DOCSLIB.ORG

Summer Range Ecology of Rattlesnake Creek Mule Deer in the Spruce-Fir Onez

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summer Range Ecology of Rattlesnake Creek Mule Deer in the Spruce-Fir Onez University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1958 Summer range ecology of Rattlesnake Creek mule deer in the spruce-fir onez Keith Lynde White The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation White, Keith Lynde, "Summer range ecology of Rattlesnake Creek mule deer in the spruce-fir zone" (1958). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6420. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6420 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUMMER RANGE ECOLOGY OF RATTLESNAKE CREEK MULE DEER IN THE SPRUCE - FIR ZONE by KEITH L. WHITE B.S., University of Wisconsin, 1950 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Montana State University 1958 Approved: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School DEC 1 9 1958 Date UMI Number: EP37221 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OMSortation PùWiahmg UMI EP37221 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuesf ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to acknowledge my gratitude to Dr. Richard D. Taber, under whose direction this study was made;, for his advice, stimulating suggestions, field assistance and guidance throughout the study, and for his critical reading of the thesis. I wish to express my appreciation to Dr. John J. Craighead and the Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit for having made this study possible. For technical assistance and advice I wish to thank the following: Mr, Don D. Baldwin, Mr, Robert F, Cooney, Dr. Gene S. Cox, Dr. John J. Craighead, Mr. Fred L. Hartkorn, Dr. Barbara J . Howell, Dr. Richard E. Juday, Prof. Melvin S. Morris, Dr. Howard E. Reinhardt, and Mr. Merle J. Rognrud. The Montana Power Company permitted use of i^s cabin in Lake Creek Canyon and entry into the area throughout the study. Personnel of the National Bison Range permitted experimentation on ^eer with the nicotine-salicylate dart gun. Permission to read Mr. Robert Ferguson*s M.S. thesis on the pellet count method in Utah was appreciated. I am indebted to Mr. Kenneth Greer, Director of the Montana Fish and Game Food Habits Laboratory, for the time consuming yet thorough analysis of the rumen samples used in this study. -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1 Objectives, 1 Scope, 1 II o STUDY A R E A ........................................... 3 Location, 3 Land ownership, 3 Geology, 6 Topography, 6 Soils, 6 Climate, 7 Vegetation, 0 III. HISTORY OF GAME HARVEST AND LAND U S E ................. 12 Game hajrvest and land use by Indians, 13 Early game harvest and land use by Whites, 14 Recent game harvest and land use by Whites, 16 IV. METHODS............................................. 20 Records Field notes, 20 Phenology, 20 -iii- IV* METHODS (Continued)............... 20 Sample plots, 20 Range studies Botanical composition, 22 Herbarium, 23 Fecal-pellet count, 23 Browse production, 25 Forage quality, 25 Food habits, %5 Deer studies Deer observations, 26 Deer marking, 26 Deer Oonditlon, 2Ô 7. RESULTS OF RANOB STUDIES............................. 30 Botanical composition, 30 Range use, 35 Food habits, 39 Browse production and utilization, 47 Forage quality, ^9 Range condition, 51 VI* RESULTS OF DEER STUDIES............................. 53 Phenology, 53 Population size Observations, 53 Fecal-pellet count, 55 Schnabel method, 57 —iv— vio RESULTS OF DEER STUDIES (Continued)................. 53 Home range, 6l Productivity, 63 Condition, 64 Predators and predation, 6? Elk-deer relations, 6? VII. DISCUSSION........................................ 69 Methods Deer marking, 69 Sample plots, 70 Deer census, 70 Deer Numbers Historical, 71 Recent, 71 Deer Ecology Movements, 72 Food habits, 72 PrédationI 72 VIII. SUMMARY.................. 74 IX. Ï.ITERATÜRE CI T E D ................................. 77 X. APPENDIX .................. 82 -V* LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE I. study Area Cllmatological Data ........... 7 II. Increment Borings, High Falls Creek Study Area . 10 III. Flathead Indian Tribe Population Estimates ..... 13 17. Rattlesnake Creek Hunter Checking Station Data . 19 V. Character of Fecal-Pellet Groups and Position in Plot 24 VI. Frequency of Occurrence and Average Coverage of Study Area Plant Species ................ 31 VII. Topographic Characteristics of Study Area Vegetation iÿp«» ......................................... 33 VIII. Plan^ Speoles (With a Fraquency of 10$ or More) In Rank Order for Seven Study Area Vegetation Types . 34 IX. Range Use Indicated by Feoal-Pellet Distribution • . 37 X. Comparison of Temperatures in the Xeronhvllum/ Vaocinlum and Xaronhvllum/ Menziesia Vegetation %rpes 38 XI. Relative Rating of Observed Range Use of Vegetation ü ^ e s ..................................... .. 