3 World University Bridge Championship Rested for a Day

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3 World University Bridge Championship Rested for a Day 3rd World University Bridge Championship Bulletin No.5 October 25, 2006 Tianjin P.R.China Organizing Committee of 3rd WUBC Tangle on the third day After the Samba time on the second and Norway are in the 3rd and 4th day, the third day turned to tangle. place respectively. The record shows Every teams played normally and clearly that they did not make displayed their true strength. China obvious mistakes and behaved A won all its matches and is on the normally. Here the fifth-placed USA top of the list, with 20.56VPs should be mentioned since it was in averagely. It seems that this team the 9th position on the first day has great potential to bring into play because of Jet-leg. However, it has in the successive matches. Following gone up gradually. Maybe the is Sweden with 18.94VPs averagely. members have adapted to the time It is obvious that the gap between difference and displayed their true the two teams is quite big. Poland B strength. WELCOME MR. DAMIANI! It is such a great honor and privilege to receive Mr. Jose Damiani, the President of the World Bridge Federation, who comes to Tianjin Normal University with profound and amicable sentiments for young people. Mr. Damiani possesses very high good reputation in the world, especially in the field of mental sports education. This time he takes time off from his busy schedule to come to enjoy the 3rd World Bridge Championship, which displays his concern for the university students and their athlete activity. 1 Today’s Vu-Graph Matches Vu-Graph Table 1 (VG1) Vu-Graph Table 2 (VG2) Rd. Time (Open Room ONLY) (Open Room ONLY) 19 09:30-10:35 Italy vs. China A Denmark vs. Poland A 20 10:55-12:00 Poland B vs. Sweden Poland A vs. USA 21 12:20-13:25 Sweden vs. Netherlands Denmark vs. Norway 22 14:40-15:45 Poland B vs. Great Britain Norway vs. USA 23 16:05-17:10 Belgium A vs. China A Poland A vs. Norway 24 17:30-18:35 China A vs. Sweden Germany vs. USA Ranking after Round 18 Change of 1 China A 370 20.56 Schedule 2 Sweden 340 18.94 3 Poland B 334 18.59 Workshop on 4 Norway 331 18.41 5 USA 328 18.29 25th October 6 Poland A 314 17.41 7 Italy 304 16.89 20:15 hrs. To 8 Netherlands 295 16.39 9 Denmark 288 15.88 21:00 hrs 10 Great Britain 281 15.47 10 France B 281 15.47 12 Hong Kong 280 15.41 Dear Team Captains and Players, 13 Czech Republic 275 15.28 14 Germany 276 15.18 Please be informed that the Workshop 15 France A 269 14.94 which has been scheduled to 16 China B 268 14.71 commence at 18:45 hours is now 17 Belgium A 264 14.47 postponed to 20:15 hours after the dinner. The workshop will be held at 18 Canada 256 14.22 the View Graph Room on the 1st Floor 19 Chinese Taipei B 256 14.00 of Yifu Building. It is estimated that 20 Indonesia 253 13.82 the workshop will finish at about 21:00 21 Serbia 243 13.24 hours. Mr. Damiani will appreciate the 22 Japan 240 13.06 presence of you all at this important 23 Turkey 229 12.72 workshop for FISU and WBF. 24 Chinese Taipei A 220 11.88 25 Belgium B 169 9.39 26 Thailand 164 9.11 The Organizing Committee 27 Botswana 133 6.76 2 ‘Thank you China’ Geert Magerman Last year, I came to Tianjin to prepare this championship to do a FISU inspection visit. This visit has as major objectives to look at all the different aspects of the championships such as accommodation, medical services, technical aspects… in the aim to work with the Organizing Committee (OC) to make a good championship. When I met the Organizing Committee (OC) for the first time, not only did they show me their enormous hospitality, but also it became very quick clear that they were very motivated to make it a big success. I agreed with the OC that we should try to have as much participants as possible to enjoy their stay in China! When we are here today, I’m very happy that my impression at that time has become reality, and even more than that! We are living till now a wonderful championships, with a impressive traditional cultural program at the opening ceremony, good accommodation and food, good organization … and last but not least, a very nice competition! As a result, these championships are competed in a good