Functional Signatures of the Epiphytic Prokaryotic Microbiome of Agaves and Cacti
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Endobacter Medicaginis Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov. Isolated from Alfalfa Nodules In
IJSEM Papers in Press. Published September 21, 2012 as doi:10.1099/ijs.0.041368-0 1 Endobacter medicaginis gen. nov. sp. nov. isolated from alfalfa nodules in an acidic 2 soil in Spain 3 4 Martha Helena Ramírez-Bahena1,2, Carmen Tejedor3, Isidro Martín3, Encarna 5 Velázquez2, 3, Alvaro Peix1,2* 6 7 8 1: Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca. Consejo Superior de 9 Investigaciones Científicas. (IRNASA-CSIC). Salamanca. Spain. 10 2: Unidad Asociada Grupo de Interacciones planta-microorganismo Universidad de 11 Salamanca-IRNASA (CSIC). Salamanca. Spain 12 3: Departamento de Microbiología y Genética. Universidad de Salamanca. Salamanca. 13 Spain 14 15 16 17 18 Running title: Endobacter medicaginis gen. nov. sp. nov. 19 20 Abstract 21 A bacterial strain designed M1MS02T was isolated from a surface sterilised nodule of 22 Medicago sativa in Zamora (Spain). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of this strain showed 23 96.5 and 96.2% identities, respectively, with respect to Gluconacetobacter liquefaciens 24 IFO 12388T and Granulibacter bethesdensis CGDNIH1T from the Family 25 Acetobacteraceae. The isolate was Gram negative, non-sporulated aerobic motile by a 26 subpolar flagellum coccoid to rod-shaped bacterium. Major fatty acid is C18:1 7c 27 (39.94%) and major ubiquinone is Q-10. The lipid profile consisted of 28 diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, two aminophospholipids, three 29 aminolipids, four glycolipids, two phospholipids and a lipid. Catalase positive and 30 oxidase and urease negative. Acetate and lactate are not oxydized. Acetic acid is 31 produced from ethanol in culture media supplemented with 2% CaCO3. Ammonium 32 sulphate is assimilated in glucose medium. -
The Soil Microbiome Influences Grapevine-Associated Microbiota
RESEARCH ARTICLE crossmark The Soil Microbiome Influences Grapevine-Associated Microbiota Iratxe Zarraonaindia,a,b Sarah M. Owens,a,c Pamela Weisenhorn,c Kristin West,d Jarrad Hampton-Marcell,a,e Simon Lax,e Nicholas A. Bokulich,f David A. Mills,f Gilles Martin,g Safiyh Taghavi,d Daniel van der Lelie,d Jack A. Gilberta,e,h,i,j Argonne National Laboratory, Institute for Genomic and Systems Biology, Argonne, Illinois, USAa; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spainb; Computation Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USAc; Center of Excellence for Agricultural Biosolutions, FMC Corporation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USAd; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USAe; Departments of Viticulture and Enology; Food Science and Technology; Foods for Health Institute, University of California, Davis, California, USAf; Sparkling Pointe, Southold, New York, USAg; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USAh; Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USAi; College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Chinaj ABSTRACT Grapevine is a well-studied, economically relevant crop, whose associated bacteria could influence its organoleptic properties. In this study, the spatial and temporal dynamics of the bacterial communities associated with grapevine organs (leaves, flowers, grapes, and roots) and soils were characterized over two growing seasons to determine the influence of vine cul- tivar, edaphic parameters, vine developmental stage (dormancy, flowering, preharvest), and vineyard. Belowground bacterial communities differed significantly from those aboveground, and yet the communities associated with leaves, flowers, and grapes shared a greater proportion of taxa with soil communities than with each other, suggesting that soil may serve as a bacterial res- ervoir. -
Exploration of Plant-Microbe Interactions for Sustainable Agriculture in CRISPR Era
microorganisms Review Exploration of Plant-Microbe Interactions for Sustainable Agriculture in CRISPR Era 1, 1, 1,2, Rahul Mahadev Shelake y , Dibyajyoti Pramanik y and Jae-Yean Kim * 1 Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea 2 Division of Life Science (CK1 Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 19 July 2019; Accepted: 14 August 2019; Published: 17 August 2019 Abstract: Plants and microbes are co-evolved and interact with each other in nature. Plant-associated microbes, often referred to as plant microbiota, are an integral part of plant life. Depending on the health effects on hosts, plant–microbe (PM) interactions are either beneficial or harmful. The role of microbiota in plant growth promotion (PGP) and protection against various stresses is well known. Recently, our knowledge of community composition of plant microbiome and significant driving factors have significantly improved. So, the use of plant microbiome is a reliable approach for a next green revolution and to meet the global food demand in sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture. An application of the multifaceted PM interactions needs the use of novel tools to know critical genetic and molecular aspects. Recently discovered clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas-mediated genome editing (GE) tools are of great interest to explore PM interactions. A systematic understanding of the PM interactions will enable the application of GE tools to enhance the capacity of microbes or plants for agronomic trait improvement. -
