DOCSLIB.ORG

The Original Documents Are Located in Box 66

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The original documents are located in Box 66, folder “10/19/76 S1026 Omnibus Wilderness Designations” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 66 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ACTION THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Last Day: October 19 October 17, 1976 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: JIM CANNONI{i); ~ SUBJECT: S. 1026 - Omnibus Wilderness Designations Attached for your consideration is S. 1026, sponsored by Senator Jackson. The enrolled bill would designate as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: 16 areas within the Interior/National Wildlife Refuge System comprising approximately 155,156 acres located in 11 States; Three areas within the Agriculture/National Forest System comprising approximately 232,415 acres in three States. In addition, the enrolled bill would designate eight wilderness study areas encompassing approximately 587,364 acres of national forest lands in three States for possible future designation as wilderness areas. A detailed explanation of the provisions of the enrolled bill is provided in OMB's enrolled bill report at Tab A. Agency Recommendations The Department of the Interior recommends approval of the enrolled bill. Of the 16 wilderness areas which would be established in national wildlife refuges, 10 are identical to Executive Branch recommendations, while the remaining six areas would be expanded from the Administration's original proposals, comprising 45,000 acres, to a total of 61,000 acres. Interior has reviewed the additional acreage and has no objection to its inclusion. The Department of Agriculture recommends disapproval of the enrolled bill because: Of the three national forest areas which S. 1026 would designate as wilderness, only one of them has been adequately studied. (the Fitzpatrick Wilderness) 2 One of the two "instant" wildernesses, the Kaiser Wilderness in the Sierra National Forest, has been reviewed for wilderness values and the Department has determined that the 22,500-acre Kaiser area should be managed for a broader range of resource uses--including timber harvesting--than would be possible under wilderness designation. The hodgepodge of wilderness study areas created and the time deadline for studies, would disrupt and delay the systematic efforts of the Department to complete studies of 274 areas totaling 12.3 million acres now under review for wilderness potential as a result of the Department's comprehensive survey of roadless areas in the national forests. OMB recommends approval of the enrolled bill. They also point out that you should be aware of a provision in a National Park System omnibus enrolled bill, H.R. 13160, which would remove the so-called "Whiskey Mountain" wilderness area from the Fitzpatrick Wilderness that would be designated under s. 1026. OMB states: "Although the Congressional intent with respect to these two conflicting provisions is unclear, the effect of the provision in H.R. 13160, if that enrolled bill is signed after S. 1026, would be to eliminate at least part of the objectionable wilderness designation in S. 1026. In this regard, if you decide to approve • both bills, Agriculture strongly recommends that s. 1026 be approved at least one day before you approve H.R. 13160." Staff Recommendations- Max Friedersdorf, Counsel's Office (Lazarus) and I recommend approval of s. 1026. Recommendation That you sign s. 1026 at Tab B. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 OCT 13 1976 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Subject: Enrolled Bill s. 1026 - Omnibus wilderness designations Sponsor - Sen. Jackson (D) Washington Last Day for Action October 19, 1976 - Tuesday Purpose Designates 19 wilderness areas encompassing some 387,571 acres in 13 States and establishes eight wilderness study areas encompassing approximately 587,364 acres in three of these States. Agency Recommendations Office of Management and Budget Approval Department of the Interior Approval Council on Environmental Quality Approval Department of Defense No objection Federal Power Commission No objection Department of Commerce No objection Department of Transportation No objection Department of Agriculture Disapproval (Memoran- dum of Disapproval attached) Discussion Under the Wilderness Act, Agriculture