DOCSLIB.ORG

MONROE COUNTY Schools of Choice ENROLLMENT PERIOD APRIL 1, 2021 - JUNE 25, 2021 ONLY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MONROE COUNTY Schools of Choice ENROLLMENT PERIOD APRIL 1, 2021 - JUNE 25, 2021 ONLY MONROE COUNTY Schools of Choice ENROLLMENT PERIOD APRIL 1, 2021 - JUNE 25, 2021 ONLY 2021-2022 Guidelines and Application What Parents Graduation/ and Guardians Step-By-Step Promotion Transportation and Timeline of the Important Dates Need to Know: Requirements and Information for The Schools Athletic Policies Application and Curriculum Process Parents of Choice Issues Application Process Deadlines TO REMEMBER To provide a quality education for all students in Monroe County, the Monroe County Schools of Choice STEP 1: Due June 25, 2021 Program is offered by the Monroe County Intermediate Application must be returned to the School District in cooperation with its constituent administration building of the resident districts. This program allows parents and students the district. choice to attend any public school in Monroe County, as STEP 2: July 9, 2021 determined by space available. Applicants are notified to inform them whether they have been accepted into Remember, a student must be released by his/her the Schools of Choice Program. resident district and be accepted by the choice district before he/she can enroll at the choice district. The STEP 3: August 6, 2021 Parents/guardians must formally accept student will not be able to start school unless ALL or reject acceptance into the Schools of paperwork is completed BEFORE THE START OF Choice Program. SCHOOL. The student must be formally registered at the choice district by Friday, August 13, 2021. STEP 4: August 13, 2021 Student must be formally registered at the choice school. The Schools of Choice Application Process WHAT PARENTS AND GUARDIANS NEED TO KNOW The application process for the • Students participating in this program • An application form must be completed Monroe County Schools of Choice who wish to return to their resident for each student wishing to participate school for the following year, must notify Program has been designed to the resident school district as soon in the choice program. Enrollment guarantee all applicants a fair and as possible, but not later than April 1, priority shall be given to the sibling of a equitable opportunity. immediately preceding the date of non-resident pupil from a participating re-enrollment. • Applications must be returned to the district already admitted and attending • Students who for disciplinary reasons administration building of the resident the choice school district under this district by the fourth Friday in June. have been suspended, expelled or otherwise released or excluded from policy. • The number of transfers allowed is their resident school district during the • If the number of applications for determined by the space available in preceding two years will not qualify for each participating district and the space this program. admission from choice students exceeds available at each building. The districts the number of available enrollment will not be required to release more than • A student approved to a choice district is 1% of the district’s enrollment from the allowed to remain in the choice district opportunities, choice pupils shall be previous year February audited count. until his/her class graduates from that selected for admission using a random school district. The student does not • All participants in the program are need to reapply for admission to the selection process. expected to attend their school of same choice school district each year, choice for the entire school year. During • All applications must be initiated by the once approved under the Monroe County the school year, requests for student Schools of Choice Program. parent/guardian of the student (or the transfers back to the student’s home choice student, if legally emancipated). school will be denied, unless there are • Applications for the program will be extreme extenuating circumstances. available from the participating school Such person making application bears districts and the Monroe County contractual and other legal responsibility Intermediate School District, and should for the payment of tuition, if any (as be returned to the resident school Nondiscrimination district. Applicants will be notified by established by the enrolling choice Policy the second Friday in July, to inform district), if the choice student is accepted The Board of Education of the them whether they have been released for enrollment in the choice district. Monroe County Intermediate from the resident district. Parents will be notified by the choice district by the • The decision of the local district School District, and the Boards fourth Friday in July if their choice school of the constituent districts, superintendent to approve or deny an is available. Parents need to accept or comply with all federal and state deny the school of choice by the first application for schools of choice is final. laws and regulations prohibiting Friday in August. The student must be An appeal by a parent/guardian will discrimination and with all formally registered in the choice school only be considered if there has been a requirements and regulations of by the second Friday in August. the United States Department of violation of the Monroe County Schools • It is