DOCSLIB.ORG

Topic: Elizabeth I Year Group: 13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Subject: History Topic: Elizabeth I Year Group: 13 1. Character & Aims 2. Government Key Events Dates 1 Childhood 1. Only daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn. 1 The 1. Key to the Elizabethan decision-making process. 1558 Accession of Elizabeth I and 2. Made illegitimate at the age of 3 after Royal 2. Had two main areas: Presence Chamber and the education execution of her mother. Court Privy Chamber. William Cecil appointed secretary 3. Education overseen by her stepmother 3. Royal Court was under the jurisdiction of the 1559 1. Act of Supremacy and Uniformity. Katherine Parr, Kat Ashley, William Grindal and Lord Chamberlain. Roger Ascham. 4. The roles of politician and courtier became 2. Aids the Lords of the Congregation in 4. Had a shrewd grasp of political processors. more intertwined. Scotland 5. Generally a better judge of character than 5. Elizabeth relied on the support and advice of key Mary I had been. figures such as Cecil and Leicester. 1562 Elizabeth becomes seriously ill with 6. Elizabeth’s government became less successful smallpox 2 What were 1. Consolidate her position as queen. from the late 1580s onwards. Elizabeth’s 2. To settle religious issues. 1569 The Northern Rebellion aims as 3. To pursue a peaceful settlement with the What 1. Structure of government helped to prevent 2 1571 Ridolfi Plot queen? French. was the factional rivalry in the early stages of the reign. 4. Elizabeth had no desire to involve herself in impact 2. No single minister had complete control and 1573 Walsingham appointed secretary of government in the same manner as Henry VII of court various families helped to balance power. state but she did take an informed interest in the factions 3. Factional rivalries began to develop in the 1590s decision making process. ? as a result of clashes between Robert Cecil and 1579 Marriage negotiations with Duke of 5. She was prepared to use her royal prerogative the Earl of Essex. Anjou when necessary. 4. Essex lost power and influence that culminated in his ‘rebellion’ of 1601. 1581 Tightening of anti-Catholic laws 3 How did 1. Mary recognized Elizabeth as her successor Elizabeth before her death. 3 What 1. Less important under Elizabeth than it had been 1583 Throckmorton Plot consolidate 2. Mary’s key councilors accepted her accession was the under Henry VIII. her power? to the throne. role of 2. Elizabeth regarded Parliament as a necessary 1584 Bond of Association 3. William Cecil was appointed as her principal Parliam evil. secretary. ent? 3. Parliament served 3 key purposes: law making; 1585 Parry Plot 4. She proceeded quickly with her coronation granting taxation and giving advice. Start of war with Spain (within two months of her accession) 4. Parliament occasionally irritated Elizabeth and 1585 Babington Plot and Mary, QoS guilty of 5. Gained international recognition from foreign challenged her prerogatives. powers. treason 1587 Mary, QoS executed Key People 1588 Death of Earl of Leicester William Cecil Principal secretary from 1558 to 1590s. Promoted to Lord Burghley in 1571. Robert Dudley Close friend, favourite and advisor of Elizabeth. Master of the Horse and made Earl of Leicester in 1564. 1589 Death of Walsingham Sir Francis Walsingham Secretary of state from 1573. Elizabeth’s spymaster. 1591 Robert Cecil promoted to Privy Council Sir Christopher Hatton Lord Chancellor of England and favourite of Elizabeth I. He was involved in the trial of Mary, Queen of Scots. 1596 Robert Cecil appointed secretary of state Robert Devereaux Earl of Essex. Favourite of Elizabeth until his fall from grace after a coup in 1601. 1601 ‘Rebellion’ and execution of Earl of Robert Cecil Son of William and his eventual successor as Elizabeth’s principal advisor. Essex Subject: History Topic: Elizabeth I Year Group: 13 Key People 3. Foreign Policy 4. Society Mary, Queen Queen of Scotland from 1542 to 1 What was 1. England and France sign the peace Treaty of Cateau- 1 Change 1. The Nobility became more peaceable of Scots 1567. Executed in 1587. Elizabeth’s Cambrésis in 1559. This agreed the position of Calais and than in previous reigns. early after it was lost to the French in 1558. Continui 2. The nobles focused on building grand Philip II of Catholic ruler of Spain until 1598. foreign 2. Accession of Francis II of France made Mary, Queen ty houses to demonstrate their prestige. Spain Sent the Armada in 1588. policy like? of Scots, Queen of France. 3. Elizabeth created no more dukes after Scottish Protestant preacher who 3. Scotland becomes a client state of France. John Knox the execution of Norfolk in 1572. spoke against female rulers. 4. England provides support to the Protestant Lords of 4. Gentry class increased in size and the Congregation. influence. James Earl of Moray. Half-brother of 5. Elizabeth and Dudley support the cause of the 5. Gap between rich and poor widened. Stewart Mary QoS & regent for James VI. Huguenots in France. 