DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitigation Measures Appendix E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitigation Measures Appendix E Appendix E. Mitigation Measures E-1 Mitigation Measures The following measures should be taken when implementing or performing survey work related to weed management projects. Additional measures for the protection of listed federal and tribal species of concern are available below. General Measures Project Planning Surveys and clearance for cultural resources are required before all surface disturbing activities as outlined in the Programmatic Agreement with the Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department for this plan. Surveys and clearance for paleontological resources are required before all surface disturbing activities. Ethnographic studies are required for non-ground disturbing treatments that use chemicals to document traditional cultural properties, such as culturally important plants or sites within the treatment area as outlined in the Programmatic Agreement with the Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department for this plan. Complete all necessary permits and authorizations prior to implementing a project. All project participants will receive training on the use of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), equipment handling, and safety protocols. Participants will be required to use PPE during herbicide and mechanical (chainsaw, control burn, etc.) applications. If potential habitat for endangered species is present, conduct a habitat assessment by a qualified biologist. If potential habitat is found, the protection measures, including buffers (See Figure E-1 below) established for that species will be applied or additional surveys for the presence of the species will be conducted by a qualified biologist. If the species is present at the site the appropriate species based protection measures will be employed. For all ground-disturbing treatments, as defined by the Programmatic Agreement for this plan, archaeological surveys and ethnographic studies will be conducted by a qualified cultural resource specialist based on the guidelines set forth by the Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department (See Appendix F). Results of the surveys and studies will be used to properly document and preserve cultural resources and to develop appropriate buffer zones to avoid damage, harm, or loss of culturally important plant communities. Prior to Project Implementation Designate staging areas for projects for cleaning and prep work before and after treatments. These sites will be used for mixing herbicides, refueling equipment and E-2 vehicles, and storage for the duration of the treatment. They will be located in upland sites at least 300ft away from surface water or wellheads. Before treatments adjacent landowners, authorized land users, local authorities, and/or the general public will be notified of treatments, treatment duration, and post-treatment measures to prevent exposure and limit re-infestations. This will be done through posted public notices, radio announcements, and/or chapter meeting announcements. Any combination of these methods may be used to help notify the public. Clearly mark boundaries of treatment sites (such as posting visible flags or signage) before and during treatments. For linear treatments, such as along roads or rights-of-way, signs may be posted at either end of the treatment corridor, or on large vehicles performing the treatments. Sites will be inspected and potential hazards will be removed to ensure safety prior to treatments. If treatment areas are in suspected abandoned uranium mining regions, contact the NNEPA Superfund Program for consultation. No treatments will take place within identified abandoned uranium mining areas. If treatment areas are in suspected abandoned uranium mine areas, contact the Navajo EPA Superfund Program for consultation. Treatments shall not take place in areas with active, reclaimed, or abandoned oil, gas, or construction material mines. During Project Implementation All treatments near drinking water wells will implement a ½ mile buffer to prevent contamination. All other wells (i.e. livestock, abandoned, etc.) shall utilize a 100 ft buffer. Vehicles will use only established roads for accessing project sites. Vehicles will be parked at designed parking areas when treating. Parking areas will be near established roadways. When driving on unpaved roads, vehicles should drive at or below 25 mph to reduce dust. If camping at a site is necessary, project participants will use only identified designated and established campsites, where NNHPD or a qualified archeologist has reviewed and approved. On-site safety briefings will be given prior to any treatments to review required PPE, safety and emergency response measures, and what to do in the case of an injury or emergency. To increase