Public Document Pack Argyll and Bute Council Comhairle Earra Ghaidheal agus Bhoid
Corporate Services Director: Nigel Stewart
Lorn House, Albany Street, Oban, Argyll, PA34 4AW Tel: 01631 5679307 Fax: 01631 570379
26 November 2003
NOTICE OF MEETING
A meeting of the OBAN LORN & THE ISLES AREA COMMITTEE will be held in the COUNCIL CHAMBER, MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS, ALBANY STREET, OBAN on WEDNESDAY, 3 DECEMBER 2003 at 10:30 AM, which you are requested to attend.
Nigel Stewart Director of Corporate Services
BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
3. CORPORATE SERVICES
(a) Minute of Oban, Lorn and the Isles area committee meeting held on 5th November 2003 (Pages 1 - 10)
(b) Area Capital Funding (Pages 11 - 12)
4. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
(a) List of Building Warrants approved by the Director of Development Services since the last meeting (Pages 13 - 18)
(b) List of Delegated Decisions issued by the Director of Development Services since the last meeting (Pages 19 - 22)
(c) Planning Application ref: 03/00879/OUT: Mr Norman MacDonald - erection of five dwelling houses - Land at Baliscate, Tobermory (Pages 23 - 30)
(d) Planning Application ref: 03/01587/OUT: Mr Henderson - Site for the erection of a dwelling - Land south east of water works, Tobermory (Pages 31 - 38)
(e) Planning Application ref. 03/01689/DET: Scottish Water - Construction of pumping station, septicity building and associated works - Land adjacent to Achaleven Primary School, Connel (Pages 39 - 42)
(f) Report by Director of Development Services in regard to six month development control performance council wide and decentralised area team performance (Pages 43 - 46)
5. COMMUNITY SERVICES
(a) Applications for financial assistance under the Social Welfare Grants Scheme (Pages 47 - 50)
(b) Report by Director of Community Services in regard to examination results 2003 (Pages 51 - 58)
(c) Report by Director of Community Services in regard to Mull Theatre (Pages 59 - 60)
(d) Oral update on West Highland Project
6. OPERATIONAL SERVICES
(a) Report by Head of Amenity Services in regard to Playing Fields - Strategic Review (Pages 61 - 70)
(b) Report by Transportation Manager in regard to rural transport grant (Pages 71 - 78)
(c) Report by Head of Transportation & Infrastructure in regard to Luing Tidal Power Fixed Link (Pages 79 - 80)
7. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
The Committee will be asked to pass a resolution in terms of Section 50(A)(4) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 to exclude the public for items of business with an “E” on the grounds that it is likely to involve the disclosure of exempt information as defined in the appropriate paragraph of Part I of Schedule 7a to the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973.
The appropriate paragraphs are:-
E1, E2 - Paragraph 9 Any terms proposed or to be proposed by or to the authority in the course of negotiations for a contract for the acquisition or disposal of property or the supply of goods or services.
E3 - Paragraph 13 Information which, if disclosed to the public, would reveal that the authority proposes-
(a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; or (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment.
E4 - Paragraph 6 Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (other than the authority).
E1 8. GROUND LEASES
(a) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to ground leases in Oban
E2 9. WHITE BUILDING, NORTH PIER, OBAN
(a) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to the White Building, North Pier, Oban (Pages 81 - 82)
E3 10. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
(a) 00/00034/ENFOTH (Pages 83 - 86)
(b) 00/00125/ENFOTH (Pages 87 - 94)
(c) 01/00070/ENFOTH (Pages 95 - 98)
(d) 02/00121/ENFOTH (Pages 99 - 102)
(e) 02/00209/ENFMIN (Pages 103 - 108)
(f) Report by Head of Planning Services in regard to ongoing monitoring of conditions of planning consent ref. 99/01121/min (including Condition 21) (Pages 109 - 112)
(g) Report by Head of Planning Services in regard to development control enforcement activity in Oban Lorn & the Isles area
(h) Report by Head of Planning Services in regard to dangerous building - Isle of Tiree (Pages 113 - 114)
E4 11. DEEDS AND DOCUMENTS
(a) Report by Chief Solicitor in regard to formal Deeds and Documents issued between 23rd August 2003 and 19th November 2003 (Pages 115 - 118)
OBAN, LORN & THE ISLES AREA COMMITTEE
Councillor Robin Banks Councillor Ian Gillies (Vice-Chairman) Councillor Allan Macaskill Councillor Alistair MacDougall (Chairman) Councillor Sidney MacDougall Councillor Duncan MacIntyre Councillor Donald McIntosh Councillor Elaine Robertson
Contact: [email protected]
This page is intentionally left blank Page 1 Agenda Item 3a
MINUTES of MEETING of OBAN LORN & THE ISLES AREA COMMITTEE held in the COUNCIL CHAMBER, MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS, ALBANY STREET, OBAN on WEDNESDAY, 5 NOVEMBER 2003
Present: Councillor Alistair MacDougall (Chair) Councillor Robin Banks Councillor Allan Macaskill Councillor Sidney MacDougall Councillor Donald McIntosh Councillor Duncan MacIntyre Councillor Elaine Robertson
Attending: Kenneth Macdonald, Area Corporate Services Manager Sandy McAuslan, Estate Surveyor Gary Wilson, Building Control Manager Gordon King, Senior Building Control Officer John Maciver, Senior Development Control Officer Iain Welsh, Area Amenity Services Manager Iain MacKinnon, Senior Environmental Health Officer David Craig, Area Community Education Officer Alex Taylor, Area Service Manager, Social Work David Duthie, Head of Transportation & Infrastructure Neil Brown, Area Transportation Manager
Prior to the commencement of ordinary business, the Chairman introduced Mr Derek Crooks, who had recently been appointed as an Environmental Warden in the Oban, Lorn & the Isles area.
The Chairman ruled, and the Committee agreed, in terms of Section 50B(4)(b) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and in terms of Standing Order 3.2.2, that items 3(d) and 3(e), which were not specified in the Agenda, should be considered at this meeting as a matter of urgency because of the need for a decision to be taken prior to the next meeting.
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Councillor Ian Gillies
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Councillor Robertson declared a pecuniary interest in relation to planning application reference 03/01551/DET, which is dealt with in item 4(d) of this minute, because her husband is a partner in the firm of solicitors acting for a number of the objectors to the application.
Councillor Duncan MacIntyre declared a non-pecuniary interest in relation to planning application reference 03/01553/DET, which is dealt with in item 4(e) of this minute, because he has lodged a formal objection to this application. He also declared a non- pecuniary interest in relation to the application, from the Oban Area Coaching Committee for Shinty, for financial assistance under the Leisure Development Grants Scheme, which is dealt with in item 4(h) of this minute, because he is a member of that Committee.
1 Page 2
3. CORPORATE SERVICES
(a) Minute of Oban Lorn & the Isles Area Committee meeting held on 22nd September 2003
The Committee approved the Minute as a correct record of the meeting held on 22nd September 2003, subject to the replacement, under item 1 (Declarations of Interest), of the words ‘Lismore Estates’ by the words ‘D.M.MacKinnon & Co.’.
(b) Minute of Oban Lorn & the Isles Area Committee meeting held on 8th October 2003
The Committee approved the Minute as a correct record of the meeting held on 8th October 2003
(c) Area Capital Funding
With reference to the decision, at the meeting held on 8th October 2003, that the additional sum of capital funding of £15,187 which had become available be allocated to roads projects, the Committee considered a report, dated 15th October 2003, by the Area Transportation Manager in regard to proposals for expenditure of this sum. The report also advised that the sum of £7,000 previously allocated to replace two cattle grids would not now be required, leaving this funding available for re-allocation.
Decision:
It was agreed to allocate the available funding as follows:
(a) £15,187 for the provision of a footway on Soroba Road, Oban, between Drummore Road and the railway bridge; and (b) £7,000 to be added to the £10,700 already allocated for parking improvements in Ward 11 (Oban North).
(Ref: Report dated 15th October 2003 by the Area Transportation Manager, submitted)
The Committee also considered, and noted, a report dated 24th October 2003 by the Area Corporate Services Manager in regard to the current position in respect of projects funded from the sum available to the Area Committee for allocation in 2003/04.
(Ref: Report dated 24th October 2003 by the Area Corporate Services Manager, submitted)
(d) Feasibility Study – Luing Fixed Link
2 Page 3
The Committee considered and noted a report dated 31st October 2003 by the Head of Transportation & Infrastructure in regard to the current position in respect of the feasibility study.
(Ref: Report dated 31st October 2003 by the Head of Transportation & Infrastructure, submitted).
(e) Area Strategy
The Committee was asked to identify, from the Area Strategy for the Oban, Lorn & the Isles area, the top five priorities, to inform the process of preparing the Council’s Corporate Plan.
Decision: The following five priorities were agreed:
(i) Oban Airport, North Connel (ii) A848 Salen – Tobermory Road, Isle of Mull (iii)Development Road, Oban (iv) Oban Harbour (v) Luing Fixed Link
(f) Request for Appointment to Oban Skateboard Partnership
The Committee considered a letter dated 9th October 2003 from the Secretary of Oban Skateboard Partnership requesting the appointment of a representative to the Partnership.
Decision:
It was agreed that Councillor Sidney MacDougall be appointed as the Council’s representative on the Oban Skateboard Partnership.
(Ref: Letter dated 9th October 2003 from the Secretary of the Oban Skateboard Partnership, submitted).
(g) Report by Head of Protective Services in regard to Oban Waste Water Treatment Works and Corran Parks Pumping Station
The Committee considered and noted a report dated 28th October 2003 by the Senior Environmental Health Officer in regard to a fault at the waste water treatment works at Pennyfuir on 16th July 2003, and an incident at the Corran Parks pumping station which occurred on 12th August 2003.
(Ref: Report dated 28th October 2003 by the Senior Environmental Health Officer, submitted).
4. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
3 Page 4
(a) List of Building Warrants approved by the Director of Development & Environment Services since the last meeting
The Committee noted a list of Building Warrants and Relaxation of the Building Standards Regulations dated 16th October 2003 in respect of which approvals had been issued since the last meeting.
(Ref: List of approvals dated 16th October 2003, submitted)
(b) List of Delegated Decisions issued by the Director of Development and Environment Services since the last meeting
The Committee noted a list of applications for planning permission dated 16th October 2003 in respect of which delegated decisions had been issued since the last meeting.
(Ref: List of approvals dated 16th October 2003, submitted)
(c) Mr & Mrs Campbell Roberts - Planning Application ref: 03/01169/DET Erection of dwelling house and installation of septic tank – Land south of Culrigh, North Connel, Oban.
It was agreed that consideration of this application be continued to allow a site inspection meeting to be held on 3rd December 2003.
Prior to consideration of the following item, Councillor Robertson, having earlier declared an interest therein, left the meeting and took no part in the discussion.
(d) Scottish Water - Planning Application ref: 03/01151/DET Construction of a waste water pumping station, lay-by and ancillary works – Car Park and land adjacent to Clachcruachan, Connel, Oban.
It was agreed that consideration of this application be continued to allow an informal hearing to be held on 5th December 2003.
Prior to consideration of the following item, Councillor MacIntyre, having earlier declared an interest therein, left the meeting and took no part in the discussion.
(e) Scottish Water - Planning Application ref: 03/01553/DET Construction of a waste water pumping station, lay-by and ancillary works – Land Adjacent to Meadow Road Dunbeg.
It was agreed that consideration of this application be continued to allow an informal hearing to be held on 5th December 2003.
(f) Appeal Decision of the Scottish Executive Inquiry Reporters Unit
4 Page 5
The Committee considered, and noted, a report by the Head of Planning in regard to the dismissal, by the Scottish Executive Inquiry Reporter’s Unit, of the appeal by the executors of the late Mrs Oatey against the Council’s refusal to grant outline planning permission for the erection of a dwelling house on the rear garden area of “Cortachy”, Polvinister Road, Oban.
It was agreed that in future a copy of the Inquiry Reporter’s report be circulated to Members.
(Ref: Report by Head of Planning, submitted)
(g) Report by Head of Planning on Building Control performance monitoring and six monthly service plan progress
The Committee considered a report dated 6th October 2003 by the Building Control Manager in regard to the Building Control half yearly performance with respect to processing building warrant and completion certificate applications in accordance with the requirements of Audit Scotland.
Decision:
Members agreed to:
(a) Note the report; and
(b) Express concern in regard to the lack of progress in terms of introducing procedures for greater involvement of Building Control in Section 23 Licensing Certificates, and press that this issue be dealt with as a matter of urgency.
(Ref: Report dated 6th October 2003 by the Building Control Manager, submitted).
(h) Applications for financial assistance under the Leisure Development Grants Scheme
The Committee determined applications from voluntary organisations for financial assistance under the Leisure Development Grants Scheme as follows:
Applicant Narrative Total Cost Decision
Prior to consideration of the following item of business Councillor Duncan MacIntyre, having earlier declared an interest therein, left the meeting and took no part in the discussion.
