Ledene a Saxon Estate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ledene a Saxon Estate Ledene a Saxon Estate YLn Investigation of the Leacfon o/a[e ancf tfte !forest of f})ean Jt[an Sfie[[ey Highleadon History Series Volume 6 Preface Harold Godwinson is King Edward the Atheling1 defended his home, land and people, until suddenly came death and bitter, and took the dear one, the atheling from the earth; the angels accompanied him, his soul strong in truth, into the sky's light. The wise one therefore committed the kingdom to one high in rank, Harold himself, noble earl, who at all times faithfully obeyed his lord in words and deeds, holding back nothing 2 at the need of the king of the people • The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle This is the sixth volume in a series of information about the history of Highleadon 3 and its surrounds • It forms a part of a progressive research. This information was gathered during September 2004 © Alan Shelley BA DLA FSTD FRSA, Wycken End Cheltenham, Sept. 2004 1 Edward the Confessor son of Ethelred (Atheling, meaning birthright to the throne) 2 See table of the 'English' kings at the rear of this composition. 3 It is worthy of note that when Edward had set up his court in 1051 at Kingsholm, Gloucestershire had become an area of great desire to Godwin, and Harold in particular, as they collected more land and greater powers over the dominiom. Contents Chapter Page i. Introduction i. 1. Ledene (background, argument & debate) 1. 2. Summary 4. 3. Investigation of Ledene an Anglo-Saxon estate 5. APPENDICES 4. Anglo-Saxon Gloucestershire 10. 5. NOTES 12. 6. Conclusion 13. ILLUSTRATIONS i. Upleadon 14. ii. The Church at Upleadon 15. iii. 'Middleton', Upleadon 16. iv. Relics at Highleadon 17. MAP1. 'The Forest' at Domesday 18. MAP II. Dean Forest, 1228 and 1282 19. TABLE Kings of Wessex and England, before 1066 20. POSTSCRIPTS 1P. The Norman Conquest 21. 2P. The Influence of Danish & Norman Dominion 31. 3P. William Fitz-Norman's Castle at Taynton 33. MAPA The Village of Taynton 35. MAPB. The Old Village and Castle Grounds 36. MAP C. Taynton Tithe Map of 1840 37. Introduction This pamphlet is a compilation of notes intending to explore the origins of the rustic hamlet named Highleadon and to discover its relationship with the Leadon Vale. The investigation has also led me to consider the possibility that the name Ledene may have influenced the title of the 'Forest' that was later officially named the 'Forest of Dean'. The Anglo-Saxons did much to shape our present English landscape. Roman roads and ancient trackways provided the rudiments of the infrastructure adopted, and developed upon, by the Saxons. Our language has been developed from Anglo-Saxon origins. The majority of our towns and villages were originated and named during that period. Unfortunately, only very few written documents survive to describe the Leadon Vale, of those times. However, the Saxons employed a simple method of naming places, that provide us with a lasting descriptive meaning. Macro-etymology* of place names allows us to look back at the original meaning of these names. A title given to a settlement or estate would often represent features of its location. An example is with names ending in 'ton', these are mostly based on the Saxon word tun meaning farmstead. Often the prefix is representative of the founding owner or leader. Sometimes the name concludes with ... ing and this gives meaning to 'the people of' (a place or leader) e.g. Reading. Names ending ... ington would refer to the 'tun of the people of ... '. The word 'dene' is accepted as an old English word for valley. It is descended from denu, the Anglo-Saxon word for dene or dean. Where the word 'dean' is applied to the Church, it has a different origin. Derived from the Latin decanus meaning a 'monk set over ten other monks'. Dean has been applied, in modern times, to 'Deaneries' of anywhere from six to sixty parishes as an administrative overhead. Finally the word should not be confused with the origins of 'don' which was given to refer to a hill fort. It is true to say that little importance was given, by the Saxons, to forested areas. They were more inclined to live outside, or to remove most of the woodland and adapt the land for agriculture. The Saxon population of the Leadon Vale, never highly populated, would have become considerably reduced by famine, prevalent in the early eleventh century, and by the results of bitter dynastic competition. As little recorded information exists of the area, for the period before Domesday, some opinions/ conclusions may rely upon conjecture. In 1066, following the death of King Edward and the dynastic battles at Fulford Gate, Stamford Bridge and finally at Hastings resulted in the Norman Conquest and a change of government over England that had a direct affect