs low oxygen, low-sulphide conditions with iron and calcium Normally grey; turns red when oxidized Cleveland ironstone environment Fossils = marine conditions Ooids = high energy environment Primary iron-rich ooids = iron-rich waters Burrow scratches = firm sediments Shallow sea, wave-agitated, lots of runoff from land (with iron-rich soils?) 9 05/03/2013 Jet-powered Whitby Early Jurassic Whitby Mudstone Formation Grey Shales Black Shales Alum Shales Whitby Mudstone Formation 10 05/03/2013 Whitby Mudstone Formation Late Early Jurassic – Toarcian 5 subdivisions, mostly muddy Common features - sediments Finely laminated,
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Stone Study a Building Stone Atlas of Cambridgeshire (Including Peterborough)
    Strategic Stone Study A Building Stone Atlas of Cambridgeshire (including Peterborough) Published January 2019 Contents The impressive south face of King’s College Chapel, Cambridge (built 1446 to 1515) mainly from Magnesian Limestone from Tadcaster (Yorkshire) and Kings Cliffe Stone (from Northamptonshire) with smaller amounts of Clipsham Stone and Weldon Stone Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Cambridgeshire Bedrock Geology Map ........................................................................................................... 2 Cambridgeshire Superficial Geology Map....................................................................................................... 3 Stratigraphic Table ........................................................................................................................................... 4 The use of stone in Cambridgeshire’s buildings ........................................................................................ 5-19 Background and historical context ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Fens ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 South
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • EGU2014-10476-5, 2014 EGU General Assembly 2014 © Author(S) 2014
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 16, EGU2014-10476-5, 2014 EGU General Assembly 2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The stratigraphy and palaeoenvironment of the Bathonian “Great Oolite Group” of Woodeaton Quarry, Oxfordshire. Ronald Guthrie (1), Stephen Stukins (2), and Tim Raub (1) (1) Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9AL, Scotland, United Kingdom, (2) Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Woodeaton Quarry, Oxfordshire, represents the most continuously exposed section of the Upper Bathonian “Great Oolite Group” in the United Kingdom. Like most of the British Bathonian, it is lacking in reliable ammonite zonation from which to define a chronostratigraphy. The sedimentology of the succession can be broken up into two broad facies types: 1. A clay rich, brackish lagoonal environment with intermixed freshwater-influenced flora and fauna; 2. A marginal marine calcareous succession of an oolitic nature with periodic mud-drape intervals. The marginal marine depositional setting, the completeness of the Upper Bathonian stratigraphy and lack of biostratigraphically important macrofauna has motivated this study into the micropalaeontology of Woodeaton. The primary aims of this study are to use foraminifera and ostracods to reconstruct the palaeoenvironments and to refine the biostratigraphy of the Upper Bathonian. The studied succession commences at the top of the Taynton Limestone Formation, which fines upwards into the clay-rich Rutland Formation. Several species of marine ostracods known from the Mid-Upper Bathonian are recovered from the base of the Rutland Formation, such as Praeschuleridea confossa and Angliaecytherldea calvata, as well as fragments of fish scales and elasmobranch teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Character Assessment and Key Issues
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTER ASSESSMENT AND KEY ISSUES ‘LANDMARKS AND SIGNS’ COGENHOE PHOTO-CONSTRUTION 8’ X ‘4 JOHN HARPER 2005 CONTENTS 1.0 PREFACE 03 1.1 Introduction 03 1.2 Linking People and Place 04 1.3 Uses of the ECA 05 1.4 Key Issues 05 2.0 INTRODUCTION 06 2.1 Appointment and Brief 06 2.2 Characterisation in Practice 07 2.3 Approach and Methodology 07 3.0 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE’S ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTER 08 3.1 Introduction 08 3.2 Northamptonshire’s Environmental Character Areas 08 1. East Northamptonshire Claylands 09 2. Collyweston Plateau 12 3. Rockingham Forest 14 4. Welland Valley 19 5. Lower Nene (Aldwincle