Oban Area Coaching Development of £3,441 Grant of £1,500 Committee for Shinty 2003/04 programme
5 Page 6
Applicant Narrative Total Cost Decision
Oban Pipe Band Performances in £550 Grant of £ 550 2003
Tiree Windsurfing Club Tiree Wave Classic £77,435 Grant of £1,500 2003
Oban Lorne Rugby Provision of £1,164 Grant of £ 582 Football Club floodlights for training
King George Fund for Royal Marines £3,100 Grant of £1,500 Sailors Band Concert 2004
Soroba Glen Residents Upgrading of £3,565 Grant of £1,816 Association playpark
Oban Town Centre Christmas lights £10,000 No Grant in light Traders Association of alternative source of funding from the Council
Total £7,448
(Ref: Report dated 8th October 2003 by the Principal Leisure Resources Officer, submitted)
7. COMMUNITY SERVICES
(a) Applications for financial assistance under the Education Development Grants Scheme
The Committee determined an application from Park Primary School PTA for financial assistance under the Leisure Development Grants Scheme as follows:
Applicant Narrative Total Cost Decision
Park Primary Residential course at £4,866 Grant of £750 School PTA Castle Toward Outdoor Centre
(Ref: Report by Area Community Education Officer, submitted)
8. OPERATIONAL SERVICES
(a) Report by Area Transportation Manager in regard to parking income
6 Page 7
The Committee considered a report dated 15th October 2003 by the Area Transportation Manager in regard to the proposed expenditure of £100,000, being the minimum anticipated surplus of parking income over expenditure in Oban, Lorn & the Isles in 2003/2004.
Decision:
Members identified the following priorities for expenditure of the £100,000, together with any further surplus income which may become available within the current financial year:
1. Temporary staff costs to promote outstanding Traffic Regulation £ 20,000 Orders
2. Repairs to bus bays in Station Road, Oban £ 15,000 Additional ‘Twenty Plenty’ advisory 20mph speed limits: Mossfield / Dalintart £ 4,000 Dunbeg £ 4,000 Ganavan £ 2,000 Lora View, North Connel £ 2,000 Gallanach Road £ to be costed*
Bonawe Road Edge lining £ 4,500
3. Crossapol, Isle of Tiree – Upgrade chicanes as part of £ 25,000 separate enhancement scheme
4. A819 Accurach – Improve road camber, alignment and £ 55,000 signage at accident blackspot ______£131,500*
It was noted that a progress report will be submitted to the February meeting.
(Ref: Report dated 15th October 2003 by the Area Transportation Manager, submitted)
9. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Douglas Trigg Welcomed the approach of the Area Transportation Ardchattan Community Council Manager to the issue of the Bonawe Road.
Douglas Trigg Asked if the issue of ownership of the car park at Ardchattan Community Council Benderloch could be hastened to an early conclusion. The Area Corporate Services Manager was instructed to pursue this with the Head of Legal & Protective Services
Donald Hutchison Commended the Area Transportation Manager and his Appin Community Council staff for works carried out in the Appin area.
7 Page 8
Exclusion of Press and Public The Area Committee resolved in terms of Section 50(A)(4) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 to exclude the public for the following item of business on the grounds that it was likely to involve the disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 6 and 9, Part 1 of Schedule 7A to the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973.
10. ACQUISITION / DISPOSAL / LEASING OF PROPERTY
(a) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to proposed sale of garages at Lorn Avenue, Oban
The Committee considered, and approved, a report dated 10th October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services in regard to the sale of the concrete panels forming the lock-up garages at Lorn Avenue, Oban.
(Ref: Report dated 10th October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services, submitted)
(b) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to lease of car park at An Tobar, Isle of Mull (to follow)
The Committee considered, and approved, a report dated 17th October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services in regard to a request from An Tobar for a reduction in the rent payable in respect of a licence to utilise the car park at Tobermory High School on an occasional basis and subject to the prior approval of the Head Teacher.
(Ref: Report dated 17th October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services, submitted).
(c) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to proposed sale of land at Taynuilt
The Committee considered, and approved, a report dated 17th October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services in regard to the proposed sale of ground to the rear of 41 Cruachan Cottages, Taynuilt.
(Ref: Report dated 17th October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services, submitted).
(d) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to proposed sale of land at Kilmore
8 Page 9
The Committee considered, and approved, a report dated 2nd October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services in regard to the proposed sale of land at Feochan Cottages, Kilmore, Oban.
(Ref: Report dated 2nd October 2003 by the Director of Corporate Services, submitted).
(e) Report by Director of Corporate Services in regard to Ground Leases in Oban
The Committee were advised that this report had not yet been completed, but that it would be available for submission to the December meeting.
Decision:
It was agreed that a report on this issue would be submitted to the December meeting.
9 Page 10
This page is intentionally left blank ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL- PROGRAMME OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE - 2003-2004 COMPOSITE CAPITAL PROGRAMME - AREA COMMITTEE - LORN & THE ISLES For Year to Date: 21st November 2003
Start date Project Budget /commencement of Estimated Project Description Manager 2003/2004 YTD Actual on site works Completion date Comments £ Taynuilt Sports Club - Grant towards all- K Macdonald 6,000 6,000 Complete weather sports facility (Ward 10) Bonawe Footpath (Ward 15) N Brown 10,000 10,000 Sep-03 Complete Community Councils (Wards 10 & 14) for I Welsh 6,800 Onging Feb-04 Rate of spend dependent upon uptake by Community Councils. Two amenity enhancement projects projects progressing so far. Dunollie Footpath, Oban (Ward 11) I Welsh 6,100 1,500 Sep-03 Dec-03 Tree work & safety barrier completed. Surfacing and landscape improvements to be completed in December.
Mossfield Stadium - structural works to I Welsh 16,800 6,000 Sep-03 Dec-03 New flooring installed and work on changing areas has commenced. changing area and entrances (Ward 12) Completion of shower areas expected December Approved by Council 22.10.03 Land Acquisition, Soroba (Ward 13) D Kelly 16,800 2,055 Page 11 Road Safety Improvements (Ward 14) N Brown 9,500 Oct-03 Work in progress. Completion date dependent upon Seil Community Council. Crossapol, Tiree Village enhancement I Welsh 16,800 Oct-03 Feb-04 In consultation with local community. Initial groundwork anticipated scheme (Ward 17) November. Improvements to parking arrangements N Brown 17,700 Feb-04 Consultation being carried out with resident who hold rights in common (Ward 11) over the proposed site. Planning consent required. Improvements to Lora View playpark, North I Welsh 6,800 350 Oct-03 Dec-03 Scrub clearance complete. Fencing to be completed in November, Connel (Ward 15) followed by installation of new equipment. Upgrading public toilets (Ward 16) I Welsh 16,800 Dec-03 Jan-04 New access for disabled units programmed for January
Feasibility study into a fixed link to provide a P Ward 15,000 Sep-03 Nov-03 Work in progress Agenda Item3b tidal power scheme - Luing / Seil Provision of footway on Soroba Road, Oban N Brown 15,187 Jan-04 Feb-04
Provision of road signs throughout Oban, N Brown 5,000 Dec-03 Feb-04 Lorn & the Isles Road Improvements - Area Wide N Brown 30,853 22,500 Nov-04 Luing resurfacing - Complete Blaran road end - Complete except for remedial works. Connel Village footway - Complete
GROSS SPEND PLANNED 196,140 48,405 Page 12
This page is intentionally left blank Page 13 Argyll and Bute Agenda Item 4a Council BUILDING CONTROL DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES
CASENO APPLICANT NAME/PROPOSAL RECEIVED VETTED DECISION DECISIO AND SITE ADDRESS DATE N
01/00627/EX Hilarie Grace Burnett Hounam 24/04/2001 02/05/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Extension of sitting room below roof and into existing balcony - addition of kitchen extension Cnoc Chalet Erray Road Tobermory Isle Of Mull
02/01557/AO Mr & Mrs Boys 23/09/2002 24/09/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to 02/00642/ALT
Fasgadh Clachan Seil Oban Argyll PA34 4TJ
03/00040/ER Mr And Mrs B Askew 10/01/2003 14/01/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of dwelling house
Land East Of 26 Mossfield Drive Mossfield Drive Oban Argyll
03/00138/EX Mr F Sims 27/01/2003 17/02/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Extension and Alterations to Dwelling
Dalrannoch Farm Barcaldine Oban Argyll
03/00550/AO Owen Sails 25/03/2003 26/03/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Warrant 02/01253/ERC (erection of sail loft and offices) Tralee Bay Caravan Park Benderloch Oban Argyll
03/00598/ER Mr Angus Douglas 02/04/2003 09/04/200 20/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of garage
Awe Service Station Taynuilt Argyll PA35 1HT
03/00734/ER Norman MacDonald 24/04/2003 06/05/200 25/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of a dwelling house
Land South East Of Sunart View Guest House Tobermory Isle Of Mull 03/00833/AL Mr And Mrs Macmillan 09/05/2003 13/05/200 12/11/2003 WARAPP
Alteration to roof space
Sunnybank Croft Road Oban Argyll PA34 5JN
03/00836/AO Education Department 09/05/2003 17/06/200 31/10/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Warrant 02/01058/ALT
Drummore Special School Soroba Oban Argyll PA34 4SB
WARAPP=Building Warrant Approved WARREF=Building Warrant Refused WARWIT=Building Warrant Withdrawn LETTER=Letter of Comfort EXEMPT=Exempt Building Warrant SUPERS=Superceded by new Building Warrant 13 November 2003 Page 1 of 5 Page 14 Argyll and Bute Council BUILDING CONTROL DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES
CASENO APPLICANT NAME/PROPOSAL RECEIVED VETTED DECISION DECISIO AND SITE ADDRESS DATE N
03/01127/AO Mrs D Mathieson 19/06/2003 17/07/200 10/11/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to 03/00017/ERD - Construction of a new dwelling house Appin House Appin Argyll PA38 4BN
03/01200/ER Anna Taylor 30/06/2003 03/07/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of Dwelling House
Ruin At Lonban Isle Of Coll
03/01296/CO Mr Mrs J MacGregor 10/07/2003 01/08/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Change of use and alterations of outbuildings
Outbuildings Taynuilt Hotel Taynuilt Argyll
03/01357/EX H Burnett 21/07/2003 29/07/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Extension to dwelling
Cnoc Chalet Erray Road Tobermory Isle Of Mull
03/01457/MT Mr Iain Bowman 06/08/2003 06/08/200 04/11/2003 WARAPP
Extension and alteration to dwelling house
Morvern Cottage Breadalbane Street Tobermory Isle Of Mull PA75 6PD 03/01482/ER Mr Mrs D Hegarty 07/08/2003 08/08/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of dwelling house
Land South East Of Woodend Glencruitten Road Oban Argyll
03/01568/EX Mr & Mrs MacColl 25/08/2003 26/08/200 12/11/2003 WARAPP
Extension to Dwelling
Balnagowan Lismore Oban Argyll PA34 5UL
03/01593/AL Mr And Mrs Currie 28/08/2003 29/08/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Proposed erection of conservatory
Creag Bheag The Pier Port Appin Appin Argyll PA38 4DN
03/01597/EX Rowena Freeman 20/05/2003 10/09/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Extension to dwelling house and installation of new septic tank
Smithy Cottage Scarinish Isle Of Tiree
WARAPP=Building Warrant Approved WARREF=Building Warrant Refused WARWIT=Building Warrant Withdrawn LETTER=Letter of Comfort EXEMPT=Exempt Building Warrant SUPERS=Superceded by new Building Warrant 13 November 2003 Page 2 of 5 Page 15 Argyll and Bute Council BUILDING CONTROL DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES
CASENO APPLICANT NAME/PROPOSAL RECEIVED VETTED DECISION DECISIO AND SITE ADDRESS DATE N
03/01618/ER Mr Robert William Dickson 02/09/2003 09/09/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of dwelling house
Plot 4 Erray Road Tobermory Isle Of Mull
03/01643/EX Ms D Fleming 08/09/2003 10/10/200 10/11/2003 WARAPP
Extension and Internal Alterations
Inverliever Loch Etive Taynuilt Argyll PA35 1JT
03/01645/EX Mr & Mrs Millard 08/09/2003 11/09/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Extension to Existing House
Ceol Na Mara Lismore Oban Argyll
03/01674/EX Mr J MacIntyre 10/09/2003 17/09/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Extension to house
Plot 1 Lagganbeg Kilninver Oban Argyll
03/01771/ER Norman Macdonald - Builders 30/09/2003 06/10/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of dwelling house
Land South Of Carpark Salen Isle Of Mull
03/01772/AO Thomas John Hay 30/09/2003 02/10/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Amended proposal - 02/00401/ERD (Alteration of existing agricultural barn for use as a dwelling) Park Farm Lismore Oban Argyll PA34 5UN
03/01777/EX Sue And Norman Smith 30/09/2003 07/10/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Extension to dwelling house
Valkerie Pulpit Drive Oban Argyll PA34 4LE
03/01815/AL Simon Hannigan 06/10/2003 07/10/200 31/10/2003 WARAPP
