DOCSLIB.ORG

Coral Reef Restoration Monitoring Guide Methods to Evaluate Restoration Success from Local to Ecosystem Scales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coral Reef Restoration Monitoring Guide Methods to Evaluate Restoration Success from Local to Ecosystem Scales DOI: 10.25923/xndz-h538 Coral Reef Restoration Monitoring Guide Methods to evaluate restoration success from local to ecosystem scales September 2020 NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 279 National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science SUGGESTED CITATION Goergen, E.A., S. Schopmeyer, A.L. Moulding, A. Moura, P. Kramer, and T.S. Viehman. 2020. Coral reef restoration monitoring guide: Methods to evaluate restoration success from local to ecosystem scales. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 279. Silver Spring, MD. 145 pp. doi: 10.25923/xndz-h538 PHOTOGRAPHY AND FIGURES No photographs or figures from this guide may be used without permission from contributing photographer or author. Cover image credit: Coral Restoration Foundation DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of NOAA. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Coral Reef Restoration Monitoring Guide Methods to evaluate restoration success from local to ecosystem scales Authors Elizabeth A. Goergen Qatar University, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Doha, Qatar Stephanie Schopmeyer Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA Alison L. Moulding NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, FL, USA Amelia Moura Coral Restoration Foundation, Tavernier, FL, USA Patricia Kramer Ocean Research and Education Foundation, Big Pine Key, FL, USA T. Shay Viehman NOAA, National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Beaufort, NC, USA Contributing Authors Anastazia Banaszak Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Puerto Morelos, Mexico Iliana Baums Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA Andy Bruckner NOAA, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Key West, FL, USA Valérie Chamberland SECORE International, Inc, Curacao A. Kirk Kilfoyle Broward County Environmental Planning and Community Resilience Division, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA Rennie Meyers NOAA Knauss Fellow, Rhode Island SeaGrant, Narragansett, RI, USA Margaret Miller SECORE International, Inc, Miami, FL, USA Michael Nemeth NOAA Fisheries, Restoration Center, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico September 2020 NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NOS NCCOS 279 United States Department National Oceanic and National Ocean Service of Commerce Atmospheric Administration Wilbur L. Ross Neil Jacobs Nicole LeBoeuf Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Administrator (Acting) About this Document The mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is for science, service, and stewardship, specifically to 1) understand and predict changes in climate, weather oceans, and coasts; 2) share that knowledge and information with others; and 3) conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources. The National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) provides federal partners and coastal managers with the information and tools they need to balance society’s environmental, social, and economic goals. NCCOS is the primary coastal science arm within NOAA’s National Ocean Service (NOS). NCCOS works directly with managers, industry, regulators, and scientists to deliver relevant, timely, and accurate scientific information and tools. NCCOS was funded to coordinate the development of this product in partnership with the Coral Restoration Consortium (CRC). The CRC was established in 2017 to foster communication and collaboration among coral restoration specialists, researchers, managers, and educators. The mission of this international group is to promote collaboration and technology transfer among participants, and to facilitate scientific and practical ingenuity to demonstrate that restoration can achieve meaningful results at scales relevant to reefs in their roles of protecting coastlines, supporting fisheries, and serving as economic engines for coastal communities. The CRC is dedicated to scaling up the coral reef restoration, science, and management efforts to enable coral reef ecosystems to persist through the 21st century and beyond. As of 2020, the CRC includes more than 1,800 people globally, and as the need for active coral reef restoration continues to expand around the world, the number of CRC participants continues to increase. The CRC’s Leadership team includes pre-eminent researchers, managers, and practitioners in the field of coral restoration. Core to the function of the CRC is the sharing and dissemination of knowledge in a way that transcends regional and methodological biases. The CRC has developed working groups to deliver guidance on key topics, including field and land-based restoration efforts, coral larval propagation, restoration genetics, monitoring, and resource management. In addition, new CRC working groups continue to form to address emerging topics. The core team of the CRC’s Monitoring Working Group wrote this report. Members of the Monitoring Working Group and other Working Groups also contributed content. This product synthesizes the best available information at the time of publication. We recommend that the CRC Monitoring Working Group update this product as new information continues to develop. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The synthesis provided here is a product of the CRC’s Restoration Monitoring Working Group. The Working Group appreciates the support of the CRC Leadership Team. Development of this report was funded by NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program and NOAA’s NCCOS. Elizabeth Goergen was supported by a National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine’s Research Associateship with NCCOS during the initial development of this document. All lead authors contributed to the writing and editing of this document and participated in a CRC working group meeting that was supported by the CRC. We appreciate the indispensable assistance of Sarah Hile, Maria Bollinger, and Meghan Balling (CSS, Inc., under contract to NCCOS) in assembling the report and editorial support. We are grateful for the many constructive suggestions and reviews to improve this document. We thank the following individuals for practitioner interviews and/or content reviews. Boston University National Park Service Les Kaufman Meaghan Johnson Coral Restoration Foundation Nova Southeastern University, Coral Reef Restoration, Jessica Levy Assessment, and Monitoring Lab Corales de Paz David Gilliam Phanor Montoya Maya Reef Renewal Bonaire Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Francesca Virdis Kerry Maxwell The Nature Conservancy John Hunt Aldo Croquer James Cook University Caitlin Lustic Margaux Hein Joseph Pollock Ian Mcleod University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Mote Marine Laboratory Atmospheric Science, Rescue a Reef Erich Bartels Diego Lirman Cory Walter University of Rhode Island Shelby Luce Amelia Moore National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Tomma Barnes Kelli O’Donnell Greg Piniak Julia Royster Dana Williams For more information on NOAA’s National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, please visit: https://coastalscience.noaa.gov/ For more information on the CRC and the Monitoring Working Group, please visit: http://crc.reefresilience.org/ Questions and comments on the Guide can be directed to: Elizabeth Goergen or Shay Viehman [email protected] [email protected] Paola Espitia Executive Summary As coral restoration efforts continue to increase in size and Goal-Based Performance Metrics address five major coral number, there is an overwhelming need to define restoration restoration goals: Ecological Restoration, Socioeconomic, Event- success and determine progress towards successful restoration. driven Restoration, Climate Change Adaptation, and Research. Meaningful, consistent, comparable, and quantitative data is Metrics are tailored within each goal to address key components required to quantify the changes that result from restoration of the goal. For example, when monitoring a restoration with an actions. However, there may be many definitions of success ecological goal, a practitioner should evaluate coral condition, depending on the program or project goal(s). Restorations species diversity, habitat quality, and vertebrate and invertebrate can have one or many goals that can be very different (e.g., communities, and potentially others. Metrics are detailed for ecological, educational), and therefore, goals cannot be each goal including key points, suggested methods, reporting addressed in a “one size fits all” monitoring approach. The guidelines, and criteria to evaluate the performance towards the application of quantitative approaches to monitoring not only restoration goal and towards restoration success. provides a reliable way to evaluate progress towards restoration success, but also provides means to identify problems and apply Coral reef restoration, while a quickly growing field, is adaptive management efforts as needed. still relatively new. This document is the first to provide comprehensive guidance for monitoring coral restorations to The CRC established a priority for the Restoration Monitoring evaluate progress towards meeting restoration goals. Metrics Working Group to develop guidance for monitoring coral and associated methods
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coral Diversity and Disease in Mexico