39 XII. Food Habits of Deer and Elk on the Study Area. .... 40 XIII. Collection Data for the Nine Rumen Samples Analyzed. 42 XIV. Ratio of Shrubs to Herbs in Nine Summer Range Rumen Samples. .................. 46 XV. Browse Production by Menziesia glabella and Vaccinium membranaceum .................... 48 XVI. Chemical Analysis of Forage Plants 50 XVII. Breeding and Fawning Dates Determined from Ages of Ten Fetuses. ...................... 54 -vi— TABLE PAGE XVIII. Comparison of 1957 and 1958 Pellet-Group Counts , . • • 56 XIX. Comparison of 1957 and 1958 Paired Pellet-Group Counts. 57 XX. Estimates of Study Area Deer Population Size by Three Different Methods .......... ............ 58 XXI. Deer Population Size (P) Estimated by Schnabel Method 1957 59 XXII. Deer Population Size (P) Estimated by Schnabel Method . 1958 60 XXIII. Size of Home Range in Mule Deer .................... 61 XXIV. Fetus Counts for Eleven Mule Deer Does Collected in the Rattlesnake Creek Drainage ....................... 63 XXV. Kidney-Fat Indices for Forty^nine Rattlesnake Creek Mule D e e r ............................................ 65 XXVI. Soil Analysis D a t a ........................... • • • 83 XXVII. Deer and Elk Population Estimates for the Missoula Ranger District • ............ 85 XXVIII. Days and Hours of Rattlesnake Creek Hunter Checking Station Operation.................................. *86 XXIX. Deer Hunting Regulations for the Area Including Rattle­ snake Creek, 1945-1958 87 XXX. Xerophyllum/ Vaccinium Vegetation Type Botanical Data • 88 XXXI. Xerophyllum/ Menziesia Vegetation Type Botanical Data , 90 XXXII. Xerophyllum/ Phyllodoee Vegetation type Botanical Data, 91 XXXIII. Xerophyllum/ Chrysopsis Vegetation Type Botanical Data, 92 XXXIV. Senecio/ Veratrum Vegetation Type Botanical Data . 93 XXXV. Carex/ Penstemon Vegetation Type Botanical Data . • • • 94 XXXVI. Phyllodoee/ Abies Vegetation Type Botanical Data . 95 -vii- LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1# U.S. Forest Service Map of Rattlesnake Creek Drainage .• 4 2. Map of High Falls Creek Study Ar e a .................. 5 3. View bf Study Area from South of Cliff L a k e ......... 11 U* Alpine Fir and En^elmann's Spruce on a Level Bench Beside Moose Lake . .............................. 11 5t Location of Sample Plot L i n e s ..................... 21 6. Botanical Composition Sample Plot Frame.............. 29 7. Deer No. 1917 from the July Deer C o l l e c t i o n ........ 29 S. Map of Study Area Vegetation Type Distribution...... 36 9. Heavy Browsing on Bush Type Menziesia................45 10. Dates and Locations of Doe A^ Doe G* and Buck A Observations ................. .62 11. Seasonal Level of Rattlesnake Creek Mule Deer Éidney-Fat I n d i c e s ................................... '•••.66 -viii- INTRODUCTION There is need for more basic knowledge of the ecological re­ lationships of mule deer to their range in western Montana. Because of this, intensive study of the Rattlesnake Creek mule deer herd was initiated in 1957. The Rattlesnake drainage was not Considered a problem area but rather an average range readily accessible from the University campus. This study was concerned with the summer range ecology of the Rocky Mountain mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) on a 400 acre study area in the Spruee-Fir zone. Objectives. Study objectives were to: 1. Describe the study area Spruee-Fir plant association to permit accurate comparison of Rattlesnake Creek deer ecology with that in other areas* Assess range use by deer in relation to the plant unions within the Spruee-Fir zone. 3* Assemble a phenological record for Rattlesnake Creek mule deer. 4 . Determine study area deer density and home range size. 5 . Describe deer food habits in relation to available forage. 6. Determine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Appendix C Botanical Resources Table of Contents Purpose Of This Appendix ............................................................................................................. Below Tables C-1. Federal and State Status, Current and Proposed Forest Service Status, and Global Distribution of the TEPCS Plant Species on the Sawtooth National Forest ........................... C-1 C-2. Habit, Lifeform, Population Trend, and Habitat Grouping of the TEPCS Plant Species for the Sawtooth National Forest ............................................................................... C-3 C-3. Rare Communities, Federal and State Status, Rarity Class, Threats, Trends, and Research Natural Area Distribution for the Sawtooth National Forest ................................... C-5 C-4. Plant Species of Cultural Importance for the Sawtooth National Forest ................................... C-6 PURPOSE OF THIS APPENDIX This appendix is designed to provide detailed information about habitat, lifeform, status, distribution, and habitat grouping for the Threatened, Proposed, Candidate, and Sensitive (current and proposed) plant species found on the Sawtooth National Forest. The detailed information is provided to enable managers to more efficiently direct the implementation of Botanical Resources goals, objectives, standards, and guidelines. Additionally, this appendix provides detailed information about the rare plant communities located on the Sawtooth National Forest and should provide additional support of Forest-wide objectives. Species of cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Explain Kotar Classification
