Models of Public Budgeting and Accounting Reform

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Models of Public Budgeting and Accounting Reform Models of Public Budgeting and 2, Supplement 1 Volume « Accounting Reform Models of Public This book provides a comparative look at financial management systems from a family of systems point of view. Despite the similarity between the models there Budgeting and are significant differences that have evolved over time because of systemic reasons like national culture and values, administrative culture, and constitutional Accounting Reform and organisational arrangements. The book looks at the two major families of accounting regimes: the Anglo-American model and the continental European model and its two subsets of the German tradition and the French tradition as well as how the accounting structure has evolved in China. These papers were originally delivered during a conference in Beijing in support of efforts to reform the public accounting structure in China. Models of Public Budgeting and Accounting Reform OECD's books, periodicals and statistical databases are now available via www.SourceOECD.org, our online library. This book is available to subscribers to the following SourceOECD theme: Governance Ask your librarian for more details of how to access OECD books onl ine, or write to us at [email protected] www.oecd.org 42 2002 13 1 P ISBN 92-64-19897-0 OECD Journal on Budgeting OECD Journal on Budgeting Volume 2, Supplement 1 -:HSTCQE=V^]^\Z: Volume 2, Supplement 1 Models of Public Budgeting and Accounting Reform OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING Volume 2/Supplement 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: – to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; – to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and – to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non- discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). Cette publication est disponible en anglais uniquement. © OECD 2002 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel. (33-1) 44 07 47 70, fax (33-1) 46 34 67 19, for every country except the United States. In the United States permission should be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, (508)750-8400, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 USA, or CCC Online: www.copyright.com. All other applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this book should be made to OECD Publications, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. FOREWORD The papers in this supplement to the OECD Journal on Budgeting originated from an international symposium held in April 2001 in Beijing, China. The symposium was sponsored by the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China and was conducted by the National Institute of Accounting, in association with Tsinghua University’s School of Economics and Management and Institute of Accounting Research. The papers give a comprehensive overview of various OECD Member country accounting models and as such are valuable not only to China, but to all countries. The main theme of these models is accountability and confidence in the execution of the budget plan. While the models are different and constructed to meet the needs of individual countries, there is great utility in presenting a comparative understanding of the theoretical basis for the systems. This understanding is especially important for non-member countries where an OECD “best practices” approach may not be valid. Presentations like these show that there is no single way to construct an accounting system, but rather that principles and common elements are important. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not commit or necessarily reflect those of governments of OECD Member countries. EDITORS James Chan (Editor), Professor of Accounting, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States. Chen Xiaoyue (co-editor), Professor of Accounting and Finance, Tsinghua University; and Vice President, National Accounting Institute, People’s Republic of China. 3 CONTRIBUTORS Richard Allen, Director, Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Program, World Bank, Washington, D.C. Tom Allen, Chairman, Governmental Accounting Standards Board, United States Aad Bac, Professor of Government Accountancy, Tilburg University, Netherlands Eugenio Caperchione, Professor of Public Sector Accounting, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy James Chan, Professor of Accounting, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States Benoit Chevauchez, Director, Public Management Institute, Ministry of Economics, Finance and Industry, France Noel Hepworth, Chairman, Public Sector Committee, European Federation of Accountants; Chairman, Institute of Public Finance, United Kingdom Xiang Huaicheng, Minister of Finance, People’s Republic of China Lou Jiwei, First Vice Minister of Finance, People’s Republic of China Klaus Lüder, Professor Public Financial Management and Business Administration, German Postgraduate School of Administrative Sciences, Speyer, Germany Alex Matheson, Head of Division, Budgeting and Management, Public Management Service, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France Vicente Montesinos, Professor of Accounting, University of Valencia, Spain Riccardo Mussari, Professor of Public Management, University of Siena, Italy June Pallot, Professor Accounting, University of Canterbury, New Zealand Kuno Schedler, Professor of Public Management, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland 4 MODELS OF PUBLIC BUDGETING AND ACCOUNTING REFORM James L. Chan, Editor Chen Xiaoyue, Co-Editor Preface by Xiang Huaicheng...........................................................................7 Introduction by James L. Chan .......................................................................9 1. Accountability and Governance Public Accountability and Government Financial Reporting by Tom L. Allen11 Better Public Sector Governance: The Rationale for Budgeting and Accounting Reform in Western Nations by Alex Matheson ............................................37 2. China and Central-Eastern European Models China by Lou Jiwei .......................................................................................51 Central and Eastern Europe by Richard Allen ..............................................81 3. Anglo-American Models United Kingdom by Noel Hepworth ...........................................................115 New Zealand by June Pallot........................................................................163 United States by James L. Chan..................................................................187 5 4. Continental European Models -1 Germany by Klaus Lüder ..........................................................................2245 Switzerland by Kuno Schedler....................................................................243 Netherlands by Aad Bac..............................................................................265 5. Continental European Models - 2 France by Benoît Chevauchez.....................................................................285 Italy by Eugenio Caperchione and Riccardo Mussari.................................305 Spain by Vicente Montesinos......................................................................333 6 PREFACE BY XIANG HUAICHENG* China’s financial systems have undergone essential changes since China adopted the reform and opening policy. The previous phase focused on fiscal revenues aspects, and the management of expenditures is emphasised in the present phase. The reforms of the fundamental management systems íVXFK as government budgeting, treasury management system and budget accounting system í are particularly emphasised. This is a profound reform – indeed a revolution – of the traditional budget management systems. It covers changes in budget concepts, the budget preparation system and budgetary management. We hope that through this budget reform, we can promote the establishment of a public finance system that corresponds to the socialist market economy. Such a system would make better use of information technology and significantly improve the level of budget management.
