STATE AGENCY OF WATER RESOURCES UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

MINISTRY OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC AND ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project

Project №: 51081-002 ADB Loan and Grant №: L3746 KGZ(COL) и G0632 KGZ(SF)

Project Implementation Progress Report for I quarter of 2020

N.B.Nabiev PIU Director

Bishkek 2020

1 Оглавление Оглавление STATE AGENCY OF WATER RESOURCES UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC,...... 1 Bishkek 2020...... 1 1. INTRODUCTION...... 2 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, EXPECTED DELIVERABLES...... 2 3. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY FOR REPORTING PERIOD...... 3 4. INFORMATION ON PROCUREMENT...... 9 5. PLANNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM ACHIEVEMENTS, PROJECT ACTIVITY DELIVERABLES AND INDICATORS...... 10 6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES (RESETTLEMENT)...... 10 7. PROJECT FINANCIAL STATUS...... 14 8. LAST ADB MISSION’S ACTION PLAN...... 16 9. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION RELATED ISSUES...... 17 1. APPENDIX. PROJECT DESIGN AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK...... 18 2. APPENDIX. SUBPROJECT SELECTION DESCRIPTION, SELECTION OF DESIGN COMPANY AND FIELD SURVEYS OUTCOMES...... 20 3.APPENDIX. WORKS ON SELECTED SUBPROJECTS FOR PERFORMANCE OF OUTPUT 2...... 42 4. APPENDIX. TABLE OF CONTRACT AWARDS AND DISBURSEMENTS BY YEARS...... 47 5. APPENDIX. NEEDS OF MOES KR FOR ENGINEERING MACHINERY...... 51 6. APPENDIX. OUTCOMES OF THE INVENTORY SURVEY OF GAUGING STATIONS OF KYRGYZHYDROMET UNDER THE MINISTRY OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS WITH IDENTIFICATION OF THE FINAL LIST OF OBSERVATION STATIONS...... 53 7. APPENDIX. PROJECT PROGRAMME...... 79 List of abbreviations

WUA Water users’ associations SAWR State agency of water resources under the GKR RFQ Request for quotations IWS Information Water System PIC Project Implementation Consultant MoES Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Kyrgyz Republic OUS Oblast unit of WUA’ support PIU Project Implementation Unit PP Procurement plan PIS Payment for irrigation services AMP Assets management plan CCD-RWRSP Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project

ITB Invitation to bidders PAM Project Administration Manual RUS Rayon unit of WUA’ support RDWR Rayon directorate for water resources ToR Terms of Reference FM Financial management ERC Emergency response centers of MoES O&M Operation and maintenance

1 State agency of water resources under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and Ministry of emergency situations of the Kyrgyz Republic

Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project

Project Implementation Progress Report for the period completing on 31 March, 2020

1. INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared with purpose to summarize progress results achieved during 1st quarter of 2020.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, EXPECTED DELIVERABLES

Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project is identified as priority project of adaptation to climate change in the Strategic program of the Kyrgyz Republic on adaptation to climate change as of 2017.1

The goal of the project is to improve infrastructure’s resilience to climate changes and disasters as well as water security. By 2026:  Average gross profit of agricultural products will have been grown till $2,350 for hectare on the targeted area of approximately 20,000 ha (basic level for 2017: around $1,900 for hectare);

 Average productivity of water intake will have been increased till 0,85 kg/m3 for wheat and 0,95 kg/m3 for corn on targeted area of approximately 20 000 ha (basic level for 2017: 0,6 kg/m3 for wheat and 0,6 kg/m3 for corn);

 Annual number of households and area of agricultural lands protected and restored from consequences of disasters due to works in the Northern and Southern emergency response centers will have been increased till 50 000 households and 24 000 ha (average annual basic indicator for 2015-2017 years: 20 700 households and 10 700 ha).

The project consists of 3 outputs: Output 1. Irrigation infrastructure modernized. The project will protect and modernize irrigation systems to improve productivity and disaster resilience of about 20 000 hectares of irrigated land. It will upgrade and construct main canals (primary and secondary); lower-level

1 The Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. 2017. The Program of investments connected with climate change. Bishkek. 2 canals (off-farm and on-farm); and associated infrastructure such as protective mudflow crossing structures, cross-regulators and offtakes. Infrastructure design specifications will incorporate disaster risk mitigation measures for future climate conditions. The project will mobilize a participatory planning and design process involving the SAWR, WUAs, WUA subgroups, and other key stakeholders to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes

Output 2. Irrigation system and agricultural land management enhanced. The project will strengthen management and O&M of target irrigation systems, including practical drought and climate risk management, to ensure the sustainability of the investment benefits. In conjunction with output 1, under the participatory planning process, the project will (i) reorganize and strengthen the institutional capacity of WUAs and WUA subgroups for more effective organization; and (ii) build the capacity of the SAWR representatives, WUA and WUA subgroup representatives, and farmers on effective and resilient irrigation system management, water use, and agronomy. The project will develop and implement joint SAWR–WUA irrigation system management plans, including water delivery scheduling and O&M financing and planning. WUA on-farm water management and agricultural management plans with gender elements will be developed, including irrigation scheduling, cropping patterns, and cultural methods, and will be supported with capacity building for farmers and community members (including women), such as comparative field trials and farmer field days.

Output 3. National disaster risk management capacity improved.

The project will support capacity building and upgrade equipment for national DRM in the water resources sector. Heavy machinery and specialist equipment for preventive and rehabilitation works, such as excavators, bulldozers, and cranes, will be purchased and installed in the Northern and Southern Emergency Response Centers of the MOES. This will be accompanied by enhancement of the Centers’ asset management and capacity building on DRM, including project planning, to undertake preventive and rehabilitation works more efficiently in the water resources sector. Hydrological posts for Kyrgyzhydromet will be installed in about 20 sites in the project’s target areas and an information system for enhanced data collection, processing, and flood warning will be pilot tested for improved efficiency and accuracy.

3. SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY FOR REPORTING PERIOD

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ON PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

On January 8, 2020, 8 PIU specialists’ contracts were signed in accordance with the results of selection process held in the previous quarter. Contracts were signed with the following specialists: 1) Disbursement Specialist, PIU-03-ICS-2019 - J. Sultanova 2) Monitoring and Evaluation, Specialist PIU-05-ICS-2019- Kenenbaev N. 3) Procurement Specialist, PIU-07-ICS-2019- U. Zhaparov

3 4) Agricultural Specialist, PIU-10-ICS-2019- Masalbekov R. 5) Irrigation specialist (chief engineer), PIU-08-ICS-2019-Joldoshaliev I.A. 6) Translator/interpreter of PIU, PIU-12/1-ICS-2019 PIU - J. Kozhobergenova 7) Safeguard Specialist, PIU-04-ICS-2019 - K. Zhunusbaev 8) Hydrometeorology Specialist, PIU-11-ICS-2019 - K. Dzhakipova The PIU established and staffed.

The Project implementation consultant (Joint venture Temelsu International Engineering Services Inc., Turkey and Mott MacDonald Ltd., Great Britain) was selected, the contract was made on December 10, 2019. The PIC has been mobilized and performed their assignment since January, 2020. Starting meeting of the PIC was held on January 12 with the participation of representatives of "Mott MacDonald" and "Temelsu": Hussein Yavuz, Nurullah Sezen, Shaban Chimen, Rustam Madumarov.

The PIC submitted its initial report on February 21 (Russian version), while the PIU prepared comments and suggestions for the initial report. The PIC resubmitted final version on March 16 in English. The agreed Work Program is presented in Appendix 7 (in A3 format). On March 16, the PIC submitted a report on the selection of subprojects. After discussing and receiving comments from the PIU, the final version was submitted for ADB approval on March 24th.

On March 17, PIC held a presentation on component 2. Olaf Verheyen, agricultural and marketing specialist made a presentation on “Integrated, Participatory, Gender-Based Phased Subproject Implementation.” Participants familiarized themselves with the planning process and management of irrigation systems, taking into account the gender management method, including water supply planning and financing, and O&M planning.

PIC reports. The Project implementation consultant (PIC) regularly submits monthly progress reports: for January at 1st of February, for February at 10th of March, for March on 3d of April. The first quarterly report was submitted on April 7.

Due to coronavirus (COVID-19), local and international staff of PIC were going to remote online work from March 23, 2020.

4 1.2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION BY COMPONENTS

1.2.1 OUTPUTS 1 AND 2: IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZED AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND AGRICULTURAL LAND MANAGEMENT IMPROVED

During the first quarter period of 2020 project implementation activity under outputs 1 and 2 was carried out according to the next directions:

- Review, study of the Project Administration Memorandum and make proposals. - Data collection, - Design sub-consultant selection, - Surveys of subprojects 2,3,4, - Preparation of preliminary reports for subprojects 2,3,4 and getting approval, - Feasibility study development for subprojects 2,3,4, - Working design development for subproject Pravaya Vetka. - Development of TOR for community mobilization work.

The PIU jointly with PIC reviewed, discussed and accepted draft contract and ToR for design sub-consultant. Shopping method was carried out among design companies taking into account the criteria worked out by the PIC based on PAM recommendations. Four companies Hydroconsult Ltd, Nur SJB Ltd, Geoconsult Ltd and Al-Chin Ltd were reviewed. As a result of the evaluation of submitted information from bidders the highest score was received by Geoconsult Ltd. The PIC made a contract with Geoconsult Ltd on February 14, 2020 for performance of sub-consulting services to develop feasibility study and design of subprojects.

On February 7, 2020 the one-day ADB review mission met with PIU and PIC to discuss project targets, to review project launch stage and other project related issues. The following subproject selection process was agreed during this meeting. 1. Subproject selection report. In the report previously selected subprojects are described, planned works are stated and expected compliance to selection criteria is indicated. 2. Feasibility study. After getting approval at the initial stage, feasibility studies shall be started for preliminarily selected subprojects. At this stage the data will be collected to conduct more detailed economic and ecological analysis confirming compliance of subproject. 3.Working design. After approval of feasibility studies, working design for selected subprojects shall be developed, including detailed drawings, bills of quantities, technical specifications, reports on design works.

Also, during ADB review mission the issues related to the Project Administration Memorandum and the co-financing of construction works of channels 3d and 4th orders were discussed with Mr. Natan Rive and Ms. Ainagul Amanova. On the issue of community mobilization, a decision was made to hire a company (subconsultant). On other issues, it was decided to consider them and make a decision during the first ADB mission in April 2020.

5 The PIU under supervision of SAWR selected three possible subprojects which comply with eligible criteria. These three subprojects represent all project-related oblasts, namely: 1) Saparbaev 1 and 2 (Nookat rayon, Osh oblast); 2) Kojo-Kaiyr (Kadamzhai rayon, Batken oblast) and 3) Osmon (Chui rayon, Chui oblast).

From 24 till 28 February as well as from 9 till 12 March of 2020 the PIU together with PIC and design sub-consultant had site visits to Pravay Vetka in Jalal-Abad oblast, Kojo-Kaiyr in Batken oblast and Saparbaev1, 2 in Osh oblast. During their visits the schemes were inspected and studied, necessary data were collected. During the trip’s meetings were held with representatives of oblast and rayon subdivisions of SAWR, WUA.

On 13th of March, 2020 representatives of Executive Agency, PIU, PIC, international consultant Olaf Verheijen, design sub-consultant had a site visit to Osmon in Chui oblast. During the trip the scheme was inspected and studied, necessary data were collected. Also were conducted meetings with leadership of Chui rayon, rayon subdivision of SAWR, WUA. Following the trip outcomes, the subproject selection reports were prepared (canal Saparbaev 1 and 2 in Nookat rayon of Osh oblast; canal Kojo-Kaiyr in Kadamjai rayon of Batken oblast; canal Osmon in Chui rayon of Chui oblast) and submitted for approval to ADB.

