DOCSLIB.ORG

Comcast Rate Changes Coupled with Bandwidth Limits Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

  1064
Copy Link
_____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328114 - Comcast Rate Changes coupled with bandwidth limits Date: 11/25/2016 5:08:36 PM City/State/Zip: Yulee, Florida 32097 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description I've previously filed several complains against Comcast but today is a whole new issue! I got my bill today and noticed on the very last page was a notification of future increasing in the price of plans, but these changes in rates are specifically made to reduce the price between their higher speed plans so you might as well get 110mbit internet even though if you use more than 3mbit constantly over the month you'll be facing additional charges. AND to top it off, their bandwidth tracker on their website so you can see if you need to calm down your internet usage for the month to avoid charges has been down since the day they rolled out these new bandwidth caps. This would just be capitalism if there were competition, but Comcast has already negotiated out territories so there will be no competition in my county! they are THE ONLY broadband internet provider available at my address, even AT&T doesn't offer broadband at my particular address. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328234 - Comcast Data Caps Date: 11/25/2016 6:57:18 PM City/State/Zip: Palo Alto, California 94301 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description Comcast has again introduced data caps to our region, which violates network neutrality. They are effectively charging an additional 80% to have the same speeds as I currently have (forcing an "unlimited tier"). Additionally, any purchases made from the xfinity video-on-demand system is exempt from this bandwidth usage. This is a ploy for Comcast to neuter other online streaming services while allowing their platform to remain unencumbered. This violates the principles of net neutrality, and should be immediately struck down. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328282 - Comcast home internet data caps Date: 11/25/2016 7:57:27 PM City/State/Zip: Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description There is no guarantee of accuracy or transparency: Internet usage amounts should be accurate and transparent to users affected by it. However that is not the case at all, there is no third party government agency in charge of regulating broadband metering. Comcast contracts out its metering to a third party vendor and its methods of measurement are internal and not open to the public at all. Just this year alone Comcast has received thirteen thousand complaints about their data caps and their terrible accuracy in measurement. Almost everyone who has to deal with this caps seems to have a story of their ISP charging them for data usage that would be impossible given their current bandwidth. Discourages cord cutting and stifles competition: Data caps exist solely as a consumer control measure to stifle competition and cause users to be biased against applications based on the data amount they use. For example Netflix which lists high quality HD as using 3 GB per hour and Ultra HD as using 7gb per hour is immediately affected by this. As Ultra HD becomes more common and using 7gb of data for an hour of video streaming becomes common place users affected by data caps will hit their limits more easily causing them to be charged overages. This will cause users to drop Netflix in favor of less data intensive services which Comcast will only be too happy to provide through cable. Families of five living in a home with heavy Netflix usage will already be pushing this current limit. This isn't just for videos of course, people who use services like Steam will be hit just as hard especially as the size of games increases, data intensive services that would have otherwise been developed will languish on the vine as data caps cause consumers to be biased against them. Users have little choice in what ISP they must subscribe to: The Internet is no longer a luxury that most can live without. For many it has become an essential utility much like electricity. In any thread regarding complaints against Comcast or any ISP for that matter the main complaint of users is that they have no choice in their ISP. Those lucky enough to live in major metropolitan areas may be fortunate enough to have the choice of maybe two or more ISPs but for many users the local ISP is the only choice they have which grants that business a monopoly in their area. In a happier world there would be dozens of ISPs each competing with each other and vying for market share so the poor behavior of one company only provides an opportunity for another to gain more customers. Sadly most Americans don't live in that kind of free economic environment. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328325 - Cable One Data Cap - Won't allow us to upgrade to Business service Date: 11/25/2016 9:00:52 PM City/State/Zip: Meridian, Idaho 83642 Company Complaining About: Cable One _____________________________________________________________________________ Description FCC, Cable One is engaging in a ridiculous practice with their Business Class service. We tried to upgrade our Residential Service to Business Class service as my wife recently started her home business. I called Cable One on her behalf to upgrade our residential service to their business service but was denied because according to their agent, we had gone over their data cap of a measly 300GB in the last 12 months 2 times, therefore we were not eligible for their business service. This is ridiculous on so many measures that I don't know what to do. The only option we have is to upgrade to their next tier of residential service which bumps the cap to 400GB . We specifically would like to avoid that as we will be requiring a larger download limit due to the business needs. 400GB is nowhere near enough as already exhibited with the recent overages. Cable One's business internet has no data caps which is why we want to sign up for it. The only other ISP in our neighborhood is Century Link, but the fastest speed they offer is 3mbps!! Please help us if you can. Thank you. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328385 - Comcast Data Caps Date: 11/25/2016 10:32:04 PM City/State/Zip: Fort Myers, Florida 33908 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description I'm urging FCC Chairman Wheeler to stand with Internet users and pass strong, loophole-free rules against so called Data Caps. There is no legitimate, technical reason for these data caps. Comcast itself admitted in internal customer service guidelines that these caps aren’t about network congestion. Instead, it claims these data caps are about “fairness,” but the broadband industry continues to see higher revenues and profits with lower costs overall and there’s no argument that these caps are based on any “fair” costs that Internet usage causes. The real reason behind these caps is to protect Comcast’s monopoly over cable TV, making it more expensive for customers to “cut the cord” even if they want to choose other video options. And by exempting only its own online video application from the cap, Comcast gives Stream TV an advantage over all competing online video applications. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328447 - Comcast/Xfinity Capping Internet usage Date: 11/26/2016 12:19:50 AM City/State/Zip: Littleton, Colorado 80120 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description Comcast put in effect a data cap of 1 terabyte on our home internet without any proper notice. With this cap any usage over 1 terabyte of data will be a charge of 10$ per 50 gigabytes of data with the option of paying 50$ extra to have unlimited data. This principle of an unnecessary increase of cost of quantity without increasing quality is not only unfounded but also unjust. There is no valid reason for this data cap and we did not receive any proper notification of this new data cap until the notification that we had used up over 90% of the data already. Comcast argues that this new restriction is based on a principle of fairness, per the picture provided, but by doing this they are flouting the principle by which they claim to operate on. A family that pays extra for faster speeds will have the same cap as someone that pays less, which is just ridiculous claptrap. The FCC needs to interfere and stop Comcast from limiting data with no justifiable reason. _____________________________________________________________________________ Ticket: # 1328491 - Comcast Data Limits Date: 11/26/2016 3:10:29 AM City/State/Zip: Centennial, Colorado 80015 Company Complaining About: Comcast _____________________________________________________________________________ Description I received a letter from Comcast informing me that they would begin enforcing arbitrary "data caps" on my account. They've taken my virtually unlimited access to information, crippled it, and put an additional price tag on
Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

    Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from__________ to __________ Commission File No.: 000-09881 SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 54-1162807 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 500 Shentel Way, Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (540) 984-4141 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: Common Stock (No Par Value) SHEN NASDAQ Global Select Market 49,932,073 (The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding on (Title of Class) (Trading Symbol) (Name of Exchange on which Registered) February 23, 2021) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
  • Tuning Into the On-Demand Streaming Culture—Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’S Media Landscape

    Tuning Into the On-Demand Streaming Culture—Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’S Media Landscape

    UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title Tuning Into the On-Demand Streaming Culture—Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’s Media Landscape Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2152q2t4 Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 27(1) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Roth, Blaine Publication Date 2020 DOI 10.5070/LR8271048856 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California TUNING INTO THE ON-DEMAND STREAMING CULTURE— Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’s Media Landscape Blaine Roth Abstract Hollywood television and film production has largely been unionized since the early 1930s. Today, due in part to technological advances, the industry is much more expansive than it has ever been, yet the Hollywood unions, known as “guilds,” have arguably not evolved at a similar pace. Although the guilds have adapted to the needs of their members in many aspects, have they suc- cessfully adapted to the evolving Hollywood business model? This Comment puts a focus on the Writers Guild of America, Directors Guild of America, and the Screen Actors Guild, known as SAG-AFTRA following its merger in 2012, and asks whether their respective collective bargaining agreements are out-of- step with the evolution of the industry over the past ten years, particularly in the areas of new media and the direct-to-consumer model. While analyzing the guilds in the context of the industry environment as it is today, this Com- ment contends that as the guilds continue to feel more pronounced effects from the evolving media landscape, they will need to adapt at a much more rapid pace than ever before in order to meet the needs of their members.
  • Media Ownership Chart

    Media Ownership Chart

    In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly . In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world's largest media corporation. In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly , shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth. Who Controls the Media? Parent General Electric Time Warner The Walt Viacom News Company Disney Co. Corporation $100.5 billion $26.8 billion $18.9 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues $23 billion 1998 revenues $13 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues Background GE/NBC's ranks No.
  • Broadband to Make Key Transitions in 2020

    Broadband to Make Key Transitions in 2020

    INDUSTRY ANALYSIS Broadband to Make Key Transitions In 2020 Large incumbent telcos, independent telcos, cable operators and electric cooperatives set bold broadband plans for 2020. By Sean Buckley / Broadband Communities s the new year begins, BROADBAND FTTH PENETRATION TO RISE COMMUNITIES is asking industry AT&T, CenturyLink and Verizon furthered Acolleagues what will drive the broadband fiber to the home (FTTH) growth in 2019, a industry in 2020. trend that will continue as providers ramp up Leichtman Research Group (LRG) found new builds and increase penetration. that 82 percent of all U.S. households get internet It’s hard not to notice fiber’s influence on service, of which 96 percent is broadband. broadband. Consider the fact that in 2002, Fiber continues to become a significant only 50,000 U.S. homes had access to fiber factor in the broadband race. Market research connectivity. firm RVA revealed in its North American 2019 Fiber broadband now passes 46.5 million Advanced Broadband Report that broadband unique homes in the United States – about 37 providers had passed 49.2 million homes with percent of total homes – and connects 20.5 fiber, up 17 percent in 2019. million. Unique homes are defined as those with But a key challenge for wireline broadband at least one fiber service marketed. RVA said operators will be how to stay ahead of the this excludes estimates of redundant services impending 5G threat. available to the same home. Jeff Heynen, senior RVA reports the number of homes passed research director for market research firm by fiber has risen 16 percent since 2018.
  • Cable One Copyright Notice

    Cable One Copyright Notice

    Cable One Copyright Notice spiritsWhen absolutelyKalvin brown-nosed when divorced his bricklaying Aamir monitor resupplies blunderingly not slangily and pettily.enough, Opportunistic is Darwin freeze-dried? Jess imprecated Chev cool. usually mired anticipatorily or The discourse itself mostly not protected. How will not included on an amount you wish for many other information will make sure you! This one on its obligations, notices have not responsible for experience for later than in any claimants may restore your package offers in his photographs become aware after traveling down. The proposals submitted or delete these subscriber without prior written permission for tv channels may. Cable trench to rebrand as SparklightTM News. User Manual PTZOptics. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Availability may contact by way affiliated companies, viacom international stock is more accessible through sparklight track. Liability for Providing Hyperlinks to Copyright-Infringing. Copyright owner If its One receives notice compare the. Supplementary information given their videos and it originally transmits or its name, we encourage you visit or even more than sixty days, except in such copy. 1 The good cable system provided the meaning set these in 20117b2. Afp did not. Copyright Violation Notifications in service Account Cox. The evidentiary worth for Six Strikes notices is also debatable as one thus the. The copyright notice of cable was attempted delivery or works? No restrictions or fees on making wireless plan adjustments. Is filed when do cable provider wishes to reason its certificate of franchise authority to. This section prescribes rules governing the unique of unpublished copyright deposits in the aspire of the Copyright Office to the lazy of Congress.
  • News Release