to Wansford) 22 6. Middle Nene (Northampton to Aldwincle) 25 7. Upper Nene Catchment and Watford Gap 28 8. Central Northamptonshire Plateaux and Valleys 31 9. Yardley Chase and Salcey Forest 35 10. Whittlewood 38 11. Tove and Ouse Catchment 40 12. Croughton Plateau 43 13. West Northamptonshire Uplands 45 14. Cherwell Valley 48 15. Vale of Rugby 50 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53 ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTER ASSESSMENT AND KEY ISSUES 1.0 PREFACE 1.1 Introduction The county of Northamptonshire extends over an area of approximately 2360 km2 and has a population of more than half a million people. It is located in the East Midlands Region, and includes seven District and Borough Council Administrative Authorities. The greater part of the county retains a strong rural character, and comprises agricultural land and isolated villages, hamlets, and country estates. The landscape bears the marks of changes which have taken place over many hundreds of years, with evidence of agricultural improvement, transport infrastructure, settlement, industry, mining and woodland management.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Note: Page numbers in italic denote figures. Page numbers in bold denote tables. Abel, Othenio (1875–1946) Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, Robert Plot 7 arboreal theory 244 Astrodon 363, 365 Geschichte und Methode der Rekonstruktion... Atlantosaurus 365, 366 (1925) 328–329, 330 Augusta, Josef (1903–1968) 222–223, 331 Action comic 343 Aulocetus sammarinensis 80 Actualism, work of Capellini 82, 87 Azara, Don Felix de (1746–1821) 34, 40–41 Aepisaurus 363 Azhdarchidae 318, 319 Agassiz, Louis (1807–1873) 80, 81 Azhdarcho 319 Agustinia 380 Alexander, Annie Montague (1867–1950) 142–143, 143, Bakker, Robert. T. 145, 146 ‘dinosaur renaissance’ 375–376, 377 Alf, Karen (1954–2000), illustrator 139–140 Dinosaurian monophyly 93, 246 Algoasaurus 365 influence on graphic art 335, 343, 350 Allosaurus, digits 267, 271, 273 Bara Simla, dinosaur discoveries 164, 166–169 Allosaurus fragilis 85 Baryonyx walkeri Altispinax, pneumaticity 230–231 relation to Spinosaurus 175, 177–178, 178, 181, 183 Alum Shale Member, Parapsicephalus purdoni 195 work of Charig 94, 95, 102, 103 Amargasaurus 380 Beasley, Henry Charles (1836–1919) Amphicoelias 365, 366, 368, 370 Chirotherium 214–215, 219 amphisbaenians, work of Charig 95 environment 219–220 anatomy, comparative 23 Beaux, E. Cecilia (1855–1942), illustrator 138, 139, 146 Andrews, Roy Chapman (1884–1960) 69, 122 Becklespinax altispinax, pneumaticity 230–231, Andrews, Yvette 122 232, 363 Anning, Joseph (1796–1849) 14 belemnites, Oxford Clay Formation, Peterborough Anning, Mary (1799–1847) 24, 25, 113–116, 114, brick pits 53 145, 146, 147, 288 Benett, Etheldred (1776–1845) 117, 146 Dimorphodon macronyx 14, 115, 294 Bhattacharji, Durgansankar 166 Hawker’s ‘Crocodile’ 14 Birch, Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • “Geochemical Characterisation of the Pliensbachian-Toarcian Boundary During the Onset of the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event
    “Geochemical characterisation of the Pliensbachian-Toarcian boundary during the onset of the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event. North Yorkshire, UK” Najm-Eddin Salem A thesis submitted to Newcastle University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Agriculture School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK. February 2013 I ABSTRACT The lower Whitby Mudstone Formation of the Cleveland Basin in North Yorkshire (UK) is a world renowned location for the Early Toarcian (T-OAE). Detailed climate records of the event have been reported from this location that shed new light on the forcing and timing of climate perturbations and associated development of ocean anoxia. Despite this extensive previous work, few studies have explored the well-preserved sediments below the event that document different phases finally leading to large-scale (global) anoxia, which is the focus of this project. We resampled the underlying Grey Shale Member at cm-scale resolution and conducted a detailed multi-proxy geochemical approach to reconstruct the redox history prior to the Toarcian OAE. The lower Whitby Mudstone Formation, subdivided into the Grey Shale Member overlain by the Jet Rock (T-OAE), is a cyclic transgressive succession that evolved from the relatively shallow water sediments of the Cleveland Ironstone Formation. The Grey Shale Member is characterised by three distinct layers of organic rich shales (~10-60 cm thick), locally named as the ‘sulphur bands’. Directly above and below these conspicuous beds, the sediments represent more normal marine mudstones. Further upwards the sequence sediments become increasingly laminated and organic carbon rich (up to 14 wt %) representing a period of maximum flooding that culminated in the deposition of the Jet Rock (T-OAE).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Geodiversity Action Plan for Oxfordshire’S Lower and Middle Jurassic
