DOCSLIB.ORG

The Young Van Dyck's Fingerprint: a Technical Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Young Van Dyck's Fingerprint: a Technical Approach Harth et al. Herit Sci (2017) 5:22 DOI 10.1186/s40494-017-0136-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The young Van Dyck’s fngerprint: a technical approach to assess the authenticity of a disputed painting Astrid Harth1,2* , Geert Van der Snickt3, Olivier Schalm2, Koen Janssens3 and Griet Blanckaert2 Abstract The painting Saint Jerome, part of the collection of the Maagdenhuis Museum (Antwerp, Belgium), is attributed to the young Anthony van Dyck (1613–1621) with reservations. The painting displays remarkable compositional and iconographic similarities with two early Van Dyck works (1618–1620) now in Museum Boijmans van Beuningen (Rot- terdam) and Nationalmuseum (Stockholm). Despite these similarities, previous art historical research did not result in a clear attribution to this master. In this study, the work’s authenticity as a young Van Dyck painting was assessed from a technical perspective by employing a twofold approach. First, technical information on Van Dyck’s materials and techniques, here identifed as his fngerprint, were defned based on a literature review. Second, the materials and techniques of the questioned Saint Jerome painting were characterized by using complementary imaging techniques: infrared refectography, X-ray radiography and macro X-ray fuorescence scanning. The insights from this non-invasive research were supplemented with analysis of a limited number of cross-sections by means of feld emission scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that the ques- tioned painting’s materials and techniques deviate from Van Dyck’s fngerprint, thus making the authorship of this master very unlikely. Keywords: Anthony van Dyck, Saint Jerome, Attribution problems, IRR, XRR, MA-XRF scanning, FE-SEM-EDX Background representing the master’s entire career, is necessary [6, Over the past decades, technical study of artworks has 7]. Hence, the assessment of attribution problems from become increasingly important to address attribution a technical perspective has to be twofold. First, a master’s problems. Both the scarcity of documentary evidence fngerprint has to be defned either by studying a relevant about Old Masters’ art production as well as their ubiq- corpus of artworks and/or by collecting this information uitous practice of copying and stylistic imitation have from literature. Second, the goal is to characterize the prompted art historians to search for clues in the paint disputed painting’s materials and techniques and bench- itself [1, 2]. Although imaging and analytical tools have mark these with the acquired fngerprint. opened up new research avenues to re-evaluate accepted In this article, we investigated a specifc attribution attributions and assess questionable attributions, con- problem by adopting said twofold approach on a con- ducting technical research to address attribution prob- tended Van Dyck painting, depicting Saint Jerome with lems remains challenging [3–5]. In order to avoid an angel (Fig. 1a). Tis work entered the collection of premature conclusions, a substantial body of refer- the Antwerp Maagdenhuis Museum in 1884. Te paint- ence information on painters’ materials and techniques, ing is characterized by a stirring history of attributions; it has been alternately linked to the seventeenth-century *Correspondence: [email protected] Antwerp masters Adam van Noort, Peter Paul Rubens, 1 Department of Art, Music and Theatre Sciences, Ghent University - Gaspar de Crayer and Anthony van Dyck [8]. Today, the Research Foundation Flanders, St‑Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium painting is ascribed to the young Van Dyck with reser- Full list of author information is available at the end of the article vations based on an earlier ascription made by Lodewijk © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Harth et al. Herit Sci (2017) 5:22 Page 2 of 13 Fig. 1 Composite image of the three Saint Jerome paintings with stylistic and iconographic afnities, accompanied by a timeline indicating Van Dyck’s four working periods; a the painting