Pilot Training

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pilot Training VERY LIGHT JET: PILOT TRAINING TO ENHANCE SAFE AND EFFICIENT OPERATION By TWEET T. COLEMAN Bachelor of Science Mills College Oakland. California 1976 Master of Aeronautical Science Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida 1995 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION July, 2008 VERY LIGHT JET: PILOT TRAINING TO ENHANCE SAFE AND EFFICIENT OPERATION Dissertation Approved: Steven K. Marks Thesis Adviser Mary Kutz Timm Bliss James P. Key A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS “In this chaotic world, we need leaders… We need leaders to help us develop the clear identity that lights the dark moments of confusion” (Wheatley, 1999). I wish to thank my committee members, who lead and guided me to complete the academic requirements: Dr. Mary Kutz, Dr. James Key, Dr. Timm Bliss, and especially my committee chair, Dr. Steve Marks. A big “Mahalo” to my course coaches: Alethia Futtrell and John Direnzo, also graduates of this program. We worked as a team throughout this educational journey, sharing our understanding of the leadership styles of 20th and 21st century, class presentations, and the statistical research and design challenges. We supported each other, certainly a comforting feeling when working through this doctoral program. I want to express my deep appreciation to my husband, Patrick, who has been there through the light and dark moments for the last 39 years. Clearly, he is the horizontal stabilizer in my life and especially with this research project. I would like to thank my four children: Al, Jeannie, Jason, and Jenny who provided chaos, creativity, and deep insights. Finally, I would like to thank my fellow pilots who read, critiqued, and contributed to this research project. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1 Background...............................................................................................1 Statement of the Problem..........................................................................5 Purpose of the Study .................................................................................7 Research Questions...................................................................................7 Assumptions..............................................................................................7 Hypotheses................................................................................................7 Scope and Limitations...............................................................................8 Definitions.................................................................................................9 II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE .................................................................14 Pilot Training..........................................................................................15 Government Documents .........................................................................17 FAA Industry Training Standards (FITS)...............................................20 National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) .................................22 Pilot Qualifications ................................................................................23 Mentor Program......................................................................................25 Mentor Responsibilities.................................................................27 Selection Criteria...........................................................................28 Education/Ratings/Desired Qualities.............................................28 Manufacturers.........................................................................................29 Recurrent Pilot Training.........................................................................31 Airport Specifications.............................................................................32 III. METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................................34 Introduction.............................................................................................34 Design of the Study.................................................................................35 Population...............................................................................................36 Sample.....................................................................................................36 Instrument ...............................................................................................37 Instrument Selection......................................................................37 Instrument Description...................................................................38 Instrument Reliability and Validity...............................................38 iv Chapter Page Procedures for Gathering Data.......................................................39 Data Analysis Techniques & Mathematical Procedures................41 Limitations ..............................................................................................44 Summary.................................................................................................44 IV. FINDINGS.......................................................................................................45 Introduction.............................................................................................45 Demographic Data and Return Percentages ...........................................46 Data Summarization................................................................................47 Survey Question Number One.......................................................47 Survey Question Number Two......................................................48 Survey Question Number Three....................................................49 Survey Question Number Four......................................................50 Survey Question Number Five.......................................................51 Survey Question Number Six........................................................52 Survey Question Number Seven....................................................53 Survey Question Number Eight.....................................................54 Survey Question Number Nine......................................................55 