DOCSLIB.ORG

On Covariant Emergent Gravity)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Covariant Emergent Gravity) Technische Universiteit Delft Faculteit Elektrotechniek, Wiskunde en Informatica Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics Omtrent Covariante Emergente Zwaartekracht (Engelse titel: On Covariant Emergent Gravity) Verslag ten behoeve van het Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics als onderdeel ter verkrijging van de graad van BACHELOR OF SCIENCE in TECHNISCHE WISKUNDE & TECHNISCHE NATUURKUNDE door Arthur Carel Platschorre Delft, Nederland 12 juli 2019 Copyright © 2019 door Arthur Carel Platschorre. Alle rechten voorbehouden. BSc verslag TECHNISCHE WISKUNDE & TECHNISCHE NATUURKUNDE “Omtrent Covariante Emergente Zwaartekracht ” (Engelse titel: “On Covariant Emergent Gravity ”) Arthur Carel Platschorre Technische Universiteit Delft Begeleiders Dr. Paul M. Visser Dr. Jos M. Thijssen Overige commissieleden Prof. Dr. ir. C. Vuik Dr. Stephan W. H. Eijt Dr. Jeroen G. Spandaw 12 juli, 2019 Delft Bachelor Thesis On Covariant Emergent Gravity Arthur Platschorre Delft University of Technology Delft University of Technology Bachelor Thesis On Covariant Emergent Gravity Author: Supervisors: Arthur C. Platschorre Dr. Paul M. Visser Dr. Jos M. Thijssen Committee members: Dr. Paul M. Visser Dr. Jos M. Thijssen Prof. Dr. ir. C. Vuik Dr. Stephan W. H. Eijt Dr. Jeroen G. Spandaw A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Applied Physics & Applied Mathematics at Mathematical Physics Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science July 12, 2019 Cover image copyright © ESA/Hubble iii Declaration of Authorship I, Arthur C. Platschorre, declare that this thesis titled, “On Covariant Emergent Gravity ” and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: • This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. • Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. • Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed. • Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. • I have acknowledged all main sources of help. • Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself. Signed: Date: v “Oh leave the Wise our measures to collate One thing at least is certain, light has weight One thing is certain, and the rest debate— Light rays, when near the Sun, do not go straight.” Sir Arthur Eddington vii DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Abstract On Covariant Emergent Gravity by Arthur C. Platschorre This report focuses on covariant emergent gravity (CEG), a coordinate-free formulation by Sabine Hossenfelder of Erik Verlinde’s emergent gravity (EG). In (C)EG, gravity is considered an emergent, entropic force arising from shifts in the entropy content of the universe due to matter. The main goal of this report is to identify experimentally verifiable results for CEG through a theoretical analysis of the covariant field equations. The initial goal of this report was to understand both EG and CEG. We have expanded upon this goal both theoretically and numerically. Our theoretical expansion consists of two parts: a gravitational lensing formalism for CEG and an attempt at a cosmological model. The lensing formalism includes a lensing potential that can be applied to general lensing systems. We show that current assumptions in CEG on the imposter field result in a lensing equation that predicts that the amount of baryonic matter in a galaxy as measured by strong lensing should differ from the amount of baryonic matter as measured from the rotation curves. We have also included an attempt at a cosmological model in which we solve for a vacuum dominated and a matter dominated universe in CEG. Our numerical expansion also consists of two parts. In our first numerical expansion, we propose and test an iterative algorithm to solve for CEG and MOND in cases of cylindrical symmetric baryonic densities. This is done using an iterative algorithm based on Fourier- Bessel transforms. The algorithm can also be applied to arbitrary baryonic densities using just Fourier methods. In our second numerical expansion, we fitted both CEG and MOND to 131 galaxies from the SPARC database. The fittings were done by employing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) fitting algorithm using three fit parameters. Both MOND and CEG provide good fits to the rotation curves. Out of the 131 fits, 9 fits (7%) were poor fits (R2 < 0) and 62 galaxies (47%) were excellent fits (R2 > 0:9) and 94 gaxlies (72%) good fits (R2 > 0:7). We also provide fits to galaxies that are traditionally considered hard to fit with dark matter maximum-disk models. Such goods fit for CEG are in contrast to EG, which was found to be a bad fit to the rotation curves by the SPARC team. However, scatter plots show a clear