DOCSLIB.ORG

Welcome to the 2018 HUD Affordable Housing Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Welcome to the 2018 HUD Affordable Housing Guide Welcome to the 2018 HUD Affordable Housing Guide For federally subsidized housing, the amount and type of assistance may vary but the majority of properties have Project-Based Section 8 subsidy, where the tenant pays 30% of their adjusted gross monthly income for rent. The difference between the amounts paid by the resident and the rent charged by the owner is paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Although HUD provides the funding, the responsibility for operating the program rests with the site manager. After selecting a building(s) from the list, please contact the on-site manager from the phone number(s) provided. They can answer questions regarding your eligibility and the availability of units, as each site maintains its own waiting list and takes your application. The list shows the number of units in the building as well as the population they are designated to serve. Rent: Generally, a HUD affordable housing tenant pays 10 percent of gross income or 30 percent of adjusted income, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER, but not less than $25, for rent including utilities. HUD pays the difference between the tenant's share and the regular rental to the owner as housing assistance. If utilities are designated to be paid by the resident, a utility allowance is subtracted in determining the actual rent paid to the project. Utilities are then paid by the tenant directly to the utility company as billed. Waiting Lists: A Public Housing Authority (PHA) is responsible for establishing an application and selection process that treats applicants fairly and consistently and provides an effective method for determining eligibility. The design of these processes must result in consistent determinations as to which applicants should be placed on the waiting list, issued a voucher, or determined ineligible to participate in the program and comply with HUD rules on non-discrimination. Conducting outreach, as needed, and maintaining an up-to-date waiting list is an important PHA responsibility. Subscribe to the HousingLink public housing waiting list email newsletter to be notified when local PHAs open or close their waiting lists: http://www.housinglink.org/register For current vacancies in affordable and subsidized housing, you may contact any of the following: • PHA in your area of interest • (If a phone number is invalid, please notify us at 612-370-3072) • HousingLink at 612-522-2500 or at their website address: www.housinglink.org • Metro Information Line at 651-602-1880 • If you need immediate housing, please call United Way—First Call for Help at 2-1-1 For immediate emergency housing (shelter & transitional) in the metro area, contact Hennepin County Front Door at (612) 348-4111 or Ramsey County at (651) 215-2262 Updated December 11, 2017 Overview of rental housing subsidy programs (The Big 3) An overview of three common rental housing subsidy programs where the renter pays only a percentage of their income. Properties participating in these programs appear in this directory. Project-Based Section 8 Public Housing Section 8 Housing* Housing Choice Vouchers What it is • Publicly owned and managed • Privately owned and • Government-funded program rental units for low-income managed rental units for that helps low-income households low-income households households pay the rent on private, market-rate rental units. • Some units are reserved only • Some units are reserved for seniors or people with only for seniors, people • A renter finds a unit (within disabilities. with disabilities, or other certain requirements); a populations. housing authority pays a • This is a project-based portion of the rent directly to subsidy. (The subsidy stays • This is a project-based the property. with the unit) subsidy. (The subsidy stays with the unit) • This is a tenant-based subsidy (The subsidy goes with the tenant). What it costs • Most units cost 30% of the • Most units cost 30% of the • 30% to 40% of a household’s households adjusted gross households adjusted gross adjusted gross income. income. income. • Some units have a low, fixed • Some units have a low, fixed rent amount. rent amount. What it offers • Very affordable rents; • Very affordable rents; • Very affordable rents; the rent you pay is based on the rent you pay is based on the rent you pay is based on your income your income your income • Variety of housing styles • Variety of housing styles • A renter gets to choose the (single-family, apartment, (single-family, apartment, apartment he/she wants to townhome) and amenities. townhome) and amenities. rent (including possibly staying in the same unit where the • A single access point for • Many different landlords renter already lives). applying, often for a large and property managers number of units. participate. • Sometimes you can keep your subsidy if you decide to move. What to be prepared for • You will need to apply at a • You will need to apply at • You will need to apply at a public housing authority to the individual property. Each housing authority to get a get on the waiting list. owner keeps a separate voucher. waiting list. • Waiting lists for public • Waiting lists for vouchers can housing can be closed or • Waiting lists at properties be closed or long. long can be closed or long • You still have to apply at the • Sometimes there are specific • You may have to call or property lists for specific bedroom travel around a lot to find sizes or housing types. out whose waiting list is • A credit and history check at open and how to apply. the property will probably be • A credit and history check required. will probably be required. • A credit and history check at the property will probably be • Some properties may choose • Some units are older and required. not to accept vouchers. come with few amenities Other project-based programs • The unit must pass an • If you don’t like the unit(s) operate in a similar manner, inspection before the subsidy offered, you may have including: Section 202, Section payments can start. limited choices. 