In accordance with project implementation schedule in first quarter a tentative survey was carried out for subprojects Saparbaev 1 and 2 in Nookat of Osh oblast, Kojo-Kaiyr in Kadamjai rayon of Batken oblast, Osmon in Chui rayon of Chui oblast. The report on selection of subprojects was prepared and sent to ADB based on the preliminary survey outcomes. On completion of these works the PIU, PIC and international consultants came to conclusion that subprojects (canals) Saparbaev 1 and 2, Kojo-Kaiyr, Osmon at this stage complied with eligible criteria for further investments. Currently feasibility study works are ongoing.

The design sub-consultant is developing design for construction and modernization works for subproject Pravaya Vetka in Nooken rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast. Inspection works, topographic survey has been completed, detailed design has been initiated.

The PIC prepared draft terms of reference for recruiting a community mobilization sub- consultant. This document was considered by PIU and approved as a whole. The procedure on sub-consultant selection has started.

The PIC prepared and submitted to PIU for review the materials on awareness campaign. However, taking into account situation with coronavirus in , these activities will be held after completion of quarantine and curfew. Subproject selection description, design company selection and field survey outcomes are in Appendix 2. Detailed description of works on selected subprojects for implementation of output 2 is in Appendix 3.

6 1.2.1.1 EXPECTED ACTIVITIES:

1. Development of a feasibility study for subprojects 2,3,4.

2. Continuation of work on the development of a working design for the Pravaya Vetka subproject.

3. Preparation of an initial environmental assessment (IEE).

4. Updating of an Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP).

5. Preparation of a site-specific Environmental management plan (SEMP).

6. Preparation of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP).

7. Completion of development and approval of Terms of Reference for community mobilization work.

8. Hiring a company (subconsultant) to carry out community mobilization.

9. Conducting an awareness campaign.

1.2.2 COMPONENT: 3. NATIONAL DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENTCAPACITY IMPROVED

1.2.2.1 PROCUREMENT OF HEAVY MACHINERY FOR THE MINISTRY OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

Regulation on Technical Coordination Council (TCC) was elaborated and approved by order no. 189 of MoES of the KR as of February 28, 2020 for high-quality and efficient implementation of output 3 under the Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project. By the same order were established technical coordination councils of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Kyrgyz Republic for procurement of heavy machinery and construction of gauging stations and procurement of equipment for gauging stations. In accordance with the Regulation on TCC MoES of the KR will provide performance of activities and regulation of work of subdivisions and staff of MoES of the KR on appropriate direction of project, preparation and approval of technical specifications, terms of references, evaluation of technical proposals from providers of goods and services. Market research (price monitoring) for supply of heavy machinery was done, on basis of which the average price for each type of machinery was identified. Heavy machinery price monitoring was conducted among official dealers (distributors) in the Kyrgyz Republic such companies as Komatsu, Doosan, Hyundai, Howo, Shantui, XCMG, etc. The technical coordination council of MoES of KR for procurement of engineer machinery specified the demands in heavy machinery according to the average price monitoring. Besides that the main criterion under specification of the demand was efficiency of machinery’s use for

7 preventive and emergency-recovery operations, in connection with this some types of machinery were excluded. The specified demand for heavy machinery makes 80 units. The price is the basic reason of decreased number of machineries. The initial need in machinery was drafted in 2017 during project preparation, approximate prices for machinery were considerably lower, than the results of held monitoring. The specified demand for machinery is approved by the Minister of Emergency Situations of the KR. (Appendix 5). Additionally, meetings of TCC of MoES of KR for procurement of heavy machinery were held, where technical specifications for machinery and bid documents were considered and approved. The bid documents were submitted to ADB for approval. Due to coronavirus situation there are such risks as conducting later tendering process, than it is planned as well as participation of fewer bidders. In order to identify approximate amount of financial funds required for customs clearance of machinery, the work was carried out with Customs service under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. Due to the calculations made US$ 1 700 thousand is required for taxes and customs duties. Herein the main problematic issue on procurement of heavy machinery is allocation of co- financing of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic for customs duties.

1.2.2.2 CONSTRUCTION OF GAUGING STATIONS AND PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT FOR GAUGING STATIONS

In January the PIU had meetings with PIC hydromet consultant, specialists of MoES of KR and Kyrgyzhydromet under MoES of KR, where issues of implementation of subcomponent “Construction of gauging stations and their equipping” were discussed, in particular creation of early mudflow warning system. Also were arranged secure and emergency response hydrologic units of Kyrgyzhydromet under MoES, testing laboratory and 3 acting gauging stations in Chui oblast. In January 2020 together with specialists from Agency for hydrometeorology under MoES of KR (further Kyrgyzhydromet) the preliminary list of gauging stations for rehabilitation was revised and it was decided to make inventory of all observation stations of Batken, Jalal-Abad, Osh oblasts and Chui river basin. In January the inventory survey of gauging stations on Chui basin was carried out by PIU and TCC on Hydromet, as a result 8 gauging stations were selected with associated works within the project. During period from 9 till 18 March, 2020 the inventory survey of about 45 existing and closed gauging and meteorological stations of Batken, Jalal-Abad and Osh oblasts was conducted to select gauging stations to be rehabilitated and renovated. During inventory survey meetings were tentatively held with heads and responsible persons of aiyl okmotu on land acquisition for gauging stations. Currently land acquisition activities have been started by PIU and Kyrgyzhydromet for construction of gauging stations. The outcomes of inventory survey and list of selected gauging stations for rehabilitation and renovation are in Appendix 6. 8 1.2.2.3 EXPECTED ACTIVITIES:

1. Bid announcement for heavy machinery, 2. Evaluation of technical proposals of bidders, 3. Cooperation with Agency for hydrometeorology under MoES of the KR on land acquisition for construction of gauging stations, 4. Development of terms of references for design institutes on development of design estimate documentation for construction of gauging stations.

4. INFORMATION ON PROCUREMENT

4.1 Contract awards and disbursement plan by years is in Appendix 4. 4.2 Current bids: Output 1: no procurement Output 2: no procurement Output 3:  IFB № MOES-G-ICB-1 – supply of heavy machinery for MoES of the KR. The bid documents for supply of heavy machinery for MoES of the KR were finalized, amended based on proposals of MoES of KR and agreed by them. The bid documents were submitted to ADB for approval on March 12, 2020.

Project management: а) Consulting services:  Selection of individual consultants was not held. б) Goods:  SOF-1-RFQ-2020-Accounting software for PIU. Procurement method - shopping. Invitation for submission of bid proposals as of 20 January of 2020 was sent to three providers, the deadline for bid submission was 30 January, 2020. By the deadline 3 proposals were submitted. The contract was awarded to Practika Ltd for the amount of KGS 665 000,0 and signed on 11 February of 2020.  The terms of reference for provision of services on development of web-site and firm style was developed, RFQ was submitted for approval to ADB on 19 March of 2020. в) Works:  No. Sh/W3/2019- Civil works for PIU office renovation. Procurement method is shopping. Invitation to submit proposals was sent to three contractors on November 27, 2019, the deadline for submission was December 11, 2019. Three proposals had been submitted by the submission deadline. The Contract was awarded to Era Leader Stroi Ltd. for the amount of KGS 676 000 and was signed

9 on 30 January of 2020. The renovation works on main rooms have been completed, additional works for toilets are under agreement.

4.3 Problems and unsettled issues. The issue on customs duties under procurement of heavy machinery is not settled.

4.4 Plan for next quarter.  To obtain approval of ADB for bidding documents on procurement of heavy machinery. To publish bid announcement on procurement of heavy machinery in electronic public procurement portal and in mass media. To hold a bid.  To obtain approval of ADB for request for quotations (RFQ) on procurement of services for web-site development.

5. PLANNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM ACHIEVEMENTS, PROJECT ACTIVITY DELIVERABLES AND INDICATORS

The project design and monitoring indicators are given in Appendix 1. Discussions are being held on change of these indicators for others which executive agencies use in monitoring. The project implementation consultant (PIC) in quarterly report suggests «to discuss a range of revisions to facilitate measurement of indicators of interim and final outcomes». These discussions will be undertaken in next quarter. Also, PIC consultants suggest to present project outcomes to use programs of geographic information systems (GIS) from open access such as QGIS. GIS programs and satellite data can be used for comparison of vegetation indexes and water stress of agricultural crops under output 2 and in early flood warning systems, inventory survey and management of assets of Southern and Northern emergency response centers under output 3.

6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES (RESETTLEMENT)

For reporting period safeguards activities covered mainly review of project conceptual materials and documents, training of PIU experts in environmental and social issues, as well as preparation of ecological and social documents to be used in the project. The PIU safeguards specialist proceeded to his duties on January 8, 2020. During the period from 16 till 31 January 2020 Mr. Saban Cimen, the environmental and social coordinator (ESC) of the PIC, visited Bishkek with the team of PIC experts. In course of this working mission the next activities were carried out: 1.3 Activity schedule

An activity schedule grouped by outputs in accordance with PAM and PIC ToR requirements was prepared jointly by PIC ESC and PIC local social expert (LSE), afterwards discussed item by item together with PIU safeguards specialist.

10 1.4 Review of project documents

Multiple project documents were reviewed during the inception period. The PIC prepared and submitted a review note for Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) of subproject Pravaya Vetka.

1.5 Training

Training on ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement was given by the PIC ESC for the PIU. Besides, the PIU safeguards specialist and hydromet specialist took part in two-day working seminar arranged by ADB to introduce to legal aspects of SPS ADB and experience exchange in grievance redress mechanism application practice.

1.6 Grievance redress mechanism (GRM)

The GRM proposed for Pravaya Vetka in IEE was reviewed and updated to clarify the responsibility of the Local Focal Point (LFP) and emphasize the role of contractors. The grievance redress mechanism was proposed in EMP, which has the same scheme that has LARP for subproject Pravaya Vetka. The procedure flowchat was also updated accordingly.

1.7 Selection of subprojects (screening)

1.7.1 Environmental screening

For candidate subprojects to be selected for further investment, they shall comply with requirements of category B or C in accordance with ADB SPS. The PIC together with PIU developed environmental screening check-list to help define the category for each candidate subproject. The check-list was developed based on ADB’s Environmental Assessment and Review Framework but adapted for local conditions. The subprojects relating to category А (able to cause considerable unfavorable ecologic consequences, which are imminent, diverse or unprecedented in environmental impact) were excluded at initial stage from the list of candidate subprojects. Further, this adapted check-list was applied to assess subprojects from the short list preliminarily compiled at the inception stage. The assessment was carried out by engineers of RDWR of Nookat rayon in Osh oblast, Kadamjai rayon in Batken oblast and Chui rayon in Chui oblast. As selected subprojects do not have substantial potential impact on environment, they are not located in ecologically protected rayons, the supposed works will be mainly small-scale and will consist of modernization of existing schemes and will be identic to pilot subproject Pravaya Vetka, that confirms minimal environmental impact, all of them according to the tentative assessment belong to category В. Note: description of selected subprojects under output 1 is in appendix 2.

11 1.7.2 Selection of subprojects (screening) based on potential impact of resettlement and land acquisition (LAR

According to the selection criterion, «… Next subprojects should not have right for participation and be included into project structure: … and v) require land acquisition for construction of new canals… and vi) subprojects of category А for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement in accordance with requirements of Safeguard Policy Statement of ADB». The construction works on suggested subprojects which are connected with rehabilitation of water facilities, to a greater extent will be carried out within existing infrastructure of canals. Nevertheless, all the selected subprojects will be inspected by PIU for impacts of land acquisition and resettlement, and when needed land acquisition and resettlement plan (LARP)will be prepared in compliance with Safeguard Policy Statement of ADB (2009).

1.8 Gender and social issues

The PIC developed and submitted to PIU « Integrated, Participatory and Gender Responsive Step-by-Step Approach for Subproject Implementation » with indication of key milestones, expected deliverables, responsible parties and estimated terms of performance. However, in connection with quarantine regime due to coronavirus, the time schedule will be revised and corrected.

