DOCSLIB.ORG

The Insects and Arachnids of Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Insects and Arachnids of Canada THE INSECTS AND ARACHNIDS OF CANADA THE INSECTS AND ARACHNIDS OF CANADA PART 19 The Ground Spiders of Canada and Alaska Araneae: Gnaphosidae NormanI. Platnick American Museum ofNatural History NewYork,NewYork Charles D. Dondale Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research Ottawa, Ontario ResearchBranch Agriculture Canada Publication 1875 1992 ©Minister ofSupply and Services Canada 1992 Available in Canada through Associated Bookstores and other booksellers or by mail from Canada Communication Group-Publishing Ottawa, Canada K1A OS9 Cat. No. A42-42/1991-19E ISBN 0-660-14222-8 Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Platnick, Norman I. The ground spiders of Canada and Alaska: Araneae: Gnaphosidae (The Insects and arachnids of Canada, 0706-7313; pt. 19) (Publication; 1875) Includes bibliographical references and index. Cat. No. A42-42/1991-19E ISBN 0-660-14222-8 1. Gnaphosidae. 2. Spiders-Canada. 3. Spiders-Alaska. I. Dondale, Charles D. 11. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. Ill. Title. rv. Title: Araneae: Gnaphosidae. V. Series. VI. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English; 1875. QL458.42.G5.P5 1991 595.4'4 C91-099110-3 Staffeditor: Frances Smith The Insects and Arachnids of Canada Part 1. Collecting, Preparing, and Preserving Insects, Mites, and Spiders, compiled by J.E.H. Martin, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1978. 182 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1977-1. Partie 1. Recolte, preparation et conservation des Insectes, des Acariens et des Araignees, compile par J.E.H. Martin, Institut de recherche biosystematique, Ottawa, 1983.205 pp. N° de cat. A42-42/1977-1F. Part 2. The Bark Beetles ofCanadaandAlaska (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), by D.E. Bright, Jr., Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1976. 241 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1976-2. Part 3. The Aradidae ofCanada (Hemiptera: Aradidae), by R. Matsuda, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1977. 116 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1977-3. Part 4. The Anthocoridae of Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), by L.A. Kelton, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1977. 101 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1977-4. Part 5. The Crab Spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Philodromidae and Thomisidae), by C.D. Dondale and J.H. Redner, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1978. 255 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1978-5. Part 6. The Mosquitoes of Canada (Diptera: Culicidae), by D.M. Wood, ET. Dang, and R.A. Ellis, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1979.390 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1979-6. Partie 7. Genera des Trichopteres du Canada et des Etats adjacents, par F. Schmid, Institut de recherches biosystematiques, Ottawa, 1980. 296 pp. N° de cat. A42-42/1980-7F. (Available in French only.) Part 8. The Plant Bugs ofthe Prairie Provinces of Canada (Heteroptera: Miridae), by L.A. Kelton, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1980.408 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1980-8. Part 9. The Sac Spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Clubionidae and Anyphaenidae), by C.D. Dondale and J.H. Redner, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1982. 194 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1982-9E. Part 10. The Spittlebugs ofCanada (Homoptera: Cercopidae), by K.GA Hamilton, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1982. 102 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1982-10E. 3 Part 11. The Genera of Larval Midges of Canada (Diptera: Chironomidae), by D.R Oliver and M.E. Roussel, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1983. 263 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1983-11E. Part 12. The Families and Subfamilies of Canadian Chalcidoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), by C.M. Yoshimoto, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1984. 149 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1983-12E. Part 13. The Carrion Beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Silphidae and Agyrtidae), by RS. Anderson and S.B. Peck, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1985. 121 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1985-13E. Part 14. The Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Related Insects ofCanadaand Adjacent Regions (Ulonata: Dermaptera, Cheleutoptera, Notoptera, Dictuoptera, Grylloptera, and Orthoptera), by V.R Vickery and D.K.McE. Kevan, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, 1986. 918 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1985-14E. Part 15. The Metallic Wood-boring Beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), by D.E. Bright, Biosystematics Research Centre, Ottawa, 1987.335 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1986-15E. Part 16. The Horse Flies and Deer Flies of Canada and Alaska (Diptera: Tabanidae), by H.J. Teskey, Biosystematics Research Centre, Ottawa, 1990. 