upon the people of the Severn Vale. Thegns of the Severn and the Leadon Vales would have by Saxon tradition have joined their Earls, Edwin of Mercia and his brother Morcar at Fulford Gate where large numbers were destroyed. Most of their lands were eventually confiscated by the Normans, including those of the Leadon Vale. The outcome, undoubtedly, forced immediate changes, if not the complete destruction, of their Saxon estates. After the Conquest, the agricultural lands of the Leadon Vale were granted, in the main, to the monastery at Gloucester and remained 'church property' for more than four-hundred years. When the lands were distributed, following the Dissolution in 1541, the manors and estates took on a new independence that may have hidden, or modified our suppositions with regard to an earlier history of the Leadon Vale. Concentration, during the Middle Ages, was directed upon the new town of Newent, that dominates the Vale today. *Breakdown of word formation (an account of sense-development). 1 Ledene About five and a half miles north-west of Gloucester are the rural communities of Upleadon and Highleadon. They are in the valley of the river Leadon and from which they have been widely assumed to have gained their titles. Such assumptions would be wrong! Today, Upleadon is a broadly scattered village and the adjacent Highleadon is a small hamlet attributed to the parish of Rudford. In Saxon times, there existed an estate known as Ledene, which included these settlements. By the time of the Domesday survey, some eighteen years after the Norman Conquest, the old estate had been broken up and mostly transferred to the property of the monastery of St Peter's at Gloucester. It will be the purpose of this dissertation to bring to life the origins of the manor, and its wider estate, in Saxon times. This also leads one to speculate over its possible importance and influence on the surrounding area. As very little is known of the occupants and their administration during the Saxon period, much may be conjecture, based upon subsequent historical facts, references and potential connections. Before examining the evidence, it will be necessary to remind ourselves of the period, its historical background and the landscape of those early times. The nearby city of Gloucester had been established by the Romans and was among the four principal (and garrison) towns of England. The immediate locality was inhabited by the Celtic British tribe of the Dobunni. These were people who had developed, initially from the red haired tribes of Swiss and German origins and later intermixed with the Belgic invaders during the first century BC. It was a loosely unified kingdom (ruled by the Romans) stretching from northern Somerset to the southern half of Worcestershire and including the whole of Gloucestershire east of the Severn. To the west of the Severn was forest, all the way up to Hereford. The woodland was steadily denser toward the area now the heart of the Forest of Dean. A tribe of British Celts known as the Silures, who were hardy hill-men, had settled into Wales and parts of the Forest. It is important to remember that the forest had no specific title until several centuries later. The Silures were of a hostile nature, [unlike the Dobunni] they fought the Romans and were not inclined towards domestic harmony. Iron being mined from the Forest, formed an important part of the local economy and paid the taxes for the city of Gloucester. The Forest was generally an inhospitable place and also harboured fugitives, small bands of immigrants and outlaws. The Silures were eventually quelled when Caradoc, their leader was defeated in a skirmish in AD 50. A few wealthy Romans cleared areas of the forest and established villa estates. During the Roman period, Christianity was established in England and became largely understood by the majority. Following the end of the Roman civilisation in around 450 AD, the villas and towns fell into decay. A steady influx of Saxons had been arriving and moving across the country. They came from Angeln, Denmark, Jutland, northern Germany and Fresia. The Romans had dubbed them all with the title of Saxon. They were of a common ancestry and strongly influenced the eventual culture of Britain. The current thinking of historians is that they were less an invading force and more of an immigrating people that assimilated with the indigenous British who by intermarriage and association became, in time, a Saxon society. It seems that Saxon leaders commanded strengths that opposed typical British tribal resentments. In 577, a force of West Saxons killed three British kings in a battle at Dyrham and formally took over the control of Gloucester, Cirencester and Bath. The region then became a part of 1 the Kingdom of Mercia and the locality was peopled by a Saxon dominated tribe called the Hwicce.
