Minnesota 55402-4012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minnesota 55402-4012 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Minneapolis Field Office 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4012 As requested, enclosed are lists of HUD Affordable Rental Housing in your requested area. The amount and type of assistance may vary per building but the majority of the buildings have Project-Based Section 8 subsidy, where the tenant pays 30% of their adjusted gross monthly income for rent. The difference between the amounts paid by the resident and the rent charged by the owner is paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Although HUD provides the funding, the responsibility for operating the program rests with the site manager. After selecting a building(s) from the list, please contact the on-site manager from the phone number(s) provided. They can answer questions regarding your eligibility and the availability of units, as each site maintains its own waiting list and takes your application. The list shows the number of units in the building as well as the population they are designated to serve. Rent: Generally, a HUD affordable housing tenant pays 10 percent of gross income or 30 percent of adjusted income, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER, but not less than $25, for rent including utilities. HUD pays the difference between the tenant's share and the regular rental to the owner as housing assistance. If utilities are designated to be paid by the resident, a utility allowance is subtracted in determining the actual rent paid to the project. Utilities are then paid by the tenant directly to the utility company as billed. Waiting Lists: A Public Housing Authority (PHA) is responsible for establishing an application and selection process that treats applicants fairly and consistently and provides an effective method for determining eligibility. The design of these processes must result in consistent determinations as to which applicants should be placed on the waiting list, issued a voucher, or determined ineligible to participate in the program and comply with HUD rules on non-discrimination. Conducting outreach, as needed, and maintaining an up-to-date waiting list is an important PHA responsibility. Subscribe to the HousingLink public housing waiting list email newsletter to be notified when local PHAs open or close their waiting lists: http://www.housinglink.org/register For current vacancies in affordable and subsidized housing, you may contact any of the following: The On-Site phone number listed on the attached sheets for the building(s) in which you are interested HRA in your area of interest. (If a phone number is invalid, please notify us at 612-370-3051) HousingLink at 612-522-2500 or at their website address: www.housinglink.org Metro Information Line at 651-602-1880 Minnesota Housing at 651-296-7608. If you need immediate housing, please call United Way—First Call for Help at 2-1-1. For immediate emergency housing (shelter & transitional) in the metro area, please contact Hennepin County Front Door at (612) 348-4111 or Ramsey County at (651) 215- 2262. Thank you for your inquiry. Overview of rental housing subsidy programs (The Big 3) An overview of three common rental housing subsidy programs where the renter pays only a percentage of their income. Properties participating in these programs appear in this directory. Project-Based Section 8 Public Housing Section 8 Housing* Housing Choice Vouchers What it is • Publicly owned and managed • Privately owned and • Government-funded program rental units for low-income managed rental units for that helps low-income households low-income households households pay the rent on private, market-rate rental units. • Some units are reserved only • Some units are reserved for seniors or people with only for seniors, people • A renter finds a unit (within disabilities. with disabilities, or other certain requirements); a populations. housing authority pays a • This is a project-based portion of the rent directly to subsidy. (The subsidy stays • This is a project-based the property. with the unit) subsidy. (The subsidy stays with the unit) • This is a tenant-based subsidy (The subsidy goes with the tenant). What it costs • Most units cost 30% of the • Most units cost 30% of the • 30% to 40% of a household’s households adjusted gross households adjusted gross adjusted gross income. income. income. • Some units have a low, fixed • Some units have a low, fixed rent amount. rent amount. What it offers • Very affordable rents; • Very affordable rents; • Very affordable rents; the rent you pay is based on the rent you pay is based on the rent you pay is based on your income your income your income • Variety of housing styles • Variety of housing styles • A renter gets to choose the (single-family, apartment, (single-family, apartment, apartment he/she wants to townhome) and amenities. townhome) and amenities. rent (including possibly staying in the same unit where the • A single access point for • Many different landlords renter already lives). applying, often for a large and property managers number of units. participate. • Sometimes you can keep your subsidy if you decide to move. What to be prepared for • You will need to apply at a • You will need to apply at • You will need to apply at a public housing authority to the individual property. Each housing authority to get a get on the waiting list. owner keeps a separate voucher. waiting list. • Waiting lists for public • Waiting lists for vouchers can housing can be closed or • Waiting lists at properties be closed or long. long can be closed or long • You still have to apply at the • Sometimes there are specific • You may have to call or property lists for specific bedroom travel around a lot to find sizes or housing types. out whose waiting list is • A credit and history check at open and how to apply. the property will probably be • A credit and history check required. will probably be required. • A credit and history check at the property will probably be • Some properties may choose • Some units are older and required. not to accept vouchers. come with few amenities Other project-based programs • The unit must pass an • If you don’t like the unit(s) operate in a similar manner, inspection before the subsidy offered, you may have including: Section 202, Section payments can start. limited choices. 