under study: Anthony van Dyck (attributed to), Saint Jerome, 1613–1621, oil on canvas, 148 108 cm, × Maagdenhuis Museum, Antwerp, photograph by Oswald Pauwels, Artesis Hogeschool, with annotation of three sample locations; b Anthony van Dyck, Saint Jerome with an Angel, 1618–1620, oil on canvas, 165 130 cm, Boijmans van Beuningen, Rotterdam; c Anthony van Dyck, Saint Jerome × with an Angel, 1618–1620, oil on canvas, 167 154 cm, Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, photograph by Erik Cornelius, Nationalmuseum (CC BY SA) × Philippen in 1933 [9]. Anthony van Dyck (1599–1641) quality. Because in-depth stylistic research was ruled out, was an Antwerp Baroque painter, who had a short but technical examination was anticipated to ofer new possi- prolifc international career working in Flanders, Italy bilities for the evaluation of the painting’s authenticity as and England [10]. Philippen identifed the artwork as by being a work by the young Anthony van Dyck. the hand of this master based on its signifcant icono- graphic and compositional resemblances with two early Experimental authentic paintings (Fig. 1b, c). Te uncommon icono- Te disputed painting’s materials and techniques were graphic subject recalls Van Dyck’s artistic production studied by combining imaging and analytical methods. during his formative years in Antwerp, the so-called First Te composition and structure of the painting’s canvas Antwerp Period (1613–1621). In fact, based on his sur- support were characterized through visual observation viving oeuvre, Van Dyck was only then fascinated by this of the weave pattern and thread density, and observa- unusual iconographic theme, while, during his following tion of the textile fbers by optical microscopy (OM). working periods in Italy (1621–1627), Flanders (1627– Te underdrawing was revealed with IRR. Te paint lay- 1632), and England (1632–1641) (see Fig. 1), the artist ers’ structural and compositional aspects were studied never seemed to return to the Saint Jerome with an angel non-invasively with XRR, IRR and MA-XRF. Te paint/ [10–12]. ground layer sequence and the separate chemical com- Currently, the absence of documentary evidence on the position of the diferent strata were further characterized painting’s provenance and its problematic state of pres- through analysis and study of three cross-sectioned sam- ervation impedes art historical research to evaluate the ples by means of OM and FE-SEM-EDX. artwork’s questioned attribution to the young Van Dyck. Particularly, the physical alterations of the paint surface Infrared refectography (IRR) mainly caused by discolored varnish, retouches and over- Infrared refectograms were acquired with a commercial paints as well as over-cleaning areas and paint losses, OSIRIS infrared camera, manufactured by Opus Instru- made it difcult to discern the artwork’s original artistic ments (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Te OSIRIS was Harth et al. Herit Sci (2017) 5:22 Page 3 of 13 equipped with an InGaAs array sensor operating at wave- of 45 kV with a current of 200 μA, a dwell time of 200 ms lengths from 900 to 1700 nm, and object resolution down and a step size 850 µm. Te entire picture plan was to 0.05 mm [13]. Te painting was recorded with a cam- scanned in six experiments, each scanned area measur- era-object distance of 133 cm, a focal length of 28 mm, ing 56 × 51 cm and each scan taking 24 h. Te elemental an f/22 diaphragm and illuminated with two 300 W distribution maps were obtained by using in-house writ- Halogen lamps. Te entire picture surface was imaged in ten Datamuncher software of the AXES group (Univer- six recordings of 4096 × 4096 pixels each. In Adobe Pho- sity of Antwerp) [14]. toshop CS5®, the recorded images were fnally stitched with Photomerge and the resulting image’s legibility was Optical microscopy (OM) and feld emission scanning enhanced by histogram correction and the application of electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X‑ray the flter Unsharp Mask. spectroscopy (FE‑SEM‑EDX) For the study of the paint stratigraphy, composition X‑ray radiography (XRR) and morphology of the ground layer(s), samples smaller Radiographic images were produced