DOCSLIB.ORG

Compassion Is an Act of Courage by Rev. Sue Greer, UUSD Member July 30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compassion Is an Act of Courage by Rev. Sue Greer, UUSD Member July 30 Compassion is an Act of Courage By Rev. Sue Greer, UUSD Member July 30. 2017 A Sermon for the Unitarian Universalists of Southern Delaware Compassion is an act of courage, the courage of an open heart! Buddha’s teaching tells us that all beings are born into suffering and that the antidote to that suffering is the “awakening” of the compassionate heart. It is the belief that within all of us is the latent wish for all beings to be well and free of suffering. Compassion for all, this is a strong and relevant teaching, especially in our world today that seems full of hatred, greed, and suffering that divide and separate us. Finding our open- heartedness breaks down these barriers of separation of self and other, and helps us find our way. We hear the cries of suffering; your suffering or my suffering, there is no difference, our suffering is the same, and this becomes our freedom, to step outside our suffering, accept it. So we can courageously love ourselves and all living beings. I wanted to talk here today about compassion from my studies and my own experiences. I come to you as one who has been a Buddhist for over 30 years and have worked on my own self-awareness and open heartedness for most of my life. And as my family can say, I still can react in anger, have unkind thoughts, and judgements, but one thing I have done is taken a vow to offer compassion whenever possible and to live in compassion. I have dedicated myself to living a life of love and kindness. As Unitarians, I hear that same dedication when we say we want to create a compassionate world, but what are we committing ourselves to? What do we mean by compassion and how do we grow a compassionate heart? Buddha teaches that suffering and compassion are two conditions of all beings. Everyone grows old, experiences the weakness of disease, and will inevitably die. This seems simple: we live, we all experience loss and suffering, we will die. But right alongside of our suffering is our inherent release of that suffering, through compassion. Compassion is UNITY, open-heartedness, nonviolence, nonjudgement, freedom from prejudice for ALL beings, and all life. It’s the foundation of tolerance, patience, understanding, and forgiveness. Whereas suffering creates separation, division, fear, anger. We isolate into them and us. Enemy is created. We close our hearts. Greed is born. What binds us as humans are these two forces: our innate compassion and inevitable suffering. When have you felt yourself harden your heart, turn away from suffering, close down, not listen to another’s story of pain? It’s just too much. You recoil, your body tightens, you want to avert your eyes, walk faster… Hope the light changes so you don’t have to look at the street person begging for money at the red light. When you can’t stand to hear one more time about your friend’s struggle or fears and then the voice goes off in your head... “Oh, stop whining. Do we have to hear this again?” Or “he doesn’t need my money; he’s just going to drink it away.” JUDGEMENT, FEAR, ANGER, INTOLERANCE. Where does this come from? Where are these hard places hiding in you? The Dali Lama teaches us that if your compassion doesn’t include yourself it is incomplete. Clearing away your own prejudices, your own fears is a key to growing more compassion. And here is where courage comes in. What are your prejudices? What is your unique or cherished suffering that closes you or separates you? I wanted to share a story, my own experience, what I learned about BLIND Hatred. I would often say, with my liberal pride: I just can’t tolerate those BIGOTS, those hateful people who hate, just to hate. For years I held this stance. I was RIGHTEOUS! I thought myself to be without prejudice, I LOVED EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING. I protested. I marched for the end of the Vietnam War. I marched for human rights, civil rights, women’s rights, gay rights. I marched for peace. If there was an injustice, something to stand for, I was there. In 1970, I supported myself by selling my paintings, baked bread, crafts, and beads on the streets of Pittsburgh near Carnegie-Mellon University. I lived in a commune and looked like the classic hippie artist. You get the picture…bell-bottoms, long braids, moccasins, and I wore a beret. That day we were protesting the WAR. “NO WAR,” we chanted, “NO WAR.” We had signs, drums, chants… Then we saw them coming at us with such a rushing, it looked like a group of joggers coming up to join us. But as they came in to view, we heard: “Dirty hippies!” With this they started throwing garbage at us…spitting on us. We kept walking... Get out. Get a job! Commie scum! Cursing and spitting hate! Then I felt something hit me on the side of the head. A beer can, a full beer can. It hit so hard it broke my glasses and blood flowed from my eyebrow. Hate and pain. My tears were from their yelling...and all I heard in my head was: WHY? They didn’t know me… I loved the soldiers, I loved my country. We wanted the same thing… THEY HATED ME. Blood and tears flowing across my face I stepped out of our circle only to have one man standing in front of me, face