236, Section 515 for rural • The housing authority will help areas, and Section 811. identify an eligible rent. www.housinglink.org © 2006 HousingLink 10/06 Housing programs listed by number There are a number of housing programs that a property may participate in and are often referred to by a Section Number. This document gives some additional information about each of these programs. Keep in mind the following: • Each property will have its own application process and waiting list. • Information about properties that participate in these programs and local housing authorities in Minnesota can be found on HousingLink’s website at www.housinglink.org. Who this is for Rent How to apply Special conditions** Section 8 For low-income renters Rent is 30% of the Apply at the Some units may Project Based who want to live in household’s adjusted participating property. only be available privately owned and gross income OR it to people with managed properties may also be a low- disabilities or fixed amount elderly. Section 8 For low-income renters Rent is 30% to 40% The process begins by An inspection of the Housing Choice Voucher who want to live in of the household’s applying at your local unit is necessary private market housing adjusted gross income housing authority. before the subsidy Once you have the can start. Rent limits voucher, apply at a apply. property. Section 42 For income-qualifying Rent is set at a rate Apply at the Rents may vary by renters who want to below the average participating property. unit size. Number live in private market cost of rental housing You must meet all of available units housing in the area (market other application differs by building. rate). requirements. Section 202 For low-income seniors Rent is generally 30% Contact the age 62 and older of adjusted gross participating property. income Section 236 For low-income renters Rent is 30% of your Apply at the Rents are different adjusted gross income participating property. at every building. OR a Fair Market Rent * Section 515 For low-income renters Rent is 30% of your Apply at the Not all rural who live in a rural area adjusted gross income participating property. buildings qualify. OR a Fair Market Rent * Section 811 For low-income renters Rent is generally 30% Apply at the The person with with disabilities who are of adjusted gross- participating property the disability needs over the age of 18 income OR contact the local to be the head of housing authority for house or spouse. extra assistance. * Fair Market Rent is determined by HUD ** More information about qualifications should be obtained at the property www.housinglink.org © 2006 HousingLink 04/06 Housing Choice Vouchers Fact Sheet What are housing choice vouchers? The housing choice voucher program is the federal government's major program for assisting very low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled to afford decent, safe, and sanitary housing in the private market. Since housing assistance is provided on behalf of the family or individual, participants are able to find their own housing, including single-family homes, townhouses and apartments. The participant is free to choose any housing that meets the requirements of the program and is not limited to units located in subsidized housing projects. Housing choice vouchers are administered locally by public housing agencies(PHAs).
Recommended publications
  • Crossing Busy Streets
    Plymouth Square Park Northport e 3rd Ter NW 55th Ave McKenna 47th 1/2 v Wyn Ascot Ct 55th Ave A d Tioga Ct lvd I-35W 5 e Elem Ath Ave 55th Ave B C D ham E Tioga B F 5 v d th A 55 Park Ave NE Sailor La Old Osseo Rd C n Hilltop T W Canyon La E River Rd a e i 4th St x r w r e f E N v Park 3rd St NW o in Anoka 47th Ave NE 47th Ave NE 47th Ave NE G 47th Ave NE r o A Bellvue L d Bicentennial Ct r Lions Ave11th NW t n a 54th Ave County h H k p a Park North e e o Park g 46th 1/2 Ave NE W Charles HWY 100 r H i 2nd St NW Chatham Rd NE g B Riverfront r Knox Ave 2 W N 5th Ave NW o n N Girard Ave Thom Ct t e h 12th Ave NW Irving Ave d St Logan Ave l Brooklyn Blvd a James Ave Colfax Ave Bryant Ave v 53rd Pl L Penn Ave City Hall i D Fremont Ave t Oliver Ave Emerson Ave Perry d Twin M g Dupont Ave Queen Ave s e Lilac Dr Camden Ave Regional g 8 r h D R a Russell Ave Humboldt Ave 46th Ave NE 46th Ave NE 46th Ave NE t r t y Johnson St NE How many does it take to get from your e s i Park r w Newton Ave e Lake Park s D H 53rd Ave e Ivanhoe Pl NE H 53rd Ave N r Silver Lake Rd 14th Ave NW r r 15th Ave NW 16th Ave NW Polk St NE N 17th Ave NW d Main St NE e 1st St NW T 53rd Ave N v A l Tyler St NE s T home to your school? r E h o h Taylor St NE Keyes le y O D S Fillmore St NE h Mississippi River i o m in University Ave NE r g l Park B N 4th St l County Rd E e Minneapolis45th Ave 45th Ave NE Walkingvd RoutesCounty Rd E for Youth BROOKLYN 45th Ave NE 2nd St NE N 1 W 8th Ave NW Lakeside C E 32nd Ave NW 52nd Ave W r 4 e 8 52nd Ave N t 52nd Ave N L Tony Schmidt i Upton Ave N e h Park y n OK, nowt calculate how many miles your school is h n k George Hill & 2nd 1/2 St NE 44th 1/2 Ave NE d A Neighborhood Walking Route Stinson Blvd NE Shingle T d CENTER s A County Park Trac Signal o v r Bright Water a e v a MPS High Schools r 17th Ave SW l from your home.