The Study on the Cultivable Microbiome of the Aquatic Fern Azolla Filiculoides L
applied sciences Article The Study on the Cultivable Microbiome of the Aquatic Fern Azolla Filiculoides L. as New Source of Beneficial Microorganisms Artur Banach 1,* , Agnieszka Ku´zniar 1, Radosław Mencfel 2 and Agnieszka Woli ´nska 1 1 Department of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (A.W.) 2 Department of Animal Physiology and Toxicology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-708 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-81-454-5442 Received: 6 May 2019; Accepted: 24 May 2019; Published: 26 May 2019 Abstract: The aim of the study was to determine the still not completely described microbiome associated with the aquatic fern Azolla filiculoides. During the experiment, 58 microbial isolates (43 epiphytes and 15 endophytes) with different morphologies were obtained. We successfully identified 85% of microorganisms and assigned them to 9 bacterial genera: Achromobacter, Bacillus, Microbacterium, Delftia, Agrobacterium, and Alcaligenes (epiphytes) as well as Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and Acinetobacter (endophytes). We also studied an A. filiculoides cyanobiont originally classified as Anabaena azollae; however, the analysis of its morphological traits suggests that this should be renamed as Trichormus azollae. Finally, the potential of the representatives of the identified microbial genera to synthesize plant growth-promoting substances such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cellulase and protease enzymes, siderophores and phosphorus (P) and their potential of utilization thereof were checked. Delftia sp. AzoEpi7 was the only one from all the identified genera exhibiting the ability to synthesize all the studied growth promoters; thus, it was recommended as the most beneficial bacteria in the studied microbiome. -
11 Microbial Communities in the Phyllosphere Johan H.J
Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 11 Microbial communities in the phyllosphere Johan H.J. Leveau 11.1 Introduction The term phyllosphere was coined by Last (1955) and Ruinen (1956) to describe the plant leaf surface as an environment that is physically, chemically and biologically distinct from the plant leaf itself or the air surrounding it. The term phylloplane has been used also, either instead of or in addition to the term phyllosphere. Its two- dimensional connotation, however, does not do justice to the three dimensions that characterise the phyllosphere from the perspective of many of its microscopic inhab- itants. On a global scale, the phyllosphere is arguably one of the largest biological surfaces colonised by microorganisms. Satellite images have allowed a conservative approximation of 4 × 108 km2 for the earth’s terrestrial surface area covered with foliage (Morris and Kinkel, 2002). It has been estimated that this leaf surface area is home to an astonishing 1026 bacteria (Morris and Kinkel, 2002), which are the most abundant colonisers of cuticular surfaces. Thus, the phyllosphere represents a significant refuge and resource of microorganisms on this planet. Often-used terms in phyllosphere microbiology are epiphyte and epiphytic (Leben, 1965; Hirano and Upper, 1983): here, microbial epiphytes or epiphytic microorganisms, which include bacteria, fungi and yeasts, are defined as being cap- able of surviving and thriving on plant leaf and fruit surfaces. Several excellent reviews on phyllosphere microbiology have appeared so far (Beattie and Lindow, 1995, 1999; Andrews and Harris, 2000; Hirano and Upper, 2000; Lindow and Leveau, 2002; Lindow and Brandl, 2003). -
Optimize the Plant Microbiota to Increase Plant Growth and Health
July 2019 POSITION PAPER Optimize the plant microbiota to increase plant growth and health Barret M. (INRA, IRHS), Dufour P. (RAGT), Durand-Tardif M. (GIS BV), Mariadassou M. (INRA, MaIAGE), Mougel C. (INRA, IGEPP), Perez P. (Limagrain), Roumagnac P. (Cirad, BGPI), Sanguin H. (Cirad, BGPI), Steinberg C. (INRA, Agroécologie), Szambien M. (GIS BV) The “Groupement d’Intérêt Scientifique Biotechnologies Vertes” (GIS BV) organized on November 13th, 2018 in Paris, a scientific workshop on “Metagenomics for agro-ecosystems management and plant breeding”. Thirty-four scientists, including eight from the private sector attended the workshop. General discussion was organized around the presentations related to plant, seeds and soil microbiota, and data treatment to reconstruct interaction networks. This article gathers the current French research strengths, relative to the international context and highlights the research priorities between the public and the private sectors, using plant genetics and plant-microbiota interactions for the benefit of future agricultures. plant productivity. Hence, over recent years a Socio-economic context, scientific number of research groups explored the impact of challenges and opportunities environmental factors and host genetic variation on the composition and dynamics of plant microbiota [12–19]. Overall, these studies Plants live in association with a wide diverse and acknowledged an important influence of the complex assembly of viruses and microorganisms environment on plant microbiota composition and including -
Chemosynthetic Symbiont with a Drastically Reduced Genome Serves As Primary Energy Storage in the Marine Flatworm Paracatenula