to face. I had to stop and look at him. He wasn’t seeing me...only what he hated. Hate and fear… GET OUT F...Hippie! I was shaking as one of my friends grabbed my arm and pulled me away from the VIOLENT rageful man At that moment, fear and anger overwhelmed me. My defenses went up. I was him… he was me and we didn’t know anything about each other. Just that he was THEM and I was US… I became hard hearted, I was now fighting the enemy. I had become the OTHER. It took me years to come to try to understand my experience of his blind hatred. Raw hatred. Hatred that was blind to who was being hated. I wasn’t what the man thought me to be… and he wasn’t what I thought him to be. We stayed separate; we stayed enemies without ever knowing each other. I have since released my own hatreds, my own prejudices, at least the ones I know. I felt how powerful the fear and hatred are, and how my feeling them created my own pain and suffering. I had to let go of other people’s hate of me, otherwise I was bound to it, bound to that hate and my opposition bound me to them as enemy. This was the great wisdom of Dr. King’s peaceful, nonviolent, and non-hateful demonstrations. And he taught the teaching of Buddha: “Hatred can’t drive out hatred, only LOVE can do that.” This experience started me on a path to let go of my own judgments and my own hate; it’s an ongoing process. My second story I wanted to share is an experience I had that opened me to more compassion. In my healing practice through the 90s, I worked primarily with women who had been traumatized by sexual assault as children or adults. My work helped these women release their memories and fear and reclaim their lives. It was deep and meaningful work; I was honored and pleased to be able to relieve their suffering. I had a new client who had been referred by his psychotherapist to see if I could help him move through his debilitating grief, find forgiveness, and some peace from his pain. I wasn’t given any more information about him and I realized I would hear his STORY from him directly. He was about 26 years old and was obviously very nervous about being with me and seemed very disconnected from his body. I reassured him that he was safe with me. I was not here to judge him and I had heard many painful life stories and I assured him I could hear his. With this OK from me, we began his journey of healing. I used energy balancing and body techniques to help him reconnect to his body and release some of his trauma that he held onto so tightly. As our sessions continued, he finally revealed to me his suffering. “I hurt her. I didn’t’ mean to...I hurt her. A long pause. I forced her...I made her. He was confessing to me. I’ll never be forgiven! I never meant to...” At this moment, my stomach tightened, my heart closed and I could feel anger and judgement rise. “You disgusting shit.” My anger grew and I didn’t know what I was going to do with my own feelings. I realized I was with a rapist. All the women I had seen in my practice, so damaged and suffering from sexual assault! I was fierce in my anger and I wanted to scream at him, “Get out, you shit!” When in what seemed like the same moment, he said, “JUST LIKE DAD did to me.” I was pierced by his pain. ALL my anger drained out of me and I saw in front of me a wounded, hurt child. In that moment, I went from being angry and judgemental to experiencing an open heart.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neural Mechanism for Understanding Speakersâ Intentions
    Acoustics 08 Paris Neural mechanism for understanding speakers’ intentions: developmental analyses of children with and without communication disorders S. Imaizumi The Prefectural Univ. of Hiroshima, 1-1 Gakuen-machi, 723-0053 Mihara, Japan [email protected] 657 Acoustics 08 Paris Ability to understand speakers’ intentions through linguistic contents and affective prosody is examined for children between 5 and 12 years-old with and without communication disorders. Four types of spoken short phrases, expressing admiration, sarcasm, blame and humor or joke, were presented. For each stimulus, the subjects were asked to choose between two cards, one with a written word “praise” and another with “no praise” accompanied by corresponding drawings. For children without any communication disorders, the percentage of the correct judgment of speaker intentions was high and stable for admiration and blame phrases which have congruent linguistic and affective valences. It was significantly low for 6-year-old children and increased with age for the sarcastic or joking phrases which have incongruent linguistic and affective valences. The percent correct was significantly lower for autistic children than normally developing children particularly for the phrases with incongruent valences. Although a significant difference was found between children with severe- and mild-hearing impairment, no significant difference was found in the percent correct between the congruent and incongruent phrases for them. Based on these results together with brain activation analyses using fMRI, a model of neural mechanism for understanding speakers’ intentions is discussed. 1 Introduction 2 Method Phrases with positive linguistic meanings may convey All experiments in this study were conducted in accordance negative meanings when uttered with coldhearted emotion.