381 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1990-16E. Part 17. The Wolf Spiders, Nurseryweb Spiders, and Lynx Spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, and Oxyopidae), by C.D. Dondale and J.H. Redner, Biosystematics Research Centre, Ottawa, 1990.383 pp. Cat. No. A42-42/1990-17E. Part 18. The Flower Flies ofthe Subfamily Syrphinae ofCanada, Alaska, and Greenland (Diptera: Syrphidae), by J.R Vockeroth, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Ottawa, 1992. Cat. No. A42-42/ 1991-18E. 4 Contents AcknowledgIllents 7 Introduction 8 Behavior 8 Anatomy............................................... 9 Family Gnaphosidae Simon ................................ 15 Key to genera of Gnaphosidae 16 CM des genres de Gnaphosides 19 Genus Micana Westring ............................... 22 Key to species of Micana ........................... 23 Cle des especes de Micana 27 Genus Zelotes Gistel 69 Key to species ofZelotes 71 Cle des especes de Zelotes 73 Genus Drassyllus Chamberlin .......................... 98 Key to species of Drassyllus 99 Cle des especes de Drassyllus ....................... 103 Genus Urozelotes Mello-Leitao 137 Genus Drassodes Westring ............................. 140 Key to species of Drassodes ....................... .. 141 Cle des especes de Drassodes 142 Genus Gnaphosa Latreille 154 Key to species of Gnaphosa ......................... 156 Cle des especes de Gnaphosa 158 Genus Callilepis Westring 189 Key to species of Callilepis 190 Cle des especes de Callilepis ........................ 190 Genus Sosticus Chamberlin .......................... .. 197 Key to species ofSosticus 198 CM des especes de Sosticus .................... .. 198 Genus Orodrassus Chamberlin 202 Key to species of Orodrassus 203 Cle des especes d'Orodrassus 204 Genus Haplodrassus Chamberlin 210 Key to species of Haplodrassus 211 Cle des especes d'Haplodrassus 212 Genus Litopyllus Chamberlin 224 Genus Sergiolus Simon .............................. .. 226 Key to species ofSergiolus 228 Cle des especes de Sergiolus .......... .. 230 Genus Nodocion Chamberlin ......................... .. 253 Key to species of Nodocion 254 Cle des especes de Nodocion ...................... .. 255 Genus Cesonia Simon ............................... .. 265 5 Genus Herpyllus Hentz 269 Key to species of Herpyllus 270 Cle des especes d'Herpyllus ....................... .. 270 Genus Scotophaeus Simon 277 Glossary 280 References. ........................................... .. 285 Index.................................................. 293 6 Acknowledg ments The authors acknowledge with thanks the important contributions to this book by many people. We thank particularly Mohammad U. Shadab, American Museum of Natural History, who made most ofthe original line drawings; James H. Redner, Centre for Landand Biological Resources Research, who added 26 new drawings, made the range maps, labeled and mounted all the illustrations for publication, and critically reviewed the text; Louis Sorkin, American Museum ofNatural History, who tested the keys and made helpful suggestions for improvements to the manuscript. Donald J. Buckle, Saskatoon, Sask., and Daniel T. Jennings, UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture, ForestService, who contributed numerous new locality data for species of Gnaphosidae. Staff members of the Centre for Land and Biologicial Resources Research and John Murphy, Hampton, Middlesex, England, reviewed the manuscript in final form. The manuscript was edited by Research Program Service. 7 Introd uction The ground spiders, or Gnaphosidae, are stealthy hunters. They live in plant litter, in crevices on tree trunks, and among stones. Most are nocturnal, spending the daylight hours hidden in silken retreats. Because ofthis secretive way oflife, these spiders are most often collected by pitfall traps set into the ground (Martin 1978). They may also be collected by sifting through litter and by turning over stones or logs. Until recently, ground spiders were among the least well known of North American spiders. A series of generic revisions using modern methods (Platnick 1975, Platnick and Shadab 1975a-1988, Platnick and Murphy 1984) has now improved this situation, however, and the species and genera rest on a reasonably stable base, at least for adults ofthe North American fauna. Grimm (1985) has revised some European representatives. Much work remains to be done on the relationships among the numerous genera and on those of the family itself to other families of hunting spiders, as well as on behavior and ecology. Ground spiders are important to agriculture and to forestry as biological control agents. They feed largely on pests that eat various crops. They are, however, difficult to manipulate and therefore work bestwhere they occur naturally. Crop areas should be tested and spraying practices modified to prevent the destruction ofthese beneficial arachnids and to make full use of their potential. Behavior Behavioral information on ground spiders is rather sparse, owing to their secretive way oflife and, until recently, to the difficulty ofidentifying specimens. According to Grimm (1985), most ground spiders
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida: Araneae) Para México Y Listado Actualizado De La Araneofauna Del Estado De Coahuila