1.9 Safeguards requirements for construction bid documents

The PIC prepared a list of regulations on environmental and social protection, which must be included into Technical Specifications and other construction bid documents. These items comply with requirements of IEE and EMP of Pravaya Vetka.

1.10 Subproject site visit

The first joint site visits of PIU and PIC to subprojects of southern region took place on 24 - 28 February of 2020. The goal of this field trip was introduction with subprojects: 1. Pravaya Vetka, Bazar-Korgon rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast,

2. Saparbaev 1 and 2, Nookat rayon, Osh oblast,

3. Kozho-Kaiyr, Kadamjai rayon, Batken oblast.

The visit to the scheme Pravaya Vetka started from headworks with subsequent driving round along the canal extension. At the headworks meeting was arranged with the head and chief engineer of Jalal-Abad BDWR. The assignment was given to start DED development for the subproject, as it was selected at the inception stage

12 The trip to the scheme Kojo-Kaiyr started from the headworks as well. Afterwards, the team of specialists of PIU and PIC accompanied by workers of Kadamjai RDWR visited the scheme Kojo-Kaiyr. The assignment was given to commence feasibility study (FS) for this subproject. The joint team PIU and PIC together with workers of Nookat RDWR started their visit to the scheme Saparbaev from the headworks with further driving round along the canal extension to survey canals Saparbaev 1 and Saparbaev 2. Based on outcomes of inspection the assignment was given to start FS for this subproject. As far as the goal of this trip was not detailed study of resettlement issues, initial environmental examination (IEE), as well as social and gender issues, so relevant meetings with extensive involvement of communities and other stakeholders were not arranged. These issues will be studied in process of development of FS and DED.

13 7. PROJECT FINANCIAL STATUS

Project financing is given in the table below

Table of financial status as of 31/03/2020 (from project implementation commencement) in US$

Cod Category Allocation of funds Contract awarding Disbursed Not disbursed e loan grant loan grant loan grant loan grant

3101 Consulting services for project 0 4 062 478 0 2 994 050 0 299 405 0 3 763 073 implementation: inspection, survey, questioning and design; seminars; community mobilization 3201 SAWR under the GKR 0 4 986 934 0 0 0 4 986 934 - Civil works (on-farm canals with distribution network) and demonstration activities 3202 SAWR under the GKR 0 3 128 516 0 0 0 3 128 516 - Civil works (off-farm canals with distribution network); equipment and machinery; O&M; services 3203 MoES –Civil works; equipment and 0 3 179 269 0 0 0 3 179 269 machinery; O&M; services

3901 PIU operational expenses. Vehicles and 0 1 442 803 0 0 197 268 0 1 245 535 audit services. Land acquisition and resettlement.

14 Cod Category Allocation of funds Contract awarding Disbursed Not disbursed e loan grant loan grant loan grant loan grant

301 SAWR under the GKR 10 390 973 0 0 0 10 390 973 0 - Civil works (off-farm canals with distribution network); equipment and machinery; O&M; services 302 MoES –Civil works; equipment and 10 559 541 0 0 0 10 559 541 0 machinery; O&M; services

6901 Interest during project implementation 849 486 0 0 0 849 486 0

Total 21 800 000 16 800 000 0 2 994 050 0 496 673 21 800 000 16 303 327

15 8. LAST ADB MISSION’S ACTION PLAN

The last review ADB mission took place on 7 February of 2020. Implementation of agreed actions are described below.

Next step Fixed period Liability Implementation status To share with PIU proposed outline of quarterly report 21 February ADB Completed 2020 To confirm to PIU on necessity 21 February ADB Completed of audit for 2019 2020 Share with PIU the economic 21 February ADB Completed model Excel file 2020 End of Completed Inception report PIC February 2020 To submit to ADB updated Completed heavy machinery bidding End of documents, and if necessary, PIU February 2020 request to update procurement plan PIU Due to weather conditions the survey To submit to ADB updates list Mid - March was held from 9 till of hydropost sites including 2020 19 March, updated expected works and equipment list is expected in April. To submit to ADB draft PIU End of March proposed ToR for community It is being performed. 2020 mobilization subcontractor To submit to PIU amended Amendments in the version of the PAM for review Early April PAM are in process ADB 2020 of discussion and preparation Inception mission Due to situation with Mid to late ADB coronavirus the date April 2020 might be changed. To prepare plan of demonstrational activities Q3 2020? PIU and PIC The term hasn’t come yet.

16 9. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION RELATED ISSUES

The main problems of the project in 1st quarter of 2020: 1. Co-financing of the GKR; 2. Co-financing to cover customs duties for procurement of heavy machinery; 3. The situation with coronavirus pandemic in the country since the 3rd decade of March has created difficulties in planning and carrying out field surveys, implementation of planned activities and in work of international and local consultants.

17 1. APPENDIX. PROJECT DESIGN AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK

The impact of the Project is to reduce losses in the agriculture and water resources sectors due to extreme weather conditions (National communication of the Kyrgyz Republic in FCCC UN and Development Program of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2018-2022 years). a

Results chain Performance indicators with targets and Data sources and Risks baselines reporting mechanisms Outcome By 2026: Climate change and a. Average gross profit (margin) of a-b. Annual WUA Unfavorable market disaster resilience of agricultural production reports conditions diminish infrastructure and water increased to 2 350$ per ha across target returns to agricultural security improved areas of about 20 000 ha production (2017 baseline: 1 900$ per ha). b

b. Average productivity of water withdrawn increased to 0,85 kg/m3 for wheat and 0,95 kg/m3 for corn across target areas of about 20 000 ha ( 2017 baseline: 0,6 kg/m3 for wheat and 0,6 kg/m3 for corn). b c. Annual number of households and area a. MoES annual of agricultural land protected and reports rehabilitated from disaster impacts by the Northern and Southern ERC works increased to 50 000 households and 24 000 ha of agricultural lands (2015-2017 annual average baseline: 306 projects, 20700 households and 10 700 ha)

Outputs By 2025:

1. Irrigation infrastructure 1a. Around 60 cross-regulating structures 1a-c. Annual PIU Extreme climatic and protected and modernized with associated off-takes and flow- project reports geophysical adversely measuring devices constructed in the main affect construction. (primary and secondary off-farm) canals (2018 baseline: not applicable).

18 Results chain Performance indicators with targets and Data sources and Risks baselines reporting mechanisms 1b. Unlined lower level canals (on-farm and off-farm) increased to 650 km (2018 baseline: 500 km) and lined lower level canals (on-farm and off-farm) increased to 150 km (2018 baseline:100 km).

1c. About 30 climate -proofed mudflow crossing structures constructed or modernized with increased protection structure (2018 baseline: not applicable).

2. Irrigation system and By 2025: agricultural land 2a. For each of approximately 4 irrigation 2a. Annual PIU project management improved subprojects a joint irrigation system reports sustainable O&M plan developed and endorsed by the respective Subproject Coordination Committee (2018 baseline: 0). 2b. For each of approximately 4 irrigation subprojects, WUA agriculture and OFWM plans with gender elements developed and endorsed by the respective WUA councils (2018 baseline: 0).

2c. About 6 000 farmers and community members (of whom 30% women) improved their knowledge of climate change and disaster- resilient OFWM and agriculture practices (2017 baseline: 0).

3. National disaster risk By 2025: management capacity 3a. Number of well-functioning heavy 3a-с. Annual PIU machinery and special equipment for project reports disaster prevention and rehabilitation works installed in the Northern and Southern ERCs increased to about 150 (2018 baseline: 89).

3b. Number of well-functioning hydrological monitoring stations connected to the monitoring network increased to about 96 (2018 baseline: 76). 3с. Disaster risk management plans for each Southern and Northern ERC, including asset management and project planning with gender elements (2018 baseline: 0).

19 2. APPENDIX. SUBPROJECT SELECTION DESCRIPTION, SELECTION OF DESIGN COMPANY AND FIELD SURVEYS OUTCOMES

2.1. SUBPROJECT SELECTION DESCRIPTION

From beginning of its activity, the PIU held analysis of proposed by the Executive Agency subprojects for compliance with ADB criteria and considered opinions expressed by deputies of the Parliament of the Kyrgyz Republic about that all three southern oblasts of the country are vulnerable to disasters. As result of held analysis, subject to opinions received from oblast and rayon state administrations, oblast and rayon subdivisions of SAWR, deputies of the Parliament presenting various regions of oblasts, the Executive Agency recommended to study about 15 schemes (subprojects) located in Jalal-Abad, Osh, Batken and Chui oblasts.

Related to vulnerability it is possible to consider and include almost all proposed in the long list canals to be modernized and rehabilitated due to sufficient factors of disaster risk and they were most exposed to repair-reconstructive works during last years because of floods, and the efficiency of off- farm canals because of destructive factors from consequences of mudflows, landslide processes, erosions and different destructions have been reduced from 80% till 35-40%.

From beginning of its activity, the PIU held analysis of the proposed by Executive Agency subprojects for compliance with ADB criteria. At stage of project preparation, the ADB consultants considered proposed subprojects and as a result the feasibility study was prepared, and one subproject was selected which is located in Jalal-Abad oblast -canal Pravaya Vetka in Nooken rayon. The PIU, PIC considering the opinion of the Executive agency, based on the criteria identified in the PAM, preliminarily selected three more subprojects: 1. Canal Saparbaev 1 and 2 in Nookat rayon, Osh oblast; 2. Canal Kojo-Kaiyr in Kadamjai rayon, Batken oblast; 3. Canal Osmon in Chui rayon, Chui oblast.

Having studied in detail the proposed subprojects for compliance with the selection criteria specified by ADB, the following is noted: in all considered subprojects to be included in the project, water supply systems operate without pump stations and land acquisition is not planned. Concerning environmental and social safeguards these sites tentatively correspond to B category. According to the Aide Memoire of ADB as of 7 February, 2020 at this stage the data and feasibility study on three additional subprojects are required to submit request to proceed to the detailed design for Pravaya Vetka and three additional subprojects. In compliance with this Aide Memoire the economic analysis maybe be approximate based on expert judgment of available information.

The proposed subprojects for approval are located in similar natural, relief, climatic, soil, agricultural conditions as subproject Pravaya Vetka. The yield and price indicators of agricultural crops are also similar. Taking this into account we can make preliminary conclusion that economic internal norm of profit will be almost same as in subproject Pravaya Vetka (more than 9%).

20 2.2. SELECTION OF SAPARBAEV CANAL, IN OSH OBLAST FOUR OFF-FARM CANALS WERE PROPOSED IN THE SHORT LIST FROM THE EXECUTIVE AGENCY.

The canal Saparbaev was selected from this list due to the following criteria:

1. Canal Saparbaev complies with all selection criteria required by ADB. 2. Canal Saparbaev from the proposed by SAWR schemes (sites) is the most vulnerable to climate change and disasters, as the canal passes along the mountain slope and has on its route numerous mudflow check structures and mudflow storage reservoirs being in unsatisfactory condition.

2.3. SELECTION OF KOJO-KAIYR CANAL, TWO OFF-FARM CANALS WERE PROPOSED IN THE SHORT LIST FROM SAWR FOR BATKEN OBLAST.

The Kojo-Kaiyr canal was selected from list due to the following criteria:

1. Taking into consideration the fact that at the inception stage specialists of the consulting company hired by ADB for project rejected canal Kulunda, so in Batken oblast only Kojo- Kaiyr canal remained in the list proposed by SAWR (DWR). The Kojo-Kaiyr canal complies with all selection criteria indicated in the PAM. 2. The Kojo-Kaiyr canal is vulnerable to climate change and disasters, because the canal passes along the mountain slope and has on its route numerous mudflow check structures and exposed to filtration.

2.4. SELECTION OF ОSMON CANAL, IN CHUI OBLAST FIVE OFF-FARMSMON CANAL,INCHUIOBLASTFIVEOFF-FARM CANALS WERE PROPOSED IN THE SHORT LIST BY SAWR.

