Anti-Yo Antibody–Mediated Paraneoplastic Cerebellar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Genetic Markers in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: a Review
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Genetic Markers in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Review Katarzyna Wadowska 1 , Iwona Bil-Lula 1 , Łukasz Trembecki 2,3 and Mariola Sliwi´ ´nska-Mosso´n 1,* 1 Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, Division of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Haematology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (I.B.-L.) 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-71-784-06-30 Received: 1 June 2020; Accepted: 25 June 2020; Published: 27 June 2020 Abstract: Lung cancer is the most often diagnosed cancer in the world and the most frequent cause of cancer death. The prognosis for lung cancer is relatively poor and 75% of patients are diagnosed at its advanced stage. The currently used diagnostic tools are not sensitive enough and do not enable diagnosis at the early stage of the disease. Therefore, searching for new methods of early and accurate diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial for its effective treatment. Lung cancer is the result of multistage carcinogenesis with gradually increasing genetic and epigenetic changes. Screening for the characteristic genetic markers could enable the diagnosis of lung cancer at its early stage. The aim of this review was the summarization of both the preclinical and clinical approaches in the genetic diagnostics of lung cancer. The advancement of molecular strategies and analytic platforms makes it possible to analyze the genome changes leading to cancer development—i.e., the potential biomarkers of lung cancer. -
DCIS): Pathological Features, Differential Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors and Specimen Evaluation
Modern Pathology (2010) 23, S8–S13 S8 & 2010 USCAP, Inc. All rights reserved 0893-3952/10 $32.00 Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): pathological features, differential diagnosis, prognostic factors and specimen evaluation Sarah E Pinder Breast Research Pathology, Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous, unicentric precursor of invasive breast cancer, which is frequently identified through mammographic breast screening programs. The lesion can cause particular difficulties for specimen handling in the laboratory and typically requires even more diligent macroscopic assessment and sampling than invasive disease. Pitfalls and tips for macroscopic handling, microscopic diagnosis and assessment, including determination of prognostic factors, such as cytonuclear grade, presence or absence of necrosis, size of the lesion and distance to margins are described. All should be routinely included in histopathology reports of this disease; in order not to omit these clinically relevant details, synoptic reports, such as that produced by the College of American Pathologists are recommended. No biomarkers have been convincingly shown, and validated, to predict the behavior of DCIS till date. Modern Pathology (2010) 23, S8–S13; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.40 Keywords: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); breast cancer; histopathology; prognostic factors Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a malignant, lesions, a good cosmetic result can be obtained by clonal proliferation of cells growing within the wide local excision. Recurrence of DCIS generally basement membrane-bound structures of the breast occurs at the site of previous excision and it is and with no evidence of invasion into surrounding therefore better regarded as residual disease, as stroma. -
Probable Olivopontocerebellar Degeneration)
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.34.1.14 on 1 February 1971. Downloaded from J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1971, 34, 14-19 L-Dopa in Parkinsonism associated with cerebellar dysfunction (probable olivopontocerebellar degeneration) HAROLD L. KLAWANS, JR. AND EARL ZEITLIN From the Department of Neurology, Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA SUMMARY Two patients with combined cerebellar and Parkinsonian features consistent with olivopontocerebellar degeneration were treated with long term oral L-dopa. Both patients showed improvement of the Parkinsonian symptoms but the cerebellar symptoms were unchanged. It is suggested that the Parkinsonian manifestations of this syndrome are related to loss of dopamine in the striatum secondary to lesions of the substantia nigra. It is suggested that other patients with be a trial with similar disorders should given L-dopa. guest. Protected by copyright. Olivopontocerebellar degeneration was first defined familial form of degeneration with onset between by Dejerine and Thomas (1900). They described the ages of 20 to 30, while they had described a two patients who developed progressive cerebellar sporadic form with onset at a later age. Since the dysfunction. In both instances the onset was in original description of this disease, other investi- middle age, beginning in the legs and later involving gators have described hereditary forms of olivo- the arms. The post-mortem examination of the pontocerebellar degeneration. Keiller (1926) brains or these patients revealed atrophy of the described four cases of olivopontocerebellar de- cerebellar cortex, bulbar olives, and pontine gray generation who had positive hereditary histories. matter with degeneration of the middle and inferior Three of these cases were verified on post-mortem cerebellar peduncles. -
