Technical Report 2003/01 March 2003 D R Cox, W L Peirson and J L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical Report 2003/01 March 2003 D R Cox, W L Peirson and J L HAWKESBURY NEPEAN ESTUARY SALINE DYNAMICS MODEL CALIBRATION by D R Cox, W L Peirson and J L Davies Technical Report 2003/01 March 2003 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WATER RESEARCH LABORATORY HAWKESBURY NEPEAN ESTUARY SALINE DYNAMICS MODEL CALIBRATION WRL Technical Report 2003/01 March 2003 by D R Cox, W L Peirson and J L Davies https://doi.org/10.4225/53/58d4a604e8ea6 Water Research Laboratory School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Technical Report No 2003/01 University of New South Wales ABN 57 195 873 179 Report Status Final King Street Date of Issue March 2003 Manly Vale NSW 2093 Australia Telephone: +61 (2) 9949 4488 WRL Project No. 02107 Facsimile: +61 (2) 9949 4188 Project Manager D R Cox Title Hawkesbury Nepean River Saline Dynamics – Model Calibration Author(s) D R Cox, W L Peirson and J L Davies Client Name Hawkesbury Nepean River Management Forum Client Address PO Box 556, Windsor NSW 2756 Client Contact Brian Walters Client Reference The work reported herein was carried out at the Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, acting on behalf of the client. Information published in this report is available for general release only with permission of the Director, Water Research Laboratory, and the client. WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2003/01 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. BACKGROUND 2 2.1 Environmental Flows 2 2.2 The Hawkesbury Nepean River 2 2.2.1 General Characteristics 2 2.2.2 Modifications to the Natural Flow Regime 3 3. NUMERICAL MODELLING 4 3.1 Estuary Model Description 4 3.2 Hydrodynamic Model Calibration 4 3.3 Salinity Model Calibration 7 4. CONCLUSIONS 10 5. REFERENCES 11 - i - WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2003/01 LIST OF TABLES 1. Summary of Tide Level and Discharge Calibration Data 2. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Prisms, 30 April 1981 3. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Prisms, 29 May 1981 4. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Prisms, 26 June 1981 5. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Prisms, 20 August 1981 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Hawkesbury Nepean River System 2. Hawkesbury Nepean Estuary Model Mesh 3. Location of Tidal Calibration Data 4. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tide Levels, 30 April 1981 5. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tide Levels, 29 May 1981 6. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tide Levels, 26 June 1981 7. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tide Levels, 20 August 1981 8. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Lags, 30 April 1981 9. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Lags, 29 May 1981 10. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Lags, 26 June 1981 11. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Tidal Lags, 20 August 1981 12. Major River Inflows to Hawkesbury Nepean, February 1977 – January 1978 13. Comparison of Measured and Modelled Depth Averaged Salinity, Feb 1977 – Jan 1978 - ii - WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2003/01 1. 1. INTRODUCTION The University of New South Wales, Water Research Laboratory (WRL) was commissioned by the Hawkesbury Nepean River Management Forum to establish a model of the estuary which was suitable for long term studies of salinity, environmental flows, water quality and associated ecological impacts. This report describes the development of the model and its calibration against measured tide levels, tidal discharges and longitudinal salinity structure in the Hawkesbury Nepean estuary. The one dimensional hydrodynamic and water quality model extends from West Head, at the junction of the Hawkesbury Nepean with Brisbane Water and Pittwater, to the upstream tidal limit at Yarramundi. Tide level and tidal flow data obtained by MHL (1988) during four one-day gauging exercises on the Hawkesbury River during 1981 were used to calibrate the hydrodynamic model. The salinity model was calibrated against depth- averaged salinities obtained along the length of the Hawkesbury River by the Electricity Commission at approximately 2 weekly intervals between February 1977 and January 1978. WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2003/01 2. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Environmental Flows Many estuaries in Australia are subject to irregular and non-seasonal rainfall patterns, in which long periods of low rainfall may be followed by significant rainfall events at varying intervals. As a result, the natural estuarine salinity structure may also be highly variable. During periods of high rainfall, salt water is flushed from the estuary by the increased freshwater flow, while during periods of low rainfall, saline water from the estuary mouth is able to penetrate further up the estuary, either as a density current or through tidal mixing (Dyer, 1997). Human activities have greatly modified the freshwater flow regime in many Australian rivers. Any flow storage or diversion structure that alters the amount of