recommended that parents/ Education and the Michigan State of Choice Application Process. If there guardians and students desiring to Department of Education. participate in the choice program meet has been a violation of the process, the with a building administrator or district appeal must be filed, in writing, with It is also the policy of the Monroe representative of the choice school to the Monroe County ISD Superintendent County Intermediate School District discuss school rules, curriculum, parent and its constituent districts, that involvement, graduation requirements, within 30 days of a parent receiving no person on the basis of sex, grade placement, possible tuition costs, notificationthat their application for race, color, religion, national origin and other school issues. schools of choice has been denied. The or ancestry, age, marital status, • There is no guarantee that space in the limited English, or handicap shall parent must provide information on how district selected will be available. be discriminated against, excluded the application process was violated. The • A student requesting a transfer is allowed from participation in, denied Monroe County ISD Superintendent will the benefits of, or otherwise be to request which district he/she would subjected to discrimination in any like to attend, and building preference. review an appeal within ten (10) days of program, employment practice, • The number of openings in a particular receipt. or activity for which they receive program for participating district • This appeal review will take place within financial assistance from the United students will be determined by States Department of Education or optimum size for a particular program 10 days of receipt of appeal by the the Michigan State Department of or classroom, which is the number of Monroe County Intermediate School Education. students that can be accommodated District. without increasing district expenditures for staff or equipment. Graduation/Promotion Requirements and Curriculum Issues Each participating school district has developed a curriculum that is based on the State of Michigan Core Curriculum Model. In addition, each district has its own locally approved grading system and graduation requirements. While there are some similarities • All districts will supply, at the request of Transportation Policy of requirements among districts, parents/guardians, a current listing of graduation requirements for the high It is the sole responsibility of parents/ parents/guardians should be aware school of choice. To receive a copy of guardians to transport their children of the following conditions of the graduation requirements, parents/ to and from the choice school. Monroe Monroe County Schools of Choice guardians should contact the high school County Schools of Choice participants are Program. principal of the school of choice. expected to arrive at the choice school on • Choice students seeking admission are time every day. • Participants are required to graduate subject to the academic and program Athletic Policy with the number of credits determined size standards of the choice school by the district they are attending at the district. Note on the New Sport Specific Transfer time of graduation. Regulation: See a summary of the Sport • Choice students accepted for enrollment • It is recommended that before a are subject to the determinations Specific Transfer Regulation available in student transfer is finalized, parents/ of the choice district concerning the the high school principal’s office or visit the guardians and the student(s) meet awarding of transfer academic credit, MHSAA website, www.mhsaa.com. with a counselor/administrator in the academic assignment or placement • Students will follow the choice district’s choice school district to review all based upon completion of courses or policies for participation in the school’s rules, regulations, grading system and grades in districts or schools where the athletic activities. graduation requirements. non-resident student has previously attended. • Participating districts comply with pertinent regulations of the Michigan • Choice students accepted for enrollment High School Athletic Association and are subject to facility, grade and course any relevant league standards regarding assignments within the choice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Next Steps: a School District's Guide to the Essential Elements of Service-Learning Maryland Student Service Alliance
    University of Nebraska Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO School K-12 Service Learning 3-2004 Next Steps: A School District's Guide to the Essential Elements of Service-Learning Maryland Student Service Alliance Maryland State Department of Education Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcek12 Part of the Service Learning Commons Recommended Citation Maryland Student Service Alliance and Maryland State Department of Education, "Next Steps: A School District's Guide to the Essential Elements of Service-Learning" (2004). School K-12. Paper 22. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcek12/22 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Service Learning at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in School K-12 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Next Steps: A School District's Guide to the Essential Elements of Service-Learning Maryland Student Service Alliance Maryland State Department of Education Revised 2004 CONTENTS Letter from the State Superintendent • 2 Acknowledgments • 3 Introduction • 5 Next Steps at a Glance • 9 INFRASTRUCTURE • 11 Instructional Design .12 Communication .14 Funding & In-Kind Resources .16 School-Level Support .18 Data Collection .20 INSTRUCTION .23 Organizational Roles & Responsibilities .24 Connections with Education Initiatives .26 Curriculum .28 Professional Development & Training .30 Evaluation .32 Research .34 INVESTMENT Student Leadership Community Partnerships Public Support & Involvement Recognition Feedback Form Resources Nancy S. Grasmick Achievement Matters Most State Superintendent of Schools 200 West Baltimore March 2004 Dear Champion of Service: We are pleased to share a new tool for service-learning. Next Steps: A School District's Guide to the Essential Elements ofService-Learning is an excellent guide for state level or school district administrators as they create or improve their service-learning program, regardless of their previous experience in service-learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific School System Becomes a Leader in Implementing Instructional
    SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT | SUCCESS STORY Pacific school system becomes a leader in implementing instructional leadership success strategies Services McREL provided to the CNMI: Results: ACT Aspire Writing Academic standards Third-grade reading measures Literacy in ELL classrooms on the ACT Aspire Technology evaluation Writing Test increased from School improvement 29% to 41% Principal leadership at Kolberville Elementary Leadership program implementation from 2014–15 to 2015–16. Third-grade Reading Measures Literacy coach training at Kolberville Elementary Results: Leadership and Student Success “We don’t just talk about McREL’s Balanced Leadership, we are • At Kolberville Elementary, in the 2015–16 living it. We have made principals school year, students increased average accountable to the learning of their Lexile® scores by +90L students and the performance • Principal pipeline serving 19 schools on 15 of their teachers, and the district islands accountable to the principals and • Newfound focus on accountability impacting the support they need. entire system ” — Rita Sablan, former commissioner of education, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Customized consulting improves education leadership capacity in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands The Challenge Results When your school district is located thousands of miles from Many CNMI educators call their experience with Balanced pretty much everywhere on Earth, recruiting principals from Leadership Implementation Support life-changing, said Mel the district next door is not an option. That’s why the public Sussman, a McREL consultant who works closely with the school system of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana islands. Islands (CNMI) recently expanded its longstanding relationship “It’s been amazing to watch their confidence and competence with McREL, from addressing student outcomes to creating a skyrocket,” Sussman said.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Spring Student Head Count*
    2019 Spring Student Head Count* Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade Combined Building Name District Name Total Total 12 Total Total 54th Street Academy Kelloggsville Public Schools 21 36 24 81 A.D. Johnston Jr/Sr High School Bessemer Area School District 39 33 31 103 Academic and Career Education Academy Academic and Career Education Academy 27 21 27 75 Academy 21 Center Line Public Schools 43 26 38 107 Academy for Business and Technology High School Academy for Business and Technology 41 17 35 93 Academy of Science Math and Technology Early College High School Mason County Central Schools 0 0 39 39 Academy of The Americas High School Detroit Public Schools Community District 39 40 14 93 Academy West Alternative Education Westwood Heights Schools 84 70 86 240 ACCE Ypsilanti Community Schools 28 48 70 146 Accelerated Learning Academy Flint, School District of the City of 40 16 11 67 ACE Academy - Jefferson site ACE Academy (SDA) 1 2 0 3 ACE Academy (SDA) -Glendale, Lincoln, Woodward ACE Academy (SDA) 50 50 30 130 Achievement High School Roseville Community Schools 3 6 11 20 Ackerson Lake Community Education Napoleon Community Schools 15 21 15 51 ACTech High School Ypsilanti Community Schools 122 142 126 390 Addison High School Addison Community Schools 57 54 60 171 Adlai Stevenson High School Utica Community Schools 597 637 602 1836 Adrian Community High School Adrian Public Schools 6 10 20 36 Adrian High School Adrian Public Schools 187 184 180 551 Advanced Technology Academy Advanced Technology Academy 106 100 75 281 Advantage Alternative Program
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to State and Local Census Geography