Electrolyte Disorders in Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review
Berardi et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:79 Journal of Cancer DOI: 10.20517/2394-4722.2019.008 Metastasis and Treatment Review Open Access Electrolyte disorders in cancer patients: a systematic review Rossana Berardi, Mariangela Torniai, Edoardo Lenci, Federica Pecci, Francesca Morgese, Silvia Rinaldi Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I - GM Lancisi - G Salesi, Ancona 60126, Italy. Correspondence to: Prof. Rossana Berardi, Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Berardi R, Torniai M, Lenci E, Pecci F, Morgese F, Rinaldi S. Electrolyte disorders in cancer patients: a systematic review. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:79. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.008 Received: 26 Apr 2019 First Decision: 26 Jul 2019 Revised: 20 Nov 2019 Accepted: 20 Nov 2019 Published: 9 Dec 2019 Science Editor: Stephen J. Ralph Copy Editor: Jing-Wen Zhang Production Editor: Jing Yu Abstract Electrolyte disorders are very common complications in cancer patients. They might be associated to a worsening outcome, influencing quality of life, possibility to receive anticancer drugs, and conditioning survival. In fact, they might provoke important morbidity, with dysfunction of multiple organs and rarely causing life-threatening conditions. Moreover, recent studies showed that they might worsen cancer patients’ outcome, while a prompt correction seems to have a positive impact. Furthermore, there is evidence of a correlation between electrolyte alterations and poorer performance status, delays in therapy commencement and continuation, and negative treatment outcomes. -
Paraneoplastic Encephalomyelitis: Is It an Oropharyngeal Or a Lung Cancer Complication?
ONCOLOGY LETTERS 2: 171-174, 2011 Paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis: Is it an oropharyngeal or a lung cancer complication? MARÍA SERENO Moyano1, GERARDO GUTIÉRREZ-GUTIÉRREZ2, CÉSAR GÓMEZ-RAPOSO1, MIRIAM LÓPEZ GÓMEZ1, JOAQUÍN OJEDA2, AmBroSio mirAlleS2 and ENRIQUE CASADO-SÁENZ1 Departments of 1Oncology, and 2Neurology, Infanta Sofía Hospital, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain Received September 30, 2010; Accepted November 12, 2010 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2010.224 Abstract. This case report describes a patient with a locally tumor and the nervous system suggests that these disorders advanced oropharyngeal cancer with a simultaneous para- are immune-mediated. Numerous onconeural antibodies have neoplastic encephalomyelitis. To the best of our knowledge, a been described, but less than 50% of patients with PNS harbor paraneoplastic neurological syndrome is a rare complication these types of proteins. in head and neck cancer, and has previously not been reported Therefore, the absence of paraneoplastic antibodies in the literature. One year later, following initial treatment, does not exclude the diagnosis of PNS. The main neuro- a small cell lung cancer developed, a tumor frequently logical syndromes associated with paraneoplastic origin associated with this type of paraneoplastic syndrome. The include limbic encephalitis, subacute cerebellar ataxia, dilemma, therefore, is whether this paraneoplastic symdrome opsoclonus-myoclonus, retinopathies, chronic gastrointestinal was a secondary complication of the tonsilar concurrent cancer pseudoobstruction, sensory neuronopathy, Lambert-Eaton or a metachronous paraneoplastic syndrome prior to small myasthenic syndrome and encephalomyelitis (3). cell lung cancer. The majority of tumors associated with PNS are small cell lung cancer (SCLC), ovarian cancer and hematological Introduction diseases, mainly lymphomas. PNS in HNC is extremely rare. -
PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: First Published As 10.1136/Jnnp.2004.040378 on 14 May 2004
PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.040378 on 14 May 2004. Downloaded from WHEN TO SUSPECT, HOW TO CONFIRM, AND HOW TO MANAGE ii43 J H Rees J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl II):ii43–ii50. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.040378 eurological manifestations of cancer are common, disabling, and often multifactorial (table 1). The concept that malignant disease can cause damage to the nervous system Nabove and beyond that caused by direct or metastatic infiltration is familiar to all clinicians looking after cancer patients. These ‘‘remote effects’’ or paraneoplastic manifestations of cancer include metabolic and endocrine syndromes such as hypercalcaemia, and the syndrome of inappropriate ADH (antidiuretic hormone) secretion. Paraneoplastic neurological disorders (PNDs) are remote effects of systemic malignancies that affect the nervous system. The term PND is reserved for those disorders that are caused by an autoimmune response directed against antigens common to the tumour and nerve cells. PNDs are much less common than direct, metastatic, and treatment related complications of cancer, but are nevertheless important because they cause severe neurological morbidity and mortality and frequently present to the neurologist in a patient without a known malignancy. Because of the relative rarity of PND, neurological dysfunction should only be regarded as paraneoplastic if a particular neoplasm associates with a remote but specific effect on the nervous system more frequently than would be expected by chance. For example, subacute cerebellar ataxia in the setting of ovarian cancer is sufficiently characteristic to be called paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, as long as other causes have been ruled out. -