correlation between the MOND and CEG fit parameters, making it hard to distinguish between the two experimentally on the basis of rotation curves or other Newtonian features. Another experimentally verifiable result is the proposed lensing formalism, which could be tested by comparing rotation curves of galaxies to strong lensing. We recommend further research into covariant features of both theories in order to arrive at experimentally verifiable differences. Other interesting topics of follow-up research include using the numerical method to solve for the evolution of the galactic disk or in cases that the magnetic term in CEG or MOND becomes non-negligible. The connection to both dark matter and dark energy also make CEG an interesting theory to further research in cosmology. ix Acknowledgements Even-though the rest of this report contains general relativity, curved space-times and tensors, this might be the hardest part of all. I would like to express my sincere and utmost gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Paul Visser for the countless meetings we had, the countless hours he has put into checking and correcting this report, but most of all for the work he has put in me and my development as a physicist. During the span of this project, I have been free to explore general relativity, classic field theory, cosmology etc. and experiment and discuss my own ideas with mister Visser. Such a mentor and guide is priceless and has allowed me to grow into the physicist I am today. Thank you for the time you have put into this report! Thank you for the time you have put in me! And most of all, thank you for your faith in me! We would also like to thank Dr. Jos Thijssen for his opinions and guidance on the numer- ical implementation of the presented algorithm and the other committee members for their willingness to review this report. xi Contents Declaration of Authorship iii Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix 1 Introduction1 1.1 Introduction...................................1 1.2 Structure of the report..............................1 1.3 Reading routes.................................2 1.3.1 Bachelor route.............................2 1.3.2 Astrophysical route...........................2 1.3.3 Theoretical route............................3 2 Astrophysics and galaxies5 2.1 Rotation curves.................................5 2.2 Observed velocities and dark matter......................7 2.3 Modified gravity................................7 2.4 The structure of galaxies............................9 2.5 Galactic velocities................................ 11 2.6 The SPARC database.............................. 11 2.6.1 Gas profile............................... 12 2.6.2 Stellar disk............................... 13 2.6.3 Mass-to-light ratio........................... 13 2.7 Dark matter in galaxies............................. 14 2.8 Covariant Emergent Gravity.......................... 14 2.8.1 Quantum gravity............................ 14 2.8.2 Covariant Emergent Gravity...................... 14 3 From Newtonian to Einsteinian gravity 17 3.1 Classical Gravity................................ 17 3.2 Particles and Field, What’s the difference?................... 18 3.3 Particles and Fields: The field equations.................... 19 3.4 Curved space-time............................... 21 3.5 Covariant Derivatives.............................. 22 3.6 Other uses of the metric............................. 24 3.7 General relativity................................ 24 3.8 Cosmology................................... 25 4 Emergent Gravity 27 4.1 Entropic Gravity................................ 27 4.1.1 Emergent properties.......................... 27 4.1.2 Entropy and emergent forces...................... 28 xii 4.1.3 Bekenstein’s entropy.......................... 29 4.1.4 Entropic gravity: Verlinde’s first paper................. 30 4.2 Emergent Gravity; Verlinde’s first paper.................... 31 4.2.1 Newton’s law of gravity........................ 32 4.2.2 General matter distributions...................... 33 4.2.3 Critique................................. 33 4.3 Apparant dark matter; Erik Verlinde’s second paper.............. 34 4.3.1 Entropy and the cosmological constant................ 34 4.3.2 Introducing mass............................ 36 4.3.3 Mass and entropy............................ 36 4.3.4 Entropy difference........................... 37 4.3.5 Interpretation of results......................... 38 4.4 Stresses and Strains............................... 38 4.4.1 Theory of Strain and Stress......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emergence and Phenomenology in Quantum Gravity