Survey Question Number Ten.......................................................56 Survey Question Number Eleven...................................................59 Survey Question Number Twelve..................................................61 Survey Question Number Thirteen................................................62 Survey Question Number Fourteen...............................................63 Survey Question Number Fifteen .................................................64 Survey Question Number Sixteen..................................................65 Survey Question Number Seventeen.............................................66 Survey Question Number Eighteen...............................................67 Survey Question Number Nineteen...............................................68 Survey Question Number Twenty.................................................69 Survey Question N umber Twenty One.........................................71 Research Question Number One....................................................72 Research Question Number Two...................................................73 Research Question Number Three.................................................73 Research Question Number Four...................................................73 Research Question Number Five...................................................74 Research Question Number Six.....................................................74 V. SUMMRY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................78 Introduction.............................................................................................78 The Study Sought to Answer Six Research Questions ..................79 Summary.................................................................................................79 Problem...................................................................................................80 v Chapter Page Conclusion..............................................................................................81 Survey Question Fourteen..............................................................81 Survey Question Fifteen ...............................................................82 Survey Question Sixteen ...............................................................82 Research Question Number One....................................................83 Research Question Number Two...................................................84 Research Question Number Three.................................................84 Research Question Number Four...................................................85 Research Question Number Five...................................................85 Research Question Number Six ....................................................85 Respondents Special Interest Areas........................................................86 Safety Features in the VLJ ............................................................86
Recommended publications
  • SULLY's SPLASHDOWN: a Story of Redemption for Pilots the Recession
    AKERS...EUROPE’S ETS PROVES TO BE A FIASCO FOR OPERATORS...NEWSMAKERS...PLATINUM JET EXECS, EMPLOYEES INDICTED...NEWSMAKERS...START-UP FRAX JET REPUBLIC F O L D S . N E W S M A K E R S . F A A A C T S Q U I C K L Y I N NEWSmak2009ers INSIDE: I Sully’s splashdown pg 22 I The recession takes its toll pg 22 I Santulli ejects from NetJets pg 23 I Negative portrayal of bizjets pg 23 I Northwest pilots overfly MSP pg 23 I Europe’s ETS proves a fiasco pg 24 S R E T JetDirect collapse pg 24 U I E R / D I SULLY’S SPLASHDOWN: TSA revises LASP proposal pg 24 M I R E D C M Colgan crash ignites questions pg 26 N I A D A story of redemption for pilots N E R Eclipse Aerospace pg 26 B I NEWSMAKER OF THE YEAR I Hudson River midair pg 28 K C I Platinum Jet workers indicted pg 28 N I P hen Capt. Chesley “Sully” going to be in the Hudson.” E O K Sullenberger brought the aft Only a fellow pilot, aware of the slim odds Jet Republic collapses pg 30 M I I belly skin of his US Airways for putting an airliner down in water without J Capt. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger (left) and FAA approves Waas upgrades pg 30 WAirbus A320 into contact breaking apart in the process, can fully appre- First Officer Jeffrey Skiles brought some glory I with the cold water of New York’s Hudson ciate the enormity of what confronted Sully to the airline pilot profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Eclipse and Kestrel Are One!
    INTERNATIONAL FLYING THE DIY TRAVEL PREP MAGENTA LINE Border crossings made easier Will you fall victim? EJOPA EDITION PAGE 14 THE PRIVATE JET MAGAZINE • SUMMER 2015 ECLIPSE AND KESTREL ARE ONE! AUTOMATED FORECASTS Why computer WX prediction is worrisome READY FOR A FLYING CAR? Lots of manufacturers race from freeways to airways PAGE 54 FAA Type Ratings & Recurrent Flight Training Sales • Training • Delivery Your Turbine Transition Specialists jetAVIVA is an authority on owner/operator flown turbine aircraft, oering acquisition and sales services backed with the experience of completing hundreds of transactions. Furthermore, we provide acceptance, delivery, and training services in all production light turbine aircraft. jetAVIVA is focused Featured in AOPA PILOT Magazine on providing Clients with comprehensive services to choose the right aircraft and operate it with maximum eciency and safety. Customized Flight Training Programs on Your Time at Your Location FAA Type Rating Practical Tests & Recurrent Training Per FAR 61.58 CE-500 • CE-510 • CE-525 • CE-560 XL • CE-650 • LR-JET • RA-390 • DA-50 John Azma is an FAA Designated Pilot Examiner qualified to provide Recurrent Training & Type Rating Practical Tests that may be added to your private, commercial and airline transport pilot certificate. Azma FLT Inc. is based in Orlando Florida at KORL. Our experienced & professional flight instructors are also available to provide training at your location. Highly regarded in the industry, and approved by insurance companies, Azma Contact Us To Learn More: FLT Inc. has been featured in aviation specific publications and editorials. Our 844-296-2358 commitment to excellence and superior services begins when you first contact Learn what jetAVIVA can do for you at www.jetAVIVA.com [email protected] us and continues beyond the completion of your training.