Recommended publications
  • The Legal Framework for Budget
    «OECD Journal on Budgeting OECD Journal on Budgeting 4, Volume No. 3 Special Issue Special Issue The Legal Framework for Budget Systems The Legal AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON Framework for The legal basis for budget processes and budget actors varies enormously across OECD countries. For example, the United States has a dozen major laws Budget Systems to support federal government budget processes, while Denmark and Norway have never adopted any such law. AN INTERNATIONAL To understand this situation, this book compares legal frameworks for budgeting COMPARISON in 13 selected OECD countries. It presents detailed case studies of national budget system laws and identifies why the legal frameworks differ so much. The book also looks at theories of public finance and constitutional political economics, and discusses norms for an optimum legal framework. With a focus on similarities and differences in formal laws (constitutions and statutes relating to the budget system), the comparative analysis will be useful for any government planning to reform its budget laws. OECD Journal on Budgeting OECD’s books, periodicals and statistical databases are now available via www.SourceOECD.org, our online library. This book is available to subscribers to the following SourceOECD themes: Finance and Investment/Insurance and Pensions Governance [email protected] www.oecd.org ISSN 1608-7143 42 2004 05 1 P 2004 SUBSCRIPTION (4 ISSUES) Volume 4, No. 3 -:HRLGKI=\VYUUW: Volume 4, No. 3 OECD Journal on Budgeting Volume 4 – No. 3 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Budget Process and the Size of the Budget Author(S): John Ferejohn and Keith Krehbiel Source: American Journal of Political Science, Vol
    The Budget Process and the Size of the Budget Author(s): John Ferejohn and Keith Krehbiel Source: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 31, No. 2 (May, 1987), pp. 296-320 Published by: Midwest Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111078 Accessed: 15-09-2017 21:56 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Midwest Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Political Science This content downloaded from 131.215.23.153 on Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:56:25 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Budget Process and the Size of the Budget John Ferejohn, Stanford University Keith Krehbiel, Stanford University The new congressional budget process provides- members of Congress with a new set of institutional mechanisms for making budget decisions. This article addresses the ques- tion of whether or under what conditions rigid application of the new budget process (modeled as, first, selection of the size of the budget and, second, its division) produces smaller budgets than a piecemeal appropriations process in which the size of the budget is determined residually.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector Reform – an Introduction
    EuropeAid Concept Paper N°1 Public Sector Reform – An Introduction March 2009 Tools and Methods Series Tools Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009 ISBN 978-92-79-13504-0 DOI 10.2783/25964 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER TOOLS AND METHODS SERIES Concept Paper N° 1 Public Sector Reform An Introduction March 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been developed under the supervision of Directorate E on Quality of Operations in EuropeAid (Unit E4 on “Governance, security, human rights and gender”) with the support of Professor Norman Flynn in the frame- work the implementation of the Backbone Strategy on Reforming Technical Cooperation and PIUs. Comments, questions and suggestions are welcomed and should be sent to [email protected] The document is available on: Î • Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/multimedia/publications/index_en.htm Î • Intranet: http://www.cc.cec/dgintranet/europeaid/activities/adm/technical_cooperation/index_en.htm Î • Internet: www.capacity4dev.eu – a dedicated web-based platform on TC reform. This document is the firstConcept paper of the “Tools and Methods series” of EuropeAid presenting the methodo- logical documents produced by Directorate on “Quality of Operations” The collection includes three sub-collections: Guidelines, Reference documents and Concept papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Budgeting and Policy Making
    SIGMA Papers No. 8 Budgeting and Policy OECD Making https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kml6g6wccq0-en General Distribution OCDE/GD(96)110 BUDGETING AND POLICY MAKING SIGMA PAPERS: No. 8 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Paris 1996 40641 Ta. 15411 - 20.05.96 - 03.06.96 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format THE SIGMA PROGRAMME SIGMA -- Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern European Countries -- is a joint initiative of the OECD Centre for Co-operation with the Economies in Transition and EC/PHARE, mainly financed by EC/PHARE. The OECD and several OECD Member countries also provide resources. SIGMA assists public administration reform efforts in Central and Eastern Europe. The OECD -- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development -- is an intergovernmental organisation of 27 democracies with advanced market economies. The Centre channels OECD advice and assistance over a wide range of economic issues to reforming countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. EC/PHARE provides grant financing to support its partner countries in Central and Eastern Europe to the stage where they are ready to assume the obligations of membership of the European Union. Established in 1992, SIGMA operates within the OECD's Public Management Service (PUMA). PUMA provides information and expert analysis on public management to policy-makers in OECD Member countries, and facilitates contact and exchange of experience amongst public sector managers. Through PUMA, SIGMA offers eleven countries a wealth of technical knowledge accumulated over many years of study and action.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Slovenia