From this list canal Osmon was selected due to following criteria:

1. Оsmon canal complies with all selection criteria required by ADB. The Оsmon canal is the most vulnerable to climate change and disasters as the canal meets two river sections and doesn’t have mudflow crossing structures, in connection with that canal doesn’t have possibility to provide water users in full volume with irrigation water in vegetation period.

2.5. INFORMATION ON OFF-FARM CANAL SAPARBAEV (NOOKAT RAYON IN OSH OBLAST).

The Saparbayev canal is divided into two parts, the first part from PК0 00 to PK 84 52 is Saparbayev-1 and across the Abshyr-Sai river the canal is called Saparbayev-2. The Saparbayev-1 canal was commissioned in 1972 and starts from the main canal Naiman. The extension of the canal is 8.45 km; the type of lining is monolithic concrete with trapezoidal cross section. Its design capacity is 8.0 m3/s, and its actual capacity is 6.4 m3/s due to sedimentary areas of the canal. The Saparbayev-1 canal provides with irrigation water the WUA Abshyr-Tany with a service area of 2,333 hectares on the territory of Kok-Jar aiyl okmotu. The Saparbayev-2 canal was commissioned in 1982 and is fueled by the Saparbayev-1 canal and the Abshyr-Sai river through the Teshik-Tash headsworks. The extension of the canal is 20.44 km. Type 21 of lining: 1.6 km of the canal is from Г-shaped blocks with rectangular cross section, 13.0 km part of the canal is from monolithic concrete with trapezoidal cross section, and its tray part has 5.84 km extension. The canal design capacity is 5.0 m3/s and its actual capacity is 3.2 m3/s. The Saparbayev- 2 canal provides with irrigation water two WUAs: Moltur-Suu with a service area of 1200 hectares and Toolos- Nookat with a service area of 2,075 hectares on the territory of two local self- governments (LSGs) On- Eki -Bel and Toolos. Due to the fact that canal design capacity has decreased to 5 - 3,2 m3/sec the water users of the above-mentioned local self-governments, who are in the most end part, have very big problems with irrigation water delivery at the height of crop season. There are disputes and differences between water users of two LSGs (aiyl okmotu) due to lack of irrigation water. During the growing period, water practically does not reach the irrigated areas of the above-mentioned local self-governments. The Saparbaiev canal is located on the territory of Nookat rayon in Osh oblast and belongs to the basin of the Syr-Darya river. The distance from Osh is 60 km. This canal provides an area of 5 608 hectares with irrigation water and does not belong to cross-country transboundary irrigation systems. The canal efficiency is 0.65. On the canal there are 10 mudflow storage reservoirs and 14 mudflow check structures, more than 7.2 km of sides of the canal on the left downstream are destroyed that leads to an increase in water loss. From April to June due to rains and hails, the canal is filled with sludge and stones, so mechanized cleaning is carried out on the canal every year. Major renovation works were not carried out on the Saparbaiev canal during many years’ service of the canal between 1994 -2018. Minor recovery works are done with the assistance of non-governmental organizations, and these activities are not effective enough. The population is growing, need for irrigation water is increasing, so major repair and rehabilitation works of this facility are urgent to be conducted for efficient use of irrigation water. Due to its vulnerability to natural disasters, Saparbaiev canal was included in the list of subprojects.

2.6. INFORMATION ON OFF-FARM CANAL KOJO-KAIYR (KADAMJAI RAYON IN BATKEN OBLAST).

The main canal Kojo-Kaiyr is located on the territory of Kadamzhai rayon in Batken oblast and belongs to the basin of the Syr-Darya river. The distance from Osh to the site is 130 km. The canal was commissioned in 1965, it takes in water from the Isfairam -Sai river and does not belong to cross-country transboundary irrigation systems. The canal has a trapezoidal cross-section, with 31.0 km extension. The design capacity of the canal is 9.0 m3/s, today its actual capacity is 7.5 m3/s, the efficiency of the canal is 0.65. There are 72 different hydraulic structures on the canal. The allotted irrigation area of the Kojo-Kaiyr main canal is 5669 hectares, it provides with irrigation water three WUAs Kara-Dobo with a service area of 2020 hectares, Isa-Mariam with a service area of 863 hectares and Kojo-Kaiyr with a service area of 2,983 hectares, which are located on the territory of three local self-governments (aiyl okmotu) Masaliev, Maidan and Markaz.

The status of the canal requires capital expenditures, due to the limited financial resources allocated from the state budget for operation and maintenance, renovation of the canal was not fully effective. It is necessary to rehabilitate 14 flume overpasses on the canal to continuously provide water users of three WUAs with irrigation water. Because of this when choosing a subproject in Batken oblast, the preference was given to Kojo-Kaiyr canal, since this canal meets the eligibility criteria for the irrigation systems specified in the PAM.

22 2.7. INFORMATION ON OFF-FARM CANAL OSMON-ARYK (CHUI RAYON IN CHUI OBLAST).

The canal was built in 1937. The extension of the off-farm irrigation canal is 22,6 km, 3.37 km of which are lined, 19.23 km are in an earthen bed. The bottom slop varies from 0.0021 to 0.0076 m. It passes below parallel to Vostochny Bolshoi Chuisky Kanal system. Osmon off-farm canal system provides water users: 1. Iskra LSG with a service area of 1202 ha; 2. Sailyk LSG with a service area of 1781 ha; 3. Chui LSG with a service area of 1458 ha; 4. Аk-Beshim LSG with a service area of 1421 ha. The total command area is 5862 ha. Under Osmon canal provides three water user associations: Karagul-Ata with a service area of 1700 ha, Filun with a service area of 556 ha and Ak-Beshim with a service area 1140 ha in three Chui, Iskra and Ak-Beshim LSGs. On the rest part of irrigated area, where is no WUA, the rayon unit of WUA’ support carries out work on establishment of WUA. Osmon off-farm canal performs water withdrawal from Obvodnoi Chuisky Kanal 2 (ОChК-2) with flow rate of 7 m3/s, as well as from Vostochny Bolshoi Chuisky Kanal system (VBChK) with flow rate of 4.5 m3/s (at PC 138 + 40 -1.5 m3/s, at PC 170 +40 - 2 m3/s, at PC 200 +00 - 1 m3/s). The total water diversion to Osmon off-farm canal is 11.5 m3/s. Osmon canal has 22 hydroposts, 11 discharge outlets, 5 road bridges, 2 pipes, 5 division gates, 2 inverted syphons, 2 spillways. Due to long-term operation, as well as annual discharge of sediments during the flood period from the Burana and Kyzyl-Suu rivers, Osmon canal needs to be modernized and rehabilitated. This scheme (facility) was proposed by the Executive Agency, the State Agency of Water Resources under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic, to be included in the implementation plan of Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project. However, during preparation of the first version of the inception report on subproject selection for Osmon canal the water diversion of 7 m3/s was wrongly taken rather than 11.5 m3/s. The control potential of this facility at 5862 hectares will make 1.96 l/s/ha rather than 1.19 l/s/ha, as indicated in the report prepared by the consultants. This indicator was specified in the report for this subproject as not meeting the regulatory criterion of 1.5 l/s/ha, which is not true. We think that this scheme meets the criteria specified in the Project Administration Manual and can be accepted for the development of Feasibility Study.

On all these three subprojects (schemes) sufficient information, linear schemes and maps, including space images have been collected. Annotation of WUAs (that are provided with irrigation water by these off-farm canals) with linear schemes, digital maps, information about agricultural crops and their crop yield, etc. have been collected as well.

2.8. DESIGN COMAPNY SELECTION

It was decided and agreed with ADB to recruit a sub-consultant to prepare design estimate documentation (DED) of the selected subprojects. For this purpose, shopping 23 was carried out among design companies taking into account the criteria developed by the consulting company Temelsu. Four companies Hydroconsult Ltd, Nur SJB Ltd, Geoconsult Ltd and Al-Chin Ltd participated in the competition. As a result of the evaluation of submitted information from bidders the highest score was received by Geoconsult Ltd.

2.9. FIELD SURVEY OUTCOMES

The PIU together with the Consultant (PIC) and Sub-Consultant Geoconsult Ltd arranged a review mission from February 24 to February 28, 2020 to the sites: Pravaya Vetka in Jalal-Abad oblast, Kojo-Kayir in Batken oblast and Saparbaiev in Osh oblast. The main objective of site visit of the PIU and Geoconsult Ltd was to be introduced with technical condition of subprojects, to establish contact between the Sub-Consultant Geoconsult Ltd and operating organizations of irrigation system and to coordinate the schedule of water supply stop with Kadamjai RDWR, Nookat RDWR and Nooken RDWR and to inform representatives of BDWR and RDWR on the commencement and time frame of detailed studies, including topographic surveys prior to the start of the new vegetation season. Composition of the site visit team: 1. Iskender Dzholdoshaliev, PIU chief engineer; 2. Rakhmanaly Masalbekov, PIU agriculture specialist; 3. Kalyibek Zhunusbaev, PIU safeguard specialist; 4. Rustam Madumarov, PIC deputy team leader; 5. Nazgul Sharshenova, PIC gender and social expert; 6. Larisa Utkina, PIC design engineer; 7. Kuvat Isakov, PIC supervision engineer; 8. Zhanybek Orozaly Uulu, PIC supervision consultant

1. Pravaya Vetka canal

Canal Pravaya Vetka is the main subproject that has already been selected during the preparation of the ADB project and on which the Canal Rehabilitation Feasibility Study has already been carried out. The survey was conducted by the head of Jalal-Abad BDWR Abduvaliev T. and the chief engineer of BDWR and Nooken RDWR. The canal Pravaya Vetka was built in 1954. Water is taken into the canal from Karaungursai river by the headworks of dam type. Under the canal Pravaya Vetka there are 14,157 hectares of irrigated land allotted, including 2,580 ha of Bazarkorgon rayon and 11,577 ha of Nooken rayon. The total canal extension is about 20 km. Flow rate in the canal head by passport is 18m3/s. The main water users in the Karaungursai river basin are WUAs, communities with home areas and rural administrations. The Karaungursai river itself is not a transboundary source as its water is not shared with neighboring states. However, this river is a tributary of the cross-border Syrdarya river.

24 The Karaungursai river water is shared between neighboring rayons, namely between Bazarkorgon and Nooken, according to the water use plans developed by RDWR and agreed with Jalalabad BDWR. This basin is experiencing extensive irrigation development with full water intake during the vegetation period. In the region water shortages often occur on all irrigated lands regardless of water supply sources. The proposed rehabilitation works on the canal Pravaya Vetka with structures are defined during the ADB Technical Support phase. Representatives of the Jalal-Abad BDWR and Nooken RDWR were involved during this period. As a result of these works a feasibility study has been drawn up, which includes priority rehabilitation activities, but to date the representatives of BDWR and RDWR have proposals to include some more structures on this canal and headworks.

Photo 1. Washing out of discharge canal, a section of headworks.

25 Photo 2. Washing out of the structure’s tail race, a section of headworks.

Photo 3. The log canal is blurred and close to structures on PК15 +25.

26 Photo 4. The lower part of the structure at the HPP branch is eroded

Photo 5. Problem with water intake at Vahum-Aral outlet

27 Photo 6. Inverted syphon on the border of Bazar-Korgon and Nooken RDWR

2. Kojo-Kaiyr canal

The canal Kojo-Kaiyr is located on the territory of Kadamzhai rayon in Batken oblast. The canal was commissioned in 1965, it takes in water from the Isfairam -Sai river to supply WUAs on the west bank. It does not belong to cross-country transboundary irrigation systems. The main parameters of Kojo-Kaiyr: 1. total canal extension - 31 km, 2. irrigated area - 5669 ha, 3. canal extension in concrete lining - 13 km, 4. design capacity - 9,0 m3/s, 5. actual capacity - 7,5 m3/s.