university spirit and a lot of friendship. I can only thank very hardly the Organizing Committee and everybody that is working and supporting this Championship. I’m sure that one day, we will all come back to this country again! The hospitality of the Chinese people is charming us all. Especially all the assistants of each team are helping us every hour and every day to make are stay in China very comfortable. They are all volunteers and I would like to thank them very warmly. I finally thank all students and officials for coming this Championship, and I wish you all a very nice championships. Enjoy your stay in China! Chairman of Technical Committee Bridge FISU President Jin Runcheng Visited Judgments Personally! In the morning of the 23rd, Jin Runcheng, the President of 3rd World University Bridge Championship and the President of Tianjin Normal University, came to the spot and showed his concern for judgments and staffs. Guiding by others, the President visited judgments and asked something about the match. He said that he was glad to learn China A was in the leading position now, and the members should continue their best standard, exchanging with other teams. 3 Match of the day: the Netherlands vs Italy Open Room In round 16, we have The Netherlands N E S W against Italy on viewgraph. For the Dutch, Wortel Presti Michielsen Boldrini I know them quite well since I spent 6 P 1NT P 2NT* years in the country from 1995 to 2001. P 3♦ P 3♥ At the time, these youngsters were little P 4♥ All pass. boys and girls but now they have all grown up. I don’t know the Italian players Closed Room very well but was told that they just N E S W ended up 2nd in the recent world junior Sangiorgio Drijver Ferrari Bruggeman championship in Bangkok, Thailand. P 1NT P 2♣ Presumably this should be an exciting X 2♥ P 4♣* match and as it turned out, there was P 4♥ P 4NT more than expected. Both teams P 5♦ P 6♥ produced some really high standard All pass. bridge for their age. I don’t remember what I were doing at the time, but The Dutch W thought he had enough to certainly would give up my bridge dreams drive to slam despite the fact that partner because of them! How should I know that denied his slam trial the first time. I like I must play the game so well at this age? the Italian auction in the open. They had the method to show 5+♦ with 4♥ and Let’s go back to our match. On board 1, when he discovered that partner doesn’t the Dutch boys bid a sharp slam that have any fit in his main side suit, he made after some helpful information’s stopped in game sensibly. The hand is a from the opponents. lucky make however. Looking at 2 hands, once you can finesse ♦K successfully you Board 1 ♠ Q are almost home. The Italian managed None / N ♥ T86 11 tricks but he was only in 4. The Dutch ♦ KJT9 E, Bob Drijver, had a much more difficult ♣ KT632 task in 6♥. After the X, he got a favorable ♠ KT7 N ♠ AJ4 lead ♣7 to his Q. The contract can be ♥ KQ94 ♥ A752 made now if he guessed the position. E W ♦ AQ872 ♦ 64 Seeing all 4 hands, he had to reject the ♦ ♣ 4 S ♣ AQ95 f inesse. But instead, he should ruff a ♣ in ♠ 986532 dummy and after finding the ♠Q, he could ♥ J3 run all trumps, strip squeezing N in ♦ and ♦ 53 ♣. Then he had to read the ending ♣ J87 position, throw in N or drop ♦K for his 12th trick. However, he took normal ♦ finesse Their biddings: to the K. Had N switched to his singleton ♠Q, he had to play for the strip squeeze 4 for his contract. We would never know if N E S W he would find it or not. But N played back Wortel Presti Michielsen Boldrini a snaky ♦9 to his A and he was in control. Sangiorgio Drijver Ferrar Bruggeman Drijver drew 2 rounds of trumps to 1♠ dummy, and then he ruffed a ♦ in hand. P 1NT All pass. When this was not over ruffed he was released. He could now enter dummy Nowadays, a lot of players abandoned with ♠K and ruffed the last ♦ high. Ruffing the forcing 1NT but playing semi-forcing a ♣ to dummy and drawing the last trump, 1NT response to one major opening. he had 12 tricks for a handsome 980 and However, this hand would give the 11 imps gained. forcing 1NT lovers something to say. Both tables ended up in 1NT after a semi forcing 1NT from E. It started with 3 down and the Dutch in the closed managed 5 tricks for down 2.