6. Population was roughly 4 million, with most people living in the countryside. John Hawkins English privateer, slave trader and 2 What was 1. Queen of Scotland from 1542 to 1586. Queen of merchant who stole gold from the France from 1560-1562. 2 Poverty 1. Introduced several further measures to Spanish ships. influence 2. Elizabeth provided support to the Protestants in and relieve poverty. James VI King of Scotland from 1567. of Mary, Scotland. Poor 2. Poor Law Act of 1576 created a national Queen of 3. Mary wished to be recognized as Elizabeth’s heir. Relief system of poor relief. Francis Drake Leader of the English Navy against Scots? 4. Mary forced to abdicate in 1567, she fled into 3. Each parish was responsible for the the Spanish Armada. England the following year and was kept under impotent poor. house arrest. 4. Elizabeth’s government took care of the Earl of Tyrone Irish clan chief who rose up against 5. Mary was the focus of numerous plots and Elizabeth deserving poor. Elizabeth in 1595. was finally forced to authorize her execution in 1587. 5. Treatment of the undeserving poor remained harsh. Key Dates 3 Marriage 1. Elizabeth became known as the Virgin Queen 2. Her single status caused issues as there was no clear 3 The 1. Catholic Ireland differed greatly from 1559 Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis heir to her throne should she die. Regions Protestant England. Treaty of Edinburgh 3. There were numerous suitors for Elizabeth 2. Numerous rebellions broke out in 1560 throughout her reign: Philip II of Spain, Robert Ireland, some linked to the Spanish war. 1564 Treaty of Troyes Dudley, Archdukes Ferdinand and Charles, Prince 3. Essex sent to Ireland to deal with rebels; Erik of Sweden and the Duke of Anjou. failed in his objectives. 1567 Mary, QoS forced to abdicate 4. Elizabeth declared her marriage a matter of royal 4. Welsh border no longer a problem. prerogative and prevented Parliament from 5. North of England remained problematic. 1569 Northern Rebellion discussing it. 6. Elizabeth continued to appoint southerners as wardens of the North. 1576 Poor Law Act introduced 4 Why did 1. Relations with Spain worsened throughout the reign. relations 2. Trading activity of John Hawkins and other privateers 4 The 1. Took place in Durham and North 1579 Marriage negotiations with Duke of Anjou with Spain caused tensions. Norther Yorkshire in 1569. 1586 Treaty of Berwick worsen? 3. Elizabeth’s involvement in the Spanish Netherlands n 2. Numerous motivations: worsened relations. Rebellio 3. Catholic discontent 1587 Mary, QoS executed 4. Philip II sent an armada in 1588 which was defeated n 4. Loss of political influence by Lord Howard and Francis Drake. 5. Restore Mary, Queen of Scots to the 1588 Defeat of the Spanish Armada 5. War with Spain continued over disputes with the Sea Scottish throne. 1594 Start of Tyrone Rebellion in Ireland Beggars and the Netherlands until after Elizabeth’s 6. Defeated by Elizabeth’s forces and the death. rebels were treated harshly. 1598 Defeat of English in Ireland at Yellow Ford. Subject: History Topic: Elizabeth I Year Group: 13 Key Words Definition 5. Economy: 6. Religion and ideas Factionalism Disputes between two or more small 1 What was 1. Internal trade was more successful 1 What was the 1. Act of Supremacy 1559 restored royal groups from within a larger group. trade like? than foreign trade. Religious supremacy. System where Crown distributes Settlement of 2. Act described Elizabeth as ‘supreme Patronage 2. Wider range of luxury goods favours to those seen as loyal. imported. 1559? governor’ of the Church of England instead Rights the monarch can exercise 3. Cloth trade declines in importance. of ‘head’. Prerogative 4. New trading routes and companies 3. Act of Uniformity specified the use of a without consent of Parliament. established. single Book of Common Prayer. Presence Place where private contact between 4. Royal injunctions 1559 were a set of Chamber Queen and courtiers takes place. 2 Exploration 1. Extension of trade to North America. instructions about the conduct of church and 2. Attempts to set up a colony in services. Privy Private rooms where monarch would colonisation Virginia. Chamber meet with their councillors 3. Expeditions to Roanoke Island and 2 What was the 1. The religious settlement was Protestant and North Carolina – but the settlements impact of early accepted by most. Huguenots French Protestants religious 2. Matthew Parker made Archbishop of were unsuccessful. Regicide Killing of a monarch 4. Walter Raleigh, Humphrey Gilbert and developments? Canterbury. 3. Most of the new bishops were returning Richard Hakluyt were key figures in Poor Relief Assistance given to the poor from Protestant exiles.
Recommended publications
  • 'All Wemen in Thar Degree Shuld to Thar Men Subiectit Be': the Controversial Court Career of Elisabeth Parr, Marchioness Of