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Implementation of a Long-term Vegetation Monitoring Program at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GLKN/NRTR—2010/405 ON THE COVER Clockwise from top left: recording the groundlayer in 1m2 quadrat; measuring tree DBH; beech bark disease. Photographs by: GLKN vegetation monitoring field crew Implementation of a Long-term Vegetation Monitoring Program at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GLKN/NRTR—2010/405 Suzanne Sanders and Jessica Grochowski National Park Service Great Lakes Inventory & Monitoring Network 2800 Lake Shore Dr. East Ashland, WI 54806 FortNovember Collins, 2010 Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaylussacia Vaccinium
    Contents Table des matières The Canadian Botanical The first Recipient of the 2005 Undergraduate Botanical Association Bulletin Presentation Regional Award / Première remise d’un prix régional pour la meilleure communication étudiante de premier cycle page 13 Bulletin de l’Association Editor’s Message / Message du rédacteur page 14 botanique du Canada May/ Mai 200 5 • Volume 38 No. / No 2 The first Recipient of the 2005 Undergraduate Botanical PhD Opportunities page 14 Presentation Regional Award Jessie Carviel, student at McMaster University, received this CBA award for the best student paper presented at the 2005 Biology Day in Sudbury, ON, Canada. Paper / Article Miss Carviel is representing the Ontario Region for this contest. The Undergraduate Botanical Presentation Award was created in 2003 by the CBA to encourage undergraduate students to pursue graduate research in botany and to enhance the visibility of the Association. The program offers annually one award of $200.00 for one of the undergraduate conferences/meetings in Biology for each of the five (5) regions of Canada: Atlantic region, Qué bec, Ontario, Prairies and Territories, and British Columbia. Première remise d’un prix ré gional pour la meilleure Poorly Known Economic communicationé tudiante de premier cycle Plants of Canada - 45. Eastern huckleberries Jessie Carviel, étudiante à l’université McMaster, a reçu ce prix de l’ABC pour (Gaylussacia spp.) une présentation faite lors de la Journée de biologie 2005 qui s’est déroulée à and western huckleberries Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. (Vaccinium spp.). E. Small and P.M. Catling Le prix de la meilleure communication étudiante de premier cycle a été créé en pages 15-23 2003 par l’ABC pour inciter les étudiant(e)s à poursuivre leurs études en botanique et pour améliorer la visibilité de l'Association.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Vaccinium in North America
    Agriculture Canada The Genus Vaccinium 630 . 4 C212 P 1828 North America 1988 c.2 Agriculture aid Agri-Food Canada/ ^ Agnculturo ^^In^iikQ Canada V ^njaian Agriculture Library Brbliotheque Canadienno de taricakun otur #<4*4 /EWHE D* V /^ AgricultureandAgri-FoodCanada/ '%' Agrrtur^'AgrntataireCanada ^M'an *> Agriculture Library v^^pttawa, Ontano K1A 0C5 ^- ^^f ^ ^OlfWNE D£ W| The Genus Vaccinium in North America S.P.VanderKloet Biology Department Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1828 1988 'Minister of Suppl) andS Canada ivhh .\\ ailabla in Canada through Authorized Hook nta ami other books! or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A0S9 Catalogue No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data VanderKloet,S. P. The genus Vaccinium in North America (Publication / Research Branch, Agriculture Canada; 1828) Bibliography: Cat. No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 I. Vaccinium — North America. 2. Vaccinium — North America — Classification. I. Title. II. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. III. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1828. QK495.E68V3 1988 583'.62 C88-099206-9 Cover illustration Vaccinium oualifolium Smith; watercolor by Lesley R. Bohm. Contract Editor Molly Wolf Staff Editors Sharon Rudnitski Frances Smith ForC.M.Rae Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada http://www.archive.org/details/genusvacciniuminOOvand
    [Show full text]
  • Compounds of Vaccinium Membranaceum and Vaccinium Ovatum Native to the Pacific Northwest of North America