and Interior are required to make recommendations to the President for additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System, and the President is required to submit these, along with his own recommendations, to the Congress. To qualify for wilderness designation, an area must generally 2 be undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation, which is protected and managed so as to pre­ serve its natural conditions. s. 1026 would designate as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (a} 16 areas within the Interior/National Wildlife Refuge System comprising approx­ imately 155,156 acres located in 11 States; and (b) three areas within the Agriculture/National Forest System com­ prising approximately 232,415 acres in three States. Each of these wilderness areas would be administered under the provisions of the Wilderness Act, which means its primitive, natural condition would be preserved. In addition, the bill would designate eight wilderness study areas encompassing approximately 587,364 acres of national forest lands in three States for possible future designation as wilderness areas. The bill specifies that the first of these studies would have to be completed within 19 months, with three other studies scheduled for completion at the end of 2 years and the remaining four studies to be completed in 5 years. Of the 19 areas encompassing 387,571 acres which S. 1026 would designate as wilderness, 17 are related to specific Administration proposals to designate 321,691 acres as wilderness. Attached to this memorandum is a list of the areas and location of lands which would be affected by s. 1026. In its enrolled bill letter, the Department of Agriculture urges your disapproval of S. 1026. Agriculture's primary concern is that of the three national forest areas which S. 1026 would designate as wilderness, only one of them (the proposed Fitzpatrick Wilderness in the Shoshone National Forest) has been adequately studied. Agriculture is fundamentally opposed to the "instant" wilderness designation of the other two areas without a prior wilder­ ness study, minerals survey, and public involvement as prescribed in the Wilderness Act of 1964. Agriculture also points out that one of these two "instant" wilder­ nesses which S. 1026 would create, the proposed Kaiser Wilderness in the Sierra National Forest, has been reviewed 3 for wilderness values and the Department has determined that the 22,500-acre Kaiser area should be managed for a broader range of resource uses -- including timber harvesting -- than would be possible under wilderness designation. Furthermore, Agriculture's letter expresses substantial concern with the piecemeal approach to designating wilder­ ness study areas which s. 1026 would effect. Agriculture states that the hodgepodge of wilderness study areas which s. 1026 would establish, and the time deadline for studies, would disrupt and delay the systematic efforts of the Department to complete studies of 274 areas totaling 12.3 million acres now under review for wilderness potential as a result of the Department's comprehensive survey of roadless areas in the national forests. The Department of the Interior, taking the opposite view in its attached enrolled bill letter, recommends that you approve s. 1026. Interior points out that all 16 wilderness areas which would be established in national wildlife refuges were recommended by the Administration. Ten of these areas are identical to Executive Branch recom­ mendations, while the remaining six areas would be expanded from the Administration's original proposals, comprising -45,000 acres, to a total of approximately 61,000 acres. Interior notes that it has reviewed the additional acreage in each refuge and has no opposition to the inclusion of these areas in wilderness status. Finally, Interior notes that it is aware of Agriculture's concerns regarding the instant wildernesses, and then concludes that: " ••. While we agree that Congressional action establishing wilderness areas without having mineral surveys is an unfortunate precedent, we do not believe that it is an adequate basis for vetoing this enrolled bill." Conclusion While we share Agriculture's basic concerns with respect to the "instant" wilderness designation of Forest Service lands and the requirement for additional wilderness studies, on balance, we join
Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]

    Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-18054, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Parts 26, 32, 36, and 71 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000] RIN 1018-BD79 2019–2020 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open seven National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) that are currently closed to hunting and sport fishing. In addition, we expand hunting and sport fishing at 70 other NWRs, and add pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 2019–2020 season. We also formally open 15 units of the National Fish Hatchery System to hunting and sport fishing. We also add pertinent station- specific regulations that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing at these 15 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHs) for the 2019–2020 season. This rule includes global administrative updates to every NWR entry in our refuge- specific regulations and the reorganization of general public use regulations. We remove approximately 2,100 regulations that will have no impact on the administration of hunting and sport fishing within the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also simplify over 2,900 refuge- specific regulations to comply with a Presidential mandate to adhere to plain language standards 1 and to reduce the regulatory burden on the public.
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
  • 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–15 Edition) § 32.44

    50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–15 Edition) § 32.44

    § 32.44 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–15 Edition) 4. Deer check station dates, locations, and the field, including shot shells used for hunt- requirements are designated in the refuge ing wild turkey (see § 32.2(k)). brochure. Prior to leaving the refuge, you B. Upland Game Hunting. We allow upland must check all harvested deer at the nearest game hunting on designated areas of the ref- self-service check station following the post- uge in accordance with State regulations ed instructions. subject to the following conditions: 5. Hunters may possess and hunt from only 1. Condition A3 applies. one stand or blind. Hunters may place a deer 2. We allow upland game hunting on the stand or blind 48 hours prior to a hunt and 131-acre mainland unit of Boone’s Crossing must remove it within 48 hours after each with archery methods only. On Johnson Is- designated hunt with the exception of closed land, we allow hunting of game animals dur- areas where special regulations apply (see ing Statewide seasons using archery methods brochure). or shotguns using shot no larger than BB. 6. During designated muzzleloader hunts, C. Big Game Hunting. We allow hunting of we allow archery equipment and deer and turkey on designated areas of the muzzleloaders loaded with a single ball; we refuge in accordance with State regulations prohibit breech-loading firearms of any type. subject to the following conditions: 7. Limited draw hunts require a Limited 1. We prohibit the construction or use of Hunt Permit (name/address/phone number) permanent blinds, platforms, or ladders at assigned by random computer drawing.
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
  • Branta Bernicla) in HOOD CANAL and LOWER PUGET SOUND

    Branta Bernicla) in HOOD CANAL and LOWER PUGET SOUND

    Washington Birds 10:1-10 (2008) BREEDING ORIGINS AND POPULATIONS OF WINTERING AND SPRING MIGRANT BRANT (Branta bernicla) IN HOOD CANAL AND LOWER PUGET SOUND Bryan L. Murphie Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563 [email protected] Greg A. Schirato Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563 [email protected] Don K. Kraege Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 [email protected] Dave H. Ward U.S. Geological Service, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Research Center 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 [email protected] James C. Sedinger University of Nevada 1000 Valley Road Reno, Nevada 89557 [email protected] James E. Hines Canadian Wildlife Service Suite 301 - 5204, 50th Ave. Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 1E2 [email protected] Karen S. Bollinger U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management 1412 Airport Way, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 [email protected] Brant (Branta bernicla) migrate and winter along the west coast of North America (Reed et al. 1989). These geese originate from breeding colonies in Alaska, Northwest Territories, Yukon, and northeastern Russia (Einarsen 1965, Palmer 1976, Bellrose 1980, Reed et al. 1989). The population was recently estimated at approximately 130,000 birds (Trost 1998, Wahl et al. 2005). Mexico has been recognized as a major wintering area for 2 Murphie et al. Brant (Smith and Jensen 1970) and Washington, especially Puget Sound, supports the largest concentration of Brant north of Mexico in winter and >90% of the Brant during northward migration (Pacific Flyway Council 2002).
  • Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands In

    Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands In

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Final Draft September 2011 Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Primary Contact Jeff Holm Chief, R1 Branch of Transportation, Refuge Roads Coordinator, R1 & R8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System 911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97232 [email protected] 503/231-2161 Acknowledgements Mike Marxen, Chief, R1 Branch of Visitor Services and Communication Paul Hayduk, R1 Hatchery and Facility Operations Coordinator Roxanne Bash, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Special Thanks Steve Suder, National Coordinator, Refuge Transportation Program, FWS Nathan Caldwell, National Alternative Transportation Coordinator, FWS Alex Schwartz, R1 Landscape Architect Kirk Lambert, R1 Asset Management Coordinator David Drescher, Chief, R1 Refuge Information Susan Law, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Pete Field, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Consultant Team Atkins Melissa Allen, AICP Steve Hoover, AICP Tina Brand Cover Photo: David Pitkin/USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Region 1 Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................... .ES-1 Why was the Long Range Transportation Plan for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands initiated? .... .ES-1 What are the Goals for this Long Range Transportation
  • TAUM SAUK AREA THREATENED by HYDRO PLANT by Susan Flader