    [Show full text]
  • 220 Central Park South Garage Environmental
    220 Central Park South Garage Environmental Assessment Statement ULURP #: 170249ZSM, N170250ZCM CEQR #: 16DCP034M Prepared For: NYC Department of City Planning Prepared on Behalf of: VNO 225 West 58th Street LLC Prepared by: Philip Habib & Associates June 16, 2017 220 CENTRAL PARK SOUTH GARAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS EAS Form……................................................................................................Form Attachment A......................................................................Project Description Attachment B..............................................Supplemental Screening Analyses Appendix I..................................................Residential Growth Parking Study Appendix II.................................................LPC Environmental Review Letter EAS Form EAS FULL FORM PAGE 1 City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (EAS) FULL FORM Please fill out and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) Part I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME 220 Central Park South Parking Garage EAS 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (to be assigned by lead agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) 16DCP034M ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (if applicable) 170249ZSM, N170250ZCM (e.g., legislative intro, CAPA) 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT New York City Department of City Planning VNO 225 West 58th Street LLC NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON
    [Show full text]
  • January MSCA Backup12.40
    2006 Corporate Sponsors American Engineering Testing, Inc. The Avalon Group Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. news Bremer Bank, N.A. CB Richard Ellis Volume 20, Number 1 January 2006 CSM Corporation Cambridge Commercial Realty Colliers Feature The Collyard Group, L.L.C. What Every Real Estate Professional Should Dalbec Roofing Know About New Market Tax Credits Fantastic Sams General Growth Properties, Inc. by Tony Pasko, Bremer Bank, N.A. Great Clips, Inc. hat if you could borrow 100% of the New Market Tax Credits (NMTC) came into Griffin Companies cost of developing or substantially being in December of 2000 as part of the renovating your new shopping Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000. H.J. Development, Inc. W center project, only pay debt service on 70% These tax credits are intended to stimulate J.E. Dunn – North Central and have the government pay a return on the investment in “low income communities” as Jones Lang LaSalle remaining 30%? While it may take some time defined by census data. While NMTC’s are and effort, New Market Tax Credits can help directed at businesses, many commercial KKE Architects, Inc. you do just that. Landform Tax Credits continued on page 2 Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. M & I Bank Madison Marquette Snapshot Messerli & Kramer, P.A. Shops at Plymouth Creek – Lot 5 Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. Location: Southwest Corner of Project Morcon Construction Entrance at Hwy 55 and Vicksburg, Plymouth Northstar Partners/Cushman & Wakefield Month/Year to Open: Under Construction. Oppidan, Inc. Anticipated Tenant Delivery: April ‘06 Opus Northwest LLC Lot 5 Ownership: Plymouth Creek PCL Construction Ventures, LLC Park Midwest Commercial Real Estate Underlying Owner: CSM Corporation Paster Enterprises, LLC Lot 5 Developer & Managing Partner: RLK Incorporated Mosborg Ventures, LLC RSM McGladrey, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57T1i Street (Aka 106-116 West 58L" Street), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 13, 2001, Designation List 331 LP-2100 STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57t1i Street (aka 106-116 West 58l" Street), Manhattan. Built 1924-25; [Whitney] Warren & [Charles D.] Wetmore, architects; Thompson-Starrett Co., builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1010, Lot 25. October 16, 2001 , the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of Steinway Hall and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions oflaw. Eight people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the property's owners, Community Board 5, Municipal Art Society, American Institute of Architects' Historic Buildings Committee, and Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission received two letters in support of designation, including one from the New York Landmarks Conservancy. Summary The sixteen-story Steinway Hall was constructed in 1924-25 to the design of architects Warren & Wetmore for Steinway & Sons, a piano manufacturing firm that has been a dominant force in its industry since the 1860s. Founded in 1853 in New York by Heinrich E. Steinweg, Sr., the firm grew to worldwide renown and prestige through technical innovations, efficient production, business acumen, and shrewd promotion using artists' endorsements. From 1864 to 1925, Steinway's offices/showroom, and famous Steinway Hall (1866), were located near Union Square. After Carnegie Hall opened in 1891, West 57t1i Street gradually became one of the nation's leading cultural and classical music centers and the piano companies relocated uptown. It was not until 1923, however, that Steinway acquired a 57th Street site.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Shack Closing Locations