    ISSN 0065-1737 (NUEVA SERIE) 34(1) 2018 e ISSN 2448-8445 NUEVOS REGISTROS DE ARAÑAS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) PARA MÉXICO Y LISTADO ACTUALIZADO DE LA ARANEOFAUNA DEL ESTADO DE COAHUILA NEW RECORDS OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) FROM MEXICO AND LISTING OF SPIDERS FROM COAHUILA STATE Marco Antonio DESALES-LARA,1,2 María Luisa JIMÉNEZ3,* y Pablo CORCUERA2 1 Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa (UAM-I). Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186. Col. Vicentina Iztapalapa, C.P. 09340, Cd de México, México <[email protected]> 2 Laboratorio de Ecología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa (UAM-I). Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186. Col. Vicentina Iztapalapa, C.P. 09340, Cd de México, México. <pcmr@ xanum.uam.mx> 3 Laboratorio de Aracnología y Entomología, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, C.P. 23096 La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. <[email protected]> *Autor para correspondencia: <[email protected]> Recibido: 27/06/2017; aceptado: 01/12/2017 Editor responsable: Guillermo Ibarra Núñez Desales-Lara, M. A., Jiménez, M. L. y Corcuera, P. (2018) Nuevos Desales-Lara, M. A., Jiménez, M. L., & Corcuera, P. (2018) New registros de arañas (Arachnida: Araneae) para México y listado records of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from Mexico and listing actualizado de la araneofauna del estado de Coahuila. Acta Zooló- of spiders from Coahuila state. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s), gica Mexicana (n.s), 34(1), 50-63. 34(1), 50-63. RESUMEN. Se dan a conocer cuatro nuevos registros de especies ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnids (Excluding Acarina and Pseudoscorpionida) of the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS THE MUSEUM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY NUMBER 67 5 SEPTEMBER 1980 ARACHNIDS (EXCLUDING ACARINA AND PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA) OF THE WICHITA MOUNTAINS WILDLIFE REFUGE, OKLAHOMA JAMES C. COKENDOLPHER AND FRANK D. BRYCE The Wichita Mountains are located in eastern Greer, southern Kiowa, and northwestern Comanche counties in Oklahoma. Since their formation more than 300 million years ago, these rugged mountains have been fragmented and weathered, until today the highest peak (Mount Pinchot) stands only 756 meters above sea level (Tyler, 1977). The mountains are composed predominantly of granite and gabbro. Forests of oak, elm, and walnut border most waterways, while at elevations from 153 to 427 meters prair­ ies are the predominant vegetation type. A more detailed sum­ mary of the climatic and biotic features of the Wichitas has been presented by Blair and Hubbell (1938). A large tract of land in the eastern range of the Wichita Moun­ tains (now northeastern Comanche County) was set aside as the Wichita National Forest by President McKinley during 1901. In 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt created a game preserve on those lands managed by the Forest Service. Since 1935, this pre­ serve has been known as the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. Numerous papers on Oklahoma spiders have been published (Bailey and Chada, 1968; Bailey et al., 1968; Banks et al, 1932; Branson, 1958, 1959, 1966, 1968; Branson and Drew, 1972; Gro- thaus, 1968; Harrel, 1962, 1965; Horner, 1975; Rogers and Horner, 1977), but only a single, comprehensive work (Banks et al., 1932) exists covering all arachnid orders in the state. Further additions and annotations to the arachnid fauna of Oklahoma can be found 2 OCCASIONAL PAPERS MUSEUM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY in recent revisionary studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Parson Spiders
    Colorado Arthropod of Interest Parson Spiders Scientific Name: Herpyllus species Order: Araneae (Spiders) Family: Gnaphosidae (Ground Spiders) Identification and Descriptive Features: The parson spiders are moderately large spiders (female 6.5-13mm; male 4.5-6.5mm) with overall black color. A broken white or silvery stripe prominently marks the back of the abdomen. (This marking is reminiscent of the old style neck band cravat formerly worn by parsons and others of the ministry.) A wide shiny band of reflective silvery hairs occurs on the cephalothorax. The legs that are brown, banded with black and relatively long; parson spiders are fast runners. Distribution in Colorado: Four species are known from Colorado: Herpyllus bubulcus, H. ecclesiasticus (eastern parson spider), H. Figures 1, 2. Top and side views of two hesperolus, and H. propinquus (western parson different spieces of parson spider (Herpyllus spider). At least one Herpyllus species can likely spp.). Lower photograph courtesy of David be found in any Colorado county and human- Shetlar, The Ohio State University. assisted transfers of these spiders is likely common. Life History and Habits: Parson spiders can be common invaders of buildings in late summer and early fall. Indoors they may be found crawling on walls and they can move quickly, often running in a zig-zag pattern. They do not breed indoors. The parson spiders are active at night and in twilight hours. During the day they seek cover provided by loose bark, boards or other sheltering sites and often form a silken retreat within which they rest. Life history is poorly known. Eggs of at least some species are produced in late summer and early fall.
