DOCSLIB.ORG

The Contested Concept of Growth Imperatives: Technology and the Fear of Stagnation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Contested Concept of Growth Imperatives: Technology and the Fear of Stagnation A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas Working Paper The contested concept of growth imperatives: Technology and the fear of stagnation Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics, No. V-414-18 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics Suggested Citation: Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2018) : The contested concept of growth imperatives: Technology and the fear of stagnation, Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics, No. V-414-18, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, Oldenburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/184870 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ www.econstor.eu Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics The contested concept of growth imperatives: Technology and the fear of stagnation Oliver Richters Andreas Siemoneit V – 414-18 November 2018 Department of Economics University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics V-414-18, November 2018 The contested concept of growth imperatives: Technology and the fear of stagnation Oliver Richtersa, Andreas Siemoneitb a International Economics, Department of Economics, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114–8, 26129 Oldenburg (Oldb), Germany, [email protected]; b ZOE. Institute for future-fit economies, Thomas-Mann-Str. 36, 53111 Bonn, Germany. Abstract: Economic growth has become a prominent political goal worldwide, despite its severe conflicts with ecological sustainability. Are ‘growth policies’ only a question of political or individual will, or do ‘growth imperatives’ exist that make them ‘in- escapable’? We structure the debate along two dimensions: (a) degree of coerciveness between free will and coercion, and (b) types of agents affected. Carefully derived micro level definitions of ‘social coercion’ and ‘growth imperative’ are used to discuss several mechanisms which are suspected to make economic growth necessary for firms, households, and nation states. We identify technological innovations as a systematic necessity to net invest, trapping firms and households in a positive feedback loop to increase efficiency. Due to its resource consumption, the competitive advantage of a novel technology is often based on a violation of the meritocratic principle. The resulting dilemma between ‘technological unemployment’ and the social necessity of high employment can explain why states ‘must’ foster economic growth. Politically, we suggest market compliant institutions to limit resource consumption and redistribute economic rents. Keywords: economic growth; social coercion; growth imperative; technology; re- source consumption; unemployment. JEL: D11; D13; E22; O44; P10; P12; P18; Q01; Z13. Lizenz / Licence: Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0. creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2 Richters / Siemoneit: The contested concept of growth imperatives: Technology and the fear of stagnation 1 Introduction (1) A ‘drive’ (or ‘motive’) from left to right that ranges from free will over socio-cultural and economic influences Economic growth has become a prominent political goal to direct coercion (force). We have named five points along worldwide (Schmelzer, 2015, pp. 262–70). Critics question this dimension which has three aspects that are further ex- the ability of growing economies to stay within “planetary plained in figure 2: (a) Coerciveness increases from zero boundaries” (Bergh and Kallis, 2012; Steffen et al., 2015), or on the left to full scale on the right. (b) The points differ in they argue that growth should be replaced by new objectives their external influence: Free will and conformity are based because it has ceased to improve social conditions in indus- mainly on individual mental attitudes, deliberately chosen trialized countries (Kubiszewski et al., 2013; Stiglitz et al., or culturally acquired. Direct coercion as maximum external 2010; Wilkinson and Pickett, 2009). Even proponents of influence is hypothetical in our