    J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7039−7044 7039 Comparison of Anthocyanin Pigment and Other Phenolic Compounds of Vaccinium membranaceum and Vaccinium ovatum Native to the Pacific Northwest of North America JUNGMIN LEE,† CHAD E. FINN,§ AND RONALD E. WROLSTAD*,† Department of Food Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, and Northwest Center for Small Fruit Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Avenue, Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Two huckleberry species, Vaccinium membranaceum and Vaccinium ovatum, native to Pacific Northwestern North America, were evaluated for their total, and individual, anthocyanin and polyphenolic compositions. Vaccinium ovatum had greater total anthocyanin (ACY), total phenolics (TP), oxygen radical absorbing capacity (ORAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) than did V. membranaceum. The pH and °Brix were also higher in V. ovatum. Berry extracts from each species were separated into three different fractionssanthocyanin, polyphenolic, and sugar/ acidsby solid-phase extraction. The anthocyanin fractions of each species had the highest amount of ACY, TP, and antioxidant activity. Each species contained 15 anthocyanins (galactoside, glucoside, and arabinoside of delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, and malvidin) but in different proportions. Their anthocyanin profiles were similar by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-DAD) and high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array and mass spectrometry detections (LC-DAD-MS). Each species had a different polyphenolic profile. The polyphenolics of both species were mainly composed of cinnamic acid derivatives and flavonol glycosides. The major polyphenolic compound in V. membranaceum was neochlorogenic acid, and in V. ovatum, chlorogenic acid. KEYWORDS: Vaccinium; huckleberry; anthocyanins; phenolics; antioxidant activity INTRODUCTION to Vaccinium consanguineum Klotsch, native to Central America, and Vaccinium floribundum Kunth, native to Andean S.
    [Show full text]
  • Management & Monitoring Plan for the Enhancement of Big Huckleberry (Vaccinium Membranaceum) in Government Meadows
    Management & Monitoring Plan for the Enhancement of Big Huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum) in Government Meadows Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Cover photos courtesy of Warren KingGeorge, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Department of Anthropology Management & Monitoring Plan for Big Huckleberry ~ Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Laura Potash Martin, Joyce LeCompte-Mastenbrook, Warren KingGeorge, and Tracy Fuentes. 2008. Management & Monitoring Plan for the Enhancement of Big Huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum) in Government Meadows, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Snoqualmie Ranger District, North Bend, WA Available to the public on line at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/mbs/projects/ 0 Management & Monitoring Plan for Big Huckleberry ~ Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Origin, Introduction, and Setting ………………………………………………………..3 Species General Description …………………………………...…………………………………8 Ecological Characteristics of Big Huckleberry…………………………………………………..8 Habitat Types Supporting Big Huckleberry on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie……………………..9 Management of Big Huckleberry ………………………………..………………………………10 Huckleberry Monitoring Design…………………………………………………………………14 Data Analysis and Management Implications…………………………………………………20 Estimated Timeline………………………………………………………………………………20 Conclusions and Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………21 References Cited……………………………………………………………………………………………22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity map…………………………………………………………………………….5 Figure 2. Close-up of Huckleberry Enhancement
    [Show full text]
  • Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on NPS and U.S. FWS Lands
    Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands: Results of a June 24-25, 2003 Workshop Baltimore, Maryland National Park Service Air Resources Division U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Air Quality Branch November 2003 Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands: Results of a June 24-25, 2003 Workshop Baltimore, Maryland Prepared by: Ellen Porter, Air Resources Division, National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Air Resources Division, Denver, Colorado U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Air Quality Branch, Denver, Colorado November 2003 NPS D1522 Natural Resource Report NPS/NRARD/NRR-2003/01 Acknowledgements: Drs. Art Chappelka, Howie Neufeld, Donald Davis, Robert Kohut and Pat Temple provided scientific expertise at the Baltimore Workshop. Dr. Gretchen Smith, Jim Renfro, Dr. David Peterson, Ed Jepsen, Dr. John Skelly, and Dr. William Manning provided additional scientific expertise and peer review. The author wishes to thank Tonnie Maniero, Tamara Blett, and Kristi Morris for helpful editing comments. This report is available at: www2.nature.nps.gov/ard/pubs/index.htm Cover photos by Dr. Donald Davis Contents Summary..................................................................................................1 Background ..............................................................................................1 Workshop Goals and Results .....................