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 69: 23–31, 2006 Published March 23 Dis Aquat Org Coral diversity and disease in Mexico J. R. Ward1,*, K. L. Rypien1, J. F. Bruno2, C. D. Harvell1, E. Jordán-Dahlgren3, K. M. Mullen4, R. E. Rodríguez-Martínez3, J. Sánchez5, G. Smith6 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Corson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 2Department of Marine Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3300, USA 3Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 1152, Cancún, 77500, Quintana Roo, Mexico 4Department of Entomology, Comstock Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 5Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1E No 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia 6Department of Biology and Geology, 471 University Parkway, Aiken, South Carolina 29801, USA ABSTRACT: Field studies and empirical tests of the ‘diversity-disease hypothesis’ demonstrate the effects of species richness on disease transmission and severity in plant systems. Yet the converse, i.e. effects of disease on diversity, is rarely considered in either relatively well-studied plant systems or marine ecosystems. We investigated these effects along the Mexican Yucatan Peninsula to (1) quan- tify the relationship between disease prevalence and coral diversity, (2) test the hypothesis that octo- coral and scleractinian disease prevalence are associated with one another, and (3) establish a long- term dataset. Aspergillosis of sea fans and 6 scleractinian diseases were documented. Prevalence of aspergillosis declined from 12.85% in 2002 to 5.26% in 2004, while prevalence of scleractinian dis- eases remained relatively constant at 5.7 ± 0.8% in 2002 and 7.96 ± 0.7% in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reef Corridor of the Southwest Gulf of Mexico: Challenges for Its Management and Conservation
    Ocean & Coastal Management 86 (2013) 22e32 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean & Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman The Reef Corridor of the Southwest Gulf of Mexico: Challenges for its management and conservation Leonardo Ortiz-Lozano a,*, Horacio Pérez-España b,c, Alejandro Granados-Barba a, Carlos González-Gándara d, Ana Gutiérrez-Velázquez e, Javier Martos d a Análisis y Síntesis de Zonas Costeras, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Pesquerías, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Hidalgo #617, Col. Río Jamapa 94290, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico b Arrecifes Coralinos, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Pesquerías, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Hidalgo #617, Col. Río Jamapa 94290, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico c Centro de Investigación de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma del Carmen, Av. Laguna de Términos s/n, Col. Renovación 2da sección, CP 24155, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico d Laboratorio de Arrecifes Coralinos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Zona Poza Rica Tuxpan, Universidad Veracruzana, Carr. Tuxpan.- Tampico km 7.5, Col. Universitaria, CP 92860, Tuxpan, Veracruz, Mexico e Posgrado. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa 91000, Veracruz, Mexico article info abstract Article history: Flow of species and spatial continuity of biological processes between geographically separated areas Available online may be achieved using management tools known as Ecological Corridors (EC). In this paper we propose an EC composed of three highly threatened coral reef systems in the Southwest Gulf of Mexico: Sistema Arrecifal Lobos Tuxpan, Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano and Arrecifes de los Tuxtlas. The proposed EC is supported by the concept of Marine Protected Areas Networks, which highlights the biogeographical and habitat heterogeneity representations as the main criteria to the establishment of this kind of networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Studies in Marine Science Reef Condition and Protection Of
    Regional Studies in Marine Science 32 (2019) 100893 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Regional Studies in Marine Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rsma Reef condition and protection of coral diversity and evolutionary history in the marine protected areas of Southeastern Dominican Republic ∗ Camilo Cortés-Useche a,b, , Aarón Israel Muñiz-Castillo a, Johanna Calle-Triviño a,b, Roshni Yathiraj c, Jesús Ernesto Arias-González a a Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida B.P. 73 CORDEMEX, C.P. 97310, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico b Fundación Dominicana de Estudios Marinos FUNDEMAR, Bayahibe, Dominican Republic c ReefWatch Marine Conservation, Bandra West, Mumbai 400050, India article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Changes in structure and function of coral reefs are increasingly significant and few sites in the Received 18 February 2019 Caribbean can tolerate local and global stress factors. Therefore, we assessed coral reef condition Received in revised form 20 September 2019 indicators in reefs within and outside of MPAs in the southeastern Dominican Republic, considering Accepted 15 October 2019 benthic cover as well as the composition, diversity, recruitment, mortality, bleaching, the conservation Available online 18 October 2019 status and evolutionary distinctiveness of coral species. In general, we found that reef condition Keywords: indicators (coral and benthic cover, recruitment, bleaching, and mortality) within the MPAs showed Coral reefs better conditions than in the unprotected area (Boca Chica). Although the comparison between the Caribbean Boca Chica area and the MPAs may present some spatial imbalance, these zones were chosen for Biodiversity the purpose of making a comparison with a previous baseline presented.