context, as no individually growth suspect that it may become obsolete because of “sec- enforced ‘growth law’ has been observed (though national ular stagnation” (Blanchard et al., 2016; Teulings and Bald- laws may require regulators not to impede economic growth, win, 2014). These concerns raise the question of whether such as the UK ‘growth duty’, UK Public General Acts, non-growing economies can be stabilized, or: “Why is there 2015). In between, we find ‘social’ as a mode of interaction so much of a political need for growth?” (Rajan, 2016, (cf. section 2.2), and we distinguish between social pressures p. 270). Discussions about this alleged need for growth de- and social coercions, the difference being existential threat. liver answers between free will and coercive laws, with very We will argue that a social coercion must be existential to different reasonings (cf. section 2). be ‘truly’ coercive, therefore the focus of the article is on This article investigates whether growth imperatives exist, the dotted frame. (c) We will show a general tendency for i. e., system immanent mechanisms that require economic ‘coercive’ arguments to be based on economic instead of growth and are hard to circumvent for individuals, firms, or socio-cultural pressures. Towards the right edge of our fig- nation states. In section 2, we structure the debate on growth ures, the economic mode of pressure gains in importance (cf. imperatives in a matrix with two dimensions, coerciveness section 4.1). and type of agent, thereby identifying two questions: (2) The second dimension is a ‘scope’ from bottom to (i) What makes economic growth ‘imperative’ (coercive)? top that considers how three different classes of agents are We regard growth imperatives as a special case of social affected by growth imperatives: firms and households at the coercion. For both terms, formal definitions are delivered micro level, and public decision-makers at the macro level. in section 2 that are currently missing. This will lead us to We will argue that genuine (economic) growth imperatives focusing on economic conditions rather than considering (“causes”) can only be found at the micro level of firms and socio-cultural influences. households, even though it translates into a political growth (ii) Which agents are subject to this coercion according imperative (“symptoms”) via an agent-policy link. to which mechanisms, and is the concept of a growth im- Figure 3 visualizes these questions and the content of the perative likewise applicable at the micro and macro level? article sections. Section 3 scrutinizes theories of growth imperatives for firms and describes how technological progress requires steady 2.2 Social Pressure and Social Coercion increases in efficiency and therefore net investment. The availability of natural resources plays a key role in fueling Coercion is usually discussed as a relation between two indi- an economic arms race. In section 4, we will show how vidual agents, coercer and coercee (cf. Anderson, 2015). The technical consumption goods that make private life more ef- coercer can be ‘society’, when individuals are “compelled ficient become existential necessities for households. This is [...] by situational circumstances, that is by the structure of crucial for closing a positive feedback loop between supply society and not by individuals” (Abercrombie et al., 1984, and demand. We will explain in section 5 how the growth p. 45) or “placed under enormous social pressures” (Sulli- imperatives of the economic agents proper translate into a van, 2009, p. 81). However, there is no shared definition political growth imperative for governments, because cer- of ‘social coercion’ or ‘societal coercion’. Both terms ap- tain collective convictions and political restrictions make pear with a wide range of meanings in the literature, from alternatives to fostering economic growth ‘unrealistic’. We internalized social norms (role expectations and ‘duties’, de- discuss institutional remedies for addressing this dilemma. cency, bad conscience, e. g., Yllo, 1990), social approval and Section 6 concludes. disapproval (peer pressure, public opinion, e. g., McDermott, 2017) to institutionalized force (laws, military service, com- pulsory education, referral to psychiatry, e. g., Anckarsäter, 2 Structuring the Debate 2010). To make social coercion a meaningful analytical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 46 Post-Growth Economics