freshwater flow to a river system may influence the health of downstream aquatic ecosystems. Examples of anthropogenic influences on river flows include the construction of dams and weirs, withdrawal of water for household use, irrigation or industry, sewage treatment plant discharges, changes to the river channel and catchment modifications affecting runoff (such as land clearing and introduction of impervious surfaces such as roads, rooves and paving). These activities may cause persistent changes to the natural salinity structure of an estuary and consequently have implications for the health of aquatic ecosystems. Consideration of the ecological impacts of reduced river flows due to human water usage has led to the concept of “Environmental Flows”. The term “Environmental Flows” describes freshwater flow (typically instream flow) that is maintained solely for environmental reasons, to maintain the health and biodiversity of a particular water-related entity, such as a river or estuary (Peirson et al., 2001, 2002). Environmental flows are essential to the minimisation of negative influences on the health of aquatic ecosystems resulting from human alterations to the flow regime. 2.2 The Hawkesbury Nepean River 2.2.1 General Characteristics The Hawkesbury Nepean estuary (Figure 1) is an example of a tide-dominated, drowned valley estuary (Roy et al., 2001). The river is approximately 300km long and supplies 98% of Sydney’s potable water supply. The limit of saline intrusion (> 0.5 ppt) in the estuary is WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2003/01 3. usually in the vicinity of the Colo River junction but may move as far upstream as Sackville (SPCC, 1983). 2.2.2 Modifications to the Natural Flow Regime The freshwater flow and hydraulic characteristics of the Hawkesbury Nepean River have been heavily modified by the construction of dams, weirs and other water supply structures in the upper parts of the catchment, and to a lesser extent, the use of water for irrigation and returns to the river from sewage treatment plants. Dams and other major water supply structures impacting on flows in the Hawkesbury-Nepean include: • The Upper Nepean Scheme (a system of weirs, canals, tunnels and aqueducts constructed from the 1860s onwards to divert flows from the Upper Nepean to Sydney, with storage in Prospect Reservoir following its completion in 1888) • Cataract Dam (completed 1907) • Cordeaux Dam (1926) • Avon Dam (1927) • Nepean Dam (1935) • Warragamba Dam (1960) • Six dams constructed between 1907 and 1942 on tributaries of the Grose River, including Lake Medlow, Greaves Creek Dam, the Upper, Middle and Lower Cascade Dams, and Woodford Dam. These dams now serve only the middle and upper reaches of the Blue Mountains, from Faulconbridge to Mt. Victoria. The Shoalhaven Scheme (completed in 1977) allows transfer of water from the Shoalhaven River to the Wingecarribee Reservoir during times of drought, which can then be directed to either Lake Burragorang or Nepean Dam. Water can also be supplied to the Illawarra from Avon Dam and Nepean Dam. Water is extracted for irrigation purposes at numerous locations, the largest volumes of which are taken from the river between the Grose River and Colo River junctions. WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2003/01 4. 3. NUMERICAL MODELLING 3.1 Estuary Model Description The hydrodynamics and salinity distribution in the Hawkesbury Nepean estuary have been simulated using RMA-2 and RMA-11, both components of the RMA finite element modelling suite. A similar approach was applied to that previously used for salinity studies of the Richmond River by Peirson et al. (1999). Both RMA-2 and RMA-11 were configured using the same one-dimensional mesh, which extends upstream to the tidal limit at Yarramundi, just upstream of the confluence of the Grose and Nepean Rivers (Figure 2). The mesh includes the tidal sections of the other major tributaries of the Hawkesbury River downstream of this point, namely the Colo River, Macdonald River, Mangrove Creek, Berowra Creek, Mooney Mooney Creek, Mullet Creek and Cowan Creek. At its downstream end, the mesh extends to a line between the eastern sides of Middle Head and West Head, at the junction of the Hawkesbury Nepean estuary with Brisbane Water and Pittwater. 3.2 Hydrodynamic Model Calibration Tidal currents and freshwater inflows to the Hawkesbury Nepean estuary were simulated using the hydrodynamic model RMA-2 (King, 1998). An ocean tidal boundary condition was applied at the downstream end of the model and the major freshwater inflows to the system. Streamflow data for the Nepean River at Penrith, the Colo River and Macdonald River were used to define the freshwater inflow at the upstream limits of the model. Gauged flow data was not available for the Grose River for the period of the hydrodynamic model calibration, and HSPF modelled catchment flows from a study by SMEC (2002a, b) were used to define the freshwater input from this source. It would not be expected that smaller sources of freshwater inflow would have much impact on the tidal calibration. Tide level and tidal flow data obtained by MHL (1988) during four one-day gauging exercises on the Hawkesbury River, between April and August 1981, were used to calibrate the hydrodynamic model.