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTION 34 Hatred We Next Have to Consider the Vices Opposed To
    QUESTION 34 Hatred We next have to consider the vices opposed to charity: first, hatred, which is opposed to charity itself (question 34); second, acedia and envy, which are opposed to the joy of charity (questions 35-36); third, discord and schism, which are opposed to peace (questions 37-42); fourth, scandal and giving offense, which are opposed to beneficence and fraternal correction (question 43). On the first topic there are six questions: (1) Can God be hated? (2) Is hating God the greatest of sins? (3) Is hating one’s neighbor always a sin? (4) Is hating one’s neighbor the greatest of the sins against one’s neighbor? (5) Is hatred a capital vice? (6) From which of the capital sins does hatred arise? Article 1 Can God be hated? It seems that no one can hate God (Deum nullus odio habere possit): Objection 1: In De Divinis Nominibus, chap. 4, Dionysius says, “What is itself good and beautiful is lovable and delectable to everyone.” But God is goodness itself and beauty itself. Therefore, He cannot be hated by anyone. Objection 2: In the apocryphal books of Esdra it says, “All things call forth truth and do well in its works.” But as John 14:6 says, God is truth itself. Therefore, everyone loves God and no one can hate Him. Objection 3: Hatred is a certain sort of aversion. But as Dionysius says in De Divinis Nominibus, chap. 4, God “turns all things toward Himself.” Therefore, no one can hate Him. But contrary to this: Psalm 73:23 says, “The pride of those who hate You ascends continually,” and John 15:24 says, “But now they have both seen and hated me and my Father.” I respond: As is clear from what was said above (ST 1-2, q.
    [Show full text]
  • Insufficient Emotion: Soul-Searching by a Former Indicter of Strong
    Emotion Review Vol. 2, No. 3 (July 2010) 234–239 © 2010 SAGE Publications and The International Society for Research on Emotion Insufficient Emotion: Soul-searching by a Former ISSN 1754-0739 DOI: 10.1177/1754073910362598 Indicter of Strong Emotions er.sagepub.com George Loewenstein Department of Social & Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, USA Abstract Contrary to the many accounts of the destructive effects of strong emotions, this article argues that the most serious problems facing the world are caused by a deficiency rather than an excess of emotions. It then shows how an evolutionary account of emotion can explain when and why such deficiencies occur. Keywords decision making, emotion At that moment I was fully aware for the first time how far advanced the researchers have argued that these types of emotions are benefi- process of paralysis already was in me – it was if I were moving through cial, based on the finding that their absence, whether due to brain flowing, bright water without being halted or taking root anywhere, and I damage (Damasio, 1994) or experimental intervention (e.g., knew very well that this chill was something dead and corpse-like, not yet Wilson & Schooler, 1991) tends to degrade the quality of decision surrounded by the foul breath of decomposition but already numbed beyond recover, a grimly cold lack of emotions. making. Representing a similar perspective, there are myriad (Stefan Zweig, 1922 / 2004, p. 19) stories, presented in books such as The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us From Violence (De Becker, 1997), of Do emotions help or hurt decision making? This question has people who report having survived against the odds as a result of been the focus of much implicit and explicit debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Domination: Colonial Guilt and Postcolonial Hatred in J. M. Coetzee's Disgrace
    Sexual Domination: Colonial Guilt and Postcolonial Hatred in J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace Janet Migoyan Student [Should be like this. This is just to signify that the author does not represent a department] Vt 2021 Examensarbete för kandidatexamen, 15 hp Engelska Abstract J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace was published during a defining moment in South African history in 1999. Five years earlier Nelson Mandela had been elected president after the first general election. The healing process in a country divided by race and a history marked by racial crimes, committed under long time by collective actions of many generations of colonizers, was a decisive historical necessity. Disgrace illustrates the economical and emotional mechanisms of sexual exploitation of women in post- apartheid South African society. Those socioeconomic mechanisms are fueled by postcolonial hate, making the reconciliation process difficult in the new democracy. The aim of this bachelor project is to show how Coetzee’s Disgrace contextualizes the collective humanitarian guilt and disgrace caused by sexual oppression of woman and illustrates the challenges that post-apartheid South Africa faces to reconcile with the racial crimes committed during apartheid when sexual crimes continue under the historical shadow of colonial power and postcolonial hatred. Keywords: collective guilt, gender, race, sexual oppression, post-apartheid, colonialism, postcolonialism Table of contents 1.Introduction 5 2.Previous research 7 3. Gender aspects of postcolonial theory in Disgrace 9 4. Racial aspects of feminist theory in Disgrace 16 5. Whose disgrace? 