    46 POST-GROWTH ECONOMICS Niko Paech Introduction Today’s sustainability concepts are mostly based on ecological modernisation. Modern societies follow this trend and tend to shift the necessity of changing their consumption habits to a point later in time, or even deny the necessity of change completely. This is based on the hope that technological progress can solve the sustainability problem without having to go through difficult changes in lifestyle and a moderation of consumption habits. However, many of those ‘Green’ innovations intensify material and energy overexploitation by making use of previously unspoilt landscapes and untouched resources. As long as decoupling by technological means turns out to be impossible, sustainable development can only be understood as a programme for economic reduction rather than conjuring Green Growth solutions. In this chapter I will explore an alternative to this popularised approach. That is a world that no longer clings to the growth imperative and makes the post-growth economy its goal. I start by defining what is meant by post-growth economics and how it has developed. This is followed by an exploration of the case for limits to growth and why decoupling runs into problems, including the rebound effect. I then outline some key aspects of a post-growth economy, before briefly identifying future directions and finishing with some concluding remarks. The development and meaning of post-growth economics Development of post-growth economics The terms post-growth economics (as an analytical framework) and post-growth economies (as a concrete draft for the future) arose in debates over sustainability held at Carl von Ossietzky University in Oldenburg during 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Publikationsliste Von Niko Paech
    apl. Prof. Dr. Niko Paech Publikationsliste Monographien Die Wirkung potentieller Konkurrenz auf das Preissetzungsverhalten etablierter Firmen bei Ab- wesenheit strategischer Asymmetrien, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1995 (Dissertation). Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften jenseits von Innovationsorientierung und Wachstum { Eine unter- nehmensbezogene Transformationstheorie, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 1. Auflage 2005, 2. Auf- lage, 2012 (Habilitationsschrift). Befreiung vom Uberfluss.¨ Auf dem Weg in die Postwachstums¨okonomie, oekom verlag, Munchen,¨ 1. Auflage 2012, 8. Auflage, 2015. Liberation from Excess. The Road to a Post-Growth Economy, oekom verlag, Munich, 2012. Namudosi Publishing Co., Seoul, 2015. Was Sie da vorhaben, w¨are ja eine Revolution..., oekom verlag, Munchen,¨ 2016 (mit Erhard Eppler und Christiane Grefe). Se Lib´erer Du Superflu. Vers une ´economie de post-croissance, Rue de L'´echiquier, Paris, 2016. Energie, Entropie, Kreativit¨at { Was das Wachstum treibt und bremst, Springer Spektrum, Berlin, 2018 (mit R. Kummel¨ und D. Lindenberger). Okonomie¨ der Genugsamkeit.¨ Impulse fur¨ eine Gesellschaft ohne Wachstum, Herrenalber Fo- rum, Karlsruhe 2019 (mit C. Rauch und A. U. Engelmann). All you need is less. Eine Kultur des Genug aus ¨okonomischer und buddhistischer Sicht, oekom verlag, Munchen,¨ 2020 (mit M. Folkers). Herausgeberschaften Perspektiven einer kulturwissenschaftlichen Theorie der Unternehmung, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 2004 (mit Forschungsgruppe Unternehmen und gesellschaftltiche Organisationen { FUGO). Nachhaltige Zukunftsm¨arkte. Orientierungen fur¨ unternehmerische Innovationsprozesse im 21. Jahrhundert, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 2005 (mit K. Fichter und R. Pfriem). Innovationen fur¨ eine nachhaltige Entwicklung, Deutscher Universit¨ats-Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2006 (mit R. Pfriem, R. Antes, K. Fichter, M. Muller,¨ S. Seuring und B. Siebenhuner).¨ Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, Buchreihe im Metropolis-Verlag, Mar- burg, von der seit 2007 acht B¨ande erschienen sind (Mitgliedschaft im Herausgebergremium und Lektorat).