On the allotted area of Kojo-Kaiyr canal there are three WUAs: Kara-Dobo - 2020 ha, Isa-Mariam - 863 ha, Коjo-Kaiyr - 2983 ha. The head of the Kadamjai RDWR and the head of the Kojo-Kaiyr section participated in the survey. The main problem of the canal is poor condition of mudflow check structures, which prevents normal operation of the canal. There are 14 mudflow check structures on the canal, requiring rehabilitation works. Another problem is poor condition of the canal lining, which increases filtration loss and reduces the canal capacity.

28 Photo 7. Headworks at Kojo-Kayir canal

Photo 8. Directing dam

29 Photo 9. Kojo-Kaiyr canal

Photo 10. Kojo-Kaiyr canal

30 3. Saparbaev canal

The Saparbaev canal is located in Nookat rayon, Osh oblast, approximately 60 km to south-west of Osh city. The canal consists of two parts. The first part is Saparbaev-1, across the Abshyr-Sai river the canal is called Saparbayev-2. Both canals do not relate to transboundary systems The Saparbayev-1 canal was commissioned in 1972 and starts from the main canal Naiman, located to the east from the scheme. The canal provides with irrigation water the WUA "Abshyr-Tany" with a service area of 2,333 ha. The main parameters of Saparbaev-1 canal: 1. total canal extension - 8,45km, 2. service area - 2333ha, 3. canal extension in concrete lining - 8,45km, 4. design capacity - 8,0m3/s, 5. actual capacity - 6,4m3/s. From the left mountain side of the canal Saparbaev-1 there are thirteen mudflow storage reservoirs, nine of which control particularly dangerous mudslides during floods, but they are in poor condition. In addition, in 2008 as a result of mud flood the canal on the PК80 96 was destroyed, and since then irrigation water has been supplied through a temporary water pipeline in a limited amount. Major renovation works were not carried out on the Saparbaev canal in the period of 1994 -2018. Minor recovery works have been done with the assistance of non-governmental organizations, and these activities are not effective enough.

The Saparbayev-2 canal was commissioned in 1982, and it is fueled by the Saparbayev-1 canal and the Abshyr-Sai river through the Teshik-Tash headsworks. The main parameters of Saparbaev-2: 1. total canal extension - 20,44km, 2. service area - 3275ha, 3. canal extension in concreter lining (Г-blocks) - 1,6km, 4. canal extension in monolithic concrete lining with trapezoidal cross section - 13,0km, 5. canal extension in trays - 5,84k, 6. design capacity - 5,0m3/s, 7. actual capacity - 3,2m3/s. The canal Saparbayev-2 provides with irrigation water two WUAs: - Moltur-Suu - 1200 ha. - Тооlos-Nookat -2075 ha. At a length of about 10 km the lining of the left slope of the canal Saparbaev-2 is severely damaged, which increases filtration losses and reduces canal capacity. In addition, the canal capacity is greatly reduced between April and June due to severe silting of the canal behind the water intake from Abshir-Sai river due to small slope of the canal. There are seven mudflow check structures on Saparbaev-2 canal, six of which are often blocked throughout the year. Limited water supply to water users at the peak of vegetation season in the final part of Saparbaev-2 canal often causes disputes between two WUAs mentioned above. The survey of the canal was carried out with participation of the head of Nookat RDWR.

31 Photo 11. Head of RDWR informs on the canal

Photo 12. Current status of the canal

From 9 to 13 March there was arranged another joint visit of four subprojects by PIU and PIC with participation of: - Masalbekov R. – PIU agriculture specialist; - Olaf Verhejen – PIC agriculture specialist; - Kydyralieva N.- PIC specialist for social issues.

32 During the site visit they met with representatives of RDWR, RSU and WUAs, surveyed off-farm and on-farm canals and visited offices of the WUAs. Information on cultivated crops and yields was collected, as well as information on the gender and social situation in the WUAs. Photo 13. Office of WUA Shaidan-Kara-Unkur

Photo 14. Office of WUA Kenesh-Suu

33 Photo 15. Aqueduct on the secondary canal of Shaidan Vetka, Pravay Vetka

Photo 16. On-farm canal of WUA Кenesh-Suu

34 Photo 17. Office of WUA Abshyr-Tangy

Photo 18. Director of WUA Abshyr-Tangy on gender issues in WUA

35 Photo 19. Meeting with a member of Toolos Nookat WUA’s Council

Photo 20. Meeting with designers at Saparbaev canalа

Photo 21. Mud storage reservoir at Saparbaev canal

36 Photo 22. Meeting with RDWR and WUA representatives from Kadamjai rayon

37 Photo 23. Meeting with farmers from Kadamjai rayon

Photo 24. Inspection of the canal Kojo-Kaiyr

38 Photo 25. Canal Osmon

Photo 26. Upper zone of Burana river 39 Photo 27. Kyzyl-Suu river mates with Osmon canal

Photo 28. Meeting with representatives of WUA Karagul-Ata 40 41 3. APPENDIX. WORKS ON SELECTED SUBPROJECTS FOR PERFORMANCE OF OUTPUT 2

Much work has been done on the selected subprojects for component 2 to collect information on water users who receive irrigation water from tertiary and quaternary canals. Community mobilization and capacity-building for the WUAs shall be provided by the Project under canal works to achieve intermediate outputs 1 and 2.

 Under Pravaya Vetka there are 8 WUAs:

No Name of WUA Area, ha Rehabilitation year Notes .

1 Shaidan-Kara-Unkur 1048 2011 WB

2 Aikol-Suu 802 -

3 Murat-Murap 2660 2005 WB

4 Aral-Sai 1767 2007 WB

5 Nooken-К 2324 2011 WB

6 Taimonku 1317 2019 WB

7 Sakaldy-Suu 972 2015 WB

8 Kenesh-Suu 2159 2007 WB

Total: 13049

As it can be seen from the table the irrigated area makes up about 13 000 ha, according to PAM it is necessary to create seven CDTs on this area. All WUAs except WUA Aikol-Suu received funds from World Bank projects in different years for rehabilitation of their on-farm tertiary and quaternary canals. But due to limited funds from WB (US $320 per 1 ha.) not all WUAs’ canals have been rehabilitated, there are still many problems with on-farm canals. 200 subprojects are envisaged for rehabilitation of tertiary and quaternary canals, if they are conditionally divided into 4 subprojects (Pravaya Vetka, Saparbayev, Kojo-Kaiyr and Osmon-Aryk), then each subproject for rehabilitation of tertiary and quaternary canals will have about 50 small subprojects. It considerably increases small contracts management risks, for example, under Pravaya Vetka there will be 50 small subprojects for 8 WUAs, each WUA will have to manage 6 or 7 small subprojects. It should be noted that only WUA has a legal status to operate on-farm tertiary and quaternary canals and to make contracts as well. On this basis instead of 50 small subprojects under Pravaya Vetka it would be advisable to enlarge small sub-projects taking into account the needs of the WUAs and to make small 8 subprojects for rehabilitation of tertiary and quaternary canals.

 Under off-farm canals Saparbaev and Kojo-Kaiyr there are 3 WUAs in each:

No Rehabilitation Name of WUA Area, ha Note . year

Off-farm canal Saparbaev

1 Abshir-Тany 2233 2009 ВБ 42 No Rehabilitation Name of WUA Area, ha Note . year

2 Moltu-Suu 1200 -

3 Toolos-Nookat 3365 2004 ВБ

Total 6798

Off-farm canal Kojo-Kaiyr

1 Isa-Mariam 1414 2015 ВБ

2 Kara-Dobo 1808 2010 ВБ

3 Коjo-Kaiyr 2200 2007 ВБ

Total 5422

43 Cultivated crops and yields of all WUAs are similar, mainly growing crops are shown in tables below (by crop’s area and yields):

Crop patterns in Кara-Ungur-Sai, Nooken rayon for 2016 Crops are (in ha) Name of Aiyl No. Name of WUA winter permanent Household's Okmotu cotton grain maize onion potato vegetable oilseeds gourd field rice gardens wheat grasses gardens Total, ha Nooken rayon 1 Masy Murat-Murap 852.0 760.0 180.0 51 300 10 271 2424.0 2 Nooken Nooken-К 500.0 922.0 68.0 173.0 4.0 333.0 409 2409.0 3 Sakaldy Taimonku 170.0 640.0 187.0 16.0 5.0 159.0 140 1317.0 4 Shaidan Shaidan-Каrа-Ungurrаrа-Ungur-Ungur 330.0 50.0 161.0 25.0 15.0 300.0 9.0 158 1048.0 5 Shaidan Aikol-Suu 70.0 469.0 101.0 15.0 11.0 10.0 48.0 10.0 10.0 58 802.0 6 Aral Aral-Sai 605.0 750.0 359.0 107.0 50.0 144.0 42.0 21.0 160 2238.0 7 Sakaldy Sakaldy-Suu 140.0 420.0 130.0 39.0 16.0 116.0 21.0 90 972.0 Total for rayon: 2667 4011 1186 426 30 81 1400 52 71 1286 11210.0 Crop patterns in Кara-Ungur-Sai, Nooken rayon for 2017 Crops area (in ha) Name of Aiyl No. Name of WUA winter permanent Household's Okmotu cotton grain maize onion potato vegetable oilseeds gourd field rice gardens wheat grasses gardens Total, ha Nooken rayon 1 Masy Murat-Murap 485.0 950.0 425.0 50.0 233.0 10.0 271 2424.0 2 Nooken Nooken-К 370.0 1075.0 203.0 119.0 23.0 200.0 10.0 409 2409.0 3 Sakaldy Taimonku 108.0 812.0 150.0 60.0 47.0 140 1317.0 4 Shaidan Shaidan-Каrа-Ungurrаrа-Ungur-Ungur 205.0 123.0 215.0 23.0 15.0 300.0 9.0 158 1048.0 5 Shaidan Aikol-Suu 183.0 220.0 124.0 41.0 10.0 156.0 10.0 58 802.0 6 Aral Aral-Sai 605.0 750.0 359.0 107.0 50.0 144.0 42.0 21.0 160 2238.0 7 Sakaldy Sakaldy-Suu 140.0 420.0 130.0 39.0 16.0 116.0 21.0 90 972.0 Total for rayon: 2096 4350 1606 439 48 66 1196 42 81 1286 11210.0

Crop patterns in Кara-Ungur-Sai, Nooken rayon for 2018 Crops area (in ha) Name of Aiyl No. Name of WUA winter permanent Household's Okmotu cotton grain maize onion potato vegetable oilseeds gourd field rice gardens wheat grasses gardens Total, ha Nooken rayon 1 Masy Murat-Murap 709.0 956.0 180.0 40.0 8.0 250.0 10.0 271 2424.0 2 Nooken Nooken-К 355.0 1098.0 191.0 22.0 101.0 19.0 204.0 10.0 409 2409.0 3 Sakaldy Taimonku 130.0 680.0 175.0 14.0 178.0 140 1317.0 4 Shaidan Shaidan-Каrа-Ungurrаrа-Ungur-Ungur 200.0 257.0 200.0 8.0 15.0 201.0 9.0 158 1048.0 5 Shaidan Aikol-Suu 105.0 277.0 124.0 18.0 35.0 3.0 172.0 10.0 58 802.0 6 Aral Aral-Sai 224.0 952.0 332.0 27.0 185.0 15.0 296.0 45.0 21.0 160 2257.0 7 Sakaldy Sakaldy-Suu 136.0 557.0 99.0 9.0 60.0 21.0 90 972.0 Total for rayon: 1859 4777 1301 67 392 37 23 1361 45 81 1286 11229.0 Chief specialist of Nooken WUA RSU Bakirov Sh.