Recommended publications
  • Gloucestershire Castles
    Gloucestershire Archives Take One Castle Gloucestershire Castles The first castles in Gloucestershire were built soon after the Norman invasion of 1066. After the Battle of Hastings, the Normans had an urgent need to consolidate the land they had conquered and at the same time provide a secure political and military base to control the country. Castles were an ideal way to do this as not only did they secure newly won lands in military terms (acting as bases for troops and supply bases), they also served as a visible reminder to the local population of the ever-present power and threat of force of their new overlords. Early castles were usually one of three types; a ringwork, a motte or a motte & bailey; A Ringwork was a simple oval or circular earthwork formed of a ditch and bank. A motte was an artificially raised earthwork (made by piling up turf and soil) with a flat top on which was built a wooden tower or ‘keep’ and a protective palisade. A motte & bailey was a combination of a motte with a bailey or walled enclosure that usually but not always enclosed the motte. The keep was the strongest and securest part of a castle and was usually the main place of residence of the lord of the castle, although this changed over time. The name has a complex origin and stems from the Middle English term ‘kype’, meaning basket or cask, after the structure of the early keeps (which resembled tubes). The name ‘keep’ was only used from the 1500s onwards and the contemporary medieval term was ‘donjon’ (an apparent French corruption of the Latin dominarium) although turris, turris castri or magna turris (tower, castle tower and great tower respectively) were also used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom of Mercia and the Origins and Distribution of Common Fields*
    The Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia and the origins and distribution of common fields* by Susan Oosthuizen Abstract: This paper aims to explore the hypothesis that the agricultural layouts and organisation that had de- veloped into common fields by the high middle ages may have had their origins in the ‘long’ eighth century, between about 670 and 840 AD. It begins by reiterating the distinction between medieval open and common fields, and the problems that inhibit current explanations for their period of origin and distribution. The distribution of common fields is reviewed and the coincidence with the kingdom of Mercia noted. Evidence pointing towards an earlier date for the origin of fields is reviewed. Current views of Mercia in the ‘long’ eighth century are discussed and it is shown that the kingdom had both the cultural and economic vitality to implement far-reaching landscape organisation. The proposition that early forms of these field systems may have originated in the ‘long’ eighth century is considered, and the paper concludes with suggestions for further research. Open and common fields (a specialised form of open field) endured in the English landscape for over a thousand years and their physical remains still survive in many places. A great deal is known and understood about their distribution and physical appearance, about their man- agement from their peak in the thirteenth century through the changes of the later medieval and early modern periods, and about how and when they disappeared. Their origins, however, present a continuing problem partly, at least, because of the difficulties in extrapolating in- formation about such beginnings from documentary sources and upstanding earthworks that record – or fossilise – mature or even late field systems.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRE for ARCHAEOLOGY Centre for Archaeology Report 25/2001
    S ("-1 1<. 6?r1 36325 a ~I~ 6503 ENGLISH HERITAGE Report 25/200 I Tree-Ring Analysis of Timbers from Gunns Mills, Spout Lane, Abenhall, Near Mitcheldean, Gloucestershire RE Howard, R R Laxton and C D litton CENTRE FOR ARCHAEOLOGY Centre for Archaeology Report 25/2001 Tree-Ring Analysis of Timbers from Gunns Mills, Spout Lane, Abenhall, Near Mitcheldean, Gloucestershire R E Howard, R R Laxton & C D Litton © English Heritage 2001 ISSN 1473-9224 The Centre for Archaeology Reports Series incorporates the former Ancient Monuments LaboratOlY Report Series. Copies of Ancient Monuments LaboratolY Reports will continue to be available from the Centrefor Archaeology (see back ofcover for details). Centre for Archaeology Report 25/2001 Tree-Ring Analysis of Timbers from Gunns Mills, Spout Lane, Abenhall, Near Mitcheldean, Gloucestershire RE Howard, R R Laxton & C D Litton Summary Fifteen samples from the timber portion of this blast furnace were analysed by tree-ring dating. This analysis produced a single site chronology of nine samples, the 244 rings it contains spanning the period AD 1438 - AD 1681. Interpretation of the sapwood, and the relative positions of the heartwoodlsapwood boundaries on the dated samples, suggests that the timbers represented, all from the northern half of the timber building, were felled in late AD 1681 or early AD 1682. This felling took place as part of a reconstruction programme, known to have taken place in AD 1682 3 and does not date to the cAD 1740 conversion of the building to a paper milL Keywords Dendrochronology Standing Building Authors' address University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demo Version
