Archaeology As Anthropology Author(S): Lewis R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archaeology As Anthropology Author(S): Lewis R Archaeology as Anthropology Author(s): Lewis R. Binford Source: American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Oct., 1962), pp. 217-225 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/278380 Accessed: 15-08-2017 04:16 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Antiquity This content downloaded from 128.227.133.130 on Tue, 15 Aug 2017 04:16:26 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms ARCHAEOLOGY AS ANTHROPOLOGY LEWIS R. BINFORD ABSTRACT ties and differences characteristic of the entire It is argued that archaeology has made few contribu- spatial-temporal span of man's existence (for tions to the general field of anthropology with regard to discussion, see Kroeber 1953). Archaeology has explaining cultural similarities and differences. One certainly made major contributions as far as major factor contributing to this lack is asserted to be the tendency to treat artifacts as equal and comparable traits explication is concerned. Our current knowl- which can be explained within a single model of culture edge of the diversity which characterizes the change and modification. It is suggested that "material range of extinct cultural systems is far superior culture" can and does represent the structure of the total to the limited knowledge available fifty years cultural system, and that explanations of differences and ago. Although this contribution is "admirable" similarities between certain classes of material culture are inappropriate and inadequate as explanations for such and necessary, it has been noted that archae- observations within other classes of items. Similarly, ology has made essentially no contribution in change in the total cultural system must be viewed in an the realm of explanation: "So little work has adaptive context both social and environmental, not been done in American archaeology on the ex- whimsically viewed as the result of "influences," "stim- planatory level that it is difficult to find a name uli," or even "migrations" between and among geographi- cally defined units. for it" (Willey and Phillips 1958: 5). Three major functional sub-classes of material culture Before carrying this criticism further, some are discussed: technomic, socio-technic, and ideo-technic, statement about what is meant by explanation as well as stylistic formal properties which cross-cut these must be offered. The meaning which explana- categories. In general terms these recognized classes of tion has within a scientific frame of reference is materials are discussed with regard to the processes of change within each class. simply the demonstration of a constant articula- Using the above distinctions in what is termed a sys- tion of variables within a system and the meas- temic approach, the problem of the appearance and chang- urement of the concomitant variability among ing utilization of native copper in eastern North America the variables within the system. Processual is discussed. Hypotheses resulting from the application of the systemic approach are: (1) the initial appearance change in one variable can then be shown to re- of native copper implements is in the context of the pro- late in a predictable and quantifiable way to duction of socio-technic items; (2) the increased produc- changes in other variables, the latter changing in tion of socio-technic items in the late Archaic period is turn relative to changes in the structure of the related to an increase in population following the shift system as a whole. This approach to explanation to the exploitation of aquatic resources roughly coincident with the Nipissing high water stage of the ancestral Great presupposes concern with process, or the opera- Lakes; (3) this correlation is explicable in the increased tion and structural modification of systems. It selective pressures favoring material means of status com- is suggested that archaeologists have not made munication once populations had increased to the point major explanatory contributions to the field of that personal recognition was no longer a workable basis for differential role behavior; (4) the general shift in later anthropology because they do not conceive of periods from formally "utilitarian" items to the manufac- archaeological data in a systemic frame of ture of formally "nonutilitarian" items of copper is ex- reference. Archaeological data are viewed par- plicable in the postulated shift from purely egalitarian to ticularistically and "explanation" is offered in increasingly nonegalitarian means of status attainment. terms of specific events rather than in terms of process (see Buettner-Janusch 1957 for discus- IT HAS BEEN aptly stated that "American sion of particularism). archaeology is anthropology or it is nothing" Archaeologists tacitly assume that artifacts, (Willey and Phillips 1958: 2). The purpose of regardless of their functional context, can be this discussion is to evaluate the role which the treated as equal and comparable "traits." Once archaeological discipline is playing in furthering differences and similarities are "defined" in the aims of anthropology and to offer certain terms of these equal and comparable "traits," suggestions as to how we, as archaeologists, may interpretation proceeds within something of a profitably shoulder more responsibility for fur- theoretical vacuum that conceives of differences thering the aims of our field. and similarities as the result of "blending," Initially, it must be asked, "What are the aims "directional influences," and "stimulation" be- of anthropology?" Most will agree that the inte- tween and among "historical traditions" defined grated field is striving to explicate and explain largely on the basis of postulated local or re- the total range of physical and cultural similari- gional continuity in the human populations. 