at the Royal Insti- than 1 mm2 were extracted with a medical scalpel from tute for Cultural Heritage (KIK/IRPA, Brussels). An areas already damaged and loosened. In total, three air-cooled X-ray tube Baltospot LLX110-DA-1 (Balteau samples were obtained from Saint Jerome’s left foot, NDT, Hermalle-sous-argenteau, Belgium) was placed in red drapery and the blue sky (locations S1, S2 and S3 front of the painting and the transmitted X-rays were col- are shown in Fig. 1a). Te samples were embedded in lected on X-ray polyester flms (Agfa Structurix D4). For Technovit® 2000 LC, a fast light-curing methacrylate this painting, a tube voltage of 50 kV, a tube current of based resin, and hardened by UV-light in the Tech- 12 mA, an exposure time of 480 s, and a distance between notray CU light curing device (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, source and X-ray flms of 6 m were used. Wehrheim, Germany). Te polymerized block of syn- thetic resin was mechanically polished with the Buehler Macro X‑ray fuorescence scanning (MA‑XRF) Phoenix Alfa® grinder equipped with a Vector power Te MA-XRF scanning instrument consisted of an head (Buehler, Illinois, USA). First, the cross-sectioned X-Beam Powerfux X-ray tube (XOS, New York, USA) samples were documented with the optical microscope with Mo-anode and a Vortex EX- 90 SDD detector Olympus BX 41 (Olympus America Inc., New York, (Hitachi High-Technologies Corpon, Chiyoda, Tokyo, USA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Black Tronies in Seventeenth-Century Flemish Art and the African Presence
    tronies BlackBernadette van Haute* in seventeenth-century Flemish art and the African presence * Bernadette van Haute is Associate the Maghreb cannot have been very numerous Professor in the Department of Art History, in Antwerp at that time, and it may be that Visual Arts and Musicology at the University all three masters [Rubens, Van Dyck and of South Africa. Jordaens] used the same model’. More recently Kolfin (2008:78) made a similar statement: Abstract Having a genuine black model at one’s disposal must have been a great event In this article I examine the production of artistically speaking. ... at least two other tronies or head studies of people of African painters from Rubens’ circle made oil origin made by the Flemish artists Peter Paul sketches of this man which seem to have Rubens, Anthony van Dyck, Jan I Brueghel, been inspired by Rubens’ study heads: Jacob Jordaens and Gaspar de Crayer in an Jacob Jordaens ... around 1620 and attempt to uncover their use of Africans1 as Gaspar de Crayer ... in the mid-1620s. models. In order to contextualise the research, Although Jordaens’ studies are definitely of the actual presence of Africans in Flanders the same man, this is harder to ascertain in the case of De Crayer’s work. is investigated. Although no documentation exists to calculate even an approximate Adding to this point of view, Massing (2011:1) number of Africans living in Flanders at that states that Rubens painted the same person time, travel accounts of foreigners visiting four times in the Brussels painting, ‘suggesting the commercial city of Antwerp testify that people of African origin were still rare in to its cosmopolitan character.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius S. Held Papers, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3g50355c No online items Finding aid for the Julius S. Held papers, ca. 1921-1999 Isabella Zuralski. Finding aid for the Julius S. Held 990056 1 papers, ca. 1921-1999 Descriptive Summary Title: Julius S. Held papers Date (inclusive): ca. 1918-1999 Number: 990056 Creator/Collector: Held, Julius S (Julius Samuel) Physical Description: 168 box(es)(ca. 70 lin. ft.) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles 90049-1688 [email protected] URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/askref (310) 440-7390 Abstract: Research papers of Julius Samuel Held, American art historian renowned for his scholarship in 16th- and 17th-century Dutch and Flemish art, expert on Peter Paul Rubens, Anthony van Dyck, and Rembrandt. The ca. 70 linear feet of material, dating from the mid-1920s to 1999, includes correspondence, research material for Held's writings and his teaching and lecturing activities, with extensive travel notes. Well documented is Held's advisory role in building the collection of the Museo de Arte de Ponce in Puerto Rico. A significant portion of the ca. 29 linear feet of study photographs documents Flemish and Dutch artists from the 15th to the 17th century. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in English Biographical / Historical Note The art historian Julius Samuel Held is considered one of the foremost authorities on the works of Peter Paul Rubens, Anthony van Dyck, and Rembrandt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drawings of Cornelis Visscher (1628/9-1658) John Charleton
    The Drawings of Cornelis Visscher (1628/9-1658) John Charleton Hawley III Jamaica Plain, MA M.A., History of Art, Institute of Fine Arts – New York University, 2010 B.A., Art History and History, College of William and Mary, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art and Architectural History University of Virginia May, 2015 _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: The Life of Cornelis Visscher .......................................................................................... 3 Early Life and Family .................................................................................................................... 4 Artistic Training and Guild Membership ...................................................................................... 9 Move to Amsterdam .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OLD MASTER PAINTINGS Wednesday 9 December 2015
    OLD MASTER PAINTINGS Wednesday 9 December 2015 BONHAMS OLD MASTERS DEPARTMENT Andrew McKenzie Caroline Oliphant Brian Koetser Director, Head of Department, Group Head of Pictures Consultant, London London London London – – – Lisa Greaves Archie Parker Poppy Harvey-Jones Department Director Senior Specialist Junior Specialist London London London – – – Alexandra Frost Mark Fisher Madalina Lazen Administrator, Director, European Paintings, Senior Specialist, European Paintings Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams 1793 Ltd Directors Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No. 4326560 Robert Brooks Co-Chairman, Colin Sheaf Chairman, Jonathan Baddeley, Gordon McFarlan, Andrew McKenzie, London Los Angeles New York Registered Office: Montpelier Galleries Malcolm Barber Co-Chairman, Antony Bennett, Matthew Bradbury, Simon Mitchell, Jeff Muse, Mike Neill, Montpelier Street, London SW7 1HH Colin Sheaf Deputy Chairman, Lucinda Bredin, Harvey Cammell, Simon Cottle, Charlie O’Brien, Giles Peppiatt, Peter Rees, Matthew Girling CEO, Andrew Currie, Paul Davidson, Jean Ghika, Iain Rushbrook, John Sandon, Tim Schofield, – – – +44 (0) 20 7393 3900 Patrick Meade Group Vice Chairman, Charles Graham-Campbell, Miranda Leslie, Veronique Scorer, James Stratton, Roger Tappin, +44 (0) 20 7393 3905 fax Geoffrey Davies, Jonathan Horwich, Richard Harvey, Robin Hereford, Asaph Hyman, Ralph Taylor, Shahin Virani, David Williams, James Knight, Caroline Oliphant. David Johnson, Charles Lanning, Michael Wynell-Mayow, Suzannah Yip. OLD MASTER PAINTINGS Wednesday 9 December 2015, at
    [Show full text]
  • Venite Et Videte
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/28993 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Nagelsmit, Eelco Diederik Title: Venite & videte : art and architecture in Brussels as agents of change during the counter reformation, c. 1609-1659 Issue Date: 2014-10-07 Chapter II – The Calced Carmelites and the Legitimate Use of Images th Decree of the 25 session of the Council of Trent: Moreover, that the images of Christ, of the Virgin Mother of God, and of the other saints, are to be had and retained particularly in temples, and that due honour and veneration are to be given them; not that any divinity, or virtue, is believed to be in them, on account of which they are to be worshipped; or that anything is to be asked of them; or, that trust is to be reposed in images, as was of old done by the Gentiles who placed their hope in idols; but because the honour which is shown them is referred to the prototypes which those images represent; in such wise that by