Understanding Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
Understanding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and deciding about treatment Understanding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and deciding about treatment Developed by National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre Funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Understanding ductal carcinoma in situ Contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................................2 How to use this resource ..............................................................................3 Introduction ...........................................................................................................4 Why do I need treatment for DCIS? .........................................................5 Surgery ......................................................................................................................7 Radiotherapy ......................................................................................................11 What is the risk of developing invasive breast cancer or Understanding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and deciding about treatment was prepared and produced by: DCIS after treatment? ....................................................................................12 National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre What follow-up will I need? .......................................................................17 Level 1 Suite 103/355 Crown Street Surry Hills NSW 2010 How can I get more emotional support? .........................................18 Locked Bag 3 -
Surgical Management of Brain Tumors
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF BRAIN TUMORS JASSIN M. JOURIA, MD DR. JASSIN M. JOURIA IS A MEDICAL DOCTOR, PROFESSOR OF ACADEMIC MEDICINE, AND MEDICAL AUTHOR. HE GRADUATED FROM ROSS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HAS COMPLETED HIS CLINICAL CLERKSHIP TRAINING IN VARIOUS TEACHING HOSPITALS THROUGHOUT NEW YORK, INCLUDING KING’S COUNTY HOSPITAL CENTER AND BROOKDALE MEDICAL CENTER, AMONG OTHERS. DR. JOURIA HAS PASSED ALL USMLE MEDICAL BOARD EXAMS, AND HAS SERVED AS A TEST PREP TUTOR AND INSTRUCTOR FOR KAPLAN. HE HAS DEVELOPED SEVERAL MEDICAL COURSES AND CURRICULA FOR A VARIETY OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. DR. JOURIA HAS ALSO SERVED ON MULTIPLE LEVELS IN THE ACADEMIC FIELD INCLUDING FACULTY MEMBER AND DEPARTMENT CHAIR. DR. JOURIA CONTINUES TO SERVES AS A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT FOR SEVERAL CONTINUING EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS COVERING MULTIPLE BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES. HE HAS ALSO DEVELOPED SEVERAL CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION COURSES COVERING VARIOUS TOPICS IN CLINICAL MEDICINE. RECENTLY, DR. JOURIA HAS BEEN CONTRACTED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI/JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL’S DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY TO DEVELOP AN E- MODULE TRAINING SERIES FOR TRAUMA PATIENT MANAGEMENT. DR. JOURIA IS CURRENTLY AUTHORING AN ACADEMIC TEXTBOOK ON HUMAN ANATOMY & PHYSIOLOGY. Abstract The field of brain tumor research, diagnosis, and treatment is rapidly evolving. Over 120 types of brain tumors have been identified to date, and that number continues to increase. As the information available about brain tumors grows, so does the ability to target screening and therapies to provide patients with optimal outcomes. It is critical that health clinicians understand the surgical and treatment options in order to educate patients and to develop a care plan that has a positive outcome while respecting the patient's needs and desires. -
Full Text (PDF)
Published OnlineFirst April 1, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0362 Cancer Prevention Research Article Research Inhibition of the Transition of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma by a Gemini Vitamin D Analog Joseph Wahler1, Jae Young So1, Yeoun Chan Kim1, Fang Liu1,2,3, Hubert Maehr1, Milan Uskokovic1, and Nanjoo Suh1,3 Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonmalignant lesion of the breast with the potential to progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The disappearance and breakdown of the myoepithelial cell layer and basement membrane in DCIS have been identified as major events in the development of breast cancer. The MCF10DCIS.com cell line is a well-established model, which recapitulates the progression of breast cancer from DCIS to IDC. We have previously reported that a novel Gemini vitamin D analog, 1a,25-dihydroxy- 20R-21(3-hydroxy-3-deuteromethyl-4,4,4-trideuterobutyl)-23-yne-26,27-hexafluoro-cholecalciferol (BXL0124) is a potent inhibitor of the growth of MCF10DCIS.com xenografted tumors without hypercal- cemic toxicity. In this study, we utilized the MCF10DCIS.com in vivo model to assess the effects of BXL0124 on breast cancer progression from weeks 1 to 4. Upon DCIS progression to IDC from weeks 3 to 4, tumors lost the myoepithelial cell layer and basement membrane as shown by immunofluorescence staining with smooth muscle actin and laminin 5, respectively. Administration of BXL0124 maintained the critical myoepithelial cell layer as well as basement membrane, and animals treated with BXL0124 showed a 43% reduction in tumor volume by week 4. -