    Guide to State and Local Census Geography District of Columbia BASIC INFORMATION 2010 Census Population: 601,723 Land Area: 61.1 square miles Density: 9,856.5 persons per square mile Bordering States: Maryland, Virginia Abbreviation: DC ANSI/FIPS Code: 11 HISTORY The area of the District of Columbia was part of the original territory of the United States. The District of Columbia was formed from territory ceded by Maryland and Virginia in 1788, and was established in accordance with Acts of Congress passed in 1790 and 1791. Its boundary, a square ten miles on a side with vertices at the cardinal points to resemble a diamond, was established on March 30, 1791, and included all of the territory within present-day Arlington County, Virginia, and part of Alexandria city, Virginia. The portion south of the Potomac River was retroceded to Virginia in 1846. Census data for the District of Columbia are available beginning with the 1800 census. The population shown for the District of Columbia from 1800 to 1840 does not include the portion of Virginia legally included in the district at the time of those censuses. The population of the District of Columbia as legally existent in those censuses is: 43,712 in 1840; 39,834 in 1830; 33,039 in 1820; 24,023 in 1810; and 14,093 in 1800. Congress abolished the original county (Washington County) and incorporated places (Georgetown and Washington cities) in the District of Columbia in 1871, but later reestablished the city of Washington. The Census Bureau continued to recognize the boundaries of the previously existing areas for the 1880 and 1890 censuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Page
    17 section :: 17 Education Liaisons for Homeless Children and Youth The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, as reauthorized by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), requires state educational agencies to ensure that homeless children and youth have equal access to the same free public education, including a public preschool education, as is provided to other children and youth. States must review and undertake steps to revise any laws, regulations, practices, or policies that may act as barriers to the enrollment, attendance, or success in school of homeless children and youth. School districts and schools may not separate homeless students from the mainstream school environment on the basis of their homelessness. Homeless students must also have access to the education and other services that they need to have an opportunity to meet the same challenging state academic achievement standards to which all students are held. It is a requirement that all school districts and public school academies have a designated appropriate staff person and a local education liaison for homeless children and youth. This person may also be the coordinator for other federal programs. This assurance guarantees that a homeless student will have a full and equal opportunity to succeed in school. Education Liaisons for Homeless Children and Youth Academic and Career Education Academy Academy of Detroit-West, Redford Campus Michelle Zielinski Role(s) / Title(s): LaTonya Pringle Role(s) / Title(s): Homeless Education Homeless Education 884 E. Isabella Rd. Liaison 23749 Elmira Liaison Midland, MI 48640 Redford, MI 48239 Phone: (989) 631-5202 #217 Phone: (313) 387-9238 Fax: (989) 631-4541 Fax: (313) 387-9261 [email protected] [email protected] Academic Transitional Academy Academy of Flint Laura McDowell Role(s) / Title(s): Verdell Duncan Role(s) / Title(s): Homeless Education Homeless Education St.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Memorandum of Agreement Kentucky Christian
    Partnership Memorandum of Agreement Kentucky Christian University and ________________ School District Development and Implementation of Teacher Leader Master’s At Kentucky Christian University. Summary of Teacher Leader Master’s Programs Kentucky Christian University (KCU) has developed a Teacher Leader Master’s in accordance with the guidelines set out by the Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB) leading to Kentucky certification rank change. Through this program, KCU is striving to close the gap between teacher preparation and teaching practice that directly impacts student learning. To achieve this goal, KCU is committed to a collaborative role that includes all stakeholders in the educational organizations and to providing experiences related to emerging models of teams or communities of practice. Given this goal, and in accordance with the Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB) Teacher Leader Master’s Program guidelines (2008), the framework for the Teacher Leader Master’s Programs has been developed collaboratively with administrators and teachers from five surrounding counties and Keeran School of Education. Meetings were held at county facilities with teachers, district- and school-based administrators, and KCU faculty from educator preparation. During these meetings, the goal of partnerships was presented and small focus groups led by university instructors were conducted to solicit the needs of all stakeholders with regard to teacher preparation, continuing education, and job- embedded professional development. Along, with focus group meetings, surveys were sent out to all faculty at various schools concerning assessment issues, interpretation of standards, new course development, and professional development needs. The dean of the School of Education along with other KCU personnel, met with numerous school superintendents and instructional supervisors to solicit support in a university-district partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Bulletin 1014