    Æbucurnig Dynbær Edinburgh Coldingham c. 638 to Northumbria 8. England and Wales GODODDIN HOLY ISLAND Lindisfarne Tuidi Bebbanburg about 600 Old Melrose Ad Gefring Anglo-Saxon Kingdom NORTH CHANNEL of Northumbria BERNICIA STRATHCLYDE 633 under overlordship Buthcæster Corebricg Gyruum * of Northumbria æt Rægeheafde Mote of Mark Tyne Anglo-Saxon Kingdom Caerluel of Mercia Wear Luce Solway Firth Bay NORTHHYMBRA RICE Other Anglo-Saxon united about 604 Kingdoms Streonæshalch RHEGED Tese Cetreht British kingdoms MANAW Hefresham c 624–33 to Northumbria Rye MYRCNA Tribes DEIRA Ilecliue Eoforwic NORTH IRISH Aire Rippel ELMET Ouse SEA SEA 627 to Northumbria æt Bearwe Humbre c 627 to Northumbria Trent Ouestræfeld LINDESEGE c 624–33 to Northumbria TEGEINGL Gæignesburh Rhuddlan Mærse PEC- c 600 Dublin MÔN HOLY ISLAND Llanfaes Deganwy c 627 to Northumbria SÆTE to Mercia Lindcylene RHOS Saint Legaceaster Bangor Asaph Cair Segeint to Badecarnwiellon GWYNEDD WREOCAN- IRELAND Caernarvon SÆTE Bay DUNODING MIERCNA RICE Rapendun The Wash c 700 to Mercia * Usa NORTHFOLC Byrtun Elmham MEIRIONNYDD MYRCNA Northwic Cardigan Rochecestre Liccidfeld Stanford Walle TOMSÆTE MIDDIL Bay POWYS Medeshamstede Tamoworthig Ligoraceaster EAST ENGLA RICE Sæfern PENCERSÆTE WATLING STREET ENGLA * WALES MAGON- Theodford Llanbadarn Fawr GWERTH-MAELIENYDD Dommoceaster (?) RYNION RICE SÆTE Huntandun SUTHFOLC Hamtun c 656 to Mercia Beodericsworth CEREDIGION Weogornaceaster Bedanford Grantanbrycg BUELLT ELFAEL HECANAS Persore Tovecestre Headleage Rendlæsham Eofeshamm + Hereford c 600 GipeswicSutton Hoo EUIAS Wincelcumb to Mercia EAST PEBIDIOG ERGING Buccingahamm Sture mutha Saint Davids BRYCHEINIOG Gleawanceaster HWICCE Heorotford SEAXNA SAINT GEORGE’SSaint CHANNEL DYFED 577 to Wessex Ægelesburg * Brides GWENT 628 to Mercia Wæclingaceaster Hetfelle RICE Ythancæstir Llanddowror Waltham Bay Cirenceaster Dorchecestre GLYWYSING Caerwent Wealingaford WÆCLINGAS c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications
    The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications By Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels: a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications by Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife with contributions from J.R.L. Allen, Nigel G. Cameron, Alan J. Clapham, Rowena Gale, and Mark Robinson with an introduction by Julie Gardiner Wessex Archaeology Internet Reports Published 2010 by Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, SP4 6EB http://www.wessexarch.co.uk/ Copyright © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2010 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Contents List of Figures List of Plates List of Tables Editor’s Introduction, by Julie Gardiner .......................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION The Severn Levels ............................................................................................................................ 5 The Wentlooge Formation ............................................................................................................... 5 The Avon Levels .............................................................................................................................. 6 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 7 THE INVESTIGATIONS The research/fieldwork: methods of investigation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOREST of DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-Based Data Collection Project Number 2727