Alteration to Dwelling and Addition of Conservatory
Dun Fraoich Taynuilt Argyll PA35 1JE
03/01816/EX B Buchanan-Smith 06/10/2003 06/10/200 31/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of Conservatory
Eriska House Benderloch Oban Argyll PA37 1SD
WARAPP=Building Warrant Approved WARREF=Building Warrant Refused WARWIT=Building Warrant Withdrawn LETTER=Letter of Comfort EXEMPT=Exempt Building Warrant SUPERS=Superceded by new Building Warrant 13 November 2003 Page 3 of 5 Page 16 Argyll and Bute Council BUILDING CONTROL DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES
CASENO APPLICANT NAME/PROPOSAL RECEIVED VETTED DECISION DECISIO AND SITE ADDRESS DATE N
03/01838/AO Oban Developments 08/10/2003 08/10/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Warrant 03/00085/STG (erection of 62 bed nursing home) Lynn Of Lorn Nursing Home Benderloch Oban Argyll PA37 1QW 03/01852/AL Mr Mrs G Seaton 09/10/2003 21/10/200 22/10/2003 WARAPP
Alteration to form shower room
Burnlea Glenmore Road Oban PA34 4ND
03/01858/AO West Highland Housing Association Limited 10/10/2003 21/10/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to 02/01224/ALT - Refurbishment of 16 flats
1 Burnside Court Miller Road Oban Argyll PA34 4DL
03/01880/AL J M Gillies Limited 15/10/2003 20/10/200 10/11/2003 WARAPP
Installation of external oil boiler and oil storage tank and internal alterations 11 Carnan Road Arinagour Isle Of Coll PA78 6TA
03/01924/AL West Highland Housing Association Limited 21/10/2003 22/10/200 12/11/2003 WARAPP
Refurbishment of flat No. 6
6 Macdougall Court Oban Argyll PA34 5BA
03/01925/AO Mr And Mrs Forteith 21/10/2003 22/10/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Amended proposal
Land North West Of Blaven Pulpit Road Oban Argyll
03/01932/AL Duncan C Macintyre 22/10/2003 22/10/200 10/11/2003 WARAPP
Alteration to dwelling
Lagganbuie Knipoch Oban Argyll PA34 4QT
03/01959/AO Mr And Mrs M Evetts 24/10/2003 27/10/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Erection of a dwelling house
Croft Land Kilvaree Connel Oban Argyll
03/01962/AO Eriska Enterprises 27/10/2003 27/10/200 30/10/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Warrant 03/00919/ALT (alterations to form spa rooms and balcony) Eriska House Benderloch Oban Argyll PA37 1SD
WARAPP=Building Warrant Approved WARREF=Building Warrant Refused WARWIT=Building Warrant Withdrawn LETTER=Letter of Comfort EXEMPT=Exempt Building Warrant SUPERS=Superceded by new Building Warrant 13 November 2003 Page 4 of 5 Page 17 Argyll and Bute Council BUILDING CONTROL DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES
CASENO APPLICANT NAME/PROPOSAL RECEIVED VETTED DECISION DECISIO AND SITE ADDRESS DATE N
03/01983/AO Mr & Mrs Woodhouse 29/10/2003 04/11/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Warrant 03/00073/ERD (erection of dwelling house) Torr Mhic Redhinn Ulva Ferry Isle Of Mull
03/01998/AO M And K Macleod 31/10/2003 04/11/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Amended proposal (plot 42)
Creag Bhan Village Glengallan Road Oban Argyll PA34 4BF
03/02016/AO Mr Colin MacNiven 03/11/2003 04/11/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Warrant 03/00177/MTP (erection of sun room extension to existing house - various internal alterations) Linden Laurel Crescent Oban Argyll PA34 5ED
03/02017/AO Celtic Sea Ltd 03/11/2003 04/11/200 05/11/2003 WARAPP
Amendment to Consent 03/100791/ERC (Erection of Mussel Farm Storage, Depuration Shed and Staff Quarters, Office, Land East Of Arduaine,lochmelfort Arduaine Oban Argyll
WARAPP=Building Warrant Approved WARREF=Building Warrant Refused WARWIT=Building Warrant Withdrawn LETTER=Letter of Comfort EXEMPT=Exempt Building Warrant SUPERS=Superceded by new Building Warrant 13 November 2003 Page 5 of 5 Page 18
This page is intentionally left blank Page 19 Argyll and Bute Council Agenda Item 4b Development Services TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE
OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES App. No Applicant name, address and proposal Valid date Decision date Decision
03/01869/DET Mr And Mrs A Lawson 09/10/2003 12/11/2003 PER 2 Nant Drive Soroba Oban Argyll PA34 4LA
Extension to dwellinghouse
03/01855/ADV Builder Center 07/10/2003 12/11/2003 PER Builder Centre/Plumb Centre Lynn Road Oban Argyll PA34 4PL Erection of Fascia Signs and Freestanding Sign
03/01820/WGS Mr S Charrington 30/09/2003 04/11/2003 NOO Scottish Forestry Grant Scheme Dervaig Tobermory Isle Of Mull Woodland Grant Scheme
03/01784/DET Ian Stewart 24/09/2003 12/11/2003 PER 21 Lonan Drive Soroba Oban Argyll PA34 4NN
Erection of Garden Shed
03/01753/LIB Ms Tina Jordan 18/09/2003 23/10/2003 PER 55 Easdale Island Oban Argyll PA34 4TB
Extension to dwelling (revised details of conservatory relative to consent 02/01033/LIB) 03/01742/NMA Ms Tina Jordan 18/09/2003 23/10/2003 NOO 55 Easdale Island Oban Argyll PA34 4TB
Non material amendment to 02/01031/DET - amendment to conservatory 03/01705/DET Vodafone Limited 18/09/2003 23/10/2003 PER Vodafone Basestation Dalavich Taynuilt Argyll
3m extension of existing 18m vodafone lattice tower to accommodate 3 No. antennae and 1 No. dish with 03/01670/DET Ms D Fleming 08/09/2003 23/10/2003 PER Inverliever Loch Etive Taynuilt Argyll PA35 1JT
Extension and Internal Alterations to dwellinghouse - amendment to previous consent ref. 00/00528/DET 03/01653/DET Mr C Evans 03/09/2003 22/10/2003 PER Plot 4 Woodend Glencruitten Drive Oban Argyll
Erection of dwelling
PER=APPROVED WDN=WITHDRAWN NOO=NO OBJECTIONS AAR=APPLICATION REQUIRED CGR=CERTIFICATE GRANTED OBR=OBJECTIONS RAISED PDD=PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT PRE=PERMISSION REQUIRED NRR=NEW APPLICATION REQUIRED
13 November 2003 Page 1 of 3 Page 20 Argyll and Bute Council Development Services TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE
OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES App. No Applicant name, address and proposal Valid date Decision date Decision
03/01611/DET Tony Jones 29/08/2003 22/10/2003 PER Harbour View Scarinish Isle Of Tiree PA77 6UH
Extension to dwellinghouse
03/01565/DET Mr Neil Paterson 09/09/2003 22/10/2003 PER 4 Kilmore Terrace Dervaig Tobermory Isle Of Mull PA75 6QN Erection of dwellinghouse
03/01538/DET Mr & Mrs Colin Boden 18/08/2003 22/10/2003 PER Land North East Of Ardbrecknish House Ardbrecknish Dalmally Argyll Erection of a Dwelling House
03/01503/DET Oban And Lorn Riding For The Disabled Association 18/08/2003 22/10/2003 PER Land West Of Achnalarig Farm Glencruitten Oban Argyll
Erection of Riding School
03/01460/OUT Dr Susan K Reed 29/07/2003 06/11/2003 PER Site At Achnahard Ardtun Bunessan Isle Of Mull
Site for erection of dwellinghouse
03/01333/DET Eriska Enterprises 23/07/2003 06/11/2003 PER Eriska House Benderloch Oban Argyll PA37 1SD
Erection of 4 staff cottages
03/01304/DET Eilean Eisdeal 24/07/2003 12/11/2003 PER Easdale Harbour Easdale Island Oban Argyll
Formation of pontoon
03/01295/OUT Mr & Mrs P Healy 15/07/2003 22/10/2003 PER Plot 2 Land East Of 16 Crossapol Scarinish Isle Of Tiree
Site for Erection of Dwelling House
03/01198/DET Mr A J Knowles 31/07/2003 12/11/2003 PER Land West Of Shed Kilmelford Yacht Haven Kilmelford Oban Argyll PA34 4XD Erection of dwelling, installation of septic tank and oil tank
PER=APPROVED WDN=WITHDRAWN NOO=NO OBJECTIONS AAR=APPLICATION REQUIRED CGR=CERTIFICATE GRANTED OBR=OBJECTIONS RAISED PDD=PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT PRE=PERMISSION REQUIRED NRR=NEW APPLICATION REQUIRED
13 November 2003 Page 2 of 3 Page 21 Argyll and Bute Council Development Services TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DELEGATED DECISIONS SINCE LAST COMMITTEE
OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES App. No Applicant name, address and proposal Valid date Decision date Decision
03/00838/OUT Mrs M Macphee 22/05/2003 22/10/2003 PER Land North And East Of Cruachan Filling Station Lochawe Dalmally Argyll Site for erection of 8 dwellinghouses
PER=APPROVED WDN=WITHDRAWN NOO=NO OBJECTIONS AAR=APPLICATION REQUIRED CGR=CERTIFICATE GRANTED OBR=OBJECTIONS RAISED PDD=PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT PRE=PERMISSION REQUIRED NRR=NEW APPLICATION REQUIRED
13 November 2003 Page 3 of 3 Page 22
This page is intentionally left blank Page 23 Agenda Item 4c Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30
This page is intentionally left blank Page 31 Agenda Item 4d
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Local Member - Cllr MacDougall PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT Date of Validity - 25th August 2003 OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES Committee Date - 3rd December 2003
13th November 2003
Reference Number: 03/01587/OUT Applicants Name: Mr J Henderson Application Type: Outline Application Application Description: Site for the Erection of a Dwelling Location: Land South West of Water Works, Tobermory, Isle of Mull
(A ) THE APPLICATION
Development Requiring Express Planning Permission.
• Site for the erection of a dwellinghouse (no details submitted). • Existing access to be altered/improved
Other Specified Operations
• None
(B ) RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that this application be refused on strong policy grounds.
(C ) DETERMINING ISSUES AND MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Structure Plan Policy STRAT DC 8
STRAT DC 8 of the Argyll and Bute Structure Plan considers that development which, by reason of location, siting, scale, form, design or cumulative impact, damages or undermines the key environmental features of a visually contained or wider landscape or coastscape shall be treated as ‘non-sustainable’ and contrary to this policy. For the reasons stated below (see (i) Environmental Impact) it is considered the proposal will have an adverse impact on the landscape quality of this area of Mull. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy STRAT DC 8.
• Local Plan Policy HO 5.
As Members will be aware the Mull, Coll & Tiree Local Plan seeks to restrict uncoordinated housing development on the periphery of Tobermory, in the interest of conserving the existing landscape setting of the town and in order to ensure that future public infrastructure provision is implemented in an efficient manner. To this end, the Council has identified a zone around Tobermory wherein the general presumption in favour of new residential development has been removed. Policy HO 5 gives effect to this objective. The application site lies within the zone identified by policy HO 5 and the proposal is therefore contrary to this policy.
• Local Plan Policies STRAT 4 and STRAT 4A.
All proposals for new development within the Tobermory settlement area require to be assessed in terms of the criteria set out in Policy STRAT 4A of the Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan; as follows:
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\8\9\6\AI00012698\1587WR141003NMH0.DOC 1
Page 32
(i) Environmental Impact
Site comprises open agricultural land on the outskirts of Tobermory, adjacent to the water treatment works on the road to Dervaig. The site lies within the open countryside around Tobermory, however this is not an undeveloped landscape, it features a small number of houses, a farm and the water works, scattered within the landscape. The site lies adjacent to the north side of the B8073. The site is contained within the bend in the road to the east and south, and by the water works to the north. The main level central part of the site is in an elevated position on top of a grassed knoll of grazing land. The ground slopes steeply towards the road, and is covered in thick shrubbery and trees to the east.
The erection of a house on this elevated ground would appear ‘perched’ on the top of this knoll and would not have the benefit of a landscape backdrop from all angles, resulting in skyline development. This type of skyline development is not the norm in this area of Tobermory. The other buildings in the immediate area, of which some are elevated from the road, have the benefit of a landscape backdrop. The erection of a house on the elevated ground of this currently proposed site would be an incongruous feature in the landscape, being both prominent and not integrating with the existing topography.
In light of the foregoing, it is considered the proposal will have an adverse impact on the landscape quality of this Local Scenic Area and is accordingly contrary to Policy STRAT 4A of the Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan and Policy STRAT DC 8 of the approved Argyll and Bute Structure Plan.
(ii) Locational/operational need
No claim of operational or locational need has been made by the applicant
(iii) Economic Benefit
I am unaware of any benefit which would accrue.
(iv) Servicing and Infrastructure Implications
The existing vehicular access currently serving the water works is proposed. The Area Roads Engineer has made no comment regarding this. The applicant has not indicated the drainage or water supply arrangements for the proposal. Scottish Water have commented that there is a public water main in the area to which a connection could be made. There are no known sewers in the area.
(v) Sterilisation of Natural Resources
None
(vi) Effect on Nature and Heritage Conservation
None
(vii) Alternative Policies and Proposals
The site lies within the Tobermory Area of Local Landscape Significance and the proposal therefore requires to be assessed in terms of the criteria set out in Policy RUR 2 of the Local Plan. This criteria is covered by the STRAT 4A assessment, namely, Environmental Impact; Locational/Operational Need; Economic Benefit and Servicing and Servicing and Infrastructure. See above.