    Radio Shack Closing Locations Address Address2 City State Zip Gadsden Mall Shop Ctr 1001 Rainbow Dr Ste 42b Gadsden AL 35901 John T Reid Pkwy Ste C 24765 John T Reid Pkwy #C Scottsboro AL 35768 1906 Glenn Blvd Sw #200 - Ft Payne AL 35968 3288 Bel Air Mall - Mobile AL 36606 2498 Government Blvd - Mobile AL 36606 Ambassador Plaza 312 Schillinger Rd Ste G Mobile AL 36608 3913 Airport Blvd - Mobile AL 36608 1097 Industrial Pkwy #A - Saraland AL 36571 2254 Bessemer Rd Ste 104 - Birmingham AL 35208 Festival Center 7001 Crestwood Blvd #116 Birmingham AL 35210 700 Quintard Mall Ste 20 - Oxford AL 36203 Legacy Marketplace Ste C 2785 Carl T Jones Dr Se Huntsville AL 35802 Jasper Mall 300 Hwy 78 E Ste 264 Jasper AL 35501 Centerpoint S C 2338 Center Point Rd Center Point AL 35215 Town Square S C 1652 Town Sq Shpg Ctr Sw Cullman AL 35055 Riverchase Galleria #292 2000 Riverchase Galleria Hoover AL 35244 Huntsville Commons 2250 Sparkman Dr Huntsville AL 35810 Leeds Village 8525 Whitfield Ave #121 Leeds AL 35094 760 Academy Dr Ste 104 - Bessemer AL 35022 2798 John Hawkins Pky 104 - Hoover AL 35244 University Mall 1701 Mcfarland Blvd #162 Tuscaloosa AL 35404 4618 Hwy 280 Ste 110 - Birmingham AL 35243 Calera Crossing 297 Supercenter Dr Calera AL 35040 Wildwood North Shop Ctr 220 State Farm Pkwy # B2 Birmingham AL 35209 Center Troy Shopping Ctr 1412 Hwy 231 South Troy AL 36081 965 Ann St - Montgomery AL 36107 3897 Eastern Blvd - Montgomery AL 36116 Premier Place 1931 Cobbs Ford Rd Prattville AL 36066 2516 Berryhill Rd - Montgomery AL 36117 2017 280 Bypass
    [Show full text]
  • MF Inspection Report Query
    OFFICE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS - PHYSICAL INSPECTION SCORES MINNESOTA Inspection Scores Release Dates Grouped By City Wednesday, November 27, 2013 City Property Name REMS Inspection Release Inspection Release Inspection Release Property ID Score1 Date 1 Score2 Date 2 Score3 Date 3 ADA Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City VALLEY VIEW MANOR 800011331 89a 12/5/2012 95b 4/23/2008 77c 1/10/2007 AITKIN Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City AITKIN MANOR APARTMENTS 800010745 96a 5/25/2011 97b 10/10/2007 75c 10/25/2006 City RIPPLE RIVER TOWNHOUSES 800011213 97a 5/25/2011 97a 8/15/2007 86c* 9/9/2004 ALBANY Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City MERCY MANOR 800011073 91c 9/17/2008 68c* 8/8/2007 84b 8/1/2002 City Mercy Manor II 800221540 96b 2/24/2011 ALBERT LEA Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City TRAILSIDE APARTMENTS aka Channel 800010828 74c 11/21/2012 89c 9/3/2008 84b 8/24/2006 View City SENIOR COURT 800011250 91b 10/17/2012 85b 9/22/2010 75c 11/18/2009 City Village Cooperative of Albert Lea 800221994 95b 11/2/2011 95b 11/5/2008 Alexandria Property Name REMS Prop Inspection Release Da Inspection Release Dat Inspection Release Da City BETHEL MANOR I 800010774 77c* 11/29/2012 81a 12/23/2009 77c 10/24/2007 City Bethel Manor II 800010775 96b 2/8/2012 76c 9/27/2007 98a 9/16/2004 City MAPLE RIDGE MANOR 800011081
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Shadows
    Chapter 5: Shadows A. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the detailed shadow study that was conducted to determine whether the proposed One Vanderbilt development would cast any new shadows on sunlight-sensitive resources. Sunlight-sensitive resources can include parks, playgrounds, residential or office plazas, and other publicly accessible open spaces; sunlight-dependent features of historic resources; and important natural features such as water bodies. Since the preparation of the shadow analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the height of the proposed One Vanderbilt development was increased. The shadow analysis in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been revised to reflect this change including Figures 5-1 to 5-22 and 5-27. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS This analysis compared shadows that would be cast by the proposed One Vanderbilt development, which would be built to a floor area ratio (FAR) of 30, with those that would be cast by the 15 FAR building that would be developed absent the proposed actions (the 15 FAR No-Action building). As described below, the analysis concluded that the proposed 30 FAR One Vanderbilt development would cast new shadows on Bryant Park, the west windows of Grand Central Terminal’s main concourse and several other sunlight-sensitive resources. However, the new shadows would be limited in extent, duration and effects and would not result in any significant adverse shadow impacts, as demonstrated in detail below. B. DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGY This analysis has been prepared in accordance with CEQR procedures and follows the guidelines of the 2014 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual. DEFINITIONS Incremental shadow is the additional, or new, shadow that a structure resulting from a project would cast on a sunlight-sensitive resource.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version Press.Indd
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Minneapolis Field Office 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-4012 As requested, enclosed are lists of HUD Affordable Rental Housing in your requested area. The amount and type of assistance may vary per building but the majority of the buildings have Project-Based Section 8 subsidy, where the tenant pays 30% of their adjusted gross monthly income for rent. The difference between the amounts paid by the resident and the rent charged by the owner is paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Although HUD provides the funding, the responsibility for operating the program rests with the site manager. After selecting a building(s) from the list, please contact the on-site manager from the phone number(s) provided. They can answer questions regarding your eligibility and the availability of units, as each site maintains its own waiting list and takes your application. The list shows the number of units in the building as well as the population they are designated to serve. Rent: Generally, a HUD affordable housing tenant pays 10 percent of gross income or 30 percent of adjusted income, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER, but not less than $25, for rent including utilities. HUD pays the difference between the tenant's share and the regular rental to the owner as housing assistance. If utilities are designated to be paid by the resident, a utility allowance is subtracted in determining the actual rent paid to the project. Utilities are then paid by the tenant directly to the utility company as billed.
    [Show full text]
  • Locations of 2018 Submitted Applications for Regional Solicitation Transit and Travel Demand Management Projects
    Locations of 2018 Submitted Applications for Regional Solicitation Transit and Travel Demand Management Projects Reference Items )" Transit Expansion (1-10) DRAFT " Transit Modernization (11-20) " Travel Demand Management (21-33) Principle Arterial County Boundaries City Boundaries Lakes and Rivers Projects with an asterisk 6 are not displayed on map. 13 4 0 2.5 5 10 Miles 28 ") 11 ")25 3 12 17 5 10 ")9 ") § 19 20 ") ") 1 ")14 18") ")16 2 ") 15 Transit Expansion 1. Hwy 169 Interim Bus Service (10843) 2. Orange Line Connector Bus Service (10870) 3. Route 4 Transit Service Expansion in Minneapolis (10923) 18. Burnsville Transit Station Modernization (10990) 4. Route 32 Transit Service Expansion in Robbinsdale, 19. Eagan Transit Station Modernization (10991) Minneapolis, St. Anthony, and Roseville (10928) 20. Solar Array at East Creek Station in Chaska (10999) 5. Route 68 Transit Service Expansion in Saint Paul, West St. Paul, and South St. Paul (10930) Travel Demand Management 6. Route 724 Transit Service Expansion in Brooklyn Center 21.* Closed Network Carshare in Minneapolis and and Brooklyn Park (10932) Saint Paul (10804) 7.* I-494 SW Prime Service Expansion (10994) 22.* Bicycle Access & Safety Education Initiative in Minneapolis 8.* Minneapolis and Saint Paul Electric Vehicle and Saint Paul (10834) Network (11000) 23.* Scott County Travel Demand Management (10860) 9. SouthWest Transit Mobility Hub at SouthWest 24.* Transforming Renters' Transportation Choices Along Station (11024) Green Line (10913) 10. Golden Triangle Area Bus Transfer Station (11032) 25. East Metro First-Last Mile Job Access Project (10942) Transit Modernization 26.* HOURCAR Community Engagement and Outreach 11. Route 6 Corridor Bus and Stop Modernization in Initiative (10961) Minneapolis (10647) 27.* TDM Cultural Ambassadors in Minneapolis and Brooklyn 12.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIETY HOUSE of the AMERICAN SOCIETY of CIVIL ENGINEERS, 220 West 57Th Street, Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission December 16, 2008, Designation List 408 LP-2297 SOCIETY HOUSE of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, 220 West 57th Street, Manhattan. Built 1896-97, Cyrus L.W. Eidlitz, architect; annex 1905-06, [Cyrus L.W.] Eidlitz & [Andrew C.] McKenzie, architect; ground-story alteration 1918, Arnold W. Brunner, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1028, Lot 42. On March 18, 2008, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Society House of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing was continued to April 15, 2008 (Item No. 1). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Two people spoke in favor of designation: representatives of the Historic Districts Council and Metropolitan Chapter of the Victorian Society in America. A representative of the building’s owner indicated that they did not oppose designation, but wanted regulation to be limited to the front facade. In addition, the Commission received a resolution from Manhattan Community Board 5 and a letter from State Senator Liz Krueger in support of designation. Summary Built in 1896-97 to the French Renaissance Revival style design of architect Cyrus L.W. Eidlitz, the Society House of the American Society of Civil Engineers was the headquarters of the organization founded in 1852. As the engineering profession grew rapidly in the 19th century and its membership increased, ASCE needed a new building, said to be the first such project for a professional American engineering society.
    [Show full text]
  • OSBORNE APARTMENTS 205 West 57Th Street, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission August 13, 1991; Designation List 238 LP-1770 OSBORNE APARTMENTS 205 West 57th Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1883-1885, 1889; architect, James Edward Ware; 1906, architect, Alfred S.G. Taylor. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan, Tax Map Block 1029, Lot 27. On December 12, 1989, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Osborne Apartments and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 34). The hearing was continued to April 3, 1990 (Item No. 25), and then to July 10, 1990 (Item No. 5). All three hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. A total of seven witnesses at the three hearings spoke in favor of designation. Two witnesses were opposed to designation. The Commission received numerous letters both in support of and in opposition to designation. The Board of Directors of the Osborne Apartments has expressed support for the designation.1 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Summary The Osborne Apartments, built in 1883-85 and designed by the talented and prolific architect James E. Ware, was one of the earliest luxury apartment buildings in New York City. Constructed in what by 1890 had become New York's first apartment house district, near Central Park, this architecturally-impressive building is a rare surviving example of the original development in this city of multi-family dwellings for well-to-do residents, an increasingly important building type in the 1880s. The Osborne's design draws elements from the popular Romanesque Revival style, such as the heavy, rusticated stone exterior with deeply set windows, for a sense of solidity; these are combined in a bold and original manner with the refinement, proportions, and strong horizontality of the emerging Renaissance Revival style.
    [Show full text]
  • 130 West 57Th Street Studio Building, 130 West 57Th Street, (Aka 126-132 West 57Th Street), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission October 19, 1999, Designation List 310 LP-2042 130 West 57th Street Studio Building, 130 West 57th Street, (aka 126-132 West 57th Street), Manhattan. Built, 1907-08, Pollard & Steinam, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1009, Lot 46. On July 13, 1999, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the 130 West 57th Street Studio Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. There were six speakers in support of designation, including the owner of the building, representatives of the Landmarks Conservancy, the Society for the Architecture of the City, and the Historic Districts Council. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. In addition, the Commission has received letters from Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried and from Community Board 5 in support of designation. Summary Built in 1907-08 to provide living and working facilities for artists, the studio building at 130 West 57th Street is a rare surviving example of this unusual building type, and a reminder of the early twentieth century period when West 57th Street was a center of artistic activities. Designed by architects Pollard & Steinam, who had previously created several artists’ studio cooperatives on West 67th Street, this building profited from the experience of the developers and builders who had worked on the earlier structures. The artists’ studio building type was developed early in the twentieth century, and was an important step toward the acceptance of apartment living for wealthy New Yorkers.
    [Show full text]