The Colbert Report and Its Nation As Critical and Productive Commodities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Colbert Report and Its Nation As Critical and Productive Commodities The Colbert Report and Its Nation as Critical and Productive Commodities Critical Cultural Discourse and Political Economy Analysis of Satire and Fan Culture to Review Dallas Smythe Research Master in Media Studies Dissertation Name: Pauline Le E-mail addresses: [email protected] [email protected] Student number: 6075665 Supervisor: Jan Teurlings Second reader: Markus Stauff Third reader: Jaap Kooijman Master: Research Master in Media Studies Department: Graduate School of Humanities University: University of Amsterdam Word Count: 19.014 Date: August 14th, 2014 Abstract In “Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism” (1977), political economist Dallas Smythe laid out the theoretical framework for the North American tradition/field of the political economy of media and communications. Being interested in the media industry as a capitalist system within a capitalist society, he convincingly argued that the content of media are ‘free lunch’ and that media audiences are produced as audience commodities for advertisers to buy and sell. His work is still being cited and revised today. This current study expands and problematises Smythe's two main claims about media content and media audiences by looking into The Colbert Report (Comedy Central, 2005-present) as a political satire in the context of the culture war and the 24- hour news media culture, and as a television program with a dedicated fan following. In engaging with Smythe's theory, the paradoxes of the genre of satire and fan culture within capitalist society come to the fore. On the one hand, satire and fans desire to be critical and/or productive; on the other hand, they are part of a capitalist television industry undermining that desire. This study exemplifies how this paradox presents itself in the relation between the program content, producer and fan of satire. It extends political economy analysis and television studies by examining satire and the on-screen fan practices: political activism, fan charity and fanvidding. In solving this paradox, this thesis proposes that The Colbert Report and Its Nation are critical and productive commodities. That is, both the show and the fans are required to be commodified in order to be critical and productive within and outside of the capitalist system. This study demonstrates how they reinforce and critique the political economic logic of American cable television as they function as sites of struggle between critique, productivity and commodity. Keywords: political economy of television, Dallas Smythe, free lunch, audience commodity, audience labour, The Colbert Report, satire, critique, culture war, fan productivity 2 Acknowledgments Starting with Late Night with Conan O'Brien (1993-2009), American late-night comedy television programs have been a hobby horse of mine since I was fifteen. My academic trajectory at the University of Amsterdam (Media en cultuur and the Research Master in Media Studies) has thought me many things. The fact that I managed to apply the acquired knowledge and skills to write about one of my favourite late night shows, The Colbert Report (2005-present), as topic of both my bachelor and now my master thesis is beyond belief. Whereas for my bachelor thesis I mainly focused on the textual practices of satire, for my master thesis I broadened the scope by paying attention to the production and reception practices as well. I thank my supervisor dr. Jan Teurlings for having the patience to deal with me the last couple of months. His guidance was unquestionably essential to my writing. I also thank my two thesis readers dr. Markus Stauff and dr. Jaap Kooijman. My thanks to my fellow rMA Media Studies students and professors for their critical assistance and feedback. Finally, my gratitude goes toward my friends and family. Their support, albeit surely dubious at times, gave me the strength to always look forward and keep moving. 3 Table of Contents Abstract..............................