20 6.Conclusion 21 7.Works Cited 22 1 Introduction J. M. Coetzee’s novel Disgrace was published in 1999 and is situated in South Africa during the post-apartheid period.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Aurel Kolnai Íngrid Vendrell Ferran PENULTIMATE DRAFT Published
    Aurel Kolnai Íngrid Vendrell Ferran PENULTIMATE DRAFT Published in: Landweer, Hilge, and Szanto, Thomas (eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotion, Routledge, 2020 Aurel Kolnai (1900–1973) is best known for his political and moral writings, but he also chiefly contributed to the phenomenology of the emotions. In a series of papers devoted to hostile and aversive emotions and, in particular, to disgust, haughty pride, fear, and hatred (Kolnai 1929, 1931, 1935 and 1998) Kolnai presents his most comprehensive views on the affective life and its ethical significance. Scattered discussions on the emotions can also be found in an early paper written on Scheler and under the influence of psychoanalysis (1925), in his dissertation Der ethische Wert und die Wirklichkeit (Ethical Value and Reality) (1927), which is his first phenomenological writing, and in later papers “On the Concept of the Interesting” (1964) and “The Concept of Hierarchy” (1971). This chapter is divided into four sections. The first reconstructs Kolnai’s general approach to the emotions as embedded within the larger context of early phenomenology. Sections 2–4 present Kolnai’s analyses of hostile emotions by focusing on disgust, haughty pride, and hatred. 1. Kolnai’s General Approach to the Emotions “Max Schelers Kritik und Würdigung der Freudschen Libidolehre” (Max Scheler’s Criticism and Praise of Freud’s Doctrine of the Libido) (1925), published in Imago, is the first writing in which Kolnai directly approaches the topic of the emotions. The text was written during a period in which Kolnai embraced psychoanalysis (he was trained in this movement by Ferenczi and Rank).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Compassion and Fraternity in Mahayana Buddhist Traditions
    Because Catholicism and Buddhism share the same aim—peace and greatness in humanity—the Great Compassion’s emphasis on the nonjudgmental and on removing the notion of races, hostili- ties, sexism, sexual orientations, and even the concept of national- ism and so forth, can benefit us all, whether we are from the East The Great Compassion or the West. Thus today I would like to share my understanding of the Great Compassion with you. and Fraternity in The Great Compassion is one of the important qualities of the Buddha, and it forms the basis of all perfections (pāramitās). It Maha¯ya¯na Buddhist is a chief aspiration for Mahāyāna practitioners to carry on their faith to save sentient beings and to carry on the Buddhist messages Traditions from one life to another life with passion. The Great Compassion Ven. Dr. Dhammadı¯pa Sak (Fa Yao 法曜) contains several important concepts in relation to human beings Chuang Yen Monastery regardless of their race, ethnicity, economic status, gender, and so forth; and it calls us to treat everyone as their own sister or brother. Therefore, this paper tries to establish the connection between the “Great Compassion” as a perfection of the Buddha and the impor- uddhism appeared in India 2,600 years ago as a “moral tance of “fraternity” for humanity today. revolution.” It inverted the accepted values and transferred the center of interest from the world without to the world The Great Compassion in Relation to Perfections (Pa¯ramita¯s) Bwithin. To the Buddha himself, creed and ritual and caste were The Great Compassion is one of the important qualities of the among the things that did not really matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Linguistic Interpretation of Emotional Prosody