    [Show full text]
  • High Clonality in Acropora Palmata and Acropora Cervicornis Populations of Guadeloupe, French Lesser Antilles
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research Short Communication http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF14181 High clonality in Acropora palmata and Acropora cervicornis populations of Guadeloupe, French Lesser Antilles A. JapaudA, C. BouchonA, J.-L. ManceauA and C. FauvelotB,C AUMR 7208 BOREA, LabEx CORAIL, Universite´ des Antilles et de la Guyane, BP 592, 97159 Pointe-a`-Pitre, Guadeloupe. BUMR 9220 ENTROPIE, LabEx CORAIL, Centre IRD de Noume´a, 101 Promenade Roger Laroque, BPA5, 98848 Noume´a, New Caledonia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Since the 1980s, population densities of Acroporidae have dramatically declined in the Caribbean Sea. Quantitative censuses of Acroporidae provide information on the number of colonies (i.e. ramets), but not on the number of genetically distinct individuals (i.e. genets). In this context, the aim of our study was to provide an overview of the genetic status of Acropora populations in Guadeloupe by examining the genotypic richness of Acropora palmata and Acropora cervicornis. Using 14 microsatellite loci, we found extremely low genotypic richness for both species from Caye-a`-Dupont reef (i.e. 0.125 for A. palmata and nearly zero for A. cervicornis). Because genetic diversity contributes to the ability of organisms to evolve and adapt to new environmental conditions, our results are alarming in the context of ongoing global warming as long periods of clonal growth without sexual recruitment may lead to the extinction of these populations. Additional keywords: genotypic richness, Acroporidae, microsatellites, Caribbean Sea. Received 27 June 2014, accepted 5 November 2014, published online 19 March 2015 Introduction censuses of acroporid densities report on the number of ramets Stony corals of the Acroporidae (Class Anthozoa, Order Scler- (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of CITES Listed Coral Species Part II
    CoP16 Doc. 43.1 (Rev. 1) Annex 5.2 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of CITES listed Coral Species Part II CORAL SPECIES AND SYNONYMS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED IN THE UNEP‐WCMC DATABASE 1. Scleractinia families Family Name Accepted Name Species Author Nomenclature Reference Synonyms ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrolhosensis Veron, 1985 Veron (2000) Madrepora crassa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1860; ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) Veron (2000) Madrepora abrotanoides Lamarck, 1816; Acropora mangarevensis Vaughan, 1906 ACROPORIDAE Acropora aculeus (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora aculeus Dana, 1846 Madrepora acuminata Verrill, 1864; Madrepora diffusa ACROPORIDAE Acropora acuminata (Verrill, 1864) Veron (2000) Verrill, 1864; Acropora diffusa (Verrill, 1864); Madrepora nigra Brook, 1892 ACROPORIDAE Acropora akajimensis Veron, 1990 Veron (2000) Madrepora coronata Brook, 1892; Madrepora ACROPORIDAE Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) Veron (2000) anthocercis Brook, 1893 ACROPORIDAE Acropora arabensis Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora aspera Dana, 1846; Acropora cribripora (Dana, 1846); Madrepora cribripora Dana, 1846; Acropora manni (Quelch, 1886); Madrepora manni ACROPORIDAE Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Quelch, 1886; Acropora hebes (Dana, 1846); Madrepora hebes Dana, 1846; Acropora yaeyamaensis Eguchi & Shirai, 1977 ACROPORIDAE Acropora austera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora austera Dana, 1846 ACROPORIDAE Acropora awi Wallace & Wolstenholme, 1998 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora azurea Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora branchi Riegl, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora brueggemanni Brook, 1891; Isopora ACROPORIDAE Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) Veron (2000) brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bushyensis Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) Acropora fasciculare Latypov, 1992 ACROPORIDAE Acropora cardenae Wells, 1985 Veron (2000) CoP16 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Structure Is Stronger Across Human-Impacted Habitats Than Among Islands in the Coral Porites Lobata