Recommended publications
  • Professionals Australia's Response on Behalf of Members in Relation to The
    Professionals Australia’s response on behalf of members in relation to the proposed restructure PA met with engineers who work in the Engineering Division on two occasions at WNSW Parramatta offices with members dialling-in from regional NSW. PA encouraged members to put forward their professional views on the proposed restructure on whether it addressed existing problems. PA has received some very detailed responses from our members. It is clear there is a high level of concern that the restructure will have undesired impacts on both employees and the functions of Engineering. Many members have taken the opportunity to respond directly to the WNSW email address set up for feedback. This submission does not repeat those comments. This submission is concerned with the first order issue – Does the restructure enhance the undertaking of engineering functions by WaterNSW or not? The next level of concerns which appear to be the main focus of the input provided via the WNSW email are the detail of position descriptions and the arrangements for filling the structure. We understand such matters have also attracted a large number of comments and concerns from members. However, those issues arise only when the first order issue is satisfied. The focus of this submission is whether the restructure has accurately identified the deficiencies and whether the proposal will address those deficiencies. What can a restructure address? A restructure can address issues such as resourcing levels, specific function focus and functional alignment. It cannot address issues caused by dysfunctional organisational behaviour, lack of effective processes, etc. Does the restructure enhance engineering functions at WNSW? The view of WNSW engineers is that overall the restructure will not result in the enhanced performance of the engineering functions required by WNSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Crosslands to Berowra Waters Return
    Crosslands to Berowra Waters return 6 hrs Hard track 4 13.7 km Return 1005m This return walk starts from the Crosslands Reserve and follows the Great North Walk along Berowra creek. The walk includes some boardwalks. After climbing up the side of the valley, the walk comes back down into Berowra Waters. Here you can enjoy lunch by Berowra Creek, at the Garden House restaurant, or catch the free car-ferry across the river to find the fish cafe. 178m 1m Berowra Valley National Park Maps, text & images are copyright wildwalks.com | Thanks to OSM, NASA and others for data used to generate some map layers. Crosslands Before You walk Grade Crosslands Reserve is lovely and long mixed use picnic area, Bushwalking is fun and a wonderful way to enjoy our natural places. This walk has been graded using the AS 2156.1-2001. The overall spanning along the edge of Berowra Creek. There are picnic tables, Sometimes things go bad, with a bit of planning you can increase grade of the walk is dertermined by the highest classification along electric barbecues, toilets, car parking, a children's playground, your chance of having an ejoyable and safer walk. the whole track. garbage bins, camping area, toilets and town water. The southern Before setting off on your walk check part of Crosslands is managed by Hornsby Council and the northern half by the NPWS within the Berowra Valley National Park. The 1) Weather Forecast (BOM Metropolitan District) 4 Grade 4/6 first inhabitants of this area were a subgroup of the Dharug people 2) Fire Dangers (Greater Sydney Region) Hard track who enjoyed the sandstone caves, fish and abundant plant life in the 3) Park Alerts (Berowra Valley National Park) area.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Water in 1788 Was the Little Stream That Wound Its Way from Near a Day Tour of the Water Supply Hyde Park Through the Centre of the Town Into Sydney Cove