    Emergence and Phenomenology in Quantum Gravity by Isabeau Premont-Schwarz´ A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2010 © Isabeau Premont-Schwarz´ 2010 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT This thesis is based on the following five articles: • A. Hamma, F. Markopoulou, I. Pr´emont-Schwarz and S. Severini, “Lieb-Robinson bounds and the speed of light from topological order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 017204 [arXiv:0808.2495 [quant-ph]]. • I. Pr´emont-Schwarz ,A. Hamma, I. Klich and F. Markopoulou, “Lieb-Robinson bounds for commutator-bounded operators ,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 040102(R) (2010) .[arXiv:0912.4544 [quant-ph]]. • I. Pr´emont-Schwarz and J. Hnybida, “Lieb-Robinson bounds with dependence on interaction strengths, ” [arXiv:1002.4190 [math-ph]]. • L. Modesto and I. Pr´emont-Schwarz, “Self-dual Black Holes in LQG: Theory and Phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 064041 (2009) [arXiv:0905.3170 [hep-th]]. • S. Hossenfelder, L. Modesto and I. Pr´emont-Schwarz, “A model for non-singular black hole collapse and evaporation ,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 044036 (2010) [arXiv:0912.1823 [gr-qc]]. I did the majority of the work in the first article, but the project was initiated by Fotini Markopoulou-Kalamara and Alioscia Hamma and the manuscript was mostly written by Alioscia Hamma.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabine Hossenfelder on “The Case Against Beauty in Physics” Julia
    Rationally Speaking #211: Sabine Hossenfelder on “The case against beauty in physics” Julia: Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense. I'm your host, Julia Galef, and I'm here with today's guest, Sabine Hossenfelder. Sabine is a theoretical physicist, focusing on quantum gravity. She's a research fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, and blogs at Back Reaction. She just published the book, "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray." "Lost in Math” argues that physicists, in at least certain sub-fields, evaluate theories based heavily on aesthetics, like is this theory beautiful? Instead of simply, what does the evidence suggest is true? The book is full of interviews Sabine did with top physicists, where she tries to ask them: what's the justification for this? Why should we expect beauty to be a good guide to truth? And, spoiler alert, ultimately, she comes away rather unsatisfied with the answers. So, we're going to talk about "Lost in Math" and the case for and against beauty in physics. Sabine, welcome to the show. Sabine: Hello. Julia: So, probably best to start with: what do you mean by beauty, in this context? And is it closer to a kind of “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” thing, like, every physicist has their own sort of aesthetic sense? Or is more like there's a consensus among physicists about what constitutes a beautiful theory? Sabine: Interestingly enough, there's mostly consensus about it. Let me put ahead that I will not try to tell anyone what beauty means, I am just trying to summarize what physicists seem to mean when they speak of beauty, when they say “that theory is beautiful.” There are several ingredients to this sense of beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Introduction to Fine-Tuning
    A Natural Introduction to Fine-Tuning Julian De Vuyst ∗ Department of Physics & Astronomy, Ghent University, Krijgslaan, S9, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Abstract A well-known topic within the philosophy of physics is the problem of fine-tuning: the fact that the universal constants seem to take non-arbitrary values in order for live to thrive in our Universe. In this paper we will talk about this problem in general, giving some examples from physics. We will review some solutions like the design argument, logical probability, cosmological natural selection, etc. Moreover, we will also discuss why it's dangerous to uphold the Principle of Naturalness as a scientific principle. After going through this paper, the reader should have a general idea what this problem exactly entails whenever it is mentioned in other sources and we recommend the reader to think critically about these concepts. arXiv:2012.05617v1 [physics.hist-ph] 10 Dec 2020 ∗[email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction3 2 A Take on Constants3 2.I The Role of Units . .4 2.II Derived vs Fundamental Constants . .5 3 The Concept of Naturalness6 3.I Technical Naturalness . .6 3.I.a A Wilsonian Perspective . .6 3.I.b A Brief History . .8 3.II Numerical/General Naturalness . .9 4 The Fine-Tuning Problem9 5 Some Examples from Physics 10 5.I The Cosmological Constant Problem . 10 5.II The Flatness Problem . 11 5.III The Higgs Mass . 12 5.IV The Strong CP Problem . 13 6 Resolutions to Fine-Tuning 14 6.I We are here, full stop . 14 6.II Designed like Clockwork .