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Ch F-X ang PD e w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu-trac Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany Program: Sustainability Economics and Management Master of Arts Master Thesis Titel: Diffusion of Sustainability Innovations around Lynedoch EcoVillage by: Claudia Stüwe for: PD Dr. Niko Paech PD Dr. Klaus Fichter Oldenburg, Germany, 04.11.2009 Ch F-X ang PD e w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu-trac Table of Contents Page Abstract ............................................................................................................... 4 Table of Figures ................................................................................................... 4 List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 5 Section 1 .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Ecosystem degradation, climate change and increasing inequalities ............ 7 1.2 Sustainability and ‘transferable life styles’ .................................................. 9 1.3 Giving sustainability a different direction: Lynedoch EcoVillage, South Africa ............................................................................................................. 10 2. Research Design ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Media Review: Three Books on a New Economics: a German Perspective Ulrike Brandhorst
    Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies Volume 4 Article 11 Issue 1 Winter, Caring Democracy 3-2-2017 Media Review: Three Books on a New Economics: A German Perspective Ulrike Brandhorst Follow this and additional works at: http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps Recommended Citation Brandhorst, Ulrike (2017) "Media Review: Three Books on a New Economics: A German Perspective," Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 11. Available at: http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps/vol4/iss1/11 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License The Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Authors retain ownership of their articles, which are made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial license (CC BY-NC 4.0). Brandhorst: Media Review: Three Books on a New Economics MEDIA REVIEW Three Books on a New Economics: A German Perspective LIBERATION FROM EXCESS: THE ROAD TO A POST-GROWTH ECONOMY, Niko Paech (2012) CHANGE EVERYTHING: CREATING AN ECONOMY FOR THE COMMON GOOD, Christian Felber (2015) THE REAL WEALTH OF NATIONS: CREATING A CARING ECONOMICS, Riane Eisler (2008) Reviewed by Ulrike Brandhorst Abstract The first part of this paper presents the ideas of Niko Paech and Christian Felber, two popular exponents of alternative economic models in Germany and Austria. Both authors invoke psychological and behavioral factors, noting that our current economic system is leaving people dependent, unhappy, and dissatisfied, and that this system’s values are contradictory to our constitutional and fundamental values. The book presented in the second part of the paper helps understand this absurdity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear of Stagnation? a Review on Growth Imperatives
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas Working Paper Fear of stagnation? A review on growth imperatives VÖÖ Discussion Paper, No. 6/2017 Provided in Cooperation with: Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ), Heidelberg Suggested Citation: Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2017) : Fear of stagnation? A review on growth imperatives, VÖÖ Discussion Paper, No. 6/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie (VÖÖ), Heidelberg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/158012 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth Imperative: HOW SLOW GROWTH THREATENS OUR FUTURE and the AMERICAN DREAM
    The Growth Imperative: HOW SLOW GROWTH THREATENS OUR FUTURE AND THE AMERICAN DREAM Analysis by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Ph.D. President, American Action Forum The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation (USCCF) is a 501 (c)(3) nonpro!t af!liate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce dedicated to strengthening America’s long-term competitiveness by addressing developments that affect our nation, our economy, and the global business environment. THE CASE FOR GROWTH The Honorable John R. McKernan Jr. President, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation hese are challenging times in America. With slow job creation and soaring debt, Americans now look Tto the future with worry rather than with hope. The American economy, which was once the most expansive, innovative, and inclusive in the world, is no longer keeping pace with the needs and dreams of the nation’s workers and families. Our lagging economic growth is a threat to the American Dream and to sustainable government !nances. In a recent report, the Congressional Budget Of!ce (CBO) forecast annual growth of under 2.5% through 2024. That is signi!cantly lower than the 40-year historical average of more than 3% a year. CBO is not alone in offering that subpar forecast. Other leading economic experts, on both sides of the political aisle, have forecast mediocre growth in the years to come. The result of this combination of our existing !scal realities and these sobering estimates are twofold: (1) depressed opportunity and job creation for America’s middle class, (2) and a federal government that registers immense annual de!cits as far as the eye can see.