236, Section 515 for rural • The housing authority will help areas, and Section 811. identify an eligible rent. www.housinglink.org © 2006 HousingLink 10/06 Housing programs listed by number There are a number of housing programs that a property may participate in and are often referred to by a Section Number. This document gives some additional information about each of these programs. Keep in mind the following: • Each property will have its own application process and waiting list. • Information about properties that participate in these programs and local housing authorities in Minnesota can be found on HousingLink’s website at www.housinglink.org. Who this is for Rent How to apply Special conditions** Section 8 For low-income renters Rent is 30% of the Apply at the Some units may Project Based who want to live in household’s adjusted participating property. only be available privately owned and gross income OR it to people with managed properties may also be a low- disabilities or fixed amount elderly. Section 8 For low-income renters Rent is 30% to 40% The process begins by An inspection of the Housing Choice Voucher who want to live in of the household’s applying at your local unit is necessary private market housing adjusted gross income housing authority. before the subsidy Once you have the can start. Rent limits voucher, apply at a apply. property. Section 42 For income-qualifying Rent is set at a rate Apply at the Rents may vary by renters who want to below the average participating property. unit size. Number live in private market cost of rental housing You must meet all of available units housing in the area (market other application differs by building. rate). requirements. Section 202 For low-income seniors Rent is generally 30% Contact the age 62 and older of adjusted gross participating property. income Section 236 For low-income renters Rent is 30% of your Apply at the Rents are different adjusted gross income participating property. at every building. OR a Fair Market Rent * Section 515 For low-income renters Rent is 30% of your Apply at the Not all rural who live in a rural area adjusted gross income participating property. buildings qualify. OR a Fair Market Rent * Section 811 For low-income renters Rent is generally 30% Apply at the The person with with disabilities who are of adjusted gross- participating property the disability needs over the age of 18 income OR contact the local to be the head of housing authority for house or spouse. extra assistance. * Fair Market Rent is determined by HUD ** More information about qualifications should be obtained at the property www.housinglink.org © 2006 HousingLink 04/06 Housing Choice Vouchers Fact Sheet What are housing choice vouchers? The housing choice voucher program is the federal government's major program for assisting very low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled to afford decent, safe, and sanitary housing in the private market. Since housing assistance is provided on behalf of the family or individual, participants are able to find their own housing, including single-family homes, townhouses and apartments. The participant is free to choose any housing that meets the requirements of the program and is not limited to units located in subsidized housing projects. Housing choice vouchers are administered locally by public housing agencies(PHAs). The PHAs receive federal funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to administer the voucher program. A family that is issued a housing voucher is responsible for finding a suitable housing unit of the family's choice where the owner agrees to rent under the program.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 220 Central Park South Garage Environmental
    220 Central Park South Garage Environmental Assessment Statement ULURP #: 170249ZSM, N170250ZCM CEQR #: 16DCP034M Prepared For: NYC Department of City Planning Prepared on Behalf of: VNO 225 West 58th Street LLC Prepared by: Philip Habib & Associates June 16, 2017 220 CENTRAL PARK SOUTH GARAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS EAS Form……................................................................................................Form Attachment A......................................................................Project Description Attachment B..............................................Supplemental Screening Analyses Appendix I..................................................Residential Growth Parking Study Appendix II.................................................LPC Environmental Review Letter EAS Form EAS FULL FORM PAGE 1 City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (EAS) FULL FORM Please fill out and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) Part I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME 220 Central Park South Parking Garage EAS 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (to be assigned by lead agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) 16DCP034M ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (if applicable) 170249ZSM, N170250ZCM (e.g., legislative intro, CAPA) 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT New York City Department of City Planning VNO 225 West 58th Street LLC NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON