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................3 1 Introduction................................................................................................................5 2 Dallas Smythe's Theory...........................................................................................10 2.1 Media/Television Programming as Free Lunch...............................................11 2.2 Audience Commodity......................................................................................15 2.2.1 Audience Labour......................................................................................17 2.3 Existing Expansions and Critiques on Smythe................................................17 2.3.1 “Watching Is Labour” and the Attention Economy.................................19 2.3.2 Audience Labour in Contemporary Media Culture..................................20 3 The Colbert Report..................................................................................................24 3.1 Free Lunch versus Satire as Critical Content...................................................24 3.1.1 Defining Satire..........................................................................................26 3.1.1.1 Satire as Dominant Reading.............................................................28 3.1.2 Culture Wars in Contemporary News and Media Culture.......................29 3.1.3 Satire in Contemporary News and Media Culture...................................32 3.2 Audience Commodity versus ‘Productive Commodity’ .................................35 3.2.1 Smythe on Contemporary Media Fan Practices.......................................37 3.2.2 Fandom: To the Colbert Nation and Beyond...........................................38 3.2.2.1 The Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear...........................................42 3.2.2.2 Fan Charity.......................................................................................45 3.2.2.3 Remix Culture...................................................................................47 3.2.3 The Paradox of Satire and Fan Culture....................................................50 4 Conclusion...............................................................................................................53 References.......................................................................................................................57 4 1 Introduction Published in the first issue of the Canadian Journal of Political and Society Theory in 1977, political economist Dallas Smythe (1907-1992) wrote an article titled “Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism.” In it, he put forward two claims about media content and media audiences. According to him, the economic and political significance of media is more important than any political and cultural meaning in media (1). Under monopoly capitalism, media function with economic goals in mind. Two main points that derive out of this conception were: first, that media/television programming is to be considered as ‘free lunch,’ and second, that audiences and readerships of media are produced as ratings for sale to advertisers and thus are commodities (3). According to Smythe, cultural criticism and ideology play a lesser part in media. The labour and time that the audience put into watching television is what Smythe calls audience labour understood as a form of exploitation of the audience. The intent of this thesis is to expand Smythe's essay by simultaneously strengthening and critiquing his claims. This thesis demonstrates that while Smythe's political economic theory in the context of monopoly capitalism has valid points, he does not leave room for nuances that are intrinsically part of contemporary media culture and thus relevant to call attention to. The Colbert Report (Comedy Central, 2005-present; TCR) as a satire and a TV show with a dedicated fan culture asks for a review of Smythe's essay. Focussing on this American satirical television news program, this dissertation shows how the genre of satire and fan culture help to identify overseen gaps in Smythe's ideas of free lunch and audience commodity. Indeed, TCR is a television show that is part of a money-making industry. As such, the genre of satire is to be perceived as yet another cog of a greater machinery. Furthermore, the show is produced to stimulate audience productivity – be it intentional or unintentional. That is, the fans offer labour and participate in events that are related to the show. This notion helps to strengthen the understanding of fans as audience commodity. The arguments here are that content in media does matter to a certain extent and audiences are to be see as ‘productive commodities.’ First, satire plays a role in a particular form of ideology that is not the same kind of ideology in the capitalist system that Smythe had in mind. Second, the fans of TCR – also known by the names names 5 varying from the Colbert Nation to Nation to Heroes – accurately fit the description of audience commodity, yet, at the same time, transcend it. In scrutinising Smythe's theory, this dissertation allow for a way to rethink the positions of the genre of satire and fan culture within today's mainstream television. Many theorists have and are still discussing Smythe's text in length (i.e. Jhally & Livant 1986, 2006; Fuchs and Caraway). A great deal has been written about
Recommended publications
  • Colbert Super PAC - 1
    Colbert Super PAC - 1 Stephen Colbert’s Civics Lesson: How Colbert Super PAC Taught Viewers about Campaign Finance By Bruce W. Hardy Jeffrey A. Gottfried Kenneth M. Winneg & Kathleen Hall Jamieson Colbert Super PAC - 2 Stephen Colbert’s Civics Lesson: How Colbert Super PAC Taught Viewers about Campaign Finance Abstract This study tests whether exposure to The Colbert Report influenced knowledge of super PACs and 501(c)(4) groups, and ascertains how having such knowledge influenced viewers’ perceptions about the role of money in politics. Our analysis of a national random sample of adults interviewed after the 2012 presidential election found that viewing The Colbert Report both increased peoples’ perception of how knowledgeable they were about super PACs and 501(c)(4) groups and increased actual knowledge of campaign finance regulation regarding these independent expenditure groups. Findings suggest that the political satirist was more successful in informing his viewers about super PACs and 501(c)(4) groups than were other types of news media. Viewing The Colbert Report also indirectly influenced how useful his audience perceived money to be in politics. Colbert Super PAC - 3 Stephen Colbert’s Civics Lesson: How Colbert Super PAC Taught Viewers about Campaign Finance After faux-right-wing satirist Stephen Colbert signed control of his super PAC “Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow” over to his Comedy Central colleague and Daily Show host Jon Stewart and, in the process, renamed it “The Definitely Not Coordinating with Stephen Colbert Super PAC,” the comic announced his candidacy for “President of the United States of South Carolina.” Some scholars characterized these moments of Colbert’s direct engagement with post-Citizens United campaign finance laws as “commentary that is entertaining and ironic, yet also critically serious” (Jones, Baym, & Day, 2012, p.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2021 Amazon Warehouse Workers In
    February 26, 2021 Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer, Alabama are voting to form a union with the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU). We are the writers of feature films and television series. All of our work is done under union contracts whether it appears on Amazon Prime, a different streaming service, or a television network. Unions protect workers with essential rights and benefits. Most importantly, a union gives employees a seat at the table to negotiate fair pay, scheduling and more workplace policies. Deadline Amazon accepts unions for entertainment workers, and we believe warehouse workers deserve the same respect in the workplace. We strongly urge all Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer to VOTE UNION YES. In solidarity and support, Megan Abbott (DARE ME) Chris Abbott (LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE; CAGNEY AND LACEY; MAGNUM, PI; HIGH SIERRA SEARCH AND RESCUE; DR. QUINN, MEDICINE WOMAN; LEGACY; DIAGNOSIS, MURDER; BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL; YOUNG AND THE RESTLESS) Melanie Abdoun (BLACK MOVIE AWARDS; BET ABFF HONORS) John Aboud (HOME ECONOMICS; CLOSE ENOUGH; A FUTILE AND STUPID GESTURE; CHILDRENS HOSPITAL; PENGUINS OF MADAGASCAR; LEVERAGE) Jay Abramowitz (FULL HOUSE; GROWING PAINS; THE HOGAN FAMILY; THE PARKERS) David Abramowitz (HIGHLANDER; MACGYVER; CAGNEY AND LACEY; BUCK JAMES; JAKE AND THE FAT MAN; SPENSER FOR HIRE) Gayle Abrams (FRASIER; GILMORE GIRLS) 1 of 72 Jessica Abrams (WATCH OVER ME; PROFILER; KNOCKING ON DOORS) Kristen Acimovic (THE OPPOSITION WITH JORDAN KLEPPER) Nick Adams (NEW GIRL; BOJACK HORSEMAN;