Recommended publications
  • Convention Card
    DEFENSIVE AND COMPETITIVE BIDDING LEADS AND SIGNALS WBF Convention Card OVERCALLS (Style, Responses, ½ Level, Reopening) OPENING LEADS AND SIGNALS Style: Normal Lead In Partners’ suit Category: Green Responses: 2NT after 1M is inv+ with 4crd M; new suit F; Suit 3rd and low, standard from Same, KJT->T NBO (Country): the Netherlands cuebid always fit; honors NT Attitude 3rd and low, KJT->T Event: All Reopening: Light Subseq 2/4 through declarer (only if suit not played) Players: Meike Wortel – Marion Michielsen Otherwise 3/5 1NT OVERCALL (2nd /4th Live; Responses, Reopening) Other: K from AK against 5+ level (then count) 2nd position: 15-18 bal. SYSTEM SUMMARY Responses: system on L E A D S 2 over 1 GF Lead vs. Suit vs. NT GENERAL APPROACH AND STYLE: 4th position: 11-14 bal. (11-16 after 1M) Ace A(Kxx) A(Kxx) 1♥/♠ 5+, 1♦ 4+, 1♣ 2+ Responses: system on (11-16: rangecheck stayman 2-lv 11-12; King K(Qx) AK K(Qxx) AKJT(x) Michael Cuebid; Unusual NT; 2N 13-14 (3C asks); 3-lv 15-16 3N: 15-16 both M Queen Q(Jxx) (A)Q(Jxx) KQT9(x) Multi-Landy after NT JUMP OVERCALLS (Style, Responses, Unusual NT) Jack (K)J(Txx) (A/K)J(Txx) 1NT opening: non vul: 14-16 vul: 15-17 Style: Weak suit jumps 10 T(9xx)/HT9 T(9xx)/HT9(x) 9 9x HT9 Responses: Natural High x Xx xxxx Unusual notrump: (1m) 2N: om+♥ (1M) 2N: OM+♦ Low x xxx in 3rd seat: preempts wide-ranged Reopening: Suit: Intermediate; 2NT: 18-19 HCP SIGNALS IN ORDER OF PRIORITY SPECIAL BIDS THAT MAY REQUIRE DEFENCE Partner’s Lead Declarer’s Lead Discarding Transfers on the 1 and 2 level if you overcall our 1m opening DIRECT and JUMP CUE BIDS (Style, Resp., Reopening) Suit:1ST low/high: enc low/high: even low: enc i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 14.Indd
    41st WORLD BRIDGE TEAMS CHAMPIONSHIPS 41st Bermuda Bowl - 19th Venice Cup - 7th dOrsi Trophy - 9th Transnational Open Teams Coordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer Editor: Brent Manley Co-Editors: Mark Horton, Jos Jacobs, Micke DAILY Melander, Brian Senior, Jan van Cleeff Lay out Editor: Ron Tacchi BULLETIN Photographer: Elisabeth van Ettinger Issue No. 14 Sunday, 29th September 2013 Bocchi’s Bermuda Birthday Italy, represented by Norberto Bocchi (what a way to celebrate his birthday) Lorenzo Lauria, Agustin Madala, Alfredo Versace, Giorgio Duboin, Antonio Sementa, Gianni Medugno npc, Giuseppe Failla coach won the Bermuda Bowl for the 15th time, defeating Monaco’s Fulvio Fantoni, Geir Helgemo, Tor Helness, Franck Multon, Claudio Nunes, Pierre Zimmermann, Jean Charles Allavena npc, Krzysztof Martens coach in a one sided fi nal. Poland’s Cesary Balicki, Krzysztof Buras, Krzysztof Jassem, Marcin Mazurkie- wicz, Grzegorz Narkiewicz, Adam Zmudzinski, Piotr Walczak npc, Marek Wojcicki coach took bronze. In a match that kept the worldwide audience on the edge of their seats it was USA2’s Hjordis Eythorsdottir, Jill Levin, Jill Meyers, Janice Seamon-Molson, Jenny Wolpert, Migry Zur-Campanile, Sue Picus npc who won the Venice Cup from England’s Sally Brock, Fiona Brown, Heather Dhondy, Nevena Senior, Nicola Smith, Susan Stockdale, Jeremy Dhondy npc, David Burn coach Th e Netherlands’, Carla Arnolds, Marion Michielsen, Jet Pasman, Anneke Simons, Wietske van Zwol, Meike Wortel, Alex van Reenen npc, Hans Kelder coach fi nished third. Germany ‘s Michael Elinescu, Ulrich Kratz, Reiner Marsal, Bernhard Sträter, Ulrich Wenning, Entscho Wladow, Kareen Schroeder npc, Karin Wenning coach won the d’Orsi Senior Trophy after a thrilling fi nal against USA2’s Roger Bates, Garey Hayden, Marc Jacobus, Carolyn Lynch, Mike Passell, Eddie Wold, Donna Compton npc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alt Invitational V
