DOCSLIB.ORG

FY 2009 Annual Enforcement Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Railroad Fiscal Year Administration 2009 Enforcement Report Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has for the past 24 years compiled an Annual Civil Penalty Report that summarized the disposition of all cases about which FRA assessed a fine for violations of Federal railroad safety statutes, regulations and orders. By law, FRA is required to enter into negotiated settlements with railroads and other entities subject to its jurisdiction, in order to reach agreement on the collection of civil penalties imposed for failures to comply with specific requirements designed to promote and ensure the safety of the Nation’s freight and passenger railroad operations. This year, FRA is increasing the amount of information available about enforcement activities, and its accessibility to interested parties by posting it on FRA’s website (http://www.fra.dot.gov).1 This safety enforcement information will be available annually by December 31 for the preceding fiscal year (FY), October 1 through September 30. The following information is included in this year’s report: • Summary of all enforcement actions taken by FRA; • Enforcement actions sorted by type of alleged violation, railroad classification, hazardous materials shippers, and individuals; • Discussion of the relationship between inspections and enforcement actions, and the number and rate of reportable accidents and incidents, and railroad safety; • Analysis of locomotive engineer certification cases brought before FRA; • Administrative hearing cases involving hazardous materials (HAZMAT) violations or enforcement actions against individuals; and • Line-item listing of all civil penalty cases closed by FRA – Appendix A. 1 Consistent with Sections 303 and 307 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA), Public Law No. 110-432, Division A (122 Stat.4848), enacted October 16, 2008. These sections are codified at 49 U.S.C. 20120 and 103, note, respectively. 2 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS IN FY 2009 All Railroads and HAZMAT Shippers Number of Inspection Reports: 73,302 Defects: 283,111 Units: 3,575,008 Number of Observations: 306,269 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 4,565 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 10,044 Number of Inspection Days: 53,515 Railroads Only Number of Inspection Reports: 67,984 Defects: 270,189 Units: 3,453,609 Number of Observations: 283,048 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 3,822 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 8,679 Number of Inspection Days: 51,018 SUMMARY OF RAILROAD SAFETY VIOLATIONS BY REGULATORY OVERSIGHT DISCIPLINE Accident/Incident Reporting Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Accident Reports Regulations 447 All 447 Grade Crossing Signal System Safety Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Grade Crossing Signal Safety 354 All 354 3 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report Hazardous Materials Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Hazardous Materials Regulations 2,259 All 2,259 Motive Power and Equipment Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Freight Car Safety Standards 395 Locomotive Safety Standards 647 Passenger Equipment Safety Standards 144 Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness 23 Rear End Marking Devices 6 Safety Appliance Statutes and Regulations 1,780 Safety Glazing Standards 10 All 3,005 4 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report Railroad Operating Practices Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Alcohol and Drug Use 71 Engineer Qualifications 264 FRA Emergency Order No. 24/26 32 Hours of Service Laws and Regulations 1,079 Railroad Communications 69 Railroad Operating Practices 218 Railroad Operating Rules 352 Railroad Safety Enforcement Procedures 29 Train Horn/Quiet Zone 4 All 2,118 Signal System Safety Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Signal Inspection Regulations 245 All 245 Other Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations U.S. Code 4 All 4 5 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report Track Number of Violation Type Recommended Violations Roadway Worker Protection 123 Track Safety Standards 1,389 All 1,512 FRA INSPECTIONS BY RAILROAD TYPE Class I Number of Violation Reports: 50,735 Defects: 201,963 Units: 2,832,313 Number of Observations: 217,534 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 2,907 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 5,817 Number of Inspection Days: 39,123 Class II Number of Violation Reports: 5,487 Defects: 16,510 Units: 207,581 Number of Observations: 20,313 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 479 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 911 Number of Inspection days: 4,344 Class III Number of Violation Reports: 