    TAUM SAUK AREA THREATENED by HYDRO PLANT by Susan Flader

    (This article was first published in Heritage, the Newsletter of the Missouri Parks Association, August 2001) TAUM SAUK AREA THREATENED BY HYDRO PLANT by Susan Flader When state park officials selected a cover photo to illustrate their first-ever assessment of "threats to the parks" nearly a decade ago, they chose not a scene of despoliation but a symbolic representation of the best of what they were seeking to protect. It was a vista at the core of the Ozarks, looking from the state's grandest waterfall near its tallest peak across its deepest valley into the heart of Taum Sauk Mountain State Park, Missouri's then-newest public park but also its geologically oldest, wildest, most intact, and most ecologically diverse landscape. Scarcely could one imagine that the very symbol of what they were seeking to protect through their threats study, titled "Challenge of the '90s," would itself become the most seriously threatened landscape in Missouri at the dawn of the new millennium. The photo showed two forest-blanketed, time-gentled igneous knobs in the heart of the St. Francois Mountains, on the left Smoke Hill, recently acquired by the state, and on the right Church Mountain, leased to the Department of Natural Resources for park trail development by Union Electric Company of St. Louis (now AmerenUE). But on June 8, the Ameren Development Company, a subsidiary of Ameren Corporation, filed an application for a preliminary permit with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Church Mountain Pumped Storage Project. It would consist of a 130-acre reservoir ringed by a 12,350-foot-long, 90-foot-high dam on the top of Church Mountain, a lower reservoir of 400 acres formed by a 1,900-foot-long, 100-foot high dam flooding several miles of Taum Sauk Creek, which has been designated a State Outstanding Resource Water, and associated tunnels, powerhouse, transmission lines, roads, and related facilities.
  • Newsletter September 2015

    Newsletter September 2015

    the wyoming game & fish department LANDERLANDER REGIONREGION newsletter september 2015 Under the Water Fishing in Upper Bull Lake Drainage Golden trout from Bull Lake Creek drainage The Wyoming Game and Fish Department sampled fisheries in the upper Inside: Bull Lake Creek drainage within the Fitzpatrick Wilderness in early August. Twelve lakes were surveyed and only one, Shield Lake, had no fish. Golden Bat blitz pg 3 trout were found in all other lakes that were visited. Fish up to 19.4 inches Golden and brook trout pg 4 were found and good numbers were discovered in most lakes (Table 1). Law Enforcement pg 5 Four Creek Lake and Sassafras Lake provide the best opportunity to catch a Antelope Surveys pg 6 trophy golden trout. Marked Tree Lake, the lowest lake sampled in the drainage, also supports cutthroat trout. The creek upstream of Marked Tree FW Families pg 7 Lake has natural barriers that prevent cutthroat trout from migrating to Outreach pg 8 other lakes with golden trout populations. Carnivores pg 8 Serving Dubois, Rawlins, Lander , Riverton and places between Under the Water, continued The upper Bull Lake drainage is a good area for anglers seeking golden trout. For those thinking about planning a trip, it is important to note that this is a rugged drainage with few trails and lots of fallen trees. The most popular route is over Hays Pass from the west side of the Wind River Mountain Range. Upper Golden Lake in the Bull Lake Creek drainage. Table 1. Number, mean length (inches) and length range (inches) of fish captured by gill nets in lakes sam- pled in the Bull Lake Creek drainage in the Fitzpatrick Wilderness July 31 – Aug 8, 2015.
  • Fuller’S Leadership and Over- Vincent of the Refuge Staff Are Notable for Having Sight Were Invaluable

    Fuller’S Leadership and Over- Vincent of the Refuge Staff Are Notable for Having Sight Were Invaluable