217 This content downloaded from 128.227.133.130 on Tue, 15 Aug 2017 04:16:26 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 218 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [ VOL. 28, No. 2, 1962 I suggest that this undifferentiated andadapt un- the human organism, conceived generi- structured view is inadequate, that artifacts cally, hav- to its total environment both physical and ing their primary functional context in different social. operational sub-systems of the total cultural Within sys- this framework it is consistent to view tem will exhibit differences and similarities diff- technology, those tools and social relationships erentially, in terms of the structure of the cultur- which articulate the organism with the physical al system of which they were a part. Further, environment, as closely related to the nature that the temporal and spatial spans within and of the environment. For example, we would not between broad functional categories will vary expect to find large quantities of fishhooks with the structure of the systematic relationships among the recent archaeological remains from between socio-cultural systems. Study of these the Kalahari desert! However, this view must differential distributions can potentially yield not be thought of as "environmental determin- valuable information concerning the nature of ism" for we assume a systematic relationship social organization within, and changing rela- between the human organism and his environ- tionships between, socio-cultural systems. In ment in which culture is the intervening varia- short, the explanation of differences and similar- ble. In short, we are speaking of the ecological ities between archaeological complexes must be system (Steward 1955: 36). We can observe offered in terms of our current knowledge of the certain constant adaptive requirements on the structural and functional characteristics of cul- part of the organism and similarly certain adap- tural systems. tive limitations, given specific kinds of environ- Specific "historical" explanations, if they can ment. However, limitations as well as the po- be demonstrated, simply explicate mechanisms tential of the environment must be viewed of cultural process. They add nothing to the always in terms of the intervening variable in explanation of the processes of cultural change the human ecological system, that is, culture. and evolution. If migrations can be shown to With such an approach we should not be have taken place, then this explication presents surprised to note similarities in technology an explanatory problem; what adaptive circum- among groups of similar levels of social com- stances, evolutionary processes, induced the mi- plexity inhabiting the boreal forest (Spauld- gration (Thompson 1958: 1)? We must seek ing 1946) or any other broad environmental explanation in systemic terms for classes of his- zone. The comparative study of cultural sys- torical events such as migrations, establishment tems with variable technologies in a similar en- of "contact" between areas previously isolated, vironmental range or similar technologies in etc. Only then will we make major contribu- differing environments is a major methodology tions in the area of
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study of the Swennes Woven Nettle Bag and Weaving Techniques
    Karoll UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research XII (2009) A Comparative Study of the Swennes Woven Nettle Bag and Weaving Techniques Amy Karol Faculty Sponsors: Dr. Connie Arzigian and Dr. David Anderson, Department of Sociology and Archaeology ABSTRACT During recent years, the Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center (MVAC) has acquired permission to look at a beautifully preserved bag from 47Lc84, a rockshelter located in La Crosse County, Wisconsin. The bag is tentatively dated to the Oneota cultural tradition (A.D. 1250-1650) based on pottery sherds associated with it. Nothing of its kind has been found archaeologically in this region before, owing mostly to poor preservation conditions. Due to its uniqueness, there is nothing to compare it to within the Oneota tradition. Therefore, to gain a better understanding of this bag, a cross-cultural study was undertaken. This paper examines separate sites in the American Midwest, as well as textile impressions that are preserved on pottery, the ethnohistoric and early historic record, and modern hand-weaving techniques to determine the textile tradition from which the bag may have emerged as well as how it was constructed. INTRODUCTION Textiles in the archaeological record are poorly preserved in the American Midwest. Only in very few sites are they actually found, and in even fewer are the fragments large enough to be studied in depth. Detailed studies conducted on textiles are not numerous. Lacking in these studies is a cross-cultural comparison of types and materials from sites that do have better preserved textiles to try and determine similarities and differences in textile manufacture.