GNORING
COMPASSIONATE
HE
UNIVERSITY
EDITED
OR
NATURE
The
BY
CHICAGO
Case MARC
CONSERVATION
PRESS for
BEKOFF
NO
MORE Part
One
2
4 3 1 S
Contents Benjamin Foreword it Who Preface Acknowledgments Ethics, ohn The Trying Environmental Venturing 7a. The A Talking Eileen Ecocide Dale Conservation, Ben
Shouldn’t
Pragmatic
Animal Infirm
A. Lives,
A. °eterscn
to
Crist Conservation,
Minteer
about Vucetch
and
Make B
beyond
Ethical
Who
BeA,q Beck Protection
the
View
Bushmeat
Difficult Animal Education
Dies,
Extinction and
about Foundations the of
the Michael and
and
Tyranny Rights, Movement,
Decisions
Us
“Bushmeat
Animal
Why
of
P.
and
Animal
of
of
Nelson
Easier Protection Small
Conservation
Conservation,
Human
Crisis”
Minds
Differences
Welfare
and
45 27 63
77
9 Part
Part
Three
Two
10
6
12 7 8
9 13 14
Conservation
Why Guidelines
Decision Learning Joel Cautionary Danel
Coyotes,
Why Camilla
“Predator Why Animal
Reversing Marco Toward Reintroductions
Importance Przewalski’s Philip from
Lessons Why Sarah
Liv Conservation It The
Animal
Engaging Conservation, Brian
Eric
All
Baker
Berger
We
Ignoring
Evolutionary Imperative
J.
Individuals the
Comes
J. T.
P. Czech
Festa-Bianchet
Restorations
Shelton
Evolutionarily H.
Really Seddon Blumstein Welfare
Making
in to
Compassionate B.
Brink
Management”
for Fox
the
with Animal
Wildlife
Fail
King
of
Horses
Behavior
Down
Restoring,
Nature
Extinction
Economics
Behavioral
Don’t of
Biodiversity,
or
the
of and in
to
Matter
Extinction
Failing
Biology
Welfare Conservation
Steady
“Ratchet
to Tales
Conservation
and
Yolanda
Means
Care
Sustainable
Money
and
Recreating,
Red of
Conservation,
to
Research and
about
State
Is
and “Enlightened
Experience
Ineffective
Learn?
and
tip”
Important van Wolves
Politics
Conservation
Economics
Tourism
(and
the
Economy Heezik
Public
Harvest
for
and
Evidence
How
Species
through
and
for
Perceptions
Redecorating
Management”
in
Management
to
Conservation
New
Coexistence
for
Change
in
Brought
Wild
Zealand
EvidenceBased
of
This)
Nature
Biodiversity
Back ,....
103
95 125
113 119
137
153
159
167
183
171
Part
Part
Four
Five
16 15 20
17
18
19
22
23
21
Anthropological for Human Fostering
Nature Barbara
Conservation Susan Human
The Lessons The Pohlip Consuming David Empathy, Children, Carrie the The Oin
Culture,
to Using
Compassionate 4 Daniel Explaining A Cultural Peter India’s Vivek The
Paradigm
Triangular
Animals Protect
Mass Interconnectedness
War
Cultural
F.
Social,
Tedeschi,
Clayton Johns
J. Empathy
Packwood
Menon
and Dimensions
Ramp, Resilience
Natural
J.
Gene
from
L
Religion, on
Tradition
Media
Environmental
Animals,
Conservation
King
Animals
Animals
and
China’s
Nature Economic,
Nature—Turning
Politics Shift
Social Playing Other
Dror
Myers
Sarah
Heritage
and Other
Conservation Perspectives
Freeman
for
and or
and
Ben-Am
of
and
Wildlife
Movements
in
Compassion
Work
of
Politics Jr
Wildlife
Field M.
Social
Nature
Human
Spirituality
and
Animals
Social
Education,
Their
of
Bexell, Identity
and Biodiversity
Ethical
Crisis
Justice,
Keely
of
the
Homes
Management
on
Neuroscience Social
Jason
and
and Development
and
Tide? to
Ignoring
Context and
Boom
Jolie Develop
the
Conservation
Interactions Empathy,
Leigh
Activism
Health
Environment
NeSmith
and
Nature
of
in
Jarvis
a
Australasia
Conserving
David and
Unified
and
History
Compassion
B.
in
Global
Croft
Movement
205
223 197
237
257
295 287
211 271
331
7 24 25
26
Conservation Josphat
Biocultural Is Avatar
Bron
Anthony
The
Some Moving
About Marc
Contributors’
Index
Green
Search
Taylor
Bekoff
Closing
the
Ahead
Ngonyo
Religion
L.
Evolution
Contributors
Rose
for
and
Contact
Words
Biosynergy
with
and
and
an
Its
Heart,
Oxymoron?
Mariam
Challenges and
A
Information
Gabriela
Earthly
Peace, and
Wanjala
Compassion
in
Rose
Spirituality
and
Kenya
Compassion ....,......
343
353
405 389 379 361 399
Foreword
THE
in (some seems were elements, inhabitants of seven more more
and rates, know we all takes not other
“needless” ing of and tending
their
our
One
Another other thinkers.
Marc
should
to
be less
TWENTY-SIX
protectionism
taken
and
of billion such use
solar the to it.
animals
this
descriptions
is
seen
these
be animals. beautiful “Conservation” to
the
Bekoff
more lands, a
form
that
“Nature.” from capital not
system of exploitation.
conservation more
Nature
Some
people
as product
the
natural
by
be
of
privileged Nature
of waters,
has
space,
We planet than
these
humans.
N,
seen
argue
forms needless as
COMPELLING of for of
(going
been
and
are of
Nature).
processes the these
one
decades, is none
natural
as processes, all
Earth
that
said is
“Protectionism”
some that being (hence
nature exploring
dualistically
or
of
on
attending
“Nature.”
Ihere
essays
exploitation
of
the attending to
morally
eleven
eventually
(although Ignoring
assign
resources our
irreversibly
be
and and
of
microbes,
the
is and
so
is
the
authors
ESSAYS
the
no
here interactions, billion), the
double-barreled
much to
a
superior.
interactions
“Nature”
female
separate, to
consensus this this intersections
unity
iconic
and of may
has or protectionism
plants,
alike mentions transformed
inthisbookdifferwidely and Nature
“Nature.”