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY 2002 DirecTV DSL “End of the Internet” Commercial. Accessed March 5, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch? v5_uXtWIg_A7M. Adorno, Theodor W. “The Form of the Phonograph Record.” In Essays on Music/Theodor W. Adorno, edited by Theodor W. Adorno, Richard D. Leppert, and Susan H. Gillespie, 277–80. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. Agger, Ben. Fast Capitalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988. Agger, Ben. Speeding Up Fast Capitalism: Cultures, Jobs, Families, Schools, Bodies. Boulder: Routledge, 2004. Agger, Ben. Oversharing: Presentations of Self in the Internet Age. New York: Routledge, 2011. Aglietta, Michel. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. Translated by David Fernbach. New edition. New York: Verso, 2001. Allen, Jennifer. “How Episode Became the World’s Biggest Interactive Fiction Platform.” Accessed August 7, 2020. https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/293928/How_Episode_ became_the_worlds_biggest_interactive_fiction_platform.php. 151 152 Bibliography Andrejevic, Mark. Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2013. Arditi, David. “Billboard Plays Catch-up to YouTube’s Dominance.” The Tennessean. March 9, 2020, Online edition, sec. Opinion. https://www.tennessean.com/story/ opinion/2020/03/09/billboard-catches-up-to-youtube- dominance/5005889002/. Arditi, David. Criminalizing Independent Music: The Recording Industry Association of America’s Advancement of Dominant Ideology. VDM Verlag, 2007. Arditi, David. “Downloading Is Killing Music: The Recording Industry’s Piracy Panic Narrative.” Edited by Victor Sarafian and Rosemary Findley. Civilisations, The State of the Music Industry, 63, no. 1 (July 2014): 13–32. Arditi, David. ITake-Over: The Recording Industry in the Digital Era.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Colbert's Super PAC and the Growing Role of Comedy in Our
    STEPHEN COLBERT’S SUPER PAC AND THE GROWING ROLE OF COMEDY IN OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE BY MELISSA CHANG, SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS ADVISER: CHRIS EDELSON, PROFESSOR IN THE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS UNIVERSITY HONORS IN CLEG SPRING 2012 Dedicated to Professor Chris Edelson for his generous support and encouragement, and to Professor Lauren Feldman who inspired my capstone with her course on “Entertainment, Comedy, and Politics”. Thank you so, so much! 2 | C h a n g STEPHEN COLBERT’S SUPER PAC AND THE GROWING ROLE OF COMEDY IN OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE Abstract: Comedy plays an increasingly legitimate role in the American political discourse as figures such as Stephen Colbert effectively use humor and satire to scrutinize politics and current events, and encourage the public to think more critically about how our government and leaders rule. In his response to the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) and the rise of Super PACs, Stephen Colbert has taken the lead in critiquing changes in campaign finance. This study analyzes segments from The Colbert Report and the Colbert Super PAC, identifying his message and tactics. This paper aims to demonstrate how Colbert pushes political satire to new heights by engaging in real life campaigns, thereby offering a legitimate voice in today’s political discourse. INTRODUCTION While political satire is not new, few have mastered this art like Stephen Colbert, whose originality and influence have catapulted him to the status of a pop culture icon. Never breaking character from his zany, blustering persona, Colbert has transformed the way Americans view politics by using comedy to draw attention to important issues of the day, critiquing and unpacking these issues in a digestible way for a wide audience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC
    The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC Financing and Independent Expenditures Paul S. Herrnson University of Connecticut [email protected] Presented at the Meeting of the Campaign Finance Task Force, Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, April 21, 2017 (revised June 2017). 1 Exe cutive Summa ry Super PACs have grown in number, wealth, and influence since the Supreme Court laid the foundation for their formation in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the decisions reached by other courts and the FEC clarified the boundaries of their political participation. Their objectives and activities also have evolved. Super PACs are not nearly as monolithic as they have been portrayed by the media. While it is inaccurate to characterize them as representative of American society, it is important to recognize that they vary in wealth, mission, structure, affiliation, political perspective, financial transparency, and how and where they participate in political campaigns. Organizational characteristics influence super PAC financing, including the sums they raise. Organizational characteristics also affect super PAC independent expenditures, including the amounts spent, the elections in which they are made, the candidates targeted, and the tone of the messages delivered. The super PAC community is not static. It is likely to continue to evolve in response to legal challenges; regulatory decisions; the objectives of those who create, administer, and finance them; and changes in the broader political environment. 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Data and Methods 4 III. Emergence and Development 7 IV. Organizational Characteristics 11 A. Finances 11 B. Mission 14 C. Affiliation 17 D. Financial Transparency 19 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter-2013.Pdf
    Alumni Gazette WEStern’S ALUMNI MAGAZINE SINCE 1939 WINTER 2013 Power player TTC Chair Karen Stintz Alumni Gazette CONTENTS See public health from SAGT YIN on track 12 Karen Stintz, BA’92, Dipl’93, Chair of TTC a new vantage point STA Y THIRSTY 14 FOR ADVENTURE John Marcus Payne, LLB’73, has almost done it all OSCAR WINNER FIRST 16 MUSIC HALL OF FAMER Composer Barbara Willis Sweet, BMus’75 STOPPING YOUR OWN 18 GLOBAL WARMING Cardiologist & author Bradley J. Dibble, MD’90 W RITING code for 20 WEBSITES is fun? Web designer Amanda Aitken, BA’05, Cert’05 WHO IS WATCHING 26 THE POLICE? Director of Ontario’s SIU Ian Scott, LLB’81 NO JOKE: FAILURE CAN 30 LEAD TO SUCCESS Comedian and writer Deepak Sethi, BSc’02 The new Master of Public Health. 26 Get ready to lead. DEPARTMENTS @ alumnigazette.ca LETTERS CONSUMER GUIDE 05 Impressed by student spirit 28 Top 5 wines to drink now at Homecoming MAKING THE FRENCH CONNECTION BEST KEPT SECRET P URSUING JOINT PHD LIFE-ALTERING CAMPUS NEWS 32 Famous signatures in Western EXPERIENCE for KristEN SNELL, BSC’09, 07 Clinical trials of AIDS vaccine Archives MSC’11 making progress THE ROAD TO HOLLYWOOD NEW RELEASES Q & A WITH COMEDY WRITER DEEPAK SETHI, 36 Save the Humans by Rob CAMPUS QUOTES BSC’02 09 Western hosts guest speakers Stewart, BSc’01 A CAREER OF PERSISTANCE MEMORIES GAZETTEER AN EXpaNDED story ON DR. Masashi • 12 months full-time APPLY NOW • Deadline March 1 22 Winter Carnival on UC Hill 41 Alumni notes & Kawasaki, BA’53, MD’57 • intensive case-based learning schulich.uwo.ca/publichealth announcements SAVE THE HUMANS – EXCERPT • interdisciplinary faculty BY ROB STEWART, BSC’01 • 12-week practicum On the cover: Karen Stintz, BA’92, Dipl’93 (Political Science, King’s) is chair of the Toronto • international field trip Transit Commission (TTC).
    [Show full text]
  • Television Satire and Discursive Integration in the Post-Stewart/Colbert Era
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2017 On with the Motley: Television Satire and Discursive Integration in the Post-Stewart/Colbert Era Amanda Kay Martin University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Amanda Kay, "On with the Motley: Television Satire and Discursive Integration in the Post-Stewart/ Colbert Era. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4759 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Amanda Kay Martin entitled "On with the Motley: Television Satire and Discursive Integration in the Post-Stewart/Colbert Era." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Communication and Information. Barbara Kaye, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Mark Harmon, Amber Roessner Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) On with the Motley: Television Satire and Discursive Integration in the Post-Stewart/Colbert Era A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Amanda Kay Martin May 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Amanda Kay Martin All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Editors Ece KARADOĞAN DORUK, Seda MENGÜ, Ebru ULUSOY