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\8\9\6\AI00012698\1587WR141003NMH0.DOC 2
Page 33
(D ) CONCLUSION
• The proposed development is contrary to Policy HO 5 of the Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan as the site lies within an area on the periphery of Tobermory wherein the presumption in favour of new housing development has been removed. • It is considered that the proposal would have an adverse impact on the landscape quality of this area of local landscape significance. The proposal cannot therefore be justified in terms of Policy STRAT 4A or RUR 2 of the Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan and Policy STRAT DC 8 of the Argyll and Bute Structure Plan. • The proposed development cannot be justified in terms of Policy STRAT 4A, with particular respect to Locational/Operational Need
Angus J Gilmour Head of Development and Building Control
Author: Nicola Hamilton 01631 567957 Point of Contact: John Maciver 01631 567951
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\8\9\6\AI00012698\1587WR141003NMH0.DOC 3
Page 34
REASONS FOR REFUSAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION 03/01587/OUT
1. Policy HO5 of the Adopted Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan states that the Council will identify a zone around Tobermory where the general presumption in favour of single and small scale residential development shall not apply. The application site is located within this area and consequently the proposal is contrary to Policy HO5. 2. The proposed site is located within an area where the presumption in favour of new residential development has been removed by virtue of Policy STRAT 4 of the Adopted Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan. Within such areas it is the Council’s adopted policy to resist unco-ordinated residential development because of the adverse incremental effect such development would have on the landscape setting of Tobermory and the proper provision of public services. 3. The proposed site is located on an elevated knoll within the open countryside on the periphery of the Tobermory. The erection of a dwelling house on this elevated ground would appear ‘perched’ on the top of this knoll and would not have the benefit of a landscape backdrop, resulting in skyline development which is out of character with the surrounding landscape and existing development within it. As such the development of a house on this site would be an incongruous feature in the landscape, being both prominent and not integrating with the existing topography. Accordingly, the proposed dwelling house has not been sufficiently justified in terms of Policy STRAT 4A of the Adopted Mull, Coll & Tiree local Plan with particular reference to locational/operational need, environmental impact and alternative policies contained within the Local Plan. 4. The proposal represents sporadic development within the Tobermory Bay Local Scenic Area where the existing pattern of development is characterised by a small number of widely dispersed dwellings, farm buildings and the water works. The proposed site is physically unrelated to any existing development cluster and does not relate well to the established pattern of development. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy RUR 1 of the adopted Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan which seeks to maintain and enhance the landscape quality of the local scenic area. 5. The development has not been sufficiently justified in respect of the criteria set out in the Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan Policy RUR 2 with respect to environmental impact such justification being required for developments located within the Tobermory Settlement Area and within the East Coast of Mull Local Scenic Area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy RUR 2 of the adopted Mull, Coll and Tiree Local Plan and Policy STRAT DC 8 of the approved Argyll and Bute Structure Plan.
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\8\9\6\AI00012698\1587WR141003NMH0.DOC 4
Page 35
APPENDIX RELATIVE TO 03/01587/OUT
(A) POLICY OVERVIEW
Argyll and Bute Structure Plan
STRAT DC 8 (A) Development which, by reason of location, siting, scale, form and design or cumulative impact, damages or undermines the key environmental features of a visually contained or wider landscape or coastscape shall be treated as ‘non- sustainable’ and is contrary to this policy. Outwith the National Park particularly important and vulnerable landscapes in Argyll and Bute are those associated with:
1. National Scenic Area 2. Historic landscapes and their setting with close links with archaeology and built heritage and/or historic gardens and designed landscapes. 3. Landward and coastal areas with semi-wilderness or isolated or panoramic quality.
(B) Protection, conservation and enhancement to landscape will also be encouraged in association with development and land use proposals.
Mull, Coll and Tiree Local PLan
STRAT 4 A presumption in favour of single or small scale residential development in the countryside except:
(i) in locations identified as being important for nature, heritage or archaeological conservation. (ii) In areas of better quality or ‘in-bye’ agricultural land. (iii) In the Tobermory, Dervaig, Lochdon and Iona settlement areas.
STRAT 4A All proposals for single or small scale residential development in the Islands countryside will be examined in terms of infrastructure and servicing implications and in scenic areas and coasts careful consideration will be given to the design, setting and scale of development. In addition, in the areas covered by STRAT (I) –(iii) proposals require to be justified against the following criteria:
(i) locational/operational need (ii) economic benefit (iii) sterilisation of natural resources (iv) environmental impact (v) effect on conservation of natural and heritage resources (vi) alternative policies and proposals contained in the local plan
HO 5 The Council will identify a zone around Tobermory where the general presumption in favour of small scale residential development in the countryside will not apply.
RUR 1 The Council will seek to maintain and, where possible, enhance the landscape quality of National and Regional Scenic Areas and Coasts and areas of local landscape significance, and within these areas will resist prominent or sporadic development which would have an adverse environmental impact.
RUR 2 Proposals for development in or affecting National Scenic Areas and Coasts or areas of local landscape significance will require to be justified against the following criteria:
(a) environmental impact (b) locational.operational need (c) economic benefit (d) infrastructure and servicing implications
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\8\9\6\AI00012698\1587WR141003NMH0.DOC 5
Page 36
(B) OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
(i) Site History
None
(ii) Consultations
Response Date Comment Area Roads Engineer 13.11.03 No objections subject to conditions West of Scotland Archaeology Service 11.09.03 No objections Scottish Water 11.09.03 No objections Public Protection 09.09.03 No objections subject to further information and conditions.
(iii) Publicity and Representations
Advert Type : Article 9 – Vacant Land Closing Date : 18.09.03
Advert Type: Departure From Approved Development Plan Closing Date: 25.09.03
No representations have been received.
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\8\9\6\AI00012698\1587WR141003NMH0.DOC 6
Page 37 Page 38
This page is intentionally left blank Page 39 Agenda Item 4e
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Local Member - Councillor E Robertson PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT Date of Validity - 19th September 2003 OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES Committee Date - 3rd December 2003
13th November 2003
Reference Number: 03/01689/DET Applicants Name: Scottish Water Application Type: Detailed Application Application Description: Construction of a pumping station, septicity building, lay-by and ancillary works Location: Land East of Achaleven Primary School, Connel, By Oban
(A ) THE APPLICATION
Development Requiring Express Planning Permission.
• Erection of pumping station and septicity dosing system. • Construction of retaining wall • Formation of layby • Installation of predominantly underground valve chamber, wet well chamber, CSO chamber and associated pipework. • Engineering operations (ground removal) to form level platform for pumping station/septicity building.
(B ) RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the application be continued to allow further information to be received which demonstrates the system proposed would mitigate the potential for the development of septic sewage within the network.
(C ) DETERMINING ISSUES AND MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Introduction
This current proposal comprises part of an overall scheme for the collection and transfer of waste water from Connel and Dunbeg to the Oban Waste Water Treatment Works at Pennyfuir for treatment. There are four applications under consideration by the Council relating to this overall scheme, of which this application forms one. The others comprise a pumping station on land adjacent to Meadow Road, Dunbeg (03/01553/DET), a pumping station on land adjacent to the car park opposite the Dunstaffnage Arms Hotel (03/01551/DET), and a septicity dosing tank at Oban Waste Water Treatment Works (03/01552/DET).
Normally only the lay-by and the septicity building would require planning permission as any underground works associated with the provision of a new sewer would be ‘permitted development’ in terms of Class 43a of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Scotland) Order 1992. However, in this case planning permission is required for all elements of the proposal as the pumping station is not technically all underground due to the existing ground level being built up by approximately 0.2 metre at its highest point to accommodate the underground equipment.
The key determining issues relating to this proposal are as follows:
Visual Impact.
The site comprises an area of rough ground on the shore side of the public road at Connel. The site lies immediately adjacent to the Achaleven primary school. The land slopes away from the public road down to shore level. It is proposed to undertake a substantial amount of cut at the site to allow for a platform to be formed for the septicity building. The ground would be lowered to such a level as to
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\9\9\6\AI00012699\0301689DET0.DOC 1
Page 40
result in the septicity building roof extending only 0.7 metres above the level of the public road. The building will also be set back from the edge of the road. This will result in a building which is not readily visible from the public road. The building will also benefit from a backdrop when viewed from a distance from the North Connel side of the loch. The tanks will be predominantly underground and the retaining walls formed from gabion baskets to further minimise the visual impact of the proposal. It is considered the proposal will result in the minimum of visual intrusion.
Road Safety
A new layby is to be formed to allow vehicular access to the site. The Scottish Executive Trunk Road Network Management Division has no objections to the proposal, subject to a condition seeking full construction details of the layby before construction commences.
Impact on amenity
The Council’s Protective Services Unit have advised as follows: “A previous response was provided in relation to this application in October 2003 when it was considered that there was insufficient detail to satisfactorily demonstrate that the system proposed would mitigate the potential for the development of septic sewage within the sewerage network. The report noted that in the event that septicity was not adequately impeded by the chemical dosing system it would be possible for odour nuisance to occur further along the network.
Since this time additional information has been received from Scottish Water that provides a better understanding of the proposed system and answers specific questions regarding the dosing methods and controls. However, having now presented this information to our consultant at Glasgow Scientific Services, the consultant is of the opinion that, given that the system proposed is not a simple one, further technical details are required for assessment. Such technical details would enable the consultant to make a more scientific judgement regarding the potential success of the proposals and the potential for odour nuisance. It is understood that Scottish Water may be in a position to furnish some of this information quite readily, but that detailed modelling has not been undertaken to date. Whether the information that is readily available will be sufficient for our consultants purposes is as yet unknown.
Having considered this application and the additional supporting information, it is apparent that Scottish Water have identified a methodology for controlling the development of septicity within the sewerage network, however, assurances that the proposals will be successful are not supported by any technical information. I am therefore of the opinion that there is insufficient technical detail to satisfactorily demonstrate that the system proposed would mitigate the potential for the development of septic sewage within the network. In the event that septicity was not adequately impeded by the chemical dosing system it is possible that odour nuisance could occur further along the network. I would therefore recommend that the application be continued until further information has been submitted for examination by the Planning Authority in consultation with Protective Services and Glasgow Scientific Services.”
(D ) CONCLUSION
In light of the foregoing it is considered the proposal will not have an adverse visual impact and raises no road safety concerns. There remain concerns over the potential for odour nuisance should the dosing system proposed not be sufficient to mitigate the potential for development of septic sewage within the sewerage network. It is considered appropriate to fully assess the potential for odour nuisance, after submission of further details from Scottish Water, to ensure there will be no adverse impact on the amenity of surrounding properties.
Angus J Gilmour Head of Planning
Author: Susan Poole 01631 567956
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\9\9\6\AI00012699\0301689DET0.DOC 2
Page 41
APPENDIX RELATIVE TO 03/01689/DET
A. POLICY OVERVIEW
In terms of Section 25 of the Act the following Development Plan Policies are applicable:
There are no specific development plan policies which directly relate to this proposal.
(B) OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
(a) Site History
None specific to this site.
(ii) Consultations
Response Date Comment Scottish Environmental Protection Agency 10.10.03 No objections Public Protection Unit 13.11.03 Recommend continuation Scottish Executive Trunk Roads Authority 3.10.03 No objection subject to conditions
SEPA made the following comments:
The pumping station will require consent from SEPA for an emergency overflow. Scottish Water should consult with SEPA locally to discuss consent parameters such as emergency storage capacity, discharge location etc. The consent application will be advertised and during the statutory time period involved with this process, the public etc will have the opportunity to make representations.
It is understood that, when require, crude sewage will be dosed in the septicity building (either manually or automatically) with calcium nitrate in order to prevent malodorous conditions. Relatively small volumes 2 x 1,250 litres/week) of this on toxic chemical will be required. SEPA is satisfied that adequate precautions have been taken to deal with any spillages.
SEPA would request written confirmation is obtained from Scottish Water confirming that sufficient capacity exists both at the pumping station and the treatment works in Oban to adequately treat the additional loading this proposal will afford.
While SEPA has no objection to this specific proposal for the scheme which transfers foul drainage from Connel and Dunbeg to the Oban treatment works, we do recognise that this collection scheme will not include all properties in the Connel area. This is far from ideal and SEPA feels that such an approach is short-sighted and unsustainable and Scottish Water is missing an excellent opportunity to connect all properties into the system which would bring an even greater improvement to the amenity and water quality of the area. SEPA has no legal remit at present to force people to connect to the sewer, or for Scottish Water to provide a public sewer where none currently exists for agglomerations of less than 2000 people.”
In response to comments from SEPA, Scottish Water has made the following comments:
Oban Sewer Network
We have and are continuing to investigate the impact of the Connel and Dunbeg waste water flows being transferred to the Oban sewer network. Our investigations have shown that the sewer network does have sufficient capacity to accept these flows.
The only possible exception to this is the Corran Park pumping station, which is being further investigated with a view to aiming for a no change scenario, i.e. the addition of Connel and Dunbeg flows has no difference to the number of storm overflow discharges from Corran Park. Scottish Water are currently undertaking investigations into the Oban sewer network to identify areas of improvement that would allow this case to develop.
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\9\9\6\AI00012699\0301689DET0.DOC 3
Page 42
Notwithstanding the above, Scottish Water will be designing the Connel and Dunbeg (including the impact at Oban) to the satisfaction of SEPA with regard to achievement of discharge consents.
(iii) Publicity and Representations
Advert Type : Article 9 Vacant Land Advert Closing Date: 16.10.03
Representations : 1 letter of representation have been received to the proposal.
Name Address Letter date Margaret McLean Kinmundy, Glen Park, Connel 17.10.03
The writer has requested her letter is not summarised.
“The pumping station and water outlet are too near the School, and the layby nearly opposite the road junction. I realise sewage has to be treated, but why these buildings every couple of miles. I thought most Towns and Cities had pumping stations under the roads with there pipes? Argyll Tourism is a major part of employment, destroy the countryside, and all will be lost forever.
If there must be a building, a few hundred yards east of the School there is an area of woodland, near an old boathouse. In this area the building is away from houses and could be hidden on all sides by landscaping.
I understand, Connel and Dunbeg sewage is to be pumped to Oban? Will the sewage plant in Oban be able to cope with extra sewage, as there are already problems without it??
I think the buildings are Scottish Water trying to get away with the first cheapest option!! ALL PUMPING STATIONS SHOULD BE BELOW GROUND like under roads.
P.PS There will be many trees removed which will spoil the look of the shoreline”
Comment :
1. The proposal has been assessed in terms of the impact on the amenity of surrounding properties, including the school. It is considered the proposal will not adversely affect the amenity of the surrounding area. 2. The proposed tanks are predominantly underground. The buildings are necessary to access the controls. It is considered the proposed building has been sensitively site on must lower ground to minimise the public view of the building. The roof of the septicity building will only extend 0.7m above the level of the road, whilst being set back from the road by over 11 metres. It is not considered that the proposal will adversely affect the landscape quality of this area. 3. Whilst there may be other sites which the writer considers to be more suitable, my department is required to assess the current application on its own merits. 4. Scottish Water will require to satisfy the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency over the adequacy of the Oban treatment works before they would received consent to discharge. 5. A landscaping condition is proposed which seeks replacement planting along the boundaries of the site to further minimise the impact of the proposal.