“Compassion”
using interfering
mounted
gender).
not
of
photos
Ignoring
that
even in
and human
at
animals,
support
on we
so
and
takes
faster is
humans any
“compassionate of many
exactly cruelty
can
being
of
Indeed,
transforming an
conservation
facilitates into
animals in
this
the
this other
observe
expedition and
life
more chemical
ways is
ignored
simpler form
Nature
what
toward Nature attend
should
there faster as
parts
and that
and
we
as of
at
is 2 Venturing SmaI
The
Conservation,
Paul AS
to such one relationship. two remain have
ignore which
tives, I imagination the ing
chooses and the one conservation the
cessful protection today. movements,
argue
another
To ONE
By rnegarnovements finds advocates
insights relationship
core
at as Animal
opportunities
can
Waldau
be relatively
fundamental
are
the
times
The Differences “animal
that silent
social
EXAMINES
to
sure,
insights also marty
described
term
vibrant,
describe choice
the efforts
and
prompted
beyond Historically, justify
about
such
affirm of movement
the
movement
Protection
minor reasons differences protection,”
animal
prospects the
is
of
of differences
and
in
as worldwide one for
key
features
the
below, advocates conservation.
ordinal other
the
no the
has
the
because
advocates
the movement
insights
these of
possible
way the
Environmental relationship
animal often
conservation
as
found
however,
natural
movement.
of
are, other,
are
movement
“animal
of
is an
each
Tyranny
“causes”
between
Movement,
these
meant at
nature. movement been of
from
of animal
synergies, in
of protection times
is
It each
the allies.
movement
each
many meant
is the
described rights’ both
differences
of
to
to
other
possible,
ought Instead,
real. movement, the
social
protection the
suggest
name
of relationship
even
of
countries longer
known a
these
it txso
conservation
startlingly In movement and
movement
is to
Education
offer
these movement
siblings.
this as
without
this
movements,
that
have then,
social “animal by
and
tense—differences
by
chapter,
movement important
do
no worldwide chapter around
other
deeper
various between an
to
not movements
broad
stretch
However and,
quEstion
as
arm-in-arm
liberation,” reaffirm
movement
major
undermin
involve
advancing
however,
the
suggests,
perspec
thereby,
some
and
names
lessons
animal just of these
world
social
that
one
suc
the
the
im to
of
as beings 28 portant
promote an est has that
is important cess question
pace to porary of from
ment and ments a
The that Background variety species
a ing diversity
about rights” off much
of movement ways
here
deeper
strength
astonishing
this The
human
Second, relevance
Third,
human-caused
What
from
make
with in
to
to
animal
and
humans
one
to
beyond
in
framed
the
question, address the in realities,
the relationship recognition protections,
of or
the
efforts line
by
different sense in its certain
often law to another. what
ancient it
“animal
value to
skills
animal
because 1970s why
pointing
conservation different
the
movement be
is
inception
and,
to
the
and
our
encounter
array in
attempting on
to an
a of
are
comes
the
has
natural
addresses
that of
which
lack terms groups
worldwide
develop
in
the cultural
second, species.
extraordinary legal protection”)
the
movement cultures. problems,
animal
the
in
points
recognition
it the
of of
industrialized
to
ways
in
of
riches
produces
the
living to
the
Animal
most had
of
the
education,
is animal
considers ally
part
coherence.
not
mind movement?
an
what extremely three
latter traditions. how In
studies the
made animal
than
in
rapid
decisively
of
This
reached
and
beings relevant conservation
fact, astonishing overlap
and
many
(under
animal the
PAUL
are
today both protection
can
questions.
multiple
Movement has of
part
range
in limits
growth
diversity
these
any
for
not
worldwide movement modern moral
to
be
countries this
outside
the
locales
of
diverse,
WALDAU
by
Some
of when and
the
The features
a
number
any
only rightfully
movement’s
important
these
of
of
field
efforts forms conservation
the chapter,
rights, of
facets
development
problems. variety yet
the answer
of
movement
First, movement?
animal
cannot
people
historical
the
people
our
to
nineteenth
known
social
a
its
at humanities
around animal
to
of
of
of
feature
deal
are
animal
in
own or
thought
many
why critical
the
the the
social the
points of
animal
protection
a
characterize
even
being be
around
movements
deep,
with
social
as
Others, living conservation
species. conservation
conservation animal
is
protection
movement? causes
easily proceeded
the
related
names,
movement
“religion
of
movements
the I
century “liberation
points
to
of
worked
answer
an
sustaining
critical protection
and
world.
movement
the important
as
beings animal
understood
protection
astonishing
but however,
efforts
But
“protection”
our to,
such world
this
are
call
and
and
movement.
also this
at
out
thinking of
first,
This
The
movement.
sciences. and
movement
beyond
movement movement
distinctive a diversity
clearly
upon that the
for as
roots
then
animals’ different
in
features are
opening contem develop
attempt
answer find its
the modern “animal
living great
unique move
gained
unless
asked
range
a
suc
took
for and
in
fact do
the set
the
as
a
local political
These other-than-human
even many which or justification powerful place widespread commentator
nior
ways, However cacy must stances.
industries insight such ary
Concern have about Karen
established called must religious formulation done rights
The
No ern complete no
Advocates
depends
efforts speechwriter
when
for
and
be quarters religions
age roots
age
comes
is
industrial
identified
fact
somehow
to possibilities. that
all
Armstrong
of “the
said
“the The
the
forms
time.
one
has has
you.
leading
for
all
living that
sages
that
are
has
for today
disregard.
“it
ethic upon that
axial
polarization, from beings—not
cause” ever Matthew
ever religious
of
[nonhuman
chooses of
might
As
but
dominating
is connected Venturing
of
use
the not,
conservation
farm.
the
in extend it beings
difficult
its
of
far
concern
been cultural age.”
are
inflicted
his of
in living with
diverse also
China,
antecedents nonhuman
President
Golden
modern
As
to has
her
as
kindness
easily
as
not alive (Scully
to
traditions)
Scully,
During
more be
to became
a the suggested
the
witness
beyond
2006
often
beings
characterize orthodox
recurring
animals] understanding
to the
institutions to
India,
sure,
for
which
sources.
all upon
very
Axial
and
be
Rule:
get
form
solicitous
ancient
2002,
entire
and
George
who
other
book
animal
the
had
understood
and
the
a
animals
a scenes well. beginning
produced
to of
animals Israel,
hallmark sages
do
man
promote environmental
recently, has
has
Tyranny is period
belief—was
happened
today’s
to
be
The
world. anticruelty x)
preoccupation
living
Some
such not
W.
roots
go protection, One
found
impacted (such
or
common
to
to
to were
Great
and
as
do
Bush,
it.” forward animals, such be
caricature understand
from
an
beings.
of
of
. of
animal has consistent
a
not mere
as to that .