    In the beginning Sydney’s first water supply from the time of its settlement Sydney Water in 1788 was the little stream that wound its way from near A day tour of the water supply Hyde Park through the centre of the town into Sydney Cove. It became known as the Tank Stream. By 1811 it dams south of Sydney was hardly fit for drinking. Water was then drawn from wells or carted from a creek running into Rushcutter’s Bay. The Tank Stream was still the main water supply until 1826. In this whole-day tour by car you will see the major dams, canals and pipelines that provide water to Sydney. Some of these works still in use were built around 1880. The round trip tour from Sydney is around 350 km., all on good roads and motorway. The tour is through attractive countryside south Engines at Botany Pumping Station (demolished) of Sydney, and there are good picnic areas and playgrounds at the dam sites. source of supply. In 1854 work started on the Botany Swamps Scheme, which began to deliver water in 1858. The Scheme included a series of dams feeding a pumping station near the present Sydney Airport. A few fragments of the pumping station building remain and can be seen Tank stream in 1840, from a water-colour by beside General Holmes Drive. Water was pumped to two J. Skinner Prout reservoirs, at Crown Street (still in use) and Paddington (not in use though its remains still exist). The ponds known as Lachlan Swamp (now Centennial Park) only 3 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Output Chunks
    MooneyMooney MooneyMooney CreekCreek TrackheadTrackhead toto SomersbySomersby This enjoyable walk starts from where the old Length: 16.1 km Pacific Hwy where you walk along dirt roads and trails for while alongside the wide Mooney Time: 6 hrs Mooney Creek, and under the huge F3 Mooney Climb: 680 m Mooney bridge. The wide track continues upstream, passing a few campsites before crossing Style: One way the wide creek at a pleasant large rock platform. Rating: Track: Hard Not too long after crossing the creek you will pass the lower Mooney Mooney Dam where the old Where: 9.1 km W of Gosford trail leads you uphill past another campsite, a Transport: car bus quarry to the Somersby Reservoir. The track then leads past some rural properties and across the Visit www.wildwalks.com for more info delightful Robinson Creek among the Gymea Lilies before finishing with a section of road walking to the Somersby Store. Brisbane Water National Park Side trips and Alternate routes mentioned in these notes are not included in the tracks overall rating, distance or time estimate. The notes only describe the side trips and Alternate routes in one direction. Allow extra time for resting and exploring areas of interest. Please ensure you and your group are well prepared and equipped for all possible hazards and delays. The authors, staff and owners of wildwalks take care in preparing these notes but will not accept responsibility for any inconvenience, loss or injury sustained by using these notes or maps. Please take care and share your experience through the website.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2014 “Nature Conservation Saves for Tomorrow”
    Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc. Issue No. 317 HUT NEWS August 2014 “Nature Conservation Saves for Tomorrow” Blue Mountains Conservation Society presents Blue Mountains Wild River ... The Wollangambe Sunday 17th August, 2pm Wentworth Falls School of Arts (Cnr Great Western Highway and Adele Avenue) The Wollangambe River is just to the north of Mt. Wilson and for most of its 57km length it is within the World Heritage Blue Mountains and Wollemi National Parks, and the Wollemi Wilderness. Our August meeting is about the beauty of this river and the beast that threatens it. Andy Macqueen will talk about the river from an historical and geographical perspective. Dr Ian Wright and Nakia Belmer will provide a “state of health” of the river. And all of this will be accompanied by glorious images from Ian Brown and Society members. Read more on page 5. Visitors are very welcome. Photos: Wild River gorge, by Ian Brown; Ian Wright take samples to test the health of the river, by Nakia Belmer. BMCS NURSERY PLANT SALES Threatened Species Day Yabbies on the menu! Lawson Nursery, Wednesday Threatened Species Day, 7th September, The Little Pied Cormorant is a and Saturday mornings, 9am to commemorates the death of the last regular visitor to the duck pond in noon. Thylacine (Tasmanian tiger - Thylacinus the Blackheath Memorial Park. The nursery is located in the cynocephalus) at Hobart Zoo in 1936. He rests on one of his favourite Lawson Industrial Area on the Events are held nationally throughout rocks. corner of Park and Cascade September - Biodiversity Month. Streets, opposite Federation Changes to the landscape and native Building Materials - see map on our website habitat as a result of human activity have www.bluemountains.org.au).