    Cross Linguistic Interpretation of Emotional Prosody Åsa Abelin Jens Allwood Abstract This study has three purposes: the first is to study if there is consensus in the way listeners interpret different emotions and attitudes expressed by a Swedish speaker, the second is to see if this interpretation is dependent on the listeners’ cultural and linguistic background, and the third is to ascertain whether there is any reoccurring relation between acoustic and semantic properties of the stimuli. Recordings of a Swedish speaker uttering a phrase while expressing different emotions were interpreted by listeners with different first languages, Swedish, English, Finnish and Spanish, who were to judge the emotional contents of the expressions. The results show that some emotions, e.g. anger, fear, sadness and surprise, were interpreted in accordance with intended emotion to a greater degree than others, which were interpreted as expected to a lesser degree. Emotions were interpreted with different degrees of success depending on the first languages of listeners; native listeners were the most successful. The results suggest that emotions with similar semantic features, e.g. anger and dominance or fear and shyness have similar acoustic features e.g. short duration and strong intensity (anger and dominance) or longer duration and weak intensity (fear and shyness). Key words: Cross-linguistic interpretation, emotion, prosody 1. Introduction This study had the purposes of: (i) Investigating if there is any consensus in the way in which listeners interpret different emotions and attitudes expressed by a Swedish speaker (ii) Investigating if this interpretation is dependent on the cultural and linguistic background of the listener 1 (iii) Making acoustic analyses of the prosody of the stimuli used in the study, and making semantic analyses of the responses to the stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatise of Human Nature Book II: the Passions
    Treatise of Human Nature Book II: The Passions David Hume Copyright © Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is worth. Longer omitted passages are reported on, between [brackets], in normal-size type. First launched: June 2008 Contents Part ii: Love and hatred 147 1: The objects and causes of love and hatred............................................ 147 2: Experiments to confirm this system............................................... 149 3: Difficulties solved.......................................................... 154 4: Love for people with whom one has some connection..................................... 156 5: Esteem for the rich and powerful................................................ 158 6: Benevolence and anger...................................................... 162 7: Compassion.............................................................. 164 8: Malice and envy.......................................................... 166 9: The mixture of benevolence and anger with compassion and malice............................. 171 10: Respect and contempt....................................................... 174
    [Show full text]
  • 'Love and Hatred Are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation': Animal Feeling in the Century Before Darwin1
    1 ‘Love and Hatred are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation’: Animal Feeling in the Century before Darwin1 Jane Spencer Darwin was willing to discern a wide range of emotions in animals: not just those now considered basic in humans – anger, fear, sadness, disgust and enjoyment – but jealousy, pride, shame, ennui, wonder and curiosity. In Part I, chapter iii, of The Descent of Man (1871) he writes: Most of the more complex emotions are common to the higher animals and ourselves. Every one has seen how jealous a dog is of his master’s affection, if lavished on any other creature; and I have observed the same fact with monkeys. This shows that animals not only love, but have desire to be loved. Animals manifestly feel emula- tion. They love approbation or praise; and a dog carrying a basket for his master exhibits in a high degree self-complacency or pride. There can, I think, be no doubt that a dog feels shame, as distinct from fear, and something very like modesty when begging too often for food. ... Several observers have stated that monkeys certainly dislike being laughed at … Dogs show what may be fairly called a sense of humour, as distinct from mere play; if a bit of stick or other such object be thrown to one, he will often carry it away for a short distance; and then squatting down with it on the ground … will wait until his master comes quite close to take it away. The dog will then seize it and rush away in triumph, repeating the same manoeuvre, and evidently enjoying the practical joke.2 A monkey who disliked being laughed
    [Show full text]
  • Retributive Hatred As a Reactive Moral Attitude