Greece
found
concerned, Small ancient as
radical
Transformation
much .
also the religion.
others Each
an
massive
observed been religion”
those 900
only
that
shape
among
important the
resources—opposition
protections to
instance
Today,
more the Differences in
on movement
tradition
in success
taught
BCE
human-centeredness have
theme
is
the
prompted what
finds
highly
involved
movement
any
something
best-known The
results. many
values, punishments easy
curious
respect
in (Waldau human
animal
to then,
functioned given
you
best-selling
that
a
a that of
observed time
even
200
to
polarized
developed
best-selling
individuals’ fascination
have
Upton
are in
The
would
language, there
identify
day
“your
and scholars
by
for
BCE,
movement,
in cultures legal
though
in
when
2011)
ancient
example
people at also prominent
prehistory
the
caring.
important
with
how are
as
not
any
Sinclair’s
concern
systems
ancient scholar
circum
its
sacred experi his the
across
often
many
book,
advo
with have
mod lives
care own and
from
such
and
and as
and 29
Yet
sal
se
of
a
it 30 enced
array Similarly, other ment human-centeredness and
1996)
with comfort conservationists
sistence and
in to Consider
Ironically. is Inconvenient
self-indulgence ing. possibh (PEW
But the
which
A
known ecology-conscious ieligious ses jor from ture a
agriculture—in startlingly tor
ated Couple by of fauna.
(2008) reason
the sorts.
is
classic opposition faculty
was
but animal
claims some
reports, who
the
out thus
that Organization
that
by animal factory
Commission conservation
two conservationists
made it
A
for
justif} emits,
Pew
industrialized In to this
and
sunply focusing is,
inconvenient
we familiar rationalizations common of member
advocates
about
movement Join high aggressive
examples, fact,
nonetheless, Truth
such
with
there the
Charitable
farming. must
movement. for
inspired
as well-known
such of
the
figures
refuse
the it fact,
opposition our “tradition,”
the as those
anchored
(2006). on are
were, to entitled protect northwest at
animal
element
2008) advocates
the
myopia tenor
species. of as industrialized
a many many
challenges
What although agriculture
is
emendous
for to solely
majm used question
this Trusts
2006 conservation
the and
often
a
recognize Such
the
about movement
even that “Livestock’s arid frustration paradigmatic Such
reasons PAUL
report conservationists—an is in in entire
to and private
to
environmentalists
by of emission American report tragic
have
and
more a much
eating the depth opposition
“by
many invasive
the formidable
why to rcluctance myopia that
continued as pollution
WALDAII
transportation
confirms,
the
ens
power animal described
seen
most agricultures the proper4 about
United
quotidian. of
of
even the in
the more of
and
iromnentalists with Johns
of
Long
the
the
impacts decrying
law
species
some opposition form may greenhouse
more-than-human
measures,
consumer plant this,
Al and
environmental
has
United movement opposition
States some could industrialized coalition to silence
Shadow” school
Hopkins
in rights, Gore
be
of
social
give of conservationists’ been
a as
emissions
of that can
harms sector.
ignoring factory driven 2008
course,
animal
be it
there Nations abiding,
avoided greenhou’.e
laments
up
in and were, grounded
confined products dislocation in gases are and at
listed.
of
(FAQ School
to
report the spired
stems an
to times
business,
are privileges by farming. harming
conservationists
is the
protectionists’
nonhuman agriculture of
nature. Irom
and income
face protection Food that
in
the almost 2006)
that conservationists
greenhouse world
animal
of pablished
by from
his
of ignore
aminal
in reflects gas
industrialized there denial of Public problems
and factory
even opposition more
poignant a
local
political,
What
that a
of
stream. emissions
diverse (Abram autistic
the
judgment
move
Agricul
nature. many
are as
animals
produc in
Health have and/or than ways reveal oirith flora
dis a
could farm
gas
in ma have the sec
cre
An
r
tion standards” nizations Heavy allows nonhuman tion. and with repudiating
edgment, certain nomenon
wise ment major at contemporary campus tr animal man credited communities talk tive November protection). aie conservationists, potection
and disc
Public in circles One
A Harvard
the 55
ndividnaI The
the What some many
second
to
committed religious uss privilege.
stems low focus conservationists helps
explanation midwestern
larger
environmental
hint
oppose
ions. to
animal
around
American
Policy to
among
places.
secular else
ways animals,
address
on
Law rabid be
2020 nuance
concerns in example course, at
community Again,
who nonhuman
sure, a
leaders could
courses “moral common establishment Venturmg movement If
few
the
movement School
Ignoring people some
the so, forms But
and meeting
who
for
factory
opposed law the
lass that
how differences which animal they
prevent fairness
of world—for
consider
from religious
the
equivalency” discussing to
causes animal workers, in
school absolutely
some schools, of in
there beyond
to use
ignore
the share
animal of refusal
animals, on farming
human-centeredness, in
February
their can ignore Nature?
any has, movement life’s
conservationists, today
Washington, this and tyranny conservationists’
of
(some have
movement
observed
communities the the a
now operates
talk the the an maybe
then, discussions. fear
of future law
issue?
how example, balance
Tyranny refuse
nature. may been movement’s animal fall conservation-minded those natural local
(this of
2011 of be
experienced often
of
“animal both their
these short lie
is as Fairness
found motivated equally to
small as
communities’
to was
people
who
that
of a impacted require in law A DC,
give
me a
consequences—deep
each allow factor supporters SinaI!
communities
and kind the
conservationist problems of
the
so
course his in caricature differences oppose at rights”
of
much appalling profile current
and tyranny
when
individuals, from like
a year more Differences explanation of
by such representatives conservation acknowledgment
by in
conference
political by
balance
fundamentalist
animal
various at their
attention
because working
thousands the it econiche, global
are in
a
and than
their
ethical
of
comes
fear individuals
versions of
certain
could can inauguration described small fear
the
opponents
require protectionists
correctness as two-thirds
university. affiliated
climate to policy
given
they
prompt on well hand
of animal to to and colleagues
banish
differences. watersheds, foster harm
public
of of of a supporting protections animal
deem
loss
as acknowl
to
that this societal discussion Christian or conserva legislative
in below).
disrup
intrepid
me with to
move orga other in animal
animal glove
of Since of
of phe policy and
there
the
such
law 31 high
at hu
in
ac on
an
a
a 32
proposals
be protection
for
are
interests, not and
suggested, equip which
forward,
Other further
tecorvo social
it. the who
tonishingly
fundamental suggested.” These
social denominated demographics
leaders as
see and
The Worldwide First all
tion
mere
marginalized
example,
Yet
dominated and
Overall,
civil only
environmentalists.