Chemosynthetic symbiont with a drastically reduced genome serves as primary energy storage in the marine flatworm Paracatenula Oliver Jäcklea, Brandon K. B. Seaha, Målin Tietjena, Nikolaus Leischa, Manuel Liebekea, Manuel Kleinerb,c, Jasmine S. Berga,d, and Harald R. Gruber-Vodickaa,1 aMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany; bDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; cDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; and dInstitut de Minéralogie, Physique des Matériaux et Cosmochimie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France Edited by Margaret J. McFall-Ngai, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, and approved March 1, 2019 (received for review November 7, 2018) Hosts of chemoautotrophic bacteria typically have much higher thrive in both free-living environmental and symbiotic states, it is biomass than their symbionts and consume symbiont cells for difficult to attribute their genomic features to either functions nutrition. In contrast to this, chemoautotrophic Candidatus Riegeria they provide to their host, or traits that are necessary for envi- symbionts in mouthless Paracatenula flatworms comprise up to ronmental survival or to both. half of the biomass of the consortium. Each species of Paracate- The smallest genomes of chemoautotrophic symbionts have nula harbors a specific Ca. Riegeria, and the endosymbionts have been observed for the gammaproteobacterial symbionts of ves- been vertically transmitted for at least 500 million years. Such icomyid clams that are directly transmitted between host genera- prolonged strict vertical transmission leads to streamlining of sym- tions (13, 14). Such strict vertical transmission leads to substantial biont genomes, and the retained physiological capacities reveal and ongoing genome reduction. -
Roseomonas Aerofrigidensis Sp. Nov., Isolated from an Air Conditioner
TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION Hyeon and Jeon, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:4039–4044 DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.002246 Roseomonas aerofrigidensis sp. nov., isolated from an air conditioner Jong Woo Hyeon and Che Ok Jeon* Abstract A Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic bacterium, designated HC1T, was isolated from an air conditioner in South Korea. Cells were orange, non-motile cocci with oxidase- and catalase-positive activities and did not contain bacteriochlorophyll a. Growth of strain HC1T was observed at 10–45 C (optimum, 30 C), pH 4.5–9.5 (optimum, pH 7.0) and 0–3 % (w/v) NaCl T (optimum, 0 %). Strain HC1 contained summed feature 8 (comprising C18 : 1!7c/C18 : 1!6c), C16 : 0 and cyclo-C19 : 0!8c as the major fatty acids and ubiquinone-10 as the sole isoprenoid quinone. Phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and an unknown aminolipid were detected as the major polar lipids. The major carotenoid was hydroxyspirilloxanthin. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 70.1 mol%. Phylogenetic analysis, based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, showed that strain HC1T formed a phylogenetic lineage within the genus Roseomonas. Strain HC1T was most closely related to the type strains of Roseomonas oryzae, Roseomonas rubra, Roseomonas aestuarii and Roseomonas rhizosphaerae with 98.1, 97.9, 97.6 and 96.8 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities, respectively, but the DNA–DNA relatedness values between strain HC1T and closely related type strains were less than 70 %. Based on phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and molecular properties, strain HC1T represents a novel species of the genus Roseomonas, for which the name Roseomonas aerofrigidensis sp. -
Distribution Pattern Analysis of Epiphytic Bacteria On
Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2 (2014) 34–40 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmau Original Article Distribution pattern analysis of epiphytic bacteria on ethnomedicinal plant surfaces: A micrographical and molecular approach ∗ Fenella Mary War Nongkhlaw, S.R. Joshi Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India a r a t i c l e i n f o b s t r a c t Article history: The epiphytic bacterial community prevalent on ethnomedicinal plant surfaces were stud- Received 29 November 2013 ied for their diversity, niche localization and colonization using the micrographical and Received in revised form 4 February 2014 molecular approaches. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed the presence of large Accepted 10 February 2014 aggregates of bacterial communities. The bacterial localization was observed in the grooves Available online 5 March 2014 along the veins, stomata and near the trichomes of leaves and along the root hairs. A total of 20 cultivable epiphytes were characterized which were analyzed for richness, evenness and Keywords: diversity indices. Species belonging to the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas were the most Plant surfaces abundant. Bacillus thuringiensis was the most prevalent epiphyte with the ability to form Epiphytic bacteria biofilm, as a mode of adaptation to environmental stresses. Biofilm formation explains the Microscopy potential importance of cooperative interactions of epiphytes among both homogeneous Biofilm and heterogeneous populations observed under SEM and influencing the development of microbial communities. The study has revealed a definite pattern in the diversity of cultur- able epiphytic bacteria, host-dependent colonization, microhabitat localization and biofilm formation which play a significant role in plant–microbe interaction. -
Metaproteomics Characterization of the Alphaproteobacteria