    [Show full text]
  • STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57T1i Street (Aka 106-116 West 58L" Street), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 13, 2001, Designation List 331 LP-2100 STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57t1i Street (aka 106-116 West 58l" Street), Manhattan. Built 1924-25; [Whitney] Warren & [Charles D.] Wetmore, architects; Thompson-Starrett Co., builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1010, Lot 25. October 16, 2001 , the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of Steinway Hall and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions oflaw. Eight people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the property's owners, Community Board 5, Municipal Art Society, American Institute of Architects' Historic Buildings Committee, and Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission received two letters in support of designation, including one from the New York Landmarks Conservancy. Summary The sixteen-story Steinway Hall was constructed in 1924-25 to the design of architects Warren & Wetmore for Steinway & Sons, a piano manufacturing firm that has been a dominant force in its industry since the 1860s. Founded in 1853 in New York by Heinrich E. Steinweg, Sr., the firm grew to worldwide renown and prestige through technical innovations, efficient production, business acumen, and shrewd promotion using artists' endorsements. From 1864 to 1925, Steinway's offices/showroom, and famous Steinway Hall (1866), were located near Union Square. After Carnegie Hall opened in 1891, West 57t1i Street gradually became one of the nation's leading cultural and classical music centers and the piano companies relocated uptown. It was not until 1923, however, that Steinway acquired a 57th Street site.
    [Show full text]
  • MF Inspection Report Query
    OFFICE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS - PHYSICAL INSPECTION SCORES MINNESOTA Inspection Scores Release Dates Grouped By City Wednesday, November 27, 2013 City Property Name REMS Inspection Release Inspection Release Inspection Release Property ID Score1 Date 1 Score2 Date 2 Score3 Date 3 ADA Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City VALLEY VIEW MANOR 800011331 89a 12/5/2012 95b 4/23/2008 77c 1/10/2007 AITKIN Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City AITKIN MANOR APARTMENTS 800010745 96a 5/25/2011 97b 10/10/2007 75c 10/25/2006 City RIPPLE RIVER TOWNHOUSES 800011213 97a 5/25/2011 97a 8/15/2007 86c* 9/9/2004 ALBANY Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City MERCY MANOR 800011073 91c 9/17/2008 68c* 8/8/2007 84b 8/1/2002 City Mercy Manor II 800221540 96b 2/24/2011 ALBERT LEA Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City TRAILSIDE APARTMENTS aka Channel 800010828 74c 11/21/2012 89c 9/3/2008 84b 8/24/2006 View City SENIOR COURT 800011250 91b 10/17/2012 85b 9/22/2010 75c 11/18/2009 City Village Cooperative of Albert Lea 800221994 95b 11/2/2011 95b 11/5/2008 Alexandria Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City BETHEL MANOR I 800010774 77c* 11/29/2012 81a 12/23/2009 77c 10/24/2007 City Bethel Manor II 800010775 96b 2/8/2012 76c 9/27/2007 98a 9/16/2004 City MAPLE RIDGE MANOR 800011081
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Shadows
    Chapter 5: Shadows A. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the detailed shadow study that was conducted to determine whether the proposed One Vanderbilt development would cast any new shadows on sunlight-sensitive resources. Sunlight-sensitive resources can include parks, playgrounds, residential or office plazas, and other publicly accessible open spaces; sunlight-dependent features of historic resources; and important natural features such as water bodies. Since the preparation of the shadow analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the height of the proposed One Vanderbilt development was increased. The shadow analysis in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been revised to reflect this change including Figures 5-1 to 5-22 and 5-27. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS This analysis compared shadows that would be cast by the proposed One Vanderbilt development, which would be built to a floor area ratio (FAR) of 30, with those that would be cast by the 15 FAR building that would be developed absent the proposed actions (the 15 FAR No-Action building). As described below, the analysis concluded that the proposed 30 FAR One Vanderbilt development would cast new shadows on Bryant Park, the west windows of Grand Central Terminal’s main concourse and several other sunlight-sensitive resources. However, the new shadows would be limited in extent, duration and effects and would not result in any significant adverse shadow impacts, as demonstrated in detail below. B. DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY This analysis has been prepared in accordance with CEQR procedures and follows the guidelines of the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual. DEFINITIONS Incremental shadow is the additional, or new, shadow that a structure resulting from a project would cast on a sunlight-sensitive resource.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version Press.Indd
