Neoplatonism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neoplatonism .O NAVY NAVY which the offender had been the object of See Seafaring. blackmail-thus acknowledging the va- lidity of Magnus Hirschfeld's claim that the existing law encouraged the extortion NAZISM of homosexuals. The prohibition was not The ideology and practice of extended to lesbians, so that female homo- National Socialism, which under the lead- sexuality remained legal. ership of Adolf Hitler ruled Germany from When detected, male homosexu- 1933 to 1945, united several virulent als were arrested and consigned to the strands of hostility to homosexuality. concentration camps, where they were Inheriting the repressive attitudes of the placed in the lowest category of prisoners. nineteenth-century sexual purity move- In the camps homosexual inmates were ments, Nazi ideologuesreacted also to the required to wear the pink triangle as an licence they perceived as eroding the so- identifying mark; subsequently, this cia1 fabric of Germany under the Weimar emblem was adopted as a positive symbol Republic (191843). Popular sentiment by the gay liberation movements of the amongtheNazisfavoredastrongpolariza- 1970s. Estimates of the number of pink tion of male and female roles, which the triangle men killed vary from 10,000 to perception of homosexuals as "the third 250,000; probably the true number will sex" contradicted. Equating population never be known. Sadly, homosexual vic- growth with power, the Nazis also pur- tims of the Nazis were the only such goup sued a vigorous pronatalist policy. Their denied monetary compensation from the attitude toward male homosexual behav- West German government afterworldwar ior, regarded as a threat to the survival of IIbecauseof theircontinuingillegalstatus. the German people, was unequivocably Even today commemorations of the Holo- negative. Heinrich Himmler, the Nazi caust often fail to mention them. Abizarre leader most concerned with the question, footnote is the appearance of two tiny advocated drowning homosexuals in bogs groups of "gay Nazis" in California in the as a return to the tribal custom of the mid 1970s; this episode is a reflection, ancient Germans recorded by Tacitus. probably of ephemeral significance, of the It is a historical paradox that the lingering myth of the "fascist perversion." presence of a few known homosexuals in the ranks of the early Nazi Party, notably BIBLIOGRAPHY. Heinz Heger, The Men with the Pink Triangle, London: Gay Emst Rohm, the head of the paramilitary Men's Press, 1980; Manfred Herzer, Brownshirts (SA),gave unscrupulous op- "Nazis, Psychiatrists, and Cays," ponents and propagandists of the left the Ca birion, 12 (19851, 1-5; Riidiger leverage required for the superficial plau- Lautmann, "The Pink Triangle," Iournal sibility of their myth of the "fascistperver- of Homosexuality, 6 (1980-8I), 141-60; Richard Plant, The Pink Triangle: The sionn-a supposed affinity between sexual Nazi War Against Homosexuals, New deviation and Nazism. In fact, Rohm and York: Holt, 1986. his associates were liquidated on Hitler's Wayne R. Dynes orders in the Night of the Long Knives, June 30, 1934. The jurists of the Third Reich NEOPLATONISM reinforced the existing antihomosexual A revival and recasting of Plato- clause of the Reich Penal Code by adding nism-mingling with it Pythagorean, a new section (175a), but at the same time Aristotelean, Stoic, and mystic ideas-- inserted an article in the Code of Criminal Neoplatonism supplanted Stoicism as the Procedure (154b) that allowed the public dominant ~hiloso~h~of the classical world prosecutor to take no action in a case in from the mid-third century to the closing NEOPLATONISM 4 of the pagan schools at Athens and else- nent of Renaissance Neoplatonism. Ex- where by Justinian in 529. Philosophers posed to Greek thought by the arrival in from Antiochus (d. ca. 68 B.c.)to Plotinus Italy of learned Byzantines fleeing Con- (205-269170)) who opposed all sex, includ- stantinople after its fall to the Turks in ing homosexuality of every type, evolved 1453, the young Ficino discovered Plato this new synthesis. In Rome when he was and his later followers, learning Greek in forty, Plotinus founded a circle of leading order to study the original texts. (Plato had politicians and scholars, including his most been known in medieval Europe only important disciple, Porphyry (23213-ca. through often faulty Latin versions, some 3051, who arranged for the publication of of them secondary translations from the Plotinus' Enneads almost on the eve of the Arabic.) An eclectic, Ficino sought to rec- official recog~iti~nof Christianity in 313. oncile Platonism and Neoplatonism with In the fourth century, from its chief cen- Christianity, using another