    DIGITAL SIEGE Editors Ece KARADOĞAN DORUK, Seda MENGÜ, Ebru ULUSOY DIGITAL SEIGE EDITORS Ece KARADOĞAN DORUK Istanbul University, Faculty of Communication, Istanbul, Turkey Seda MENGÜ Istanbul University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey Ebru ULUSOY Farmingdale State College, New York, USA Published by Istanbul University Press Istanbul University Central Campus IUPress Office, 34452 Beyazıt/Fatih Istanbul - Turkey www.iupress.istanbul.edu.tr Digital Seige Editors: Ece Karadoğan Doruk, Seda Mengü, Ebru Ulusoy E-ISBN: 978-605-07-0764-9 DOI: 10.26650/B/SS07.2021.002 Istanbul University Publication No: 5281 Published Online in April, 2021 It is recommended that a reference to the DOI is included when citing this work. This work is published online under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is copyrighted. Except for the Creative Commons version published online, the legal exceptions and the terms of the applicable license agreements shall be taken into account. ii EDITORS Prof. Dr. Ece Karadoğan Doruk Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof. Dr. Seda Mengü Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ebru Ulusoy Farmingdale State College, New York, USA ADVISORY BOARD Prof. Dr. Celalettin Aktaş Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof. Dr. Füsun Alver Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof. Dr. M. Bilal Arık Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey Prof. Dr. Oya Şaki Aydın Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof. Dr. Aysel Aziz Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof. Dr. Güven N. Büyükbaykal Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Pacs and 501(C)(4) Nonprofits
    Super PACs and 501(c)(4) Nonprofits: How the Two Entities Can Work Together for Personal Enrichment On November 12, 2012, “The Colbert Report” host, Steven Colbert, informed viewers that his popular Super PAC, “Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow” (more commonly known as the “Colbert Super PAC”) would be dissolving.1 Because there remained in the Super PAC nearly $800,000,2 Colbert wanted to know if there existed a way in which he might keep the funds for himself in a personal capacity, while barring the public from such knowledge. Colbert invited his attorney, Trevor Potter, on the show, and Potter explained that there is a method by which the Super PAC money can be ultimately routed to Colbert without the public’s (or the IRS’s) knowledge.3 Because Colbert also solely founded and operates a 501(c)(4) organization, “Colbert Super PAC S.H.H. Institute,”4 he could essentially use this nonprofit organization as an intermediary vehicle to get the funds from his Super PAC to his own bank account – without any trace of the transaction.5 Afraid that corporate donors would shy away from donating to the “Colbert Super PAC” because of its public disclosure of donors, Colbert formed his 501(c)(4) “Colbert Super PAC S.H.H. Institute.”6 501(c)(4) nonprofits, unlike their 501(c)(3) counterparts, are allowed to engage in extensive political activity, including lobbying, participating in political campaigns and elections, and donating money to political groups. Although the practical purpose of this 1 Colbert Super PAC SHH! - Secret Second 501c4 - Trevor Potter, Colbert Nation, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 – Volume 6, Number
    THE POPULAR CULTURE STUDIES JOURNAL VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2 & 3 2018 Editor NORMA JONES Liquid Flicks Media, Inc./IXMachine Managing Editor JULIA LARGENT McPherson College Assistant Editor GARRET L. CASTLEBERRY Mid-America Christian University Copy Editor KEVIN CALCAMP Queens University of Charlotte Reviews Editor MALYNNDA JOHNSON Indiana State University Assistant Reviews Editor JESSICA BENHAM University of Pittsburgh Please visit the PCSJ at: http://mpcaaca.org/the-popular-culture- studies-journal/ The Popular Culture Studies Journal is the official journal of the Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. Copyright © 2018 Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. All rights reserved. MPCA/ACA, 421 W. Huron St Unit 1304, Chicago, IL 60654 Cover credit: Cover Artwork: “Bump in the Night” by Brent Jones © 2018 Courtesy of Pixabay/Kellepics EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD ANTHONY ADAH PAUL BOOTH Minnesota State University, Moorhead DePaul University GARY BURNS ANNE M. CANAVAN Northern Illinois University Salt Lake Community College BRIAN COGAN ASHLEY M. DONNELLY Molloy College Ball State University LEIGH H. EDWARDS KATIE FREDICKS Florida State University Rutgers University ART HERBIG ANDREW F. HERRMANN Indiana University - Purdue University, Fort Wayne East Tennessee State University JESSE KAVADLO KATHLEEN A. KENNEDY Maryville University of St. Louis Missouri State University SARAH MCFARLAND TAYLOR KIT MEDJESKY Northwestern University University of Findlay CARLOS D. MORRISON SALVADOR MURGUIA Alabama State University Akita International