44 Crop yield in Kara-Ungur-Sai-Nookat rayon for 2016 Crop yields in c/ha Name of Aiyl No. Name of WUA winter maize for permanent Okmotu cotton grain maize onion potatoe tobacco vegetables oilseeds gourd field rice gardens wheat silage grasses Nooken rayon 1 Masy Murat-Murap 37.6 33.8 62.9 147.8 306.7 12.4 49.1 71.0 2 Nooken Nooken-К 37.2 32.8 61.0 0.0 286.3 8.5 336.0 58.7 75.1 3 Sakaldy Taimonku 37.5 36.5 61.5 154.0 291.3 304.5 62.2 68.8 4 Shaidan Shaidan-Каrа-Ungurrаrа-Ungur-Ungur 37.0 31.0 62.0 290.3 15.6 63.3 65.8 5 Shaidan Aikol-Suu 37.0 33.0 62.0 291.0 15.6 63.3 35.3 66.3 6 Aral Aral-Sai 37.5 36.2 63.1 149.0 308.6 316.8 68.0 37.5 70.9 7 Sakaldy Sakaldy-Suu 37.6 36.5 60.5 291.3 62.2 68.8 Total for rayon: 37 34 62 150 0 295 13 336 63 69

Crop yield in Kara-Ungur-Sai-Nookat rayon for 2017 Crop yields in c/ha Name of Aiyl No. Name of WUA winter maize for permanent Okmotu cotton grain maize onion potatoe tabacco vegetables oilseeds gourd field rice gardens wheat silage grasses Nooken rayon 1 Masy Murat-Murap 38.1 36.2 63.2 156.2 328.3 12.4 49.1 71.0 2 Nooken Nooken-К 37.5 35.2 62.1 164.4 27.9 325.4 8.5 342.6 58.7 75.1 3 Sakaldy Taimonku 38.2 36.5 65.4 165.2 321.4 336.5 62.2 68.8 4 Shaidan Shaidan-Каrа-Ungurrаrа-Ungur-Ungur 35.4 35.0 64.4 322.5 17.3 63.3 69.1 5 Shaidan Aikol-Suu 37.4 35.0 65.5 329.9 17.3 63.3 35.0 69.1 6 Aral Aral-Sai 38.2 36.2 67.3 159.4 330.0 340.8 68.0 39.2 70.9 7 Sakaldy Sakaldy-Suu 38.5 36.5 61.3 329.5 62.2 68.8 Total for rayon: 18 38 36 64 161 28 327 14 343 63 70

Crop yield in Kara-Ungur-Sai-Nookat rayon for 2018 Crop yields in c/ha Name of Aiyl No. Name of WUA winter maize for permanent Okmotu cotton grain maize onion potatoe tabacco vegetables oilseeds gourd field rice gardens wheat silage grasses Nooken rayon 1 Masy Murat-Murap 38.3 36.7 61.5 164.3 333.1 12.4 69.8 72.8 2 Nooken Nooken-К 37.8 35.7 59.8 167.5 331.1 8.5 339.0 72.6 71.1 3 Sakaldy Taimonku 37.7 37.0 61.6 336.3 349.4 73.4 77.9 4 Shaidan Shaidan-Каrа-Ungurrаrа-Ungur-Ungur 37.3 35.5 59.1 323.3 12.4 72.3 71.3 5 Shaidan Aikol-Suu 37.3 35.5 62.3 323.6 12.4 72.3 37.1 71.3 6 Aral Aral-Sai 38.5 36.5 64.6 167.7 341.5 362.9 72.3 39.1 75.2 7 Sakaldy Sakaldy-Suu 37.7 37.0 57.6 336.3 349.4 73.4 72.2 Total for rayon: 18 38 36 61 167 332 11 344 73 73 Chief specialist of Nooken WUA RSU Bakirov Sh.

45 Several meetings of PIU and PIC on the implementation of this subcomponent were held to mobilize communities where they discussed by whom the mobilization would be carried out, number of CDTs (in PAM it is stated that CDTs will be created on the basis of one CDT per 1800 ha) for the optimal work of recruited specialists and community contracts for rehabilitation of tertiary and quaternary canals.

The PIU offered to discuss the following:

1. To consider it appropriate for PIC to act in partnership with a local firm or NGO with expertise in community mobilization and capacity-building of WUAs to achieve intermediate outputs 1 and 2. Terms of recruitment shall be agreed with PIU and Terms of References shall be developed for the mobilization company taking into account PIU recommendations.

2. Contracts at the WUG level shall not be awarded because WUG does not have a legal status. All contracts and agreements shall be concluded at the WUA level.

3. For all selected off-farm canals the main consumers of irrigation water are WUAs, therefore to create GDTs based on one CDT per 3 or 4 WUAs.

4. To consider 10% reduction of concrete works on off-farm canals (primary and secondary) and 15% -on-farm canals (tertiary and quaternary) advisory and preliminary. Final scope of concrete works on subprojects (primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary) shall be determined on the basis of prepared design and estimate documentation.

5. The community contribution in the form of funds or in the form of labor power in the amount of 30% of the total cost of works shall be reduced to 5%. The terms of the community contribution shall be considered after further clarification of the issue.

6. The PIC shall develop manual on demonstration sites and submit PIU and ADB for review.

The PIU and PIC jointly developed ToR for a sub-consulting company to undertake community mobilization and agreed it with ADB. 4. APPENDIX. TABLE OF CONTRACT AWARDS AND DISBURSEMENTS BY YEARS

Cost, US$ Contract date Disbursements by years (projected/actual) Contract Outputs Contract title (evaluated/ (projected/ no. contract) actual) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Goods

Output 1 DWR-G- Heavy machinery for 800 000 26.03.2021 800 000 NCB-1 O&M of irrigation systems

Output 3 MOES-G- Heavy machinery for 9 000 000 15.08.20 900 000 8 100 000 ICB-1 Northern and Southern emergence responsive centers

Output 3 MOES-G- Equipment for 1 400 000 16.09.2022 140 000 1 260 000 ICB-2 hydrologic monitoring

Output 3 MOES-G- Computer equipment for 400 000 16.09.2022 40 000 360 000 NCB-1 data processing and forecasting

Works

Output 1 DWR-W- Off-farm canals and 4 144 000 24.11.2020 414 400 1 243 200 1 243 200 1 243 200 Contract Cost, US$ Contract date Disbursements by years (projected/actual) Outputs Contract title no. (evaluated/ (projected/ contract) actual) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 NCB-1 related works for subproject Pravaya Vetka

Output 1 DWR-W- Off-farm canals and 4 144 000 24.09.2021 414 400 1 243 200 1 243 200 1 243 200 NCB-X related works for additional subprojects

Output 1 DWR-W- Off-farm canals and 2 128 000 27.07.2021 212 800 638 400 638 400 638 400 NCB-X related works for additional subprojects

Output 1 DWR-W- Off-farm canals and 2 128 000 24.08.2021 212 800 638 400 638 400 638 400 NCB-X related works for additional subprojects

Output 2 CC-X On-farm canals and 1 120 000 16.06.2021 112 000 336 000 336 000 336 000 Communit related works for y subprojects Contracting for Work

Output 2 CC-X On-farm canals and 1 120 000 14.10.2021 112 000 336 000 336 000 336 000 Communit related works for y subprojects Contracting for Work

Output 2 CC-X On-farm canals and 1 120 000 02.08.2021 112 000 336 000 336 000 336 000 Communit related works for y subprojects Contracting

48 Contract Cost, US$ Contract date Disbursements by years (projected/actual) Outputs Contract title no. (evaluated/ (projected/ contract) actual) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 for Work

Output 2 CC-1 On-farm canals and 1 120 000 14.10.2021 112 000 336 000 336 000 336 000 related works for subprojects

Output 3 MOES-W- Works at hydrological 1 792 000 02.08.2021 896 000 896 000 NCB-1 monitoring stations

Consulting services

1 PIC-1 Project implementation 3 600 000 consultant 3 323 744 10.12.2019 332 374 531 799 531 799 531 799 531 799 531 799 332 374

2 AU-E-1 External audit services 60 000 60 000

3 AU-M-1 Audit of management 40 000 20 000 20 000 (IPIU)

4 AU-X-X Audit services 140 000 15.07.2020 35 000 35 000 35 000 35 000

5 MOES-C- Development of ToR 52 000 07.08.2020 5 200 46 800 NCB-1 for works of hydrologic monitoring stations

Total projected in USD: 34 031 744 332 374 1 871 399 12 985 799 6 749 999 7 313 999 4 430 799 367 374

49 Contract Cost, US$ Contract date Disbursements by years (projected/actual) Outputs Contract title no. (evaluated/ (projected/ contract) actual) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total actual in USD:

Total MoES KR 12 644 000 905 200 9 042 800 1 076 000 1 620 000

Total SAWR 21 387 744 332 374 966 199 3 942 999 5 673 999 5 693 999 4 430 799 367 374 GoKR

50 5. APPENDIX. NEEDS OF MOES KR FOR ENGINEERING MACHINERY

Agreed Affirmed

By Deputy minister of MoES KR By Minister of MoES KR

______D.Alimbekov ______Z.Askarov

6 March 2020 6 March 2020

Demand of MoES KR for engineering machinery to be procured under ADB Climate Change and Disaster- Resilient Water Resources Sector Project (as of February 2020)

No. Need in machinery Unit South North Total Number Approximate Total amount, Notes unit price, US$ US$ 1 Crawler excavator with piece 3 3 6 6 174 220 1 045 320 ultra-long boom and bucket volume 0.4 - 0.5 m3 2 Crawler excavator with piece 3 2 5 5 140 558 702 790 bucket capacity 0,9- 1m3 and hydraulic hammer 3 Crawler excavator with Piece 3 4 6 6 203 775 1 222 650 bucket capacity 1.5 - 1.6 m3 and hydraulic hammer 4 Wheeled excavator piece 3 3 6 6 126 766 760 596 with bucket volume 0.9 - 1 m3 and hydraulic hammer 5 Wheeled loader with piece 4 4 8 8 82 404 659 232 bucket volume of 3 m Sub-total: 16 15 31 31 4 390 588 1 Bulldozer with rear piece 4 3 7 7 174 333,33 1 220 333,31 ripper (three-rack- mount) 2 Autograder piece 1 1 2 2 271 666,67 543 333,33 3 Autocranes (weight- piece 2 2 4 4 142 500 570 000 carrying capacity 30 tons) Sub-total: 7 6 13 13 2 333 666,64 1 Crane manipulator piece 2 2 4 4 79 500 318 000 with board, carryng capacity 10 tons

2 Crane manipulator piece 2 2 4 4 118 400 473 600 with semitrailer, carryng capacity 16 tons No. Need in machinery Unit South North Total Number Approximate Total amount, Notes unit price, US$ US$ 3 Tipper lorry/dump piece 2 2 4 4 41 750 167 000 truck carryng capacity 15 tons 4 Tipper lorry/dump piece 3 3 6 6 48 800 292 800 truck carryng capacity 25 ton Sub-total: 9 9 18 18 1 251 400 5 Semi-trailer, carrying piece 2 2 4 4 72 800 291 200 capacity 40 tons 6 Off road trekker truck piece 2 2 4 4 72 800 291 200 with low loading trawl, carrying capacity 40 tons 7 Mobile workshop piece 1 1 2 2 95 500 191 000 8 Oil tank truck, 10 tons piece 2 2 4 4 60 666 242 664 Sub-total: piece 7 7 14 14 1 016 064 1 Mini bus 14-15 seats piece 1 1 2 2 30 000 60 000 2 Pickup (cargo- piece 1 1 2 2 20 000 40 000 passenger) Sub-total: 2 2 4 4 100 000 Total: 41 39 80 80 9 091 718,64

TC chairman:

Head of Weapon and Technology Unit of Rear Department, MoES KR- A.Aidarov

TC members:

Head of Population Protection and Territorial Defense Department, MoES KR- A.Chekirbaev

Head of Production Technology Department, MoES KR- H.Mallaev

Head of Procurement Unit, MoES KR- A.Abdrahmanov

Senior officer of International Cooperation Department, MoES KR- M.Isakzhanova

Head of Southern Emergency Responsive Center, MoES KR- K.Keldibekov

Head of Northern Emergency Responsive Center, MoES KR- E.Tursunkulov

Head of Emergency Prevention and Control Department, MoES KR- A. Zakirov 6. APPENDIX. OUTCOMES OF THE INVENTORY SURVEY OF GAUGING STATIONS OF KYRGYZHYDROMET UNDER THE MINISTRY OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS WITH IDENTIFICATION OF THE FINAL LIST OF OBSERVATION STATIONS

In January and March 2020 K.I.Djakipova, hydromet specialist of the ADB Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project, together with the Technical Coordinating Council of MoES KR carried out an inventory of gauging and meteorological stations (with site visits) of Chui, Batken, Jalal-Abad and Osh oblasts. About 65 operating and closed gauging and meteorological stations were visited to select hydroposts for rehabilitation under the project. During the inventory preliminary negotiations were held with the heads of Aiyl Okmotu on land acquisition for the newly opened hydroposts. Based on the results of field surveys, the following were selected from 65 observation stations for modernization and rehabilitation:

Chui basin:

Chui oblast: 1. Gauging station on river -Cholok village (non-opearting). The station is located on the Chu River in Kemin rayon, Chui oblast. At the time of inspection of the hydrological post it was revealed that there is no service- residential unit, there is a cradle crossing, construction is incomplete, as earlier during construction the technical requirements for hydrometric structures were violated. Complete reconstruction of hydrometric crossing and hydropost facilities is required. There is no crane on the cradle crossing. The location of the discharge site was not selected successfully, a non-standard permanent bench mark is installed, binding to the State control network is required. It is advisable to move the hydrometric crossing 15 m downstream of the river. There is no State Act on the right to use the land plot, so land acquisition is necessary. The observation data at the post are necessary for integrated water resources management and for water level forecasting of the Chu river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of an office -residential unit. Upon preliminary opinion of specialists, installation of Automated Hydrological Complex (AHC) is possible.