    [Show full text]
  • Consistency and Stability Analysis of Models of a Monetary Growth Imperative
    Ecological Economics 136 (2017) 114–125 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon Analysis Consistency and stability analysis of models of a monetary growth imperative Oliver Richtersa,*, Andreas Siemoneit b aInternational Economics, Department of Economics, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114–118, Oldenburg (Oldb) 26129, Germany bSchlesische Straße 32, Berlin 10997, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Is fostering economic growth ‘only’ a question of political will or ‘unavoidable’ to maintain economic sta- Received 3 March 2016 bility? It is disputed whether such a ‘growth imperative’ is located within the current monetary system, Received in revised form 22 January 2017 creating conflicts with sustainability. To examine the claim that compound interest compels economies to Accepted 24 January 2017 grow, we present five post-Keynesian models and show how to perform a stability analysis in the parameter Available online 21 February 2017 space. A stationary state with zero net saving and investment can be reached with positive interest rates, if the parameter ‘consumption out of wealth’ is above a threshold that rises with the interest rate. The other JEL classification: claim that retained profits from the interest revenues of banks create an imperative is based on circuitist Q01 Sustainable Development models that we consider refutable. Their accounting is inconsistent, and a modeling assumption central for O44 Environment and growth a growth imperative is not underpinned theoretically: Bank’s equity capital has to increase even if debt does E12 Keynes–Keynesian–Post-Keynesian E43 Interest rates: determination not. This is a discrepancy between the authors’ intentions in their texts and their actual models.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Analysis of the Properties of Post-Keynesian Endogenous Money Systems
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Article Computational Analysis of the Properties of Post-Keynesian Endogenous Money Systems Stef Kuypers 1,* , Thomas Goorden 1 and Bruno Delepierre 1,2 1 Happonomy VZW, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] (T.G.); [email protected] (B.D.) 2 Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The debate about whether or not a growth imperative exists in debt-based, interest-bearing monetary systems has not yet been settled. It is the goal of this paper to introduce a new perspective in this discussion. For that purpose, an SFC computational model is constructed that simulates a post- Keynesian endogenous money system without including economic parameters such as production, wages, consumption and savings. The case is made that isolating the monetary system allows for better analysis of the inherent properties of such a system. Loan demands, which are assumed to happen, are the driving force of the model. Simulations can be run in two modes, each based on a different assumption. Either the growth rate of the money stock is assumed to be constant or the loan ratio, expressed as a percentage of the money stock, is assumed to be constant. Simulations with varying parameters were run in order to determine the conditions under which the model converges to stability, which is defined as converging to a bounded debt ratio. The analysis showed that the stability of the model is dependent on net bank profit ratios, expressed relative to their debt assets, Citation: Kuypers, Stef, Thomas remaining below the growth rate of the money stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth Between Stagnation and Obsession Why Ask? Questions and Approach Why Growth? Key Arguments on the (Re)Making of the Growth Paradigm 1
    Why bother? Economic growth between stagnation and obsession Why ask? Questions and approach Why growth? Key arguments on the (re)making of the growth paradigm 1. The four discourses of the growth paradigm 2. The flexibility of the growth paradigm 3. GDP as the measure 4. Growth as a universal solution 5. The entangled rise of economics and the growth paradigm So what? Some tentative conclusions Nominal (left) and real (right) GDP % change on year earlier in key OECD countries, 1960-2014 Source: Penn World Tables; The Economist Nominal (left) and real (right) GDP % change on year earlier in key OECD countries, 1960-2014 “Modern macroeconomics often seems to treat rapid and stable economic growth as the be-all and end-all of policy. That message is echoed in political debates, central-bank boardrooms and front-page headlines […] There is a certain absurdity to the obsession with maximizing long-term average income growth in perpetuity, to the neglect of other risks and considerations.” Kenneth Rogoff, “Rethinking the Growth Imperative,” Project Syndicate, 2012, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/rethinking-the-growth-imperative Source: Penn World Tables; The Economist The rise of “economic growth” in public discourse Source: Ngram Viewer The rise of “economic growth” as a scientific concept articles discipline by Percentage of articles containing ‘economic growth’ inallJStor ‘economic growth’ of articles containing Percentage Source: Data For Research (DFR) The growth idea in perspective Economic growth has been described as: ‣ fetish (McNeill 2000) ‣ obsession (Eichengreen 2007, van der Wee 1995) ‣ ideology (Milward 1987, Maier 2010) ‣ axiomatic necessity (Georgescu-Roegen 1977) ‣ social imaginary (Castoriadis 1991, Latouche 2010) The “overarching priority of economic growth was easily the most important idea of the twentieth century” (McNeill 2000, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Theory Through the Lens of Development Economics