    [Show full text]
  • HORSES, KENTUCKY DERBY (1875-2019) Kentucky Derby
    HORSES, KENTUCKY DERBY (1875-2019) Kentucky Derby Winners, Alphabetically (1875-2019) HORSE YEAR HORSE YEAR Affirmed 1978 Kauai King 1966 Agile 1905 Kingman 1891 Alan-a-Dale 1902 Lawrin 1938 Always Dreaming 2017 Leonatus 1883 Alysheba 1987 Lieut. Gibson 1900 American Pharoah 2015 Lil E. Tee 1992 Animal Kingdom 2011 Lookout 1893 Apollo (g) 1882 Lord Murphy 1879 Aristides 1875 Lucky Debonair 1965 Assault 1946 Macbeth II (g) 1888 Azra 1892 Majestic Prince 1969 Baden-Baden 1877 Manuel 1899 Barbaro 2006 Meridian 1911 Behave Yourself 1921 Middleground 1950 Ben Ali 1886 Mine That Bird 2009 Ben Brush 1896 Monarchos 2001 Big Brown 2008 Montrose 1887 Black Gold 1924 Morvich 1922 Bold Forbes 1976 Needles 1956 Bold Venture 1936 Northern Dancer-CAN 1964 Brokers Tip 1933 Nyquist 2016 Bubbling Over 1926 Old Rosebud (g) 1914 Buchanan 1884 Omaha 1935 Burgoo King 1932 Omar Khayyam-GB 1917 California Chrome 2014 Orb 2013 Cannonade 1974 Paul Jones (g) 1920 Canonero II 1971 Pensive 1944 Carry Back 1961 Pink Star 1907 Cavalcade 1934 Plaudit 1898 Chant 1894 Pleasant Colony 1981 Charismatic 1999 Ponder 1949 Chateaugay 1963 Proud Clarion 1967 Citation 1948 Real Quiet 1998 Clyde Van Dusen (g) 1929 Regret (f) 1915 Count Fleet 1943 Reigh Count 1928 Count Turf 1951 Riley 1890 Country House 2019 Riva Ridge 1972 Dark Star 1953 Sea Hero 1993 Day Star 1878 Seattle Slew 1977 Decidedly 1962 Secretariat 1973 Determine 1954 Shut Out 1942 Donau 1910 Silver Charm 1997 Donerail 1913 Sir Barton 1919 Dust Commander 1970 Sir Huon 1906 Elwood 1904 Smarty Jones 2004 Exterminator
    [Show full text]
  • But Yanks' Rivals Perk Up
    Griffs Copying '57 Pattern " m litlfc J&M; * But Yanks' Rivals Perk Up Ktttatap/ -¦* u 00: v Athletics Put Some Life Problems Grow Braves Hurt As Club Drops In AL Race With Sweep 16 of 20 Again By It th» AtMCltMd Pr*M Rocky Colavtto and Minnie Lack of By The rest of the American Minoso belted two-run homers Rt'RTON HAWKINS League beginning ¦Ur Rttl» Writer is to show for the Indians, with signs of life. Nobody is chal- Minoso NEW YORK. May 29-It for Buhl lenging those Yankees yet, but driving in three runs. Jack happened a little,later this Sub White Harslunan (&-3> year, It looks as if the Sox lost his third that'a all! By th« AuaclAttd Prm and Tlfcers are through play- In a row. 'Cal McLish put Laat season the Senators .started by losing games, The Braves may have the best ing patsy, while Kansas City complete-game victories back- 16 of 20 pitching In the National League, and Cleveland appear serious a drab drama which ended with about escaping the second divi- to-back for the first time in his the dismissal of Chuck Dressen to find - but their failure a re- *» sion year. msjor league career, which be- as manager. This m g. •>*.. / v X this season vJF placement for tore-armed Bob they've matched that perform- “ The Athletics, though 7'a gan in 1944 with Brooklyn. He _ behaving unpredlct- .A .a. 4 gXi'-i -r Buhl has been one reason they games behind New York, gave up six hits, wslked none ance after ably at the outset.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing a Very Light Jet