body of Greek ters in Syria and then Pergamon, its star texts, the Hermetic Corpus compiled in proponent being Iamblichus, Neoplaton- late antiquity. ism became the creed of the pagan antago- Of special significance is his res- nistsof Christianity, which had beenmade urrection of the Platonic ideal of love, as it the state religion by Theodosius ca. 390. is known from the Phaedrus and the Sym- Neoplatonism even influenced posium. In the sixteenth century Ficino's Christianity through St. Gregory of Nyssa version was repackaged in countless trea- and other theologians of the Byzantine tises on love, becoming the prototype of a Empire, and through St. Augustine. Neo- new concept of "courtly love" that was platonism survived at Athens and Alexan- very different from the medieval variety. dria into the sixth century. It appeared in Ficino advocated a profound but highly the writings of the pseudo-Areopagite spiritual love between two men, ideally (about 500) and John Scotus Eriugena in united by their common quest for knowl- the ninth century, as well as in the workof edge. This loveis caused, following Plato's the middle Byzantine polymath Michael conception, by the vision of beauty con- Psellus. One of the principal features of veyed by the soul of the other individual- Neoplatonism was its spectrum of grada- a beauty that reflects the celestial perfec- tions between "the One" and "matter': the tion of God. Through the physical beauty world-mind, the world-soul, and nature- of a young man-women were in Ficino's each stage being characterized by dimin- view unsuitable as catalysts of this sub- ishing unity. Mystical as well as rational, limity-the conscience of the enlightened Neoplatonism encouraged Christian be- man ascends to the Beauty which is the lief in intermediate powers such as angels archetypal Idea (in Plato's sense) on which and demons. One of Porphyry's works in the beauty that he responds to depends- five books,Against the Christians, of which to God himself. With Cosimo and Lorenzo fragments survive, though the source was de' Medici's patronage, he founded-in condemned to the flames by the Chris- imitation of Plato's Acadeiny in Athens- tians in 448, used historical criticism to the Platonic Academy in Florence, which prove the lateness of composition of the was to be a major center of Italian Renais- Book of Daniel, as elsewhere he proved the sance thought. "Book of Zoroaster" a forgery. His work on In the course of 'the sixteenth logic became the standard Byzantine text century those who followed Ficino be- and his critique of Homer a philological came increasingly uncomfortable with the landmark. homoerotic aspects of his philosophy of Marsilio Ficino (1433-1499), the love. Deploying an intellectual sleight of Florentine philosopher and humanist who hand, they heterosexualized the ideal-so was also homophile, was the chief expo- that today "Platonic love" usually means NEOPLATONISM the love of man and woman that includes Reversing roles, Nero made his husky no physical expression. freedman Doryphorus many him (though William A. Percy dispensing with the castration). Nero's many misdeeds have earned him an infamy outstanding even NERO(37-68) for the profligate age in which he lived. Roman emperor. Exiled as a re- Recent historians, however, have sought sult of the disfavoroftheEmperor Caligula, to redress the balance. His early years were the boy Nero and his ambitious mother markedby aseriouseffort at governmental Agrippina were rehabilitated and allowed reform. Unlike his cruelty, his sexual ir- to return to Rome after the emperor's regularities no longer seem monstrous. death in 41. Several Years later APiPPina And Nero presided over what has been married the emperor Claudius and1 on his called the Roman architectural revolution, demise in 54, was able to secure the throne the beginning of the great phase that for her son. Guided by the philosopher the empire's accomplishments in this field Seneca, the empire then entered an ausPi- unsurpassed. The image perpetuated by cious period of sound government. Grow- Henryk Sienkiewicz' novel Quo Vadis ing bored of the tedium of rule, however, (18961 and by ~~lly~~~dfilms is not Nero became addicted to luxury and to his confirmed by sober historical analysis. artistic pursuits-he imagined himself a distinguished poet and performer. He BIBLIOGRAPHY. K. R. Bradley, constructed for himself a great palace Suetonius' Life of Nero: An Historical Commentary, Brussels: Latomus, 1978; known as the Domus Transitoria. This Miriam Tamara Griffin, Nero, the End of proved insufficient, and Nero apparently a Dynasty, New Haven: Yale University ordered a large part of Rome set on fire in Press, 1984; Villy Ssrenson, Seneca, the 64, to serve as a site for the construction of Humanist at the Court of Nero, Chicago: his Golden House. As foreign relations University of Chicago Press, 1984. became more difficult, his connections Warren Iohansson with the Senate soured, and the plots against him required increasingly repres- NETHERLANDS,THE sive measures. A revolt by the army and (HOLLAND) Senate caused him to commit suicide, A European kingdom of fifteen uttering the words, "What an artist is Dutch-speaking the perishing in me." His death ended the Netherlands has in recent times acquired Julio-Claudian dynasty.