    'All Wemen in Thar Degree Shuld to Thar Men Subiectit Be': the Controversial Court Career of Elisabeth Parr, Marchioness Of

    ‘All wemen in thar degree shuld to thar men subiectit be’: The controversial court career of Elisabeth Parr, marchioness of Northampton, c. 1547-1565 Helen Joanne Graham-Matheson, BA, MA. Thesis submitted to UCL for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Declaration I, Helen Joanne Graham-Matheson confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis reconstructs and analyses the life and agency of Elisabeth Parr, marchioness of Northampton (1526-1565), with the aim of increasing understanding of women’s networks of influence and political engagement at the mid-Tudor courts, c. 1547- 1565. Analysis of Elisabeth’s life highlights that in the absence of a Queen consort the noblewomen of the Edwardian court maintained and utilized access to those in power and those with political significance and authority. During the reign of Mary Tudor, Elisabeth worked with her natal family to undermine Mary’s Queenship and support Elizabeth Tudor, particularly by providing her with foreign intelligence. At the Elizabethan court Elisabeth regained her title (lost under Mary I) and occupied a position as one of the Queen’s most trusted confidantes and influential associates. Her agency merited attention from ambassadors and noblemen as well as from the Emperor Maximilian and King Erik of Sweden, due to the significant role she played in several major contemporary events, such as Elizabeth’s early marriage negotiations. This research is interdisciplinary, incorporating early modern social, political and cultural historiographies, gender studies, social anthropology, sociology and the study of early modern literature.
  • Teachers' Notes