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Bachelor Thesis University of Groningen Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and a Possible Microscopic Description Author: Supervisor: L.M. Mooiweer prof. dr. E. Pallante Abstract Nowadays, the mass discrepancy in the universe is often interpreted within the paradigm of Cold Dark Matter (CDM) while other possibilities are not excluded. The main idea of this thesis is to develop a better theoretical understanding of the hidden mass problem within the paradigm of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). Several phenomenological aspects of MOND will be discussed and we will consider a possible microscopic description based on quantum statistics on the holographic screen which can reproduce the MOND phenomenology. July 10, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 The Problem of the Hidden Mass . .3 2 Modified Newtonian Dynamics6 2.1 The Acceleration Constant a0 .................................7 2.2 MOND Phenomenology . .8 2.2.1 The Tully-Fischer and Jackson-Faber relation . .9 2.2.2 The external field effect . 10 2.3 The Non-Relativistic Field Formulation . 11 2.3.1 Conservation of energy . 11 2.3.2 A quadratic Lagrangian formalism (AQUAL) . 12 2.4 The Relativistic Field Formulation . 13 2.5 MOND Difficulties . 13 3 A Possible Microscopic Description of MOND 16 3.1 The Holographic Principle . 16 3.2 Emergent Gravity as an Entropic Force . 16 3.2.1 The connection between the bulk and the surface . 18 3.3 Quantum Statistical Description on the Holographic Screen . 19 3.3.1 Two dimensional quantum gases . 19 3.3.2 The connection with the deep MOND limit .
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizing Entropic Force Formalism
    Yongpyung 2012, Greenpia Condo, Feb. 21st 2012 GENERALIZING ENTROPIC FORCE FORMALISM Jin-Ho Cho (Hanyang University) w/ Hosin Gong, Hyosung Kim (POSTECH) Motivation (for the entropic force) Quantum Gravity .....not successful so far the role of gravity in AdS/CFT tree level supergravity (closed string) / quantum SYM (open string) Fundamental or Emergent? Entropic Force rubber band tends to increase the entropy S : larger S : smaller [Halliday et al., Fundamentals of Physics] Verlinde’s Idea [Erik Verlinde, 1001.0785] entropic force : F x = T S 4 4 3 holographic principle : Ac /G~ = N E = NkBT/2 T = ~a/2πkBc entropy change : S =2πkB( x mc/~) 4 4 (for a screen shift x ) 4 Newtonian Physics Newton’s law : (a planar screen) T = ~a/2πckB S =2πkB( x mc/~) 4 4 F x = T S 4 4 ~a 2πkBmc x = 4 2πk c ✓ B ◆✓ ~ ◆ = ma x 4 3 Gravitational force : (a spherical screen) N = Ac /G~ 2 Mc = E = NkBT/2 1 Ac3 ~a r2c2 = = a 2 G 2πc ✓ ~ ◆✓ ◆ G Q1: Cosmological Constant ? g R ab R + ⇤g =8⇡GT ab − 2 ab ab 3 Ac /G~ = N F x = T S S =2πkB( x mc/~) 4 4 E = NkBT/2 4 4 T = ~a/2πkBc ‘Volume Energy’ NkBT E = Mc2 +↵V = 2 N~ a ~a = T = 4⇡c 2⇡ckB 2 Ac a 3 = N = Ac /G~ 4⇡G 4⇡GM 4⇡G↵V a = + A Ac2 Determination of ↵ spherically symmetric case GM 4⇡G↵r a = + = Φ r2 3c2 r GM c2⇤r = Newtonian limit of Einstein eq. r2 − 3 c4 ↵ = ⇤ −4⇡G Einstein equation 4 c NkBT E = Mc2 ⇤V = − 4⇡G 2 c4 k c3 Mc2 ⇤ dV = B TdN = adA − 4⇡G 2 4⇡G Z Z Z 1 a b 1 a b 2 T Tg n ⇠ dV ⇤gabn ⇠ dV ab − 2 ab −4⇡G Z⌃ ✓ ◆ Z⌃ 1 = R na⇠b dV 4⇡G ab Z⌃ Q2: Entropic Coulomb Force ? [JHC & Hyosung Kim, 2012 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Members Elect Barry Barish As Next APS Vice-President
    October 2008 Volume 17, No. 9 www.aps.org/publications/apsnews 21st Century Campaign Nears Goal APS NEWS and Needs Your Support! A PublicAtion of the AmericAn PhysicAl society • www.APs.org/PublicAtions/APsnews (See insert) Energy Efficiency Crucial to Achieving Energy Security Members Elect Barry Barish and Reducing Global Warming, States APS Report as next APS Vice-President Tapping wasted energy from miles per gallon mileage for cars needs because they require sig- APS members have elected in physics from the University of inefficient automobiles, homes and and other light-duty vehicles by nificant scientific and engineering Barry Barish, Linde Professor of California, Berkeley. He joined businesses is equivalent to discov- 2030 and the