    [Show full text]
  • As Writers of Film and Television and Members of the Writers Guild Of
    July 20, 2021 As writers of film and television and members of the Writers Guild of America, East and Writers Guild of America West, we understand the critical importance of a union contract. We are proud to stand in support of the editorial staff at MSNBC who have chosen to organize with the Writers Guild of America, East. We welcome you to the Guild and the labor movement. We encourage everyone to vote YES in the upcoming election so you can get to the bargaining table to have a say in your future. We work in scripted television and film, including many projects produced by NBC Universal. Through our union membership we have been able to negotiate fair compensation, excellent benefits, and basic fairness at work—all of which are enshrined in our union contract. We are ready to support you in your effort to do the same. We’re all in this together. Vote Union YES! In solidarity and support, Megan Abbott (THE DEUCE) John Aboud (HOME ECONOMICS) Daniel Abraham (THE EXPANSE) David Abramowitz (CAGNEY AND LACEY; HIGHLANDER; DAUGHTER OF THE STREETS) Jay Abramowitz (FULL HOUSE; MR. BELVEDERE; THE PARKERS) Gayle Abrams (FASIER; GILMORE GIRLS; 8 SIMPLE RULES) Kristen Acimovic (THE OPPOSITION WITH JORDAN KLEEPER) Peter Ackerman (THINGS YOU SHOULDN'T SAY PAST MIDNIGHT; ICE AGE; THE AMERICANS) Joan Ackermann (ARLISS) 1 Ilunga Adell (SANFORD & SON; WATCH YOUR MOUTH; MY BROTHER & ME) Dayo Adesokan (SUPERSTORE; YOUNG & HUNGRY; DOWNWARD DOG) Jonathan Adler (THE TONIGHT SHOW STARRING JIMMY FALLON) Erik Agard (THE CHASE) Zaike Airey (SWEET TOOTH) Rory Albanese (THE DAILY SHOW WITH JON STEWART; THE NIGHTLY SHOW WITH LARRY WILMORE) Chris Albers (LATE NIGHT WITH CONAN O'BRIEN; BORGIA) Lisa Albert (MAD MEN; HALT AND CATCH FIRE; UNREAL) Jerome Albrecht (THE LOVE BOAT) Georgianna Aldaco (MIRACLE WORKERS) Robert Alden (STREETWALKIN') Richard Alfieri (SIX DANCE LESSONS IN SIX WEEKS) Stephanie Allain (DEAR WHITE PEOPLE) A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Nailing an Exclusive Interview in Prime Time
    The Business of Getting “The Get”: Nailing an Exclusive Interview in Prime Time by Connie Chung The Joan Shorenstein Center I PRESS POLITICS Discussion Paper D-28 April 1998 IIPUBLIC POLICY Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government The Business of Getting “The Get” Nailing an Exclusive Interview in Prime Time by Connie Chung Discussion Paper D-28 April 1998 INTRODUCTION In “The Business of Getting ‘The Get’,” TV to recover a sense of lost balance and integrity news veteran Connie Chung has given us a dra- that appears to trouble as many news profes- matic—and powerfully informative—insider’s sionals as it does, and, to judge by polls, the account of a driving, indeed sometimes defining, American news audience. force in modern television news: the celebrity One may agree or disagree with all or part interview. of her conclusion; what is not disputable is that The celebrity may be well established or Chung has provided us in this paper with a an overnight sensation; the distinction barely nuanced and provocatively insightful view into matters in the relentless hunger of a Nielsen- the world of journalism at the end of the 20th driven industry that many charge has too often century, and one of the main pressures which in recent years crossed over the line between drive it as a commercial medium, whether print “news” and “entertainment.” or broadcast. One may lament the world it Chung focuses her study on how, in early reveals; one may appreciate the frankness with 1997, retired Army Sergeant Major Brenda which it is portrayed; one may embrace or reject Hoster came to accuse the Army’s top enlisted the conclusions and recommendations Chung man, Sergeant Major Gene McKinney—and the has given us.
    [Show full text]