    Local Geodiversity Action Plan for Oxfordshire’s Lower and Middle Jurassic Supported by Oxfordshire’s Lower and Middle Jurassic Geodiversity Action Plan has been produced by Oxfordshire Geology Trust with funding from the ALSF Partnership Grants Scheme through Defra’s Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund. Oxfordshire Geology Trust The Geological Records Centre The Corn Exchange Faringdon SN7 7JA 01367 243 260 www.oxfordshiregt.org [email protected] © Oxfordshire Geology Trust, June 2006 Lower and Middle Jurassic Local Geodiversity Action Plan, Edition 1 Page 1 of 25 © Oxfordshire Geology Trust March 2007 Contents Introduction 3 What is Geodiversity? 4 The Conservation of our Geodiversity National Geoconservation Initiatives 5 Geoconservation in Oxfordshire 6 Local Geodiversity Action plans – Purpose and Process The Purpose of LGAPs 7 The Geographical Boundary 7 Preparing the Plan 8 Geodiversity Audit 8 Oxfordshire’s Lower and Middle Jurassic Geodiversity Resource Lower Lias 10 Middle Lias 11 Upper Lias 12 Inferior Oolite 12 Great Oolite 12 Oxford Clay 16 Fossils 16 Geomorphological Features 17 Building Stone 18 Museum Collections 18 History of Geological Research 19 Implementation Relationships with other Management Plans 21 Future of the LGAP 22 The Action Plan 23 Lower and Middle Jurassic Local Geodiversity Action Plan, Edition 1 Page 2 of 25 © Oxfordshire Geology Trust March 2007 Introduction Oxfordshire’s geology has long been admired by geologists and utilised by industry. In fact, it was a driving force for the industrialization of the nation through the exploitation of ironstone. Our geodiversity however, extends beyond our exposures of rocks and fossils to include landscape and geomorphology, building stones, museums collections and soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Report | Leicestershire and Rutland (Comprising City of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland)
    Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning Leicestershire and Rutland (comprising City of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland) BGS Commissioned Research Report CR/02/24/N D J Harrison, P J Henney, D G Cameron, N A Spencer, D J Evans, G K Lott, K A Linley and D E Highley, Keyworth, Nottingham 2002 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT CR/02/24/N Mineral Resources Series Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans: Leicestershire and Rutland (comprising City of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland) D J Harrison, P J Henney, D G Cameron, N A Spencer, D J Evans, G K Lott, K A Linley and D E Highley, This report accompanies the 1:100 000 scale map: Leicestershire and Rutland (comprising City of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland) Cover Photograph Bibliographical reference: Harrison, D J, Henney, P J, Cameron, D G, Spencer, N A, Evans, D J, Lott, G K, Linley, K A and Highley, D E 2002. Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: Leicestershire and Rutland (comprising City of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland). BGS Commissioned Report CR/02/24/N. All photographs copyright © NERC BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey Offices Sales Desk at the Survey headquarters, Keyworth, Nottingham. The more popular maps and books may be purchased from BGS- Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG approved stockists and agents and over the counter at the 0115–936 3100 Fax 0115–936 3200 Bookshop, Gallery 37, Natural History Museum (Earth Galleries), e-mail: sales @bgs.ac.uk www.bgs.ac.uk Cromwell Road, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Fracture-Fault Network Characterization of Pavement Imagery of the Whitby Mudstone