Recommended publications
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Trained Theologian
    THE WELL-TRAINED THEOLOGIAN essential texts for retrieving classical Christian theology part 1, patristic and medieval Matthew Barrett Credo 2020 Over the last several decades, evangelicalism’s lack of roots has become conspicuous. Many years ago, I experienced this firsthand as a university student and eventually as a seminary student. Books from the past were segregated to classes in church history, while classes on hermeneutics and biblical exegesis carried on as if no one had exegeted scripture prior to the Enlightenment. Sometimes systematics suffered from the same literary amnesia. When I first entered the PhD system, eager to continue my theological quest, I was given a long list of books to read just like every other student. Looking back, I now see what I could not see at the time: out of eight pages of bibliography, you could count on one hand the books that predated the modern era. I have taught at Christian colleges and seminaries on both sides of the Atlantic for a decade now and I can say, in all honesty, not much has changed. As students begin courses and prepare for seminars, as pastors are trained for the pulpit, they are not required to engage the wisdom of the ancient past firsthand or what many have labelled classical Christianity. Such chronological snobbery, as C. S. Lewis called it, is pervasive. The consequences of such a lopsided diet are now starting to unveil themselves. Recent controversy over the Trinity, for example, has manifested our ignorance of doctrines like eternal generation, a doctrine not only basic to biblical interpretation and Christian orthodoxy for almost two centuries, but a doctrine fundamental to the church’s Christian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • “Theology” from the Presocratics to Peter Abelard: Philosophy and Science
    Section Four PHILOSOPHY AND COSMOLOGY IN PERSONS ФилосоФия и Космология в лицах The word “Theology” from the Presocratics to Peter Abelard: Philosophy and Science. Some Remarks Mauro Ferrante1 — PhD Università degli Studi “Niccolò Cusano” — Telematica Roma (Rome, Italy) E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct, through the analysis of some key moments, the evolution of the term “theology” within the Western philosophical thought. Starting with the first formulation by the Presocratics, the study takes into consideration both the first attestation of the term by Plato (in the second book of the Republic) and the role it plays in Aristotle’s works (Metaphysics). In its second part, the paper considers the importance of the term “theology” in the Latin world, through the study of the Augustine’s critic against the greek thinkers, which will lead to a further development in the Middle Ages. The point of arrival is Peter Abelard, who formulated a concept of “theology” conceived as a science. At first, the term was tied to a pagan conception of society and was devoid of any scientific connotation. With the advent of Christianity, it begins to take on an universalistic character connected with the concept of an absolute truth. It is here pointed out, through all of these antecedents, how, in the Middle Ages, when the “theology” became an autonomous science and responds to its own laws, how it is assumed and used as an instrument to manage both science and truth. Thanks to the contributions of the ancient philosophers, developed by medieval thinkers, it was possible to subsequently use the term “theology” also in a political sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Axial Arguments Over God from Hellenistic Through Medieval Christianity