    Teachers' Notes

    1 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS JUST A QUEEN Jane Caro Teachers’ Notes Written by a practising teacher librarian in context with the Australian curriculum (English) ISBN: 978 0 7022 5362 1 / AUS $19.95 Synopsis 2 Themes 2 Relationships 2 Leadership 2 Tudor England 2 Religion 3 Writing Style 3 Study Notes 3 Author Motivation 7 About the Author 8 These notes may be reproduced free of charge for use and study within schools but they may not be reproduced (either in whole or in part) and offered for commercial sale. PO Box 6042 St Lucia QLD 4067 Ph: (+61 7) 3365 7244 [email protected] University of Queensland Press Australia Fax: (+61 7) 3365 7579 www.uqp.com.au ABN 63 942 912 684 2 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS SYNOPSIS Just a Queen follows on from Jane Caro’s Just a Girl, a historical novel about the life and reign of Queen Elizabeth I. Elizabeth has outsmarted her enemies and risen above a lifetime of hurt and betrayal – a mother executed by her father, a beloved brother who died too young and an enemy sister whose death made her queen. Not knowing whom she can trust, Elizabeth is surrounded by men who give her compliments and advice but may be hiding daggers and poison behind their backs. Elizabeth must use her head and ignore her heart to be the queen her people need, even if it means doing the one thing she swore she would never do: executing a fellow queen, her cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots.
  • Devin-Thinking Sideways Is Not Supported by a Desert Native in Hip Waders

    Devin-Thinking Sideways Is Not Supported by a Desert Native in Hip Waders

    Devin-Thinking Sideways is not supported by a desert native in hip waders. Instead it's supported by the generous donations of our listeners on Patreon. Visit patreon dot com slash thinking sideways to learn more. And thanks. [Intro] Joe-Hi there. Welcome to another episode of Thinking Sideways. I'm Joe, joined as always by... Steve-Steve. J-This week, we're going to be talking about the disappearance of Devin. What happened to Devin from Thinking Sideways? She was supposed to be at the recording studio at 7 pm. It's 7:05, and she's not here. All right, theories. She ran away to start a new life. (Knocking in background.) Uh, can you get that? S-Yeah. D-Sorry guys. Sorry I'm late. J-Oh... D-I was Tweeting. J-Oh. D-Sorry, ok, sorry. Ok, ok. J-(sighs) Well, time to find a new mystery. Hang on a second while I go through the Google. Uh, please enjoy this really restful elevator music. (Music plays). Hi there, welcome to another episode of Thinking Sideways. I'm Joe, joined as always by... D-Devin. J-And... S-Steve. J-Yeah. This week we're going to talk about a few mysteries surrounding Queen Elizabeth the First of England. Some of you guys may have heard of her. S-Once or twice. J-Yeah. D-I guess. J-And these are a couple of different mysteries that have been suggested to us by so many people that I'm not going to give you guys a shout out except to say thanks for the suggestions.
  • Elizabeth I, Queen of England (1533—1603)

    Elizabeth I, Queen of England (1533—1603)

    ELIZABETH I, QUEEN OF ENGLAND (1533—1603) Jane Beal ELIZABETH I, QUEEN of England is well remem- took refuge from the world and its troubles in the bered as one of the greatest monarchs ever to disciplines of learning. She was well versed in rule the British Empire. However, she was not the liberal arts, modern European languages, much recognized for her powerful writing and Latin, and Greek, Protestant theology, and works her influence as a patron of the arts in Renais- on the art of governing well. Spiritually, Elizabeth sance England. Publication of editions of her col- was a devout Christian. She was raised as a lected works and translations now make it pos- Protestant, but for a brief period during the reign sible to evaluate her literary legacy in the context of her sister Mary, she put on an outward show of her historical roles: extraordinary woman, of Catholicism to preserve her life and keep the great monarch, powerful writer, accomplished peace with her sister, the queen. When Elizabeth translator, and influential patron. As a writer, herself became queen, and the governor of the Elizabeth I authored many fine poems, prayers, Church of England, she wanted conformity from letters, and speeches. As a multilingual translator, her people: Catholics were not to be persecuted; she enjoyed working with Christian texts about radical Protestants were not to be encouraged. faith and classical texts on governance. This position was political for the sake of peace. Spiritually, Elizabeth’s Christian faith was both dynamic and profound, as her writings attest, and AN EXTRAORDINARY WOMAN it seems that her desire was for her people to By the time she ascended the throne of England experience Christianity meaningfully in their at the age of twenty-five, Elizabeth had been souls and social practices, as she did.
  • Image and Influence: the Political Uses of Music at the Court of Elizabeth I

