BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035633 on 11 May 2020. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035633 on 11 May 2020. Downloaded from Reporting of Drug Trial Funding Sources and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Cochrane and non- Cochrane Meta-analyses: A Cross-sectional Study ForJournal: peerBMJ Open review only Manuscript ID bmjopen-2019-035633 Article Type: Original research Date Submitted by the 08-Nov-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Turner, Kimberly; Jewish General Hospital and McGill University Carboni-Jiménez, Andrea; McGill University Benea, Carla; Jewish General Hospital Elder, Katharine; Jewish General Hospital Levis, Brooke; McGill University, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Boruff, Jill; McGill University, Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering Roseman, Michelle; McGill University Bero, Lisa; University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre / Pharmacy Lexchin, Joel; York University, School of Health Policy and Management Turner, Erick; Portland VA Medical Center, ; Oregon Health & Science http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ University, Psychiatry Benedetti, Andrea; McGill University Thombs, Brett; Jewish General Hospital and McGill University Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY, STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS, MEDICAL ETHICS on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 1 of 107 BMJ Open 1 2 3 4 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035633 on 11 May 2020. Downloaded from 5 6 7 8 9 I, the Submitting Author has the right to grant and does grant on behalf of all authors of the Work (as defined 10 in the below author licence), an exclusive licence and/or a non-exclusive licence for contributions from authors 11 who are: i) UK Crown employees; ii) where BMJ has agreed a CC-BY licence shall apply, and/or iii) in accordance 12 with the terms applicable for US Federal Government officers or employees acting as part of their official 13 duties; on a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free basis to BMJ Publishing Group Ltd (“BMJ”) its 14 licensees and where the relevant Journal is co-owned by BMJ to the co-owners of the Journal, to publish the 15 Work in this journal and any other BMJ products and to exploit all rights, as set out in our licence. 16 17 The Submitting Author accepts and understands that any supply made under these terms is made by BMJ to 18 the Submitting Author Forunless you peer are acting as review an employee on behalf only of your employer or a postgraduate 19 student of an affiliated institution which is paying any applicable article publishing charge (“APC”) for Open 20 Access articles. Where the Submitting Author wishes to make the Work available on an Open Access basis (and 21 intends to pay the relevant APC), the terms of reuse of such Open Access shall be governed by a Creative 22 Commons licence – details of these licences and which Creative Commons licence will apply to this Work are set 23 out in our licence referred to above. 24 25 Other than as permitted in any relevant BMJ Author’s Self Archiving Policies, I confirm this Work has not been 26 accepted for publication elsewhere, is not being considered for publication elsewhere and does not duplicate 27 material already published. I confirm all authors consent to publication of this Work and authorise the granting 28 of this licence. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml BMJ Open Page 2 of 107 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035633 on 11 May 2020. Downloaded from 1 2 3 1 Reporting of Drug Trial Funding Sources and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in 4 5 6 2 Cochrane and non-Cochrane Meta-analyses: A Cross-sectional Study 7 8 3 9 10 4 Kimberly A Turner, Andrea Carboni-Jiménez, Carla Benea, Katharine 11 12 5 Elder, Brooke Levis, Jill Boruff, Michelle Roseman, Lisa A Bero, 13 14 15 6 Joel Lexchin, Erick H Turner, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs 16 For peer review only 17 7 18 19 8 Affiliations: 20 21 22 9 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, 23 24 10 Montreal, Quebec, Canada 25 26 11 Kimberly A Turner (masters student) 27 28 12 Andrea Carboni-Jiménez (research assistant) 29 30 31 13 Carla Benea (undergraduate student) 32 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 14 Katharine Elder (research assistant) 34 35 15 Brooke Levis (doctoral student) 36 37 38 16 Brett D Thombs (professor) 39 40 17 on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 41 42 18 Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, 43 44 19 Montreal, Quebec, Canada 45 46 47 20 Jill Boruff (associate librarian) 48 49 21 50 51 22 Kingsway Medical Centre Family Health Organization, Toronto, 52 53 54 23 Ontario, Canada 55 56 57 1 58 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 3 of 107 BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035633 on 11 May 2020. Downloaded from 1 2 3 24 Michelle Roseman (family physician) 4 5 25 6 7 8 26 Charles Perkins Centre, and Faculty of Medicine and Health, and School of Pharmacy, The 9 10 27 University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 11 12 28 Lisa A Bero (professor) 13 14 15 29 16 For peer review only 17 30 School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, 18 19 31 Canada 20 21 22 32 Joel Lexchin (professor emeritus) 23 24 33 25 26 34 Department of Psychiatry and Department of Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science 27 28 29 35 University, Portland, Oregon, USA 30 31 36 Erick H Turner (associate professor) 32 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 37 34 35 38 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 36 37 38 39 Montreal, Quebec, Canada 39 40 40 Andrea Benedetti (associate professor) on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 41 42 41 43 44 45 42 Correspondence to: Brett D. Thombs, PhD; Jewish General Hospital; 4333 Cote Ste. Catherine 46 47 43 Road; Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E4; Tel (514) 340-8222 ext. 25112; E-mail: 48 49 44 [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0002-5644-8432 50 51 52 45 53 54 46 Word count: 4,048 55 56 57 2 58 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml BMJ Open Page 4 of 107 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035633 on 11 May 2020. Downloaded from 1 2 3 47 ABSTRACT 4 5 6 48 Objective: To (1) investigate the extent to which recently published meta-analyses report trial 7 8 49 funding, author-industry financial ties, and author-industry employment from included RCTs, 9 10 50 comparing Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses; (2) examine characteristics of meta- 11 12 51 analyses independently associated with reporting funding sources of included RCTs; and (3) 13 14 15 52 compare reporting among recently published Cochrane meta-analyses to Cochrane reviews 16 For peer review only 17 53 published in 2010. 18 19 54 Design: Review of consecutive sample of recently published meta-analyses. 20 21 22 55 Data sources: MEDLINE database via PubMed searched on October 19, 2018. 23 24 56 Eligibility criteria for selecting articles: We selected the 250 most recent meta-analyses listed 25 26 57 in PubMed that included a documented search of at least one database, statistically combined 27 28 29 58 results from ≥ 2 RCTs, and evaluated the effects of a drug or class of drugs. 30 31 59 Results: 90 of 107 (84%) Cochrane meta-analyses reported funding sources for some or all 32 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 60 included trials compared with 21 of 143 (15%) non-Cochrane meta-analyses, a difference of 69% 34 35 61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 59% to 77%). Percent reporting was also higher for Cochrane 36 37 38 62 meta-analyses compared with non-Cochrane meta-analyses for trial author-industry financial ties 39 40 63 (44% versus 1%; 95% CI for difference, 33% to 52%) and employment (17% versus 1%; 95% on September 24, 2021 by guest.