treatment effectiveness and limit the spread of invasive weeds at project sites, treatments will start from the perimeter of the infestation and move inward toward the core, unless specific conditions preclude this approach. E-3 Post Project Implementation Equipment, heavy machinery, and clothing will be inspected and cleaned after treatments for mud, dirt, and plant parts to prevent spread to and from other project sites by the field crew. Cleaning can be through use of water to wash equipment or through the use of compressed air or a gravel track pad to remove plant parts from items. Post-treatment monitoring of project sites will be done to evaluate treatment effectiveness, potential re-infestations or new introductions, and potential impacts to resources. Limit the number of people and trips to sensitive areas for follow-up treatments and/or monitoring. Chemical Treatments Project Planning The Certified Pesticide Applicator on site will develop a Spill Contingency Plan that meets the minimum requirements specified by the BIA to eliminate contamination of water or soil resources in the case of accidental spills. For chemical treatments that do not require the use of dyes, an ethnographic survey of project areas, including a 50ft buffer around the main project area, will be conducted to identify the locations and coverage of culturally important plants. Results of the survey will be reviewed by the Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department. Prior to Project Implementation All herbicides must be USEPA approved and must be mixed and applied according to label instructions. Water for mixing herbicide and cleaning herbicide equipment will be potable water obtained off-site. For remote sites, a Water Use Permit must be obtained through the local water code to allow use of nearby surface water. An anti-siphon and back-flow preventer device is required to prevent contamination of the water source. Access to treatment sites should be limited based on the -re-entry time outlined on the herbicide label to limit exposure to humans, livestock, and pets. Sites such as rangelands, fenced sites within Community Development Areas, riparian sites, and farmlands may be closed. Do not directly apply herbicides to open water and use only EPA aquatic-approved herbicides in areas adjacent to open water. Each agency shall be responsible for submitting an eNOI for coverage under the EPA’s Regional Pesticide General Permit permit for all herbicide treatments that may impact water quality. The agency will be responsible for submiting all required reports, plans, notifications, and records related to pesticide use. Navajo Nation EPA Pesticide Program and Water Quality Program shall be notified of all updates and modifications eNOI for E-4 each project using pesticide. To determine if coverage under the Pesticide General Permit is needed, use the U.S. EPA’s Permitting Decision Tool here https://www.epa.gov/npdes/pesticide-applications. Store equipment and materials away from riparian areas in upland sites. No herbicide applications shall be conducted within 24 hours of an expected rain event. Absolutely no applications during periods where water flow is within intermittent streams and/or washes. During Project Implementation All herbicides will be used according to the U.S. EPA approved label. Certified Pesticide Applicators must be on site to supervise projects during herbicide treatments. Pesticide Applicators must hold a valid U.S. EPA Certified Pesticide Applicator in Navajo Indian Country card when using U.S. EPA Restricted Use Pesticides. A current list of Restricted Use Pesticides can be found at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-worker-safety/restricted-use-products-rup-report An emergency spill kit must be present at project sites where herbicide is used to allow for containment, absorption, and disposal of spill materials. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for herbicides and adjuvants must be accessible at project sites in the event of accidental exposure or spill. Avoid using glyphosate formulations that include R-11®, and either avoid using any formulations with POEA or seek to use the formulation with the lowest amount of POEA available to reduce risks to amphibians. Avoid applying chemicals during times of high wind speeds, high temperature, and low humidity to prevent chemical drift to areas off site. Read the herbicide label for exact conditions. For treatments proposed near open water, the following buffers will be used (Figure E-1): o For aquatic approved herbicides – from daily OHWM to 25 ft. o For non-toxic herbicides – 25 ft from the OHWM o For moderately to highly toxic herbicides – 300ft buffer E-5 Figure E-1. Diagram showing buffers required for herbicides used under the Proposed Alternative. For treatments around culturally important plants, appropriate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paleontological Resources of the Upper and Middle San Pedro Valley