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey of the Chesapeake Bay Shorelines Associated with Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 23221 2003 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Virginia Department of Historic Resources Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Author: Darrin L. Lowery Chesapeake Bay Watershed Archaeological Research Foundation 5264 Blackwalnut Point Road, P.O. Box 180 Tilghman, MD 21671 2003 ii ABSTRACT This report summarizes the results of an archaeological survey conducted along the Atlantic shorelines of both Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia. Accomack and Northampton Counties represent the southernmost extension of the Delmarva Peninsula. The study area encompasses all of the lands adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean and shorelines associated with the back barrier island bays. A shoreline survey was conducted along the Atlantic Ocean to gauge the erosion threat to the archaeological resources situated along the shoreline. Archaeological sites along shorelines are subjected to numerous natural processes which hinder site visibility and limit archaeological interpretations. Summaries of these natural processes are presented in this report. The primary goal of the project was to locate, identify, and record any archaeological sites or remains along the Atlantic seashore that are threatened by shoreline erosion. The project also served as a test of a prehistoric site predictive/settlement model that has been utilized during other archaeological surveys along the Chesapeake Bay shorelines and within the interior sections of the Delmarva Peninsula. The prehistoric site predictive/settlement model is presented in detail using archaeological examples from Maryland and Virginia’s Eastern Shore.
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible Beadmaker's Kit from North America's Lake Superior Copper District
    BEADS: Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers Volume 6 Volume 6 (1994) Article 6 1-1-1994 A Possible Beadmaker's Kit from North America's Lake Superior Copper District Susan R. Martin Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/beads Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Repository Citation Martin, Susan R. (1994). "A Possible Beadmaker's Kit from North America's Lake Superior Copper District." BEADS: Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers 6: 49-60. Available at: https://surface.syr.edu/beads/ vol6/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in BEADS: Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers by an authorized editor of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A POSSIBLE BEA:PMAKER'S KIT FROM NORTH AMERICA'S LAKE SUPERIOR COPPER DISTRICT Sus an R. Martin Beads of copper are amongst the oldest and most wide­ found. In addition, there is some evidence that the spread ornaments known in North America. Native copper material was traded far to the east and south of its was an important material to prehistoric Americans, and most-abundant Great Lakes source in very early times. certainly the most important metal. It was collected, trans­ Other copper sources are known from Nova Scotia, ported and traded over wide areas as early as 7000 years New Jersey, the Appalachians and the American before present, and its use for ornaments persisted until it was gradually replaced by European metals over the many Southwest (Rapp et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Historical Report
    Phase I Archaeological Investigations of Areas of Meacham Family Trust Property, Village of Howard, Brown County, Wisconsin Prepared By: Jennifer R. Harvey, M.A., Principal Investigator Great Lakes Archaeological Research Center, Inc. P.O. Box 511549 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203 Prepared For: Village of Howard ATTN: Geoff Farr, Village Engineer 1336 Cornell Road Green Bay, WI 54313 (920) 434-4060 GLARC ROI 737 GLARC Project No. 10.025 © May 2010, Great Lakes Archaeological Research Center, Inc. Management Summary In April 2010, Great Lakes Archaeological Research Center (GLARC) conducted Phase I archaeological investigations of the Meacham Family Trust property in the Village of Howard, Brown County, Wisconsin. Archaeological investigations were conducted for the Village of Howard in advance of potential future development of the parcel. The archaeological study partially fulfill requirements obtaining from the execution of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-665) as