17,080 Defects: 64,638 Units: 535,114 Number of Observations: 68,422 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 1,179 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 3,316 Number of Inspection Days: 13,727 6 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS INDIVIDUAL CLASS I RAILROADS National Railroad Passenger Corporation Number of Violation Reports: 2,207 Defects: 3,429 Units: 45,251 Number of Observations: 9,192 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 132 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 381 Number of Inspection Days: 1,714 BNSF Railway Company Number of Violation Reports: 9,483 Defects: 36,458 Units: 495,410 Number of Observations: 39,605 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 576 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 1,166 Number of Inspection Days: 7,743 Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation Number of Violation Reports: 2,651 Defects: 10,176 Units: 147,339 Number of Observations: 10,619 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 217 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 477 Number of Inspection Days: 2,147 Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company Number of Violation Reports: 1,352 Defects: 5,726 Units: 88,507 Number of Observations: 5,641 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 114 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 160 Number of Inspection Days: 1,070 7 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report CSX Transportation, Inc. Number of Violation Reports: 11,659 Defects: 48,359 Units: 630,006 Number of Observations: 50,442 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 514 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 979 Number of Inspection Days: 9,519 The Kansas City Southern Railway Company Number of Violation Reports: 1,184 Defects: 6,071 Units: 64,522 Number of Observations: 5,209 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 69 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 133 Number of Inspection Days: 964 Norfolk Southern Railway Company Number of Violation Reports: 8,232 Defects: 33,943 Units: 596,153 Number of Observations: 36,391 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 338 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 745 Number of Inspection Days: 7,048 Union Pacific Railroad Company Number of Violation Reports: 13,967 Defects: 57,801 Units: 765,125 Number of Observations: 60,435 Number of Reports with a Recommended Violation: 947 Number of Recommended Violation Defects: 1,776 Number of Inspection Days: 10,935 During the past fiscal year FRA increased evening, night, and weekend safety inspections by approximately 25 percent. These inspections outside of normal shift (8am-4:30pm) reflect the 24-hour railroad operating environment and provide increased FRA presence during these hours. 8 Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2009 Enforcement Report ASSESSMENT AND SETTLEMENT SUMMARIES – FY 2009 Summary 1 Assessment and Settlement Summary 1 below reflects the actual number of civil penalties assessed, the initial amount of civil penalties assessed, the number of civil penalty cases settled, and the final amount of civil penalties assessed during Fiscal Year 2009. However, because in many cases a civil penalty is assessed during one fiscal year but settled and closed in the subsequent fiscal year, the assessment and settlement figures in Summary 1, while providing an indication of the enforcement work product during the year, do not correspond. The settlement figures in Summary 1 do not represent settlements of cases assessed during that fiscal year, but instead are settlements of cases transmitted and assessed during that year or earlier. Summary 2 To provide more transparency, Assessment and Settlement Summary 2, below, reflects assessment information for those cases closed during Fiscal Year 2009. All numbers in Summary 2 reflect the assessments which resulted in Fiscal Year 2009 settlements even though the assessments may have occurred in a prior fiscal year. This summary will provide the reader with (1) the difference between the initial amount of civil penalties assessed and the settlement amount and (2) the difference between the revised assessment and the final assessment amount. Note: The number of violations contained in an individual “case” can range from one violation to five or more, depending on a number of factors. The number of cases assessed or settled during a specific period does not provide a platform for realistic comparison. Thus the number of assessments or transmittals is expressed in terms of the number of “violations,” which provides an opportunity for standardized review. Assessment and Settlement SUMMARY
Recommended publications
  • It's a Great Time to Be in the Railroad Business, but If You're a Short Line That's Going to Make It, You've Got to Lear