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Minneapolis Field Office 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4012 As requested, enclosed are lists of HUD Affordable Rental Housing in your requested area. The amount and type of assistance may vary per building but the majority of the buildings have Project-Based Section 8 subsidy, where the tenant pays 30% of their adjusted gross monthly income for rent. The difference between the amounts paid by the resident and the rent charged by the owner is paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Although HUD provides the funding, the responsibility for operating the program rests with the site manager. After selecting a building(s) from the list, please contact the on-site manager from the phone number(s) provided. They can answer questions regarding your eligibility and the availability of units, as each site maintains its own waiting list and takes your application. The list shows the number of units in the building as well as the population they are designated to serve. Rent: Generally, a HUD affordable housing tenant pays 10 percent of gross income or 30 percent of adjusted income, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER, but not less than $25, for rent including utilities. HUD pays the difference between the tenant's share and the regular rental to the owner as housing assistance. If utilities are designated to be paid by the resident, a utility allowance is subtracted in determining the actual rent paid to the project. Utilities are then paid by the tenant directly to the utility company as billed.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIETY HOUSE of the AMERICAN SOCIETY of CIVIL ENGINEERS, 220 West 57Th Street, Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission December 16, 2008, Designation List 408 LP-2297 SOCIETY HOUSE of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, 220 West 57th Street, Manhattan. Built 1896-97, Cyrus L.W. Eidlitz, architect; annex 1905-06, [Cyrus L.W.] Eidlitz & [Andrew C.] McKenzie, architect; ground-story alteration 1918, Arnold W. Brunner, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1028, Lot 42. On March 18, 2008, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Society House of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing was continued to April 15, 2008 (Item No. 1). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Two people spoke in favor of designation: representatives of the Historic Districts Council and Metropolitan Chapter of the Victorian Society in America. A representative of the building’s owner indicated that they did not oppose designation, but wanted regulation to be limited to the front facade. In addition, the Commission received a resolution from Manhattan Community Board 5 and a letter from State Senator Liz Krueger in support of designation. Summary Built in 1896-97 to the French Renaissance Revival style design of architect Cyrus L.W. Eidlitz, the Society House of the American Society of Civil Engineers was the headquarters of the organization founded in 1852. As the engineering profession grew rapidly in the 19th century and its membership increased, ASCE needed a new building, said to be the first such project for a professional American engineering society.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota 55402-4012
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Minneapolis Field Office 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4012 As requested, enclosed are lists of HUD Affordable Rental Housing in your requested area. The amount and type of assistance may vary per building but the majority of the buildings have Project-Based Section 8 subsidy, where the tenant pays 30% of their adjusted gross monthly income for rent. The difference between the amounts paid by the resident and the rent charged by the owner is paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Although HUD provides the funding, the responsibility for operating the program rests with the site manager. After selecting a building(s) from the list, please contact the on-site manager from the phone number(s) provided. They can answer questions regarding your eligibility and the availability of units, as each site maintains its own waiting list and takes your application. The list shows the number of units in the building as well as the population they are designated to serve. Rent: Generally, a HUD affordable housing tenant pays 10 percent of gross income or 30 percent of adjusted income, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER, but not less than $25, for rent including utilities. HUD pays the difference between the tenant's share and the regular rental to the owner as housing assistance. If utilities are designated to be paid by the resident, a utility allowance is subtracted in determining the actual rent paid to the project. Utilities are then paid by the tenant directly to the utility company as billed.