    [Show full text]
  • The Millstone
    The Millstone July – August 2013 www.kurrajonghistory.org.au ISSN 2201-0920 Vol 11 Issue 4 July – August 2013 THE MILLSTONE KURRAJONG ~ COMLEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY The Kurrajong ~ Comleroy Historical Society is dedicated to researching, recording, preserving and promoting the growth of interest in the history of the Kurrajong district, the area west of the Hawkesbury River bounded by Bilpin and the Grose and Colo rivers THIS ISSUE Colo River tour 2 Four sumpter horses CAROLYNNE COOPER John Low OAM was the guest speaker at the general meeting held wenty people had booked to go on our tour to Colo on April 9 led by Wanda on 27 May. His talk covered the 1813 Deacon. We drove down Comleroy Road to the Upper Colo church where we crossing of the Blue Mountains with Twere given an informative tour, Powerpoint presentation and morning tea before an emphasis on the role played heading off on an adventure of a lifetime. by the four sumpter horses and It is difficult to say when the Colo River was first discovered as white settlers had how horses played a pivotal role in been living on the banks of the Colo River since the early 1800s with the first land most of the expeditions of the early grants being made in 1804. Initially it was called the second branch of the Hawkes- colony. bury River. William Parr on his way northward in 1817 wrote notes on the Colo as did Benjamin Singleton six months later, then John Howe went on an expedition to the 4 The Darkiñung Abstract Hunter in 1819 passing through the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraction of Sand from the Colo River and Processing of Sand on Portion 37, Lower Colo Road, Colo
    .. ";0Cl4 ~ /,blf/(' Report to the Honourable Bob Carr Minister for Planning and Environment An Inquiry pursuant to Section 119 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, into a development application EXTRACTION OF SAND FROM THE COLO RIVER AND PROCESSING OF SAND ON PORTION 37, LOWER COLO ROAD, COLO John Woodward, Chairman COMMISSIONER OF INQUIRY September 1985 f \, F i i S Y D N E Y ,:j it September 1985 ( !'. 1, . TO MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT j \ On 18th January 1985, you directed that an inquiry be ,I. '/ held in accordance with Section 119 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, by a Commission of Inquiry ( with respect to a development application to dredge sand from the Colo River adjacent to portion 37, Lower Colo, in the Shire of Hawkesbury. You commissioned me to conduct ) the inquiry into the proposed development and to report \., my findings and recommendations to you . The public inquiry was held at Sydney commencing on 30th July, 1985. During the course of the inquiry adjournments were granted to allow certain parties further time to prepare their submissions to the inquiry. Field visits were conducted in the presence of the parties to the proposed dredging site on the Colo River, to adjoin­ ing lands and to nearby properties held by obj ectors to the development and to other vantage points in the area. The public sessions of the inquiry concluded on 14th August 1985. This report is made to you pursuant to the provisions of the Act and sets ")tit my findings and recommendations on the issues raised ,during the course of the inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornsby Shire Council
    HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL BEROWRA CREEK ESTUARY MANAGEMENT STUDY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2000 HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL BEROWRA CREEK ESTUARY MANAGEMENT STUDY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2000 Webb, McKeown & Associates Pty Ltd Prepared by: ___________________________ Level 2, 160 Clarence Street, SYDNEY 2000 Telephone: (02) 9299 2855 Facsimile: (02) 9262 6208 Verified by: ____________________________ 98122:BerowraEMSWord:M6 BEROWRA CREEK ESTUARY MANAGEMENT STUDY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN i to xxvii 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 1.1. This Management Study............