2. Gauging station on Chong Kemin river –mouth of Karagaily Bulak. The closed station is located on Chong Kemin river in Kemin rayon, Chui oblast. It worked from 1950 till 1996. At the time of inspection of the station it was revealed that the service - residential unit was privatized, there is no communication, there are no power transmission lines (the nearest lines are about 6 km from the station). The hydropost was equipped with two cradle crossings, and one has now been preserved in good condition. The observation data at the post are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Chu river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of an office- residential unit. According to the preliminary opinion of specialists, at present due to the powerful ice phenomena on the river, it is not possible to decide on the installation of AHC. 3. Gauging station on Ysyk-Ata river –mouth of Tuyuk (Yurievka). The station worked from 1926 to 1995, it is located on Ysyk-Ata river in Ysyk-Ata rayon, Chui oblast. Its service -residential unit is privatized. The hydrometric crossing has been destroyed. The observation data of the hydropost are necessary for integrated water resources management, for water level and mudflow hazard forecasting of the Chu river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of an office -residential unit. Possibility of installing AHC will be determined as a result of a more complete survey of the observation site. The land acquisition is required.

4. Gauging station on Ala-Archa river-mouth of Kashka-Suu (instead of hydropost on Ala- Archa river- 8 km up the mouth of Adygine river) The station is located on Ala-Archa river in Alamedin rayon, Chui oblast. It is a strategic communication hydropost for the big city. There is no service -residential unit (burned down as a result of fire). At the time of inspection of the hydropost, it was revealed that the station has an AHC installed by WB project, the post devices installed earlier by the MoES are in good condition, but do not meet the measurement requirements. The observation data at the post are necessary for integrated water resources management and for water level forecasting of the Chu river, the hydrological post needs to be modernized with construction of a modern service-residential unit with full facilities and modern conference hall. There is a land plot. It is decided to organize this hydropost as a demonstration observation point.

Naryn oblast:

5. Gauging station on Suek river – mouth of Ichke-Sai river (closed). The station is located on Suek river in rayon, oblast. It worked from 1928 to 1998. At the time of inspection of the hydropost there is no communication, there is no power transmission line. It has a cradle crossing. The service- residential unit is privatized. Since the observation data at the post are necessary for integrated water resources management and for water level forecasting of Chu river, the hydrological post is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of a service -residential unit; due to the powerful ice phenomena on the river during the inspection of the hydropost, the decision on installation of AHC has not been taken. It is necessary to acquire the land plot.

6. Gauging station on Karakol river-mouth of Irisuu river (closed). The station is located on Karakol river in Kochkor rayon, Naryn oblast. It worked from 1928 to 1999. There is no communication, there is no power transmission line, the power transmission lines are about one km from the hydropost. It has a cradle crossing, on the former place there are old supports of the destroyed well, on the bank of the river there is an old house privatized by the former observer. Construction of a new service- residential unit is required. There is no State Act on the right to use the land plot, so it is necessary to acquire the land plot. The observation data at the hydropost are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Chu river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of a service-residential unit. Due to the powerful ice phenomena on the river during the inspection of the hydropost, the decision on installation of AHC has not been taken.

7. Gauging station on Kara Kudjur river- -Sary-Bulak (closed). The station is located on river Kara Kudjur в in Kochkor rayon, Naryn oblast. It worked from 1926 to 1999. At the time of inspection of the hydropost it was revealed that the service and residential unit have been privatized. There is communication. The cradle crossing, old supports, cables, two permanent bench marks are preserved, the well was destroyed. There is no state act on the right to use the land plot. It is necessary to acquire the land plot. The observation data at the hydropost are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Chu river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of a service- residential unit. Due to the powerful ice phenomena on the river during the inspection of the hydropost, the decision on installation of AHC has not been taken.

8. Gauging station on Kochkor river-Kochkor village. It is closed, worked from 1913 till 1987. It is located on Kochkor river in Kochkor rayon, Naryn oblast, at the confluence of Suek and Karakol rivers. At the time of inspection of the hydropost it was revealed that there is no service -residential unit, there is communication, there are power transmission lines. The cradle crossing and hydrometric structures are preserved, but in emergency condition. Since there have been significant changes in the hydrographic network in the area, additional information collection and field studies are required before the flood period begins. The observation data at the hydropost are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Chu river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped with construction of a service- residential unit. Installation of AHC is possible. Land acquisition is required. Syrdarya river basin: Jalal-Abad oblast: 9. Gauging station on Saidan-Sai river- Shaidan-Sai village (operating)

The gauging station is located on Shaidan-Sai river in Nooken rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast. It is working. It is a regime and communication hydropost. At the time of inspection of the hydropost, it was revealed that the gauging station was completely destroyed due to deformation of the river bed. Since the observation data at the hydropost are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of Shaidan-Sai river, the hydropost is proposed to be constructed antd fully equipped, including AMS (automatic meteorological station) with a standard set of sensors, AHC (automatic hydrological complex), construction of hydrometric crossing with hydropost devices and a service -residential unit for observer. The land plot is available.

On three following photos specialists inspect the hydropost on Shaidan-Sai river –Shaidan village:

Photo 1. Hydropost on Shaidan-Sai river- Shaidan village Photo 2. Hydropost on Shaidan –Sai river-Shaidan village

Photo 3. Hydropost on Shaidan-Sai river-Shaidan village 10. Gauging station on Kegart river-Kanzhyga. The station worked from 1926 to 1995. The hydropost devices are not preserved. The data of the hydrological post are necessary for water level modelling and forecasting of the Kegart river and for full precipitation accumulation recording in the Kegart river basin, construction of a hydrometric crossing and hydropost devices, installation of AMS with a full set of sensors, AHC, as well as construction of a service and residential unit is proposed. It is necessary to acquire the land plot. Several sites were surveyed:

Photo 4. Site study of Kegart-Kanzhyga river Photo 5. Site study of Kegart-Kanzhyga river

10 а. Gauging station on Kegart river- Mikhailovka village The station is located on Kegart river in Suzak rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast. It is operating. Repair of hydropost devices and remote installation of ГР-70 is required. This scheme was included for modeling, and due to the small volume of works the hydromet specialists insist on the construction of the previously closed hydropost Kegart-Kanzhyga.

Photo 6. Gauging station on Kegart river- Mikhailovka village Photo 7. Gauging station on Kegart- Mikhailovka village

Photo 8. Gauging station on Kegart river –Mikhailovka village

11. Gauging station on river-mouth of Ters river. It is closed. The station is located not far from Ak-Tash village in Chatkal rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast. It worked from 1915 to 1993. The cradle crossing is in operational condition and used by the local residents for crossing. There is no communication, there are no power transmission lines. There is no land plot. Observation data of the hydropost are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Chatkal river, so it is necessary to equip the hydropost with devices, remote setting-up ГР-70 for water flow measurement, AMS with a full set of sensors, AHC and to construct a service- residential unit to acquire the land plot.

Photo 9. Gauging station on Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river

Photo 10. Gauging station on Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river Photo 11. Gauging station on Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river

Photo 12. Gauging station on Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river Photo 13. Gauging station on Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river

Photo 14. Gauging station on Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river 12. Gauging station on Gava-Sai river –mouth of Ters river. Closed gauging station is located on river Gava-Sai in Ala-Buka rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast. It operated from 1932 to 1996. The river is vulnerable to mudflow, observation data are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the river Gava-Sai. The hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped including AMS (automatic meteorological station) with a full set of sensors, construction of a hydrometric bridge with hydropost devices and construction of a service - residential unit for observer. Land acquisition is required.

Photo 15. Gauging station on Gava-Sai river-mouth of Ters river Photo 15. Gauging station on Gava-Sai river-mouth of Ters river

13. Gauging station on Padysha –Ata river –mouth of Tostu river. The station is operating and in working condition, it was built in 1985, after mudflow flood in 2018 the hydropost devices were damaged, which need to be repaired. The Padysha-Ata river basin is pilot for the implementation of the Water Code with regard to the implementation of water resources management by the Basin Councils of the Kyrgyz Republic and at the national level. Since the data of hydropost observations are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Padysha-Ata river, the hydropost shall be repaired and completely re-equipped, AHC shall be installed with construction of a service- residential unit. Photo 15. Gauging station on Padysha –Ata river –mouth of Tostu river.

Photo 16. Gauging station on Padysha –Ata river –mouth of Tostu river Photo 17. Gauging station on Padysha –Ata river –mouth of Tostu river

Photo 18. Gauging station on Padysha –Ata river –mouth of Tostu river 14. Gauging station on Torkent river-Torkent village

The station is closed and located in Toktogul rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast. It worked from 1966 till 1997. The river flows into the Toktogul reservoir. Recommencement of observations on the site of the earlier hydropost is possible, the river bed meets the requirements for the choice of hydraulic solution. Installation of AMS with a standard set of sensors and installation of AHC is expedient at the station. Observation data are necessary for integrated water resources management and for afflux forecasting of the Torkent river to the Toktogul reservoir. Construction and installation of a hydrometric crossing, all hydropost devices and full equipment, as well as construction of a service- residential unit is proposed. There is no land acquisition.

Photo 19. Gauging station on Torkent river-Torkent village Photo 20. Gauging station on Torkent river-Torkent village

Osh oblast:

15. Gauging station on Abshyr-Sai-Uch-Terek village. The station was closed in 1996, it is located in Nookat rayon, Osh oblast. The service-residential unit was privatized at the closure of the hydropost, and the land plot is now privately owned. Therefore, the specialists of Kyrgyzhydromet considered two plots in the upper part of the Abshyr-Sai river belonging to the Aiyl Okmotu. The most suitable place was near hydropost No. 5. The river is vulnerable to mudflow. Observation data are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Abshyr-Sai river. The hydropost is proposed to be constructed and fully equipped, including AMS (automatic meteorological station) with a standard set of sensors, AHC (automatic hydrological complex), construction of a hydrometric bridge with devices and construction of a service -residential unit for observer. Photo 21. Gauging station on Abshyr-Sai-Uch-Terek village.

16. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-mouth of Min-Teke. It is an operating station in Aravan rayon, Osh oblast. The service-residential unit and post devices are in emergency condition. Since the data of hydropost observations are necessary for integrated water resources management and water level forecasting of the Ak-Buura river, the hydropost needs to be repaired and completely re-equipped. AHC, AMS with a full set of sensors shall be installed with construction of a service - residential unit for observer.