    Paleontological Resources of the Upper and Middle San Pedro Valley Robert D. McCord Arizona Museum of Natural History Geological setting Regional extension causing block faulting – creation of the Basin and Range ~15Ma Poorly developed drainage results in lakes in valley bottom ?-3.4 Ma Drainage develops with flow to north, marshes, ponds and lakes significant from time to time Early Pleistocene Saint David Formation ? – 3.4 million lakes, few fossils Well developed paleomagnetic timeframe – a first for terrestrial sediments! Succession of faunas from ~3 to 1.5 Ma Blancan to ? Irvingtonian NALMA Plants diatoms charophytes Equisetum (scouring rush) Ostracoda (aquatic crustaceans) Cypridopsis cf. vidua Limnocythere cf. staplini Limnocythere sp. Candona cf. renoensis Candona sp. A Candona sp. B ?Candonlella sp. ?Heterocypris sp. ?Cycloypris sp. Potamocypris sp. Cyprideis sp. Darwinula sp. Snails and a Clam Pisidium casertanum (clam) Fossaria dalli (aquatic snail) Lymnaea caperata (aquatic snail) Lymnaea cf. elodes (aquatic snail) Bakerilymnaea bulimoides (aquatic snail) Gyraulus parvus (aquatic snail) Promenetus exacuous (aquatic snail) Promenetus umbilicatellus (aquatic snail) Physa virgata (aquatic snail) Gastrocopta cristata (terrestrial snail) Gastrocopta tappaniana (terrestrial snail) Pupoides albilabris (terrestrial snail) Vertigo milium (terrestrial snail) Vertigo ovata (terrestrial snail) cf. Succinea (terrestrial snail) Deroceras aenigma (slug) Hawaila minuscula (terrestrial snail) Fish and Amphibians indeterminate small fish Ambystoma tigrinum (tiger salamander) Scaphiopus hammondi (spadefoot toad) Bufo alvarius (toad) Hyla eximia (tree frog) Rana sp. (leopard frog) Turtles and Lizards Kinosternon arizonense (mud turtle) Terrapene cf. ornata (box turtle) Gopherus sp. (tortoise) Hesperotestudo sp. (giant tortoise) Eumeces sp. (skink) “Cnemidophorus” sp. (whiptail lizard) Crotaphytus sp. (collared lizard) Phrynosoma sp. (horned lizard) Sceloporus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology and Diet of the Ferruginous Hawk in South Dakota
    Wilson Bull., 94(l), 1982, pp. 4654 BREEDING BIOLOGY AND DIET OF THE FERRUGINOUS HAWK IN SOUTH DAKOTA CHARLES L. BLAIR AND FRANK SCHITOSKEY, JR. The Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) is the largest North American buteo. It occurs throughout most of the western United States and breeds from Alberta to western Texas and from Washington to Arizona. In this study we investigated the breeding biology of the Ferruginous Hawks in northwest South Dakota, complimenting earlier studies by Weston (1969) in Utah, Olendorff (1973) in Colorado, Howard (1975) in Utah and Idaho, and Lokemoen and Duebbert (1976) in north-central South Dakota. STUDY AREA AND METHODS The study area encompassed about 7000 km ’ in northwest South Dakota, including all of Harding County. The area is semi-arid and has a mid-continental climate with long, cold winters and short, warm summers (Spuhler et al. 1971). Eighty-five percent of Harding County is rangeland dominated by western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii) and needle grass (Stipa comata). Sagebrush (Artemesia spp.) occurs throughout the area and is widespread in the western third of the county. Small grain crops compose 9% of the area, pastureland and tame hay 3% and woodland 3%. Elevated table lands are dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinw ponderma) Savannah, whereas green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanicas), willow (S&x spp.) and Siberian elm (Ulmas pumila) predominate in riparian areas and ravines. Two or more biologists conducted a daily census of birds on the study area in 1976 and 1977; Ferruginous Hawk studies began the day the first hawk was sighted. Active nests were located either during aerial surveys at altitudes of 150-175 m, or by ground searches from roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Kangaroo Rat and Pocket Mouse
    Shrew Family Order Rodentia (Soricoidae) masked shrew vagrant shrew water shrew Sorex cinereus Sorex vagrans Sorex palustris grassland streambank streambank Mouse, Vole, Rats, and Muskrat (Cricetidae) meadow vole long-tailed vole heather vole Microtus pennsylvanicu Microtus longicaudus Phenacomys intermedius grassland streambank streambank/grassland/mountain Gapper’s red-backed vole deer mouse Western harvest mouse Clethrionomys gapperi Peromycus maniculatus Reithrodontomys megalotis mountain mountain/streambank grassland bushy-tailed woodrat Neotoma cinerea mountain rock mouse Northern grasshopper mouse Peromyscus difficilis Onychomys leucogaster mountain grassland Jumping Mouse Kangaroo Rat and Family Pocket Mouse silky pocket mouse (Zapodidae) (Heteromyidae) Perognathus flavus desert Western jumping mouse Ord’s kangaroo rat Apache pocket mouse Zapus princeps Dipodomys ordii Perognathus apache