    Growth Theory Through the Lens of Development Economics Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo ∗ March 2004 1 Introduction: Neo-classical Growth Theory The premise of neo-classical growth theory is that it is possible to do a reasonable job of explaining the broad patterns of economic change across countries, by looking at it through the lens of an aggregate production function. The aggregate production function relates the total output of an economy (a country, for example) to the aggregate amounts of labor, human capital and physical capital in the economy, and some simple measure of the level of technology in the economy as a whole. It is formally represented as (A, KP KH , L) where KP and KH are the total amounts of physical and human capital invested, L is F the total labor endowment of the economy and A is a technology parameter. The aggregate production function is not meant to be something that physically exists. Rather, it is a convenient construct. Growth theorists, like everyone else, have in mind a world where production functions are associated with people. To see how they proceed, let us start with a model where everyone has the option of starting a firm, and when they do, they have access to an individual production function Y = F (KP ,KH ,L,θ), (1) where KP and KH are the amounts of physical and human capital invested in the firm and L is the amount of labor. θ is a productivity parameter which may vary over time, but at any point of time is a characteristic of the firm’s owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing and the Ceo's Growth Imperative
    MARKETING AND THE CEO’S GROWTH IMPERATIVE by George S. Day Corporate leaders are being squeezed between the pressure by equity markets, for sustained growth in earnings, and shrinking opportunities for growth in their saturated and hotly contested markets. This squeeze is being worsened by the recent stock market plunge which has ruled out growth by stock swap acquisitions and precluded accounting manipulations that artificially grow earnings. This puts organic growth close to the top of the personal agendas of most Chief Executive Officers. Will CEO’s get much help from marketing in resolving their organic growth dilemma? The growth gurus, including Clay Christensen, Richard Foster, Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad, are dismissive. In their view marketing is too close to the immediate demands and requirements of current customers and competitors to be a source of breakthrough sources of growth. At the same time new organizational forms are subordinating marketing’s traditional functional role in the innovation process. My intention is first to challenge this restrictive view, because it is not in the organization’s best interest to have marketing performing below potential, and then show how good marketing practice can enhance fast-paced growth through discontinuous innovation. WHY IS IT IMPERATIVE TO GROW? The growth imperative is shaped by the four forces in Figure One. They impinge on top management by imposing constraints and requiring challenging objectives. At the 1 top is the intense focus on shareholder value creation. Bonuses and option awards are increasingly linked to this metric, and the market clearly rewards companies that deliver profitable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficiency Consumption
    An offer you can’t refuse – Enhancing personal productivity through ‘efficiency consumption’ Andreas Siemoneit ZOE Discussion Papers | No. 2 | January 2019 ZOE Discussion Papers No. 2 · January 2019 An offer you can’t refuse: Enhancing personal productivity through ‘efficiency consumption’ Andreas Siemoneit ZOE. Institut für zukunftsfähige Ökonomien. www.effizienzkritik.de Abstract: Worldwide, economic growth is a prominent political goal, despite its severe conflicts with ecological sustainability. Contributing to the debate on economic ‘growth imperatives’, this article explores the thesis that firms and consumers both frequently acquire goods that increase their efficiency (productivity). For firms, efficiency is accepted as a main investment motive, but for consumers it is usually framed as convenience, ease, or comfort. Via social diffusion processes consumption goods that can save time and costs are transformed from a welcome expansion of possibilities into a social imperative whose noncompliance over time also has economic drawbacks. Positive feedback mechanisms not only lead to an acceleration of private life but favor ever more efficient industry and trade structures on the supply side, contributing to a redistribution of incomes and revenues. Eventually a comprehensive consumption pattern leads to a new ‘normality’ and makes the renunciation of consumption goods like cars, computers or smartphones literally impossible. Both microeconomics and consumption sociology usually assume fundamental differences of motivations, goals and structural overall conditions for firms and consumers. Some reasons for this scholarly asymmetry are discussed and a more symmetrical consumption model is proposed. As a political dimension the increasing resource use of this quest for efficiency is addressed. Keywords: Efficiency; Diffusion of Innovations; Growth Imperative; Feedback loops; Theory of Consumption Licence: Creative-Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
    [Show full text]