elimination of energy breakthroughs in several critical Physics Emeritus at Caltech, as the faculty at Caltech in 1963. ering a hidden energy reserve that from fossil fuels in new residential areas. the Society’s next vice president. Among his noteworthy experi- will help the United States improve buildings by 2020. The study also calls on Congress Barish will assume the office in ments were those performed at its energy security and reduce glob- and the White House to increase January 2009. At the same time, Fermilab using high-energy neu- al warming, an APS study panel has spending on research and develop- Curtis Callan of trino collisions to concluded. ment of next-generation building Princeton Univer- reveal the quark Their report, Energy Future: technologies, training scientists sity will become substructure of Think Efficiency, states that the key who work on building technologies president-elect, and the nucleon.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantized Vortices in Superfluid Dark Matter
    Quantized Vortices in Superfluid Dark Matter Renate Mauland Master’s Thesis, Spring 2019 ii Copyright c 2019, Renate Mauland This work, entitled “Quantized Vortices in Superfluid Dark Matter” is distributed under the terms of the Public Library of Science Open Access License, a copy of which can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright. Cover Photo: Open Source Image from www.pexels.com. Abstract In a recent paper by Berezhiani and Khoury [1], a superfluid dark matter (DM) model was presented. The model consists of light axion-like DM particles (m ∼ eV), which condense and form a superfluid at galactic scales. The superfluid exhibits collective excitations known as phonons, which interact with baryons and mediate a force similar to that of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). The superfluid DM model therefore combines the success of MOND at small scales with that of the ΛCDM model at large scales. By analogy with superfluids studied in the lab, we expect a grid of vortices with quantized circulation to form in a rotating galaxy containing superfluid DM. In this thesis, we explore the properties of the superfluid DM vortices and their impact on the surroundings. We find that the vortex cores are small, 10−4 − 10−3 m, and that the vortices are separated by vast distances, ∼ 0:002 AU. The viable parameter space of the model is found to be substantial, and a reduction in the DM particle mass results in larger vortices with a higher energy. Yet, no combination of parameters explored here give vortices energetic enough to have a noticeable effect on the galaxy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    SEBASTIAN DE HARO Curriculum Vitae Assistant Professor in Philosophy of Science at the Institute for Logic, Language and Computation and the Institute of Physics of the University of Amsterdam 1. RESEARCH PROFILE Areas of specialisation: Philosophy of Science, History and Philosophy of Physics, Theoretical Physics Areas of competence: Epistemology, Metaphysics, Ethics, Philosophical and Social Aspects of Information, History of Science, History of Philosophy, Philosophy of Logic and Language, Philosophy of Mathematics 2. PREVIOUS POSITIONS • Lecturer (2009-2020), Amsterdam University College (AUC), University of Amsterdam. Tasks: teaching, curriculum development and evaluation, thesis supervision, member of the BSA committee. Between 2009-2015 I also had tutoring responsibilities. • Lecturer (2019-2020, fixed term), Department of Philosophy, Free University Amsterdam • Lecturer in theoretical physics (fixed term), Institute for Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam. Teaching, research, thesis supervision. 02/12 - 07/14. • Research associate. Managing editor of Foundations of Physics on behalf of Gerard ’t Hooft, Spinoza Institute/ITP, Utrecht University and Springer Verlag, 2008-2009. Research, managing editorial office, setting up new projects, contact Editorial Board. 3. PUBLICATIONS Total number of citations (all publications): 2,751. i10-index: 33. h-index: 22 Full list of publications and citation information via Google scholar profile: http://scholar.google.nl/citations?user=rmXDqN4AAAAJ&hl=nl&oi=ao Journal articles, book chapters, and book reviews General philosophy of science: journal articles (6) 1. ‘The Empirical Under-determination Argument Against Scientific Realism for Dual Theories’. Erkenntnis, 2021. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10670-020-00342-0 2. ‘Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship’.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry at Large Distance Scales