F:\MODERNGOV\DATA\AGENDAITEMDOCS\9\9\6\AI00012699\0301689DET0.DOC 4
Page 43 Agenda Item 4f
DECEMBER 2003 ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL
ALL AREA COMMITTEES
REPORT ON SIX MONTH DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PERFORMANCE COUNCIL WIDE AND DECENTRALISED AREA TEAM PERFORMANCE
FROM DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 31st October 2003
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 As Members are aware, my Department sets Development Control performance standards in consultation with the Area Committees each year. Subsequent to setting these performance standards a “six monthly” progress report is presented to each of the Area Committees to monitor progress against the pre-determined performance levels.
2. SUMMARY
2.1 As detailed in my report, my Department is currently 1.7% behind the 90% target for processing all householder applications within two months and 3.6% behind the 72% target for processing all applications within two months.
2.2 In terms of the decentralised areas the report highlights that:
• Bute and Cowal is 7% below its target of processing 77% of all applications in two months.
• Helensburgh and Lomond is 6% above its target of processing 78% of all applications within two months.
• Oban, Lorn and the Isles is 7% below its target of processing 65% of all applications in two months.
• Mid Argyll, Kintyre and Islay is 2% above its target of processing 65% of all applications in two months.
3.0 RECOMMENDATION
3.1 It is recommended that Members:
(a) Note the contents of the report.
4.0 COUNCIL WIDE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PERFORMANCE SET AGAINST COUNCIL PERFORMANCE STATISTICS
4.1 The Development Control function has recently completed the six monthly Scottish Executive return for the period 1st April to 30th September. This return shows that the Council has processed 88.3% of all householder applications within two months and 68.4% of all applications within two months.
4.2 The six monthly monitoring exercise has therefore identified that there is a 1.7% shortfall in processing householder applications (target 90%) and a 3.6% shortfall in processing all applications (target 72%).
4.3 With regards to the remainder of the statistical year, it is a matter of managing the process to attempt to overcome the target shortfalls. In this regard it should be noted that two planning Page 44
officer posts have recently been filled, one each in Oban, Lorn and the Isles and Helensburgh and Lomond. Once the post holders have fully settled into the work practices and procedures there will be a benefit to the Council which should start to become apparent over the next six months. Additionally a further planning officers post has been advertised for the Oban, Lorn and the Isles area and interviews are likely to be carried out in late November although an appointee is unlikely to be in post until the start of January 2004. The benefits of this post are unlikely to be fully realised until after April 2004 although this post should significantly aid both the overall Council wide and local area performance.
5.0 DECENTRALISED DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PERFORMANCE
5.1 BUTE AND COWAL
As Members will recall, a target of processing 77% of all applications within two months was set by the Area Committee earlier this year.
5.2 In this regard Bute and Cowal has:
• Processed 177 applications in the 6 monthly period. • Processed 124 of these within two months (70%), which represents a figure 7% below target. • Of the 177 applications, 67 were householder applications of which 63 were processed within two months (94%).
5.3 With regards to the above, the Bute and Cowal area team has over the years consistently achieved a high performance within the Council wide area. In 2000/2001 and 2001/02 some 71% of all applications for the year were within the eight-week period.
The area team has a new target of 77% determination of applications within the eight-week period that represented a consolidation of performance. This also allowed for the loss of a small part of the area to the National Park and for the training of the new Area Planning Officer.
The current six monthly performance of 70% is below the target figure of 77%, but subject to full staff stability and lack of any sustained absence that invariably diverts attention, the team remains as committed as ever to improve and consolidate upon performance. As previously indicated the arrival of the new area-planning officer this year requires enhanced working knowledge of the area, procedures and polices. Performance should as a result be consolidated in the next six months.
5.4 HELENSBURGH AND LOMOND
As Members will recall a target of processing 78% of all applications within two months was set by the Area Committee earlier this year.
5.5 In this regard Helensburgh and Lomond has:
• Processed 138 applications in the six month period. • Processed 117 of these within two months (84%), which represents a figure of 6% above target. • Of the 138 applications, 82 were householder applications of which 75 were processed within two months (91%).
5.6 With regards to the above, the full benefits of losing part of the Administrative area to the National Park is now becoming evident, with performance levels well in excess of 80% (Scottish Executive Target). The Helensburgh and Lomond area team is achieving a high level of performance and the recent employment of the replacement Planning Officer, should consolidate this level of performance.
5.7 OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES Page 45
As Members will recall a target of processing 65% of all applications within two months was set by the Area Committee earlier this year.
5.8 In this regard Oban, Lorn and Isles has:
Processed 219 applications in the six month period. Processed 128 of these within two months, (58%), which represents a figure 7% below target. Of the 219 applications, 55 were householder applications of which 49 were processed within two months (89%).
5.9 With regards to the above the degree of stability anticipated in my report in June 2003 has unfortunately not materialised. There has been a continued number of personnel changes within the Area Office, in relation to the number of officers in post, over the past 6 months. This has resulted in only relatively short periods of stability in the Office which has had a direct effect on service delivery and in particular meeting performance targets. This has meant that in some cases more than one officer has dealt with any given application at different stages of its process through the system resulting in an element of duplication of work and consequent inefficiencies. Nonetheless there has been 219 determinations [235 applications received] during that period.
A third planning officer position, soon to be interviewed, should help to provide a much needed additional professional input in dealing with the present and anticipated workload in the Oban area in the coming months."
5.10 MID ARGYLL, KINTYRE AND ISLAY
As Members will recall, a target of processing 66% of all applications within two months was set by the Area Committee earlier this year.
5.11 In this regard Mid Argyll, Kintyre and Islay has:
• Processed 252 applications in the six month period. • Processed 172 of these within two months (68%), which represents a figure of 2% above target. • Of the 252 applications, 63 were householder applications of which 50 were processed within two months (79%).
5.12 With regards to the above, despite the high number of applications received throughout the summer, the area team has consolidated upon its previous ongoing improvement in performance, by exceeding the target set for this six month period. This has been a noteworthy achievement, particularly given the officer time expended on negotiation and responding to pre-application enquiries, which has increased in proportion to the number of applications submitted.
6.0 CONCLUSION
6.1 Whilst overall, performance is below target levels it is hoped that the shortfall, particularly in householder applications, can be recovered over the next six months.
6.2 Similarly, whilst performance is not being achieved overall, two of the decentralised areas are performing above target, with the other two areas not being in an insurmountable situation. With particular regard to Oban, Lorn and the Isles, the employment of an additional Planning Officer will have significant benefits, although as he/she is unlikely to be in post before 2004, the full benefits are unlikely to be realised until after April 2004.
7.0 IMPLICATIONS
Page 46
Policy: Continued monitoring and aiming towards improved levels and consolidation of performance consistent with the Council’s “Best Value” objectives.
Financial: None
Personnel: Two recent Planning Officers have taken up their posts and interviews for a further Officer is taking place during November. It is anticipated that these posts once filled and the personnel having settled in will allow for a period of stability.
Equal Opportunity: None
Angus J Gilmour Head of Planning
Contact: Mr Neil McKay, Development Control Manager (01546) 604172 Page 47 Agenda Item 5a Page 48 Page 49 Page 50
This page is intentionally left blank Page 51 Agenda Item 5b
______
ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL OBAN, LORN & THE ISLES COMMUNITY SERVICES AREA COMMITTEE 3 DECEMBER 2003 ______
EXAMINATION RESULTS 2003 ______
1. SUMMARY
1.1 This report gives details of examination performance across the authority in 2003. Reports from Oban High School, Tobermory High School and Tiree High School are attached as appendices.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 The Committee is asked to note the report and recognise the excellent work of teachers and pupils in achieving these results.
3. DETAIL 3.1 The National Priorities for Education require education authorities to report on certain categories and these are described in the table below:
The Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF) Levels:
Level 3 = Standard Grade at 5-6 (Foundation) plus Access 3 (Higher Still) Level 4 = Standard Grade at 3-4 (General) plus Intermediate 1 at A-C (Higher Still) Level 5 = Standard Grade at 1-2 (Credit) plus Intermediate 2 at A-C (Higher Still) Level 6 = Higher Grades at A-C (Existing exams plus Higher Still) Level 7 = CSYS at A-C plus Advanced Higher (Higher Still)
3.2 Argyll and Bute pupil achievement at S4, S5 and S6.
Category 2002 2003 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 3 or better 96 95 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 4 or better 85 82 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 5 or better 39 39 % of S4 roll gaining 3+ awards at level 6 or better 23 24 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 6 or better 08 10 % of S4 roll gaining 1+ awards at level 7 or better 14 12
In the above table, level 6 represents achievement at the end of S5 and level 7 by the end of S6. There is also another report required under the National Page 52
Priorities framework that requires authorities to report all achievement by the end of S6, i.e. all examination passes are accumulated to give a figure representing achievement of the S$ roll by the end of S6. The following table gives these accumulated results:
3.3 Argyll and Bute pupil achievement by the end of S6.
Category 2002 2003 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 3 or better 96 96 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 4 or better 86 87 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 5 or better 56 53 % of S4 roll gaining 3+ awards at level 6 or better 36 32 % of S4 roll gaining 5+ awards at level 6 or better 22 20 % of S4 roll gaining 1+ awards at level 7 or better 14 12
3.4 Although there are some slight declines in some categories, the general trend is of increased performance. Over half of all S4 pupils will leave school with 5 or more awards at level 5 (the old Standard Grade Credit Level) and almost all pupils leave school with 5 or more awards. National data is not yet available but based on performance in 2002, the authority will remain above the national average.
4. CONCLUSION
4.1 Argyll and Bute schools continue to perform in the top third of authorities in Scotland. The authority is expected to reach its National Priority targets for examination performance by 2005.
5. IMPLICATIONS
Financial: None
Personnel: None
Equal Opportunities: None
Legal: None
Douglas Hendry Director of Community Services Argyll and Bute Council 03/12/2003
Members wishing further information should contact Chris Shirley, Quality Standards Manager, Argyll House, Alexandra Parade, Dunoon, PA23 8AJ Tel: 01369 708528
Page 53
OBAN HIGH SCHOOL 2002-2003 EXAMINATION RESULTS
S4 STANDARD GRADE
LEVEL 3 95% of S4 pupils gained 5 or more Standard Grade at grade 5-6 or higher
LEVEL 4 82% gained 5 or more Standard Grades at 3-4 or higher
LEVEL 5 37% gained 5 or more Standard Grades at 1-2 or higher
S5 RESULTS
LEVEL 6 31% (of S4 roll) gained 3 or more passes at Higher 15% (of S4 roll) gained 5 or more passes at Higher
S6 RESULTS
LEVEL 7 18% of S6 gained 1 or more Advanced Higher
LEVEL 6 27% achieved 5 or more awards at Level 6 (an increase of 6% on 2002 or better)
LEVEL 6 37% achieved 3 or more awards at Level 6 (an increase of 7% on 2002)
LEVEL 6 52% achieved 1 or more awards at Level 6 (an increase of 5% on 2002)
LEVEL 5 59% achieved 5 awards or more at Level 5 or better (an increase of 4% on 2002)
LEVEL 4 90% achieved 5 awards or more at Level 4 or better (the same as 2002)
LEVEL 3 95% achieved 5 awards or more at Level 3 or better (the same as 2002)
SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS IN RELATION TO 2002 AND 2001
S5 Level 6 31% of S5 pupils gained 3 or more passes at Higher – this is our best result yet and represents a 3% increase on 2002 and an 11% increase on 2001
15% of S5 pupils gained 5 passes at Higher – an increase of 2% on 2002 and a 9% increase on 2001
S6 Advanced Higher at 18% has increased by 6% since 2001
S4 all categories down slightly but it is a reflection of a less able year-group with a large number of pupils with learning difficulties and Records of Need
Page 54
This page is intentionally left blank Page 55
Oban, Lorn and The Isles Area Committee Meeting – 3rd December 2003 Tiree High School Examination Results 2003
I am pleased to provide the following observations about the Examination Results for Tiree High in the 2003 SQA Examination Diet.
1. S4 Results at Levels 3,4 and 5 Of total presentations:- 35% gained and award at Level 5 (Credit). 51% gained an Award at Level 4 (General) and 14% gained an Award at Level 3 (Foundation) Only 4% of presentations did not receive an award in the examinations sat.
For individual pupils:- 18% gained 5 or more Awards at Level 5 or better 82% gained 5 or more Awards at Level 4 or better and 100% gained 5 or more Awards at Level 3 or better. All pupils achieved English at Level 3 or better and 82% achieved Maths at Level 3 or better. The results are very much in line with expectations. The very small number of candidates each year can cause considerable fluctuations in results rather than trends. For example, the percentage of candidates gaining 5 or more Awards at Level 5 or better was down in 2003 (18%) compared to 2002 (44%). This would be a difference of 2 candidates. On the basis of expectations for the current S4 I would expect the percentage to increase in 2004.
2. S5 Results at Level 6 8 students sat examinations for Level 6 5 + at A-C = 1 Candidate (11%) 3 + at A-C = 2 Candidates (22%) Total = 3 Candidates (33%) There is no significant variation from the previous two years or from the expected outcome in 2003.