    Axial Arguments over God from Hellenistic through Medieval Christianity 1. Welcome to this next video lecture tracking the co-evolution of religion and technology. In this video we shall survey axial arguments over the existence of God in early and medieval Christian thought. In contrast to bronze age scribes whose calling was to preserve traditional oral myth and ritual, Christian scribes, still working within the church, but outside court and temple in the new axial scribal institution of the university, engaged in a metalevel, theoretical systematization and critique of Christian belief and practice. 2. As we saw in the first millennium translation of Christian belief into the axial categories of Hellenistic philosophy, Origen had offered a spiritual hermeneutics for the creation account in the book of Genesis. While his commentary on Genesis has not survived, we do have his commentary on the Prologue of John’s Gospel. We can also draw upon his own systematic work on Christian ontology, On First Principles (Peri Archōn). a. Origen argued for a theoretically informed narrative of creation. To summarize the cosmogenesis presented in the last lecture, Orgin argued that creation occurred in two stages. (1) The first creation was a purely spiritual cosmos, (2) a plērōma of pure spirits, as perfect an image of the divine as a created image could be. However as finite yet living forever, eventually these spirits would turn away from God. But how could pure spirits ever turn away from God? Because, as made in the divine image, they were also made in the image of God’s creative freedom, with the ability to make their own choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology As Academic Discourse in Greco-Roman Late Antiquity1
    THEOLOGY AS ACADEMIC DISCOURSE IN GRECO-ROMAN 1 LATE ANTIQUITY Josef Lössl, Cardiff University ([email protected]) Abstract: Following conventional wisdom Theology as an academic discipline (taught at Universities) is something which developed only in the Middle Ages, or in a certain sense even as late as the 19th century. The present essay in contrast traces its origins to Classical Antiquity and outlines its development in early Christianity, especially with a view to institutions of higher education that existed in Late Antiquity, e. g. in rhetoric and philosophy. It concludes that there were forms of academic theological discourse in Late Antiquity which were to become the basis of later developments in the discipline. Introduction The title of this paper may seem problematic in the sense that Classical Antiquity knew neither an academic discipline called “theology”2 nor a secular institution of higher education that could be compared with what we understand by “university”.3 1 An earlier version of this paper was presented on 16 April 2013 at a symposium on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main. I thank the organi-sers of the symposium, in particular Prof. Dr. Knut Wenzel, for inviting me to speak on that occasion. 2 Of course, early Christian discourse as reflected in the extant literary remains of early Christianity is generally assumed to be, at least to a large part, also in some sense theology; for a discussion of this point see Chr. Markschies, Die kaiserzeitliche christliche Theologie und ihre Institutionen (Tübingen, 2009), now translated as Chr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Thought Greco-Roman
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 27 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Thought D. Jeffrey Bingham Greco-Roman Understanding of Christianity Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203864517.ch3 Paul Hartog Published online on: 21 Dec 2009 How to cite :- Paul Hartog. 21 Dec 2009, Greco-Roman Understanding of Christianity from: The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Thought Routledge Accessed on: 27 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203864517.ch3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 23:14 27 Sep 2021; For: 9780203864517, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203864517.ch3 First published 2010 by Routledge 2 park square, milton park, abingdon, oxon oX14 4Rn simultaneously published in the usa and Canada by Routledge 270 madison ave., new york, ny 100016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Justifying Religious Freedom: the Western Tradition
    Justifying Religious Freedom: The Western Tradition E. Gregory Wallace* Table of Contents I. THESIS: REDISCOVERING THE RELIGIOUS JUSTIFICATIONS FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.......................................................... 488 II. THE ORIGINS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN EARLY CHRISTIAN THOUGHT ................................................................................... 495 A. Early Christian Views on Religious Toleration and Freedom.............................................................................. 495 1. Early Christian Teaching on Church and State............. 496 2. Persecution in the Early Roman Empire....................... 499 3. Tertullian’s Call for Religious Freedom ....................... 502 B. Christianity and Religious Freedom in the Constantinian Empire ................................................................................ 