    ALT V BULLETIN 4 THE ALT Friday, May 29, 2020 editor: Christina Lund Madsen INVITATIONAL V [email protected] logistics: Rosalind Hengeveld big data: Joyce Tito MAY 25 - 29 2020 Previous Winners Face in Final After two close semifinals, two previous winners face each other in the final of the Alt Invitational V. De Botton needed their carry over to beat Street in an e♥austing semifinal last night, and Gupta PRE-BULLETIN wouldTHE have lost toALT Blass had it not been for one boardMonday, May worth 11, 2020 20 IMPs. editor: Christina Lund Madsen During today's final the BBO-commentators are [email protected] to show up in full power to honour Roland INVITATIONALWald, who passed away suddenly. Let us hope theylogistics: Rosalindwill have Hengeveld much to talk about. MAY 11-15, 2020 big data: Joyce Tito We are looking forward to an actionpacked final. online bridge events organized by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online THE ALT INVITATIONAL PRE-BULLETIN Final Important NoticeTHE ALT Monday, May 11, 2020 editor: Christina Lund Madsen Friday [email protected] 29 at 10.00 EDT/16.00 CET All players MAYshould 11-15, enter 2020 BBO 10 INVITATIONAL logistics: Rosalind Hengeveld minutes before their matchMAY starts 11-15, 2020 at big data: Joyce3 Tito x 12 boards online bridge events organized by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online the latest. Tournamentonline bridgedirector events organized Denis by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online Dobrin is waiting for you and will De Botton vs. Gupta instruct you where to sit. THE ALT INVITATIONAL MAY 11-15, 2020 online bridge events organized by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online sign up for the newsletter sign up for the newsletter - 1 - The lightning that by Christina Lund Madsen backfired There are many stories of lightner doubles It is hard to blame East for doubling for a backfiring, and this was one of the more heart lead.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2020 Editor John Liukkonen Email: [email protected]
    KIBITZER ♣♦♥♠ Louisiana Bridge Association January 2020 Editor John Liukkonen email: [email protected] President’s Message January 2020 What is going on at the Bridge Center? Lots of parties and food. So many have joined in to make our holiday season special. Our tacky wear day was fun and should become a yearly occasion. Christmas party and Bridge! Mary LeBlanc your hosting the Christmas party made it a huge success. Our member sponsored Friday Pot Luck Party had the best food and Hunter made a great choice with the Ham and Turkey. Thanks to our Board as they all helped prepare and clean up after the event. Most of us are ready to get back to just playing bridge. I know I am. The Rosenblum Tournament is January 9-12. Don’t forget to vote for the Board of Directors that week (see more election details below.) Susan Beoubay has offered to chair all our tournaments. I don’t know why we are so fortunate to have so many wonderful people willing to volunteer their time and creative abilities. Lowen is ready to help us play better BRIDGE. Class starts Saturday, January 18 at 9:30. See p 4 for more detail on that. I would like to thank everyone for their continued support to make our club the best place to play BRIDGE and make friends. Carolyn Dubois January Events Board of Directors elections *= extra points, no extra fee Starting January 6 —the week of our sectional **=extra points, extra fee tournament—we will hold elections for our Board of Week of Jan 6—vote for Board of Directors Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Night Propels Doub to BAM Victory