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server PUPT-1925 Supersymmetry at Large Distance Scales Herman Verlinde Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Abstract We propose that the UV/IR relation that underlies the AdS/CFT duality may provide a natural mechanism by which high energy supersymmetry can have large distance conse- quences. We motivate this idea via (a string realization of) the Randall-Sundrum scenario, in which the observable matter is localized on a matter brane separate from the Planck brane. As suggested via the holographic interpretation of this scenario, we argue that the local dynamics of the Planck brane – which determines the large scale 4-d geometry – is protected by the high energy supersymmetry of the dual 4-d theory. With this assumption, we show that the total vacuum energy naturally cancels in the effective 4-d Einstein equa- tion. This cancellation is robust against changes in the low energy dynamics on the matter brane, which gets stabilized via the holographic RG without any additional fine-tuning. 1. Introduction The observed smallness of the cosmological constant requires a remarkable cancellation of all vacuum energy contributions [1]. Supersymmetry seems at present the only known symmetry that could naturally explain this cancellation, but thus far no mechanism for supersymmetry breaking is known that would not destroy this property. Nonetheless, in searching for a possible resolution of the cosmological constant problem, it seems natural to include supersymmetry as a central ingredient. What would then be needed, however, is a mechanism – some UV/IR correspondence – by which the short distance cancellations of supersymmetry can somehow be translated into a long distance stability of the cosmological evolution equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal Length Scale Scenarios for Quantum Gravity
    Minimal Length Scale Scenarios for Quantum Gravity Sabine Hossenfelder Nordita Roslagstullsbacken 23 106 91 Stockholm Sweden email: [email protected] Abstract We review the question of whether the fundamental laws of nature limit our ability to probe arbitrarily short distances. First, we examine what insights can be gained from thought experiments for probes of shortest distances, and summarize what can be learned from different approaches to a theory of quantum gravity. Then we discuss some models that have been developed to implement a minimal length scale in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. These models have entered the literature as the generalized uncertainty principle or the modified dispersion relation, and have allowed the study of the effects of a minimal length scale in quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, thermodynamics, black-hole physics and cosmology. Finally, we touch upon the question of ways to circumvent the manifestation of a minimal length scale in short-distance physics. arXiv:1203.6191v2 [gr-qc] 30 Apr 2013 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 A Minimal History 5 3 Motivations 10 3.1 Thoughtexperiments................................ ... 10 3.1.1 The Heisenberg microscope with Newtonian gravity . ... 10 3.1.2 The general relativistic Heisenberg microscope . .... 12 3.1.3 Limit to distance measurements . 15 3.1.4 Limit to clock synchronization . 16 3.1.5 Limit to the measurement of the black-hole–horizon area . ..... 17 3.1.6 A device-independent limit for non-relativistic particles . .... 18 3.1.7 Limits on the measurement of spacetime volumes . ... 20 3.2 StringTheory...................................... 21 3.2.1 Generalized uncertainty .