With
real
forms
the
concludes
general
animal people
is.
movements, the
segments
background despite
Question—Why
hardest include
mention
segments
1966),
animal
rights
difficulties of
and
and for
many
are this
ideologically
into
“The
of
animal
however, the
quickly
This
example,
education publications)
activists merely
movement
now
the
sketch
completely
features
Conservation
radicals and “It’s effect.
many
segments of movement that dominated multiplicity major
in
truth
of
are,
historian conservation
are
all
important
being
movement
women’s and hard of
the
begin.”
and
the
to
in
to
it
kinds
there
course, Yet,
not graduate
in a
is
As
that
and contrmersial or efforts ideological be
is
win mind, modern key
has enough
has
that animal
made
of
by Is
the important
moderates moving
in
more
as that
by
also geographically
is
concern had of any
of the
the it.
rights.
a
had major
an
public
for
environmental without
reason
both
worldview pertaining
we
advocates Movement? PAUL
opposition
strategies
advances
But programs
and
that
important
suggests to “a version
other
effective movement
protection Animal
as
success
turn
at
far start
orientation
women
ways,
it
one environmental
policy
would,
WALDAU
of
all.
to to
group
or
is greater
significant social
to
the
a
agree
note, only philosopher-filmmaker
of conservatives—powerful
a
Such
worldwide
to revolution, where that
with
(as for
vandals
Movement three the
humans-first
cousin the diverse
discussions—in
and
younger
the and
People
are
and
if
evidenced
afterwards,
educator a
movement
impact
animal
with
moving
the
animal
certain a of
enacted,
multi-issue
importance
the
questions
youth, moving students
pattern
other
those
of
of
animal
precautions,
animal
one
for movements.
often
the
generation.
the
even but
on
movement
movement
at
groups
Important
David
within
social the
and
agenda historian by
conservation
society
astonishingly
earth.” put
is
also
a might
study
once
movement
harder movement
polarized that
curriculum,
slow
not
Ethical
agenda,
of
the an
some
Orr
conservationists
movements,
ecological
that
the
overlap we’ve
will
that
“public
uncommon
United
than
education
easily
suggests pace,
While Animal
continues still
has
(1994, (Beers
movement—
membership
are
to
Treatment
additional
help
is
diversity
milieu previousll
won, moved
movement now to
the
has
the
and
emulate.
crucial
quickly.
policy’ between
faculty
States,
even
sustain
5)
visions.
anyone
2006)
protec
bane (Pon
some
goes
can
that has still such
to for
as in
the
of
to
of
worth Animals
company 0131
and intelligence Youth profit for... significant (the tion
are tection
for six erinary only to
a ing
“s studies” day—to-day helds nailv
differences, has
an ad-antage nionsense allot’, point similarities of cxample and
telling
thirteen),
Smilar
by?”
Fin
relatively Admittedly, straight
iy”
nimaIs
about developments mainstream protection
appeal
of
Red
one
shared
that ed mulling significant organization
Culture
ther, of
Hurricane
of
peaking
of movement—overall
Medicine
puts
example
Cross.
to
those
or that
“human-animal
brings
relatively
8 such
can
points
is
features
that
world years
to
overshadow the
+
two
purpose.
and
of unconvinced
unimportant
and that percent
off
research
described
individuals
now over
Study.” to not
animal developments,
which
the
making
iAntunng
among many
home
males. subcultures
both
Public wavs—nlore
(1999—2005)
involving
in
young could
Katrina). of PETA
had regularly
intensely
be
what
two
that
minor at
some
these
female,
meaningfully
all.
had
many only an company
people movement According
common
13—14-year-aids
be motements Policy
both
itself held 13—24-year-olds
people.
the
beyond
obvious
But
because
differences studies;’
years that
just differences
individuals
made
Harvard appear female
involved in following animal today,
nearly important
it with
as
one today
on
received
at
the
the
the
is authentically the
the
“the
In
cause
about
Tufts point—something
this has
to important
obvious
today
it
world,” students animal
Tyranny
some
graduate entering grouped and
2006,
Law
pool protectionists
greatly a remain,
the
addresses
fostered
with leading
is
below.
two-to-one really and
study
would University’s
great
the
allowed
at in essential
School
study,
entering
in of
Label answer movement’s
published
thereby
either of an
29.1%
role
(the thirty under
outweigh North
means
suggests to
classes program
Small
publicity
measuring
because
global
astonishing
important
create.
issues
consider
“PETA
appears
to of
Networks,
class
one
similarities
is
of margin
to
Differences umbrella
classes
obscure women
and
brings
America
is when Cummings
that
youth in
this
its
fifty
Indeed,
about
amiss
of that
I
sizes
of
the
after
US insights
is
conservationists, directed
latest
the below
these
the education
further
the
age
When the
number
applicants
meaning over such
entirely
dissimilarities. directly
culture
veterinary
obvious in
when
ranged Inc.,
the the
most
terms
animal
would
tyranny
from group.”
the and #i
“Humanitarian
movements,
the
Equally
differences
School
2005 appeal
have
what
at
assessing
overall
a
trendsetting
the
animal
of female.
the like
marketing marketing
the frontiers involve the
runner-up
from
simi]arities
movement
in volunteer
academic
included any
mere
devasta
What
any
of
political
existen schools
“animal
vantage
of
Center
of
reveal
non
eight small
corn ani it
pro
Vet
“tyr
This
For
fact the
the
33
the are
is —
is 34
Second
Move ties Conservation Conservation upon
take habitats
active and niches high
although
individuals in mon are shared and While
movement, “others”
nearby birds, local
tiny charismatic
included
there”
against centered humans. does contexts. who to
those
ecosystems. The
to
essential As
take
mix
them communities
on
insight mammals,
individuals,
animal
at would
citizens
recognize not
the (including the
each
overlap
living beyond insights
feral
the
that
Question—Why
a metaphors,
and seriously a
there
are
It powerful.
justifications seriously
mean
animal
But nonhuman Different
mattering
list
of cannot
that protect then,
are
colonies, megafauna “neighbors”
protectionists to
and
the
beings’
call
by these
is
Movement?
This is
of the their
that
amphthians, essential
exactly
realities
impossible
individuals
raccoons,
animal
some
and
businesses,
beyond communities), public
movement the
nonhuman
upon
human
be
as
nonhuman
difference
often
cousins,
drive well-being. movements
in
Pace, social
large,
other-than-human
the
primates
denied
individuals
difference
and
that,
what such
protection
that policy
individuals,
of
to
the
animal
ignorance-driven
any
Does
community.
often
mice,
of both to
and
other and their
in
frankly,
and happen as
is
species
natural
and
that “ethics”
themselves
PAUl
ignore—other-than-human
“others”
human
their is
sometimes priorities. animals
elephants
that
ecological Beyond
work
movements
calls in the deer,
movement
and reptillans important, well-being.
as
governments living
“ethics”
and
both
Different
WALDAU
communities
are to
to
line.
have
businesses,
allies, Animal
biodiversity,
upon
means diligently
coyotes,
individual
members
whether
be
are
are
our
any beings.
call
world,
or
and
In
dogs
long
in
caricatured
worlds.
necessarily
included
in
ethics, as
and set
both
difference close has
upon
but
conservation
rely Similarly,
in
tigers
our Protection
members Ways,
and
and
harmed
of
to to a
on the The many
kindred
of
it
and
to on conservation
variety
practices
backyards evolutionary
must
fundamental
and
protect
notice
cats its
behalf so does
How
communities
and
value
focal
versions
within animal
Than
governments many
advocates
segments.