amended and 36 CFR, Part 800, which serves to implement the Act as well as Wisconsin Statutes 44.40 and 157.70. Investigations of the project area were conducted in two stages. The first stage consisted of a comprehensive archival and literature review to identify and document previously reported archaeological and burial sites within one mile of the project area. The second stage of investigations consisted of archaeological survey of those portions of the project area potentially affected by ground disturbing activities. Archaeological survey consisted of close interval surface collection. No historic properties, archaeological sites, or cultural materials were identified as a result of archaeological investigations. As proposed project development will not adversely affect the cultural resource base of the project area, it is recommended that construction be allowed to proceed as designed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Program
    Midwest Archaeological Conference November 4-6, 2015 - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Presentation Abstracts (Listed in Alphabetical order) [6] The Susceptibility of Wyandotte Chert to High Power Use-Wear Analysis ROBERT E. AHLRICHS (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) and KATHERINE STERNER-MILLER (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) During the Late Archaic to Early Woodland transition, caches of blue gray chert bifaces were deposited throughout the Midwest, often in association with burials. The types of analyses that can be conducted on these bifaces are restricted by NAGPRA. Specifically, cleaning of artifacts deemed necessary to conduct high power use-wear analysis is prohibited. An experiment testing three progressive levels of washing demonstrates that Wyandotte chert is fine-grained enough to display surface polishes from use even without intensive washing. The positive results of this experiment are then applied a sample of bifaces from the Riverside site in Michigan’s Upper Peninsu- la. [13] The Lichliter Site Project: A Model for Revealing Hidden Archaeological Collec- tions SARAH M. AISENBREY and WILLIAM E. KENNEDY (Dayton Society of Natural History) The DSNH is cataloging a large collection of archaeological artifacts from the Lichliter site, excavated in the 1960s, near Dayton, Ohio. The materials are from the Late Woodland, a poorly known time period in Ohio prehistory. Despite wide interest, no other professional had ever seen the artifacts, maps, or notes until the collection was returned in 2012. To accomplish deciphering and cataloging the site collection into a meaningful, cross-referenced database, the DSNH staff trained on QLC’s ArcheoLINK software. This project will serve as the first case study in applying ArcheoLINK as a collection management solution for archaeological research collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of the Minnesota Archaeologist
    Bibliography of The Minnesota Archaeologist This list of all authors and titles published in our journal, The Minnesota Archaeologist, since its inception was prepared by MAS member and volunteer extraordinaire Randy Blasus. Our many thanks for such a useful effort. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Adams, Z. G. (ed.) 1951 Indian Village at Fort Berthold (reprint) 17(1, January):3-9 Anderson, Dean 1985 Book Review: "A Toast to the Fur Trade: A Picture Essay on its Material Culture" By Robert C. Wheeler 44(1, Spring/Summer):47-48 Anfinson, John O. 1987 Book Review: "Fort Snelling: Colossus of the Wilderness" by Steve Hall 46(2):67-68 Anfinson, Scott F. 1982 A Bibliography of Lloyd Wilford 41(1, Spring/Summer):75-78 1982 Faunal Remains from the Big Slough Site (21 MU 1) and Woodland Cultural Stability in Southwestern Minnesota 41(1, Spring/Summer):53-71 1984 Cultural and Natural Aspects of Mound Distribution in Minnesota 43(1, Spring/Summer):3-30 1987 Investigations at Two Oneota Sites in the Center Creek Locality 46(1):31-45 1988 Editorial 47(2):2-3 1989 Archaeology of the Central Minneapolis Riverfront Part 1: Historical Overview and Archaeological Potentials 48(1 & 2):1-160 1990 Archaeology of the Central Minneapolis Riverfront Part 2: Archaeological Explorations and Interpretive Potentials 49(1 & 2):i-143 Anfinson, Scott F. & Leslie D. Peterson 1979 Minnesota's Highway Archaeological Programs 38(2, May):86-104 Anonymous 1935 Investigating Mound Builders (reprint) 1(3, August):4-5 1935 The Hardening of Copper (excerpt reprint) 1(6, November):9 1936 Forgotten Coppersmiths (excerpt reprint from Skillings Mining Review) 2:(3, March)9-10 1936 La Verendrye's Journal (excerpt reprint) 2(10, October):7-10 1942 The Migration Routes Of the Cheyenne 8(3, July):124-125 1942 In Memoriam - M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Evidence for Diet and Food