Comprehensive Systematic Review: Treatment of Cerebellar Motor Dysfunction and Ataxia
Comprehensive systematic review: Treatment of cerebellar motor dysfunction and ataxia Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Theresa A. Zesiewicz, MD1; George Wilmot, MD2; Sheng-Han Kuo, MD3; Susan Perlman, MD4; Patricia E. Greenstein, MB, BCh5; Sarah H. Ying, MD6; Tetsuo Ashizawa, MD7; S.H. Subramony, MD8; Jeremy D. Schmahmann, MD9; K.P. Figueroa10; Hidehiro Mizusawa, MD11; Ludger Schöls, MD12; Jessica D. Shaw, MPH1; Richard M. Dubinsky, MD, MPH13; Melissa J. Armstrong, MD, MSc8; Gary S. Gronseth, MD13; Kelly L. Sullivan, PhD14 1) Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa 2) Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 3) Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY 4) Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles 5) Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 6) Shire, Lexington, MA, and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 7) Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, TX 8) Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 9) Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 10) Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 11) National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan 12) Department of Neurology and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany 13) Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 14) Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro Address correspondence and reprint requests to American Academy of Neurology: [email protected] Title character count: 71 Abstract word count: 254 Manuscript word count: 7,891 Approved by the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee on October 22, 2016; by the Practice Committee on October 2, 2017; and by the AAN Institute Board of Directors on December 5, 2017. -
Consensus Guideline on the Management of the Axilla in Patients with Invasive/In-Situ Breast Cancer
- Official Statement - Consensus Guideline on the Management of the Axilla in Patients With Invasive/In-Situ Breast Cancer Purpose To outline the management of the axilla for patients with invasive and in-situ breast cancer. Associated ASBrS Guidelines or Quality Measures 1. Performance and Practice Guidelines for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients – Revised November 25, 2014 2. Performance and Practice Guidelines for Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients – Approved November 25, 2014 3. Quality Measure: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer – Approved November 4, 2010 4. Prior Position Statement: Management of the Axilla in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer – Approved August 31, 2011 Methods A literature review inclusive of recent randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of sentinel lymph node surgery and axillary lymph node dissection for invasive and in-situ breast cancer as well as the pathologic review of sentinel lymph nodes and indications for axillary radiation was performed. This is not a complete systematic review but rather, a comprehensive review of recent relevant literature. A focused review of non-randomized controlled trials was then performed to develop consensus guidance on management of the axilla in scenarios where randomized controlled trials data is lacking. The ASBrS Research Committee developed a consensus document, which was reviewed and approved by the ASBrS Board of Directors. Summary of Data Reviewed Recommendations Based on Randomized Controlled -
Paraneoplastic Syndromes in Lung Cancer and Their Management
359 Review Article Page 1 of 9 Paraneoplastic syndromes in lung cancer and their management Asad Anwar1, Firas Jafri1, Sara Ashraf2, Mohammad Ali S. Jafri3, Michael Fanucchi3 1Department of Internal Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA; 2Department of Hematology/Oncology, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA; 3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: None; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: None; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: None; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Mohammad Ali S. Jafri, MD. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Paraneoplastic syndromes are most frequently associated with lung cancer. This review considers a variety paraneoplastic syndromes associated with lung cancer and discusses their pathophysiology, clinical features and management options. Keywords: Paraneoplastic syndromes; lung cancer; thoracic oncology Submitted Feb 12, 2019. Accepted for publication Apr 25, 2019. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.86 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.04.86 Introduction PTHrP production (parathyroid hormone related-protein), it is referred to as HHM. Paraneoplastic syndromes refer to the remote effects HHM is observed in a variety of malignancies such as associated with malignancy which are unrelated to direct breast, renal, multiple myeloma and lung; squamous cell tumor invasion or metastases (1). These may occur before is the most frequently observed subtype (3-5). Osteolytic the cancer is diagnosed and can be independent in their metastases are another significant cause of hypercalcemia in severity to the stage of the primary tumor.