    Genetic structure is stronger across human-impacted habitats than among islands in the coral Porites lobata Kaho H. Tisthammer1,2, Zac H. Forsman3, Robert J. Toonen3 and Robert H. Richmond1 1 Kewalo Marine Laboratory, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America 2 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States of America 3 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Kaneohe, HI, United States of America ABSTRACT We examined genetic structure in the lobe coral Porites lobata among pairs of highly variable and high-stress nearshore sites and adjacent less variable and less impacted offshore sites on the islands of O‘ahu and Maui, Hawai‘i. Using an analysis of molecular variance framework, we tested whether populations were more structured by geographic distance or environmental extremes. The genetic patterns we observed followed isolation by environment, where nearshore and adjacent offshore populations showed significant genetic structure at both locations (AMOVA FST D 0.04∼0.19, P < 0:001), but no significant isolation by distance between islands. Strikingly, corals from the two nearshore sites with higher levels of environmental stressors on different islands over 100 km apart with similar environmentally stressful conditions were genetically closer (FST D 0.0, P D 0.73) than those within a single location less than 2 km apart (FST D 0.04∼0.08, P < 0:01). In contrast, a third site with a less impacted nearshore site (i.e., less pronounced environmental gradient) showed no significant structure from the offshore comparison. Our results show much stronger support for environment than distance separating these populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Hard Coral Recruitment (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) in Colombia
    Universitas Scientiarum, 2011, Vol. 16 N° 3: 200-218 Disponible en línea en: www.javeriana.edu.co/universitas_scientiarum 2011, Vol. 16 N° 3: 200-218 SICI: 2027-1352(201109/12)16:3<200:RHCRCSIC>2.0.TS;2-W Invited review Review on hard coral recruitment (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) in Colombia Alberto Acosta1, Luisa F. Dueñas2, Valeria Pizarro3 1 Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. 2 Laboratorio de Biología Molecular Marina - BIOMMAR, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. 3 Programa de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano. Santa Marta. Colombia. * [email protected] Recibido: 28-02-2011; Aceptado: 11-05-2011 Abstract Recruitment, defined and measured as the incorporation of new individuals (i.e. coral juveniles) into a population, is a fundamental process for ecologists, evolutionists and conservationists due to its direct effect on population structure and function. Because most coral populations are self-feeding, a breakdown in recruitment would lead to local extinction. Recruitment indirectly affects both renewal and maintenance of existing and future coral communities, coral reef biodiversity (bottom-up effect) and therefore coral reef resilience. This process has been used as an indirect measure of individual reproductive success (fitness) and is the final stage of larval dispersal leading to population connectivity. As a result, recruitment has been proposed as an indicator of coral-reef health in marine protected areas, as well as a central aspect of the decision-making process concerning management and conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Survivorship of Scleractinian Coral Transplants And
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Oceanography Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences Speeches, Lectures 2006 Growth and Survivorship of Scleractinian Coral Transplants and the Effectiveness of Plugging Core Holes in Transplant Donor Colonies Elizabeth Glynn Fahy Nova Southeastern University Richard E. Dodge Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Daniel P. Fahy Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] T. Patrick Quinn Nova Southeastern University David S. Gilliam Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation Fahy, Elizabeth Glynn; Dodge, Richard E.; Fahy, Daniel P.; Quinn, T. Patrick; Gilliam, David S.; and Spieler, Richard E., "Growth and Survivorship of Scleractinian Coral Transplants and the Effectiveness of Plugging Core Holes in Transplant Donor Colonies" (2006). Oceanography Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures. Paper 44. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/44 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oceanography Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Elizabeth Glynn Fahy, Richard E. Dodge, Daniel P. Fahy, T. Patrick Quinn, David S. Gilliam, and Richard E. Spieler This conference proceeding is available at NSUWorks: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/44 Growth and survivorship of scleractinian coral transplants and the effectiveness of plugging core holes in transplant donor colonies Elizabeth Glynn FAHY*, Richard E.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Identification of Precious and Semi-Precious Corals in Commercial Trade