the images which we kiss, and before which we uncover the head, and prostrate ourselves, we adore Christ; and we venerate the saints, whose similitude they bear: as, by the decrees of Councils, and especially of the second Synod of Nicaea, has been defined against the opponents of images.436 In this chapter, I will deal with the high altar of the richly decorated Brussels Carmelite church (fig. 44).437 Although the church and its many artworks were completely destroyed during the French bombardment of Brussels in 1695,438 the appearance of this high altar is passed on in a splendid engraving of 1640 (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • La Colección De Pintura De José De Velasco Y De Su Hermano Juan, Secretario De Ambrosio Espínola
    Recibido en: 12/02/2014 Aceptado en: 23/07/2014 LA COLECCIÓN DE PINTURA DE JOSÉ DE VELASCO Y DE SU HERMANO JUAN, SECRETARIO DE AMBROSIO ESPÍNOLA THE PAINTING COLLECTION OF JOSEPH AND JOHN OF VELASCO, SECRETARY OF AMBROGIO SPINOLA MIGUEL ÁNGEL ARAMBURU-ZABALA HIGUERA y AURELIO Á. BARRÓN GARCÍA Universidad de Cantabria Resumen Juan de Velasco, secretario personal de Espínola y secretario real desde 1618, reunió, junto a su hermano José de Velasco, una considerable colección de pinturas que acabó en Logroño. Se conservan los retratos de ambos hermanos, que adjudicamos a Gaspar de Crayer, y otros cuadros de temática religiosa. Son obras relacionables con Hendrick de Clerck y otros pintores de Bruselas y Amberes. Palabras clave Pintura flamenca. Retrato. Pintura religiosa. Siglo XVII. Gaspar de Crayer. Hendrick de Clerck. Otto van Veen. Ambrosio Espínola. Bruselas. Logroño. Abstract John of Velasco, personal secretary of Ambrogio Spinola and Royal Secretary since 1618, brought -together with his brother Joseph of Velasco- a substantial collection of paintings that ended up in Logroño. The portraits of both brothers -ascribed by us to Gaspar de Crayer-, as well as other religious-themed paintings, have been preserved. These works are related to those of Hendrick de Clerck and other painters from Brussels and Antwerp. Keywords Flemish painting. Portrait. Religious painting. 17th century. Gaspar de Crayer. Hendrick de Clerck. Otto van Veen. Ambrogio Spinola. Brussels. Logroño. La historiografía reciente acerca de las relaciones entre España y los Países Bajos en la época archiducal ha puesto en evidencia el papel desempeñado por las personas que actuaban como “agentes” formales e informales de estas rela- BSAA arte LXXX (2014), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Portraits of the Prince Ladislas-Sigismund Vasa from the Collections in Wawel Castle Re-Examined
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki, tom XXXVII PAN WDN, 2012 KATARZYNA KRZYŻAGÓRSKA-PISAREK INDEPENDENT ART HISTORIAN LONDON TWO PORTRAITS OF THE PRINCE LADISLAS-SIGISMUND VASA FROM THE COLLECTIONS IN WAWEL CASTLE RE-EXAMINED INTRODUCTION This article aims to re-evaluate the existing evidence concerning the attribution and provenance of the two portraits of the Polish Prince Ladislas-Sigismund (1595–1648), later King Ladislas IV, formerly ascribed to the Flemish master Peter Paul Rubens, and now to his workshop and his school or circle respectively. Both pictures are at present in the Wawel Castle in Cracow, and are the two most important works associated with Rubens and his studio in Poland. As both paintings originally came from British collection, so they might benefit from being reviewed from this perspective. The first one is a half-length (to the knees) portrait on long-term loan from the Metropolitan Museum, New York1, described there as workshop of Peter Paul Rubens, Ladislas-Sigismund IV, King of Poland, c. 1624, oil on canvas, 49¼ ϋ 39¾ in. or 125.1 ϋ 101 cm, Inv. n. 29.100.13 (fig. 1). The second one is a full-length equestrian portrait by the school or circle of Rubens, Ladislas-Sigismund, Prince of Poland on horseback, after 1624, oil on canvas, 259 ϋ 185.5 cm, Wawel Castle, Cracow, State Collection of Art, Inv. n. 6320 (fig. 3). Later known as King Ladislas IV, the Polish Prince was the son of the King Sigismund III Vasa and his first wife Anne of Austria (1573–1598), also known as Anna Habsburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Schilderijen
    Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Sint-Pietersabdijkerk – Gent Schilderijen Oktober 2018 Schilderijen in de Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Sint-Pieterskerk – Gent Van waar komen de schilderijen in onze kerk? Een stukje geschiedenis. De 16de eeuw, zwarte bladzijde in de geschiedenis van de Sint-Pietersabdij! De beeldstormers lieten in 1566 een 1ste spoor van vernieling achter, maar het ergste moest nog ko- men. Op bevel van de Gentse schepen Jan van Hembyse werd de abdij in 1578 geplunderd en wat erger was, bijna volledig met de grond gelijk gemaakt. Na het Calvinistisch geweld begon men met nieuwe moed aan de heropbouw zodat in het begin van de 18de eeuw terug een nieuwe barokkerk en abdij waren opgetrokken. De hervormer uit Oostenrijk, Jozef II (1765-1790), liet de monniken, wonder boven wonder, met rust en die leefden dan ook in peis en vree tot aan de Franse inval in ons contreien. Onze ‘bevrijders van het Oostenrijkse juk’ die gekomen waren om ons "Liberté-Egalité-Fraternité" te brengen vonden er geen graten in onze contreien onmiddellijk te belasten met een som van 60 miljoen frank, te betalen binnen de acht dagen. Gent moest zeven miljoen opbrengen waarvan de St.- Pietersabdij, op haar beurt, één miljoen moest bijpassen. Bij niet betalen binnen de gestelde tijd kwa- men er, per dag, 50.000 fr. bij en werden er, dagelijks, tien gijzelaars naar Frankrijk gezonden. Als er niets meer uit de stadskas te halen was voerde men op 15 fructidor jaar IV (1 september 1796) ook in België de wet op de afschaffing en verkoop van geestelijke instellingen in.
    [Show full text]
  • HNA November 2017 Newsletter
    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 34, No. 2 November 2017 Peter Paul Rubens, Centaur Tormented by Peter Paul Rubens, Ecce Homo, c. 1612. Cupid. Drawing after Antique Sculpture, State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg 1600/1608. Wallraf-Richartz-Museum, © The State Hermitage Museum, Cologne © Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln St. Petersburg 2017 Exhibited in Peter Paul Rubens: The Power of Transformation. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, October 17, 2017 – January 21, 2018 Städel Museum, Frankfurt, February 8 – May 21, 2018. HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art www.hnanews.org E-Mail: [email protected] Historians of Netherlandish Art Offi cers President – Paul Crenshaw (2017-2021) Providence College Department of Art History 1 Cummingham Square Providence RI 02918-0001 Vice-President – Louisa Wood Ruby (2017-2021) The Frick Collection and Art Reference Library 10 East 71 Street New York NY 10021 Treasurer – David Levine Southern Connecticut State University 501 Crescent Street New Haven CT 06515 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Seminarstrasse 7 D-55127 Mainz Germany Contents President's Message .............................................................. 1 In Memoriam ......................................................................... 2 Board Members Personalia ............................................................................... 4 Arthur
    [Show full text]
  • Download List of Works
    Willem van Mieris, “Perseus & Andromeda” (detail, see cat. no. 35) GALERIE LOWET DE WOTRENGE Agents & Dealers in Fine Art Northern Works on Paper | 1550 to 1800 February 24 - March 25, 2018 Cover image: Cornelis Schut, “Apollo and Daphne” (detail; see cat no. 29) Gerrit Pietersz, “Phaeton asking Apollo for his chariot” (detail, see cat. no. 31) The current selection of works on paper - ranging from ‘première pensées’ and studies in pencil or ink to highly finished works of art in their own right - was gathered over a period of several years, culminating in this selling exhibition, opening at the gallery in the spring of 2018. In the course of these past years, a number of works on paper that would have made great additions to the current exhibition have found their way to various private and institutional clients. I thank all of them (you know who you are!) for putting their trust in my expertise. The works illustrated in this catalogue have now been gathered at our