3. S6 Results at Level 7 One student sat an Advanced Higher examination in Physics and was successful.
4. S6 Results at Levels 3-7 Achieving:- 5 or more Awards at Level 3 – 100% 5 or more Awards at Level 4 – 100% 5 or more Awards at Level 5 – 64% 1 or more Awards at Level 6 – 43% 3 or more Awards at Level 6 – 36% 5 or more Awards at Level 6 – 7% 1 or more Awards at Level 7 – 7% For our S6 students their results meant that in every case they acquired the results needed for entry to their chosen courses in F.E. and H.E. cont…/
Page 56
…/continued
I would also like to note that three S6 students studied Distance Learning Courses through Telford College. These courses were mentored by teachers in Tiree High and results were:-
Geography Higher – A German Higher – A Psychology Int 2 - A
It is unfortunate that these results do not show up in the published results as the Presenting Centre was Telford College not Tiree High.
Other Points a) It may be of interest that, against national trends, boys on Tiree have in 3 of the 5 years out performed girls at 5+ Awards at Level 5 although the girls did better at 5+ Awards at Level 4. However, it is dangerous to read too much into this with the small numbers on Tiree. b) It is hoped that the Higher Still courses are now well established and that there will be no major changes, particularly in English courses, in the near future.
I hope this gives a helpful view of the 2003 Examination results for Tiree High.
A. Colin J. Hunter Headteacher 11/11/03 Page 57
Report to Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee
3 December 2003
SQA Examination Results at
Tobermory High School
1. S4 Results: variations from year to year are explained by the size of the group and the level of special needs, which vary from year to year 5+ Level 5 5+ Level 4 5+ Level 3 (5 or more passes (5 or more passes at General (5 or more passes at at Credit) or above) Foundation or above) 59% 73% 52% 93% 95% 100% 97% 95% 100%
2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 • 11 pupils in S4 (a third of the year group) achieved 7 or 8 credit passes • the support provided for pupils by classroom assistants was particularly helpful, as this is a year group with a high proportion of pupils with leaning difficulties.
2. S5 Results: variations from year to year are explained by the size of the group and the level of special needs, which vary from year to year 5+ Level 6 3+ Level 6 1+ Level C (5 or more passes at (3 or more passes at (1 or more passes at Higher “C” or above) Higher “C” or above) Higher “C or above) 3% 3% 14% 21% 38% 50% 64 59 91
2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 2001 2002 2003 • the S5 year group is exceptionally small (22 pupils) but these results, nevertheless represent a real achievement. • pupils with identified special needs are now achieving very well; these results include a pupil with dyslexia who gained four Highers in S5, all “A” and “B” passes
Areas for development • we are working to formalise and refine our pupil/teacher interviews so that each pupil has a clear view of how s/he will achieve her/his personal best. • we aim to increase the number of Higher “A” passes by working on strategies for creating better organised and more independent learners.
To ensure that all pupils achieve their personal best, the school uses: • pupil target setting and review interviews • regular feedback to individuals and groups • after-school study clubs • department and whole staff meetings where teachers discuss pupils’ progress • results analysis meetings each year where each department discusses pupils’ exam results and agrees areas for development
Page 58
This page is intentionally left blank Page 59 Agenda Item 5c
ARGYLL & BUTE COUNCIL Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee COMMUNITY SERVICES December 2003
MULL THEATRE
1. SUMMARY
1.1 The lease on the premises of Mull Theatre’s Little Theatre at Dervaig expires in 2006. The organisation appointed Scottish Cultural Enterprise to carry out a Feasibility Study that outlined an Options and Investment Appraisal relating to future building requirements. Argyll and Bute Council and Argyll and the Islands Enterprise supported this study. Scottish Cultural Enterprise has recommended a new build at the Ledaig waterfront site in Tobermory. In order to obtain support from the Scottish Arts Council Capital Scheme, the organisation will require support from several funding bodies including Argyll and Bute Council.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 The Area Committee recommends that Argyll and Bute Council recognises Mull Theatre as a key cultural service provider in Argyll and Bute and acknowledges its position within the wider cultural community of Scotland.
2.2 That members agree to support, in principle, the Feasibility Study for Mull Theatre and assess future financial implications following the outcome of the initial funding application to the Scottish Arts Council in January 2004.
3. DETAIL
3.1 Mull Theatre is the longest established professional theatre in the Highlands and Islands and is a major visitor attraction on Mull. It produces an acclaimed annual summer programme on Mull of the best and most challenging contemporary and repertory drama, and through a regular touring programme makes a significant contribution to the cultural life of the Highlands and Islands. The theatre has built up a national reputation and is programmed regularly in all Scotland’s main theatres.
3.2 The organisation was awarded Fixed Term Funding from the Scottish Arts Council for three years from 2002, and was the only company to be awarded funding for three years. They are currently in receipt of funding of £217,000 from the Scottish Arts Council for 2003/4.
3.3 The organisation feeds back into the local economy over £100,000 per annum through wages, accommodation, petrol, printing and items for productions.
3.4 The overall cost of the project to relocate the theatre at the Ledaig is in the region of £2.5 million of which 50% will be requested from the Scottish Arts Council. The Study outlines options for Argyll and Bute Council to contribute to the capital project through “in kind” contributions. Page 60
3.5 The proposed setting of the site in Tobermory offers an inspiring location for the chosen architects and through the anticipated publicity generated will increase the image of the island to new visitor audiences, thereby contributing to the local economy as well as increasing employment opportunities. A new build on a prime location will act as a focus for waterfront activity and will complement and add to the existing facilities.
3.6 The new building will be able to offer a broader range of arts and tourist activities and along with An Tobar create an exciting cultural centre in Tobermory. A new home for Mull Theatre would offer the company stability and increase their ability to obtain long-term funding thereby securing their position.
3.7 Eliminating the operational difficulties attached to the Little Theatre in Dervaig and operating from a larger venue in Tobermory, the company would be able to increase their audiences and expand their outreach workshop programme throughout Argyll and Bute.
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 Mull Theatre is one of Argyll and Bute’s “centres of excellence”. Without a new venue in 2007, Mull Theatre will be without a permanent base.
4.2 The theatre continues to contribute to an integrated approach to arts development as outlined in the Arts Development Strategy and Action Plan and provides public benefit.
4.3 Mull Theatre delivers benefits towards several of the Council’s Strategic Objectives: attracting inward investment, the development of indigenous business and cultural tourism.
5. IMPLICATIONS
Policy: The proposal is consistent with the Council’s strategic aims of sustaining the local heritage, promoting civic pride and enhancing the image of the area amongst its own residents Financial: None Personnel: None Equal Opportunities: The new building will meet all requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act
Douglas Hendry Director of Community Services November 17, 2003
For further information contact: Eileen Rae, Arts Development Officer – 01700 502252 LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS
Mull Theatre Feasiblity Study
Page 61 Agenda Item 6a
ARGYLL & BUTE COUNCIL ALL AREA COMMITTEES
OPERATIONAL SERVICES DECEMBER 2003
PLAYING FIELDS STRATEGIC REVIEW
1 SUMMARY
1.1 This report is intended to seek Area Committee Members views prior to presentation to the Strategic Policy Committee, as a first stage of consultation on the draft update of the Councils Playing Fields Development Strategy. This is required in order to bring it into line with the strategic policy of sports governing bodies and to reflect changes in the criteria for match funding of outdoor sports facilities by the major funding bodies. It also contains an update on progress since the previous report and recommendations to ensure the future success of the programme.
2 RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that :
2.1 The Committee endorse the attached “Playing Fields Strategic Review” and its appendices as a Draft Consultation Document for discussion with the appropriate groups and bodies scheduled in Appendices 8.1,8.2,8.3,8.4.
2.2 Argyll and Bute Council adopt a vision of providing every community with access to “all weather sports facilities” centred round its secondary, larger or isolated primary schools, and social inclusion areas in recognition of the high level of rainfall, poor soil conditions and lack of alternative facilities available in the area.
2.3 To maximise their use and durability, each new facility is of high quality and that arrangements are made to ensure these facilities are maintained to a level sufficient to allow their continued use for a period of 30 years or over.
2.4 With the introduction of the Public Private Partnership / NPDO for schools, the specification for outdoor and indoor sports facilities at these locations are agreed urgently, and that the brief for the first phase of projects is compatible with the Playing Fields Strategy for School and Community Facilities.
2.5 There is a continuation of Council funding for the development of Natural Grass Pitches, Synthetic Turf Pitches, Multi Use Games Areas, Changing Accommodation and other external sport and play facilities through the capital programme as adopted in the 1999 Playing Fields Strategic Review.
2.6 Following feedback from the Areas the Stragic Policy Committee adopt the draft Three Year Capital programme for the development of outdoor sports facilities as shown in Appendix 7.2 attached. This programme to be updated on a regular Page 62
basis as detailed information becomes available.
2.7 In view of the very different lead-in times taken by each project partnership, the Playing Fields Development Unit adopts a flexible approach to the project prioritising and positioning detailed in Appendices 7.3 and 7.4 of the Strategic Review.
2.8 The Council is willing, in line with the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003, to enter into partnership agreements, or working relationships with properly constituted groups and organisations, or project steering groups, in order to secure the funding and construction of outdoor sports facilities.
2.9 The Council as a proposed “eligible body” is willing to act as lead partner in making direct applications to sportscotland in line with their “Lottery Fund Strategy Review” referred to in section 4.3 attached and that these applications should be on a prioritised basis.
2.10 The Council is willing to support partners, such as sports clubs and community organisations, who wish to make direct applications to sportscotland’s “Awards for All” category, in conjunction with the Council as relevant major partners. Such applicants will require to demonstrate adequate organisation, demand and resources as it is unlikely that Council match funding will be available to lower priority projects.
3 SCOPE OF THE REPORT
3.1 The “Playing Fields Strategic Review” will update the Strategic Policy Committee on progress since the original review was presented to members on the 10th November 1999.
3.2 It will detail the progress on each of the projects identified in that report and propose future project priorities and targets.
3.3 It will assess the current and projected levels of capital and revenue expenditure required to complete committed projects, those currently under development and projected future targets.
3.4 It will identify changes in funding strategy by the major funding bodies and update the original ways of sourcing funds in both the public and voluntary sectors.
3.5 The review also makes a number of recommendations that will demonstrate a continuing Best Value approach to resolving a number of issues.
4 CURRENT SITUATION
Page 63
4.1 A new database has been developed with the intention of gathering information for asset management, assessment of supply and demand and evaluation of customer satisfaction. The draft format is included in Appendix 1.1 of the Playing Fields Strategic Review - Draft Consultation Document.
4.2 Following the Committee's agreement in 1999 to allocate an additional £100,000 for match funding in addition to existing capital allocations, a great deal of progress has been made. Applications were made to various funds and funding bodies. The Playing Fields Development Unit has been successful in all its summary applications and a number of full sportscotland lottery applications as indicated in Appendices 1.2 and 1.3 of the Strategic Review.
4.3 The current status of each live and completed project is shown in Appendix 1.4 of the review. Projects have been funded from a variety of sources and supported by a variety of partners. The general development process is as outlined below.
4.4 Specification – Much of the work on artificial playing field contracts was relatively new in terms of technology and scope. As a result, the early contracts of this sort were let on a contractor “design and build” basis with minimal specification. Contracts for natural grass drainage projects were specified along traditional lines.
4.5 The Tendering Process – The JCT “design and build” contracts were let in accordance with the Council’s Standing Orders. Comparison and evaluation was difficult as each contractor had a unique system. However, following a long tender evaluation the lowest tender was accepted in all cases thus not requiring the committee's agreement prior to acceptance.
4.6 The Contracts – Overall the capital allocation for each project in the Playing Fields development programme has been adequate. However, a number of early projects exceeded the budget due mainly to deficiencies in the original contract specification. Surprisingly, despite the liquidation of the original contractor, the projected overspend on the contract for the Full Size Synthetic Playing Field at Hermitage Academy is well below the original forecast and should be entirely covered by the Contractors Performance Bond when the final account is settled.
4.7 The Capital Programme - In the current financial year the overall capital allocation will be under-spent due to the failure of our second stage sportscotland bids for the Oban High and Tobermory facilities and the extremely exacting and drawn out process followed by some of the main funding bodies.
4.8 Site Operations – Artificial Pitches. Despite JCT Contract Conditions, detailed contractor design specifications and long periods of tender evaluation, projects demanded a high level of supervision. Although this was expensive in terms of manpower it proved essential in many cases, due to the contractors cover up rate. This ultimately helped to ensure the long-term integrity of the facilities. Page 64
4.9 Site Operations – Natural Grass Pitches. Management of the early natural grass drainage and refurbishment contracts presented difficulties due to weather conditions in the summers of 2001 and 2002 and the number of changes and extras required to the original documentation. These projects are now complete and the tender documentation has been entirely updated. The last project at East King St, Helensburgh went well and was completed without dispute and within budget.
5.0 FUTURE STRATEGY
5.1 Investment - sportscotland Due to the continuing and projected reduction in Lottery Fund Income the future grant aid offered by sportscotland is likely to fall substantially. This could take the form of lower levels of award (presently at £500,000 in the School and Community Strand) or a lower proportion of eligible costs (currently 80% in SIP areas). Even more worrying is the slight hint in the sportscotland Consultation Document that funding could be denied to organisations, which it could be argued, had access to other potential funds.
Each of these changes would make it extremely difficult to secure funding for larger Argyll and Bute projects in future.
5.2 Investment – Other sources Other sources of Lottery match funding have been introduced, such as the New Opportunities Fund for PE and Sport. This however is allocated on the basis of school population and deprivation indices and does not have the philosophy of positive discrimination towards previously excluded rural and island communities, that is evident in sportscotland publications.
The largest financial contribution to sports facilities and their management is still provided through Local Authority Direct Grant but the level of finance is falling and almost all of the money is committed revenue funding. The Capital committed by the Council following the adoption of the 1999 Strategic Review is still a vital component in raising or maintaining the standard of outdoor sports facilities.
