DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Summer-Time Arrangements Under Directive 2000/84/EC Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU Summer-Time Arrangements Under Directive 2000/84/EC Study EU summer-time arrangements under Directive 2000/84/EC Ex-post impact assessment EU summer-time arrangements under Directive 2000/84/EC Study On 27 June 2017, the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) requested an ex-post evaluation of Directive 2000/84/EC, which regulates the time change between winter and summer time in the EU. According to the request the evaluation should constitute a follow-up to the joint public hearing on summer time the JURI, ITRE and TRAN committees held on 24 March 2015 and should take into account the most recent research findings regarding the effects of daylight saving time on different aspects of the economy, health and safety. Moreover, it should analyse certain aspects linked to the 'better regulation' initiative. This analysis was prepared in-house by the Ex-Post Evaluation Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, within the European Parliament's Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services. It aims to outline the rationale and application of Directive 2000/84/EC, examines the evidence available in the various areas daylight saving time touches upon and seeks to thereby provide an impartial contribution to the debate. Abstract The purpose of summer time is to capitalise on natural daylight. By turning the clock one hour forward as the days get longer in spring, sunset is delayed by this same hour, until the clock is set back again in autumn. This practice is applied in over 60 countries worldwide. In the EU, Member States draw on a long tradition of daylight saving time (DST), and many have developed their own DST schemes. Harmonisation attempts began in the 1970s, to facilitate the effective operation of the internal market. Today, the uniform EU-wide application of DST is governed by Directive 2000/84/EC; most European third countries have aligned their summer-time schemes with that of the EU. Much academic research has been invested in examining the benefits and inconveniences of DST. It appears that: - summer time benefits the internal market (notably the transport sector) and outdoor leisure activities, and it also generates marginal savings in energy consumption; - the impact on other economic sectors remains largely inconclusive; - with regard to inconveniences, health research associates DST with disruption to the human biorhythm ('circadian rhythm'). EU summer-time arrangements under Directive 2000/84/EC AUTHOR Irmgard Anglmayer, Ex-Post Evaluation Unit ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Ex-Post Evaluation Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, within the Directorate–General for Parliamentary Research Services of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. To contact the Unit, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN This document is available on the internet at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. © European Union, 2017. Manuscript completed in October 2017. Brussels © European Union, 2017. PE 611.006 ISBN: 978-92-846-1998-6 DOI: 10.2861/380995 CAT: QA-05-17-052-EN-N EU summer-time arrangements under Directive 2000/84/EC Table of Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................... 1 1. The EU's summer-time arrangements .......................................................... 2 1.1. The essence of Directive 2000/84/EC ........................................................... 2 1.2. The historical process that led to Directive 2000/84/EC ........................... 2 1.3. The compulsory nature of the Summer-Time Directive ............................ 3 2. Daylight saving time in context ..................................................................... 4 2.1. The original purpose of summer time .......................................................... 4 2.2. International DST observance ........................................................................ 5 2.3. The link between geographical position and time ...................................... 7 2.3.1. Latitude and daylight .............................................................................. 7 2.3.2. Longitude and time zone ........................................................................ 8 2.3.3. The implications of these factors for EU territory ............................... 9 3. Activities of the EU institutions ................................................................... 11 3.1. Commission studies and reports ................................................................. 11 3.2. European Parliament ..................................................................................... 14 3.2.1. Discussion of the directives .................................................................. 14 3.2.2. The public hearing of 24 March 2015: the issues at stake ................. 15 3.2.3. Plenary debates based on oral questions ............................................ 17 4. Member States' views .................................................................................... 17 5. Public opinion ................................................................................................ 18 5.1. Surveys ............................................................................................................ 18 5.2. Petitions and citizens' initiatives .................................................................. 