    THE FOREST OF DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-based data collection Project Number 2727 Volume 2 Appendices Jon Hoyle Gloucestershire County Council Environment Department Archaeology Service November 2008 © Archaeology Service, Gloucestershire County Council, November 2008 1 Contents Appendix A Amalgamated solid geology types 11 Appendix B Forest Enterprise historic environment management categories 13 B.i Management Categories 13 B.ii Types of monument to be assigned to each category 16 B.iii Areas where more than one management category can apply 17 Appendix C Sources systematically consulted 19 C.i Journals and periodicals and gazetteers 19 C.ii Books, documents and articles 20 C.iii Map sources 22 C.iv Sources not consulted, or not systematically searched 25 Appendix D Specifications for data collection from selected source works 29 D.i 19th Century Parish maps: 29 D.ii SMR checking by Parish 29 D.iii New data gathering by Parish 29 D.iv Types of data to be taken from Parish maps 29 D.v 1608 map of the western part of the Forest of Dean: Source Works 1 & 2919 35 D.vi Other early maps sources 35 D.vii The Victoria History of the County of Gloucester: Source Works 3710 and 894 36 D.viii Listed buildings information: 40 D.ix NMR Long Listings: Source ;Work 4249 41 D.x Coleford – The History of a West Gloucestershire Town, Hart C, 1983, Source Work 824 41 D.xi Riverine Dean, Putley J, 1999: Source Work 5944 42 D.xii Other text-based sources 42 Appendix E Specifications for checking or adding certain types of
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Parish Map
    Gloucestershire Parish Map MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT 1 Charlton Kings CP Cheltenham 91 Sevenhampton CP Cotswold 181 Frocester CP Stroud 2 Leckhampton CP Cheltenham 92 Sezincote CP Cotswold 182 Ham and Stone CP Stroud 3 Prestbury CP Cheltenham 93 Sherborne CP Cotswold 183 Hamfallow CP Stroud 4 Swindon CP Cheltenham 94 Shipton CP Cotswold 184 Hardwicke CP Stroud 5 Up Hatherley CP Cheltenham 95 Shipton Moyne CP Cotswold 185 Harescombe CP Stroud 6 Adlestrop CP Cotswold 96 Siddington CP Cotswold 186 Haresfield CP Stroud 7 Aldsworth CP Cotswold 97 Somerford Keynes CP Cotswold 187 Hillesley and Tresham CP Stroud 112 75 8 Ampney Crucis CP Cotswold 98 South Cerney CP Cotswold 188 Hinton CP Stroud 9 Ampney St. Mary CP Cotswold 99 Southrop CP Cotswold 189 Horsley CP Stroud 10 Ampney St. Peter CP Cotswold 100 Stow-on-the-Wold CP Cotswold 190 King's Stanley CP Stroud 13 11 Andoversford CP Cotswold 101 Swell CP Cotswold 191 Kingswood CP Stroud 12 Ashley CP Cotswold 102 Syde CP Cotswold 192 Leonard Stanley CP Stroud 13 Aston Subedge CP Cotswold 103 Temple Guiting CP Cotswold 193 Longney and Epney CP Stroud 89 111 53 14 Avening CP Cotswold 104 Tetbury CP Cotswold 194 Minchinhampton CP Stroud 116 15 Bagendon CP Cotswold 105 Tetbury Upton CP Cotswold 195 Miserden CP Stroud 16 Barnsley CP Cotswold 106 Todenham CP Cotswold 196 Moreton Valence CP Stroud 17 Barrington CP Cotswold 107 Turkdean CP Cotswold 197 Nailsworth CP Stroud 31 18 Batsford CP Cotswold 108 Upper Rissington CP Cotswold 198 North Nibley CP Stroud 19 Baunton
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 REBUILDING a SUSTAINABLE CANAL BETWEEN HEREFORD & GLOUCESTER
    £1 free to members Summer 2019 REBUILDING A SUSTAINABLE CANAL BETWEEN HEREFORD & GLOUCESTER Working together in the present to revive the past and secure a better future.© W140 cover.indd 1 25/5/19 19:02:20 Working together in the present to revive the past and secure a better future.© Who does what? … To get in touch see “Contacts” see inside the back cover. Honorary Life President: Membership Services Janet Moult Secretary: Nigel Jefferies, Vice Presidents: Gift Aid: Janet Moult R.E. Barnes TD, Richard Graham MP, Mark Harper Press Liaison Vaughan Welch MP, Duff Hart-Davis, James Hervey-Bathurst CBE DL, H &G Canal Sales & Promotion Sir John Lushington Bt, Jesse Norman MP, Diana Organ, Bill Wiggin MP Hereford Roving Team: Janet Moult, Barbara Moses, Ray Moses, Penny Shetliffe, Board of Trustees Pat Skeet, Heather Worth Chairman: Vaughan Welch Gloucester Roving Team: Ginny Birkett, Vice-Chairman: John Kilpatrick The Wharfinger Finance Trustee: Philip Marshall Land and Environment Trustee: John Kilpatrick Editor: Ralph Barber Project Trustee: Eamonn McGurk Design/Production: Ralph Barber Operations Trustee: Tony Sellwood Proofreading: Becca Moult, Janet Moult, Debbie Communications Trustee: Ralph Barber Barber Membership Trustee: Nigel Jefferies Advertising: Ginny Birkett Distribution: Janet Fund Raising Trustee: Debbie Barber Moult Strategy Chair: Ed Helps Digital Photo Library: Colin Dymott Company Secretary: Philip Marshall Website Development Team Leader: Ralph Barber Accounts Examiners:Griffiths Marshall, Web Master: Nick Dymott, Gloucester Committee: Ted Beagles Social Events Organiser: Janet Moult, Support: Nigel Health & Safety Jefferies, Stephen and Gillian Chowns Vaughan Welch Hereford & Gloucester Construction Talks and Walks Safety Assoc. Co-ordinator: Nigel Jefferies , Dick Skeet Restoration & Maintenance Teams Hereford Roving Team: John Pritchard The Wharf House Company Limited Kymin East: Ralph Barber Over, Gloucester, GL2 8DB.