    Friday, August 3, 2018 Volume 90, Number 8 Daily Bulletin 90th North American Bridge Championships [email protected] | Editors: Paul Linxwiler and Sue Munday Nickell, Lavazza Big Night Propels exit Spingold Doub to BAM Victory The Spingold round of 16 was harsh to the higher-ranked seeds, with half of them losing their In 2010, after Doug Doub matches. and Yiji Starr won the four- The No. 2 seed led by Nick Nickell was session Goldman Cup Pairs shown the door by the original No. 47 seed, Hyatt at the New York Regional, npc. Hyatt’s roster is Hansa Narasimhan, Carlos they agreed they had to play Pellegrini, Michael Whibley, Sumit Mukherjee and together again. It’s taken eight Debabrata Majumder. Hyatt led Nickell the entire years to make good on that match and won 143-91. commitment and make good, No. 4 Lavazza also got bounced from the event, they did – sneaking by the May losing 131-85 to Stan Tulin and company, the No. 13 Sakr squad to win the Freeman seed. Tulin’s lineup includes Cornelis van Prooijen, Mixed Board-a-Match Teams. Alon Birman, Dror Padon, David Bakhshi and Louk Completing the winning quartet are Rose Yan from continued on page 5 Beijing and Jiang Gu from Mountain Lakes NJ. QF action in the A blazing 19.50 second final sealed the deal for Doub; however a penalty came close Winners of the Freeman Mixed Board-a-Match: Doug Doub, Yiji Starr, Mini-Spingold KOs to pushing the match the Rose Yan and Jiang Gu In today’s semifinal round of the 0-6000 Mini- other way.
    [Show full text]
  • System Notes
    System Notes James Sundstrom Nathan Savir April 9, 2009 Notation Legend M Either Major. If used multiple times, it always refers to the same major. For example, 1M-2| -2M means either the auction 1~ -2| - 2~ or 1♠ -2| -2♠ , no other auction. m Either minor. As per M. OM Other major. This is only used after 'M', such as 1m-1M-2NT-3OM. om Other minor. As per OM. R Raise. Used in some of the step based system to mean a simple raise, such as 1~ -2~ . DR Double Raise. Q Cuebid. Acknowledgements Special thanks are owed to Blair Seidler, without whose teaching I probably would not ever have written these notes. If I did write them, they surely would not be nearly as good as they are. These notes are a (mostly very-distant) relative of his Carnage notes, though a few sections have been borrowed directly from Carnage. 1 Contents I Non-Competitive Auctions4 1 Opening Bid Summary6 2 Minor Suit Auctions7 2.1 Minor-Major................................7 2.1.1 Suit Bypassing Agreements...................7 2.1.2 New Minor Forcing........................7 2.1.3 Reverses..............................8 2.2 Minor Oriented Auctions.........................8 2.3 NT Oriented auctions...........................8 2.4 Passed Hand Bidding...........................8 3 Major Suit Auctions9 3.1 1 over 1 Auctions.............................9 3.2 Major Suit Raise Structure........................9 3.2.1 Direct Raises...........................9 3.2.2 Bergen...............................9 3.2.3 Jacoby 2NT............................9 3.2.4 3NT................................ 10 3.2.5 Splinters.............................. 10 3.3 Passed Hand................................ 10 3.3.1 Drury..............................