19 6. Sectoral implications of DST: the latest research ....................................... 21 6.1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 21 6.2. Internal market ............................................................................................... 22 6.2.1. Transport ................................................................................................. 23 6.2.2. Communications and commerce ......................................................... 23 6.3. Individual economic sectors ......................................................................... 24 6.3.1. Energy ...................................................................................................... 24 6.3.2. Agriculture .............................................................................................. 25 6.3.3. Leisure, sports and tourism .................................................................. 26 6.4. Health .............................................................................................................. 27 6.5. Safety ............................................................................................................... 28 6.5.1. Road safety .............................................................................................. 28 6.5.2. Public safety and crime ......................................................................... 30 7. EU summer-time arrangements in the light of 'Better Regulation'......... 30 7.1. Impact assessment ......................................................................................... 31 7.2. The internal market and choice of legal basis ............................................ 32 8. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 32 8.1. The effects of the directive by sector ........................................................... 33 8.2. Possible future changes to the current DST regime .................................. 34 Annexes Annex 1: Historical overview of summer-time observance in the EU-28 Annex 2: Comparison of the time of sunrise/sunset in the EU-28 at summer/winter solstice EU summer-time arrangements under Directive 2000/84/EC Executive summary The purpose of summer time is to shift an hour of daylight from the morning to the evening during the summer months to provide more daylight hours after work. Most EU Member States have been applying summer time continuously since the 1970s or 1980s, initially according to their own schedules. To prevent the internal market, and in particular the transport sector, from being hampered by uncoordinated national schedules, summer-time arrangements were gradually harmonised under EU law. This process began in 1975 and was completed in 2001 by means of Directive 2000/84/EC, the ninth Summer-Time Directive. This paper puts summer time – or daylight saving time (DST), as it is commonly referred to – first into context: it recalls the initial purpose of summer time and shows its worldwide observance today. It also explains the variations in the actual effect of DST across EU Member States. Indeed, DST makes more of a difference in the South where the sun sets relatively early in summer (e.g. Greece) than in the North (e.g. Sweden). These differences are due to the relationship between time and daylight on the one hand, and countries' geographical position and choice of time zone on the other. Furthermore, this analysis looks at the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synopsis of the Meeting Held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013
    BUREAU OF THE ASSEMBLY AS/Bur/CB (2013) 01 21 January 2013 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY Synopsis of the meeting held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013 The Bureau of the Assembly, meeting on 21 January 2013 in Strasbourg, with Mr Jean-Claude Mignon, President of the Assembly, in the Chair, as regards: - First part-session of 2013 (Strasbourg, 21-25 January 2013): i. Requests for debates under urgent procedure and current affairs debates: . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold a debate under urgent procedure on “Migration and asylum: mounting tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Migration, Refugees and Displaced Persons for report; . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold the debate under urgent procedure on “Recent developments in Mali and Algeria and the threat to security and human rights in the Mediterranean region” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Political Affairs and Democracy for report; . decided not to hold a current affairs debate on “The deteriorating situation in Georgia”; . took note of the decision by the UEL Group to withdraw its request for a current affairs debate on “Political developments in Turkey regarding the human rights of the Kurds and other minorities”; ii. Draft agenda: updated the draft agenda; - Progress report of the Bureau of the Assembly and of the Standing Committee (5 October 2012 – 21 January 2013): (Rapporteur: Mr Kox, Netherlands, UEL): approved the Progress report; - Election observation: i. Presidential election in Armenia (18 February 2013): took note of the press release issued by the pre-electoral mission (Yerevan, 15-18 January 2013) and approved the final composition of the ad hoc committee to observe these elections (Appendix 1); ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Clock Changes: Is It Time for Change?