    Acknowledgments Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to this plan over many detailed and technical requirements of sub- the last seven years. Several key staff positions, missions to the Service, the Environmental Protec- including mine, have been filled by different people tion Agency, and the Federal Register. Jon during the planning period. Tom Palmer and Neil Kauffeld’s and Nita Fuller’s leadership and over- Vincent of the Refuge staff are notable for having sight were invaluable. We benefited from close col- been active in the planning for the entire extent. laboration and cooperation with staff of the Illinois Tom and Neil kept the details straight and the rest Department of Natural Resources. Their staff par- of us on track throughout. Mike Brown joined the ticipated from the early days of scoping through staff in the midst of the process and contributed new reviews and re-writes. We appreciate their persis- insights, analysis, and enthusiasm that kept us mov- tence, professional expertise, and commitment to ing forward. Beth Kerley and John Magera pro- our natural resources. Finally, we value the tremen- vided valuable input on the industrial and public use dous involvement of citizens throughout the plan- aspects of the plan. Although this is a refuge plan, ning process. We heard from visitors to the Refuge we received notable support from our regional office and from people who care about the Refuge without planning staff. John Schomaker provided excep- ever having visited. Their input demonstrated a tional service coordinating among the multiple level of caring and thought that constantly interests and requirements within the Service.
  • Proposed Additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System

    Proposed Additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System

    93d Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 93-403 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OE THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING PROPOSALS FOR THIRTY-SEVEN ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM AND DEFERRAL OF ACTION ON FIVE AREAS SUITABLE FOR INCLUSION IN THE SYSTEM, AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGAINST THE INCLUSION OF FOUR OTHER AREAS STUDIED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 OF THE WILDER- NESS ACT OF 1964 [16 USC 1132] PART 29 ANAHO ISLAND WILDERNESS NEVADA DECEMBER 4, 1974. - Referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed with illustrations. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1974 42-797 O THE WHITE HOUSE WAS HINGTON December 4, 1974 Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964, I am pleased to transmit herewith proposals for thirty-seven additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. As described in the Wilderness Message that I am con- currently sending to the Congress today, the proposed new wilderness areas cover a total of over nine million primeval acres. In addition, the Secretary of the Interior has recommended that Congressional action on five other areas which include surface lands suitable for wilderness be deferred for the reasons set forth below: A. Three areas which are open to mining might be needed in the future to provide vital minerals for the Nation, but these areas have not been adequately surveyed for mineral deposits. The areas are the Kofa Game Range, Arizona; Charles Sheldon Antelope Range, Nevada and Oregon; and, Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Range, Montana.
  • Subject Index

    Subject Index

    SUBJECT INDEX Al .•sTifel Page Pag(} A Aged—Continued Abraham Lincoln, statue of, presenta­ National Employ the Older Worker tion to Israel 29 Week, designation 396 Act for the Prevention and Punish­ Older Americans Act of 1965, appro­ ment of Crimes Against Interna­ priation for effecting provi­ tionally Protected Persons 1997 sions 866 ACTION: Older Americans Month, 1976, proc­ Appropriation for... 22, 642, 656, 777, 1434 lamation 3087 Foster Grandparent Program, Aging, National Institute on, appropri­ person-to-person services to chil­ ation for 11,1423 dren 526 Agricultural Act of 1949, amend­ Peace Corps, appropriation for 1470 ments 183, 187, 188 Programs, extension 526 Agricultural Act of 1954: Special volunteer programs, techni­ Amendments 1500 cal and financial assistance 525 Appropriation for effecting provi­ VISTA, appropriation limitations 525 sions 867 Administrative Conference of the Agricultural Act of 1956, appropri­ United States: ation for effecting provisions 1057 Appropriation for 968 Agricultural Act of 1961, appropri­ Rulemaking procedure report, time ation for effecting provisions 857 extension 588 Agricultural Act of 1970: Adult Education Act: Amendment 991 Amendments 1233, 2218, 2221, 2237 Appropriation for effecting provi­ Appropriation for effecting provi­ sions 857, 864, 865 sions 1427 Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938: Advisory Commission on Intergovern­ Amendments 181,187, 285,1489 mental Relations. See Intergovern­ Appropriation for effecting provi­ mental Relations, Advisory Com­ sions 857 mission on. Agricultural Commodities. See also Advisory Committee on Federal Pay, individual commodities. appropriation for 968 United States Grain Standards Act Advocacy, Office of, establishment 668 of 1976 2967 Agricultural Library, National, appro­ Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, priation for 855 National, amendments 1270, 1988 Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, Aeronautics and Space Administra­ appropriation for effecting provi­ tion, National.