    2019-20 BULLETIN 1014 Michigan Public School Districts Ranked By Selected Financial Data Published March 2021 Michigan State Board of Education Casandra E. Ulbrich, President Pamela Pugh, Vice President Tiffany D. Tilley, Secretary Tom McMillin, Treasurer Judith Pritchett, NASBE Delegate Ellen Cogen Lipton Nikki Snyder Jason Strayhorn Ex Officio Members Gretchen Whitmer Governor Michael F. Rice, Ph.D. State Superintendent FOREWORD The Bulletin 1014 is prepared to provide financial and statistical information relating to Michigan public schools. Caution should be exercised in using these data. Figures presented in this publication were supplied by each school district, and the Michigan Department of Education is not responsible for the validity of the data provided. Sound conclusions can be drawn only when the data elements are used in proper context. A glossary of the terms used in the headings of the bulletin and other general and specific terms common to school financial data is included. The printed version of the Bulletin 1014 publication contains financial information grouped by statewide and major membership groupings only. A chart labeled "Bulletin 1014 Insert" gives a synopsis of the membership grouping data. A file with the Bulletin 1014 information is available via the Michigan Department of Education website. The address is http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140--21514--,00.html. Primary distribution is via electronic means. Statement of Compliance with Federal Law The Michigan Department of Education (MDE) is in compliance with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. (Title IX), and its implementing regulation, at 34 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Options Available for Many American Indian and Alaska Native Students
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters January 2019 PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE Limited Options Available for Many American Indian and Alaska Native Students GAO-19-226 January 2019 PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE Limited Options Available for Many American Indian and Alaska Native Students Highlights of GAO-19-226, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Education refers to school choice as Few areas provide American Indian and Alaska Native students (Indian students) the opportunity for students and their school choice options other than traditional public schools. According to GAO’s families to create high-quality, analysis of 2015-16 Department of Education (Education) data, most of the personalized paths for learning that school districts with Indian student enrollment of at least 25 percent had only best meet the students’ needs. For traditional public schools (378 of 451 districts, or 84 percent). The remaining 73 Indian students, school choice can be districts had at least one choice, such as a Bureau of Indian Education, charter, a means of accessing instructional magnet, or career and technical education school (see figure). Most of these 451 programs that reflect and preserve districts were in rural areas near tribal lands. Rural districts may offer few school their languages, cultures, and histories. choice options because, for example, they do not have enough students to justify For many years, studies have shown additional schools or they may face difficulties recruiting and retaining teachers, that Indian students have struggled academically and the nation’s K-12 among other challenges. schools have not consistently provided School Districts with American Indian and Alaska Native Student Enrollment of at Least 25 Indian students with high-quality and Percent, School Year 2015-16 culturally-relevant educational opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Annual Report FERRIS Final.Indd
    Making an IMPACT in Michigan Charter Schools ANNUAL REPORT 2014/2015 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY &KDUWHU6FKRROV2IILFH Charter Schools OfÀ ce Charter Schools OfÞ ce Ferris State University Big Rapids, MI 49307 (231) 591-5802 www.ferris.edu/charterschools 4 Welcome 5 Vision/Mission/ Core Values 6 Academy Boards of Directors Allen Academy 8 Highlights & Accomplishments 10 By the Numbers 12 M-Step Results Battle Creek Montessori Academy 13 Ferris Charter School Locations 14 Academy ProÞ les Lighthouse Academy FROM THE DIRECTOR On behalf of all of us at the Ferris State University Charter Schools Offi ce (FSU-CSO), it is our pleasure to present the 2014-15 Annual Report. This publication offers a broad overview of the performance of the public school academies authorized by FSU and the work of the CSO. While some basic performance data is included in this report, it was not practical nor our intent to include all data for each academy. Readers who wish to gather more information in this area are directed to the CSO website: ferris.edu/charterschools. It is there that one can fi nd a wealth of performance data on each academy over a period of years. As an Authorizer of public school academies, Ferris State University strives to provide the highest quality of oversight and accountability consistent with best practice and State and federal law. We greatly appreciate your taking the time to get to know more about FSU-authorized academies and the extraordinary work being accomplished by caring and skilled educators throughout our State. Ronald S. Rizzo, Ph.D. Director FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Gary Granger Alisha M.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Press Release for 2017 Event