    HOUSE OF LORDS European Union Committee 5th Report of Session 2019–21 Clock changes: is it time for change? Ordered to be printed 4 February 2020 and published 11 February 2020 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 15 The European Union Committee The European Union Committee is appointed each session “to scrutinise documents deposited in the House by a Minister, and other matters related to the European Union”. In practice this means that the Select Committee, along with its Sub-Committees, scrutinises the UK Government’s policies and actions in respect to the EU; considers and seeks to influence the development of policies and draft laws proposed by the EU institutions; and more generally represents the House of Lords in its dealings with the EU institutions and other Member States. The six Sub-Committees are as follows: Energy and Environment Sub-Committee External Affairs Sub-Committee Financial Affairs Sub-Committee Home Affairs Sub-Committee Internal Market Sub-Committee Justice Sub-Committee Membership The Members of the European Union Select Committee are: Baroness Brown of Cambridge Lord Kerr of Kinlochard Lord Ricketts Lord Cavendish of Furness Earl of Kinnoull (Chairman) Lord Sharkey Baroness Couttie Lord Lamont of Lerwick Lord Teverson Baroness Donaghy Lord Morris of Aberavon Baroness Verma Lord Faulkner of Worcester Baroness Neville-Rolfe Lord Wood of Anfield Baroness Hamwee Lord Oates Lord Jay of Ewelme Baroness Primarolo The Members of the EU Internal Market Sub-Committee, which conducted this inquiry, are: Lord Berkeley Lord Lansley Lord Russell of Liverpool Lord Carter of Coles Lord Lilley Lord Shipley Baroness Donaghy (Chairman) Lord Mountevans Lord Vallance of Tummel Baroness Kramer Baroness Prashar Lord Wigley Lord Lamont of Lerwick Lord Robathan Further information Publications, press notices, details of membership, forthcoming meeting and other information is available at http://www.parliament.uk/hleu.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject List
    (Distributed to the £ 250 1923. Members of the Council.) Geneva, April 26th, 1923. LEAGUE OF NATIONS SUBJECT LIST OF Documents distributed to the Members of the Council DURING THE YEAR 1922. (PREPARED BY THE DISTRIBUTION BRANCH) LEAGUE OF NATIONS SUBJECT LIST OF Documents distributed to the Members of the Council during the Year 1922. (Prepared by the Distribution Branch) A ALAND ISLANDS Convention concluded October 1921 at Geneva regarding non­ fortification and neutralisation of (C.419. M. 300.1921.) Letter dated April 13, 1922, from Secretary-General to States Members forwarding, on its coming into force C. L. 34. 1922 Note dated November 1922 by Secretary-General notifying Czechoslovakian Government's agreement to respect Officiai Journal, 3rd Year, No. 11, Part I, p. 1123. Ratification of Note dated September 1922 by Secretary-General giving, up to date, position of Official Journal, 3rd Year, No. 10, p. 1089. Report dated January 1922 by British Representative (Mr. Harmsworth) and resolution adopted at 16th Council Session agreeing to accept obligations provided for in Article 7 of, and requesting Secretary-General to forward this Convention to States Members, on its coming into force C. 37. M. 16. 1922. VII. ACCOUNTS, AUDITED See : Finances, League Budget, League ADMISSIONS TO LEAGUE Hungary Letter dated May 23, 1921, from Hungarian Government (Count Banffy) requesting admission A. 11. 1922. VII. A. 5. 1921. VII. Letter dated August 8, 1922, from Hungarian Govern­ ment (Count Bethlen) designating Count Banffy to under­ take necessary negotiations in connection with admission of A. 18. 1922. Letter dated September 18, 1922, from Hungarian Govern­ ment (Count Banffy) regarding certain questions raised in speech of Czechoslovak Delegate (M.
    [Show full text]
  • News from Ukraine
    March, 2013 NEWS FROM UKRAINE Rada to adopt EU-recommended bills on data protection, combating discrimination, says speaker The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will approve the draft laws on amendments to the laws on personal data protection and countering discrimination that was recommended by the European Union, Verkhovna Rada Chairman Volodymyr Rybak has said. “There are several key issues that need to be addressed as soon as possible. In particular, these are the legal regulation of the fight against corruption, and the introduction of the EU-recommended amendments to Ukraine’s laws in the field of personal data protection and combating discrimination,” Mr. Rybak stated at a meeting of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Seimas of Lithuania, the Sejm and Senate of Poland in Warsaw on 26 March. Mr. Rybak said the Verkhovna Rada has already adopted most of the laws that are needed to implement the first stage of the action plan on the liberalization of the EU visa regime with Ukraine. In particular, the Parliament passed the laws dealing with the issues related to migration, a resolution to introduce biometric travel documents. Besides, a system of personal data protection was created in Ukraine. According to the Ukrainian Parliament’s Chair, Ukraine plans to submit to the European side soon its third report on the implementation of the first stage of the visa liberalization action plan, which would give the EU grounds to switch to the second stage. Read more: Interfax Ukraine, 26 March 2013 http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/146376.html#.UVGP7DesZVQ Ukrainian Parliament ratifies visa facilitation agreement with EU Some 275 of the 350 MPs registered in the parliamentary sitting hall supported the Law “On the Ratification of the Amended Visa Facilitation Agreement between Ukraine and the EU”.