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae) Parasite–Host Association
    2006. The Journal of Arachnology 34:273–278 SHORT COMMUNICATION FIRST UNEQUIVOCAL MERMITHID–LINYPHIID (ARANEAE) PARASITE–HOST ASSOCIATION David Penney: Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Susan P. Bennett: Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK. ABSTRACT. The first description of a Mermithidae–Linyphiidae parasite–host association is presented. The nematode is preserved exiting the abdomen of the host, which is a juvenile Tenuiphantes species (Araneae, Linyphiidae), collected from the Isle of Mull, UK. An updated taxonomic list of known mer- mithid spider hosts is provided. The ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the direct and indirect life cycles of mermithid worms suggests that both occur in spiders. Keywords: Aranimermis, Isle of Mull, Linyphiidae, Mermithidae, Nematoda Nematode parasites of spiders are restricted to an updated and taxonomically correct list in Table the family Mermithidae but are not uncommon 1. Here we describe the first Mermithidae–Liny- (Poinar 1985, 1987) and were first reported almost phiidae parasite–host association and discuss the two and a half centuries ago (Roesel 1761). How- ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the ever, given the difficulty of identifying and rearing life cycles of mermithid worms. post-parasitic juvenile mermithids, they have re- This paper concerns three spider specimens, one ceived inadequate systematic treatment (Poinar with a worm in situ and two that are presumed to 1985). In addition, the complete life history is have been parasitized, but from which the worms known for only one species of these spider parasites have emerged and are lost.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, C07C 39/00 (2006.01) C07D 303/32 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, C07C 49/242 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (21) International Application Number: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PCT/US20 16/048092 PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (22) International Filing Date: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 22 August 2016 (22.08.2016) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (30) Priority Data: TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, 62/208,662 22 August 2015 (22.08.2015) US TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant: NEOZYME INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Native Forest Dynamics Upon the Arrangements of Species in Oak Forests-Analysis of Heterogeneity Effects at the Example of Epigeal Arthropods
    Master thesis Summer term 2011 The effect of native forest dynamics upon the arrangements of species in oak forests-analysis of heterogeneity effects at the example of epigeal arthropods Die Auswirkungen natürlicher Walddynamiken auf die Artengefüge in Eichenwäldern: Untersuchung von Heterogenitätseffekten am Beispiel epigäischer Raubarthropoden Study course: Ecology, Evolution and Nature conservation (M.Sc.) University of Potsdam presented by Marco Langer 757463 1. Evaluator: Prof. Dr. Monika Wulf, Institut für Landnutzungssysteme Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung e.V. 2. Evaluator: Tim Mark Ziesche, Landeskompetenzzentrum Eberswalde Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URL http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2011/5558/ URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-55588 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-55588 Abstract The heterogeneity in species assemblages of epigeal spiders was studied in a natural forest and in a managed forest. Additionally the effects of small-scale microhabitat heterogeneity of managed and unmanaged forests were determined by analysing the spider assemblages of three different microhabitat structures (i. vegetation, ii. dead wood. iii. litter cover). The spider were collected in a block design by pitfall traps (n=72) in a 4-week interval. To reveal key environmental factors affecting the spider distribution abiotic and biotic habitat parameters (e.g. vegetation parameters, climate parameters, soil moisture) were assessed around each pitfall trap. A TWINSPAN analyses separated pitfall traps from the natural forest from traps of the managed forest. A subsequent discriminant analyses revealed that the temperature, the visible sky, the plant diversity and the mean diameter at breast height as key discriminant factors between the microhabitat groupings designated by The TWINSPAN analyses.
    [Show full text]