    Retributive Hatred as a Reactive Moral Attitude Jeramy S. Gee A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Jean Roberts (Chair) Stephen Gardiner Ingra Schellenberg Cass Weller Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Philosophy ©Copyright 2014 Jeramy S. Gee University of Washington Abstract Retributive Hatred as a Reactive Moral Attitude Jeramy S. Gee Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Jean Roberts Department of Philosophy Philosophers’ attention to negative attitudes has grown in recent decades. However, whereas philosophers have offered a number of descriptions of, and justifications for, attitudes like resentment and contempt, hatred is usually met with antipathy even when we might be inclined to be sympathetic to the hater. In this dissertation I offer a sustained examination of hatred I and make a rather startling claim: There are cases of hatred that are morally justifiable. The kind of hatred I defend is what some philosophers have called retributive hatred. This is hatred adopted in response to wrongdoing and in which hostility is driven by a retributive notion of moral desert. To make my case I argue that retributive hatred is distinguishable from such attitudes as prejudicial hatred, malice, and spite—attitudes with which it is often confused—and that it is not liable to the kinds of criticisms that can be levied against these types of hatred. I then show that retributive hatred should be classified among the reactive attitudes. Thus there are conditions governing when retributive haters can be understood as properly representing their targets as hateful and I argue that these conditions can be met.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology of Hatred
    Send Orders of Reprints at [email protected] 10 The Open Criminology Journal, 2013, 6, 10-17 Open Access The Psychology of Hatred José I. Navarro*, Esperanza Marchena and Inmaculada Menacho Department of Psychology, University of Cadiz, Spain Abstract: Hatred is a deep and emotional extreme dislike. The objects of such hatred can vary extensively. Hatred is often associated with disposition towards hostility against the objects of hatred. And can drive oneself to extreme behaviors such as violence, murder, and war. In childhood and adolescence the attitudes of intolerance - impregnated with hatred – are formed, and these are extremely difficult to eradicate later. This paper goes through psychological perspective of hate and the different roles of cognition in hatred and violence. Then the duplex theory of hatred is presented considering some approaches to the origin of violent behaviors. Taking into consideration that complex problems do not respond to simple solutions, a potential alternative based on family and school education plays a major role. Learning conflict resolution based on negotiation and compromise seems essential, in addition to adopting intellectually and morally combative atti- tudes against violence. Keywords: Hatred, violence, cognition, automatic thoughts. INTRODUCTION Although most people are disgusted by the exercise of violence, there are certain circumstances in which any of us Hatred is a strong, negative feeling against the object of could do it. But it is hard to imagine how you can reach the the hatred. The hater sees the object of their hatred as bad, level of cruelty shown by the graffiti in Andoain, besides the immoral, dangerous, or all of this together (Staub, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 3: the Spectrum of Hatred and the Wall of Compassion by Josephine Cripps, Teacher, Summit K-12 School, Seattle 2008
    1 www.wsherc.org Lesson 3: The Spectrum of Hatred and the Wall of Compassion by Josephine Cripps, Teacher, Summit K-12 School, Seattle 2008 Goal: Students will recognize some of the forms of hatred. They will grasp the way hatred, if unchecked, can lead to genocide. And they will explore hatred’s adversary, compassion. Activity: The teacher selects groups of 3-4. She distributes a large sheet of construction paper and a glue stick to each group. She also gives a large envelope to each group. In the envelope are 10 strips of paper. On each strip, one of the following words is typed: 1. Stereotyping 2. Prejudice 3. Discrimination 4. Name-calling 5. Ganging-Up 6. Anti-semitism 7. Bigotry 8. Scapegoating 9. Racism 10. Genocide 2 The teacher offers instructions: Today we are looking closely at some words we have all heard. Your group’s task is to discuss these words and their definitions. Discuss examples you’ve seen, in your own lives, of these words “in action.” Once you have defined the terms, work together to arrange the words vertically, in a spectrum of hatred. For the bottom of the spectrum, choose the word that strikes you as the root, or source, of hatred. Then, arrange the words upward until at the top of the spectrum, you place the word that indicates the most extreme form of hatred. Remember, there is no right or wrong answer as you build your spectrum. Our goal here is for all of us to explore how hatred starts, how it grows, and how it ends.
    [Show full text]