    [Show full text]
  • OSBORNE APARTMENTS 205 West 57Th Street, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission August 13, 1991; Designation List 238 LP-1770 OSBORNE APARTMENTS 205 West 57th Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1883-1885, 1889; architect, James Edward Ware; 1906, architect, Alfred S.G. Taylor. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan, Tax Map Block 1029, Lot 27. On December 12, 1989, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Osborne Apartments and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 34). The hearing was continued to April 3, 1990 (Item No. 25), and then to July 10, 1990 (Item No. 5). All three hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. A total of seven witnesses at the three hearings spoke in favor of designation. Two witnesses were opposed to designation. The Commission received numerous letters both in support of and in opposition to designation. The Board of Directors of the Osborne Apartments has expressed support for the designation.1 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Summary The Osborne Apartments, built in 1883-85 and designed by the talented and prolific architect James E. Ware, was one of the earliest luxury apartment buildings in New York City. Constructed in what by 1890 had become New York's first apartment house district, near Central Park, this architecturally-impressive building is a rare surviving example of the original development in this city of multi-family dwellings for well-to-do residents, an increasingly important building type in the 1880s. The Osborne's design draws elements from the popular Romanesque Revival style, such as the heavy, rusticated stone exterior with deeply set windows, for a sense of solidity; these are combined in a bold and original manner with the refinement, proportions, and strong horizontality of the emerging Renaissance Revival style.
    [Show full text]
  • 130 West 57Th Street Studio Building, 130 West 57Th Street, (Aka 126-132 West 57Th Street), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission October 19, 1999, Designation List 310 LP-2042 130 West 57th Street Studio Building, 130 West 57th Street, (aka 126-132 West 57th Street), Manhattan. Built, 1907-08, Pollard & Steinam, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1009, Lot 46. On July 13, 1999, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the 130 West 57th Street Studio Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. There were six speakers in support of designation, including the owner of the building, representatives of the Landmarks Conservancy, the Society for the Architecture of the City, and the Historic Districts Council. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. In addition, the Commission has received letters from Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried and from Community Board 5 in support of designation. Summary Built in 1907-08 to provide living and working facilities for artists, the studio building at 130 West 57th Street is a rare surviving example of this unusual building type, and a reminder of the early twentieth century period when West 57th Street was a center of artistic activities. Designed by architects Pollard & Steinam, who had previously created several artists’ studio cooperatives on West 67th Street, this building profited from the experience of the developers and builders who had worked on the earlier structures. The artists’ studio building type was developed early in the twentieth century, and was an important step toward the acceptance of apartment living for wealthy New Yorkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Langdon Neighborhood Character Study (2018)
    LANGDON NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER STUDY MADISON, WISCONSIN 2018 Survey Report City Project #8665-0-2017-JA 30 November 2018 web color print color LANGDON NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER STUDY PREPARED FOR: City of Madison Planning Division 125 S. Hamilton St. Madison, WI 53701 Project # 8665-0-2017-JA PREPARED BY: Preserve, LLC 5027 N. Berkeley Blvd. Whitefish Bay, WI 53217 (+1) 262 617 1408 DONNA WEISS, Founder KATE BISSEN, Preservation Associate web color IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: Danielle Euer, Principal Euer Preservation Consulting LLC 5415 N. Sheridan Rd., #504 Chicago, IL 60640 print color ii Langdon Neighborhood Character Study, 2018 Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS METHODOLOGY Introduction p. 1 Approach p. 1 Survey Boundaries p. 1 Research Methods p. 1 DISTRICT MAPS Diagram of Overlapping Districts p. 3 Langdon Neighborhood Character Study Current Designations p. 5 Recommendations p. 7 LANGDON