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Run Creek and Bull Run RNA Was Not Thoroughly Collected, Described Or Studied at the Time This Species List Was First Developed
    Flora of the Bull Run Creek and Bull Run RNA was not thoroughly collected, described or studied at the time this species list was first developed. It is based on observations of Jan Bal of the University of Idaho and collections and observations of Charles Wellner. Mike Hays (at that time Palouse Ranger District Botanist) added those species marked with (h) 5/24/1995 and used it for an INPS White Pine chapter field trip. 6/4/1995; (c1) indicates plants collected and deposited in UI Herbarium by Wellner (and/or Bal). Trees Abies grandis Grand fir Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine Betula papyrifera Paper birch Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas-fir Larix occidentalis Western larch Taxus brevifolia (h) Pacific Yew Pinus monticola Western white pine Thuja plicata Western redcedar ********************************************* ********************************************* Shrubs and Subshrubs Acer glabrous Rocky Mountain maple Prunus virginiana (h) Common chokecherry Alnus incana Mountain alder Rhamnus purshiana (h) Cascara Alnus sinuate Sitka alder Ribes lacustre (h) Prickly current Amelanchier alnifolia Western Serviceberry Rosa sp Wild rose Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnickinnick/Bearberry Rosa gymnocarpa (h) Wild rose Berberis repens Creeping Oregongrape Rubus idaeus var. peramoenus Red raspberry Ceanothus sanguineus Redstem ceonathus Rubus leucodermis (h) Chrsothamnus nauseosus (c1) Common rabbit-brush Rubus nivalis (h) Snow bramble Cornus Canadensis Bunchberry Rubus parviflorus (c1) Thimbleberry Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood Rubus ursinus
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science
    Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science Vol. 54, 2003 INFLUENCE OF PREVIOUS CATTLE AND ELK GRAZING ON THE SUBSEQUENT QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF DIETS FOR CATTLE, DEER, AND ELK GRAZING LATE-SUMMER MIXED-CONIFER RANGELANDS D. Damiran1, T. DelCurto1, S. L. Findholt2, G. D. Pulsipher1, B. K. Johnson2 1Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, OSU, Union 97883; 2Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, La Grande 97850 ABSTRACT: A study was conducted to determine consequences on the following seasons forage resources. foraging efficiency of cattle, mule deer, and elk in response Coe et al. (2001) concluded competition for forage could to previous grazing by elk and cattle. Four enclosures, in occur between elk and cattle in late summer and species previously logged mixed conifer (Abies grandis) rangelands interactions may be stronger between elk and cattle than were chosen, and within each enclosure, three 0.75 ha deer and cattle. Furthermore, the response of elk and/or pastures were either: 1) ungrazed, 2) grazed by cattle, or 3) deer to cattle grazing may vary seasonally depending on grazed by elk in mid-June and mid-July to remove forage availability and quality (Peek and Krausman, 1996; approximately 40% of total forage yield. After grazing Wisdom and Thomas, 1996). In the fall, winter, and spring, treatments, each pasture was subdivided into three 0.25 ha elk preferred to forage where cattle had lightly or sub-pastures and 16 (4 animals and 4 bouts/animal) 20 min moderately grazed the preceding summer (Crane et al., grazing trials were conducted in each sub-pasture using four 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plant Propagation Protocol