    GadShannan DESIGN Akademin för Innovation, Design och Teknik Designing a Very Light Jet Master thesis work 30 credits, D-level Product and process development, concurrent engineering Master Thesis Programme Innovation and Product Design Per Nyblom Report code: IDPPOPEXD:08:11 Commissioned by: GadShaanan DESIGN Tutor (company): Mladen Barbaric Tutor (university): Ragnar Tengstrand Examiner: Rolf Lövgren Abstract Introduction Very light jet is a hot subject growing stronger and stronger. The new type of air craft is an air plane that weighs less than 10000 pounds and uses a jet engine. Problem The student was proposed to designing a conceptual very light jet that could be used for inspiration and accepted the challenge. Method In this thesis the reader can follow the project progress in detail, the proposed methods and the results. The student divided the project into four activities analysis, creation, development and documentation. Result The project ended with a concept very light jet with simple specifications. Illustrations for inspirational usage and a simulation testing for verification of the proposed concept specifications. Keywords: Nm 1 nautical miles = 1.852 kilometres lb 1 pound = 0.45359237 kilograms ft 1 foot = 0.3048 metres in 1 inch = 0.025 metres MTOW Maximum take-off weight Pax Available Seats in an airplane both crew and traveller VLJ (micro jet) Very Light Jet, coined expression. FAA Federal Aviation Administration, www.faa.gov EASA European Aviation Safety Agency, www.easa.eu.int CAA Civil Aviation Authority PDF File format standard Intelligence Information that is presented easy to act on. Thrust Power given by a jet engine measured in pounds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Derby Days 1 Hoop Jr
    2020 DERBY DAYS 1 HOOP JR. 2 DARK STAR 3 GALLANT FOX 4 WAR ADMIRAL JIM MYLLYLA - BLACK GENO ALESSANDRINI - BLUE PAUL BUJOLD - BLACK PAUL MENGHINI - BLACK CLAY SHAKER - BLUE MIKE HORTON - W BEN LEWIS - BLUE KEITH HAMMOND - BLUE RON SENDZIK - W FRANK RAHOI - W MATT GERARD - BLUE MIKE CONSTANTINI - W HEATHER HIATT - G JEAN ANN PEARSON - G PAUL SWANSON - W KRISTIE MARKELL - G DENNIS STRAND - G DAVE SANDERS - G HOLE #2 PEGGY FREEMAN - R JAY HUNTER - G HOLE #1B HOLE #3A HOLE #1A ANDREA COLLINS - R LINETTE HILLER - G SALLY BLOM - R SHANNON SANDERS - R 5 CITATION 6 MAJESTIC PRINCE 7 DUST CAMMANDER 8 NORTHERN DANCER RYAN GORDON - BLACK CHRIS NINOMIYA - BLACK JIM MARKELL - BLACK JIM PERICOLOSI - BLACK JEFF MURARO - BLUE AL HOCHSTEIN - BLUE ANTHONY SANTONI - W TONY SLEIK - BLUE CHARLIE MENGHINI - W DAN ST. ARNAULD - W JOHN FORTIER - W MARK NOSKEY - W WADE EDWARDS - W DAN PUCCI - W BRIAN LUCAS - G CAROL ST. ARNAULD - G BETH VERRETTE - R DEB DAVIS - R JEAN MELLON - R RON SOLBERG - G HOLE #4A HOLE #4B HOLE #5A HOLE #3B MARY ANN FLAMINIO - R DONNA RAHOI - R DARLEEN SMITH - R WENDY ZAMBON - R 9 ASSAULT 10 NEEDLES 11 CAVALCADE 12 TWENTY GRAND SCOTT SANDERS - BLACK STEVE FLAMINIO - BLACK ADAM HUSING - BLACK LUKE WAHOVIAK - BLACK PHIL KNOP - BLUE DAN DELONG - BLUE RUSS KASSIN - BLUE RANDY RYAN - W BRIAN TIRSCHEL - W MIKE CELELLO - BLUE STEVE COUGHLIN - W DEREK KOLLER - W JEFF CAMPBELL - W KEITH ZAMBON - W JOHN HILLER - G BOB RUMPF - G JAN STRAND - G SHEREE RICE - R MARY ELLEN WELCHER - R BECKY CECCONI - G HOLE #6 HOLE #7A HOLE #7B HOLE #5B DONNA PERICOLOSI
    [Show full text]
  • Business Aviation a Boardroom Issue