streambank desert mountain 1:1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches 1 - Rodents Tracks are actual size. Pocket Gopher Porcupine Family Order Rodentia Family (Erethizonidae) (Geomyidae) Beaver Family (Castoridae) porcupine Erethizon dorsatum mountains/grasslands scale 1:3 beaver Castor canadensis streams/lakes/wetlands Northern pocket gopher scale 1:3 Thomomys talpoides grasslands scale 1:1 1:3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches Squirrel Family (Sciuridae) least chipmunk Colorado chipmunk chicaree Eutamias minimus Eutamias quadrivittatus Tamiasciurus douglassi mountain/grassland mountain forest Abert’s squirrel Sciurus aberti kaibabensis mountain/forest rock ground squirrel golden-mantled ground Spermophilus variegatus squirrel mountain Spermophilus lateralis streambank yellow-bellied marmot Gunnison’s prairie dog thirteen-lined ground squirrel Marmota flaviventris Cynomys gunnisoni Spermophilus tridecemlineatus mountain/rockslide grassland grassland 1:1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches 2 - Rodents Rodentia tracks vary in size. Sciuridae tracks are actual size.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaetodipus Baileyi) and the Peromyscus Eremicus Species Group: Historical Vicariance of the Baja California Peninsular Desert Brett R
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 17, No. 2, November, pp. 161–172, 2000 doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0842, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Comparative Phylogeography of Baileys’ Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi) and the Peromyscus eremicus Species Group: Historical Vicariance of the Baja California Peninsular Desert Brett R. Riddle,* David J. Hafner,† and Lois F. Alexander* *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada at Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4004; and †New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104 Received October 13, 1999; revised July 24, 2000 Nelson and E. A. Goldman surveyed the Peninsula on Phylogenetic analysis of 699 bp of the mitochondrial horseback for the U. S. Bureau of Biological Survey in DNA (mtDNA) COIII and 450 bp of the cytochrome b 1905 and 1906 (Nelson, 1921). Huey (1964) provided a genes among 14 species of coarse-haired pocket mice description of the Peninsula’s mammals as of 1960, and (Heteromyidae: Chaetodipus) corroborated previous a general description of the mammalian biogeography indications that genetic divergence between species of the region by Orr (1960) was followed by more de- and species groups within the genus is generally very tailed analyses of the ecological (Lawlor, 1983a,b) and high, suggesting old times of divergence, and that the historical biogeography of the mammals of the Penin- nominal species C. baileyi represents a highly diver- sular mainland and surrounding islands (Hafner and gent lineage within the genus, with no closely related Riddle, 1997). In concert with these studies have been extant sister species.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Owl Symposium Importance of Prairie
    2nd Owl Symposium Importance of Prairie Wetlands and Avian Prey to Breeding Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) in Northwestern North Dakota Robert K. Murphy 1 Abstract.—Prey use by Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) is documented widely in North America, but not in the vast northern Great Plains. During spring through early summer 1986-1987, I recorded 2,900 prey items at 22 Great Horned Owl nesting areas in the prairie pothole farm- and rangelands of northwestern North Dakota. The owls relied heavily on wetland-dependent prey species (overall, 57 percent by number and 76 percent biomass) especially ducks (Anserinae) and rails (Rallidae). Far more avian (65 percent by number and 84 percent biomass) and less mammalian prey were used than typically reported. Variation in diet composition among owl families was not explained well by nesting area habitat, and was dominated by prey from wetlands regardless of wetland habitat availability. Diets of Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) (Murphy 1993, Sargeant et al. 1993). The are better documented than those of most increase in this generalist predator may have other North American strigiforms. The owl implications for population dynamics of species preys mainly on small to mid-size mammals on which it preys. My objectives were to quan- especially small rodents and leporids tify diet composition of breeding Great Horned (Errington et al. 1940; Korschgen and Stuart Owls in an area of mixed farm- and rangeland 1972; McInvaille and Keith 1974; Marti and in the northern Great Plains, to assess varia- Kochert 1995, 1996; Voous 1988) although its tion in prey use among owl pairs, and to test list of prey includes diverse sizes and taxa (see whether such variation is explained by habitat Bent 1938).