    [Show full text]
  • CYPRUS EU RESIDENCY PROGRAMME Cyprus Residency
    CYPRUS EU RESIDENCY PROGRAMME Cyprus Residency CAPITAL CITY LANGUAGES Nicosia Greek, Turkish, English TIME ZONE CURRENCY Eastern European Time Zone Euro € (UTC+02:00) POPULATION TOTAL AREA 1,170,13 9,512 km² EU TRAVEL NEAREST COUNTRY No restrictions Lebanon, 264 km www.cclex.com/citizenship CYPRUS LEGAL BASIS FOR THE CYPRUS YELLOW SLIP Situated in the North East of the Mediterranean, Cyprus is one of the largest islands in Europe offering the comfort of a PROGRAMME Mediterranean lifestyle and the stability of a European country – factors which have attracted many families and retirees alike. The Yellow Slip is granted by virtue of The Right of Union Citizens Cyprus has been a Member of the European Union since May and their Family Members to Move and Reside Freely within the 2004, and a Eurozone Member since January 2008. Territory of the Republic of Cyprus Law of 2007, (ANNEX III, Article 12(1). The ‘Yellow Slip’ is available to EU citizens wishing to settle and work in Cyprus permanently without the need to renew. Non- EU dependents may also be included in the application and thus being eligible to benefit from the same rights as EU citizens. BENEFITS OF THE CYPRUS YELLOW SLIP PROGRAMME € Fast Process Safe and Secure; Lowest Quality Education & Dependents Valid for Life Cost Effective Crime Levels in the EU Healthcare are Eligible Programme Fee ELIGIBILITY FOR THE CYPRUS YELLOW SLIP The Yellow Slip is open to all EU nationals, and paves the way for Non-EU family members to obtain the right to stay and work in Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizer Co-Organizers International Programming
    ORGANIZER SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL UNION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING BULGARIA “INDUSTRY 4.0” CO-ORGANIZERS Federation of the Scientific-Technical Unions in Bulgaria Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Technical University, Sofia Sofia University „St. Kliment Ohridski” University of National and World Economy, Sofia Technical University, Varna Technical University, Gabrovo Ruse University „Angel Kanchev” „Todor Kableshkov” University of Transport, Sofia University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia University of Mining and Geology „St. Ivan Rilski”, Sofia University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Sofia Plovdiv University „Paisii Hilendarski” „St. Cyril and St. Methodius” University, Veliko Turnovo „D. A. Tsenov” Academy of Economics, Svishtov New Bulgarian University, Sofia „Vasil Levski” National Military University, Veliko Turnovo Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia Society of Polish Mechanical Engineers and Technicians (SIMP) Association of Mechanical Engineers, Slovakia Association of Mechanical Engineers, Czech Republic Union of Metallurgists, North Macedonia Higher Education Academy of Sciences, Ukraine Union of Mechanical Engineers, Ukraine Scientific-Technical Association, China Ufa State Aviation Technical University, Russia Association for promotion of innovative technologies - InnovativeFET, Croatia Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering-Poznan, Poland INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE Co-Chairs: Prof. D.Sc. Georgi Popov, DHC, Prof. Dr. Dr. Jivka Ovtcharova, DHC, Technical University of Sofia, BG Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, DE Members: Acad. Igor Bychkov Institute for System Dynamics and Control Theory SB RAS RU Cor. member Alexey Beliy National Academy of Sciences of Belarus BY Cor. member Svetozar Margenov Bulgarian Academy of Science BG Prof. Alexander Afanasyev Institute for Information Transmission Problems RU Prof. Alexander Guts Omsk State University RU Prof. Andrzej Golabczak Technical University of Lodz PL Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy
    INTER-PARLIAMENTARY CONFERENCE FOR THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY AND THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY 4–6 September 2013 Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Vilnius DRAFT PROGRAMME 4 September, Wednesday Arrival of the participants 15.00–19.00 Check-in at hotels Meeting of the Presidency Trio and representatives of the European Parliament 17.30 Departure from hotels for the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 18.00–19.00 Meeting of the Presidency Trio (Ireland/Lithuania/Greece) and representatives of the European Parliament Venue: Presidential Hall, Building 1 of the Seimas Departure from the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania for the Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania 19.30 Departure from hotels for the Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania 20.00 Dinner hosted by Mr Artūras PAULAUSKAS, Chair of the Seimas Committee on National Security and Defence Venue: Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania, Katedros a. 4, Vilnius 22.30 