5.3 Use of Facilities Due to soil conditions and heavy rainfall in Argyll and Bute, grass pitches are prone to waterlogging. Contrary to public perception, the cost of continually draining and maintaining these grass pitches can be considerable and although they are preferable for some sports, such as football, and necessary for some like rugby, the situation is changing. Almost no hockey is now played on grass and there are a number of surface trials under way with professional football clubs.
The straight choice between natural grasses or an artificial surface is a simple one. In terms of potential use it is clear that an artificial surface, properly drained, can be in almost continual use during daylight hours and that floodlighting can extend this within social hours. A natural grass surface on the other hand can normally only be used between once and three times a week, for formal games, and can be unplayable for weeks and months at a time.
Page 65
There is no doubt about the popularity of synthetic turf as can be seen by the popularity of the facilities at Hermitage Academy, Black Park Dunoon, Tiree HS and Park Primary School, Oban. Though not statistically accurate, the feedback from users is unequivocally supportive.
5.4 The Choice of Surface The original report discussed “sand filled carpets”. Interestingly enough as each project was assessed on its own merits, taking into account the requirements of the user groups, it was concluded that “sand filled carpets” were not always the correct surface for the job. Consequently each of the five “all weather” facilities were allocated different types of synthetic surface. These surfaces range from a polymeric rubberised surface at Lochnell to a “new generation” carpet with sand and rubber crumb infill at Dunoon.
Each surface has advantages and disadvantages and the choice must be made on the basis of the projected use and potential abuse of the facility.
5.5 Quality and Guarantees It became evident during development of the early projects that a quality specification was essential. Since each project had to go through a competitive tendering exercise, adopting a preferred surface turned out to be much more difficult than anticipated. The contracts were issued on a design and build basis to meet BS7044. However, with at least 6 manufacturers and about seven or eight contractors who could carry out the work, it was clearly difficult to ensure that the choice of product, and the guarantees given, were providing a like for like comparison.
This is a growing market but, with few suppliers and contractors, there is a need to be extremely vigilant in terms of specification, performance and value for money.
5.6 Best Value Although ultimately the lowest bid was chosen in each of the tendered projects to date, quality and best value were not compromised. A high quality was specified as it is unlikely that sufficient income generated finance will be available to carry out replacement work in the short term. A lower specification would almost certainly have saved initial investment money but would have impaired the performance and long-term durability of the facility.
For example the boundary fencing was chosen for its strength, and hardwearing qualities. The base construction was designed to have a twenty five-year life span. For the Carpet, long term guarantees and warranties were required to ensure that any failure (other than normal wear and tear) would be repaired under guarantee.
The lighting has been designed to allow flexibility while ensuring the use of electricity is kept to as low a level as is required by the particular activity thus minimising environmental impact and reducing running cost.
Page 66
5.7 Cost It is difficult to forecast overall running and replacement costs with any degree of certainty, but it is ultimately these ongoing costs, which will have a bearing on the charges that have to be levied.
The cost of major replacements, such as a new surface after seven to ten years, are high (about £20-£25 per sqm) and need to be taken into account at an early stage. Sinking funds are being created to ensure that the facility does not cease to function when the surface has to be replaced. Charges are geared to cover major maintenance, replacement costs and running costs such as electricity for lighting.
The most difficult cost to quantify is the relationship of staff costs to usage. Smaller facilities are less cost effective as the staffing ratio to income generated tends to be higher. On large facilities one person could look after 2-3 full size pitches relatively easily and staff costs are therefore lower per game.
It was originally hoped, that while a reasonable level of staff costs have been built in, the shortfall in required hours would be made up by voluntary assistance. This should certainly be the case in small community based facilities but in practice this has not been easy to achieve and there is still some concern over this matter.
5.9 Millennium/Jubilee Playing Fields The Millennium and Jubilee Playing Fields schemes are run by the National Playing Fields Association. The schemes offer the opportunity to safeguard sports fields, play and park areas for future generations in a similar way to the King George V scheme which was introduced to a number of our parks in the 1930’s.
The first Millennium Field in the British Isles was dedicated at the Meadows Campbeltown on 26th October 2000 and other Council projects were to follow. The fields at Dunoon Stadium, Howie Park, Mossfield and Bendarroch, are still to be officially dedicated, and the ceremonies for these require to be organised by Spring 2004 at the latest. Members will be informed as to the exact dates when these have been finalised.
No Jubilee Playing Fields have been dedicated to date and none have been put forward. However, the scheme is still open to applications and although the only financial incentive at this stage is the payment of legal costs, there are a number of funds that may be accessed through the National Playing Fields Association to such facilities.
5.8 Skateboarding/In line skating/BMX Facilities Although not given any serious consideration in the earlier report there appears to be a definite demand for these activities. The Police believe that properly constructed facilities would significantly reduce problems on the roads where the use of skateboards and BMX can endanger both the lives of the public and the participants.
Page 67
These activities are recognised by as “sports” by sportscotland, and merit further consideration. At present no funds have been allocated within the capital programme. Nevertheless there is a case for some match funding to be made available from other Council resources in order to make an impact on those sites where such facilities are deemed to be worthwhile.
5.10 Management - Charges for facilities In general there has been an acceptance of setting a realistic charge especially since the user groups are involved in the management and realise how important it is to produce a break-even budget. Each facility is considered to be a cost centre and therefore needs to set its own budget. It is unlikely that there will be any significant subsidy from the Council after the first year or two
Management Committees, in both the public and voluntary sectors, need to take hard commercial decisions. There is a requirement to ensure that the income covers the future repair and replacement costs, but too high a charge may discourage usage and thus reduce the income.
The overall effect is that similar facilities around the area may have totally different charges depending on how much work they wish to put in to generate extra funding. This additional income will not come easily unless a facility management is lucky enough to persuade a generous benefactor to make a regular donation.
6 PROJECT FUNDING - PRIORITISATION
6.1 External Funding – sportscotland Lottery Fund Argyll and Bute has been fortunate in obtaining sportscotland lottery funding. It is evident that without sportscotland, projects such as the Cowal Community Sports Project and Hermitage Academy Community Sports Facility would either not have taken place, have been much reduced in scale, or might have been delayed for several years.
There is now a firm indication that sportscotland lottery funding will be reduced, and, even although we come up with some very good projects, we will have to compete with many other Local Authorities and voluntary groups. Most, if not all of the projects that we put forward, will at least be eligible to compete within sportscotland’s definition (i.e. pass the first summary stage), but that may be as far as they will go.
The projects most likely to receive sportscotland funding are those that reflect sportscotland and the Sports Council’s objectives. It is therefore recommended that the highest priority rating be given to the full size synthetic pitch at Oban High Community Sports Facility and the proposed smaller synthetic facilities at Tobermory High School. Both projects have been the subject of much work by the Council and Community Groups working in partnership.
Page 68
Other projects justifying the highest priority status are the proposed Synthetic Turf Pitches (STPs) and changing facilities at Rothesay, Lochgilphead, Campbeltown and Islay, which can be very well justified on regional grounds. The projects at Campbeltown and Lochgilphead may also form part of a larger complex involving the proposed swimming pool at Campbeltown and the proposed polymeric athletics track and pitches at Lochgilphead. 6.2 New Opportunities Fund for PE and Sport This source of funding has been the subject of other reports. It has two components – Activities and Facilities and is spread over a period of three years. Both have been the subject of successful stage 1 applications and the facilities projects are to be progressed by the Playing Fields Development Unit.
The list of approved projects is shown in Appendices 1.5 and 1.6. and these may be changed with the agreement of NOF. In view of current problems with the sportscotland applications for Tobermory and Oban it may be necessary to reallocate the top up funding approved for these projects.
6.3 PPP / NPDO Funding Playing field projects need to be tailored to meet the needs at present, while considering the possibilities of future development. There is a need for continual dialogue within the Council and with the community. With the introduction of the Public Private partnership / NPDO for schools, it is important that the need for outdoor and indoor sports facilities are agreed urgently, and the brief for the first projects is in line with the overall strategy for school and community facilities.
Some PFI school projects, in other areas, failed to include this requirement in their brief and the private facility management company have refused access. The New Opportunities Fund project for a fitness suite at Dunoon Grammar School is likely to be incorporated in the PPP / NPDO scheme for the schools replacement but NOF approval and suitable programming difficulties require to be resolved.
6.4 External Funding – Other Funding Bodies It is hoped that the reduction in sportscotland lottery funding can be made up from other sources but this is by no means certain. A change in the rules with respect to Objective 2 European funding means that sports facilities may attract 10-15%, but current sources of funding such as the Foundation for Sport and the Arts appear to be vastly over subscribed.
Funding has been obtained from various other sources but the sums have been low. Argyll and the Isles Enterprise have helped with the funding of the Tiree HS and Lochnell projects. The National Playing Fields via the Robertson Trust contributed £5000 to Lochnell, as did the Gannochy Trust but these sources will never be a substitute for the loss of major funding from sportscotland.
Overall, money is available from various sources, depending on how, to whom, and by whom applications are made, but the sums concerned are low and may require substantial match funding. These sources of funding may be most suited to small local play facilities and kick-about areas.
Page 69
6.5 Council Funding – It is clear that in order to meet demand and expectation the Council must be prepared to fund some projects without sportscotland’s help, possibly with minor funding from other sources such as those above. The initial Playing Fields Development Strategy made money available year on year from the Education and DES capital programmes. It is essential this funding continues in order to match fund Lottery funded projects. Existing Council funding also needs to be optimised and used only where VAT can be reclaimed, as this saves 17.5% of the total project cost.
The Capital Programme should be updated to include the relevant percentage of the value of the highest priority projects shown in Appendices 7.3 & 7.4. This should reflect what is possible if other external funding falls into place, but allow for virement and slippage if it is necessary to increase or reduce the level of the Council’s contribution.
Individual projects need to meet so many funding criteria that there may be times when projects shown in specific years will slip. Other projects in the Capital programme could have their timescales brought forward to take advantage of available opportunities such as last years Scottish Executive slippage money that was used last financial year at Tiree HS and Park Primary School.
7 IMPLICATIONS
7.1 Policy This report develops the policy detailed in the previous Playing Fields Strategic Review and subsequent updates. It has implications for the detailed development of the Education PPP / NPDO.
7.2 Financial – Continuing Capital Investment is required
7.3 Personnel - There will be the opportunity to create additional local employment during the design and construction stages.
7.4 Equal Opportunities - None.
7.5 Legal - Input is required at various stages.
Andrew Law Director of Operational Services
For further information please contact Alan Stuart - tel. 01369 708552.
Page 70
This page is intentionally left blank Page 71 Agenda Item 6b
ARGYLL and BUTE COUNCIL OBAN, LORN and the ISLES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3 DECEMBER 2003
RURAL TRANSPORT GRANT 2004/05
1. SUMMARY
The purpose of this paper is to put forward proposals to be funded by the Rural Transport Grant allocated to the Council by the Scottish Executive and also to seek suggestions for new experimental public transport services from each area committee. These will then be collated, evaluated and ranked against the available funding and presented to the Strategic Policy Committee for approval on 15th January 2004.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
That Members:-
(i) agree the use of Rural Transport Grant to provide the additional public transport services as detailed.
(ii) submit to the Director, Development Services for evaluation, any further suggestions for experimental or enhanced public transport services that could be funded by Rural Transport Grant during financial year 2004/2005.
3. BACKGROUND
For the last six years the Scottish Executive have provided the Council with additional funding for the promotion of rural public transport services within the authority’s area. The settlement figure for 2004/2005 is £466,000 of which the Scottish Executive has allocated £75,000 to Strathclyde Passenger Transport for that part of Helensburgh and Lomond which falls within the SPTA designated area, leaving a balance of £391,000 for services in the remainder of Argyll and Bute. £120,000 of this sum has been used over each of the last five years to support existing services that the Council would have otherwise had to discontinue. A further £13,000 is required to offset budget reduction.
£258,000 remains to continue support for previously authorised projects (section A) and to promote new projects throughout the whole Council area. The Scottish Executive is encouraging Councils to consider, where appropriate, community transport alternatives to conventional scheduled bus services, particularly in remote areas. In
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 1 of 8 21/11/03 Page 72
some cases these types of services may prove to be more cost effective. The recommended new services are described in section B.
In order to gauge the performance of the services provided under the auspices of the Rural Transport Grant, the objective criteria contained in the Council’s Public Transport Guidelines have been applied and appropriate comment is included where applicable. A number of services in section A do not as yet meet the criteria but are achieving growth in terms of patronage, in line with the objectives of the introduction of the Rural Transport Grant and it is proposed that these services continue to be supported. It is proposed that, as in previous years, those experimental services not achieving growth be discontinued and replaced by others of an experimental nature. No such services have been withdrawn during year 2003/04.
It should be noted that some of the costs shown below are estimates.
4. RURAL TRANSPORT GRANT EXPENDITURE 2004/2005.
Section A. Services and projects in operation or approved previously which it is recommended be continued.
SERVICE: Ardrishaig/Lochgilphead and Oban (serving Oban, Lorn and the Isles and Mid Argyll, Kintyre and Islay areas) DESCRIPTION: Enhanced service and route development following withdrawal of service by Scottish Citylink Coaches Ltd. COST: £9,300 per annum but subject to review January 2004. COMMENCED: Three-year commitment from 21st July 2002 COMMENTS : Prior to July 2002 the service on this route consisted of a return journey from Ardrishaig to Oban, daily during the summer and on four days a week during the winter, operated by Scottish Citylink Coaches Ltd. In addition to this a journey operated from Oban to Lochgilphead and return on school days only. During the winter when schools were on holiday there were days when there was no service on the route.