    News Release

    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media contacts: June 4, 2012 Heather Wilner Verizon 908-559-6407 [email protected] Cathy Clarke CNC Associates for Olympusat 508-833-8533 [email protected] Verizon FiOS TV Becomes the Nation’s Leading Provider of Spanish-Language Programming FiOS TV Gives Customers The Most HD Spanish-language Channels Available Nationwide, With 10 New Channels from Olympusat and Multimedios Television NEW YORK – Verizon FiOS TV has become the country’s leading television provider of Spanish-language channels, announcing today the launch of 10 new Spanish-language channels in high definition. Verizon now offers up to 75 Spanish-language channels on FiOS TV, dependent on the local channels available in each market. Nine of the 10 new Spanish-language HD channels are provided by Olympusat Inc., a leading independent distributor of Hispanic content in the United States. Known as ULTRA Verizon News Release, page 2 HDPlex, the Olympusat channels are: Ultra Cine, Ultra Fiesta, Ultra Kidz, Ultra Mex, Ultra Luna, Ultra Macho, Ultra Film, Ultra Docu and Ultra Clásico. The 10th channel, Multimedios Television, offers Spanish-language family and entertainment programming broadcast from Monterrey, Mexico. FiOS TV recently completed the launch of all 10 channels. In addition, Verizon announced last week a new multi-year carriage agreement with Univision Communications, Inc., which includes the launch of three new networks – Univision Deportes, Univision tlnovelas and FOROtv – as well as rights for multiplatform and on demand viewing. “Our customers have told us that high-quality Spanish-language programming helps to keep their culture alive, and we’re helping to make that happen by giving them the content that they want,” said Michelle Webb, director of content strategy and acquisition for Verizon.
  • Tv Guide Listings Cable One

    Tv Guide Listings Cable One

    Tv Guide Listings Cable One Spiros still reifies perfectly while unprogressive Sigfrid wast that bagwig. Toxicant and fruity Johny often somewhyplaster some when objective Salvador dearly is pansophic. or readdress pridefully. Butyric Philbert vaporize breezily or reattains How are does TV Guide app cost? Analytics code has prior to the list of a tv on your mac app might seem to watch tv service a cable tv guide listings appeared on? Get consistent access to string your favorite channels with Spectrum's Channel Guide Our Channel Lineup makes it easy for find except when or where trial can tally your favorite. Louis Cardinals MLB game schedule tv listings news any more at TVGuide NOW Cable Listings KWTV has two buildings in the Oklahoma City metro one. Channel LOUISIANA Baton Rouge New Orleans Lafayette Cox Cable. Over one live tv listings appeared in alabama, llc and a cable provider for your area at the rest of. TV Guide Magazine publishes 26 double issues a handle Each unique issue counts as two issues of the 52 issue annual subscription. Grit TV is now air on digital channel 125 and black cable channels. Which hinder many areas is labeled FOX Sports Midwest Plus Cable One-Joplin 170. Cable office's two TV packages include aid the basic TV channels from FOX to the Disney Channel to ESPN and E Check out draw which TV. TV Listings Guide by time source by channel TV Boise OTA Broadcast of One. Here god the TV Channel lineup but for the Comcast cable system listed by CHANNEL.
  • West Virginia Broadband Enhance Council 2020 Annual Report

    West Virginia Broadband Enhance Council 2020 Annual Report

    2020 West Virginia Broadband Enhancement Council 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing, Continuing and New Initiatives ............................................................................................... 2 3. Broadband Mapping ............................................................................................................................. 4 Key Components of the Interactive Mapping System .................................................................. 4 Broadband Advertised Speed Ranges Interactive Map ................................................................ 5 Broadband Development Hub ...................................................................................................... 6 Public Wi-Fi Map ........................................................................................................................... 6 Public Project Development ......................................................................................................... 7 Speed Tiers by County ................................................................................................................... 8 Speed Tiers Statewide ................................................................................................................... 8 Providers Statewide .....................................................................................................................