    Horizontal fracture-fault network characterization of pavement imagery of the Whitby Mudstone Q.D. Boersma Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands A Msc Thesis First Supervisor: Prof. dr. M.R. Drury (Utrecht University) Second Supervisor: dr. N.J. Hardebol (TU Delft) Third Supervisor: dr. M.E. Houben (Utrecht University) 1 Abstract Natural fractures play an important role in the hydrocarbon production from tight reservoirs. The need for fracture network pathways by fraccing matters particularly for shale gas prospects, due to their nano to micro darcies matrix permeabilities. The study of natural fractures from outcrops helps to better understand network connectivity and possibility of reactivating pre-existing planes of weakness, induced by hydraulic stimulation. Microseismicity also show that natural fractures are reactivated during fraccing in tight gas reservoirs and influence the success of the stimulation. An accurate understanding of natural fracture networks can help in predicting the development of fracture networks. In this research we analyze an outcrop analogue, the Whitby Mustone Formation (WMF), in terms of its horizontal fracture network. The WMF is the time equivalent of the Posidonia Shale Formation (PSF), which on itself is the main shale gas prospect in the Dutch subsurface. The fracture network of the WMF is characterized by a system of steep dipping joints with two dominant directions with N-S and E-W strike. The network was digitized from bird-view imagery of the pavement with a spatial extent of ~100 m at sub-cm resolution. The imagery is interpreted in terms of orientation and length distributions, intensity and fractal dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin A. Whyte & Mike Romano. Dinosaur Footprints Associated With
    Dinosaur footprints associated with an ephemeral pool in the Middle Jurassic of Yorkshire, UK Martin A. Whyte & Mike Romano Sheffield Dinosaur Track Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. ABSTRACT - A thin mudstone intercalation within channel sandstones of the Saltwick Formation (Middle Jurassic) of the Cleveland area of Yorkshire shows a succession of invertebrate traces followed by dinosaur tracks and then shrinkage cracks. The tridactyl prints, all made by the same type of small bipedal dinosaur, show an interesting range of morphologies, includ- ing imprints of the metatarsal area, consistent with their having been made in soft cohesive mud of varying moisture content. Some of the tracks indicate that the foot was moved backwards during withdrawal. Such foot movement can also be observed in modern emu locomotion. The pattern of shrinkage cracks is partly controlled by the prints. This sequence is comparable to the sequence of traces and structures which have been observed in a recent ephemeral pool and is interpreted as having formed in a similar environment. Uniquely for the Yorkshire area, the prints and cracks are infilled by small, now sideritised, pellets possibly of invertebrate faecal origin. Keywords: dinosaur, footprints, preservation, Jurassic, England, emu, faecal pellets. INTRODUCTION 1993), led to an erosional break between the Lower Jurassic (Whitby Mudstone Formation; Toarcian) and the basal Mid- Tracks are the commonest type of dinosaur fossil dle Jurassic (lower Aalenian) Dogger Formation, which is a and provide important evidence of the gait, speed, habit and thin, clastic marine unit (fig. 2). The overlying Ravenscar facies preference of these animals; evidence which often Group (Aalenian to Bathonian) is a predominantly non- cannot be obtained from other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synoptic Review of the Vertebrate Fauna from the “Green Series
    A synoptic review of the vertebrate fauna from the “Green Series” (Toarcian) of northeastern Germany with descriptions of new taxa: A contribution to the knowledge of Early Jurassic vertebrate palaeobiodiversity patterns I n a u g u r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald vorgelegt von Sebastian Stumpf geboren am 9. Oktober 1986 in Berlin-Hellersdorf Greifswald, Februar 2017 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Werner Weitschies 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ingelore Hinz-Schallreuter 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Paul Martin Sander Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: 22. Juni 2017 2 Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Geological and Stratigraphic Framework .................................................................................... 5 3. Material and Methods ................................................................................................................... 8 4. Results and Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Dinosaurs .................................................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Marine Reptiles .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]