committed
as
to
is,
conservation-minded in
both
thrive
of
wolves,
not
else
spirits.
including
of
point keep
our
living of in other
the
species
species. contexts
Movement
cloaked
more
the animal
local
our fact
movement
eclipse humans aiid
of
can
households
individual
in
and
these
cousins, is
human
ethics beings
and
animals
must
moral
Clearly,
habitats For beyond.
a
who or
that
a functioning
on to
ecological
the panoply
only
sometimes
nonhuman movement to
in
also migrating
the
protecting
example,
realities
sentient
and
struggle
that live are
human-
notice
animal
count,
circle. abili
calls
those com
many many
and
lives
those or
that
Also non
“out
in
are.
of
in
community? animal
a and humans individual of in contexts. protection human explains thing broad shelters, that people a There that experience analysis altruistic predisposition ary p care as
that to-individual that have insights man local on discernible,
Focus
companion
pronounced
animal
oach
not One
different
Conservation
taking
forces center
individual-to-individual
“self-actualization
ethics, one-on-one
conservation
actors
each
great
individuals
is
theoretical
at
harming
thrive confirms
of
individuals—in
in
have
also
(Trivers
why
the feral
that
caring—in
the Such protection
the human
of responsibility
that
centers
a
(this
personal and
because
as
a individual-to-individual
This immediate
version us
with animal
motivating
encounters
so tradition if
realism Darwinian
are cats
theistic
for
actions created
natively
not
the
Venturzng
individual
that many does may
caring 2011
is cashes actors—the
the
considerations, nonhuman
individual-to-individual
efforts
and
on
true
simple
in
they
other or
is
of caring
meaning.
in
not
and
heartbeat saving
is
a
Christian animal
dogs, emphasis of is
lives
are,
survival
other ethics
of comprehends
part impacts
whether
healthy
a
out
geniuses
for account—namely,
beyond possible
in are emphasize
are Jeremy
practicality
good
words,
this
nonhuman
rational
quite
from about
beyond
one’s
as be
sensibilities and
less
less specific
words, neighbors
level
that
protectionists
kind
a
True,
explained
summary),
the
advantages
habitat
on
of
focus ethics,
on Benthsm
immediately this local the
existentially individual
an
only
of
actions
other
there
of calculations
Tyranny
is
specific
the
has
the
the the level human
ethics
nonhuman
preventing
individual-to-individual way, animals
to
some highly
and
as fauna.
others.
on
conservation a foundational
animal them—everyday choice-to-choice, they
individuals nontheistic for
are
a are
provides
central
as
by
can choice-to-choice,
of
cooperation.
side-effect also
of
living
that Robert
standpoint,
animal
itself, for humans communities.
multiple
those relevant
course, not Viktor encounter. Small
start
Further,
from
do
relevant
Thus “do-able”
provide
movement
those of
suggests
harm lives
only
beings.
in place
Peter its
a
Differences Trivers’s with
actions
specific
many
movement very
is Frankl’s
are Buddhist one although
importance
offspring,
and with of important living
grounds
vision a
from
to
to
in ways
profoundly
Why? Other Singer’s products a
easily Accordingly, self-transcendence”).
in
personal,
paradigm
a
experience individuals
circumstances.
the
human concern
day-to-day comprehensible
impact
biological is
the a
reciprocal
harms
the
beings
suggestion day-to-day
human
of
that
nonetheless
daily encounters
the
ethics,
Because ethical
understood
sense
understanding for
advocates and
standpoint
utilitarian
but
of
of
it
life. ethics-based
existentially
discernible,
suggesting for
lives in
puts individual-
important
that of
evolution
its
family
also
of for
is
features
basis a
altruism feminist
theories
specific
animal
animal
theme
a
larger
having
some
ethics.
below
of front many
had
focus
have
This
that
feel can
hu ap
for
35 by
as to
of
a 36
are meaningful
ening each enormous has
of recognition the ics ecomche can for
Third
Consider Animal
When
creates thinking tolerance. their fosters which
riches the factual den” everything
the
Paying
the
of “Animal for
year animal
though
living the By animal
exceed number requests
crucial
use
of
1933
this
ethical
individual
it limits
the
conservation-inspired
Question—What
others
us
American
students of
for
animals after a
nonetheless
optimal information,
Movement
considerations,
deeper
in
about first our attention Nobel
as
development
year
law potential
130. fewer movement
their
answer
Further, spin-offs
law” of
of
a
as
that
an
(Waldau
year,
skills
sciences in
shared
American course
this
well. the
2002.
This
individual
the
own
nsy
have
seek Prize
circumstances nonhuman
has
than sense
really
Bar
the
development importance
to
since
role
to
larger tenfold
looking Similarly, for
become “keeps
completely
insights
environment. in
2011 to
more
the education
Association and
American which a
thus
winner
and this
of
counts”
dozen
is 2000
remedying
of
law the
both all
root individual-to-individual
puts striking.
Are
intuitively values.
community?”
their
create
86)
than
question
increase
terribly
of
beyond animals lessons
schools
Conservation features.
a
about
as
American
in question
animal
the
which
PAUL
all distinct the
of
for
legal
a
40 limits,
and
in physics.
relevant
important
offered result
our
and
habitat
riches
any
When
law Most teaching
of the
silent
within about offering the
obviously WALDAU one invest
education
are
understands.
law
experience
the
recognition
but
tendency
field
Sciences importance
and of
of
species law
of
building
notices. even
such
as liarvaid
Relevant
almost
and all
to
petitions about
in habitat,
the a
it
legal
a
in
schools personal
at
important
Movement? conservation ethics
decade
the
topic with
group
though
a
the
humanities least
has
establishment
line
to can
couise. everything
200 education.
words
The in
blocks
protections
of Law
last ignore
personal wildlife
Further, fosters of — great
signed
then
magnificently one
Features tell has
on
the
interactions
law and
namely. taking
protection
science
decade,
School
skills
the
us beesi
As of
animal
power
that
offered potential
nature,
schools educational
by
a
certain
since and,
Erwin
communities,
01
basis
close deeper this
commitment,
full
coies
like conservationists
driven
took
spring
“supplies
‘who
adopted
are
of
and
of
law
as
responsibility skill
such
it
This of
emphases
accredited
rigor, to
diversity the
Schrbdinger.