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MCISD CONTACT: Jennifer LaDuke September 29, 2017 734.322.2720 [email protected] BDC CONTACT: Tim C. Lake 734.241.8081 [email protected] Local manufacturers to host plant tours for students in celebration of Manufacturing Day Events designed to expand knowledge and improve public perception of manufacturing career opportunities Monroe. MI — Multiple manufacturers across the region will open their doors simultaneously to celebrate National Manufacturing Day (MFG Day) on Oct. 6, 2017. These events are part of an effort to change perceptions about today’s manufacturing environment and draw attention to the outstanding opportunities that a career in manufacturing can provide. The Monroe County Intermediate School District (MCISD) and the Monroe County Business Development Corporation (BDC) are coordinating Monroe County’s efforts in a region-wide initiative, covering Hillsdale, Jackson, Lenawee, Livingston, Monroe and Washtenaw counties, with the goal of exposing 1,000 middle and high school students to local manufacturing career opportunities in one day. In Monroe County, we have eleven manufacturers participating: Accuworx, Automatic Handling, Fischer Tool & Die, Fluid Equipment Design Company (Fedco), Gerdau, Hanwha, Midway Products Group, Premier Industries, Spiratex and Ventower Industries. “We appreciate our manufacturing community taking the time from their business schedules to open their shop floors to our students,” said Tim Lake President and CEO of the Monroe County Business Development Corporation. “Allowing our students to tour and ask questions about the various careers associated in todays advanced manufacturing environment is extremely helpful as students explore various careers,” Lake continued. Schools from all nine districts will be participating which include Airport Community Schools, Bedford Public Schools, Dundee Community Schools, Ida Public Schools, Jefferson Schools, Mason Consolidated Schools, Monroe Public Schools, Summerfield Schools and Whiteford Agricultural Schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2019 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
    Fiscal Year 2019 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - MICHIGAN No data No data No data LEA ID District FY 2019 Title I Allocation 2601890 Adams Township School District 48,702 2601920 Addison Community Schools 176,777 2601950 Adrian City School District 1,065,733 2601980 Airport Community School District 592,071 2602010 Akron-Fairgrove Schools 109,502 2621810 Alanson Public Schools 122,097 2602040 Alba Public Schools 54,249 2602160 Alcona Community Schools 294,838 2602190 Algonac Community School District 320,379 2602220 Allegan Public Schools 500,720 2602520 Allen Park Public Schools 302,176 2602550 Allendale Public School District 199,237 2602640 Alma Public Schools 638,109 2602670 Almont Community Schools 106,882 2602730 Alpena Public Schools 1,090,796 2602790 Anchor Bay School District 444,963 2602820 Ann Arbor Public Schools 1,992,536 2603060 Arenac Eastern School District 145,018 2603240 Armada Area Schools 52,311 2603270 Arvon Township School District 0 2603480 Ashley Community Schools 81,924 2603510 Athens Area Schools 187,809 2603540 Atherton Community Schools 343,521 2603570 Atlanta Community Schools 150,532 2603600 Au Gres-Sims School District 142,341 2603660 Autrain-Onota Public Schools 28,736 2603690 Avondale School District 291,470 2600017 Bad Axe Public Schools 272,994 2603810 Baldwin Community Schools 718,564 2603870 Bangor Public Schools 455,527 2603960 Bangor Township School District 8 14,476 2603900 Bangor Township Schools 515,938 2603990 Baraga Area Schools 129,234 2604020 Bark River-Harris School District
    [Show full text]
  • SAMS/Fidreports/Indirectratessummary.Rdl Page 1 / 22 Michigan Department of Education Local District Indirect Cost Rates
    *** Final *** Michigan Department of Education *** Final *** Local District Indirect Cost Rates for School Year 2018-2019 Based on 2016-2017 Costs R0418 Rate Summary Report * * ** District Restricted Unrestricted Medicaid Code District Name Rate Rate Rate 01010 Alcona Community Schools 6.45 17.03 17.03 02010 AuTrain-Onota Public Schools 12.60 21.95 21.95 02020 Burt Township School District 3.81 20.22 20.22 02070 Munising Public Schools 5.02 18.36 19.23 02080 Superior Central School District 4.67 13.99 12.65 03000 Allegan Area Educational Service Agency 11.75 23.05 26.06 03010 Plainwell Community Schools 2.34 14.74 13.86 03020 Otsego Public Schools 2.65 14.73 13.60 03030 Allegan Public Schools 1.80 12.37 12.36 03040 Wayland Union Schools 3.80 15.38 15.37 03050 Fennville Public Schools 3.78 22.90 22.63 03060 Martin Public Schools 5.37 18.99 19.36 03070 Hopkins Public Schools 3.96 16.78 14.02 03080 Saugatuck Public Schools 5.29 13.66 13.66 03100 Hamilton Community Schools 1.56 8.77 8.77 03440 Glenn Public School District 9.90 64.11 63.24 03902 Outlook Academy 3.55 7.24 7.24 04000 Alpena-Montmorency-Alcona ESD 15.63 15.17 15.17 04010 Alpena Public Schools 3.32 15.15 13.81 05010 Alba Public Schools 4.95 19.27 17.30 05035 Central Lake Public Schools 0.00 12.26 12.26 05040 Bellaire Public Schools 2.85 18.43 17.61 05060 Elk Rapids Schools 3.35 12.50 12.50 05065 Ellsworth Community School 2.31 8.33 8.33 05070 Mancelona Public Schools 4.47 17.50 19.63 06010 Arenac Eastern School District 2.26 19.18 21.61 06020 Au Gres-Sims School District 3.03 14.08
    [Show full text]