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEMPORARY BIDDING SERIES Section 1 - Fridays at 9:00 AM Section 2 – Mondays at 4:00 PM Each Session Is Approximately 90 Minutes in Length
    CONTEMPORARY BIDDING SERIES Section 1 - Fridays at 9:00 AM Section 2 – Mondays at 4:00 PM Each session is approximately 90 minutes in length Understanding Contemporary Bidding (12 weeks) Background Bidding as Language Recognizing Your Philosophy and Your Style Captaincy Considering the Type of Scoring Basic Hand Evaluation and Recognizing Situations Underlying Concepts Offensive and Defensive Hands Bidding with a Passed Partner Bidding in the Real World Vulnerability Considerations Cue Bids and Doubles as Questions Free Bids Searching for Stoppers What Bids Show Stoppers and What Bids Ask? Notrump Openings: Beyond Simple Stayman Determining When (and Why) to Open Notrump When to use Stayman and When to Avoid "Garbage" Stayman Crawling Stayman Puppet Stayman Smolen Gambling 3NT What, When, How Notrump Openings: Beyond Basic Transfers Jacoby Transfer Accepting the transfer Without interference Super-acceptance After interference After you transfer Showing extra trumps Second suit Splinter Texas Transfer: When and Why? Reverses Opener’s Reverse Expected Values and Shape The “High Level” Reverse Responder’s Options Lebensohl Responder’s Reverse Expected Values and Shape Opener’s Options Common Low Level Doubles Takeout Doubles Responding to Partner’s Takeout Double Negative Doubles When and Why? Continuing Sequences More Low Level Doubles Responsive Doubles Support Doubles When to Suppress Support Doubles of Pre-Emptive Bids “Stolen Bid” or “Shadow” Doubles Balancing Why Balance? How to Balance When to Balance (and When Not) Minor Suit Openings
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Bridge Terms
    GLOSSARY OF BRIDGE TERMS Alert When your partner makes a conventional bid you must alert this to the opponents by knocking the table (or displaying the ‘Alert’ card if using bidding boxes). Auction Another term for the bidding. Avoidance An attempt to prevent a particular defender from regaining the lead. Balanced A hand containing no void, no singleton and not more than one Hand doubleton. Barrier When planning your opener's rebid, imagine a ‘barrier’ just above your first suit at the next level up. A new suit rebid below the barrier shows 12-15 points (occasionally 16 or 17 points after a 1 level response when opener doesn’t have enough for a jump shift). A new suit rebid above the barrier that isn’t a jump shift shows 16-19 points (also known as a reverse). Blocked A suit is blocked if there is a high card in the short hand that prevents the suit from being cashed. A player will often aim to unblock the suit. Break The way in which the defenders’ cards in a particular suit are divided between their two hands. For example, a 4-2 break indicates that with 6 cards in a suit missing, one defender has 4 cards of the suit and his partner has 2 cards. Also referred to as split. Cash Playing a card that is certain to win the trick. This card is known as a master. Clear a suit Knocking out the opponents’ last stopper in a suit, after which it will be possible to cash one’s tricks in the suit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Great Day Out
    Editor: Brian Senior • Co-Editor: Ron Klinger Bulletin 7 Layout-Editor: George Georgopoulos Sunday, 14 August 2005 A GREAT DAY OUT The Sydney Opera House as seen from the dinner cruise ship The weather was just perfect for other local landmarks.All in all, one of the yesterday's outing, allowing everyone to best rest days of recent youth champ- have a great time. After leaving the hotel ionships. around lunchtime the first stop was at the Those who did not go on the dinner Koala Park, where there was time to relax cruise would have been impressed with the for a while before enjoying the barbecue organisation and atmosphere surrounding lunch. the rugby union international in the Telstra There was plenty of time after lunch to Stadium, just next to the hotel. Unlike soc- explore the park and, as well as seeing the cer crowds in many parts of the word, the many different species of Australian Australian and New Zealand fans mixed animals, including getting up close enough together happily with no hint of trouble to cuddle koalas, wallabies and even wom- and a good time was had by all — even if bats, there was an exhibition of sheep- the result (a 30-13 win for New Zealand) shearing. Anyone who had never seen an would not have pleased the majority of the expert sheep-shearer at work would have crowd. been amazed at the speed and skill dis- played. VUGRAPH The evening featured a dinner cruise with MATCHES an excellent menu of well-prepared local Poland - Australia 10.00 food.