    MAKING BUSINESS AVIATION A BOARDROOM ISSUE SPECIAL PRE-PRINT REPORT BY FIRST MAGAZINE, CELEBRATING EBACE 2017 An Ever-Resilient Industry Readies For A Much-Needed Rebound usiness Aviation has had its share of partnership with NBAA hosting the annual billion in time saved annually by European ups and downs certainly, but being European Business Aviation Convention companies using business aviation for their Ba cyclical industry and subject to the & Exhibition (EBACE) also shared the employees; and EUR 2,840 in average whims of global economic conditions, it good news that business aviation traffic productivity gains per passenger, per trip. has remained resilient and persistent over figures rose for the fifth consecutive (For more information, visit www.ebaa.org.) the years. Industry leaders have learned to month in March compared to the same cope amazingly well, under the most trying period in 2016. As Brandon Mitchener, Manufacturers’ R&D Investments Drive conditions. As Ed Bolen, President and the recently appointed Chief Executive Business Aviation Industry CEO of NBAA (National Business Aviation Officer of EBAA was pleased to report, In a sense, manufacturers are continuing to Association) notes, “It’s almost impossible “After several years of sluggish growth, the create their own “pent-up demand” for new to predict what we’ll see on the world stage signs are favourable for a new direction in products and technologies across all sectors over the next several years. But reliable 2017, with first quarter traffic figures up of the industry, while lending a measure indicators do point to continued, measured 6.7 percent from a year ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Light Jet Arrives: Stakeholders and Their Perceptions
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 12, No. 1 -2007 THE VERY LIGHT JET ARRIVES: STAKEHOLDERS AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS Richard Cobb Jacksonville State University Jacksonville, Alabama James L. Thomas Jacksonville State University Jacksonville, Alabama Laura A. Cobb Auburn University Auburn, Alabama ABSTRACT This article summarizes the initial results of a systematic study that addressed issues related to the direct and indirect market impact of very light jet (VLJ) aircraft. Although reports in the popular press offer wide-ranging estimates of the impact that these new jets will have on existing air travel, no systematic data exists that may be of use to all potential stakeholders. This introductory study serves to describe potential VLJ users and their perceptions of this new type of aircraft. _____________________________________________________________________________ Richard Cobb (Ph.D., The University of Alabama) is a professor of management at Jacksonville State University. His research has appeared in such publications as Simulation, Quality Progress, Academy of Strategic Management, Journal of Air Transport Management, and the Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies. He has been published in numerous conference proceedings. James L. Thomas (Ph.D., University of Mississippi) is currently an associate professor of marketing at Jacksonville State University. His research has appeared in such publications as the Journal of Retailing, Business Ethics Quarterly, Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, and the Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice. He has also published papers in several national and regional conference proceedings. Laura A. Cobb (MBA, Auburn University) is a cost specialist in the market research and technology department of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirrus Vision SF50 Update