    It's a Great Time to Be in the Railroad Business, but If You're a Short Line That's Going to Make It, You've Got to Lear

    SHORT TAKES Caddo Valley Railroad Co. Headquarters: Glenwood, Ark. Route: 52.9 miles from Gurdon to Bird Mill, Ark. Interchange: Gurdon, with UP PREX GP16 1610 cuts through the piney woods near Gurdon, Ark. It’s a great time to be in the railroad business, but if you’re a short line that’s going to make it, you’ve got to learn how to add big-time value by Roy Blanchard riters such as Archie Robertson, Lucius road, or about 30 percent of the U.S. rail sys- Beebe, and William S. Young prepared us tem. They handle more than 12 million revenue Wfor short lines of an unhurried nature. Far units a year.* from the hustle and bustle of big-city commerce, Of the short lines operating today, 16 are these railroads went about their business in a lei- owned by Class I railroads, and they fall into two surely way. Robertson captured such lines in categories: switching and terminal railroads, and 1945’s Slow Train to Yesterday; Beebe immortal- actual short lines like the Winston-Salem South- ized them in his 1947 classic Mixed Train Daily; bound (a joint property of Norfolk Southern and and Young kept TRAINS readers informed about CSX, and a holdover from joint control of Norfolk the little roads well into the 1950s with his & Western and Atlantic Coast Line) or the Texas monthly column, “Short Lines.” Mexican (Kansas City Southern). The three best The 1980 Staggers Act [page 10], the subse- known are probably the Belt Railway of Chicago quent deregulation of railroad rates, and Wall (owned by six Class Is), probably the biggest Street have combined to end all that.
  • ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives

    ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives

    ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives Michelle Bergin, GA Environmental Protection Division Matthew Harrell, IL Environmental Protection Agency Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium Acknowledgments: Steve Sullivan, American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association David Powell, Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Dennis McGeen, Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Lisa Higgins, Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection Laurel Driver, US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Support Byeong Kim, GA Environmental Protection Division Introduction Air protection agencies from twenty-seven states, coordinated through the Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Committee (ERTAC) and headed by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), identified a need to better quantify and characterize rail-related emissions inventories. Traditional locomotives utilize large diesel engines, resulting in emissions of NO x, diesel PM, hydrocarbons, greenhouse gases, and other air pollutants. These emissions are sometimes concentrated in areas exceeding National Ambient Air Quality Standards. No cohesive nationwide railroad emission estimates based on local operations are known to have been made previously. Inventory development methods for locomotive emissions estimates vary from state to state and, in general, lack the spatial or temporal resolution needed to support air quality modeling and planning 1-5. The ERTAC Rail Subcommittee (ERTAC Rail) was established with active representatives from twelve member states, three regional planning offices, and the US EPA. The subcommittee’s goals are to (1) standardize agencies’ inventory development methods through a collaborative effort, (2) improve the quality of data received and the resulting emission inventories, and (3) reduce the administrative burden on railroad companies of providing data.
  • CP's North American Rail

    CP's North American Rail

    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
  • October 2017

    October 2017

    May 2017 Error! No text of specified style in document. fff October 2017 September 2016 E r r o r ! No text of specified style in document. | i Indiana State Rail Plan Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1 PURPOSE OF THE INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN .................................................................................................. S-1 S.2 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. S-1 S.3 INDIANA RAIL NETWORK ............................................................................................................................ S-3 S.4 PASSENGER RAIL ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ................................... S-7 S.5 SAFETY/CROSSING ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................... S-9 S.6 FREIGHT RAIL ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. S-9 S.7 RAIL SERVICE AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................ S-12 1 THE ROLE OF RAIL IN STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION (OVERVIEW) ................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTENT .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 MULTIMODAL
  • The Official Railway Guideா