    [Show full text]
  • About Overcalling
    All About Overcalling It is annoying when the opponents open the bidding in front of you, but that doesn’t mean to say that you are constrained to pass for ever. In fact there are quite of number of reasons why it would be right and proper for you to enter the bidding and these can be classified as follows: 1) Because you have a good hand! 2) Because you want to take up bidding space to make things more difficult for the opponents. 3) Because you want to indicate a lead to partner should the hand on your left end up as declarer. 4) Because you might want to pave the way for a possible sacrifice. Sometimes it is better to concede a penalty than let the opponents end up declaring. 1. You have a good hand Suppose you hold: S AQ765 H K2 D A87 C 75 and hear the hand on your right open 1H. As you would have opened the bidding if you had been declarer it seems only sensible that you should bid now and a bid of 1S seems a stand out. And so it is, but there is one requirement that is absolutely sacrosanct whatever the reason you have for overcalling and that is that you must hold at least a five card suit. We shall see in a moment that the suit must have some quality about it, but that is less important if you have a good hand. 2. You want to be difficult In the early days of bridge it was almost considered to be bad form to bid when you didn’t have much in the way of high cards, but that has all changed.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Encyclopedia-Of-Cardplay-Techniques-Guy-Levé.Pdf
    © 2007 Guy Levé. All rights reserved. It is illegal to reproduce any portion of this mate- rial, except by special arrangement with the publisher. Reproduction of this material without authorization, by any duplication process whatsoever, is a violation of copyright. Master Point Press 331 Douglas Ave. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5M 1H2 (416) 781-0351 Website: http://www.masterpointpress.com http://www.masteringbridge.com http://www.ebooksbridge.com http://www.bridgeblogging.com Email: [email protected] Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Levé, Guy The encyclopedia of card play techniques at bridge / Guy Levé. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-55494-141-4 1. Contract bridge--Encyclopedias. I. Title. GV1282.22.L49 2007 795.41'5303 C2007-901628-6 Editor Ray Lee Interior format and copy editing Suzanne Hocking Cover and interior design Olena S. Sullivan/New Mediatrix Printed in Canada by Webcom Ltd. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 10 09 08 07 Preface Guy Levé, an experienced player from Montpellier in southern France, has a passion for bridge, particularly for the play of the cards. For many years he has been planning to assemble an in-depth study of all known card play techniques and their classification. The only thing he lacked was time for the project; now, having recently retired, he has accom- plished his ambitious task. It has been my privilege to follow its progress and watch the book take shape. A book such as this should not to be put into a beginner’s hands, but it should become a well-thumbed reference source for all players who want to improve their game.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States ______
    No. 16-1275 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________ VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. JOHN WARREN, ET AL., Respondents. __________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit __________ BRIEF OF PREEMPTION LAW PROFESSORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS __________ DEREK T. HO Counsel of Record JULIUS P. TARANTO MICHAEL S. QIN KELLOGG, HANSEN, TODD, FIGEL & FREDERICK, P.L.L.C. 1615 M Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 326-7900 September 4, 2018 ([email protected]) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 2 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 3 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 4 I. A Legislative-Motive Inquiry Here Would Be Unique In Preemption Doc- trine And An Outlier In Constitutional Doctrine Generally ........................................... 4 A. This Court Has Consistently Held That States’ Intent Is Irrelevant to Preemption .................................................. 4 B. Judicial Scrutiny of Legislative Motive Is Disfavored in Constitu- tional Law Generally .................................. 8 II. Preemption Should Not Turn On Subjec- tive Legislative Intent .................................... 10 A. Legislative-Intent Inquiries Raise Serious Conceptual Problems ................... 11 B. Legislative-Intent
    [Show full text]