    Public administration characteristics and performance in EU28: Slovenia Written by Gregor Virant & Iztok Rakar Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana April – 2018 Social Europe EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Directorate F — Investment Unit F1 — ESF and FEAD: policy and legislation Contact: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Public administration characteristics and performance in EU28: Slovenia Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Support for developing better country knowledge on public administration and institutional capacity building” (VC/2016/0492) Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This country chapter is part of the full report "The Public Administration in the EU 28". This publication has been developed for the European Commission with the technical assistance of the European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), the Hertie School of Governance and Ramboll Management Consulting. It reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Editors: Nick Thijs and Gerhard Hammerschmid Manuscript completed in August 2017 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 ISBN: 978-92-79-90889-7 doi:10.2767/05691 © European Union, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Approach in Public Budgeting: Citizens' Budget1
    Journal of International Education and Leadership Volume 5 Issue 1 Spring 2015 http://www.jielusa.org/ ISSN: 2161-7252 A New Approach in Public Budgeting: Citizens’ Budget1 Semih Bilge Eskişehir Osmangazi University Change and transformation in the understanding and definition of citizenship has led to the emergence of citizen-oriented public service approach. This approach also raised a new term and concept in the field of public budgeting because of the transformation in the processes of public budgeting: citizens’ budget. The citizens’ budget which seeks to ensure participation of the citizens in the budgeting process serves as a tool to ensure that the budget is shared with the public transparently and that the people take part in the budgeting processes. Citizen’s budget is one of the main tools and instruments that the central and local administrations could use to ensure greater transparency and citizenship participation. This study focuses on the concept of citizens’ budget, its goals and principles. In addition, the paper also analyzes the phases of budget-making and the expected outcomes out of the citizen-oriented budgeting. Furthermore, the study, referring to practices of different countries in this field, offers some insights on the citizens’ budget. Keywords: Public Budget, Citizen Centered, Citizen Based Budgeting, Citizens’ Budget 1 Dr. Semih BİLGE, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Department of Public Finance. [email protected] Journal of International Education and Leadership Volume 5 Issue 1 Spring 2015 http://www.jielusa.org/ ISSN: 2161-7252 Major changes in political, social, cultural and satisfaction in all phases of the process (Uysal economic fields led to significant differences Şahin, 2014: 113).
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Theory in the Public Sector
    BUDGET THEORY IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR Aman Khan W. Bartley Hildreth Editors QUORUM BOOKS Budget Theory in the Public Sector BUDGET THEORY IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR Edited by Aman Khan and W. Bartley Hildreth QUORUM BOOKS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Budget theory in the public sector / edited by Aman Khan, and W. Bartley Hildreth. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1–56720–281–0 (alk. paper) 1. Budget. 2. Finance, Public. I. Khan, Aman. II. Hildreth, W. Bartley, 1949– HJ2005.B7978 2002 352.4'8—dc21 2002023030 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright ᭧ 2002 by Aman Khan and W. Bartley Hildreth All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2002023030 ISBN: 1–56720–281–0 First published in 2002 Quorum Books, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.quorumbooks.com Printed in the United States of America TM The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 Dedicated to Marcia Lynn Whicker Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xv 1 Budget Theory for a New Century 1 Lance T. LeLoup 2 Early Budget Theory: The Progressive Theory of Public Expenditures 22 Julia Beckett 3 The Separation of Powers Principle and Budget Decision Making 42 Thomas P. Lauth 4 Nonconventional Budgets: Interpreting Budgets and Budgeting Interpretations 77 Gerald J.
    [Show full text]