    [Show full text]
  • Aethelflaed: History and Legend
    Quidditas Volume 34 Article 2 2013 Aethelflaed: History and Legend Kim Klimek Metropolitan State University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Klimek, Kim (2013) "Aethelflaed: History and Legend," Quidditas: Vol. 34 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol34/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quidditas 34 (2013) 11 Aethelflaed: History and Legend Kim Klimek Metropolitan State University of Denver This paper examines the place of Aethelflaed, Queen of the Mercians, in the written historical record. Looking at works like the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and the Irish Annals, we find a woman whose rule acted as both a complement to and a corruption against the consolidations of Alfred the Great and Edward’s rule in Anglo-Saxon England. The alternative histories written by the Mercians and the Celtic areas of Ireland and Wales show us an alternative view to the colonization and solidification of West-Saxon rule. Introduction Aethelflaed, Queen and Lady of the Mercians, ruled the Anglo-Sax- on kingdom of Mercia from 911–918. Despite the deaths of both her husband and father and increasing Danish invasions into Anglo- Saxon territory, Aethelflaed not only held her territory but expanded it. She was a warrior queen whose Mercian army followed her west to fight the Welsh and north to attack the Danes.
    [Show full text]
  • Warmington Neighbourhood Plan
    Warmington Neighbourhood Plan Made by resolution of East Northamptonshire Council on 17th December 2019 1 WNP Made Version Version 1.00 17th December 2019 2 WNP Made Version Version 1.00 17th December 2019 Map 1​ - Warmington Designated Neighbourhood Area @Crown copyright and database rights [2016] Ordnance Survey 100055940 Warmington Parish Council (Licensee) Licence number 100053727 ​ 3 WNP Made Version Version 1.00 17th December 2019 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Parish of Warmington 3. Vision and Objectives 4. Development Planning - community engagement 5. Housing Development - how many and where 6. Built Environment - design 7. Natural Environment 8. Community Facilities 9. Traffic and Transport 10. Economic Development 11. Infrastructure and Developer Contributions Appendix 1: Aspirations Appendix 2: Design Code List of maps: Map 1​ - Warmington Designated Neighbourhood Area Map 2 ​- Warmington, as shown on an estate map of 1621 (courtesy of Oundle School). Map 3​ - Flood Risk Areas Map 4​ - Possible Housing Development Sites Map 5 -​ Village Boundary Map 6 - ​Quiet Lane and Local Green Spaces Map 7​ - Other Local Spaces Map 8​ - Community Facilities 4 WNP Made Version Version 1.00 17th December 2019 1. Introduction The parish of Warmington lies in the Nene Valley, in north-east Northamptonshire. 1.1. Development in Warmington is managed by the Local Planning Authority using policies laid out in the Local Plan. These policies are locally focussed implementations of strategic policies from the adopted Local Plan (North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031) and national policies. This Warmington Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) sets out policies that reflect the local identity of Warmington and its community.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Fish Weirs on the Mid-Tidal Reaches of the Severn River (Ashleworth-Arlingham)
    GLEVENSIS 42 2009 MEDIEVAL FISH WEIRS ON THE MID-TIDAL REACHES OF THE SEVERN RIVER (ASHLEWORTH-ARLINGHAM) Terry Moore-Scott INTRODUCTION in and around Gloucester, together with the archaeological evidence that has started to become It is not always appreciated how important a food- available (albeit not from this particular area), has not source fish was in medieval times.This was especially been addressed under one cover. This article is so because the church forbade the eating of meat therefore an attempt to draw together available during the 6 weeks of Lent and on all Fridays, as well information on the subject into a single overview. It as on other important festivals during the church year. looks at terminology encountered in the record, weir In coastal areas sea fish were caught and fishing was construction and regulation over the centuries and at a major activity near large rivers, pools and lakes. the archaeological evidence and ends with a summary Fishponds were created for breeding or as stock of weir-related information for each river-side parish ponds holding fish until they were needed. The studied. Severn in particular was a rich source of fish, notably salmon, lamprey, lampern, eels and shad (a kind of RELEVANT TERMINOLOGY herring). Various methods were employed for catching fish including basket traps, nets and Weir: From O.E. wera, in this context meaning a spearing. But on the river, no less important was the fixed structure of timber stakes and wattle hedging use made of constructed fish weirs (or "fixed engines" projecting out into or across a river to catch fish.
    [Show full text]