504 C. The Rise of Intolerance in Christendom ............................. 510 1. The Beginnings of Christian Intolerance ...................... 510 2. The Causes of Christian Intolerance ............................. 512 D. Opposition to State Persecution in Early Christendom...... 516 E. Augustine’s Theory of Persecution..................................... 518 F. Church-State Boundaries in Early Christendom................ 526 G. Emerging Principles of Religious Freedom........................ 528 III. THE PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN MEDIEVAL AND REFORMATION EUROPE...................................................... 530 A. Persecution and Opposition in the Medieval
    [Show full text]
  • Affect and Ascent in the Theology of Bonaventure
    The Force of Union: Affect and Ascent in the Theology of Bonaventure The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Davis, Robert. 2012. The Force of Union: Affect and Ascent in the Theology of Bonaventure. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9385627 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA © 2012 Robert Glenn Davis All rights reserved. iii Amy Hollywood Robert Glenn Davis The Force of Union: Affect and Ascent in the Theology of Bonaventure Abstract The image of love as a burning flame is so widespread in the history of Christian literature as to appear inevitable. But as this dissertation explores, the association of amor with fire played a precise and wide-ranging role in Bonaventure’s understanding of the soul’s motive power--its capacity to love and be united with God, especially as that capacity was demonstrated in an exemplary way through the spiritual ascent and death of St. Francis. In drawing out this association, Bonaventure develops a theory of the soul and its capacity for transformation in union with God that gives specificity to the Christian desire for self-abandonment in God and the annihilation of the soul in union with God. Though Bonaventure does not use the language of the soul coming to nothing, he describes a state of ecstasy or excessus mentis that is possible in this life, but which constitutes the death and transformation of the soul in union with God.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on Jerome's Contra Vigilantium by Amy
    A COMMENTARY ON JEROME’S CONTRA VIGILANTIUM BY AMY HYE OH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Philology with a concentration in Medieval Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Danuta Shanzer Professor Ralph Mathisen Professor Jon Solomon Professor Stephan Heilan, University of Osnabrück ABSTRACT Innkeepers inspired this dissertation. After working on ‘innkeepers’ as a topic for a research seminar paper, I soon discovered that the term caupo counted as an insult according to several church fathers, including Jerome. In the Contra Vigilantium, Jerome mocked his enemy, Vigilantius, by calling him a caupo who mixed water with wine; I wondered whether the title was true and the insult was deserved. What remained was to figure out who this man was and why he mattered. The dissertation is comprised of four parts: introductory chapters, a text with an en face translation, a philological/historical commentary, and appendices. The first chapter introduces Vigilantius, discusses why a commentary of the Contra Vigilantium is needed, and provides a biography, supported by literary and historical evidence in response to the bolder and more fanciful account of W.S. Gilly.1 The second chapter treats Vigilantius as an exegete. From a sample of his exegesis preserved in Jerome’s Ep. 61, I determine that Jerome dismissed Vigilantius’ exegesis because he wanted to protect his own orthodoxy. The third chapter situates Vigilantius in the debate on relic worship. His position is valuable because he opposed most of his contemporaries, decrying relics instead of supporting their translation and veneration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Christians in the First Century
    JETS 61.3 (2018): 525–47 THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS IN THE FIRST CENTURY ECKHARD J. SCHNABEL* Abstract: The Book of Acts, Paul’s letters, 1 Peter, Hebrews, and Revelation attest to nu- merous incidents of persecution, which are attested for most provinces of the Roman empire, triggered by a wide variety of causes and connected with a wide variety of charges against the fol- lowers of Jesus. This essay surveys the twenty-seven specific incidents of and general references to persecution of Christians in the NT, with a focus on geographical, chronological, and legal matters. Key words: persecution, mission, hostility, opposition, Jerusalem, Rome, Peter, Paul, Acts, Hebrews, Revelation This essay