Photo 22. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-mouth of Min-Teke. Service-residential unit. Photo 23. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-mouth of Min-Teke river

17. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-Papan village. The station was closed in 1995, it worked from 1912. At the time of the inspection of the hydropost it was revealed that the area on the site of the closed hydropost was occupied by a private person. On the proposed site there is a fishing farm through which an access way passes. The right bank section of the river is privately owned; the left bank belongs to the DWR. Since observation data are necessary for its afflux to the Papan reservoir, then water flow measurement is rather within the competence of the SAWR. Kyrgyzhydromet is considering two options - to open a hydropost higher up the river or to replace the construction of this hydropost by construction of an office -residential unit to create working conditions for the Joint Hydrometeorological Station (JHMS), which is responsible for organization of work, methodological and technical control of attached hydroposts, performs primary processing of hydrological monitoring data and prepares data for Annual Dry Land Data (ADLD). Uzgen JHMS will be authorized to represent Kyrgyzhydromet in the Basin Council as a responsible station for hydrological monitoring when implementing IWRM. The works carried out by Uzgen JHMS are necessary for integrated water resources management and for water level forecasting of the rivers of the Syrdarya river basin and therefore it is proposed to build a service-residential unit of Uzgen JHMS with the equipment of workplaces (currently the building of Uzgen JHMS is in emergency condition). Photo 24. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-Papan village

Photo 25. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-Papan village Photo 26. Gauging station on Ak-Buura river-Papan village

18. Gauging station on Aravan-Sai river –Jangy-Nookat village. The station is operational. Complete re-equipment of the hydropost with the replacement of the cradle crossing built in 1986 is required. There is no electricity and no communication. Observational data are needed for integrated water resources management.

Photo 27. Gauging station on Aravan-Sai river-Jangy-Nookat village Photo 28. Gauging station on Aravan-Sai river-Jangy-Nookat village

Photo 29. Gauging station on Aravan-Sai river-Jangy-Nookat village

19. Gauging station on Kara-Kulzha river-Ak-Tash village. The station was closed, it operated from 1937 to 2006. It is located on the upper reaches of Kara Kulzha river. Observational data is needed for integrated water management and water level forecasting of the Kara Kulzha river after its merging with the river forming the Karadarya river. It is necessary to build and install a hydrometric crossing, all hydropost devices, AMS, a service- residential unit for observer. The issue of installation of AHC shall be resolved after inspection by the consultant.

Photo 30. Gauging station on Kara-Kulja river –Ak-Tash village

Photo 31. Gauging station on Kara-Kulja river –Ak-Tash village 20. Snow-avalanche station (SAS)-Kara-Tash village (instead of the previously stated hydropost on Chu river-Milyanfan village).

It was decided to open a snow-avalanche station in Kara-Kulzha rayon, Osh oblast on the avalanche- prone section of Myrza-ake-Alaiku road, as the area allows to carry out observations of meteorological parameters according to the full program of observations and route observations of snow cover and formation of avalanches. Observational data are needed for integrated water resource management and water level forecasting of the Karadarya river tributaries. It is necessary to build a service-residential unit for the snow-avalanche station with full equipment of workplaces and living rooms for the station staff and to install AMS.

Photo 32. Snow-avalanche station (SAS)-Kara-Tash

Photo 33. Snow- avalanche station (SAS)- Kara-Tash. Avalanche formation site on Myrza- Ake-Alaiku road. Final list of hydroposts are resulted in the table below

Table: Geographical coordinates of 20 hydraulic posts proposed to be rehabilitated

No. Hydropost name Location Geographical coordinates 1 Cu river-Cholok village Kemin rayon, Chui oblast Latitude: 42°43´291 North Longitude: 75°50´316 East Altitude:1220m 2 Chong-Kemin river-mouth of Karagaily- Chong-Kemin rayon, Chui oblast Latitude: 42°18´131 North Bulak Longitude: 76°23´792 East Altitude -2033m 3 Ysyk-Ata river- -up the mouth of Tuiuk Ysyk-Ata rayon, Chui oblast Latitude: 42°39´571 North river (Yurievka village) Longitude: 75°02´572 East Altitude -1290m 4 Ala-Archa river-mouth of Kashka-Suu Alamudun rayon, Chui oblast Latitude: 42°38´854 North river (instead of hydropost Ala-Archa Longitude: 74°29´713 East river-mouth of Adygene river) Altitude -1578m 5 Suek river-mouth of Ichke-Sai river Kochkor rayon, Naryn oblast Latitude: 42°11´765 North Longitude: 75°10´651 East Н-2320m 6 Karakol river-mouth of Irisuu river Kochkor rayon, Naryn oblast Latitude: 42°18´607 North Longitude: 75°07´140 East. Н-2476m 7 Kara-Kujur river-Sary-Bulak village Naryn rayon, Naryn oblast Latitude: 42°18´607 North Longitude: 75°07´139 East Altitude -2246m 8 Kochkor river-Kochkor village Kochkor rayon, Naryn oblast Latitude: 42°12´943 North Longitude: 75°41´715 East Altitude -1811m 9 Shaidan-Sai river-Shaidan village Nooken rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast Latitude: 41°09´932 North Longitude: 72°43´223 East Altitude -1003m 10 Kegart river-Kanzhyga village (instead Suzak rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast Latitude: 41°07´987 North of Kegart river- Mikhailovka village) Longitude: 73°34´062 East Altitude 1790m 11 Chatkal river-mouth of Ters river Chatkal rayon, Jalal-Abad obalst Latitude: 41°41´601 North Longitude: 70°3´488 East Altitude -1359m 12 Gavai-Sai river-mouth of Ters river Ala-Buka rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast Latitude: 41°13´946 North Longitude: 70°52´623 East. Altitude -1715m 13 Padysha-Ata-mouth of Tostu river Aksy rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast Latitude: 41°36´018 North Longitude: 71°39´225 East Altitude -1504m 14 Torkent river-Torkent village Toktogul rayon, Jalal-Abad oblast Latitude: 41°53´330 North (instaed of Chu river-Nijne-Chuisky Longitude: 73°09´582 East village) Altitude -933m 15 Abshir-Sai river-Uch-Terek village Nookat rayon, Osh oblast Latitude: 40°10´962 North Longitude: 72°21´796 East Altitude -1598m 16 Ak-Buura river-mouth of Min-Teke Aravan rayon, Osh oblast Latitude: 39°56´909 North Longitude: 72°47´961 East Altitude -2362m 17 Ak-Buura river –mouth of Papan (at a Kara-Suu rayon, Osh oblast Latitude: 40°29´642 North decision stage) Longitude: 72°49´726 East Altitude -1320m 18 Aravan-Sai river-Jangy-Nookat village Nookat rayon, Osh oblast Latitude: 40°10´181 North (instead of hydropost Kyrgyz-Ata river- Longitude: 72°39´243 East Kyrgyz-Ata village) Altitude -1610m 19 Kara-Kulzha river-Ak-Tash village Kara-Kulzha, Osh oblast Latitude: 40°37′001 North (instead of Kara-Darya river-Uzgen) Longitude:73°35′243 East Altitude -1800m No. Hydropost name Location Geographical coordinates 20 SAS-уKara-Tash village (instead ofKara-Tash village(insteadof Kara-Kulzha, Osh oblast Latitude: 40°38´290 North hydropost Chu river-Milyanfan village) Longitude:73°41´428 East Altitude -1740m 7. APPENDIX. PROJECT PROGRAMME 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Task ID Task Description Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

D-1 Project Inception 1 Kick-off meeting in Bishkek 2 Review PAM, RRP and supplementary documents 3 Focus group discussions with SAWR, MOES, PIU 4 Prepare Prepare Project Implementation Plan 5 Prepare Initial Project Programme for Outputs 1,2 & 3 6 Prepare Initial (Inception) Report 8 Client Review 10 Client approval of Implentation Plan 11 Inception Report Revision and final approval

D-2 Progress Reporting 1 Prepare Quarterly Progress Report 2 Prepare Annual Progress Report 3 Prepare Interim (Mid Term) Report 4 Client review / approval 5 Final submission of Interim Report 6 Draft Final Report 7 Client review / approval 8 Final Report

D-3 Financial Management 1 Financial Management System and Monitoring Set-Up 2 Financial Management Workshop with PIU, DWR, and MOES 3 Prepare Training Manual on financial management to match ADB requirements 4 Finalize project completion report

D-4 Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Coordination with MOES, DWR, WUAs and PIU for establishing an M&E system 2 Establish project performance monitoring system 3 a. Project Design and Monitoring Framework DMF) 4 b. Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy (SPRSS) 5 c. Gender Action Plan (GAP) 6 Support PIU with Monitoring and Evaluation activities

D-5 Output 1&2: Irrigation Infrastructure Modernization and Capacity Building Preparation of Design and NGO Sub-consultant Agreement Tri-lateral Agreement Signed

D-5.1 Pravaya Vetka Subproject 1 Advanced Action Public Information Campaign Establishment of CDTs Establishment of SCC 2 Mobilisation Phase Strengthening Institutional and Technical Capacity of WUAs Joint Identificationand Priority Ranking of Irrigation Infrastructure Works 3 Preparation of detailed design Preparation of Detailed Designs Tendering of Off-Farm Civil Works Packages Preparation of On-Farm Community Contracting Proposals 4 Construction Phase Land Acquisition & Contractor Mobilisation Execution of Main Civil Works Execution of Community Civil Works 5 Management Phase Formulation and Execution of Joint SAWR-WUA Irrigation Management Plan Development and Execution of Agriculture & OFWM Plans Monitoring and Assessment of WUA and SAWR Performance

D-5.2 Output 1&2: Subprojects 2,3 & 4

1 Subproject Selection Phase Recruitment of Subconsultants Assessment of Subproject's Eligibility Preparation of Subproject Implementation Plan 2 Advanced Action Public Information Campaign Establishment of CDTs Establishment of SCC Pre-Feasibility Study 3 Mobilisation/Feasibility Phase Strengthening Institutional and Technical Capacity of WUAs Joint Identificationand Priority Ranking of Irrigation Infrastructure Works Feasibility Study Preparation of Environmental and Social Safeguarding Documents 4 Design and Procurement Phase Preparation of Detailed Designs Tendering of Main Civil Works Packages Preparation of Community Contracting Proposals 5 Pre-Construction Phase Land Acquisition & Contractor Mobilisation 6 Construction Phase Execution of Main Civil Works Execution of Community Civil Works 7 Management Phase Formulation and Execution of Joint SAWR-WUA Irrigation Management Plan Development and Execution of Agriculture & OFWM Plans Monitoring and Assessment of WUA and SAWR Performance

D-7 Output 3: Disaster Risk Management D-7.1 Emergency Response Centres Legend: 1 Heavy Machinery Procurement Activity Review PAM and associated documents for heavy machinery Intermittent activity Prepare Tender Documents for Heavy Machinery Critical path activity Invite bids for Heavy Machinery Event/Milestone Deliverable/Critical milestone Period for bid preparation Bid submission Prepare bid evaluation report Contract negotiations Contract award 2 Heavy Machinery Delivery 3 Heavy Machinery Training 4 Prepare Operation and Maintenance Plan 5 Training for disaster risk management Review of existing disaster risk management Develop training plan for disaster risk management Prepare Training Manual Mobilise ERC & MOES teams Commence training of ERC & MOES on disaster risk management

D-8 Output 3: Hydromet D-8.2 Hydromet Stations 1 Hydromet Review and Design Review PAM and associated documents for Hydromet Stations Data collection Prepare ToR document for enhancement data collection, processing, and warning based Preparation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) 2 Procurement Phase Prepare bidding documents for hydromet stations Invite bids Period for bid preparation Bid submission Bid evaluation Prepare bid evaluation report Contract negotiations Contract award 3 Implementation Phase Supply of equipment, construction and installation Implement pilot data collection, processing, and forecasting system Prepare Operation and Maintenance Plan Develop and mobilize hydromet training