to
importantly,
things
notice, something coherent
for sense can
the
of
these
course cind
our
b
the
thus 2010,
a
dynam students
benefit
sharp
its student
history
course. critical
foster
what a
hearts,
lives
of about
skills
even lot
and has
first
will
this
and
the
the
of
by
or-
of
ciring world mals though Minds cated. companion subtitle their evident well-known, animals or wildlife, The tiative people nating in haps A animal the species way see develop all Conservation’s tail emerge entire cross-cultural deeply that quiries of this
the
courses
the It
Animal suggested of
in
core with
natural
matter
street”
is
surely roost illuminate
desire
which
animal conservation
may and
ultimately degree-granting
beyond
work
the important
(http:
moving who to protection the
line— in
of
in
that
ever
insights
such
the
our
obviously the Diana Saving
in
law, multiple
International
seem
emergence
has to “close
animals
connections
feature
run
helps
of
tile
even the development
//wems-initiative.org/). protection more in
past
protect way
the
animal
the as
it
literature tile
opened
the
current
animal
the newly
‘entnnng Reiss’s
turns appealing
harmful Dolphin
of the
to
Lessons
to
animal
treatment
iconic
species in that conservation
fully.
biology, Center
second
of
fields.
tile recognize,
as
in
our
Wildlif
general
efforts
the
studies.
humans’
out,
programs
of the
representatives
many emerged
many
2011 conservation
movement—for protection
hearts.”
realities between
Union
nonhuman
dogs and
Lives.
species movement
beyond
forms.
line,
These national
of
is
paragraph for
but
about
restoration
of
of book
but is different
awareness
Enforcement other a
Today,
and
other theil, Biodiversity,
evident dangerous
mind nonetheless
the extending
for
and
field
Other
at the one
they education-based Doing
around
conservation
The
cats
both
Animal
and movement Conservation
arts Traffic
Tyranny
animals, that environmental
animals field
is
thus,
of
and
movement.
of
study—a
kinds
Dolphin
Conservation
of
developments
impoverished
in
as biology,
international
religion
so the dealing
this that
example,
animal
the the
that
heart
many humans’
implications
their
university-level
makes
group
Monitoring of
undergraduate
Protection
are involves of
chapter,
reaches
that whole social
world,
Small
has
in
rarely scientists
and
recent recuperation
to
with fields, and attention
the
protection
the
of
These exploded it
draw (http://traffic.org)
developments the
the
favorite
Differences
science—based animal
easier
and animals, Nature smaller, of
Mirror:
courses
serious focuses nonhuman efforts often
there beyond
if include
living
depths
example
but
the
it are the
System
insights’
ecological
today
fails
and
to
particularly education
and more-than-human
protection
in
is
nearby domesticated goes attention
can
(IUCN) beings
to Exploring
risks.
see less biology, history-based
on
a the focusing popularity
the and
to
care
reduce
openly
very graduate
appears
come
(WEMS)
in
well why
take clearly animals,
relevance rapid well species
breadths
approaches
if
now Thus
any
awareness
across
real
Red
one
is
of and
and naming in to
Dolphin
trade are beyond
call
known
easy on
detail, spread
seeing
domi in
many
dove levels about “two- trun
heart
even
fails List, line,
ani
also per
and
Ini
out
our the the
the
in
of
in to to 37 38 to
certain making a
Such trade
people used
animals medical own dollars
cats fed companion
inbreeding individual
other-than-human mentality to power. see found conservationists. without
to of laudable, flora
is protections
conservation Similarly, conservation
niches to
ful sense privilege the
see In
caused products
humans human-centeredness.
the also the a in in
challenge It
quality experiences summary,
companion-animal-centered to larger where the
is exotic turns that research harms are
cats breakthroughs Such human-centered
at
creates play
any spent that
category whereby all animals’ but by consumed
creates
animals that the an
and
harming
ecosystem. of
acknowledgment marketed out the
of extensions
for down species.
ignorance
are
and
it the
exclusive areas, insights life
annually.
their companion
making
produces dogs by
pressures
can
feral
the that
disturbed Consider
in
salient imbalances when any
the animals lives.
“pets”
the lots by
be
consequences, the feral
on can
in
the
even Cat
virtue to number
by
pet and
done harsh
companion the
or which of
of
world, concern brought
features
Foregrounding thrust
colon) be wildlife fact a
cats Protecting the fully
on
mere human different
how
industry. simple, harmful never-ending key
animal and has
sold
PAUL
in
of
other that realities
food
of challenged alone the
of
ways representative human animal protecting their
but risks,
imbalanced
favoritism exists.
how
into
to
of
for
serious
the
walking equivalent dominance
WALDAU
paradigm pleasurable category animal animals
the animals when human citizens such
nondogs
can Lots
that very one’s
feral
human human
cats especially
suffered
protection
domination if result
the
be
valuing. search the medical
are
of
by popularity,
such
feral cats impact)
own with
industry. of
presence the
seriously
because in
needs unowned by can
households, failure very support both of drives is and cats,
can
of
industrialized by
from definitive cat acts, merely such pleasures one-hundred-plus family
dogs for
if
create all
Dogs
problems
noncats other insights. destructive
exacerbate
the focusing someone colonies
and
is into marketable
to the
nonhumans
Lastly, like
presences. disease dogs is for of since
out really
animal see dogs,
another dog
and
among
pleasure
such the extensions
nonhuman incredibly
individual
walking
but representative of
are
and
these
are
overbreeding or
cats
center at on that dangers just
balance
willingly
cats,
animals
and
unreflectively
the countries indulged of all
cat
movement
made the cats individual-level
products
mindless
may
‘This
consequences another compromise the
of costs
can
already starvation
can with and
billion
of
most
harmful dogs wildlife of are
animals
fauna exist
with have
ecological “pets.”
amounts
is foster
refuses cause (that human
other
with often dogs
no who
beauti
of and
Imman and
form and
pro US
for a both and
and
all
way
is,
and
is
no in
F
paradigms mal have community more-than-human animals now to ment: that the
animal number conservation
to concentrating
Shared the another one There onl) efit dividual’s human living,
animal borders als pmompt possible, Focusing
between rogether
obscure some that of
consider
protection
animal
we attested, There animal widely
behooves a An that
religion.
Vv
the series
drive are,
ay protection
call
open interconnected think
example
protection species of
conclusion:
Visions
prompts
of
and international humans
paradigmatic
the comprise
important. is local that
circles family movement solely in “wildlife.” proposed movement
humans’ all
of
both
it another
movement’s doors
“backward”
cultural
Getting fact, impressive can,
any solely life—namely,
Venturing is nested
is
as
specifics
that the
so
and on
can the individuals whole, (including where community. as
civil
around then,
many
(so
the
important
human
on presence connectedness a
companion
illustrates for class
Suffice reach and communities—the conservation
divides.
that whole religious Ethics
and
evident webs
awareness, larger society,
beyond “pets.” status
prompt
and dogs local this
ways insight
powerful
in
relevant
the
of conservation
advance
a individuals
free-living
its
that
worldwide it
full companion is to world. key benefits
world.
of fauna, and of Both to the
in to Thus,
in and understanding clearly such
communities look
lives
that a understanding the understanding are animals
say Tyranny which insight the
failure to cats), and
insight
that and
animal the to
In
cross-fertilization The one’s locally and
free-living that local while
sits
not popularity
nonhuman
as
all a such
need
all
same
animal generalities in takes beneficiary
such
c this the well—the
of at is under animals) individual
there to as nonhuman
econiche.
that the and
cation
turn
protection small
and ignored. it heart an
to see the larger
key
insight, is place, mutual
involved
more
and environment, learn international one
are
of the fosters look humans’ movements. individuals
one important
paradigmatic of Differences
of
insight animals. of
how
communities
employment many and ignores
special
dominion responsible,
social himself ecosystem, the a in so all can of
more In
animals
robust enhancement but
and
comes to countless
communication the when of
in local one
conservation
exist.
place
reflective cannot
act
which there As
each realities broadly.
conservation legal nature truly
that
in
or sense,
communities version
a in
This
community, many
from both
because of
healthy
form
a in
herself,
ways
and
of alert are companion of protections of community significant the
supports be ways
our
if is
life these the an cultures are This then, circles
created
the
of also allowed one human
of
that between
the
individu larger,
move area dialectic
like
one of ani ethics, insights seen the
Earth.