seeks to survey the evidence in the NT for instances of the perse- cution of Jesus’ earliest followers in their historical and chronological contexts without attempting to provide a comprehensive analysis of each incident. The Greek term diōgmos that several NT authors use, usually translated as “persecu- tion,”1 is defined as “a program or process designed to harass and oppress some- one.”2 The term “persecution” is used here to describe the aggressive harassment and deliberate ill-treatment of the followers of Jesus, ranging from verbal abuse, denunciation before local magistrates, initiating court proceedings to beatings, flog- ging, banishment from a city, execution, and lynch killings. I. PERSECUTION IN JUDEA, SYRIA, AND NABATEA (AD 30–38/40) 1. Persecution in Jerusalem, Judea (I). Priests in Jerusalem, the captain of the tem- ple, and Sadducees arrested the apostles Peter and John who spoke to a crowd of * Eckhard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: the Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P
    Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: The Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P. MAHONEY Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) is without doubt one of the most intriguing figures of the Italian Renaissance. It is thus no surprise that he has attracted the attention of many modern scholars. By reason of the varied interests that are reflected in his writings, contrasting interpretations of Pico have been proposed.1 Our purpose here is not to present a new and different picture of Pico but, rather, to offer a contribution to one fruitful area of research pursued by some recent historians of philosophy, namely, Pico's debt to, and 1. For general presentations of Pico's life and thought, see the classic study of Eugenio Garin, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Vita e dottirina (Florence: F. Le Monnier, 1937); Garin's magisterial Storia della filosofia italiana, 2d ed. (Turin: G. Einaudi 1966), 1:458-495. Among more recent general accounts are Pierre-Marie Cordier, Jean Pic de la Mirandole (Paris: Debresse, 1958); Engelbert Monnerjahn, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1960); Paul Oskar Kristeller, Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964), pp. 54-71; Giovanni di Napoli, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola e laproblemaύca dottrinale del suo tempo (Rome: Desclee, 1965); Charles Trinkaus, In Our Image and Likeness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 2:505-526; and Henri de Lubac, Pic de la Mirandole: Etudes et discussions (Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1974). 165 166 EDWARD P. MAHONEY use of, medieval philosophy in his overall philosophical enterprise.2 Of particular concern will be the influence of Albert the Great on Pico, which can be established by a connection that has apparently not been noticed by Pico's historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Mysticism
    CHAPTER ONE Platonic Mysticism n the introduction, we began with the etymology of the word I“mysticism,” which derives from mystes (μύστης), an initiate into the ancient Mysteries. Literally, it refers to “one who remains silent,” or to “that which is concealed,” referring one’s direct inner experi- ence of transcendence that cannot be fully expressed discursively, only alluded to. Of course, it is not clear what the Mysteries revealed; the Mystery revelations, as Walter Burkert suggested, may have been to a significant degree cosmological and magical.1 But it is clear that there is a related Platonic tradition that, while it begins with Plato’s dialogues, is most clearly expressed in Plotinus and is conveyed in condensed form into Christianity by Dionysius the Areopagite. Here, we will introduce the Platonic nature of mysticism. That we focus on this current of mysticism originating with Plato and Platonism and feeding into Christianity should not be understood as suggesting that there is no mysticism in other tradi- tions. Rather, by focusing on Christian mysticism, we will see much more clearly what is meant by the term “mysticism,” and because we are concentrating on a particular tradition, we will be able to recog- nize whether and to what extent similar currents are to be found in other religious traditions. At the same time, to understand Christian mysticism, we must begin with Platonism, because the Platonic tra- dition provides the metaphysical context for understanding its latest expression in Christian mysticism. Plato himself is, of course, a sophisticated author of fiction who puts nearly all of what he wrote into the form of literary dialogues 9 © 2017 Arthur Versluis 10 / Platonic Mysticism between various characters.
    [Show full text]