    The Official Railway Guideா

    THE OFFICIAL RAILWAY GUIDEா FREIGHT SERVICE EDITION THE OFFICIAL 1ST QUARTER 2018 Vol. 151, No. 1 RAILWAY GUIDE Associate Director, TABLE OF CONTENTS Product Management Matthew DeNapoli [email protected] 973-776-7813 Indices Editor Aimee Miller A Carrier Index ....................................... A3 [email protected] 609-422-7818 Geographic Abbreviations (Index of States & Consulting Editor Kelvin MacKavanagh Provinces) ....................................... A10 Manager, Production Edward McCarthy [email protected] 609-433-6330 National Carrier Services & Facilities Production Coordinator Nancy Filan [email protected] 609-433-3539 National Carriers .................................... B1 B Sr. Production Coordinator Carolyn Tizzano [email protected] 973-420-3709 Regional Carrier Services & Facilities How to Use This Section ............................ C1 C ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES Map of THE OFFICIAL RAILWAY GUIDE Regions ...... C2 United States: US$299 (plus $18 shipping and Regional Carrier Index .............................. C4 handling and applicable Sales Tax) Regional Carriers ................................... C9 Foreign/Canadian orders: US$299 (plus $40 shipping and handling and applicable Sales Tax) Connections D The Bulk Connection ................................ D1 CUSTOMER SERVICE The Official Railway Guide Station Index P.O. Box 3000 E How to Use This Section ............................ E1 Northbrook, IL 60065-9742 United States ......................................
  • Rail-Hwy Crossing Inventory Bulletin No.17,1994

    Rail-Hwy Crossing Inventory Bulletin No.17,1994

    HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSING ACCIDENT/INCIDENT AND INVENTORY BULLETIN NO. 17 CALENDAR YEAR 1994 W4444444444444444444 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of the information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use. This document only reflects data information. Information is viewed in summaries and tables. No graphics are depicted in this document. This document is prepared in WordPerfect 6.1 and saved as a WordPerfect 5.1 document with fonts defined in courier new, 10pt., and the top, bottom, left, and right margins are the smallest possible. Remember that you may have to adjust your font to enable proper printing or viewing of this document. Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety, RRS-22 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS INTRODUCTION ......................................... RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROCEDURE CONSTANTS .............. TABLE-S. Summary of Highway-Rail Crossing Accident Statistics for the Nation ............................ HISTORICAL ACCIDENT TRENDS - DATA TABLE 1. Summary of Accidents/Incidents and Casualties at Highway-Rail Crossings ........................ TABLE 2. Summary of Accidents/Incidents and Accident Rates at Highway-Rail Crossings Involving Motor Vehicles .......................... CURRENT YEAR ACCIDENT DATA AT PUBLIC CROSSINGS ONLY - DATA TABLE 3. Accidents/Incidents at Highway-Rail Crossings by State ............... TABLE 4. MV Accidents/Incidents at Highway-Rail Crossings by State ............... TABLE 5. Accidents/Incidents at Highway-Rail by Type of Motor Vehicle ......... TABLE 6. MV Accidents/Incidents at Highway-Rail Crossings by Type of Consist ..... TABLE 7. MV Accidents/Incidents at Highway-Rail Crossings by Warning Device by Railroad .........................
  • Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

    Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

    Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14
  • Railroad Contacts

    Railroad Contacts

    RAILROAD CONTACTS RAILROAD AAR REPORTING MARK ARKANSAS OKLAHOMA RAILROAD AOK Railroad Contact: Registered Agent: Patricia Donoley George M. Kern 116 W. Main Street 300 E. Choctaw Wilburton, OK 74578 McAlester, OK 74501 ARKANSAS SOUTHERN RAILROAD ARS Corporate Contact: Registered Agent: Arkansas Southern Railroad, LLC Corporation Service Company Craig Richey, Chief General Counsel 10300 Greenbriar Place Watco Companies, LLC Oklahoma City, OK 73159-7653 315 W 3rd Street Pittsburg, KS 66762-4706 AUSTIN, TODD & LADD RAILROAD ATLT Corporate Contact: Todd Owen Lafferty, General Counsel Wheeler Brothers Grain Company, LLC PO Box 29 Watonga, OK 73772-0029 BLACKWELL NORTHERN GATEWAY RAILROAD BNGR Railroad Contact: Registered Agent: Scott Nauer, Director of Operations The Corporation Company Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad 1833 S. Morgan Road 1910 W. Ferguson Oklahoma City, OK 73128 Blackwell, OK 74631 BURLINGTON NORTHERN-SANTA FE RAILROAD BNSF Corporate Contact: Registered Agent: BNSF Railway Company The Corporation Company Jill K. Mulligan, VP and General Counsel 1833 S. Morgan Road 2500 Lou Menk Dr. AOB-3 Oklahoma City, OK 73128 Fort Worth, TX 76131-2828 CIMARRON VALLEY RAILROAD CVR Corporate Contact: Registered Agent: David L. Durbano The Corporation Company The Western Group LC 1833 S. Morgan Road 3811 South Airport Road, Building N714 Oklahoma City, OK 73128 Ogden, UT 84405 DEQUEEN & EASTERN RAILROAD DQE Corporate Contact: Registered Agent: Bradley Gordon, Vice President and Legal Counsel Corporation Service Company Patriot Rail Company, LLC 10300 Greenbriar Place 10752 Deerwood Park Blvd. Ste. 300 Oklahoma City, OK 73159-7653 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Revised 7/23/2020 RAILROAD AAR REPORTING MARK FARMRAIL/ GRAINBELT CORPORATION FMRC/GNBC Railroad Contact: Judy A.
  • RAILROAD HERITAGE GROWING up in a RAILROAD VACUUM Photography, Trains, and Mentorship

    RAILROAD HERITAGE GROWING up in a RAILROAD VACUUM Photography, Trains, and Mentorship

    2017:4 RAILROAD HERITAGE ® 2017:4 · FALL · 1 GROWING UP IN A RAILROAD VACUUM Photography, trains, and mentorship STORY AND PHOTOGRAPHS Richard Koenig An eastbound local train on the Sioux City branch of the Illinois Central Gulf’s Iowa Division trundles over rickety track between Alta and Storm Lake, Iowa, in the summer of 1979. 14 · RAILROAD HERITAGE GROWING UP IN A RAILROAD VACUUM Photography, trains, and mentorship 2017:4 · FALL · 15 A RAIL ENTHUSIAST DURING my teens, I lost touch pictures for some time using my father’s 35mm Agfa with trains for several decades but have recently had camera that he had procured in Europe during his the joy of rediscovering them—along with my early time in the service in the 1950s. I was hooked by pho- slides and negatives. After leaving my home in the tography the first time he spread out in front of me Midwest, I studied photography at Pratt Institute and the rangefinder with its many accouterments—lens went to work in New York as a studio manager for shade, colored filters, and a wonderful stainless-steel a still-life advertising photographer. After continued self-timer that attached to the shutter release button. I study of photography in graduate school at Indiana began taking pictures around age ten, climbing trees University, I transitioned into academia as a professor to see what the world might look like from that higher of art at Kalamazoo College in Michigan. There I vantage point. After moving to the east side of town, had the notion to document along the first transconti- images of trains naturally followed.
  • Indiana Railroads