39 across is
fails easily
world any
social ben the the
the yet in
that the the that
in
is
by
as 40
movements day instructive most Ecology (an workshops commitment
held in servation
sustainability mals of character others—this tions the in
as Earth 2011,
There
protection not problem and munity
these
each
a fact, These (well
association
When
ence ers”
can Mans interesting
self-transcendence.” compassion/anticruelty human many societies.
at
species. outstanding
in ignore,
but
the
xv)
as
the
(http://fore.research.yale.edu/). the movement be,
are
our social are,
above
of
our
movement two animal have
Search
The
ethical humans about development
2011 that of
a
getting is that species classroom
human
treatment
many
then, This part and
violence today
important, largest is group,
movements movements.
following
living been 8o of
a
annual is. the
for ways
example powerful
movement systems, conservation
is of more
percent
facets
human beyond experience
many as or
and
Meaning, to
the
point
the
sustained
the
community beings.
a and
members
that as
in making
whole.
of
meeting
thereby practical
than This
group’s are workshop
a
of
our section of
reasons
nonhuman
animal
of
and in of win-win the
around
animal
share “religion
Sponsored
the
course,
impacted which is As
traditions foreground the all
“self-actualization io,ooo shared
‘I
others—again. self
various PAUL true
in
practical,
his
of
more-than-human working
Viktor
benefits
humane provided
annual
context
insight
invites the a that movement
some
to allows
protection the
has
not wide approach focused is
for
world. and
WAI
emphasize
scholars
insight Yale
animals,
wisdom world)
in shapes
Franki by
only by
a that
other
conference. At
driving
of range the
fact humans an recognition together very
ecology”
DAU sustainability-focused education
the
a
more
University’s
the
a
revealing for
on
invitation began
larger
been biologically
that that easily species—paradoxically it American
(1982, self-identify offers
our
and high
traditions American
human teaching our of
is
matters
than the
the
to
possible
secular
deepens
character the our
teachers), to movement
originally world
local community. percentage
become
surmount benefits
following
and
115)
particular A
example notice of
our
message
individuals
to own Forum
high
not
Academy
about how
environment,
anchored the wrote rich
understand Academy
that cultures
oniy treatment
as
the
whether
and as
as profile
and to religious. driving
in
there world
both
on
is has ftilly passage
of of
driving nonhuman any
as
of
in individuals
humans.
value religious
practices
our our
many how Religion
take hut a
humans his of
as emerged,
in
of differences conservation side-effect human
is
full
workshop
this larger Religions these
children’s
well. insight of also
sni
the Religion influential
a
the
of
seriously, insights (Waidau
religions, So
and
robust
of
human
all-scale
experi
animal
crucial tradi for
con
and it
as and
other
“oth it ani to
coIn
and
the
is
a the we is, of
of
F
seeing war wars. Because Arid without
any
oppressions that lished Humanity.
defining Indeed, though harm the of other worse
and other, the rights women (Kristoff
Beyond
of This
We
by Our
sive
indigenous
on
hope
If
problem nothing violence The
have men in in Durant
New There
genocide-based
one one
all
visited
each Worse comparable
is
time, than all this destructiveness, even
Violence
are a
our
some
global know for
important
that
characteristics.”
war. were around been
our mass
York is the
and The
is routine the
other,
that
war tempted human
Goidhagen,
dating larger (1968)
could
strengthens Than occurred
human-on-human of genocides people upon this
that Few
statistics
killed
killed murder Times
peoples author WuDunn
X’enrurng
cause
course
or need
the
pattern
our Better
in
believe
genocide,” War: form time from be
“gendercide”
because, the
observed
species
addition
in in world. to try
Magazine
accounts
our
of worse
talk
explains after
in
that all good on
the amend have
indigenous,
of
the
period.”
to
of Genocide, beyond “mass
our
our
past
2009.
One fullest
will
the the the
today
of
soften
human-on-human
last
another, beginning
the
has
as than
likely reason
time.”
to violence ability
that
there
abuse twentieth wars centuries,
change.
particularly
the
suggested fifty of murder war published problem his the
violence, long
in
xvii) that attention.
this
war, over
mass
Eliniinationisin, Tyranny “nothing
title any been
of
there
remains
years. of The
to
so
to
small-scale
had human
the of
tragedy
girls
describing often
commit frequently be
in the
one
in
and
killing century the
of
article
destroyed Goldhagen
are
of twentieth
above, 2009 concerned. a
precisely
a
this
of genocidal
are last
tragic So
decade deep twentieth
course, cover
that worse centers also eliminations
Small
behavior
by
oppression.
even numbing.
way
3,421 further
are
Daniel
included
societies
many
the astounding directly
concern and,
set
extraordinary
Differences story
than
and than
rivaled
because during (xi): though
there century.
on
persistence reminds
killing years,
of
century,
The
in
other
violence, in
Jonah
the
nation-against-nation
problems
war”
It people announcing, aggregate,
or recent
is
excerpts still
appears are over historians
On
by our
only
Ongoing it much
is
indirectly
human-on-human they
More
fact
is adage
us, worse
Goldhagen
has
among
August stories in
age were how often
just
268 decades
of
were that
“More existence.
harm
been
other
has that
girls
of
from any
than
to
than Assault
as
often had
slaughtered Will such
war-based
assumed
of
“women’s our
23, been
claiming girls.
more “nothing
afflicted curtailing
are
one
violence.
done
groups
yet
gives been a in
war.
pub 2009,
and mas
age’s
we
killed book
41
form any the than
girls
Al on
an
to 42
any other
tinction species
and animals also yond
to But
identifying
are are
some servationists violence. regard yet
human
Condusion—The continue in advocates be choice
discussion Lappe). tions
Conservation ing which together, sarv predicament.