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. The Estuary Management Program.......................................................................................... 1 1.3. The Wider Planning Management Context.............................................................................. 2 1.4. Statement of Joint Intent............................................................................................................ 2 1.5. Community Consultation ........................................................................................................... 4 2. FEATURES OF THE STUDY AREA ....................................................................................6 2.1. Catchment...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bielany Flyer.Pub
    HOW TO GET TO BIELANY Bielany is located in the COLO RIVER VALLEY 28 km North of Windsor 3 km west of the Putty Road. Bielany Borders with the Wollemi National Park BIELANY Polish Foundation of NSW Polish Community Recreational Reserve To get to Bielany, first travel to Windsor then take the Putty Road through Wilberforce heading towards Singleton. About 25km out of Windsor, turn left just before the Colo River Bridge and then turn left onto Upper Colo Road. Keep following the road around, you must go over 2 bridges and you will find BIELANY the gates to Bielany on your right 213 Upper Colo Road hand side, straight after the Colo NSW 2756 second creek bridge. Phone: (02) 4575-5311 What to do at Bielany Advice for visitors to Bielany BIELANY • Swimming, Canoeing and Kayaking • Remember that Bielany is a wilderness area, we all Polish Foundation of NSW • Bushwalking and Bird Watching wish to keep it that way. • Fishing Bielany is a 40 acre Semi Wilderness • Volleyball, Badminton and Table Tennis • Take care when picnicking and camping, beware of recreational, picnic and camping • 4WD tracks close by falling branches and other hazards. ground. • Good old fashioned relaxation Bielany is located on the Banks of • Please take your rubbish with you. (council does NOT pick up our rubbish). the picturesque Colo River, approxi- mately 80km north west of Sydney. • Keep your dogs on a leash. It was established and is managed by the Polish Community of Sydney, through the Polish • Respect the peace and privacy of others. Foundation in NSW Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobby's Outreach
    HOBBY'S OUTREACH Newsletter ef: BLUE MOUNTAINS HISTORICAL SOCIETY Inc. ISSN 1835-3010 P 0Box17, WENT\VORTH FAILS NSW 2782 Telephone: (02) 4757 3824 Hobby's Reach, 99 Blaxland Road, Wentworth Falls, NSW Email: [email protected] !Volume 20 Number3 August - September 20081 5 APRIL 2008 MEETING Contributed lry Colin Slade Continued from June-July issue The Garden Palace and The International Exhibition Sydney 1879 ,,,,":(a, -i-e-c-e-14~ 'f 111-i:J,'l"fll, !""""""'"" ,.,,1,7(e-~ During the first three days of the Exhibition some eighteen thousand visitors (excluding exhibitors and officials) passed -.... through the gates and an uneasy doubt was felt among the Commissioners as to the popular appeal of the Show. But Saturday 27 September, the first 'Shilling Day', banished all apprehension as 30,000 visitors crowded the Garden Palace and applauded a repeat performance of the Exhibition Cantata and the Hallelujah Chorus. The Sydney tram system owes its origins to the Exhibition. The first tram lines were laid from the nearest railway station at Redfern to Hunter Street to bring visitors in a double-decked carriage driven by a newly built steam tram. After the Exhibition this tram line was doubled all the way and extended to the eastern, southern and western suburbs. Among the many exhibits, only to name but a few from all over the world, included a Turkish Bazaar, Japanese Tea House, 116 samples of tea from different countries, Emerson's Oyster Saloon, a Maori House, Austro-Hungarian Wme and Beer Tasting Hall. A Fijian house, for a time inhabited by dancing natives claiming to have been cannibals, The Australian Dairy (a glass of fresh, cold milk for a penny), 20 kingdoms, republics and colonies were represented.