    Indiana Railroads

    INDIANLong AMichiana RAILROADS INDIANShAores RAILROADS Fremont Beach New SB Bristol CS N N B I N B !( Carlisle C S S R Elkhart S N S Beverly EW NS S N S !( S Whiting C Trail Creek NS C !( Shores X S CSSB S Osceola Angola !( N Ogden CS C N !( N !( S TK S SB N !( East Chicago X AM CN S B Dunes S Lagrange !( NS C La Porte South Bend Mishawaka Steuben H I E N !( EJ S S CS B X Chesterton !( Goshen N !( S CN St Joseph Indiana Railroads and Abbreviations CSX S !( Burns !( Hamilton Munster !(C N Hudson E C Elkhart Westville S S Ashley J Harbor Millersburg Highland !( Kingsbury S N S E B S C CS CSX N PGRV IN IN AMTK Amtrak RR N Griffith N X !( S C C Valparaiso SX Dyer S Ligonier S CN N N Walkerton X C N Kendallville S BLRR Bee Line RR CN !( S CSX !( Corunna Butler N CN !( CSX NS Wanatah Kingsford CSX Bremen CSX NS K !( X !( T !( Merrillville NS R Waterloo NS S Cromwell N CS N CS Albion S CAPA City of Auburn Port Authority St. Cedar X C Heights S Nappanee X CS S CSX X C Auburn Lake N SX John Porter N NS Hamlet CEIW Central Indiana & Western RR S CSX CS Plymouth Avilla !( S N X Altona N C N !( S S CS N X Leesburg CSX Lake X S S !( Noble N CS CERA Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis RR S Garrett X C St.
  • Robert A. Frederick Railroad Photographs, 1891–1980S

    Robert A. Frederick Railroad Photographs, 1891–1980S

    Collection # P486 ROBERT A. FREDERICK RAILROAD PHOTOGRAPHS, 1891–1980S Collection Information Biographical Sketch Scope and Content Note Series Contents Cataloging Information Processed by Kurt Jung, 2007 Revised by Warner Clark and Dorothy A. Nicholson December 2011 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 1 half size manuscript box COLLECTION: 11 photograph boxes 2 OVA photograph folders COLLECTION 1891–1980s DATES: PROVENANCE: Terry Royalty Auctioneer, 1997 RESTRICTIONS: None COPYRIGHT: I.H.S. does not own copyright to all images in this collection. Only images with Robert A. Frederick stamp on verso are copyrighted by I.H.S. REPRODUCTION Researchers must contact individual photographers listed on RIGHTS: verso of photographs for permission to publish. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1997.0680 NUMBER: NOTES: BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Robert A. Frederick was born June 3, 1924 in Indianapolis. Mr. Frederick was a life-long employee of the Pennsylvania Railroad. According to an article in the collection featuring Frederick, he was a Pennsylvania Railroad engineer and began working on the railroad about 1942. The article also stated that he was an avid model railroader. Frederick photographed trains and also purchased photographs from others. He acquired many images of Pennsylvania Railroad property; which at the time was the largest (by traffic and revenue) railroad in the U.S.A. The Polk City Directories list him as an engineer for the Pennsylvania Railroad in 1964 and 1965. These same directories also list him as residing at the same address on the southeast side of Metropolitan Indianapolis in 1997.
  • INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY, Et Al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 19-Cv-06466 ) V

    INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY, Et Al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 19-Cv-06466 ) V

    Case: 1:19-cv-06466 Document #: 96 Filed: 09/30/20 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:<pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 19-cv-06466 ) v. ) ) Judge Edmond E. Chang ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, ) et al. ) ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ) ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, et al., ) ) Intervenor-Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In August 2019, Illinois enacted a law that requires a minimum of two crew members in order to operate a freight train. Public Act 101-0294. A railroad and two railroad organizations filed this lawsuit against the Illinois Commerce Commission (known by its acronym, the ICC), which is the state agency that would otherwise enforce this minimum crew-size requirement. The Indiana Rail Road Company, the Association of American Railroads, and the American Short Line and Regional Rail- road Association (together, referred to as the Railroads) contend that at least three federal laws preempt the Illinois law. R. 1, Compl. On the opposite side from the rail- road industry, two Unions successfully sought to intervene to defend the state law Case: 1:19-cv-06466 Document #: 96 Filed: 09/30/20 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:<pageID> (referred to as the Crew Size Law for convenience’s sake). R. 33, Int. Order.1 All par- ties now move for summary judgment. See R. 49, Pls.’ Mot. Summ. J.; R. 58, Int.’s Mot. Summ. J.; R. 66, Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. For the reasons discussed below, the rail- road industry’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and correspondingly the ICC’s and Unions’ motions are denied (except for one narrow claim).