    [Show full text]
  • A Unitary S-Matrix for 2D Black Hole Formation and Evaporation
    PUPT-1380 IASSNS-HEP-93/8 February 1993 A Unitary S-matrix for 2D Black Hole Formation and Evaporation Erik Verlinde School of Natural Sciences Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 and Herman Verlinde Joseph Henry Laboratories Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544 arXiv:hep-th/9302022v1 7 Feb 1993 Abstract We study the black hole information paradox in the context of a two-dimensional toy model given by dilaton gravity coupled to N massless scalar fields. After making the model well-defined by imposing reflecting boundary conditions at a critical value of the dilaton field, we quantize the theory and derive the quantum S-matrix for the case that N=24. This S-matrix is unitary by construction, and we further argue that in the semiclassical regime it describes the formation and subsequent Hawking evaporation of two-dimensional black holes. Finally, we note an interesting correspondence between the dilaton gravity S-matrix and that of the c = 1 matrix model. 1. Introduction The discovery that black holes can evaporate by emitting thermal radiation has led to a longstanding controversy about whether or not quantum coherence can be maintained in this process. Hawking’s original calculation [1] suggests that an initial state, describing matter collapsing into a black hole, will eventually evolve into a mixed state describing the thermal radiation emitted by the black hole. The quantum physics of black holes thus seems inherently unpredictable. However, this is clearly an unsatisfactory conclusion, and several attempts have been made to find a description of black hole evaporation in accordance with the rules of quantum mechanics [2, 3], but so far all these attempts have run into serious difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Revival of MOND Or the Gravity Law Without Universalism Abstract
    Revival of MOND or the Gravity Law without universalism Dmitri Martila Institute of Theoretical Physics, Tartu University, 4 Tähe Street, 51010 Tartu, Estonia∗ (Dated: January 31, 2020) Abstract Is argued that modified gravity can describe Dark Matter, if one understands the modification of gravity as the tensor field Xµν = Xµν(t; x; y; z) in Einstein’s equations, which is filling the Universe in addition to the Higgs boson field and the “inflaton field”. ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 I. CURRENT STATUS OF MOND What is the nature of dark matter? Is it a particle, or do the phenomena attributed to dark matter actually require a modification of the laws of gravity? Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) is a hypothesis that proposes a modification of Newton’s laws to account for observed properties of galaxies. It is an alternative to the hypothesis of dark matter in terms of explaining why galaxies do not appear to obey the currently understood laws of physics. Created in 1982 and first published in 1983 by the Israel physicist Mordehai Milgrom [1], the hypothesis’ original motivation was to explain why the velocities of stars in galaxies were observed to be larger than expected based on Newtonian mechanics. MOND is an example of a class of theories known as modified gravity, and is an alternative to the hypothesis that the dynamics of galaxies are determined by massive, invisible dark matter halos. Since Milgrom’s original proposal, MOND has successfully predicted a variety of galactic phenomena that are difficult to understand from a dark matter perspective [2].
    [Show full text]