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2015 Vertebrate Evidence for Diet and Food-processing at the Multicomponent Finch Site (47 JE-0902) in Jefferson County, Southeastern Wisconsin Zachary Ryan Stencil University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Stencil, Zachary Ryan, "Vertebrate Evidence for Diet and Food-processing at the Multicomponent Finch Site (47 JE-0902) in Jefferson County, Southeastern Wisconsin" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 843. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/843 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VERTEBRATE EVIDENCE FOR DIET AND FOOD-PROCESSING AT THE MULTICOMPONENT FINCH SITE (47 JE-0902) IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN by Zachary R. Stencil A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2015 ABSTRACT VERTEBRATE EVIDENCE FOR DIET AND FOOD-PROCESSING AT THE MULTICOMPONENT FINCH SITE (47 JE-0902) IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN by Zachary R. Stencil The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2015 Under the Supervision of Dr. Jean Hudson The focus of this study is the intrasite analysis of the vertebrate faunal assemblage from the Finch Site. The Finch Site (47JE-0902) is located in Jefferson County, southeastern Wisconsin, roughly one mile east from Lake Koshkonong’s southeastern shoreline and the Rock River drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Littlefork Burial: New Light on Old Copper
    Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science Volume 37 Number 1 Article 4 1970 The Littlefork Burial: New Light on Old Copper Jack Steinbring University of Winnipeg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/jmas Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Steinbring, J. (1970). The Littlefork Burial: New Light on Old Copper. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science, Vol. 37 No.1, 8-15. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/jmas/vol37/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science by an authorized editor of University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANTHROPOLOGY The Littlefork Burial: New Light on Old Copper JACK STEINBRING* ABSTRACT - A richly furnished child burial of late Old Copper affiliation in Northern Minnesota is described. The mortuary offerings include a pair of large, decorated bone harpoons, and a pair of diagnostic Old Copper projectile points attached to dart shafts. The primary burial is flexed in a shallow pit with evidence of red ochre. Typological comparisons suggest a tentative date of 1,000 to 750 B.C. Seventeen years ago a discovery was made west of In­ I know that a person is not allowed to dig in graves, ternational Falls, Minnesota which might well have al­ etc., but the next high water would probably have washed this away anyhow. tered historical trends in the study of Old Copper had I have kept the wood fibers that were in the arrowhead the find become known previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Mining on Isle Royale 6500
    HOL0010.1177/0959683614557574The HolocenePompeani et al. 557574research-article2014 Research paper The Holocene 2015, Vol. 25(2) 253 –262 Copper mining on Isle Royale 6500– © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav 5400 years ago identified using sediment DOI: 10.1177/0959683614557574 geochemistry from McCargoe Cove, hol.sagepub.com Lake Superior David P Pompeani,1 Mark B Abbott,1 Daniel J Bain,1 Seth DePasqual2 and Matthew S Finkenbinder1 Abstract Isle Royale, in Lake Superior, contains evidence of indigenous copper mining; however, the timing and geographical extent of mining activity is poorly known. We analyzed metal, carbon, nitrogen, and organic matter concentrations to document past mining pollution in sediment cores recovered from McCargoe Cove; a long, narrow inlet of Lake Superior on Isle Royale that receives drainage from a watershed that contains numerous ancient copper mines. At McCargoe Cove, concentrations of lead, copper, and potassium increase in the sediments after AD 1860 and between 6500 and 5400 years before AD 1950 (yr BP). Metal pollution increases at McCargoe Cove exceed natural (or background) levels and coincide with radiocarbon dates associated with copper artifacts and existing lead pollution reconstructions from lakes on the Keweenaw Peninsula. Interestingly, a coherent cessation of lead emissions at multiple study sites after ~5400 yr BP coincides with the onset of dry conditions found in regional paleoclimate proxy records. After ~5000 yr BP, lead concentrations on both Isle Royale and the Keweenaw Peninsula remain at background levels until the onset of modern lead pollution ~AD 1860. Keywords archaeology, lead, Michigan, Old Copper Complex, pollution, prehistoric copper mining, sediments Received 2 May 2014; revised manuscript accepted 30 August 2014 Introduction Copper use in the regions surrounding Lake Superior represents are dated to this period (Crane and Griffin, 1965; Martin, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Gender in 17Th Century Southern New England Megan K