    [Show full text]
  • Including the Upper Nepean Scheme), at Which Time It Was Used Only to Flush Creeks and Ponds 14 in the Botanic Gardens.13F13F
    by 1890 (including the Upper Nepean Scheme), at which time it was used only to flush creeks and ponds 14 in the Botanic Gardens.13F13F FIGURE 6: WOOLCOTT & CLARKE’S MAP OF THE CITY OF SYDNEY, 1864 (SOURCE: HISTORICAL ATLAS OF SYDNEY) FIGURE 7: BUSBY’S BORE ACROSS HYDE PARK, FINAL FLOW OF WATER ACROSS TRESTLES, TO BE COLLECTED AND DISTRIBUTED BY HORSE DRAWN CART (SOURCE: CITY OF SYDNEY ARCHIVES, CALL NUMBER: SSV1 / WAT) 14 ibid Archaeological Assessment—Sydney Football Stadium Prepared by Curio Projects for Infrastructure NSW 25 FIGURE 8: SECTION OF BUSBY’S BORE NEAR INTERSECTION OF LIVERPOOL AND COLLEGE STREETS, THIS SECTION OF THE BORE WAS CONSTRUCTED AS AN OPEN CUT TRENCH, LAID WITH SANDSTONE MASONRY AND SLAB ROOF (SOURCE: SYDNEY WATER ARCHIVES, REF: A1029) FIGURE 9: BUSBY’S BORE ACCESS POINT AT VICTORIA BARRACKS, PADDINGTON (SOURCE: CITY OF SYDNEY ARCHIVES, FILE. 029\029322) Archaeological Assessment—Sydney Football Stadium Prepared by Curio Projects for Infrastructure NSW 26 FIGURE 10: ORIGINAL 1892 PLAN OF BUSBY’S BORE (N.B. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PROVEN TO HAVE MANY LOCATIONAL INACCURACIES) (SOURCE: SYDNEY WATER ARCHIVES, REF: A1029) 3.4. Rifle Range and Moore Park Following the establishment and completion of construction of the Victoria Park Barracks, it became apparent that additional land was required for both a rifle range, as well as recreational facilities for the troops. Thus in 1849, additional land from the Sydney Common was set aside for a professional military rifle range (Figure 11), followed in 1852 by an additional 25 acres for a ‘military garden and cricket 15 ground’14F14F (the location of which eventually became the Sydney Cricket Ground).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Blue Mountains Waterways Health Report
    BMCC-WaterwaysReport-0818.qxp_Layout 1 21/8/18 4:06 pm Page 1 Blue Mountains Waterways Health Report 2017 the city within a World Heritage National Park Full report in support of the 2017 Health Snapshot BMCC-WaterwaysReport-0818.qxp_Layout 1 21/8/18 4:06 pm Page 2 Publication information and acknowledgements: The City of the Blue Mountains is located within the Country of the Darug and Gundungurra peoples. The Blue Mountains City Council recognises that Darug and Gundungurra Traditional Owners have a continuous and deep connection to their Country and that this is of great cultural significance to Aboriginal people, both locally and in the region. For Darug and Gundungurra People, Ngurra (Country) takes in everything within the physical, cultural and spiritual landscape—landforms, waters, air, trees, rocks, plants, animals, foods, medicines, minerals, stories and special places. It includes cultural practice, kinship, knowledge, songs, stories and art, as well as spiritual beings, and people: past, present and future. Blue Mountains City Council pays respect to Elders past and present, while recognising the strength, capacity and resilience of past and present Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Blue Mountains region. Report: Prepared by Blue Mountains City Council’s Healthy Waterways team (Environment and Culture Branch) – Amy St Lawrence, Alice Blackwood, Emma Kennedy, Jenny Hill and Geoffrey Smith. Date: 2017 Fieldwork (2016): Christina Day, Amy St Lawrence, Cecil Ellis. Identification of macroinvertebrate samples (2016 samples): Amy St Lawrence, Christina Day, Cecil Ellis, Chris Madden (Freshwater Macroinvertebrates) Scientific Licences: Office of Environment & Heritage (NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service) Scientific Licence number SL101530.
    [Show full text]