    Image and Influence: the Political Uses of Music at the Court of Elizabeth I

    Image and Influence: The Political Uses of Music at the Court of Elizabeth I Katherine Anne Butler Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Acknowledgements With thanks to all the people who supported me throughout my research, especially: My supervisor, Stephen Rose, My advisors, Elizabeth Eva Leach and Anna Whitelock, The Arts and Humanities Research Council for funding this research, Royal Holloway Music Department for conference grants, My proofreaders, Holly Winterton, Sarah Beal, Janet McKnight and my Mum, My parents and my fiancé, Chris Wedge, for moral support and encouragement. Declaration of Authorship I, Katherine Butler, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract In their Cantiones sacrae (1575), court musicians William Byrd and Thomas Tallis declared that ‘music is indispensable to the state’ (necessarium reipub.). Yet although the relationship between Elizabethan politics and literature has been studied often, there has been little research into the political functions of music. Most accounts of court music consist of documentary research into the personnel, institutions and performance occasions, and generally assume that music’s functions were limited to entertainment and displays of magnificence. However, Elizabethans believed that musical concord promoted a social harmony that would ease the process of government; hence politics and music were seen as closely connected. This thesis is an interdisciplinary investigation into the role of music in constructing royal and courtly identities and influencing Elizabeth’s policies and patronage.
  • Political Elites and Community Relations in Elizabethan Devon, 1588-1603

    Political Elites and Community Relations in Elizabethan Devon, 1588-1603

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Plymouth Electronic Archive and Research Library Networks, News and Communication: Political Elites and Community Relations in Elizabethan Devon, 1588-1603 by Ian David Cooper A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities and Performing Arts Faculty of Arts In collaboration with Devon Record Office September 2012 In loving memory of my grandfathers, Eric George Wright and Ronald Henry George Cooper, and my godfather, David Michael Jefferies ii Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. iii Abstract Ian David Cooper ‘Networks, News and Communication: Political Elites and Community Relations in Elizabethan Devon, 1588-1603’ Focusing on the ‘second reign’ of Queen Elizabeth I (1588-1603), this thesis constitutes the first significant socio-political examination of Elizabethan Devon – a geographically peripheral county, yet strategically central in matters pertaining to national defence and security. A complex web of personal associations and informal alliances underpinned politics and governance in Tudor England; but whereas a great deal is now understood about relations between both the political elite and the organs of government at the centre of affairs, many questions still remain unanswered about how networks of political actors functioned at a provincial and neighbourhood level, and how these networks kept in touch with one another, central government and the court.
  • University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan

    University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan

    7 0 -m -,1 1 9 WILLIS, Craig Dean, 1935- THE TUDORS AND THEIR TUTORS: A STUDY OF SIXTEENTH CENTURY ROYAL EDUCATION IN BRITAIN. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1969 Education, history University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © Copyright by Craig Dean W illis 1970 THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE TUDORS AND THEIR- TUTORS: A STUDY OF SIXTEENTH CENTURY ROYAL EDUCATION IN BRITAIN DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University SY Craig Dean W illis, B.A., M.A. IHt- -tttt -H-H- The Ohio State U niversity 1969 Adviser t School of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To Dr. Robert B. Sutton, my major adviser, I owe a major debt of gratitude for his guidance, encouragement, and scholarly qualifies* I also wish to thank the members of the reading committee for their contribution; and in particular, I want to express appreciation to Dr. Richard J. Frankie and the late Dr. Earl Anderson for their professional and meaningful assistance. It is appropriate to thank the administrative officers at Ohio Wesleyan University for their encouragement and willingness to let me arrange my work around my graduate studies. Persons of particular help were Dr, Allan C. Ingraham, Dr. Elden T. Smith, Dr. Emerson C. Shuck, and Dr. Robert P. Lisensky. My family has been of invaluable assistance to me, and it is to them that I dedicate the study of the education of the Tudor family. My parents, J. Russell and Glenna A. W illis, have helped in many ways, both overt and subtle.
  • Scotland and the Early Modern Naval Revolution, 1488-1603