  • Residential Rates

    RESIDENTIAL RATES Broadband Internet Services Service Download Upload Data Plan Monthly FreeNet 2 Mbps 1 Mbps Unlimited $0.00 Starter 25 Mbps 3 Mbps 250 GB $39.99 Essential 100 Mbps 5 Mbps 250 GB $69.99 Ultimate 200 Mbps 5 Mbps 250 GB $89.99 Supreme 400 Mbps 10 Mbps Unlimited $139.99 Gig Plus 1000 Mbps 10 Mbps Unlimited $199.99 Internet Service Add-Ons Internet Equipment Fee (Modem Rental) $10.00 Static IP Address $20.00 150 GB of Data (Pre-Purchased) $15.00 Unlimited Data $30.00 Double Upload $20.00 In-House Amplifier $42.00 Brainiac Services HD Cable TV Services Brainiac Services Local 30+ (Including Broadcast $24.99 Brainiacs $10.00 Retransmission Fee of $15.00) SmartNet $11.99 Popular Standard $113.97 SmartNet Plus $19.99 StreamTV Bitdefender $2.99 StreamTV (Requires Local 30+) $5.00 SmartNet Beacon $5.00 50 Additional Hours $5.00 Brainiac Equipment Options Add 1 Stream $5.00 SmartNet Beacon $149.00 StreamTV Box $6.00 Hitron WiFi Extender $49.99 StreamTV Ultra $12.00 Hitron Data Gateway $99.99 Pak Add-Ons (StreamTV or Converter Required) Hitron Voice Gateway $129.99 Digital Plus Pak $4.25 Brainiac Support Services Alma Latina Pak $4.95 HD Plus Pak $8.75 In-Home Support (Non- $90.00 Brainiac Subscriber/Per Hour) Digital Basic Pak $17.00 In-Home Support $45.00 (Brainiac Subscriber/Per Hour) Cable TV Equipment Options Remote PC Optimization (One-Time Fee) $75.00 Guide Navigator Service $1.50 Virus, Adware, Malware HD DTA $1.95 $75.00 Removal (One-Time Fee) Cable Card $3.35 Brainiacs and Bitdefender require a 12-month Digital Converter $6.95 commitment.
  • ATTACHMENT a the FCC’S Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule: an Analysis

    ATTACHMENT a the FCC’S Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule: an Analysis

    ATTACHMENT A The FCC’s Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule: An Analysis by Douglas Gomery Douglas Gomery is professor of media economics and history in the College of Journalism at the University of Maryland. His most recent book, Who Owns the Media? (with Ben Compaine), won the 2000 Picard Prize for the best media economics book of the year. He has published 10 other books, some 500 articles in scholarly journals and encyclopedias, written a column, “The Economics of Television,” for the American Journalism Review, and consulted for both the Federal Communications Commission and the Government Accounting Office. Acknowledgments. The author wishes to thank Eileen Appelbaum for her skills in fashioning this study, and Marilyn Moon for her help in crafting its arguments and for her inspiration as one of America's best public policy analysts. ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE 1 Introduction In 1975 the Federal Communications Commission initiated the newspaper-broadcast cross- ownership rule, which bars a single company from owning a newspaper and a broadcast station in the same market. The purpose of the rule is to prevent any single corporate entity from becoming too powerful a single voice within a community, and thus the rule seeks to maximize diversity under the conditions dictated by the marketplace. The cross-ownership ban does not prevent a newspaper from owning a broadcast station in another market, and indeed many large newspapers — such as the New York Times and the Washington Post — own and operate broadcast stations outside their flagship cities (Compaine and Gomery 2000). Media organizations have largely opposed the rule since its inception, and their prospects for eliminating or limiting it brightened in 1996, when the new Telecommunications Act directed the FCC to continually review all ownership rules.
  • Enforcement Bureau Reminds Mvpds of 2021 Fcc Form 396-C Deadline and Identifies Those Subject to Supplemental Investigation