    Vaccinium scoparium Leib. ex Coville - Plant Propagation Protocol ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production TAXONOMY Family Names Family Scientific Name: Ericaceae Family Common Name: Heath Family Scientific Names Genus: Vaccinium Species: scoparium Species Authority: Leib. ex Coville Variety: Sub-species: Cultivar: Authority for Variety/Sub-species: Common Synonym Genus: Species: Species Authority: Variety: Sub-species: Cultivar: Authority for Variety/Sub-species: Common Names: Grouse Whortleberry, grouse huckleberry, littleleaf huckleberry, whortleberry, red huckleberry Species Code (as per USDA Plants VASC database): GENERAL INFORMATION General Distribution: British Columbia to Northern California, Idaho to Alberta, South Dakota through the Rockies to Colorado, generally at higher elevations.i Climate and elevation range: Found in the Pacific Northwest from 700-2300 meters and in Colorado from 2600-3800 meters.ii Local habitat and abundance; may Growing on rocky subalpine to alpine woods and include commonly associated slopes, V. scoparium is found in acidic soils on moist species and dry sites, though more commonly on well drained sites and especially in association with lodgepole pine (P. contorta).iii Plant strategy type: Vaccinium are poor competitors, often struggling with perennial weeds. While common in fire adapted eastside ecosystems, burned plants can take 10-15 years to recover.iv PROPAGATION DETAILS Ecotype: Propagation Goal: Plants Propagation Method: Seed (note vegetative method available at http://www.nativeplantnetwork.org)v
    [Show full text]
  • Foods Eaten by the Rocky Mountain
    were reported as trace amounts were excluded. Factors such as relative plant abundance in relation to consumption were considered in assigning plants to use categories when such information was Foods Eaten by the available. An average ranking for each species was then determined on the basis Rocky Mountain Elk of all studies where it was found to contribute at least 1% of the diet. The following terminology is used throughout this report. Highly valuable plant-one avidly sought by elk and ROLAND C. KUFELD which made up a major part of the diet in food habits studies where encountered, or Highlight: Forty-eight food habits studies were combined to determine what plants which was consumed far in excess of its are normally eaten by Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis nelsoni), and the rela- vegetative composition. These had an tive value of these plants from a manager’s viewpoint based on the response elk have average ranking of 2.25 to 3.00. Valuable exhibited toward them. Plant species are classified as highly valuable, valuable, or least plants-one sought and readily eaten but valuable on the basis of their contribution to the diet in food habits studies where to a lesser extent than highly valuable they were recorded. A total of 159 forbs, 59 grasses, and 95 shrubs are listed as elk plants. Such plants made up a moderate forage and categorized according to relative value. part of the diet in food habits studies where encountered. Valuable plants had an average ranking of 1.50 to 2.24. Least Knowledge of the relative forage value elk food habits, and studies meeting the valuable plant-one eaten by elk but which of plants eaten by elk is basic to elk range following criteria were incorporated: (1) usually made up a minor part of the diet surveys, and to planning and evaluation Data must be original and derived from a in studies where encountered, or which of habitat improvement programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Frost Tolerance in Seedlings of Vaccinium Membranaceum
    Don Minole ano Alan W. Smart USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Pordand, Oregon 97208 FrostTolerance in Seedlingsof Vacciniummembranaceum, Vacciniumglobulare, and Vacciniumdeliciosum Abshact Frost tolerances ol Vaccinir.n, glab lare, V. d,eliciosam. antl V. membranace*m seedlings were compared at conrrolled temperarures of 0', -l', -6", and -9'C. Subsequent shoot etowth decreased with decredsingtempem(ure in ail species.bur growth trends ditfered. Seedine. ot V. del;cio *n were more frost tolerant than the others. I/. deliciotun seedliogs ai<o began spdng growth earlier when all three species were growo in the same environmeAt, Introduction Wild hucklelrrry fields occupy extensive areas in the mountains of Oregoo and \fash- ington. Many of these areas produce large quantities o{ high quality fruig and some are heavily utilized by berry pickers (Minore, 1972). Unfomrnately, huckleberry pro- duction is o{ten reduced by frost damage Similar crop reductions occur in tbe blueberry fields of eastern North America (Jobnson, 1951; Hall, Aalders, aod Barker, 1964). Sometimes most of the aurumn berry crotrr is desffoyed by spring frosts that occxr when the huckleberry trushes are actively growing, but a few huckleberry shrubs remain uninjured aod productive after severe frosts. Many of these shrubs escape damage be- cause they grow in protected locations or under local heavy snow accumulations w.herc active growth is delayed. Others seem to be frost resistant-field observations after the severe frosts of 1973 indicated drat some lorthwesterrl Vaccinium speoes are filore frost tolerant than orhers.As it is difficult to separatespecies differences from envir- onmental differences in the field, we compared the frost olerances of three common nofthwesteJn Vaccinium species under controlled conditions.
    [Show full text]