Following Citylink’s withdrawal from the route at the end of May 2002 and the expiry of the existing contract with West Coast Motors for the school day service, tenderers were invited to submit proposals to enhance the service. By improved vehicle utilisation West Coast Motors were able to offer a service of four journeys each way per day on school days and two journeys each way on Saturdays and during school holidays. Most of the costs have been absorbed within the main budget leaving the above sum to be covered from Rural Transport Grant. This is a three-year project designed to provide a stable timetable in order to generate traffic between Oban and Lochgilphead and the intermediate villages.
The service has been well promoted by both the Council and the contractor and initial results seem promising. Average passenger numbers per four weekly period for the 40 weeks prior to service enhancement (up to 13th July 2002) were 734. The average for the
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 2 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 73
same period in 2002/2003 to 12th July 2003 was 1,315 per four weekly period and for the last 16 weeks to 1st November 2003 the average was 1,710 per four weekly period. A clear pattern of growth is emerging. For the year to 1st November 2003, 18,966 passengers were carried compared with 11,622 for the previous year to 2nd November 2002. The subsidy per passenger is £1.69, well below the guideline criteria figure of £3.50. With continued promotion of the service and infrastructure improvements it is hoped that growth may continue.
SERVICE: Oban and Fort William winter service CONTRACTOR: Scottish Citylink Coaches Ltd. DESCRIPTION: Winter service from beginning of October 2004 to end of May 2005 COST: Estimate of £17,850, shared with Highland Council, each Council contributing an estimated £8,925. COMMENCES: Beginning of October 2004. COMMENTS : It is assumed that Scottish Citylink Coaches Ltd will advise both Argyll and Bute and Highland Council that the service on this strategic route will require financial support throughout the winter of 2004/05. The summer service is operated commercially. A “de minimis” payment is the most economic method of supporting the service in the short term and ensuring continuation. The winter service for 2003/04 for which support was agreed in January 2003 commenced on 6th October 2003. We have asked the company for a report on revenue and patronage for the winter of 2002/03 so that we can assess whether or not the service complies with the Council’s guideline criteria on the provision of tendered bus services.
SERVICE: Oban and Gallanachmore CONTRACTOR: Oban & District Buses DESCRIPTION: Mondays to Saturdays, two return journeys daily, May to September. COST: £3,210.96 per annum but subject to review January 2004. COMMENCED: To operate peak summer only, 21st May to 24th September 2004 COMMENTS: During the summer of 2003 this service carried 739 passengers at a subsidy per passenger of £4.35 per passenger. This figure is still in excess of the guideline criteria figure of £3.50 per passenger. However, it should be noted that passenger numbers on this service increased by 26.8% from the previous year and that patronage has increased each season the service has operated. Previous figures are as follows. In 2002, 583 passengers were carried. 2001, 581 passengers were carried. 2000, 456 passengers were carried. The service is designed to serve the island of Kerrera, which is popular with walkers and provides a link between the Kerrera ferry and Oban town centre. The route extends to Oban Caravan and Camping Park and there are also occasional intermediate passengers. The service is valued and as can be seen it has shown modest growth since its inception. The owners of the campsite, the Kerrera ferry operator and the Kerrera bunkhouse owner all play their part in promoting the service.
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 3 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 74
SERVICE: Ferry Service - Tobermory and Kilchoan / Drimnin / Sunart CONTRACTOR: Sound of Mull Transport Group DESCRIPTION: Continuation of the project to provide year round ferry services between Tobermory and Kilchoan / Drimnin / Sunart COST: £2,000 COMMENTS: CalMac will be providing the winter service between Tobermory and Kilchoan for the next four years but this does not include the links to Drimnin and Sunart. Sound of Mull Transport Group have won limited funding for continuation of their services. The Council gave £1,000 of Rural Transport Grant to this project last year. However, this was later increased to £2,000 when, along with the Highland Council and the Scottish Executive additional funding was given to make up the shortfall created when a separate grant application made by the Group to another body was unsuccessful.
Given the failure of that particular application it is very likely that the Group will approach the Council for financial assistance in order to maintain their services. It is recommended that funding from the Council be conditional on the Group providing regular information on revenue and patronage in much the same way as is expected of the Council’s bus contractors. The Group have been asked to supply Revenue and patronage figures for last year’s operation.
SERVICE: West Highland Railway Line Timetable Enhancements CONTRACTOR: ScotRail through the Highland Rail Partnership DESCRIPTION: Additional train services between Dalmally and Oban COST: £3,000 contribution from Argyll and Bute towards total. COMMENTS: Last summer, The Highland Rail Partnership, a body funded by the Rail Industry, Local Authorities (including Argyll and Bute), Local Enterprise Companies and Voluntary Groups was successful in persuading ScotRail to run the following additional services.
The enhancements were as follows: -
Saturdays 1020 Glasgow – Oban and 1545 return – extend from summer timetable (24 May – 27 September) to run 29 March – 25 October = 12 additional days.
Sundays 1240 Glasgow – Oban and 1235 return – extend from summer timetable and October (18 May – 28 October) to run from 30 March = 7 additional days.
Sundays 1205 Fort William – Mallaig and 1815 return, 1240 Glasgow – Mallaig and 1030 return – extend from high summer (29 June – 21 September) to run throughout summer timetable from 18 May = 6 additional days.
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 4 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 75
Sunday is now the second busiest day for travel across the UK and short breaks and second holidays are becoming increasingly popular. These new services extend the summer season beyond the historically short summer timetable, making the West Highlands more accessible for day and weekend trips. Although there has as yet been no official report from ScotRail the general opinion is that these additional trains attracted reasonable patronage and there is a hope that ScotRail may now be in a position to operate them without assistance next summer.
If this is the case the Highland Rail Partnership could then turn its attention to making better use of the rail resources at Oban and operate additional journeys between either Taynuilt and Oban or Dalmally and Oban. This could possibly be achieved in much the same way as last summer’s experiment.
SERVICE: Oban and Easdale – Additional services CONTRACTOR: Oban & District Buses DESCRIPTION: Service enhancements to produce a more regular service suited to the needs of the community. COST: £21,766.75 COMMENCED: 17th February 2003 COMMENTS: Following discussions with the local Community Councils a revised timetable was drawn up and introduced from 17th February 2003. The enhanced timetable provides a consistent level of service on school days, school holidays and Saturdays whereas prior to its introduction there was only a reasonable service on schooldays. On school holidays and on Saturdays there were only two journeys per day.
The service has been well promoted by both the Council and the contractor and initial results seem promising. Average passenger numbers per four weekly period for the year prior to service enhancement were 494. The average for the period 17th February to 1st November 2003 was 1,022 per four weekly period and for the last 16 weeks to 1st November 2003 the average was 1,150 per four weekly period. A clear pattern of growth is emerging. For the year to 1st November 2003 10,861 passengers were carried compared with 6,563 for the previous year to 2nd November 2002. The subsidy per passenger is £3.51, almost at the guideline criteria figure of £3.50. With continued promotion of the service and infrastructure improvements it is hoped that growth may continue.
SERVICE: Oban and Perth – Summer coach service DESCRIPTION: Continuation of this new cross country coach service funded jointly by Argyll and Bute Council, Stirling Council and Perth and Kinross Council COST: £7,980 estimate from each of three local authorities involved in the proposal. COMMENTS: This service operated for the first time during the 2003 summer season. Some have referred to this service as a missing link, a cross-country
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 5 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 76
route allowing travel between east and west without the need to travel via Glasgow. The Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority expressed support for the service in that they saw a need for East – West links at the north end of the National Park including Crianlarich, Lochearnhead and Killin. Through having a direct link, Oban becomes a more attractive destination by public transport from Perth, Dundee and Aberdeen. Students from the Oban and Lorn area have easier access to Aberdeen and Dundee. The population who have direct access to the service is over 22,400, excluding Perth. The route serves a well-established tourist area in particular, Perth, Crieff, Killin and Oban. These four locations which are en route also have tourist information centres. Oban is the main terminal for ferry services to Mull, Iona, Coll, Tiree and Colonsay as well as for ferry services to Barra and South Uist. There is also a summer link to Islay on Wednesdays and Saturdays.
The final report on the first season’s operation is still awaited from Scottish Citylink Coaches. Initial indications are that the service performed satisfactorily and subject to some continuing level of support from the participating Councils there is a desire that it operate again next summer. Negotiations will be undertaken with the other authorities
SERVICE: Cuan Ferry – additional vehicular sailings Summer 2003 DESCRIPTION: Car ferry sailings to operate in the evenings and on Sundays as they did in the latter part of summer 2002. COST: £11,500 COMMENTS: During 2003 the summer period was extended to 16 weeks to cover Whitsun and two weeks beyond the August Bank Holiday. During this period all Friday and Saturday evening sailings after 1930 and all sailings on Sundays were vehicular. These enhancements were subject to negotiation of hours and rosters with the existing ferry crew and the availability of an additional crewmember. The Area Roads Manager, who is responsible for the operation of this ferry, will report on how the additional facilities performed.
SERVICE: Lismore and Port Appin Ferry DESCRIPTION: Enhanced timetable COST: £7,000 COMMENTS: The previous local member was to consult with Lismore Community Council in order to ascertain local aspirations for timetable improvements. The Area Roads Manager, who is responsible for the operation of this ferry, will report on progress.
Section B. New services or projects.
In addition to the foregoing proposals (if all are accepted for continuance) and after allowing for an equitable distribution of Rural Transport Grant between areas, a sum of approximately
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 6 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 77
£20,000 may be available for further initiatives in the Oban, Lorn and the Isles area. This will be dependent upon the final costs of the foregoing projects.
The following projects are recommended for consideration and evaluation: -
Use of community transport, Council minibus or a private contractor to provide a “demand responsive” evening service on two or three evenings each week between Tobermory and Salen or Dervaig. This suggestion came from a delegate to the recent Young Scot conference held in Lochgoilhead.
Estimated cost £5,000
To improve access to Kerrera and as a result of a substantial growth in traffic the operator of the Kerrera Ferry is seeking to extend the length of his vessel and modify the engine mountings at a cost of between £8,000 and £9,000. In addition to his own contribution a grant application has been made to Argyll and the Isles Enterprise and a request has now been made to the Council for a contribution of £3,000 towards the work.
Estimated cost £3,000
A study was recently carried out, the purpose of which was to identify means to improve access to health and other public services for the residents of Argyll and Bute. The report considered three case study areas, one of which was Dalmally where lack of direct public transport to the new GP surgery was highlighted. Further work is to be carried out here with a view to providing cost effective demand responsive public transport through a community transport project or Council minibus.
Estimated cost £5,000
Modest improvements to Sunday services in Oban, which are currently limited to one, bus operating one shift and attempting to serve Dunollie, Soroba and Benderloch.
Estimated cost £5,000
Provision of a late evening service between Oban and Ellenabeich. There is already a suitable departure from Ellenabeich and North Cuan that can bring people into Oban for the evening. A return journey from Oban later in the evening could be provided either Monday to Saturday or Friday and Saturday only depending on availability of funding.
Estimated cost £7,5000
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 7 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 78
Increase the frequency of the bus service between Oban and Dunbeg from hourly to half hourly. The current contractor, Oban & District Buses feels that there is sufficient potential patronage to provide a trial for a year.
Estimated cost £15,000
Members are also invited to submit any other suggestions for public transport enhancements in the area. These should be submitted to the Director, Development Services by 5th December 2003.
5. IMPLICATIONS
5.1 Policy – Consistent with Council’s core policy of providing access.
5.2 Financial – Cost contained within the Rural Transport Grant.
5.3 Personnel – None
5.4 Equal Opportunities – None
5.5 Legal – None.
For further information please contact B. Fletcher (01546 604643).
F:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\7\AI00012705\CommRepoAreasRTGOLI1203V11.doc 8 of 8 21 November, 2003
Page 79 Agenda Item 6c Page 80 Page 81 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 9 Agenda Item 9a of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 82
This page is intentionally left blank Page 83 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10a of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 84
This page is intentionally left blank Page 85 Page 86
This page is intentionally left blank Page 87 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10b of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 88
This page is intentionally left blank Page 89 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 94
This page is intentionally left blank Page 95 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10c of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 96
This page is intentionally left blank Page 97 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 98
This page is intentionally left blank Page 99 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10d of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 100
This page is intentionally left blank Page 101 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 102
This page is intentionally left blank Page 103 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10e of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 104
This page is intentionally left blank Page 105 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 108
This page is intentionally left blank Page 109 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10f of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 112
This page is intentionally left blank Page 113 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 13 Agenda Item 10h of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 114
This page is intentionally left blank Page 115 Agenda Item 11a
ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL OBAN, LORN & THE ISLES AREA COMMITTEE LEGAL AND PROTECTIVE 3 SEPTEMBER 2003 SERVICES
EXECUTION OF DEEDS
1. SUMMARY
1.1 The purpose of this Report is to inform the Committee of all formal deeds and documents relating to the Committee’s area executed between 23rd August 2003 and 19th November 2003.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 The Committee note the terms of this report.
3. DETAIL
3.1 The formal deeds and documents executed on behalf of the Council which relate to the Committee’s area are as detailed on the Schedule annexed hereto.
4. IMPLICATIONS
Policy: None
Financial: None
Personnel: None
Equal Opportunity: None
Susan Mair Head of Legal and Protective Services 19th November 2003
For further information contact: Donald Kelly, Chief Solicitor, Conveyancing & Contracts, Tel: 01546 604221
Page 116
This page is intentionally left blank Page 117 NOT FOR PUBLICATION by virtue of paragraph(s) 6 of Schedule 7A of the Local Government(Scotland) Act 1973
Document is Restricted Page 118
This page is intentionally left blank