    [Show full text]
  • A Mast-Seeding Desert Shrub Regulates Population Dynamics and Behavior of Its Heteromyid Dispersers Janene Auger1,†, Susan E
    A mast-seeding desert shrub regulates population dynamics and behavior of its heteromyid dispersers Janene Auger1,†, Susan E. Meyer2 & Stephen H. Jenkins3 1Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 2USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah 84606 3Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 Keywords Abstract Blackbrush, Coleogyne ramosissima, Dipodomys ordii, interference competition, Granivorous rodent populations in deserts are primarily regulated through pre- kangaroo rat, optimal caching theory, cipitation-driven resource pulses rather than pulses associated with mast-seed- Perognathus flavescens, pocket mouse, ing, a pattern more common in mesic habitats. We studied heteromyid resource abundance hypothesis, responses to mast-seeding in the desert shrub blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosis- scatterhoarding. sima), a regionally dominant species in the Mojave–Great Basin Desert transi- tion zone. In a 5-year study at Arches National Park, Utah, USA, we quantified Correspondence spatiotemporal variation in seed resources in mast and intermast years in black- Susan Meyer, USFS Shrub Sciences Laboratory, 735 North 500 East, Provo, UT brush-dominated and mixed desert vegetation and measured responses of 84606. Dipodomys ordii (Ord’s kangaroo rat) and Perognathus flavescens (plains pocket Tel: 801 356 5122; mouse). In blackbrush-dominated vegetation, blackbrush seeds comprised Fax: 801 375 6968; >79% of seed production in a mast year, but 0% in the first postmast year. E-mail: [email protected] Kangaroo rat abundance in blackbrush-dominated vegetation was highest in the mast year, declined sharply at the end of the first postmast summer, and then Present address remained at low levels for 3 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Mammals of White Sands
    National Park Service White Sands Department of the Interior White Sands National Monument Common Mammals of White Sands NPS historic photo of a coyote catching a mouse hile visiting White Sands National Monument, it is very unlikely that Wyou will see any of our resident mammals. They have adapted to the hot summers of the Tularosa Basin by hiding in their dens until it cools down, leaving behind only their footprints from their nightly hunting. Pallid bats can be found roosting in their food on the ground while many areas, such as the visitor center. walking around. Their large ears They are identified by their large ears help them to hear their prey’s and light-colored fur. These winged footsteps. They eat insects like mammals can eat insects in the air scorpions and crickets, but also like other bats, but locate most of lizards and rodents. Pallid Bat Antozous pallidus The Apache pocket mouse is an helps it blend with the sand. It is endemic subspecies to White Sands a favorite snack of the kit fox. The and is one of the few residents of the Apache pocket mouse extracts dunes. It is named for the large fur all of its water from the food it lined pockets in their cheeks that hold digests. It can go its entire life hundreds of seeds when the mouse without ever drinking water. forages. It is light in coloration, which Apache Pocket Mouse Perognathus flavescens Apachii The kangaroo rat has a few tricks monument, the kangaroo rat is 13 to help escape predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Nesting of Ferrginous Hawks (Buteo Regalis) in Washington 1974-75
    NESTING OF FERRUGINOUS HAWKS (BUTEO REGALIS) IN WASHINGTON 197475 R. E. FITZNER D. BERRY L. L. BOYD AND C. A. RIECK The first comprehensive study of the Ferru- excluding the Blue Mountains. The natural vegeta- ginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) in Washington tion of the study area is classified as steppe (Daub- enmire 1970) and lies in the rain-shadow of the was conducted by Bowles and Decker (1931), Cascade Mountains. Most of the native vegetation who described nests, clutch sizes, food habits, of the basin has been either destroyed by cultivation interspecific relations, and habitat utilization, and water impoundment, or greatly modified by fire Angel1 (1969) provided a further report con- and livestock grazing. Much of the unmodified area cerning the behavior of one pair of nesting is channeled scabland, formed when glacial floods bared large tracts of basalt, and scoured canyons and birds. deep valleys (U.S. Dept. Interior 1973). Since the Bowles and Decker (1931) study, A small portion of the study area, approximately the lands of eastern Washington have under- 117 km* in southern Franklin Co., consists of glacio- gone a tremendous change, resulting from fluvial deposits of sand. The unique feature of this area is the presence of western junipers (juniperus intensive dryland wheat farming, irrigation, occidentalis) which form savannahs of variable size water diversion and impoundment, and urban separated by tracts of moving sand dunes. These sprawl. The Washington Department of trees are apparently at the northernmost limit of Game has been concerned about the impact their range in North America (Vasek 1966). We these land changes are having on native wild- found that the channeled scablands and juniper- Savannah areas were the principal habitats used for life species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis and Use of Methodologies for the Study of the Diets of Long-Eared Owls from Three Environments in North Central Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1985 The analysis and use of methodologies for the study of the diets of long-eared owls from three environments in north central Oregon John M. Barss Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Biology Commons, Nutrition Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Barss, John M., "The analysis and use of methodologies for the study of the diets of long-eared owls from three environments in north central Oregon" (1985). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3437. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF John M. Barss for the Master of Science in Biology presented May 15, 1985. Title: The Analysis and Use of Methodologies for the Study of the Diets of Long-eared Owls From Three Environments in North-central Oregon. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Richard B. Forbes Robert O. Tinnin Part I of this study presents a procedure for standardization of pellet analysis methodologies which improves estimation of prey biomass and determines the number of pellets needed to estimate prey diversity indices. The procedure was developed to provide a simple, easily replicated methodology for the study of pellets which also retains maximal data recorded from pellet analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteromyidae)
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2003 Evolutionary and biogeographic histories in a North American rodent family (Heteromyidae) Lois Fay Alexander University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Alexander, Lois Fay, "Evolutionary and biogeographic histories in a North American rodent family (Heteromyidae)" (2003). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2561. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/g45f-ub85 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. EVOLUTIONARY AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC HISTORIES IN A NORTH AMERICAN RODENT FAMILY (HETEROMYIDAE) by Lois Fay Alexander Bachelor of Science Oregon State University, Corvallis 1990 Master of Science Oregon State University, Corvallis 1994 A thesis submitted in partial fialfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biological Sciences Department of Biological Sciences College of Sciences Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Olive-Backed Pocket Mouse Perognathus Fasciatus
    Wyoming Species Account Olive-backed Pocket Mouse Perognathus fasciatus REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: No special status USFS R2: No special status UWFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Nongame Wildlife CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Cb), Tier III WYNDD: G5, S3S5 Wyoming contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS Olive-backed Pocket Mouse (Perognathus fasciatus) is assigned a range of state conservation ranks by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD) due to uncertainty concerning the abundance, population trends, amount of occupied habitat, and extent of extrinsic stressors in Wyoming. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: Olive-backed Pocket Mouse is a member of the family Heteromyidae, which includes the pocket mice and kangaroo rats 1. There are two recognized subspecies of P. fasciatus, both of which are found in Wyoming: P. f. callistus occupies southwestern Wyoming, while P. f. fasciatus is found in the eastern two-thirds of the state 2, 3. There is no apparent barrier between the distributions of these two subspecies, suggesting the potential for introgression. A recent genetic analysis confirms that P. fasciatus is distinct from other, geographically proximate Perognathus species, but does not further resolve subspecific designations 4. Description: Olive-backed Pocket Mouse, like other pocket mice, is a small-bodied rodent with a relatively long tail and visible, external, fur-lined cheek pouches. Dorsal pelage of Olive-backed Pocket Mouse is generally olivaceous, being darker in the northeast portion of its range (i.e., P. f. fasciatus) and more buffy in the southwest (i.e., P. f.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of the Olive-Backed Pocket Mouse, Perognathus Fasciatus (Rodentia, Heteromyidae) Daniel F
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska State Museum 3-6-1979 A Systematic Review of the Olive-Backed Pocket Mouse, Perognathus fasciatus (Rodentia, Heteromyidae) Daniel F. Williams California State University - Stanislaus Hugh H. Genoways University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Williams, Daniel F. and Genoways, Hugh H., "A Systematic Review of the Olive-Backed Pocket Mouse, Perognathus fasciatus (Rodentia, Heteromyidae)" (1979). Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum. 213. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy/213 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Williams and Genoways in Annals of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (March 6, 1979) 48 (article 5). Copyright 1979, Carnegie Museum. Used by permission. ISSN 0097-4463 ANNALS of CARN EGIE MUSEUM CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 4400 FORBES AVENUE • PITTSBURCH, PENNSYLVANIA 15213 VOLUME 48 6 MARCH 1979 ARTICLE 5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE OLIVE-BACKED POCKET MOUSE, PEROGNATHUS FASCIATUS (RODENTIA, HETEROMYIDAE) DANIEL F. WILLIAMS! Post-doctoral Fellow , Section of Mammals HUGH H. GENOWAYS Curator, Section of Mammals ABSTRACT Geographic variation in Perognathus fa scia/us Wied and the identities of specimens of P. fa sciatus and P.
    [Show full text]