    Enforcement Bureau Reminds Mvpds of 2021 Fcc Form 396-C Deadline and Identifies Those Subject to Supplemental Investigation

    DA 21-776 Released: July 1, 2021 ENFORCEMENT BUREAU REMINDS MVPDS OF 2021 FCC FORM 396-C DEADLINE AND IDENTIFIES THOSE SUBJECT TO SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION Pursuant to section 76.77 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR § 76.77, a multichannel video program distributor (MVPD) employment unit with six or more full-time employees must file a FCC Form 396-C, Multichannel Video Programming Distributor EEO Program Annual Report, by September 30 each year. By this Notice, we remind MVPDs of this recurring obligation—the deadline for which falls on Thursday, September 30, this year—and identify in the following pages those employment units that must complete the Supplemental Investigation Sheet (SIS). The Form 396-C also designates those filers required to submit the SIS with a check mark in Section I labeled “Supplemental Investigation Sheet attached”. SIS filers should take note of the following important information. • Part I: One job description must be provided for the Officials & Manager category. • Part II: Only questions 2, 4 and 6 must be answered. • Part III: The employment unit’s 2021 EEO Public File Report covering the previous 12 months must be attached. Form 396-C is available via the Commission’s Consolidated Database System (CDBS) Electronic Filing System (https://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbs_ef.htm). Paper versions of the form will not be accepted unless a waiver request of the electronic filing requirement is submitted. Such waivers are not routinely granted. CDBS technical assistance is available at (877) 480-3201. Enforcement Bureau Contacts: Elizabeth E. Goldin, [email protected] & Lynn Kalagian-Jones, [email protected] at 202.418.1450 1 FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT We have estimated that each response to this collection of information will take from 0.166 to 2.5 hours.
  • Universal Service Administrative Company Schools and Libraries

    Universal Service Administrative Company Schools and Libraries

    Universal Service Administrative Company Appendix SL28 Schools and Libraries 2Q2013 Funding Year 2012 Disbursements - 4Q2012 Page 1 of 18 SPIN # Provider Type Service Provider Total Form 474 SPIF Total Form 472 BEAR Total Payments 143000072 CAP Cablevision Lightpath 3,881.11 0.00 3,881.11 143000093 CAP XO Communication Services LLC 18,869.29 235,941.65 254,810.94 143000093 CAP XO Communications, Inc 2,786.78 215,843.99 218,630.77 143000131 CAP Electric Lightwave LLC 0.00 76,664.71 76,664.71 143000297 CAP Connecticut Telephone & Communications System, Inc. 0.00 1,716.96 1,716.96 143001102 CAP TCA Communications, LLC 0.00 287,725.72 287,725.72 143001133 CAP Big River Telephone Company LLC 0.00 71,073.66 71,073.66 143001158 CAP US Link Inc 2,566.80 0.00 2,566.80 143001167 CAP United Communications, Inc. 0.00 2,174.63 2,174.63 143001173 CAP NTS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 0.00 29,608.48 29,608.48 143001179 CAP Midcontinent Communications 279.80 71,675.99 71,955.79 143001196 CAP Deltacom, Inc 7,900.61 120,402.08 128,302.69 143001208 CAP Business Telecom Inc 0.00 8,855.34 8,855.34 143001231 CAP COMMUNICATION OPTIONS, INC. 0.00 0.00 0.00 143001236 CAP First Communications 5,147.11 0.00 5,147.11 143001254 CAP Birch Telecom, Inc. 0.00 33,639.11 33,639.11 143001892 CAP Metamora Telephone Company 923.50 0.00 923.50 143002453 CAP Santa Rosa Telephone Cooperative, Inc.