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Master's Theses University of Connecticut Graduate School 8-24-2016 Gender in 17th Century Southern New England Megan K. Willison [email protected] Recommended Citation Willison, Megan K., "Gender in 17th Century Southern New England" (2016). Master's Theses. 968. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/968 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Connecticut Graduate School at OpenCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gender in 17th Century Southern New England Megan Willison B.Phil, University of Pittsburgh, 2013 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts At the University of Connecticut 2016 i Copyright by Megan Willison 2016 ii APPROVAL PAGE Masters of Arts Thesis Gender in 17th Century Southern New England Presented by Megan Willison, B.Phil. Major Advisor___________________________________________________________ Kevin McBride Associate Advisor________________________________________________________ Françoise Dussart Associate Advisor________________________________________________________ Walter Woodward University of Connecticut 2016 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first thank Professors Kevin McBride, Françoise Dussart, and Walter Woodward—their insight, advice, and comments were invaluable in shaping the direction and information presented in this paper. A special thanks to my primary advisor, Kevin McBride, for all of his time in reading the many drafts of this thesis and providing the opportunity to work with the compiled data sets and artifact collections presented herein. I would also like to thank the Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center for allowing me access to their collections and to all those who aided in recovering and cataloging the metallic objects used in the current analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Copper, Glacial Kame and Red Ocher Cultures ...2
    Old Copper, Glacial Kame and Red Ocher Cultures ................................ 2 Old Copper Complex .................................................................................................................. 2 The Glacial Kame Culture ................................................................................................................. 3 The Red Ocher Culture ...................................................................................................................... 3 References ................................................................................................................................... 5 Appendix 1 Red Ocher sites ........................................................................................................ 8 Old Copper, Glacial Kame and Red Ocher Cultures Old Copper Complex One of the most visible and influential of the Archaic cultures was Old Copper Complex (7,000 – 3,000 BP) of the western Great Lakes, named for their heavy use of cold-worked copper for weaponry, tools, and decorative objects. (Thomas C. Pleger 2002) Veins and nuggets of almost pure copper were deposited glaciers in gravel beds around Lake Superior and near Etowah in the Appalachian Mountains of Alabama. (Welch 1991) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Copper_Complex The Old Copper people did not have smelting technology. They cold hammered this copper to produce points, tools and decorative objects. They developed a trading network to export copper artifacts and nuggets for other exotic materials. About
    [Show full text]
  • Method and Theory in American Archaeology
    Method and Theory in American Archaeology GORDON R. WILLEY and PHILIP PHILLIPS A rchaeology and Anthropology meet in thi&stud^ of the prehi$iQTy\ of the Americas^ P88 $1.50 (U.K. 10/6 n.et» PLEASE HANDLE WITH CARE University of Connecticut Libraries •Q* «^0 f^» «^9 <^» 3 =1153 013523bl D GAYLORD RG Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/methodtheoryinam1958will S < C oO Method and Theory in American A rchaeology Method and Theory BY GORDON R. WILLEY AND PHILIP PHILLIPS in American Archaeology PHOENIX BOOKS 4£fc THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO & LONDON Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 57-11215 The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada © 1958 by The University of Chicago. Published 1958 First Phoenix Edition 1962 Third Impression 1963 Composed and printed by The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. To JAMES ALFRED FORD Preface In the summer of 1952, as a result of numerous discussions, we de- cided to set down our thoughts on certain methodological and the- oretical questions in American archaeology. The original plan was an article in two parts : the first, a statement of what we believed to be the minimal aims of archaeology and the basic operations di- rected toward the achievement of these aims, and the second, some theoretical formulations about New World prehistory. The first part was subsequently published under the title "Method and Theory in American Archaeology: An Operational Basis for Cul- ture-Historical Integration." 1 The second part followed a year and a half later as "Method and Theory in American Archaeology II: Historical-Developmental Interpretation." 2 The comments and criticism which these papers drew from colleagues and students have kept us interested in the subject, and, as a result, we have re- written both original papers and combined them, along with an introduction, originally published as a brief journal article, 3 in the present volume.
    [Show full text]