    Scotland and the Early Modern Naval Revolution, 1488-1603

    Scotland and the Early Modern Naval Revolution, 1488-1603 by Sean K. Grant A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Sean K. Grant, October 2014 ABSTRACT SCOTLAND AND THE EARLY MODERN NAVAL REVOLUTION, 1488-1603 Sean Kevin Grant Advisor: University of Guelph, 2014 Professor E. Ewan By re-examining the circumstances surrounding the establishment and disestablishment of the Scots Navy, this thesis challenges existing scholarship which suggests that Scotland was neither an active participant in, or greatly impacted by, the early modern naval revolution. The Scots Navy did not disappear in the middle of the sixteenth century because Scotland no longer had need for a means of conducting maritime warfare, nor was a lack of fiscal capacity on the part of the Scottish state to blame, as has been suggested. In fact, the kingdom faced a constant series of maritime threats throughout the period, and these had compelled the Scots to accept the value of seapower and to embrace the technological innovations of the naval revolution. And as had occurred in other states impacted by the revolution, the Scottish fiscal system went through a structural transition that gave the Crown the capacity to acquire and maintain a permanent fleet. However, by mid-century the need for such a fleet had dissipated due to a shift in strategic focus which merged Crown and mercantile interests. This merger solved the principal-agent problem of military contracting – the dilemma that had led James IV to found the Navy in the first place – and this meant that Scottish maritime warfare could be conducted by privateers alone thereafter.
  • Elizabeth I) Was the Daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn (Depicted in This Image)

    Elizabeth I) Was the Daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn (Depicted in This Image)

    PRINCESS ELIZABETH 0. PRINCESS ELIZABETH - Story Preface 1. PRINCESS ELIZABETH 2. PHILIP II: KING CONSORT of BRITAIN 3. ELIZABETH BECOMES QUEEN 4. THE TROUBLE WITH MARY 5. THE BABINGTON PLOT 6. A QUEEN LOSES HER HEAD 7. SIR WALTER RALEIGH 8. PHILIP II and the ARMADA 9. THE ARMADA SAILS 10. NEGOTIATIONS FAIL 11. BRITISH SHIPS 12. THE FLEETS ENGAGE 13. FIRE SHIPS and the BATTLE OF GRAVELINES 14. PARMA'S NO-SHOW 15. PUSHED TO THE NORTH SEA 16. ELIZABETH'S SPEECH to her PEOPLE 17. SAILING HOME by a NORTHERN ROUTE 18. SPANISH SHIPS on IRISH ROCKS 19. MISERY IN IRELAND 20. CELEBRATING THE VICTORY 21. THE DEATH OF RALEIGH 22. THE GOLDEN AGE Princess Elizabeth Tudor (later Queen Elizabeth I) was the daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn (depicted in this image). The King's portrait, created by Hans Holbein the Younger, shows how Henry appeared circa 1536 (when Elizabeth was about three years old). The portrait of Anne Boleyn is by an unknown artist. Online via Wikimedia Commons. Even though Henry VIII desperately wanted a son, his new child - with his new queen, Anne Boleyn - was a daughter. Elizabeth was born at London's Greenwich Palace on the 7th of September, 1533. She had her father's coloring: golden-red hair and very fair skin. Before the little girl was three years old, her mother was beheaded on the Tower Green. Accused of various crimes, Anne's worst offense may have been the birth of a stillborn son. Princess Elizabeth was strong-willed, even as a child.
  • The Moral Development of Elizabeth Tudor: from Troubled Youth to Triumphant Monarch

    The Moral Development of Elizabeth Tudor: from Troubled Youth to Triumphant Monarch

    Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet M.A. in Philosophy of History Theses History 8-2012 The orM al Development of Elizabeth Tudor: From Troubled Youth to Triumphant Monarch Amanda Upshaw Olivet Nazarene University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/hist_maph Part of the Developmental Psychology Commons, and the European History Commons Recommended Citation Upshaw, Amanda, "The orM al Development of Elizabeth Tudor: From Troubled Youth to Triumphant Monarch" (2012). M.A. in Philosophy of History Theses. 2. https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/hist_maph/2 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Digital Commons @ Olivet. It has been accepted for inclusion in M.A. in Philosophy of History Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Olivet. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Upshaw 1 The Moral Development of Elizabeth Tudor: From Troubled Youth to Triumphant Monarch A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History and Political Science School of Graduate and Continuing Studies Olivet Nazarene University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Philosophy of History by Amanda Upshaw August 2012 Upshaw 2 © 2012 Amanda Upshaw ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Upshaw 3 The Moral Development of Elizabeth Tudor: From Troubled Youth to Triumphant Monarch History remembers Elizabeth Tudor as one of England’s most powerful and influential monarchs. She is known for bringing England into one of its most prosperous and culturally rich periods. Elizabeth is famous for being a unique ruler in many ways.
  • Aristocratic Women at the Late Elizabethan Court: Politics, Patronage and Power

    Aristocratic Women at the Late Elizabethan Court: Politics, Patronage and Power

    Aristocratic Women at the Late Elizabethan Court: Politics, Patronage and Power Joanne Lee Hocking School of Humanities, Department of History University of Adelaide November 2015 Table of Contents Abstract i Thesis declaration iii Acknowledgments iv List of Abbreviations v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 The Political Context, 1580-1603 28 Chapter 3 The Politics of Female Agency: 54 Anne Dudley, Countess of Warwick Chapter 4 The Politics of Family and Faction: 132 Anne, Lady Bacon and Elizabeth, Lady Russell Chapter 5 The Politics of Favour: the Essex Women 195 Chapter 6 Conclusion 265 Appendices Appendix A – the Russell family 273 Appendix B – the Dudley family 274 Appendix C – the Cooke family 275 Appendix D – the Devereux family 276 Appendix E – Countess of Warwick’s 277 Patronage Network Appendix F –Countess of Warwick’s will 292 Bibliography 305 Abstract This thesis examines the power of aristocratic women in politics and patronage in the final years of the Elizabethan court (1580 to 1603). Substantial archival sources are analysed to evaluate the concepts of female political agency discussed in scholarly literature, including women’s roles in politics, within families, in networks and as part of the court patronage system. A case study methodology is used to examine the lives and careers of specific aristocratic women in three spheres of court politics – the politics of female agency, the politics of family and faction, and the politics of favour. The first case study looks at Elizabeth’s long-serving lady-in-waiting, Anne Dudley, Countess of Warwick, and demonstrates that female political agents harnessed multiple sources of agency to exercise power at court on behalf of dense patronage networks.
  • Notes on the Vicit Leo Testoons of Mary Queen of Scots

    Notes on the Vicit Leo Testoons of Mary Queen of Scots

    NOTES ON THE VICIT LEO TESTOONS OF MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS JOAN E. L. MURRAY AND J. K. R. MURRAY TESTOONS and half-testoons with the reverse legend Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda were struck in 1560 and 1561. A major division within the 1560 pieces is provided by the form of contraction for -que at the end of the obverse inscription, which is an abbreviated version of Franciscus et Maria Dei Gratia Rex et Regina Francorum Scotorumque. Initially, this contraction took the form which in this context is usually described as B, but which in manuscripts can be seen to be based on the small letter q; later in 1560, and on all the 1561 pieces of this type, a capital Q was used (with a stroke through the tail, as contraction mark). At the same time there was a change in the form of crown over the shield on the obverse. One of us (J. K. R. M.) has already published an article on this coinage and drawn attention to other changes in the puncheons used for some major features, which do not exactly coincide with the change from SCOTOR B to SCOTOR Q.1 The other (J. E. L. M.), in a paper read to the Society in 1976, has argued against dating the introduction of this type to before the death of Mary of Guise, the regent: the treatment of this question below makes some new points as well as recording the previous arguments. In the other parts of this article, two anomalous varieties are discussed, and their approximate positions in the sequence of varieties is determined.