NEIGHBORHOOD HISTORICAL CONTEXT Boundaries and Borders p. 9 Neighborhood History p. 9 LANGDON NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION ISSUES Historic District/Landmark Designations p. 13 Issue of Overlapping Districts p. 14 Preservation Activity to Date p. 14 Development Pressures p. 15 LANGDON NEIGHBORHOOD SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Summary p. 17 Physical Characteristics p. 17 Character Defining Features p. 18 Streetscape, Landscape, and Patterns p. 18 Setbacks, Right-of-Way, and Spatial Character p. 19 Variations Among Building Types p. 21 Relationships with Neighboring Structures p. 22 Langdon Neighborhood Architectural Styles p. 23 Prevalent Materials p. 29 RECOMMENDATIONS TO PRESERVE CHARACTER General Recommendations p. 31 Evaluate Zoning Tools p. 31 Streamlining p. 32 Communication p. 33 Incentives p. 33 Next Steps p. 33 APPENDIX A. List of Inventoried Properties p.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix EE.09 – Cultural Resources
    Appendix EE.09 – Cultural Resources Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 1 NEC FUTURE Appendix EE.09 - Cultural Resources: Data Geography Affected Environment Environmental Consequences Context Area NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE State County Existing NEC including Existing NEC including Existing NEC including Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Hartford/Springfield Line Hartford/Springfield Line Hartford/Springfield Line DC District of Columbia 10 21 0 10 21 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 49 249 0 54 248 0 MD Prince George's County 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 23 0 1 23 0 MD Anne Arundel County 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 MD Howard County 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 MD Baltimore County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 MD Baltimore City 3 44 0 3 46 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 25 212 0 26 213 0 MD Harford County 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 12 0 1 15 0 MD Cecil County 0 6 2 0 8 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 11 2 0 11 2 DE New Castle County 3 64 2 3 67 2 0 2 1 0 5 2 3 187 1 4 186 2 PA Delaware County 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 1 18 0 PA Philadelphia County 9 85 1 10 87 1 0 2 1 3 4 1 57 368 1 57 370 1 PA Bucks County 3 8 1 3 8 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 15 1 3 15 1 NJ Burlington County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 1 17 0 NJ Mercer County 1 9 1 1 10 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 40 1 6 40 1 NJ Middlesex County 1 20 2 1 20 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 42 2 1 42 2 NJ Somerset County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 NJ Union County 1 9 1 1 10 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 17 1 2 17 1 NJ Essex County 1 24 1 1 26 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 65 1 1 65 1 NJ Hudson County
    [Show full text]
  • J. & W. Seligman & Company Building Designation Report
    Landmarks Preservation Commission February 13, 1996, Designation List 271 LP-1943 J. & W. SELIGMAN & COMPANY BUILDING (later LEHMAN BROTHERS BUILDING; now Banca Commerciale Italiana Building), 1 William Street (aka 1-9 William Street, 1-7 South William Street, and 63-67 Stone Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1906-07; Francis H. Kimball and Julian C. Levi, architects; George A. Fuller Co., builders; South William Street facade alteration 1929, Harry R. Allen, architect; addition 1982-86, Gino Valle, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 29, Lot 36. On December 12, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the J. & W. Seligman & Company Building (later Lehman Brothers Building; now Banca Commerciale Italiana Building) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing was continued to January 30, 1996 (Item No. 4). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Nine witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of Manhattan Borough President Ruth Messinger, Council Member Kathryn Freed, Municipal Art Society, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, and New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects. In addition, the Commission has received a resolution from Community Board 1 in support of designation. Summary The rusticated, richly sculptural, neo-Renaissance style J. & W. Seligman & Company Building, designed by Francis Hatch Kimball in association with Julian C. Levi and built in 1906-07 by the George A. Fuller Co., is located at the intersection of William and South William Streets, two blocks off Wall Street.
    [Show full text]