Advocates
wildlife
One
form
order
described willing while
its ignored
more recognize Thiough
people
the forms
of
zoos,
murders
of
habitat. to line
—we important
caused life.
we community
we of
species
This
to
animal
any
conservation-minded And
habitat,
to
and
of
violence
the described
to arid of offer
invite in make
(Waldau can
The even
tyrannize
the writing of can
today form
as
insight violence
talk
that
a
once
full
its
insights
Enter by but of research
conservation conservationist
number
line.
name
protection. animal
two
a
solve
as can the habitat,
living push
feature human
about
range
of very there
also
still
develops one
that
Future they
this it
violence 2011, was
Conservation movements
reader again
be
the better. war, to some
are
as yet
movement, wish special
is
beings,
laboratories. of
must forms is
of
a hook
me. the
are
of
acts, problems the
used cooperation
also cclehration
xv) violence an
another
ways,
the
genocide,
to the
forms Wifl
basis
perspectives is to
in
know strengthens
animal PALL astonishing
yield
I of
eliminate
driven
of or citizens about wisdom
to importance
hope—namely,
and came ignore our animal
the
discussed
violence such Be
the
violence, foi
of
and we
lend
to done
species
WALDAU
of
global midst—what
moral.
coniiec’ting Although human-on-human
Chosen movement
m
by to relentless
the
habitat
can
of
between the
as
these animal
naturally
or movement,
understand our
here
any
concluding intentionally
the
the
our and human amount
animal
choose
against
problem
climate
in into what
of
legal,
great
risk
world practices,
with
ability accelerated
destruction,
this character
protection
protecting
as
conservation mass that
extinction,
to
are has
that
does
protectionist
juggernaut?
to suggested need
and
we
an of
sentient
chapter
the
change
then,
we
that
concerned face of to
seriognc5 a
we violence
insight
minor
destruction
do
enYironmental to particular it
meaning
rationalize
violence
to
want”
disingenousness
violence
that
matter ammal
squarely. BOW nonhuman
in is
connect share
other-than-human
rate
can,
as countless
living
that
erase above,
differences factory
that
can
activists
live
our
(Frances in that
of
ethics—”Every
with
of this
when that
rights,
its
a beyond
could
concern help better
species
yet beings
to ]ife ho of heritage our
iii In
we
some
advocates
concern.
farms,
violence
animals. we the wildlife
a
a
unneces another
k-length
implica
right us working
and do world
equally
time as
Moore
if
might
harm
mean
with
con the see
that
ex be
we most
for
the
and in
to
in
in
I
which
religions healing rather active nurture
and is
References
one
Ph’air
A Bee
Dosant, Crotkl. i,,idhagen.
to ,aoe
i ocr,
I Ps,ruis Re .3
S
leave
sorod apr.s. c’s
ostrong,
,sro,
‘s5jrk. tilts-, rh
aldau, Lnvrcc Schuster. 1
fur th,rriiieity
luuimamsilai Lappe.” St
o
SiC: Hopkins Pictures. citivens ,‘orls busson: ss our Srok: choice
than ,
t’rs,
a
Coma
Das
i
insights
individuals’
corso. De,iie. p://69.93.14.237/. \Tbmcsi b \lhert.
Usired Neinc,rks
Diana.
Do F)asid. traditions
I viktor
SI.
Will, Nn.
lsiand
Farm for
Kiropf. rscces id.
Robeit,
political
Paul.
omental
St. Basic
about
and
division, http://www.smallplanet.org.
2002.
Kaien. holas
Ission
99r.
Houghton Daniel.
Blooinbeig
(OlIn. our
MerGe’s
States.
2006. aooh. we
and
iaresoutls Ness
Worldwide.
Animal
2011.
i996. in
F.
Press.
2011.
tgricuiture
Books.
Moore.
ft. Venturi
2011, being
2006
D.,
19’. can Foci
on Doonttiiiti: each F
children.
issues
aoo6,
Sock:
i906. artli New
An
For
Athens:
2009.
systems The
i and
industIial Animal struggle
ethical
Press. he
Pioduction
1w
‘slim TI5,’
make
Durant.
the
dir
The
is
“Hunianitarisii culture.stude
Sc Si
York:
Spell
Dolphin of
PublicAtiairs. and rig
Shc’r
The linked New
Direa
oncenient
MS si The
hool
Peerr
14 Follr
Organization
tinconseiosss in
Rights. these An
Swallow
beyond prospect Tl’
orse
Options’
Greet
of
d:
Haccos.ri.
Rodaie York:
Soc. l as
Farm character
abstract
of have
1968.
ia
of the
slier,
Pu to
Os
Psirer
in
Thor
ii Public
a to Lappe. Fool
rh
New
Irarisformation:
Truth: Senssions,
Dsuir,
the movements Edw gain
Alfied
Animal Ame’iica.” way
Press/Ohio the
,,C,
The
Press.
the
2006.
slipped
of ww.fao.org/dor \Var. Baltic’
: Mirror
God:
Youth York:
oittimi, is The of
Health. of
Tyranny
‘sian. Lessons
The
selF.
the 2009. to
1 A animal the
available
Im is
conservation’s
Pr Genocide.
I
of Pss’clsottierapy New
Planetary
onc Knopf.
celebrate
Osford
Lturirss
a
.5 liii’ United Exploring pluctior Otils Culture
spiritual The
ilguer into
soothing
Unisersity half
of
Proeri
cit
.Suffs York:
The
of
will History. H:u
tie
Dc,’e
movement’s
at
University
nictit
Small
an In’ Flis’ima
Nations.
Home Begitiriing
0mg Emergency
Oripio, .
Studs:’
rep/oso/aoyose/ao7om
Pantheon. http:l/www.humanespot.org/content/
2003
Dolphin
of
Sky: choose
it
appalling
the
end
end character
and yt
New Press. and
The’
one,
Differences
.trimals, us
)ioriiuyi
/s
I I
2006.
Sc protective,
Retriesid world
Putting Theology. the
Pen
lit rniog
ii
Press. Yoik: g.icv
of
Winds If
of
to This mcc’s
Our .Huisiis
Dr’
Global
Clsaritable
power
La
Oppr
asd
work
Simon arid Livesiock’s f
lack
ept
Religious
Meat
asd
we
to
Srnn’al
Moss bat
can
New
ion
.\ugust
the
esirrn
Warming
Mo t’e
proniote
Saving
oglto
want
of
on
in together.
and
Ongoisg
e happen constructive, Gall to
pm York:
8hts
Hunian
Trusts
Lappe th civility,
oo.H
Traditions.
into
ch
Long Schustes.
instill F
to .
Dolphin
and
to Algcri.
‘East
2006.
ippor’uniry
able:
Simon
her’
FM.
1’
Assault
am and
Shadow: live
life. What
peace
if
d
Ingron.
This
and lndu’,
and
Ria .
Johns New the
Lives. Ann,, from
Ness 43 and Ness
in
1,Ark
on
to