premises for the show, but I trust many of the sheets will also find their way into various collections across the globe soon. In that case, this catalogue will have to do as a humble memento of this particular moment in time. This selection of ‘northern’ works includes mostly works by Dutch and Flemish artists, with the occasional German thrown in. The division of artists into these geographical ‘schools’ should, however, always be taken with a grain of salt, as most of them were avid travellers - Flemish artists from the sixteenth century onwards viewed the obligatory trip to Italy almost as a pilgrimage - and were continuously being influenced by each other’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • Panels Between Rubens and Van Dyck
    Panels Between Rubens and Van Dyck Gaspar de CRAYER From an artistic background, Gaspar de Crayer was born in Antwerp, in 1584. His father was a schoolmaster, as well as an illuminator and calligrapher. According to historical sources, De Crayer carried out his apprenticeship in Brussels under Raphael Coxie (around 1540-1616), who specialized in history painting and portraits in the Mannerist style. It is unknown at what age he moved from Antwerp to Brussels, home to both the Court and government, which gave him the opportunity to establish his reputation. The artist distinguished himself in two genres – portraiture and religious painting – which were sometimes combined in a single composition. Prolific in his production, his career spanned an impressively long period since he continued painting vast altarpieces into his eighties. His image was immortalized by one of the greatest masters of the 17 th century, Anthony van Dyck (1599-1641). The only known self-portrait is in The Adoration of the Magi , in which De Crayer depicted himself as a gentleman . aaa 1.1 bbb Jacob JORDAENS (Antwerp, 1593-1678), attributed to — Portrait of Gaspar de Crayer Around 1640 Oil on canvas Private collecon Aged around fiy and at the height of his career, De Crayer as immortalised by Anthony van Dyck ho painted this first portrait of the arst, no held in the Prince of Liechtenstein’s collecons ((ienna). The ork presented here is thought to be a copy by ,acob ,ordaens hich remains faithful to (an Dyck’s composion. The poise and bearing of the sub-ect command the observer’s a.enon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bold and the Beautiful
    THE BOLD AND IN FLEMISH PORTRAITS THE BEAUTIFUL This is the booklet accompanying THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL. In Flemish Portraits exhibition project. The exhibition takes place in four locations in the Antwerp city centre, at short, walkable distances from one another: KEIZERSKAPEL MUSEUM SNIJDERS&ROCKOX HOUSE SAINT CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH VLEESHUIS MUSEUM Would you like to discover some more historical locations? An optional walking tour leads you along a number of vestiges of the world of the portrayed and brings you back to the starting point of the exhibition, the Keizerstraat. We hope you will enjoy it! Tickets & info: www.blinddate.vlaanderen © The Phoebus Foundation Chancellery vzw, Antwerp, 2020 D/2020/14.672/2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in an information storage and retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. If you have comments or questions we’d like to hear from you. Contact us at: [email protected] THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL IN FLEMISH PORTRAITS Make-up: Gina Van den Bergh THIS EXHIBITION WAS CREATED BY The Chancellery of The Phoebus Foundation Editor: Guido Verelst Museum Snijders&Rockox House Grader: Kene Illegems — Sound mix: Yves De Mey A Deep Focus production WITH THE SUPPORT OF KBC Group NV Installation: Create Katoen Natie Projections: Visual Creations Indaver — Jan De Nul Group NV MANNEQUINS Isabelle De Borchgrave and Keizerskapel — Saint Charles Borromeo Church REDACTION AND TRANSLATIONS Vleeshuis Museum Luc Philippe & Patrick De Rynck (NL) Saint Paul’s Church Anne Baudouin & Ted Alkins (EN) Royal Academy of Fine Arts Antwerp — University of Antwerp TEXTS Saint James’ Church Hannah Thijs & Buvetex Katrijn Van Bragt — Dr.
    [Show full text]