    PERSONAL JET Cirrus Vision SF50 update Cirrus Vision SF50 is a composite fully pressurized aircraft. The OEM is considered one of the pioneers of composite airframe construction. To date, Cirrus has delivered 6300 composite airframes without a single structural failure. Certification of the $1.96 million single-engine personal jet enters the home stretch with customer deliveries expected mid-year. By Stuart Lau Order book 18 to 24 months later, full produc- ATP/FE/CFII Airbus A300-600, tion will peak out at over 100 aircraft Boeing 747, 747-400, 757/767, Popularity of the Cirrus SR20 and per year. CRJ and Saab 340 SR22 series continues as the Vision Jet nears certiication. For the past 2 irrus Aircraft is entering the years, Cirrus has delivered over 300 An integrated digital aircraft inal stages of certiication for new aircraft annually maintaining its Cirrus Perspective Touch by Garmin Cthe world’s irst single-engine leading-in-deliveries position. In all, was introduced in late 2015 as the personal jet: The Cirrus Vision SF50. Cirrus has delivered over 6300 high new avionics system designed spe- Targeting mid-2016 for certiication performance single-engine piston ciically for the Vision SF50. Based and entry into service, this $1.96 aircraft. Many of these current Cir- on the Garmin 3000 avionics suite, million aircraft will establish a new rus customers have placed deposits the Perspective Touch system fea- category positioned neatly between for the new Vision SF50. To date, the tures the latest turbine-class touch- the single-engine turboprop and company has chalked up nearly 600 screen-based lightdeck.
    [Show full text]
  • RUNNING STYLE at Quarter Mile Decidedly 1962 9 9 ¼ Carry Back 1961 11 18
    RUNNING STYLE At Quarter Mile Decidedly 1962 9 9 ¼ Carry Back 1961 11 18 Venetian Way 1960 4 3 ½ Wire-To-Wire Kentucky Derby Winners : Horse Year Call Lengths Tomy Lee 1959 2 1 ½ American Pharoah 2015 3 1 Tim Tam 1958 8 11 This listing represents 22 Kentucky Derby California Chrome 2014 3 2 Iron Liege 1957 3 1 ½ winners that have led at each point of call during the Orb 2013 16 10 Needles 1956 16 15 race. Points of call for the Kentucky Derby are a I’ll Have Another 2012 6 4 ¼ quarter-mile, half-mile, three-quarter-mile, mile, Swaps 1955 1 1 Animal Kingdom 2011 12 6 Determine 1954 3 4 ½ stretch and finish. Super Saver 2010 6 5 ½ From 1875 to 1959 a start call was given for Dark Star 1953 1 1 ½ Mine That Bird 2009 19 21 Hill Gail 1952 2 2 the race, but was discontinued in 1960. The quarter- Big Brown 2008 4 1 ½ Count Turf 1951 11 7 ¼ mile then replaced the start as the first point of call. Street Sense 2007 18 15 Middleground 1950 5 6 Barbaro 2006 5 3 ¼ Ponder 1949 14 16 Wire-to-Wire Winner Year Giacomo 2005 18 11 Citation 1948 2 6 Smarty Jones 2004 4 1 ¾ War Emblem 2002 Jet Pilot 1947 1 1 ½ Funny Cide 2003 4 2 Winning Colors-f 1988 Assault 1946 5 3 ½ War Emblem 2002 1 ½ Spend a Buck 1985 Hoop Jr. 1945 1 1 Monarchos 2001 13 13 ½ Bold Forbes 1976 Pensive 1944 13 11 Riva Ridge 1972 Fusaichi Pegasus 2000 15 12 ½ Count Fleet 1943 1 head Kauai King 1966 Charismatic 1999 7 3 ¾ Shut Out 1942 4 2 ¼ Jet Pilot 1947 Real Quiet 1998 8 6 ¾ Whirlaway 1941 8 15 ½ Silver Charm 1997 6 4 ¼ Count Fleet 1943 Gallahadion 1940 3 2 Grindstone 1996 15 16 ¾ Bubbling Over 1926 Johnstown 1939 1 2 Thunder Gulch 1995 6 3 Paul Jones 1920 Lawrin 1938 5 7 ½ Go for Gin 1994 2 head Sir Barton 1919 War Admiral 1937 1 1 ½ Sea Hero 1993 13 10 ¾ Regret-f 1915 Bold Venture 1936 8 5 ¾ Lil E.