    'l'llA FFIC YvALE ,.._,..---...- guide to the identification of precious and semi-precious corals in commercial trade Ernest W.T. Cooper, Susan J. Torntore, Angela S.M. Leung, Tanya Shadbolt and Carolyn Dawe September 2011 © 2011 World Wildlife Fund and TRAFFIC. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-9693730-3-2 Reproduction and distribution for resale by any means photographic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or information storage and retrieval systems of any parts of this book, illustrations or texts is prohibited without prior written consent from World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Reproduction for CITES enforcement or educational and other non-commercial purposes by CITES Authorities and the CITES Secretariat is authorized without prior written permission, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit WWF and TRAFFIC North America. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF, or the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF, TRAFFIC, or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Cooper, E.W.T., Torntore, S.J., Leung, A.S.M, Shadbolt, T. and Dawe, C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reproduction of the Red Sea Coral Stylophora Pistillata
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 1, 133-144, 1979 - Published September 30 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. The Reproduction of the Red Sea Coral Stylophora pistillata. I. Gonads and Planulae B. Rinkevich and Y.Loya Department of Zoology. The George S. Wise Center for Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University. Tel Aviv. Israel ABSTRACT: The reproduction of Stylophora pistillata, one of the most abundant coral species in the Gulf of Eilat, Red Sea, was studied over more than two years. Gonads were regularly examined using histological sections and the planula-larvae were collected in situ with plankton nets. S. pistillata is an hermaphroditic species. Ovaries and testes are situated in the same polyp, scattered between and beneath the septa and attached to them by stalks. Egg development starts in July preceding the spermaria, which start to develop only in October. A description is given on the male and female gonads, their structure and developmental processes. During oogenesis most of the oocytes are absorbed and usually only one oocyte remains in each gonad. S. pistillata broods its eggs to the planula stage. Planulae are shed after sunset and during the night. After spawning, the planula swims actively and changes its shape frequently. A mature planula larva of S. pistillata has 6 pairs of complete mesenteries (Halcampoides stage). However, a wide variability in developmental stages exists in newly shed planulae. The oral pole of the planula shows green fluorescence. Unique organs ('filaments' and 'nodules') are found on the surface of the planula;
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Septal Biomineralization in Scleractinia Compared with Their 28S Rrna Phylogeny
    PBlackwell Publishingatterns Ltd. of septal biomineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a dual approach for a new taxonomic framework JEAN-PIERRE CUIF, GUILLAUME LECOINTRE, CHRISTINE PERRIN, ANNIE TILLIER & SIMON TILLIER Accepted: 2 December 2002 Cuif, J.-P., Lecointre, G., Perrin, C., Tillier, A. & Tillier, S. (2003). Patterns of septal bio- mineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a dual approach for a new taxonomic framework. — Zoologica Scripta, 32, 459–473. A molecular phylogeny of the Scleractinia is reconstructed from approximately 700 nucleo- tides of the 5′end of the 28S rDNA obtained from 40 species. A comparison of molecular phylogenic trees with biomineralization patterns of coral septa suggests that at least five clades are corroborated by both types of data. Agaricidae and Dendrophylliidae are found to be monophyletic, that is supported by microstructural data. Conversely, Faviidae and Caryophyl- liidae are found to be paraphyletic: Cladocora should be excluded from the faviids, whereas Eusmilia should be excluded from the caryophylliids. The conclusion is also supported by the positions, sizes and shapes of centres of calcification. The traditional Guyniidae are diphyletic, corroborating Stolarski’s hypothesis ‘A’. Some results from our most parsimonious trees are not strongly statistically supported but corroborated by other molecular studies and micro- structural observations. For example, in the scleractinian phylogenetic tree, there are several lines of evidence (including those from our data) to distinguish a Faviidae–Mussidae lineage and a Dendrophylliidae–Agaricidae–Poritidae–Siderastreidae lineage. From a methodological standpoint, our results suggest that co-ordinated studies creating links between biomineralization patterns and molecular phylogeny may provide an efficient working approach for a re- examination of scleractinian classification.
    [Show full text]