Return to hotels Gedimino pr. 53, LT-01109 Vilnius, LITHUANIA Tel. + 370 5 239 6762 E-mail [email protected] 2 5 September, Thursday 8.30 Departure of the participants of the Working Group of the Ad Hoc Review Committee from hotels for the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 9.00–10.00 Meeting of the Working Group of the Ad Hoc Review Committee Venue: Meeting Room of the Committee on European Affairs, Building 1 of the Seimas 9.30 Departure of the participants of the meeting of the Ad Hoc Review Committee from hotels for the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 10.00–11.00 Meeting of the Ad Hoc Review Committee Venue: Meeting Room of the Committee on European Affairs, Building 1 of the Seimas 11.00–12.00 Meetings of political groups 11.00 Departure of other participants from hotels for the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 11.30–12.00 Registration (for those non-registered yet) Venue: Building 1 of the Seimas Opening Session 12.00–12.15 Opening remarks by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council TRANS/1999/4 30 November 1998 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE (Sixty-first session, 8-11 February 1999, agenda item 12(c)) APPLICATION OF SUMMER TIME Note by the secretariat Introduction 1. Commission decisions concerning this subject appear in annexes 1-4. 2. Comments made and decisions taken within the framework of the fifty- second session of the Working Party on Rail Transport (5-7 October 1998) and the sixtieth session of the Inland Transport Committee (12-16 January 1998) are reproduced below. Inland Transport Committee 3. At its sixtieth session, the Committee learned from the representative of the European Commission that, according to the Eighth Directive of the European Parliament (EP) and of the EU Council (22 July 1997), a harmonized beginning and end of summer time had been determined in the European Union for the years 1998 to 2001, i.e. the last Sunday in March and the last Sunday in October. Please note that the distribution of documentation for the Inland Transport Committee (ITC) is no longer "restricted". Accordingly, the secretariat has adopted a new numbering system whereby all working documents will be numbered as follows: TRANS/year/serial number. Reports, provisional agendas, resolutions and major publications will continue to follow the previous numbering system (i.e. ECE/TRANS/124). GE.98- TRANS/1999/4 page 3 4. Bearing in mind the advantages of common dates for the application of summer time for ECE member countries, the Committee, supporting the position of the Working Party, urged Governments to ensure also in future a harmonized beginning and end of summer time in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments for Democracy: Towards More Ambitious Global Cooperation
    2 October 2013 MEETING OF THE CHAIRPERSONS OF THE COMMITTEES ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF PARLIAMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE PARLIAMENTARY FORUM FOR DEMOCRACY Parliaments for democracy: towards more ambitious global cooperation 27-28 November 2013 Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Vilnius DRAFT PROGRAMME Wednesday, 27 November Arrival of the participants 15.00–19.30 Registration at the hotels 19.30 Departure by bus from the hotels for the Museum of Applied Arts 20.00–22.30 Dinner hosted by Prof Benediktas JUODKA, Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Venue: Museum of Applied Arts, Arsenalo g. 3, Vilnius 22.30 Return to the hotels by bus Thursday, 28 November 8.00 Departure by bus from the hotels for the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 8.00–8.30 Registration of participants (for those who have not registered yet) Venue: Lobby, Building II of the Seimas Gedimino pr. 53, LT-01109 Vilnius, LITHUANIA Tel. + 370 5 239 6762 E-mail [email protected] 2 OPENING SESSION Venue: Hall of the Act of March 11, Building I of the Seimas 8.30–8.40 Opening address by Prof Benediktas JUODKA, Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 8.40–8.50 Opening address by Mr Emanuelis ZINGERIS, Chair of the Parliamentary Forum for Democracy 8.50–9.00 Welcome address by Mr Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS, Deputy Speaker of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Adoption of the agenda SESSION 1 THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN PARTNERSHIP: TOWARDS MORE AMBITIOUS GLOBAL COOPERATION Chaired by
    [Show full text]
  • Signatures of the Participants of the Convening Meeting