    [Show full text]
  • Derby Day Weather
    Derby Day Weather (The following records are for the entire day...not necessarily race time...unless otherwise noted. Also, the data were taken at the official observation site for the city of Louisville, not at Churchill Downs itself.) Coldest Minimum Temperature: 36 degrees May 4, 1940 and May 4, 1957 Coldest Maximum Temperature: 47 degrees May 4, 1935 and May 4, 1957* (record for the date) Coldest Average Daily Temperature: 42 degrees May 4, 1957 Warmest Maximum Temperature: 94 degrees May 2, 1959 Warmest Average Daily Temperature: 79 degrees May 14, 1886 Warmest Minimum Temperature: 72 degrees May 14, 1886 Wettest: 3.15" of rain May 5, 2018 Sleet has been recorded on Derby Day. On May 6, 1989, sleet fell from 1:01pm to 1:05pm EDT (along with rain). Snow then fell the following morning (just flurries). *The record cold temperatures on Derby Day 1957 were accompanied by north winds of 20 to 25mph! Out of 145 Derby Days, 69 experienced precipitation at some point during the day (48%). Longest stretch of consecutive wet Derby Days (24-hr): 7 (2007-2013) Longest stretch of consecutive wet Derby Days (1pm-7pm): 6 (1989 - 1994) Longest stretch of consecutive dry Derby Days (24-hr): 12 (1875-1886) Longest stretch of consecutive dry Derby Days (1pm-7pm): 12 (1875 - 1886) For individual Derby Day Weather, see next page… Derby Day Weather Date High Low 24-hour Aftn/Eve Weather Winner Track Precipitation Precipitation May 4, 2019 71 58 0.34” 0.34” Showers Country House Sloppy May 5, 2018 70 61 3.15” 2.85” Rain Justify Sloppy May 6, 2017 62 42
    [Show full text]
  • Special Citation Jet Owners Section!
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT SEPTEMBER 2016 $3.95 US VOLUME 20 NUMBER 9 The Birth Of The CJ Six Things You Must Have 2016 CJP Convention NBAA Focus SPECIAL CITATION JET OWNERS SECTION! Contents SEPTEMBER 2016 • VOL. 20, NO. 9 EDITOR FEATURES LeRoy Cook EDITORIAL OFFICE 2 Editorial 2779 Aero Park Drive Satisfaction Assured Traverse City, MI 49686 Phone: (660) 679-5650 4 The Birth Of The CJ E-mail: [email protected] The CJ’s First Flight Wasn’t Easy PUBLISHERS – LeRoy Cook J. Scott Lizenby Dave Moore 8 Post Maintenance Flights 4 PRESIDENT Twin Proficiency Dave Moore 10 Three Oshkosh Topics CFO J. Scott Lizenby – Thomas P. Turner PRODUCTION MANAGER 17 NBAA Focus Mike Revard From The Flight Deck PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR Jake Smith 24 Retire Me Not – Kevin R. Dingman GRAPHIC DESIGN 11 Luana Dueweke 30 En Route: ADVERTISING DIRECTOR Embraer Introduces Phenom 100EV John Shoemaker Textron Announces The Cessna Denali Twin & Turbine Daher Offers TBM Elite Privacy Option 2779 Aero Park Drive Traverse City, MI 49686 Phone: 1-800-773-7798 Special Section! Fax: (231) 946-9588 [email protected] 32 Spring Training REPRINT SALES DIRECTOR – Kevin Ware 32 MEDIA COORDINATOR ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE Six Things You Simply Must Have ASSISTANT 36 Betsy Beaudoin – David Miller Phone: 1-800-773-7798 [email protected] 40 CJP Convention In New Orleans – Rob Finfrock SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Rhonda Kelly Perspectives: Diane Chauvin Jamie Wilson 42 Hold That Thought Molly Costilo P.O. Box 968 – Kevin R. Dingman 40 Traverse City,
    [Show full text]