Avian Pathology ISSN: 0307-9457 (Print) 1465-3338 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cavp20 Metaproteomics characterization of the alphaproteobacteria microbiome in different developmental and feeding stages of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778) José Francisco Lima-Barbero, Sandra Díaz-Sanchez, Olivier Sparagano, Robert D. Finn, José de la Fuente & Margarita Villar To cite this article: José Francisco Lima-Barbero, Sandra Díaz-Sanchez, Olivier Sparagano, Robert D. Finn, José de la Fuente & Margarita Villar (2019) Metaproteomics characterization of the alphaproteobacteria microbiome in different developmental and feeding stages of the poultry red mite Dermanyssusgallinae (De Geer, 1778), Avian Pathology, 48:sup1, S52-S59, DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2019.1635679 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2019.1635679 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa View supplementary material UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Accepted author version posted online: 03 Submit your article to this journal Jul 2019. Published online: 02 Aug 2019. Article views: 694 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cavp20 AVIAN PATHOLOGY 2019, VOL. 48, NO. S1, S52–S59 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2019.1635679 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Metaproteomics characterization of the alphaproteobacteria microbiome in different developmental and feeding stages of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778) José Francisco Lima-Barbero a,b, Sandra Díaz-Sanchez a, Olivier Sparagano c, Robert D. Finn d, José de la Fuente a,e and Margarita Villar a aSaBio. -
Recent Developments in the Study of Plant Microbiomes
microorganisms Review Recent Developments in the Study of Plant Microbiomes Bernard R. Glick 1 and Elisa Gamalero 2,* 1 Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”, Viale Teresa Michel, 11, 15121 Alessandria, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: To date, an understanding of how plant growth-promoting bacteria facilitate plant growth has been primarily based on studies of individual bacteria interacting with plants under different conditions. More recently, it has become clear that specific soil microorganisms interact with one another in consortia with the collective being responsible for the positive effects on plant growth. Different plants attract different cross-sections of the bacteria and fungi in the soil, initially based on the composition of the unique root exudates from each plant. Thus, plants mostly attract those microorganisms that are beneficial to plants and exclude those that are potentially pathogenic. Beneficial bacterial consortia not only help to promote plant growth, these consortia also protect plants from a wide range of direct and indirect environmental stresses. Moreover, it is currently possible to engineer plant seeds to contain desired bacterial strains and thereby benefit the next generation of plants. In this way, it may no longer be necessary to deliver beneficial microbiota to each individual growing plant. As we develop a better understanding of beneficial bacterial microbiomes, it may become possible to develop synthetic microbiomes where compatible bacteria work together to facilitate plant growth under a wide range of natural conditions. Keywords: soil bacteria; plant growth-promoting bacteria; PGPB; seed microbiomes; root micro- Citation: Glick, B.R.; Gamalero, E. -
"Plant Microbiome Identification and Characterization". In: Current
Plant Microbiome Identification and Characterization Sarah L. Lebeis1 1Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee To fully exploit the potential of plant microbiome alterations to improve plant health, reliable methods must be used to prepare and characterize microbiome samples. The power of culture-independent studies is that they allow the charac- terization of novel microbial community members, but only microbial members consistently represented between different research groups are likely to become broadly applicable treatments. The identification of plant microbiome mem- bers can be affected by several experimental stages, including design, sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, sequencing, and analysis. The protocols described here therefore aim to highlight crucial steps that experimenters should consider before beginning a plant microbiome study. C 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Keywords: epiphyte r endophyte r plant microbiomes r phyllosphere r rhizosphere How to cite this article: Lebeis, S. L. (2017). Plant microbiome identification and characterization. Current Protocols in Plant Biology, 2, 135–146. doi: 10.1002/cppb.20048 INTRODUCTION As with any type of scientific research, it is imperative to develop clearly defined hy- potheses and experimental procedures to yield supporting or refuting data. The most common first set of studies to characterize a plant microbiome is amplicon sequencing of phylogenetically informative marker genes, such as bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal RNA (Caporaso et al., 2012), eukaryotic 18S rRNA (Stoeck et al., 2010), and the fungal intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS; Menkis et al., 2012). Without clear predictions, results are merely descriptive, which is especially dangerous when the phenotypes are inherently complex, such as clusters of sequences into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and their relative abundances.