    Parliamentary Forum for Democracy Signatures of the participants of the Convening Meeting: 1. Irena Degutienė, Speaker of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 2. Mihai Ghimpu, Acting President of the Republic of Moldova; Chairman of the Parliament of Moldova; 3. Michal Tomasz Kaminski, Member of European Parliament, Poland; 4. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, Member of U.S. Congress; 5. Tadeusz Iwiński, Member of the Sejm; 6. Dennis Hastert, Former Speaker of U.S. House Representatives; Senior Advisor, Dickstein Shapiro LLP; 7. David Bakradze, Chairman of the Parliament, Georgia; 8. Alexandr Vondra, Senator, Czech Republic; 9. Adriana Gonzalez Carrillo, Senator, Mexico; 10. Vytautas Landsbergis, Member of the European Parliament, Lithuania; 11. Česlovas Vytautas Stankevičius, Deputy Speaker of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 12. Ion Hadârcă, Member of Parliament, Moldova; 13. Karel Schwarzenberg, Senator, Czech Republic; 14. Emanuelis Zingeris, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs; 15. Vilija Aleknaitė-Abramikienė, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 16. Petras Auštrevičius, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 17. Marija Aušrinė Pavilionienė, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 18. Auksutė Ramanauskaitė-Skokauskienė, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 19. Petras Luomanas, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 20. Vladimír Dryml, Senator, Czech Republic; 21. Pat Breen, Member of Parliament, Ireland; 1 22. Mantas Adomėnas, Member of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania; 23. David Darchiashvili, Member of Parliament, Georgia; 24. Olha Bodnar, Member of Parliament, Ukraine; 25. Borys Tarasyuk, Member of Parliament, Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on European Integration, Ukraine; 26.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL of EUROPE CONSEIL DE L'europe COMMITTEE of MINISTERS CONFIDENTIAL CM/Del/Concl(79)
    COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L'EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS CONFIDENTIAL CM/Del/Concl(79)312 CONCLUSIONS OF THE 312th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES HELD IN STRASBOURG FROM 10 TO 14 DECEMBER 1979 STRASBOURG CONFIDENTIAL - i - CM/Del/Concl(79)312 SUMMARY Page 1. Adoption of the agenda 5 2. State of written procedures 7 Political and General Policy Questions 3. Committee of Ministers - Follow-up to the 65th Session 9 4. 2nd Medium-Term Plan 13 5. Situation in Cyprus 21 6. Missing political prisoners in Chile - Recommendation 868 and Order No. 381 23 7. Action taken on Assembly Recommendations and on relations with the Committee of Ministers - Recommendation 871 and Order No. 383 25 Human Rights 8. Ad hoc Committee of Experts for the Follow-up to the Declaration on Human Rights (CAHDH) - Report 27 9. Election of 5 Judges to the European Court of Human Rights (in respect of Denmark, France, Ireland, Iceland and Switzerland) - Nomination of candidates 29 10. European Commission of Human Rights - Election of a member in respect of Spain 31 11. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Airey case - Application of Article 54 of the European Convention on Human Rights 33 CONFIDENTIAL CM3del/Concl(79)312 - ii - Page Legal Questions 12. Conventions and Agreements concluded within the framework of the Council of Europe - Model final clauses 35 13. Terrorism in Europe - Recommendation 852 39 14. Peaceful settlement of disputes - Recommendation 878 45 Economic and Social Questions 15. Steering Committee for Social Security (CDSS) - Report of the 8th meeting (Athens, 25-28 September 1979) 49 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Discontinuing Seasonal Changes of Time
    Discontinuing Seasonal Changes of Time RoSPA’s Response to House of Lords EU Internal Market Sub-Committee Date: August 2019 The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents Response to House of Lords EU Internal Market Sub-Committee, Discontinuing Seasonal Changes of Time Introduction This is the response of The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) to the House of Lords EU Internal Market Sub-Committee’s call for evidence on discontinuing seasonal changes of time. It has been produced following consultation with RoSPA’s National Road Safety Committee. EU summertime legislation requires Member States to begin summertime arrangements on the last Sunday of March and end them on the last Sunday of October. On 13 September 2018, the European Commission published a proposal to replace the obligation to apply seasonal changes of time with an obligation to discontinue this practice and observe winter- or summer-time throughout the year. The choice of permanent winter- or summer- time will be at the discretion of each Member State. If the Directive is adopted and it has a transposition deadline that falls within the period in which the UK is still a Member State or in a transition period, the UK will be required to end seasonal changes of time and choose between applying permanent winter- or summer-time. However, if the Directive is adopted and it has a transposition deadline day after exit day, and the UK has no obligation to continue applying EU law, the UK will be faced with the choice of maintaining seasonal changes or time or abolishing them in line with its EU neighbours.
    [Show full text]